AIAG 2m cava Special Process: Coating System Assessment ‘The cata or peak porornance Version 2. Issued: 02/2012 ABOUT AIAG Purpose Statement Founded in 1982, AIAG is a globally recognized organization where OEMs and suppliers unite to address and resolve issues affecting the worldwide automotive supply chain. AIG's goals are to reduce cost and complexity through collaboration; improve product quality, health, safety and the environment; and optimize speed to market throughout the supply chain AIAG Organization AIAG is made up of a board of directors, an executive director, executives on loan from member companies, associate directors, a full-time staff, and volunteers serving on project teams. Directors, department managers, and program managers plan, direct and coordinate the association's activities under the direction of the executive director. AIAG Projects Volunteer committees focus on business processes or supporting technologies and methodologies. They ‘conduct research and develop, publish, and provide training on standards, conventions, standard business practices, white papers, and guidelines in the areas of automatic identification, CAD/CAM, ED\electronic commerce, continuous quality improvernent, health focus, materials and project ‘management, occupational health & safety, returnable containers and packaging systems, ‘ransportation/customs and truck & heavy equipment. ‘AIAG PUBLICATIONS ‘An AIAG publication reflects @ consensus of those substantially concerned with its scope and provisions. An ‘AIAG publication is intended as a guide to aid the manufacturer, the consumer, and the public. The existence of ‘an AIAG publication does net in any respect preclude anyone from manufacturing, marketing, purchasing, or Using products, processes, or procedures not conforming tothe publication. CAUTIONARY NOTICE AIAG publications are subject to periodic review and users are cautioned to obtain the latest editions. MAINTENANCE PROCEDURE Recognizing that this AIAG publication may not cover al circumstances, AIAG has established @ maintenance procedure. Please refer to the Maintenance Request Farm af tho back of this document to submit a request Published by: Automotive Industry Action Group 126200 Lahser Road, Suite 200 ‘Southfield, Michigan 48033 Phone: (248) 258-3570 + Fax: (248) 358-3253 APPROVAL STATUS The AIAG Quality Steering Committee and designated stakeholders approved this document for publication on Fobruary 7, 2012 AIAG COPYRIGHT AND TRADEMARK NOTICE: (© 2012 Automotive Industry Action Group, excopt that copyright s nat claimed asf any port ofan eriginal work prepared by a US. oF state goverment oficer or employee as pat ofthe person's fea dues EExcapt as noted above, al ghts ar reserved by AIAG and ro pat of hese materials may be reproduce. eorted, stored in a retivalsystom, or transmit, m any frm or by any means, electronic. photocopying, recaring, oF etherwse, witout the prior writen pormission of AutomotveIndusty ‘Acton Group. Copyright infringement 8 violation of federal law sutyect a chm and cv penaies. [AIAG and Automotive Industry Acton Group are registred sevice marks of he Autometie Industry Acton Group, Automotive industry Action Group ‘makes no claim fo any rademark a @ hs par. Trademarks of hd pares inuded in these mater are the property 0! respective one's (©2012 Automotive Industry Action Group ISBN: 978-1-60534-245-0-90000caxtz AIAG 2» Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 ‘The cata for peak performance CHANGES TO CQI-12 2" EDITION The Special Process: Coating System Assessment, 2™ edition contains some new requirements, changed requirements and clarifications that the supplier organization will need to consider in making its self- assessment. This 2” edition is a collaborative work of OEM, Tier | suppliers, and coating suppliers. Below is a summary of the important changes in this 2” edition. L New Process Tables have been added: © PTJ: Anodizing + PTL: Part Inspection and Testing 2. Process Tables have been renamed: * Table C: Conversion Coatings (Phosphate, Non-phosphate, Chromate, Non-chrome) * Table E: Spray * Table H: Autodeposition © Table I: Cure Equipment has been moved to Process Table K. 4. The format and layout of the Process Tables have been improved to facilitate the coating system assessment 5. The following sections contain the most significant updates or changes: * Section 1: Special Process: Coating Process Assessment (General Facility Overview) © Question 1.8: Does the