Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 10

OLIGONUCLEOTIDES 17:251–257 (2007)

© Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.


DOI: 10.1089/oli.2006.0063

Hairpin RNA-Mediated Strategies for Silencing of


Tomato Leaf Curl Virus AC1 and AC4 Genes for
Effective Resistance in Plants

S.V. RAMESH,1* A.K. MISHRA,2 and S. PRAVEEN2*


Downloaded by University Of Illinois At Urbana-champaign from www.liebertpub.com at 10/31/21. For personal use only.

ABSTRACT

RNA interference (RNAi) using short interfering RNAs (siRNAs) has been widely explored for the
suppression of intracellular viral target mRNAs. On the basis of our previous work with stable si-
lencing of Tomato leaf curl virus, in vivo by the antisense replicase gene (AC1) of the virus and char-
acterizing AC4, as a small RNA regulator, besides its role in pathogenicity, we used four different
plasmid vector-based siRNA generation strategies to silence viral genes (AC1 and AC4) of tomato
leaf curl viruses. The RNAi target sequence were chosen from DNA A of the Tomato leaf curl virus
(ToLCV) on the basis of conserved regions in AC1 with an overlapping sequences of the AC4 gene.
Different hairpin RNA-mediated strategies like antisense, self-complementary inverted repeats, in-
tron-spliced hairpin RNAs, and small hairpin RNAs were deployed for efficient and predictable re-
sistance to the viruses. Here we present that appropriately designed siRNAs not only prevents RNAi
suppression but also help in developing trait-stable transgenics. These strategies imply that ToLCV
rep-driven RNAi, targeting AC4 and conserved viral sequences, provides a promising approach to
suppress a wide spectrum ToLCV infection in the tomato.

INTRODUCTION al., 2001). These findings raised our interest in RNAi as


an effective strategy against Tomato leaf curl disease
(ToLCD), caused by different variants of Tomato leaf
R NA INTERFERENCE is an ancient natural mechanism
that directs gene silencing in a sequence-specific
manner (Ratcliff et al., 1997, 1999; Voinnet, 2001). It has
curl virus globally. Our previous study demonstrated that
antisense technology could specifically suppress the ex-
already been established as an invaluable research tool in pression of the Tomato leaf curl New Delhi virus
adaptive defense mechanisms against viruses infecting (Praveen et al., 2005). Present strategies have generated
animal and plant cells (Ding et al., 2004). But can RNA much more hope for the use of RNAi as a novel antiviral
interference be used as an effective antiviral strategy in therapy targeting different variants of the virus by chal-
development of trait-stable transgenics? Recently, in tis- lenging conserved viral sequences along with the viral
sue culture models, impressive results have been suppressor affecting RNAi machinery (Vanitharani et al.,
achieved against various plant viruses using RNA inter- 2004;Anandlakshmi et al. 1998; Bisaro, 2006).
ference to target viral genes (Nicola-Negri et al., 2005; ToLCD occurs in all the major tomato-growing areas
Pooggin et al., 2003; Waterhouse et al., 2001; Wesley et of the world. In India, the occurrence of the ToLCD is

1
Division of Biochemistry, and 2Advanced Center for Plant Virology, Division of Plant Pathology, Indian Agricultural Research
Institute, New Delhi-110012, India.
*These authors contributed equally to this work.

251
252 RAMESH ET AL.

widespread, causing yield reduction and economic Besides T-rep sequences, 60 nucleotides (254–313 nu-
losses, and is continuously emerging in new areas. The cleotides of the AC1 gene) and 80 nucleotides (254–339
emergence of ToLCD in geographically widely separated nucleotides of the AC1 gene) from this T-rep region were
areas suggests the independent origin of the disease in chosen based on a potent siRNA-producing capability for
different regions resulting in greater diversity of the asso- self-complementary inverted repeats (IR) and intron
ciated viruses. The single-stranded DNA genome of the spliced hairpin RNA (Ihp RNA) construct formation, re-
virus is replicated in the host nuclei via double-stranded spectively. A region comprised of 21 nucleotides of po-
DNA intermediates using a rolling circle mechanism tent siRNA was selected for a short hairpin RNA
(Saunders et al., 1991; Stenger et al., 1991). The virus (shRNA) construct.
multiplication relies mostly on the host DNA replication
apparatus with only one virus-encoded protein, replicase,
Plasmid construction for siRNA generation
or replication initiator protein (Rep). The product of the
AC1 ORF, Rep, plays its key role by initiating the rolling A truncated rep sequence of 479 nucleotides (129–607
circle replication by virtue of its nicking and ligation of rep gene) was amplified using specific primers
Downloaded by University Of Illinois At Urbana-champaign from www.liebertpub.com at 10/31/21. For personal use only.

