Professional Documents
Culture Documents
10.1115imece2010 39548 1
10.1115imece2010 39548 1
10.1115imece2010 39548 1
IMECE2010
November 12-18, 2010, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Proceedings of the ASME 2010 International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition
IMECE2010
November 12-18, 2010, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
IMECE2010-3
IMECE2010-39548
Marco Raciti Castelli (*), Guido Ardizzon (*), Lorenzo Battisti (**),
Ernesto Benini (*), Giorgio Pavesi (*)
(*) Department of Mechanical Engineering – University of Padova
Via Venezia, 1 – 35131 Padova, Italy
(**) Department of Mechanical and Structural Engineering – University of Trento
Via Mesiano, 77 I – 38123 Povo (TN), Italy
marco.raciticastelli@unipd.it (corresponding author)
λ = ωR / V∞ (2)
WIND TUNNEL SUB-GRID
These data are defined as " rough " because the correction Figure 4 shows the main dimensions of the Wind Tunnel
due to wind tunnel blockage was not considered, in order to sub-grid area for a two-dimensional case.
minimize any sources of error due to a wrong estimation of the
blockage of the wind tunnel itself: the operation of the rotor
inside the wind tunnel was numerically simulated by
reproducing a computational domain of rectangular shape,
having the same wind tunnel test section size.
Furthermore, this choice has the significant advantage of
reducing the computational domain, allowing a saving in the
total number of mesh elements (even if low, since increasing
the distance from the rotor, the cell size significantly increases).
The correction of the friction resistive torque due to the
bearings interposed between rotor and torquemeter was taken
into account. Figure 4 Main dimensions of the Wind Tunnel sub-grid area
(dimensions in mm)
0.35
Inlet and outlet boundary conditions were placed
0.30
respectively 10 diameters upwind and 14 diameters downwind
0.25 with respect to the rotor, allowing a full development of the
0.20 wake, as suggested by the work of Ferreira et al [3].
Cp
0.00
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
Tip Speed Ratio
70
Average y+ .
where n is the population of data analyzed, x is the average
60
value of blade y+ and σ is the standard deviation.
Figure 21 adds some information about the asymmetry of 50
the y+ parameter: it can be observed that some azimuthal
positions, though having acceptable y+ average values, present 40
very high asymmetry values, thus being critical for the
accuracy of the numerical solution 30
0 60 120 180 240 300 360
Blade azimuthal position [°]
0.4
0.2
Asymmetry [-] .
0
0 60 120 180 240 300 360
-0.2
-0.4
70
Average y+ .
where n is the population of data analyzed, x is the average
60
value of blade y+ and σ is the standard deviation.
Figure 21 adds some information about the asymmetry of 50
the y+ parameter: it can be observed that some azimuthal
positions, though having acceptable y+ average values, present 40
very high asymmetry values, thus being critical for the
accuracy of the numerical solution 30
0 60 120 180 240 300 360
Blade azimuthal position [°]
0.4
0.2
Asymmetry [-] .
0
0 60 120 180 240 300 360
-0.2
-0.4
100
Percentual single-bladed rotor performance
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
No tip effects Tip effects Tip effects
No spokes drag No spokes drag Spokes drag
PRINCIPLE OF SUPERPOSITION FOR TIP EFFECTS • the CFD code is able to replicate the shape of the
AND SPOKES DRAG experimental curve;
A complete campaign of analysis was run for different • the CFD code is able to accurately capture the
angular velocity, showing that tip effects and spokes drag are maximum power coefficient tip speed ratio;
roughly constant over rotor operational angular velocity range. • the discrepancies between the two curves, roughly
The comparison between the following simulations: constant over rotor operational angular range and
corresponding to about one half of two-dimensional
•
two-dimensional single-bladed configuration; power coefficient for optimum tip speed ratio, are due
•
three-dimensional single-bladed configuration; to the combined effects of finite blade length and
•
three-dimensional single-bladed configuration with spokes drag;
spokes • the BE-M simulations underestimate the CFD
proved that overall rotor performances could be obtained as the prediction, while experimental data are
superposition of: underestimated. This result was expected since the