coater collect and analyze data over time, and react to this data? Are records available? The analysis of products and processes over time can yield vital information for defect prevention efforts. The organization shall have a system to collect, analyze, and react to product or process data over time. Methods of analysis shall include ongoing trend or historical data analysis of special product or process parameters. The organization shall determine which parameters to include in such analysis. All process control and testing records must be retained for a minimum of one calendar year after the year in which they were created. * Section 2: Floor and Material Handling Responsibility © Question 2.15: Lighting of Inspection Area © Question 2.16: Are the water rinse control plans up to date and reflect best case practices? + Process Tables A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, 1, and J: have expanded the Category/Process Steps along with changes in the “Monitoring Frequency” column. © Process Table K: Equipment has updates to columns: “EQUIPMENT TYPE;” “Verification Frequency,” and “Calibration / Certification Frequency.”AIAG2a cal-12 Special Process: Coating System Assessment The catayt for pak pertormanco Version 2. Issued: 02/2012 FOREWORD Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG) committees are made up of volunteers from member companies in the automotive industry. The work of preparing process audits is done by AIAG techn committees, al The main task of technical committees is to prepare Automotive Standards and System Requirements, Draft documents adopted by the technical committees are circulated to the Steering Committee for review and consensus approval. Publication of the documents requires approval by the Quality Steering Committee. ‘The Quality Steering Committee would like to acknowledge and thank the following individuals and their companies who have contributed time and effort to the development of this document. Acknowledgements Jim Aide Acadian Group Brian Glowacki Atotech USA, Inc. Jeff Szotek Chrysler Group LLC Kimberly Tress Chrysler Group LLC Murli Prasad Dipsol of America, Inc. Albert Gelles Doerken Corporation Larry Xu Ford Motor Company Steven Kwong General Motors Company Ron Doran Henkel Technologi Elizabeth Hanna Howard Finishing, LLC Jamie Brooks Magni Industries Craig Barboza Modem Plating Corporation Harish Bhatt Metalast International, Inc. Karen Whitmore AIAGcaut2 AIAG» Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 The catayst for peak performance TABLE OF CONTENTS ABOUT AIAG FOREWORD ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. ‘TABLE OF CONTENTS. Genenat PROCESS APPROACH, COATING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT GOALS... ASSESSMENT PROCESS. ‘ASSESSOR QUALIFICATIONS. Omer REQUIRENENTS. 1 cori 1.1 Generat 1.2 APPLICATION. 2 THE COATING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE. © VN N anne eww 3 SPECIAL PROCESS: COATING ASSESSMENT. ‘APPENDIX A ~ PROCESS TABLES. GLOSSARY ssnAIAG car-t2 Special Process: Coating System Assessment The catalyst or peak performance Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 INTRODUCTION General The work of preparing Special Process: Coating System Assessment (CSA), Second Edition, was carried out through the AIAG Coating Work Group. These coating requirements are complementary to customer and product standards, The CSA can be used to assess an organization's ability to meet the requirements in this assessment, as well as customer, regulatory, and the organization's own requirements. The CSA can also be used between an organization and its suppliers. In the CSA, the word “shall” indicates a requirement for purposes of the self assessment. Failure to meet the requirements results in an assessment that is either “Not Satisfactory” or “Needs Immediate Action”, The word “should” indicates a recommendation. Where the term “such as” is used, any suggestions given are for guidance only. Process Approach The CSA supports the automotive process approach as described in ISO/TS 16949. Coating System Assessment Goals The goal of the CSA is the development of a coating management system that provides for continual improvement, emphasizing defect prevention and the reduction of variation and waste in the supply chain. The CSA, coupled with an internationally recognized quality management system and applicable customer-specific requirements, defines the fundamental requirements for coating management