property. An overlapping ORF AC4 with in the AC1 (5CATCAAGATCTGTGGAGAGAGC3 and 5CGT-
gene is characterized as a pathogenicity determinant as CGATTGGGTCT CGTCTA 3) from the pGEM–T–
well as a suppressor of RNAi (Chellappan et al., 2005). EASY rep plasmid as a template. A PCR fragment was
Tomato leaf curl disease is known to be caused by a cloned in the pGEM–T–EASY vector and confirmed by
large number of geminiviruses, which share only 70–90% sequencing. T-rep was further subcloned in the pUC 118
homology in their genomes. In India alone, five distinct vector under the transcription control of the Cauliflower
geminiviruses have been reported to cause the disease mosaic virus 35 S promoter and 35S terminator at the
(Varma and Malathi, 2003). For establishing RNAi as a NotI site. The cassette comprised of the 35S promoter, T-
viable approach in managing these viruses multiple siR- rep, and terminator (1078 bp) was released from the pUC
NAs would be required, focusing on the conserved region 118 clone using BamHI and HindIII, then subcloned in
of the viral genome (Praveen et al., 2004), as well as tar- pCAMBIA 2301, a binary vector at the respective sites. It
geting the viral suppressor (Nicola-Negri et al., 2005). was later transformed to the Agrobacterium tumefaciens
Analysis of the replication initiator protein (AC1) gene strain LBA 4404.
from different variants of viruses suggests a conserved
core of 318 nucleotides at the 3’ end of the gene encoding
Self-complementary IR construct
for Motif III, playing a vital role in viral replication. In
this study, we describe strategies for crossinhibition of DNA sequences homologous to 60 bases of viral ge-
ToLCV replication by siRNAs targeted to various con- nome of ToLCNDV consisting of 18 nucleotides from the
served regions of the AC1 gene. The multiple siRNAs AC4 region and 42 nucleotides from the conserved AC1
have been used to target the AC1 gene, including a small region were selected. Inverted repeats of 120 bp were syn-
overlapping AC4 gene essential for pathogenicity and thesized in vitro using Taq polymerase and appropriately
having silencing suppression activity. designed oligonucleotides. The sequence spans the viral
genome from 254–313 (Acc. No. AF 524893), and conse-
quently, it includes a potent siRNA-inducing sequence:
MATERIALS AND METHODS CACATTTCCATCCGAACATTC(-sense) and TCGT-
GTAAAGGTAGGCTTGTA(-antisense).
Selection of target sequences
It was cloned in the pUC 118 vector between and under
The reference sequences of the conserved regions of the the transcription control of the Cauliflower mosaic virus
ToLCV AC1 gene were obtained from the National Center 35 S promoter and 35S terminator. The cassette com-
for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Web site (www. prised of the promoter, the inverted repeat, and the termi-
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and compared with those of ToLCNDV nator (720 bp) was released from the pUC 118 clone us-
by nucleotide (nt) BLAST (Dasgupta et al., 2004). The re- ing EcoRI and Hind III then subcloned in pCAMBIA
gions of interest encoding for replicase and AC4 proteins 2301, a binary vector at the respective sites. It was later
have a relatively conserved nucleotide sequences, as dia- transformed to the A. tumefaciens strain LBA 4404.
grammed (Fig. 1). Truncated rep sequences of 479 (T-rep)
were selected based on: (1) sequences from conserved
Intron spliced hairpin RNA (Ihp RNA) construct
core of AC1,318 nt (272–590 of the AC1 gene), and (2) se-
quences covering AC4 ORF (suppressor of RNAi), 176 nt DNA sequences homologous to 80 bases of viral ge-
(157–333 of the AC1 gene), capable of producing potent nome consisting of 18 nucleotides from the AC4 region,
siRNA, which is analyzed through an siRNA design algo- and 62 nucleotides from the conserved core of the AC1
rithm DEQOR (Henschel et al., 2004). gene were selected. Inverted repeats of 250 bp was syn-
SILENCING OF TOMATO LEAF CURL VIRUS 253

FIG. 1. Functional domains of replication initiator protein (Rep) of the Tomato leaf curl virus; truncated Rep (T-rep) targets
DNA binding, cleavage, and oligomerization domains. It also includes motif III and Tyr103 (Y).
Downloaded by University Of Illinois At Urbana-champaign from www.liebertpub.com at 10/31/21. For personal use only.

thesized in vitro as described earlier with an intron (Poog- synthesis of short inverted repeats with an eight nucleo-
gin et al., 2003) of 85 bp placed between the repeats. The tide sequence for loop formation. It was cloned in the
sequence spans the viral genome from 254–339 (Acc. No. pUC118 vector between and under the transcription con-
AF 524893) and consequently, it includes a potent trol of the Cauliflower mosaic virus 35 S promoter and
siRNA-inducing sequence as mentioned previously. It 35S terminator. The cassette comprising of the promoter,
was cloned in the pUC 118 vector between and under the the inverted repeat, and the terminator (50 bp) was re-
transcription control of the Cauliflower mosaic virus 35 S leased from the pUC 118 clone using EcoRI and HindIII,
promoter and 35S terminator. The cassette comprising of then subcloned in pCAMBIA 2301, a binary vector at the
the promoter, the inverted repeat, and the terminator (850 respective sites. It was later transformed to the A. tumefa-
bp) was released from the pUC 118 clone using EcoRI ciens strain LBA 4404.
and HindIII, then subcloned in pCAMBIA 2301, a binary
vector at the respective sites. It was later transformed to Gene silencing studies
the A. tumefaciens strain LBA 4404.
Tomato plants infected with the Tomato leaf curl virus
were maintained in a glasshouse condition through
Short hairpin RNA (sh RNA) construct
whitefly transmission. For gene silencing assays, calli
A DNA sequence of 21 bases homologous to potent derived from young symptomatic leaves were regener-
siRNA in the viral genome (254–274) was selected for ated and cocultivated separately with Agrobacterium car-

