INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III, SPET I-IV, Special Science Teacher

I-II P
Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:

Bureau/Center/Service/Division: - Date of Review:

Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Applied 24.00% Quality Demonstrated Level 7 in Demonstrated Level 6 in Demonstrated Level 5 in Demonstrated Level 4 in Demonstrated Level 3 in
Objective 1 as shown in COT Objective 1 as shown in COT Objective 1 as shown in COT Objective 1 as shown in COT Objective 1 as shown in COT
Services Knowledge and knowledge of
rating sheets/interobserver rating sheets/interobserver rating sheets/interobserver rating sheets/interobserver rating sheets/interobserver
Pedagogy content within and agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms or No
across curriculum acceptable evidence was
teaching areas. shown

Efficiency
Timeliness
2. Ensured the Quality Ensured that the ICT used Ensured that the ICT used Ensured that the ICT used Ensured that ICT are used No acceptable evidence was
redefine and transform augment and enrich modify processes and but do not create a new shown
positive use of ICT
learning experiences and are learning experiences and are improve learning learning experience and/or
to facilitate the documented properly and documented properly and experiences and are are documented but not
teaching and consistently using any consistently using any documented properly and consistent with one
learning process referencing style as shown referencing style as shown consistently using any referencing style as shown
in the submitted learning in the submitted learning referencing style as shown in the submitted learning
material material in the submitted learning material
material
Efficiency
Timeliness
3. Applied a range Quality Applied teaching strategies Applied teaching strategies Applied teaching strategies Applied teaching strategies No acceptable evidence was
that challenge learners to that require learners to that require learners to that lead learners along a shown
of teaching
draw conclusions and make connections using describe and explain ideas single path of inquiry
strategies to justify their thinking or put ideas learned as shown in learned as shown in the and/or to simple recall and
develop critical and parts together to promote the submitted learning submitted learning material rote memorization of
creative thinking, deeper understanding of material concepts as shown in the
ideas learned as shown in submitted learning material
as well as other
the submitted learning
higher-order material
thinking skills. Efficiency
Timeliness
 TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION
Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave
Basic Education 1.
2. Content
Diversity of 1. Applied
4. Established a 24.00% Quality Utilized effective teaching Utilized effective teaching Utilized an effective Utilized a teaching strategy No acceptable evidence was
Services Knowledge strategies that are strategies that are teaching strategy that is or strategies that partially shown
Learners & and knowledge of
learnercentered
appropriate in responding to appropriate in responding to appropriate in responding to respond to learners’
Pedagogy
Assessment and content
culture bywithin
using and learners’ linguistic, cultural, learners’ linguistic, cultural, learners’ linguistic, cultural, linguistic, cultural,
Reporting across curriculum
teaching strategies socioeconomic, or religious socioeconomic, or religious socioeconomic, or religious socioeconomic, or religious
teaching areas.
that respond to backgrounds at an backgrounds at a group backgrounds as shown in the backgrounds as shown in the
their linguistic, individual level* as shown level* as shown in the submitted learning material submitted learning material
in the submitted learning submitted learning material
cultural, material
socioeconomic and Efficiency
religious
backgrounds
Timeliness

5. Planned and Quality Demonstrated Level 7 in Demonstrated Level 6 in Demonstrated Level 5 in Demonstrated Level 4 in Demonstrated Level 3 in
Objective 5 as shown in COT Objective 5 as shown in COT Objective 5 as shown in COT Objective 5 as shown in COT Objective 5 as shown in COT
delivered teaching
rating sheets/interobserver rating sheets/interobserver rating sheets/interobserver rating sheets/interobserver rating sheets/interobserver
strategies that are agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms or No
responsive to the acceptable evidence was
special educational shown
needs of learners in
difficult Efficiency
circumstances*, Timeliness
6. Used strategies Quality Provided learners with Provided learners with Provided learners with Provided learners with No evidence was shown
accurate, and specific and accurate, and specific accurate, and general inaccurate and/or
for providing timely,
directed constructive constructive feedback as constructive feedback as destructive feedback as
accurate and feedback* as shown in the shown in the evidence shown in the evidence shown in the evidence
constructive evidence submitted submitted submitted submitted
feedback to
improve learner Efficiency
performance Timeliness MOV submitted shows MOV submitted shows MOV submitted shows MOV submitted shows No evidence was shown
feedback given within 5 feedback given within 6-10 feedback given within 11-20 feedback given beyond 20
working days from working days from working days from working days from
submission** submission** submission** submission**
3. Curriculum and 7. Selected, 16.00% Quality Demonstrated Level 7 in Demonstrated Level 6 in Demonstrated Level 5 in Demonstrated Level 4 in Demonstrated Level 3 in
Objective 7 as shown in COT Objective 7 as shown in COT Objective 7 as shown in COT Objective 7 as shown in COT Objective 7 as shown in COT
Planning developed,
rating sheets/interobserver rating sheets/interobserver rating sheets/interobserver rating sheets/interobserver rating sheets/interobserver
organized and used agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms or No
appropriate acceptable evidence was
teaching and shown
learning resources,
including ICT, to Efficiency
address learning
goals Timeliness