systems. ‘The CSA is intended to provide a common approach to a coating management system for automotive production and service part organizations, Assessment Process ‘Ongoing assessments shall be conducted annually, unless otherwise specified by the customer, to reexamine the continuing compliance with the CSA. Each assessment shall include a review of the organization's systems using the CSA. Successive Job Audits (Section 3.0 of this document) shall parts from different automotive component manufacturers that require complian: ample to the CSA document The assessment shall use the process approach to auditing/assessing as identified by the requirements of ISO/TS 16949. Assessor Qualifications Assessor(s) shall have the following specific experience to conduct the COATING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT:canta AIAG Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 The catalyst for peak performance 1. Bean experienced quality management system (QMS) internal auditor (for example, ISO/TS 16949, ISO 9001) 2. Assessor shall possess coating knowledge. Evidence shall include a minimum of 5 years of experience in coating or a combination of formal chemical education and coating experience totaling a minimum of 5 years. 3. Assessor shall possess knowledge of and be familiar with the application of automotive quality core tools including statistical process control, measurement systems analysis, part approval, failure mode and effects analysis, and advanced quality planning. Note: If more than one assessor is required to meet the above qualifications, the lead assessor shall be the person meeting the requirements in #1 Other Requirements ‘The organization shall keep records as evidence of compliance to the requirements identified in the CSA, as well as all appropriate action plans to address any unsatisfactory ratings. These records shall be readily available for review by any customer requiring compliance to the requirements within this document.AIAG a cav2 Special Process: Coating System Assessment The cates for peak perfomance Version 2, issued: 02/2012 1 SCOPE 1.1 General This document specifies process requirements for an organi tion or its suppliers performing applicable coating, who need to: © demonstrate ability to consistently provide product that meets customer and applicable regulatory requirements, and ‘© enhance customer satisfaction through the effective application of the system, including processes for continual improvement of the system. ‘The Coating System Assessment is applicable to sites where customer and/or service are processed throughout the automotive supply chain. parts for production 1.2 Application All requirements of the CSA are generic and are intended to be applicable to all organizations performing the coating operations addressed in this document, regardless of type, size, and product. Twelve Process Tables have been developed and the appropriate table(s) is to be referenced during the assessment, The Process Tables are specific to Coating processes as noted below: ‘+ Process Table A — Pretreatment (Aqueous) © Process Table B — Pretreatment (Mechanical) '* Process Table C ~ Conversion Coatings (Phosphate, Non-phosphate, Chromate, Non- chrome) * Process Table D ~ Powder © Process Table Spray ~ Blectrocoat + Process Table * Process Table G — Dip/Spin ‘© Process Table H — Autodeposition Process Table 1 ~ Cure * Process Table J - Anodizing and Hard Coat Anodizing Process Table K ~ Equipment ‘Process Table L ~ Part Inspection and Testing, These Process Tables contain requirements for: 1. Process and Test Equipment 2. Process Monitor Frequencies 3. In-Process/Final Test FrequenciescaQl-12 Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2. issued: 02/2012 4. Test Frequencies The Process Tables specify the tolerances of process paramete control parameters and parts. The Requirements and C when to refer to the Process Tables. and the frequencies for checking proces lance in the CSA form will notify the assessorAIAG 2 caut2 Special Process: Coating System Assessment ‘The cata for peak performance Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 2 THE COATING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE 6, Obtain current copy of CQI-12 Special Process: Coating System Assessment, 2™ edition from AIAG. Identify all coating processes to which CQI-12 Special Process: Coating System Assessment, edition applies (see CQI-12, 1.2). Record these processes on the CSA. ‘Complete the CSA, determining