FIG. 2. Different hairpin-mediated RNAi strategies targeting different viral sequences capable of producing potent siRNA and
their predicted RNA structures.
A
Downloaded by University Of Illinois At Urbana-champaign from www.liebertpub.com at 10/31/21. For personal use only.

FIG. 3. Gene silencing studies. (A) Structure of Ihp and IR pre-siRNA constructs represented as hairpin RNAs. siRNA targeting
viral AC1 RNA is expressed in the tomato. (B) Transgenic tomato plants expressing different RNAi constructs showed recovery
from ToLCV infection. Morphological abnormalities were also associated with plants expressing shRNA gene constructs. Healthy
and infected tomato plants were used as controls. (C) The efficacy of the viral gene silencing was ascertained by the presence or
the absence of ToLCV coat protein gene through PCR.
SILENCING OF TOMATO LEAF CURL VIRUS 255

rying the constructs (McCormick, 1991). Explants were when transformed with each of antisense T-rep, IR, and
incubated in Petri plates on callusing medium containing Ihp gene constructs were found to be fully recovered
MSsalts, vitamins, 3% sucrose, 0.2 mg/L NAA, 1 mg/L from the virus infection, while the non-transformed
BAP, 50 mg/L kanamycin (in the case of cocultivated ex- (regenerated from the ToLCV-infected leaf) plants
plants), and 200 mg/L cefotaxime (pH 5.8). The culture showed the typical leaf curl symptom, poor growth,
conditions were 25°C for a 16-hour photoperiod. They and poor root formation. Recovery of infected plants
were later transferred to shooting and rooting medium, from virus infection was supported at the molecular
respectively (MS salts, 2.5 mg/L BAP, 0.5 mg/L IBA; level by the PCR-based analysis of the presence or ab-
half MS, 0.2 mg/L NAA, respectively). Kanamycin sence of the viral coat protein gene. The suppression of
(50–100 mg/ L) was used for selection of transgenic the viral genome was confirmed by the nonamplifica-
tomato plants. The rooted explants were transplanted into tion of the coat protein gene in plants transformed with
small pots containing a sterilized (soil:peat:vermiculite, Agrobacterium containing the RNAi constructs against
1:1:1) mixture for establishment. The transformed as the control (Fig. 3C). The percentage of recovery of
well as the nontransformed plants were shifted to large transformed plants using different RNAi constructs
Downloaded by University Of Illinois At Urbana-champaign from www.liebertpub.com at 10/31/21. For personal use only.

earthen pots in the greenhouse before being assayed for varied from 80% to 95% (Fig. 4). The differential si-
the presence of virus. lencing in terms of percentage recovery might be at-
Transformed and nontransformed plants were ob- tributed to the construct efficacy or positional effect of
served for the development of leaf curl symptoms from the transgene integration. Recovered plants showed
the shooting stage onward and the presence/absence of faster growth in each plant transformation stage. Mor-
virus was substantiated by PCR analysis using specific phologically abnormal transformants (showing shoot
primers (forward primer: 5-TTGGATCCATGGCGA- initiation without the auxiliary buds) were also ob-
AGCGACCA-3 and reverse primer 5-AAGAGCTCT- tained when transformed with a shRNA construct, indi-
TAATTTGTGACCGA-3) for the coat protein gene cating cross-silencing of plant transcripts. The results
(AV1;AY390957) of ToLCV. suggested that the siRNA generated by antisense T-rep,
IR, and Ihp were found to be more effective in silenc-
ing viral infection. However, shRNA construct produc-
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ing 21 nucleotides siRNA homologous to potent
siRNA in the viral genome (254–274) may be involved
DEQOR, a Web-based siRNA design algorithm, was in cross-silencing of the host genome (Fig. 3B).
employed to find potent siRNA oligonucleotide se- Previously, we have investigated the efficacy of the an-
quences with the entire AC1 gene (AF 524893) as an in- tisense full-length rep gene construct in silencing the ho-
put query. The algorithm evaluated the query in silico for mologous viral genome (Praveen et al., 2005) as the
its ability to induce sequence-specific AC1 gene silencing plants regenerated from ToLCV-infected tomato ex-
and for its ability to cross-silence genes different from the plants fully recovered when transformed with the anti-
target by performing BLAST searches against the genome sense rep gene construct. In the present study, we have
of Arabidopsis and Oryza. The siRNA scoring system of further demonstrated that siRNAs directed to the con-
the algorithm displayed 10 effective siRNAs, among served regions of the ToLCV rep gene and targeting the
these one potent siRNA with favorable GC content of
42.9%, antisense preference, no polynucleotide feature,
no cross-silencing ability on the plant genome, possessing 100
a target sequence against both AC4 and the conserved 90
AC1 gene was selected for RNAi based construct devel- 80
% of recovered plants

