The document provides a rubric for evaluating group presentations with criteria for organization, collaboration, content, and presentation skills. Organization and preparation are assessed on a scale from excellent to poor. Collaboration is evaluated based on how well group members worked from each other's ideas. Content is judged on the amount of valuable material presented. Presentation is scored according to confidence, engagement of the class, and evidence of preparation.
The document provides a rubric for evaluating group presentations with criteria for organization, collaboration, content, and presentation skills. Organization and preparation are assessed on a scale from excellent to poor. Collaboration is evaluated based on how well group members worked from each other's ideas. Content is judged on the amount of valuable material presented. Presentation is scored according to confidence, engagement of the class, and evidence of preparation.
The document provides a rubric for evaluating group presentations with criteria for organization, collaboration, content, and presentation skills. Organization and preparation are assessed on a scale from excellent to poor. Collaboration is evaluated based on how well group members worked from each other's ideas. Content is judged on the amount of valuable material presented. Presentation is scored according to confidence, engagement of the class, and evidence of preparation.
The document provides a rubric for evaluating group presentations with criteria for organization, collaboration, content, and presentation skills. Organization and preparation are assessed on a scale from excellent to poor. Collaboration is evaluated based on how well group members worked from each other's ideas. Content is judged on the amount of valuable material presented. Presentation is scored according to confidence, engagement of the class, and evidence of preparation.
10 pts 8 pts 6 pts 4 pts Organization Excellent Good Fair Poor The presentation The presentation There were The presentation was well had organizing minimal signs of lacked organized, well ideas but could organization or organization and prepared and easy have been much preparation. had little evidence to follow. stronger with of preparation. better preparation. Collaboration Excellent Good Fair Poor The teammates The teammates The teammates The teammates always worked worked from sometimes worked never worked from others’ ideas. others’ ideas most from others’ ideas. from others’ ideas. It was evident that of the time. And However it seems It seems as though all of the group it seems like every as though certain only a few people members did some work, people did not do worked on the contributed but some people as much work as presentation. equally to the are carrying the others. presentation. presentation. Content: Excellent Good Fair Poor Presentation had Presentation had a Presentation had Presentation an exceptional good amount of moments where contained little to amount of material and valuable material no valuable valuable material benefited the was present but as material. and was extremely class. a whole content beneficial to the was lacking. class Presentation Excellent Good Fair Poor Presenters were all Presenters were Presenters were Presenters were very confident in occasionally not consistent with unconfident and delivery and they confident with the level of demonstrated little did an excellent their presentation confidence/ evidence of job of engaging however the preparedness they planning prior to the class. presentation was showed the presentation. Preparation is very not as engaging as classroom but had evident. it could have been some strong for the class. moments