the level of compliance. A minimum of one job audit (Section 3) shall be performed during each assessment. ‘Address each “Not Satisfactory” item and determine corrective action, including root cause analysis and implementation of the corresponding corrective action(s). The corrective action(s) shall be completed within 90 days. Records of the corrective action, including verification, shall be maintained. “Needs Immediate Action” requires immediate containment of suspect product. Address each “Needs Immediate Action” item and determine corrective action(s), including root cause analysis and implementation of the corresponding corrective action(s). The corrective action(s) shall be completed within 90 days. Records of the corrective action, including verification, shall be maintained. “Number of Process Table items identified as failed in Comments/Observation column” to be reported, Assessments shall be conducted annually.caQl-12 Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, issued: 02/2012 3 SPECIAL PROCESS: COATING ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE COVER SHEET. B COVER PAGE wenn INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING SECTIONS 1 AND CCoarine SysTEMs ASSESSMENT: SECTION 1-MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY AND QUALITY PLANNING. 15 id COATING SySTEMS ASSESSMENT: SECTION 2- FLOOR AND MATERIAL HANDLING RESPONSIBILITY. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE JOB AUDIT. aiaT JOB AUDIT... 10AIAG a canta Special Process: Coating System Assessment The cata for peak performance Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 Instructions for completing the Cover Sheet 12, Facility Name: Name of the facility being assessed. One form shall be used for each facility The facility may have several buildings or physical locations in the same general area. If there is a separate management team (Quality Manager and Metallurgist) or different management system, then these locations shall be considered as separate facilities Address: The street address of the facility being assessed; P.O. Box numbers may be given as additional information. Phone Number: The phone number of the facility. If there is no common phone number for the facility, the phone number of the Operations Manager or Quality Manager shall be used. Fax Number: The fax number of the facility. Number of Coating Employees at this Facility: The number of employees, salaried and hourly, associated with the coating operation at this facility Captive Coater (Y/N): Enter “Y” if this facility coats components for their own company. Enter “N” if the company does not coat any components for their own company. ‘Commercial Coater (Y/N): Enter “Y” if this facility coats components for companies other than their own company. Enter “N” if this facility does not coat any components for other companies Date of Assessment: Enter the date(s) of the assessment. An alphanumeric format shall be used to avoid confusion with different numeric formats. Example: May 3 — 4, 2012. Date of Previous Assessment: List the date of the previous Special Process: Coating System Assessment of this facility. Date of Re-assessment (if necessary): If “Not Satisfactory” findings were observed from the original assessment, then the coater shall address each item and determine correct action, including root cause analysis and implementation of the corresponding corrective action(s). The date of the re-assessment shall be given here, and the appropriate Question(s) from Sections 1 in the original assessment, shall be modified to reflect that the evidence, relating to the implementation of the corrective action(s), has been observed. In addition, the “Number of Not Satisfactory Findings” shall be modified as appropriate. 3 ‘Type(s) of Coating at this Facility: Place a checkmark to designate all coating process(es) performed at this facility. This information determines the appropriate Process Table that shall be used during the assessment. Processes not listed on the cover sheet are not part of the Coating ‘System Assessment. Current Quality Certification(s): The coater shall list their current quality certifications, e.g., ISO/TS 16949, ISO 9001. Certifications may be from 3rd party sources or customer quality certifications. If customer quality certification is given, then the year of the last assessment by the customer shall also be given. Personnel Contacted: List the name(s), title(s), phone number(s), and email address(es), if