opment. The conserved target region corresponds to the 70


Motif III of the replicase protein, and contributes to DNA 60 Normal
binding, cleavage, and oligomerization domains. It also 50 Abnormal
targets conserved residue, Tyr103(Y), involved at the ac- 40
tive site of the protein (Fig. 1). 30
The siRNAs targeted to the conserved regions of
20
ToLCV rep gene were designed by the antisense, IR,
10
Ihp, and sh RNA approach, as shown in Figure 2. To
0
study the efficacy of constructs in silencing viral ge- T-Rep IR Ihp RNA shRNA
nome, these constructs were mobilized in a healthy and
RNAi Constructs
ToLCV-infected tomato through Agrobacterium-medi-
ated transformation as discussed by Praveen et al. FIG. 4. Percentage of tomato plants recovered from viral in-
(2005). About 38 out of 40 ToLCV-infected explants, fection upon transformation with various RNAi constructs.
256 RAMESH ET AL.

AC4 region through antisense T-rep, IR, and Ihp, could the serious viral pathogen causing cotton leaf curl disease.
inhibit the expression of existing leaf curl virus. How- Arch. Virol. 148, 2341–2352.
ever, unexpected behavior of shRNA construct may be BISARO, D.M. (2006). Silencing suppression by geminivirus
attributed to cross-silencing of the tomato genome. Our proteins. Virology 344, 158–168.
CHELLAPPAN, P., VANITHARANI, R., FAUQUET, C.M.
data suggest that it is feasible to produce multiple siR-
(2005) MicroRNA-binding viral protein interferes with Ara-
NAs, focusing on the conserved regions of the viral ge-
bidopsis development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102,
nome, against the high genetic variability of tomato leaf 10381–10386.
curl viruses or the viral escape. DASGUPTA, A., SINHA, S.K., and PRAVEEN, S. (2004).
The Rep gene was chosen as targets in this study for Structure of replication initiator protein unites diverse
two reasons. First, it is well known that rep-mediated re- viruses causing tomato leaf curl disease (ToLCD). Plant Sci.
sistance is successful against geminiviruses (Aragao et 166, 1063–1067.
al., 1998; Asad et al., 2003; Yang et al., 2004), it has an DING, S.W., LI, H., LU, R., and LI, W.X. (2004). RNA silenc-
overlapping ORF AC4 corresponding to suppressor of ing: a conserved antiviral immunity of plants and animals.
RNAi. Therefore, in order to realize efficient RNAi in- Virus Res. 102, 109–115.
Downloaded by University Of Illinois At Urbana-champaign from www.liebertpub.com at 10/31/21. For personal use only.