8. Set achievable Quality All of the learning Majority of the learning Half of the learning Less than half of the No acceptable evidence was
outcomes set are aligned outcomes set are aligned outcomes set are aligned learning outcomes set are shown
and appropriate
with the learning with the learning with the learning aligned with the learning
learning outcomes competencies as shown in competencies as shown in competencies as shown in competencies as shown in
that are aligned the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted
with learning Efficiency
competencies
 TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION
8. Set achievable
and appropriate Performance Indicators
learning outcomes Weight Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
that are aligned per KRA QET
with learning 5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave
Basic Education 1. Content competencies
1. Applied 24.00% Timeliness
Services Knowledge and knowledge of Communicated with and
4. Community 9. Built 24.00% Quality Sustained engagement Secured collaboration with Communicated with No acceptable evidence was
Pedagogy content within and with parents/ guardians and/ parents/ guardians and/ or obtained response from parents/ guardians and/or shown
Linkages and relationships with
Professional across curriculum or wider school community to wider school community to parents/ guardians and/ or wider school community to
parents/ guardians facilitate involvement in the facilitate involvement in the wider school community to facilitate involvement in the
Engagement & teaching areas.
and the wider educative process as educative process as facilitate involvement in the educative process but
Personal Growth school community evidenced by 2 or more of evidenced by one MOV no. 1 educative process as received no response/reply
and Professional to facilitate MOV no. 1 or 2 or 2 evidenced by MOV No. 3 as evidenced by MOV No. 3
Development involvement in the Submitted any 4 of the Submitted any 3 of the Submitted any 2 of the Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable evidence was
Efficiency
educative process acceptable MOV* acceptable MOV* acceptable MOV* acceptable MOV shown

Timeliness
10. Participated in Quality Participated in any Participated in any Participated in any Participated in any No acceptable evidence was
professional network/ activity
professional network/ activity professional network/ activity professional network/ activity shown
professional
that requires output* and that requires output* and that requires output* to that does not require
networks to share proof of implementation ** proof of implementation ** share knowledge and to output to share knowledge
knowledge and to within the school to share within the enhance practice as and to enhance practice as
enhance practice knowledge and to enhance department/grade level to evidenced by the submitted evidenced by the submitted
practice as evidenced by theshare knowledge and to MOV MOV
submitted MOV enhance practice as
evidenced by the submitted
MOV
Efficiency Submitted 4 different kinds Submitted 3 different kinds Submitted 2 different kinds Submitted 1 of the No acceptable evidence was
of acceptable MOV*** of acceptable MOV*** of acceptable MOV*** acceptable MOV shown

Timeliness
11. Developed a Quality Updated the Development Discussed progress on the Accomplished the Accomplished the No acceptable evidence was
Plan and approved by the Development Plan with the Development Plan from Strengths and shown
personal
rater during Phase II of the rater to check whether learning objectives up to Development Needs portion
improvement plan RPMS cycle Development Needs were resources needed to address of the Development Plan
based on reflection addressed Development Needs during after self-assessment at the
of one’s practice Phase I of the RPMS cycle beginning of the school year
and ongoing
Efficiency Submitted the IPCRF-DP Submitted the IPCRF-DP Submitted the IPCRF-DP Submitted the IPCRF-DP No acceptable evidence was
professional with any 4 of the with any 3 of the with any 2 of the with any 1 of the shown
learning acceptable Supporting acceptable Supporting acceptable Supporting acceptable Supporting
MOV* MOV* MOV* MOV

Timeliness
5. Plus Factor 12. Performed 12.00% Quality Performed at least 1 related Performed at least 1 related Performed at least 1 related Performed at least 1 related No acceptable evidence was
work/activity that contributed work/activity that contributed work/activity that contributed work/activity that contributed shown
various related
to the teaching-learning to the teaching-learning to the teaching-learning to the teaching-learning
works/ activities process beyond the school/ process within the school/ process within the learning process within the class as
that contribute to Community Learning Community Learning area/ department as evidenced by submitted
the teaching- Center (CLC) as evidenced Center (CLC) as evidenced evidenced by submitted MOV
learning process by submitted MOV by submitted MOV MOV

Efficiency Submitted any 4 of the Submitted any 3 of the Submitted any 2 of the Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable evidence was
acceptable MOV* acceptable MOV* acceptable MOV* acceptable MOV shown
Timeliness

RATING FOR OVERALL ACCOMPLISHMENTS

 TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION
Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave
Basic Education 1. Content 1. RATING
ADJECTIVAL Applied EQUIVALENCES 24.00%
Services Knowledge and knowledge of
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
Pedagogy content within and
4.500 – 5.000 across curriculum Outstanding
3.500 – 4.499 teaching areas. Very Satisfactory
2.500 – 3.499 Satisfactory
1.500 – 2.499 Unsatisfactory
below 1.499 Poor

Ratee Rater Approving Authority