available, of the principal participants from the coater’s organization. Auditors/Assessors: List the name(s), Company(ies), phone number(s) and email address(es), if available, of the auditor(s). Number of “Not Satisfactory” Findings: Enter the number of “Not Satisfactory” findings observed during the assessment.caQl-12 Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2 Issued 02/2012 16. Number of “Needs Immediate Action” Findings: Enter the number of “Needs Immediate Action” findings observed during the assessment. Number of “Fail” Findings in the Job Audit(s): from the job audit. ter the number of “Fail” findings observed Number of Process Table items identified as failed in Comments/Observation column: Enter the number of failed findings observed in the completed process tables.AIAG The catast or peak partormarce COVER PAGE cal-12 Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 [Special Process: Coating System Assessment 2nd Edition Foci Nanas [adsense Phone Number Fax Norber Number ot Coating Erpioyees ats Fach Cape Comer {Commercial Coster (7 Dae of Assasement Daa o Previous Rasosanent [Curent uaiy Carineanony [ate of Re-accnsarent (I necessary [Personnel Contes [rare amber of Wat Satatacony Fa umber of Needs mediate Raton Fi Number of Far Figs athe Job ADAMS) [Humbe of Process Table Rema nol necting Minimum Ri of Coating Processes at this Fac [Process Table A DPrevestmert, AqueDvs [Process Table B [Preveatment Mechanical [conversion Coat [Process Table D [Power Coat [Process Table © [Process Table F Elecrocost [process Table. Si [Process Table H [astose Process Table! cure. Process TabieT [anode semeat ess Table PartincaQl-12 Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 The catalyst for peak performance Instructions for completing Sections 1 and 2 Sections 1 - 2 contain questions and the requirements and guidance for each question. The Sections are: ‘The assessor shall assess the coater’s compliance to Sec Section 1 - Management Responsibility & Quality Planning Section 2 ~ Floor and Material Handling Responsibility ns | and 2 by comparing the evidence presented by the coater to the requirements listed in the “Requirements and Guidance” column. 14 NOTE 1 NOTE 2; NOTE 3: NOTE 4: In the “Requirements and Guidance” column, the word “shall” indicates a requirement and the term “such as” indicates that any suggestions given are for guidance only. ‘The “Requirements and Guidance” column will indicate to the assessor when the Process Tables are pertinent to the Questions. When the Process Tables are pertinent to the Question, the assessor shall assess the coater’s compliance to the specified section(s) in the Process Tables. If the question is not applicable to the coater, then the assessor shall place a checkmark in the “N/A” Assessment column. If the observed evidence is in compliance to the question, the assessor shall note the evidence in the “Objective Evidence” column and place a check mark in the “Satisfactory” column. If the observed evidence is not in complian to the question, then the assessor shall note the non-compliance in the “Objective Evidence” column and place a check mark in the “Not Satisfactory” column. Where nonconforming product is identified in the assessment of a given question the assessor shall place a check mark in the “Needs Immediate Action” (NIA) column. NIA requires immediate containment of suspect product.caQl-12 Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 The catayst for peak pertomarce and Qualit Coating Systems Assessment: Section 1-Management Responsibilit Plannin: ‘pawoaroop oq eauund Aero pooverse] hed asieos au soa] Prouerpe peep esyodioon mys 102 a] sovayoce Buns pu voweane enue -o von Cuseoo page| fue patepap ea 5 a a iueid Aujend pue Ayiqisuodsoy juowabeuew - } UONseS won pout sp 00n “onesies ‘uoraessnes |v oouepia enstao, ‘uepino pur suawaibey (mousono Auises 1e19v99) waUissassy warshs BuIneod :ss900I¢ leedsThe catalyst or peak performance AIAG 2» Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 caQl-12 sone} sse0oig 94) pais swewionnbes nurs a panssunaop eo osn ou sesodcou yeus 8809 24 ‘worsesnes 2N “yan 94 u passarppe pur ‘pause [etsouoop wo 98n eiaesodioau neus 91800 oud] 22uepino pue swawasnboy (manseng Autioeg fesoue9) wuawssassy warskg Buneod :sseood jeI9edg turooyor pue aep 01 dn suet xd sani $01009 0 84 16cal-12 Special Process: Coating System Assessment ‘Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 The catalyst for peak performance ‘ss20oid