duction, it is important to screen appropriate target re- HENSCHEL, A., BUCHILZ, F., and HABERMANN, B.
(2004). DEQOR: a web-based tool for the design and quality
gions along the ToLCV rep gene conferring a strong
control of siRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 113–120.
RNAi activity. Secondly, because of the high genetic
MCCORMICK, S. (1991). Transformation of tomato with
variability of ToLCVs, the relatively conserved regions Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Tissue Cult. Manual B6,
with important functions were focused on. At present, 1–9.
there is a lack of clear understanding on the mechanisms NICOLA-NEGRI, D.E., BRUNETTI, A., TAVAZZA, M.
that determine the gene-silencing efficiency of a given and ILARDI, V. (2005). Hairpin RNA mediated silencing
siRNA. Recent studies show that the gene-silencing effi- of Plum pox virus P1 and HC-Pro genes for efficient and
ciency of siRNA is strongly dependent on the local struc- predictable resistance to the virus. Transgenic Res. 14,
ture of mRNA at the targeted region. To further test the 989–994.
relationship between silencing efficiency and targeted POOGGIN, M., SHIVAPRASAD, P.V., VELUTHAMBI, K.
mRNA, work needs to be done on these aspects. Addi- and HOHN, T. (2003). RNAi targeting of DNA virus in
plants. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 131–132.
tionally, in our study, the unusual characteristics (with no
PRAVEEN, S., DASGUPTA, A., and VARMA, A. (2004).
apical buds) of transformed tomato with shRNA seems
Phylogenetic analysis and homologies of the replicase
apparently cross-silencing some vital gene of the tomato, of tomato leaf curl geminiviruses: implications for obtain-
for which further work is required to evaluate if tomato ing pathogen derived resistance. Virus Gene 28, 197–
transcripts are being cross-silenced with the siRNA of 201.
shRNA gene construct. PRAVEEN, S., MISHRA, A.K., and DSGUPTA, A. (2005)
Our results take RNAi-based antiviral strategy a step Antisense suppression of replicase gene expression recovers
forward to the control of ToLCD. Other than viral es- tomato plants from leaf curl virus infection. Plant Sci. 168,
cape, several critical issues need to be addressed to im- 1011–1014.
prove RNAi effectiveness as an antiviral strategy. It is RATCLIFF, F., HARRISON, B., and BAULCOMBE, D.C.
anticipated that the researchers would convert more and (1997). A similarity between viral defense and gene silencing
in plants. Science 276, 1558–1560.
more new laboratory approaches based on RNAi to effec-
RATCLIFF, F., MACFARLANE, S., and BAULCOMBE,
tive procedures to treat viral diseases.
D.C. (1999). Gene silencing with out DNA: RNA mediated
cross protection between viruses. Plant Cell 11,
1207–1215.
REFERENCES SAUNDERS, K., LUCY, A., and STANLEY, J. (1991). DNA
forms of the geminivirus of African cassava mosaic virus
ANANDLAKSHMI, R., PRUSS, G.J., GE, X., MARATHE, consistent with a rolling circle mechanism of replication. Nu-
R., MALLORY, A.C., SMITH, T.H. and VANCE, V.B. cleic Acids Res. 19, 2325–2330.
(1998). A viral suppressor of gene silencing in plant. Proc. STENGER, D.C., REVINGTON, G.N., STEVENSON, M.C.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 13079–13084. and BISARO, D.M. (1991). Replicational release of gemi-
ARAGAO, F.J.L., RIBEIRO, S.G., BARROS, L.M.J., nivirus genomes from tandemly repeated copies: evidence
BRASILEIRO, A.C.M., MAXWELL, D.P., RECH, E.L., for rolling-circle replication of a plant viral DNA. Proc. Natl.
and FARIA, J.C. (1998). Transgenic beans (Phaseolus vul- Acad. Sci. USA 88, 8029–8033.
garis L.) engineered to express viral antisense RNAs show VANITHARANI, R., CHELLAPPAN, P., PITA, J.S., and
delayed and attenuated symptoms to bean golden mosaic FAUQUET, C. (2004). Differential roles of AC2 and AC4 of
geminivirus. Mol. Breed 4, 491–499. cassava geminiviruses in mediating synergism and suppres-
ASAD, S., HARIS, W.A., BASHIR, A., ZAFAR, Y., MALIK, sion of posttranscriptional gene silencing. J. Virol. 78,
K.A., MALIK, N.N. and LICHTENSTEI, C.P. (2003).Trans- 9478–9498.
genic tobacco expressing geminiviral RNAs are resistant to VARMA, A., and MALATHI, V.G. (2003). Emerging gemi-
SILENCING OF TOMATO LEAF CURL VIRUS 257

nivirus problems: a serious threat crop production. Ann. YANG, Y., SHERWOOD, T.A., PATTE, C.P., HIEBERT, E.
Appl. Biol. 142, 145–164. and POLSTON, J.E., (2004). Use of Tomato yellow leaf curl
VOINNET, O. (2001). RNA silencing as a plant immune sys- virus (TYLCV) rep gene sequences to engineer TYLCV resis-
tem against viruses. Trends Genet. 17, 449–459. tance in tomato. Phytopathology 94(5), 491–496.
WATERHOUSE, P.M., WANG, M.B., and LOUGH T. (2001).
Gene silencing as an adaptive defence against viruses. Nature Address reprint requests to:
411, 834–842. S. Praveen
WESLEY, V., HELLIWELL, C.A., SMITH, N.A., WANG, Advanced Center for Plant Virology
M.B., ROUSE, D.T., LIU, Q., GOODING, P.S., SINGH,
Division of Plant Pathology
S.P., ABBOTT, D., STOUTJESDIJK, P.A., ROBINSON,
S.P., GLEAVE, A.P., GREEN, A.G., and WATERHOUSE,
Indian Agriculture Research Institute
P.M. (2001). Construct design for efficient, effective and New Delhi 110012, India
high-throughput gene silencing in plants. Plant J. 27,
581–591. E-mail: shellypraveen@hotmail.com
Downloaded by University Of Illinois At Urbana-champaign from www.liebertpub.com at 10/31/21. For personal use only.
This article has been cited by:

