1

AVOIDING BIAS SEEMS A COMMENDABLE GOAL, BUT THIS FAILS TO

RECOGNIZE THE POSITIVE ROLE THAT BIAS CAN PLAY IN THE PURSUIT OF
KNOWLEDGE.

By Student’s Name

Course Name and Number

Professor’s Name
University Name
City and State
Date of Submission
 2

AVOIDING BIAS SEEMS A COMMENDABLE GOAL, BUT THIS FAILS TO RECOGNIZE

THE POSITIVE ROLE THAT BIAS CAN PLAY IN THE PURSUIT OF KNOWLEDGE.”
Introduction
There are too many fascinating news to proceed here. One of the approaches could be to make a
separation between ‘good’ and ‘bad’ bias or ‘reasonable’ and ‘unreasonable’ biases on the basis
where some arguments appearing earlier is categorized as invalid. Another instance could be to
declare that the problem with bias in the other case is too little that we handle a circumstance
with some predefined expectations however to ensure that we have to recognize that which they
are so for them not to unduly prejudice our struggles. Again, one must have to identify the exact
formular that suits him or herself but as normally, whatever you choose to use you will still need
to isolate some pointed and promising examples of when bias will either help or destroy the
knowledge process.
It is possible to make argument that we want to put aside other instances of bias, such as
approach bias especially during polling. When one is handling a poll to meet a coherent image of
whosever is the co-runner of an election, it is very significant to note that one must at all times
poll a large adequate cohort with diverse sufficient foundations such that the outcomes are not
skewed by the chosen sample. If we take art as the core basis of study, exploring the idea of
Pollyanna becomes a natural research. Of course, the term Pollyanna principle is used
continuously to mean ‘positive bias and this is giving us the opportunity to be happier, healthier
or feel more comfortable as part and parcel of the community. People who suffer from
depression normally tend to major on the negative events or matters more than they will focus on
the positive things.
Religion
The categorization of religion as a space of knowledge, just like the involvement of faith as a
way of believing can be disputed in many instances. Even though many people identify that
religion plays a crucial role in many peoples lives, atheists will still question to what or which
level is religion or belief can be center or root of knowledge. However, one must always tend to
apprehend that too many people and their customs have lined up their lives around religion.
Religion targets to give answers to some of the giant queries in life for example, the existence
reason, human suffering of the mysteries in the universe. There are numerous sentiments about
religion. Theism puts it that the whole of universe is created and governed by very powerful and
all-knowing God.
Here is a typical example of a story that explains how the concept of religion is crucial. “Clive is
on a recognizable scholarly mission: he needs to compose the ideal novel. Clive has a great deal
going for him: he's shrewd and all-around read; he's made an investigation of contemporary
fiction and can see obviously where his friends have turned out badly; he has perused a decent
arrangement of thorough abstract hypothesis - those exquisite outlines for books not yet
fabricated - and is presently prepared to assemble his unrivaled place of words. Possibly Clive
even shows books, dismantles them, and assembles them back. On the off chance that composing
is a specialty, he has all the abilities, each apparatus. Clive is prepared. He gets out the extra
 3

room in his level, puts resources into an ergonomic seat, and plunks down before the clear
chance of the Microsoft Word program. Floating over his work area he sees the ideal layout of
his dispassionate novel - all he requires to do is drag it from the ether into the genuine. He's
energized. He starts.
Quick forward three years. Some way or another, despite all Clive's earnest attempts, the novel
he has maneuvered into reality isn't the ideal novel that glided so tantalizingly over his PC. It is,
fairly, a helpless simulacrum, a sorry excuse for a shadow. In the progress from the fantasy to the
genuine, it has shed its emanation of flawlessness; its shape is twisted, unrecognizable.
Something disrupted the general flow, something practically difficult to express. For instance,
when it came to molding the personality of the degenerate Hispanic government financial
analyst, Maria Gomez, who is so fundamental to Clive's focal subject of defilement inside
American character legislative issues (Oker, 2003), he discovered he required something more
than essentially "the correct words" or "information about financial experts".
Maria Gomez adequately demonstrates his point about the collapsed American dream, yet in
other, unutterable, ways she appears not exactly to persuade as he'd trusted. He thought that it
was difficult to get into her silk shirt, her pencil skirt - considerably harder to get under her skin.
And afterward, attempting to portray her marriage, he found that he needed to compose keenly
and aphoristically about "Marriage" with a capital M unquestionably more than he needed to
depict Maria's specific marriage, which, thinking about his marriage, appeared to be
unexpectedly a fantastically intricate undertaking, especially if his own better half, Karina,
planned to understand it (Kelly et al., 1995). What's more, there are 1,000,000 other little models
... blemishes that are not just imperfections of language or plan, yet rather defects of ... what?
Him? This idea irritates him for a second. And afterward another, far hazier idea comes. Is it
conceivable that on the off chance that he was just the peruse, and not the author, of this novel,
he would think it a disappointment?
Clive doesn't flounder in such musings for long. His book gets a specialist, his operator gets a
distributor, his novel goes out into the world. It is generally welcomed. Incidentally, that Clive's
book smells like writing and looks like writing and perhaps, discontinuously, feels like writing,
and inevitably Clive himself has nearly overlooked that peculiar sentiment of the lie, of self-
selling out, that his novel previously awakened in him. He becomes his very own fanatic novel,
however, its incredible protector (Fuentes et al., 1998). On the off chance that a pundit calls
attention to an overindulgence here, a purple entry there, well, at that point Clive clarifies this is
just what he expected. It was all to accomplish a specific impact. Clive wouldn't fret such
analysis: criticizing of this sort feels shallow contrasted with the dreary sense he previously had
that his novel was bad but rather false. Nobody is blaming him for so huge a wrongdoing. The
pundits, when they censure, talk about the paintwork and brickwork of the novel, a terrible
illustration, a dreary resolution, and are sure he will fix these little missteps next time round.
Concerning Maria Gomez, everyone concurs that she is similarly as you'd envision a degenerate
Hispanic government financial analyst in a pencil skirt to be. Clive is fulfilled and vindicated. He
starts taking a shot at a spin-off.
 4

Having paid attention to Clive’s story, it is therefore wise concluding that, avoiding bias seems a
commendable goal, but this fails to recognize the positive role that bias can play in the pursuit of
knowledge.
 5

Bibliography
Escayg, Kerry-Ann. "“Who’s got the power?”: A critical examination of the anti-bias
curriculum." International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy 13.1 (2019): 1-
18.
Greenwald, Anthony G., et al. "Under what conditions does theory obstruct research
progress?." Psychological review 93.2 (1986): 216.
Heyden, Mariano LM, et al. "Rethinking ‘top‐down’and ‘bottom‐up’roles of top and middle
managers in organizational change: Implications for employee support." Journal of
management studies 54.7 (2017): 961-985.
Maestripieri, Dario, Andrea Henry, and Nora Nickels. "Explaining financial and prosocial biases
in favor of attractive people: Interdisciplinary perspectives from economics, social
psychology, and evolutionary psychology." Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40 (2017).
Mercier, Hugo, et al. "Natural-born arguers: Teaching how to make the best of our reasoning
abilities." Educational Psychologist 52.1 (2017): 1-16.