vanum eau vison seu foowersnes [win s2uepiea ennoolgo, aouepno pue swweweu!nbex onsen | ony owes sveauiy spe0n | ION = (marnseno Au 119U9D) WoUNSsossy WO}Skg BuNeOD :ss920I¢ [ees 7The catayt fr peak performance ‘Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 CQl-12 2989 Ovi Ou voy | Monesnes ‘pou spe] 10N ——— aay orsernes |v souapina oansefao (marniong huey 1210U99) wowssessy Wa)shs BuNeod :sso201d 1e!20dg 18cQl-12 Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 The catalyst fr poak pertormanco AIAG Tans oouert] wou javayew 0 vousodse| ‘34 a2veupne oou8so9 0 s6evew Kuno ou $909] eveiew ounuerenb vorsods] 01 jauuossed seudasdde Cuiweuroop pue Buzvowne| 19) asuodsau 5) 20u6ssp 0 bevy A we ws enuuco 1) ss200.4 auyop 1eyssre00 ou ‘psn oa reus| ‘iruoove0 ous peoidée Bumos worgoxd poundooip 20, we ‘Bujweofvesseo0u 94 BunoU9pjousosiedpeouipo) ‘paenb fa panss 12us ot opmeur yous weeks weuaBeveu Aner ou} ony opens sean ‘horses soueping an soueping pue swauesnbe uonsanp compels epann|\ Toa snes |v pina eanselao pIn9 Pt u sanean ee (marns9ng Asie je19U99) yWoulssassy wie}sKg BuNeo9 :sse00id eI90dg 19The catayst for peak performance awwosied payed} Bune 1 Basen aahoue Suypioid wewodeueu Twowesnes, 2N oesnes |i 2ouaping anneiao, souepino pue swawannboy Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 caQl-12 (mamiang Armor, 1219U99) juouIssossy waiskg Buneod :sse201d [elDads yon 0 sampeacid sou a} ‘vojsono 20CcaQl-12 Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, issued: 02/2012 ‘The cata for pook pertormance ‘suondrusip vowanposd azn oi ‘sued vans Amgoyene ow ansva veus pue ii sued nub @ yee U8 djanapweys 301009 ous) fowessnes 108 Aaowessnes |i s2uepia ear2eta0 ‘ouivanaud powuownoop e oney yous 1869 ou] wwowasnbou 1 qumstond souevowseu ‘nora # 04 si vvonseno eau lwonseno} a (marron, ey [e19UH) JUaUISsessy WeIshg BUNeOD :SS2901dThe catalyst or peak performance Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 caQl-12 Coating Systems Assessment: Section 2- Floor and Material Handling Responsibility ‘ouejduco jo eauapne Bue s9sse00x4 peteunooq| ony “oressnes. er wn Ri qnaisuodsoy BuijpueH [eWOVeN PUE 10015 - 7 WORDSS souspit3 eanrelgo s2uepino pur sows "qu (manseng Ayi19e4 Je10U0D) uoUIssassy Wa}Skg BuNeOD :sseo0ud 1eIDeds 22cal-12 Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2. ssued: 02/2012 Tha catalyst for peok performance ‘ua0u09 Aen sou J0 @Bewep wed 46s] _efwenb npord ansosai| 4 passasse aq neus sseoad Guddus pu Guinuey| "oj sienbope CuBeped] 6° ss200%-swo}sAs Bupequn,upen| sy2t800 aus] _pue eCecs ‘Gonpuey as cane Jamod Bupnpr faustuous| woud ue Jo wana] ez ‘uy seses Aiea aurtunop favotiewe 0 peuverdun| ‘syp019 79 Fouanbay 29 SL e890 010) pan pue pawounoop| ‘7s peo jypods Oupeo ued a] £2 pue spe 20 syed apnpu sauer ‘poy,nioa pue| _POUPPAS Oupeor Hed si ‘awawnoop‘paycads oq Heys spiawered Oupeo} youderdaou ysoueues ery] 9% 1 904 29 neus Pnpo1d owoIsnD Bujpuey souewe9| sued poo5] vercabupyn ved Kax9 Jo} ne00 yous] Avodaxtu 0 pausiun| s3yod den xyes jo Cuoyuoy “ousnboyss320% ee \oe2 0) swood den ‘nv cr sompsoexd pawaune woney Jove e2uepieg ann ean asus epee soorsessnes. [ym fpr an20/G0) onsen (marasono Aine 1e12ua9) woussassy woIshs GuNeod :ss990I¢ [eIDadgThe catayst for peok performance Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 CQl-12 ‘19949 jo fouonbay 10} sogeL 8580014 090 epayuoy wournbo set anpad si ‘sajge soon} esa}ae4 ss2001d u poyoods| 1,04 ‘sages sss001g u poypeds se pauuoyad] se powoyed soouenbaia) eL-z oaueus seouenbaud eo, eg /see00ig-] (80 jeu / 890014 a¥| 221 porea poe pomones Siaueed) 212 veo yoadsqosuc> jo no ay] esajaes sseoni wr poypeds sezuenbea) sad parojuow sijewese| roaucoss2ooud ay] chard parosdus pus ano 0 saonpu0o} suowpuee Bupyom pve] ov rewouosrve Sudsoxosno4 ‘ssounveop werd ay pur ewauosnus‘Sudooyesnoy ‘ssoumueer Wei) _ SS oe aecnel sequin ony Towesnes, foorsesse souaping anna soueping pue swowssinboy uwonsonm eis saay| OO snes |v pina aana0fao pmo Soon (mornieng fiiges 1e10U95) wowssassy waIsAs Bunjeod :ss92014 1e!90ds 24caQl-12 Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 10 essaoou es0um posn sate payin ‘ysods Yeo v0 edu} Se emendope herb sown ous (aygeoydde 9) amveadua pou 09 (ge) 9) von | ony 1 $B20N s2ueping annoafa0 sounping pur swewssinbey es eave vopoodsu yo open) The catayst for peak performance (marsono Aytoe4 12009) JudWissessy WoIshs BuNeOD :sse001d 1e199dSon AIAG 2a Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 Tho catalyst for peak pertomance