1. Yi-Shu Chiu, Yuh Tzean, Yi-Hui Chen, Chi-Wei Tsai, Hsin-Hung Yeh. 2021. Fungal F8-Culture Filtrate Induces Tomato
Resistance against Tomato Yellow Leaf Curl Thailand Virus. Viruses 13:8, 1434. [Crossref]
2. Hymavathi Salava, Sravankumar Thula, Vijee Mohan, Rahul Kumar, Fatemeh Maghuly. 2021. Application of Genome Editing in
Tomato Breeding: Mechanisms, Advances, and Prospects. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22:2, 682. [Crossref]
3. Anurag Kumar Sahu, Neeti-Sanan Mishra, Rajarshi Kumar Gaur. Suppressor to Survival: RNAi as a Molecular Weapon in Arms
Race Between Virus and Host 131-154. [Crossref]
4. Konstantin B. Blyuss, Fahad Al Basir, Victoria A. Tsygankova, Liudmyla O. Biliavska, Galyna O. Iutynska, Serhii N. Kyrychko,
Serhii V. Dziuba, Olexandr I. Tsyliuryk, Olexandr O. Izhboldin. 2020. Control of mosaic disease using microbial biostimulants:
insights from mathematical modelling. Ricerche di Matematica 69:2, 437-455. [Crossref]
5. Ramanna Koulagi, Sagar Banerjee, Bharat H. Gawade, Ashish Kumar Singh, P. K. Jain, Shelly Praveen, K. Subramaniam, Anil
Sirohi. 2020. Host-delivered RNA interference in tomato for mediating resistance against Meloidogyne incognita and Tomato
Downloaded by University Of Illinois At Urbana-champaign from www.liebertpub.com at 10/31/21. For personal use only.

leaf curl virus. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) 143:2, 345-361. [Crossref]
6. T. Vinutha, S. Vanchinathan, Navita Bansal, Gaurav Kumar, Vipin Permar, Archana Watts, S. V. Ramesh, Shelly Praveen. 2020.
Tomato auxin biosynthesis/signaling is reprogrammed by the geminivirus to enhance its pathogenicity. Planta 252:4. . [Crossref]
7. Özge Çelik, Sinan Meriç, Alp Ayan, Çimen Atak. Biotic stress-tolerant plants through small RNA technology 435-468. [Crossref]
8. Vidya Sagar, Pradip Karmakar, Jyoti Devi, Nakul Gupta, Bharat Raj Meena. Begomovirus Menace and Its Management in
Vegetable Crops 493-521. [Crossref]
9. H.A. Walsh, H. Vanderschuren, S. Taylor, M.E.C. Rey. 2019. RNA silencing of South African cassava mosaic virus in transgenic
cassava expressing AC1/AC4 hp- RNA induces tolerance. Biotechnology Reports 24, e00383. [Crossref]
10. Shunmugiah V. Ramesh, Maranna Shivakumar, Shelly Praveen, Bhagat S. Chouhan, Suresh Chand. 2019. Expression of short
hairpin RNA (shRNA) targeting AC2 gene of Mungbean yellow mosaic India virus (MYMIV) reduces the viral titre in soybean.
3 Biotech 9:9. . [Crossref]
11. Neelam Chaudhary, Arun Kumar, Baudh Bharti. Functional Genomics of Microbial Pathogens for Crop Improvement 145-162.
[Crossref]
12. T. Vinutha, Gaurav Kumar, Varsha Garg, Tomas Canto, Peter Palukaitis, S.V. Ramesh, Shelly Praveen. 2018. Tomato geminivirus
encoded RNAi suppressor protein, AC4 interacts with host AGO4 and precludes viral DNA methylation. Gene 678, 184-195.
[Crossref]
13. Ru Yu, Caixia Chen, Weilin Cao, Hongmei Liu, Shumei Zhou, Yunzhi Song, Changxiang Zhu. 2018. High-degree and broad-
spectrum resistance mediated by a combination of NIb siRNA and miRNA suppresses replication of necrotic and common strains
of potato virus Y. Archives of Virology 163:11, 3073-3081. [Crossref]
14. Krishan Kumar, Chetana Aggarwal, Sapna, Ishwar Singh, Pranjal Yadava. Microbial Genes in Crop Improvement 39-56. [Crossref]
15. Sanjeev Kumar, Bhaben Tanti, Basavaprabhu L. Patil, Sunil Kumar Mukherjee, Lingaraj Sahoo. 2017. RNAi-derived transgenic
resistance to Mungbean yellow mosaic India virus in cowpea. PLOS ONE 12:10, e0186786. [Crossref]
16. Enrique Moriones, Shelly Praveen, Supriya Chakraborty. 2017. Tomato Leaf Curl New Delhi Virus: An Emerging Virus Complex
Threatening Vegetable and Fiber Crops. Viruses 9:10, 264. [Crossref]
17. Shunmugiah Ramesh, Pranav Sahu, Manoj Prasad, Shelly Praveen, Hanu Pappu. 2017. Geminiviruses and Plant Hosts: A Closer
Examination of the Molecular Arms Race. Viruses 9:9, 256. [Crossref]
18. Shelly Praveen, S. V. Ramesh, Satendra Kumar Mangrauthia. Transgenic Approaches to Combat Plant Viruses Occurring in India
783-805. [Crossref]
19. Savarni Tripathi, Raj Verma. Begomoviruses in India 171-186. [Crossref]
20. Huei-mei Chen, Chen-yu Lin, Wen-shi Tsai, Lawrence Kenyon, Ming-tsair Chan, Jo-yi Yen, Shao-yu Chang, Robert de la Peña,
Roland Schafleitner. 2016. Resistance to viral yellow leaf curl in tomato through RNAi targeting two Begomovirus species strains.
Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology 25:2, 199-207. [Crossref]
21. Pranav Pankaj Sahu, Manoj Prasad. 2015. Application of molecular antiviral compounds: novel approach for durable resistance
against geminiviruses. Molecular Biology Reports 42:7, 1157-1162. [Crossref]
22. Gnanasekaran Shanmugapriya, Sudhanshu Sekhar Das, Karuppannan Veluthambi. 2015. Transgenic tobacco plants expressing
siRNA targeted against the Mungbean yellow mosaic virus transcriptional activator protein gene efficiently block the viral DNA
accumulation. VirusDisease 26:1-2, 55-61. [Crossref]
23. Veerendra Kumar Sharma, Nirbhay Kushwaha, Saumik Basu, Ashish Kumar Singh, Supriya Chakraborty. 2015. Identification of
siRNA generating hot spots in multiple viral suppressors to generate broad-spectrum antiviral resistance in plants. Physiology and
Molecular Biology of Plants 21:1, 9-18. [Crossref]
24. Jian Ye, Jing Qu, Hui-Zhu Mao, Zhi-Gang Ma, Nur E Rahman, Chao Bai, Wen Chen, Shu-Ye Jiang, Srinivasan Ramachandran,
Nam-Hai Chua. 2014. Engineering geminivirus resistance in Jatropha curcus. Biotechnology for Biofuels 7:1. . [Crossref]
25. Sheng Sun, Xiu-Ping Kang, Xiao-Juan Xing, Zhi-Feng Chen, Shao-Wen Zheng, Guo-Ming Xing. 2014. Transient expression of
siRNA targeted against the TYLCV AV1, AC1 and AC3 genes for high resistance in tomato. Scientia Horticulturae 179, 321-327.
[Crossref]
26. Yun-Zhi Song, Quan-Jun Han, Fang Jiang, Run-Ze Sun, Zhi-Hang Fan, Chang-Xiang Zhu, Fu-Jiang Wen. 2014. Effects of the
sequence characteristics of miRNAs on multi-viral resistance mediated by single amiRNAs in transgenic tobacco. Plant Physiology
and Biochemistry 77, 90-98. [Crossref]
27. Md. Abul Kalam Azad, Latifah Amin, Nik Marzuki Sidik. 2014. Gene Technology for Papaya Ringspot Virus Disease
Management. The Scientific World Journal 2014, 1-11. [Crossref]
Downloaded by University Of Illinois At Urbana-champaign from www.liebertpub.com at 10/31/21. For personal use only.