Instructions for completing the Job Audit The organization is to complete a minimum of one coating part job audit during each assessment, This, should be done preferably on a part identified for one of the customers requiring compliance to this document. More part job audits may be done if time permits. Preferably, safety or critical parts should be audited. This may not be easily determined with fasteners, especially if the fastener manufacturer does not identify the end customer (auto manufacturer, tier one, etc.). It is recommended that the job audit be performed at the end of the coating system assessment. The job audit is not the only or main focus of the CSA. The other two sections on Management Responsibility and Quality Planning, Floor and Material Handling Responsibility, are equally ifnot even ‘more important. The job audit of one part, one coating process, is not sufficient to use as a basis to complete the other sections of the complete CSA. The job audit is a compliance type audit/review of a specific part and its related paperwork and processing, including coating equipment and processing records for that job from the beginning receipt of 4 part through processing in the coating operation and inspection to packaging. Parts shall be taken from the shipping area at the dock or the end of the coating operation. If'an automotive manufacturer's part is not available ot identifiable, then parts from other customers requiring compliance with this document shall be used for the assessment. The specific coating processing parameters (applies to 3.7 in the Job Audit) that are required in the job audit shall be added to the job audit form. This can be done by reviewing the customer specification(s), the Control Plan, the FMEA, and the floor work/job order. Each processing step shall be reviewed for proper production records/compliance/inspection. These steps can be compared to those in the Coating System Assessment for the actual job/coating process being reviewed for compliance.cal-12 Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 The catalyst fr peak performance Job Audit e3| esiuewunba| Uuonsedsur jonpoud ou) ave 1eunh| ee YN / Hes 1380 (eouaping ennvelgo) ‘uonipued jeny 49 19p10 (dous) wowounboy yeusaqu} 10 soars s#uonseno vs poveioe, lvogsend wpny gor #uogsonp, ssquawasinboy Buneos ‘suopdusseg weg ‘uequiny wed ‘uaquiny 49pip doys ‘ueworsno UST TOTThe catalyst or peak performance AIAG 2a ‘Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 caQl-12 ‘ajdines jo voRDeeS| “Aguenb 19 Fouanbayy 91] owen sei (orgeaide 3) uoysuay. anbvo, quaweunboy ypads Sejdures 70 wonDeI95| TRauenb 10 Fouerban; 01 owen 524 ang wewemnben| _S8e voneaypedg| see saydues 0 voRPans| Tend 79 Rousnban 91 @ponew we| Toseupy wewemnbeul yee woweayseds| SS) “haver® 16 Fouanbesy 604 Wwouremnbeou vonewouinoed 10,0910 (dous) aor (eouapirg onnoeigo) Uuogipued jenay Bias oe uoRsend upny gor |# uonsen ia eves squswevinboy Buneoo uondusseg wed sequinn Wed sequin 49p10 dous eworsng RORTEPT TOT 30CcaQl-12 Special Process: Coating System Assessment AIAG Version 2, lssued: 02/2012 Tha catays for pook prtormance oneayDeds| ‘Sajauies jo voHDe/0S| | ‘hnuend 10 Kouenbey power 1884 rnVBIODECD ‘S801 pue 10109 uauleund9y| ‘uoneayoeds| ‘sajduves j0 voRDe/85| ‘Rguenb 10 Fovenban 1894] | Powe see ojduies jo voRD|aS| ‘quan 16 Fevenbas 194] powers 1894 TenTeTooeC) soueTeaady_wouemnbeu] Tet ‘voReypeds| (eouapina onmalgo) Uvogipued reny qwouenbey uuopewewnsog souerajou J0.20p10 (doys) aor #uoasend vSO 21 uuonsent mae ‘vopseno wpny aor #uonseno ssuawaunbey Buneoy suondusseg wed oquinn ued aequiny s0pi0 dous aworsng AARTPT ‘melee Jonpodd POUsIULd - PMY Gor - ¢ UOHIeS 31The catalyst or paak porermance Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 cal-12 n ut ore me s ex oe 22 | ute xo sno morse on ri Taga rvodsn opoaaN 8 ORG oa Tepe wong Tare an Sonar ee ag (eouaprng @anselqo) queweinbey # UORSEND WSO arog sin vorerovenvacr | rvensro away en ‘aan 8 ‘onipuoD jeney jap1o (dous) gor me sie :squowauinboy Buneo9 ‘wonduoseg weg ‘uoquiny weg dequiny s9p10 doug ‘owes TOT AST mainey yonPoid PEYsiUs - PNY gor - ¢ YORDeScaQl-12 Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2. Issued: 02/2012 _2uoweure}u0d 10 sy0iqo ereudorddeu 8 J0 004 siourewuoo amar) re “renpinipu pazuoune| out te Aq poubis uogeaynes ou sem} SE vz we we ‘24 Pip Poyti9® sem 10ps0 ou ont ‘2110001 10 Gursse001de st ‘maye voeoyipeds BuiwienoB ay saoq) © epazvowne foul 2, ‘210M “pauvoped o10m sdons jeuoNIppe