28. Diana Medina-Hernández, Rafael Rivera-Bustamante, Francisco Tenllado, Ramón Holguín-Peña. 2013. Effects and Effectiveness
of Two RNAi Constructs for Resistance to Pepper golden mosaic virus in Nicotiana benthamiana Plants. Viruses 5:12, 2931-2945.
[Crossref]
29. Veer B. Singh, Q.M.R. Haq, V.G. Malathi. 2013. Antisense RNA approach targeting Rep gene of Mungbean yellow mosaic India
virus to develop resistance in soybean. Archives Of Phytopathology And Plant Protection 46:18, 2191-2207. [Crossref]
30. L. Zhang, X. Xie, Y. Song, F. Jiang, C. Zhu, F. Wen. 2013. Viral resistance mediated by shRNA depends on the sequence similarity
and mismatched sites between the target sequence and siRNA. Biologia plantarum 57:3, 547-554. [Crossref]
31. Sukumaran Sunitha, Gnanasekaran Shanmugapriya, Veluthambi Balamani, Karuppannan Veluthambi. 2013. Mungbean yellow
mosaic virus (MYMV) AC4 suppresses post-transcriptional gene silencing and an AC4 hairpin RNA gene reduces MYMV DNA
accumulation in transgenic tobacco. Virus Genes 46:3, 496-504. [Crossref]
32. Sivakumar Prasanth Kumar, Saumya K. Patel, Ravi G. Kapopara, Yogesh T. Jasrai, Himanshu A. Pandya. 2012. Evolutionary and
Molecular Aspects of Indian Tomato Leaf Curl Virus Coat Protein. International Journal of Plant Genomics 2012, 1-12. [Crossref]
33. Vidhu Verma, Shweta Sharma, S. Vimla Devi, S. Rajasubramaniam, Indranil Dasgupta. 2012. Delay in virus accumulation and low
virus transmission from transgenic rice plants expressing Rice tungro spherical virus RNA. Virus Genes 45:2, 350-359. [Crossref]
34. S. ROY, A. BANERJEE, J. TARAFDAR, B. K. SENAPATI, I. DASGUPTA. 2012. Transfer of transgenes for resistance to rice
tungro disease into high-yielding rice cultivars through gene-based marker-assisted selection. The Journal of Agricultural Science
150:5, 610-618. [Crossref]
35. Basanta K Borah, Indranil Dasgupta. 2012. Begomovirus research in India: A critical appraisal and the way ahead. Journal of
Biosciences 37:4, 791-806. [Crossref]
36. Avinash Marwal, Rajneesh Prajapat, Anurag Kumar Sahu, R.K. Gaur. 2012. Current Status of Geminivirus in India: RNAi
Technology, A Challenging Cure. Asian Journal of Biological Sciences 5:6, 273-293. [Crossref]
37. Ching-Yi Lin, Wen-Shi Tsai, Hsin-Mei Ku, Fuh-Jyh Jan. 2012. Evaluation of DNA fragments covering the entire genome of
a monopartite begomovirus for induction of viral resistance in transgenic plants via gene silencing. Transgenic Research 21:2,
231-241. [Crossref]
38. Surekha Agarwal, Muthugounder Mohan, Satendra K. Mangrauthia. RNAi: Machinery and Role in Pest and Disease Management
447-469. [Crossref]
39. Jin Ma, Yunzhi Song, Bin Wu, Mingsong Jiang, Kaidong Li, Changxiang Zhu, Fujiang Wen. 2011. Production of transgenic
rice new germplasm with strong resistance against two isolations of Rice stripe virus by RNA interference. Transgenic Research
20:6, 1367-1377. [Crossref]
40. Thomas Hohn, Franck Vazquez. 2011. RNA silencing pathways of plants: Silencing and its suppression by plant DNA viruses.
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms 1809:11-12, 588-600. [Crossref]
41. Betty E. Owor, Darren P. Martin, Edward P. Rybicki, Jennifer A. Thomson, Marion E. Bezuidenhout, Francisco M. Lakay,
Dionne N. Shepherd. 2011. A rep-based hairpin inhibits replication of diverse maize streak virus isolates in a transient assay.
Journal of General Virology 92:10, 2458-2465. [Crossref]
42. Owen Wally, J Jayaraj, Zamir Punja. Transgenic Vegetables 31-54. [Crossref]
43. Xuemei Chen, Jing Liu, Li Xu, Fang Jiang, Xueying Xie, Changxiang Zhu, Fujiang Wen. 2010. Inhibiting Virus Infection by RNA
Interference of the Eight Functional Genes of the Potato Virus Y Genome. Journal of Phytopathology 158:11-12, 776-784. [Crossref]
44. Jaya Soneji, Madhugiri Rao, Padmini Sudarshana, Jogeswar Panigrahi, Chittaranjan Kole. Current Status of On-going Genome
Initiatives 305-353. [Crossref]
45. Zhi-Yong Zhang, Feng-Ling Fu, Lin Gou, Han-Guang Wang, Wan-Chen Li. 2010. RNA Interference-Based Transgenic Maize
Resistant to Maize Dwarf Mosaic Virus. Journal of Plant Biology 53:4, 297-305. [Crossref]
46. Alessandra Frizzi, Shihshieh Huang. 2010. Tapping RNA silencing pathways for plant biotechnology. Plant Biotechnology Journal
8:6, 655-677. [Crossref]
47. R. C. de la Pen˜a, P. Kadirvel, S. Venkatesan, L. Kenyon, J. Hughes. Integrated Approaches to Manage Tomato Yellow Leaf Curl
Viruses 105-132. [Crossref]
48. Shelly Praveen, S. V. Ramesh, Anil K. Mishra, Vikas Koundal, Peter Palukaitis. 2010. Silencing potential of viral derived RNAi
constructs in Tomato leaf curl virus-AC4 gene suppression in tomato. Transgenic Research 19:1, 45-55. [Crossref]
49. Masayuki Isshiki, Hiroaki Kodama. Plant RNAi and Crop Improvement 653-673. [Crossref]
50. Satendra K. Mangrauthia, Priyanka Singh, Shelly Praveen. 2010. Genomics of Helper Component Proteinase Reveals Effective
Strategy for Papaya Ringspot Virus Resistance. Molecular Biotechnology 44:1, 22-29. [Crossref]
Downloaded by University Of Illinois At Urbana-champaign from www.liebertpub.com at 10/31/21. For personal use only.

51. Rahma Jardak-Jamoussi, Patrick Winterhagen, Badra Bouamama, Cornelia Dubois, Ahmed Mliki, Thierry Wetzel, Abdelwahed
Ghorbel, Goetz M. Reustle. 2009. Development and evaluation of a GFLV inverted repeat construct for genetic transformation
of grapevine. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) 97:2, 187-196. [Crossref]
52. Dionne N. Shepherd, Darren P. Martin, Jennifer A. Thomson. 2009. Transgenic strategies for developing crops resistant to
geminiviruses. Plant Science 176:1, 1-11. [Crossref]
53. Satendra K. Mangrauthia, B. Parameswari, R. K. Jain, Shelly Praveen. 2008. Role of Genetic Recombination in the Molecular
Architecture of Papaya ringspot virus. Biochemical Genetics 46:11-12, 835-846. [Crossref]
54. Himani Tyagi, Shanmugam Rajasubramaniam, Manchikatla Venkat Rajam, Indranil Dasgupta. 2008. RNA-interference in rice
against Rice tungro bacilliform virus results in its decreased accumulation in inoculated rice plants. Transgenic Research 17:5,
897-904. [Crossref]

You might also like