I i or eid] rh renuo9 ow ul pewouncop jou arom) 44 ¢ z 84 peuuoyied suogesodorsde apna Ons ene jawaunbe ‘uoasent “Conesrenoy” | wmmwwarcegawwens | eumiroimuamng |" pawn vonson0 wy aor 004 20.1910 (4048) Gor The catalyst for peak performance i ttuotsesinb0y 5une09 uoseq ued — TT requ eg soquuny s0p19 doug OT craic sRUApT aor ‘Motnoy JoNPOJY poUsiuld - PNY Gor ¢ UOHOES, 33The cata or peak performance AIAG» ‘Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 Ccal-12 BS _epajeqe| Ayodord siouleyuco ayy 10m] OZ E se Gpoinvep fvodoxtaved om arom) eve ‘swuewasnbay Buiddiys| ee 12 ave 82 6z 1 epoywuep{ swouemnbes Cubeyred ery] 20't az siuawaninboy BuiberDe| 25 TvouTembee ieee ayes nee ruenseno veo uonsan0 very gor #vonseno 12 19910 (deus) aor a sttiotratinboy Sun805, TT trond 509 He —_— FF oo tin 0 orton 20ps0 dus SS usenoreno, RUSTE mainay onpoid Paul ey mupiogns ae wojeq uaa sw2u8snbe (snoonby) 1uewneeneid -VFTGVL SSIOOUM 37The catast for peak performance AIAG 2 een gta og] Tervenrnacir] oe ‘page sourungeu sngeuoiet nl rerun ve ep nd ous tn feu a ror momo ta Bussum sone ne nr ou] ssrueroseucery| vw mess) ‘wormpuon emoy umwemnbey wnaenin vonpuog iemioy | Manuneen ‘sumumvognonnes9g fovanbany Bove reaoo 0 2h, saa eesoiaitnsineg veo. | um sai "oyun joie an pies Eunsoddne apron ur jou we swousnber wnanun siamunanbes mucyans 9 ununjun eos Aiea ye ope me qo BUNK Um 9 eooUETbNY mm mE LoNPedeW “Ee sueuMebe uIP aay Am euEYEND Mu ‘umuninbss ayosds icine oj yrupiegns se wojeg uen6 unsure Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 CcaQl-12 (snoenby) wewyeasied - FFTOVI SSSOOU 38cal-12 ‘Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2. Issued: 02/2012 The catalyst for peak performance omen mo] meee nn eaomnened ce mamas mal on om —— zi cama mal ie a = oa onvetna ee mo a ow ae 3 speed | Seteey | -mabeiiane. [matinee | ee —aamnane ae aaa corners son (snoenby) quowneanarg - YFTEVI SSIOOUd 39cal-12 Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 Tho cata for poak performance mo acim = ml cn ” avian ema = —veaaunen ™ ae z sna vm a oo See 2 faimiiee | sesore | soiarimimee | memes: | MSRM as am aaa aaacaaies S| a ‘sumnpine eine Anan spe: Buvadane opHon uu ev mune wana suo, monn Bums 9 Ay YE OVP YPRE Ql ey Um mp ewuonboy ENSURE HeNsed 6 enn INbo! LONRpE ane eu! uRrED aA {snoanby) wouneosiesd - TFTGVI SSIOOWI 40caQl-12 Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2 Issued: 02/2012 The catayst for pook portormarco Process Table B: Pretreatment (Mechanical) earn sia reine re real | | ea weisows Iva nave] w vonpueoiemey | wmuainbey uruin 4 | mownynbey umunral sumaeononenoeag ‘ovnbarg Busowon venue ot sang esata 9 es onunjon es fea vere oy ge a Buonnd v2 eocuarbn suoupe ere Ano pas Buuedane apex Youu (ve2queyooqy) wouneaniaug - TITEVL SSIOOUS 41caQl-12 Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, issued: 02/2012 The catalyst for pook performance ‘wramnace . ‘oy | a8 epow Cueeg| 04 y ime sic sun] no sescuseue meoqe He ae sok gine sig ven eons een we vewpueomney | wauetexsiminan | vonpueammoy |rauemey urna swouwoawonmnesa ova tayomon en sig eevciahoboneg veo | ewe ‘suojypaos erie Asn 0 spv2es Buuedans apwnon!u iu oe snus urna, snimuynbes ayers of Bawojue> ay09 fyu8 RS HP au "yPNE go ak BOE La 2p ‘souanbey yes EuRse] UeyPEdsU“B> syoUIUNE UOPPE ane Kew WorEN wl ‘niwsynbes oyede wono 1 geupiogns se moyeg umn esse | (jeoqueysoyy) suouneonaig - ITAVI SSIOOUcal-12 Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 The catalyst for pook performance Process Table C: Conversion Coatings seve ui emma renuenisscr| mnaueuso eur) snag uo om] acon] soomeyanaai aenaiy nT momar) outros at Bases nyt a ps ean] amu] ~ mmo nt cur 9 tue] rung] DREAMY td set ote be SSSSeere nnn eovretern neooet pet peaeenn va * “ smaoreuoonaucs musnronrremal PE | 1S tearea wearer] m eapHeo emo oun ursont wenpuooienoy fuewenniny unum FOE ‘vomiting aumevon ene e ath seg noeigote 2. | su ‘eonpcs ene nt eps Sodas spvend uov om ehewnunoar unum romano mers 6 Suey> a> Kos pe one an Ganja Ly NeCLAREN me tink used“ Ne HONE Any fs ee (owory2-uon ‘srewouyg ‘eyeudsoyd-uoy ‘eyeydso4d) s6une0D Uo!ssenuon- THEW SISO 43caQl-12 AIAG 2» Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2. issued: 02/2012 The catalyst or peak porormance ‘arog Ame ong} ‘vet puede Mes 9 Buco sv see] a waueinae mcrae seme (ocean 229 warp] #00 tig oon ao] sewn 60 ‘roy havo aug mumamiony] +0 nou yh sug seve mieuery| se setevy wou enc oo amucen| ron syeonrund oun} 09 sa peronsy prensa pus pscuna 8 enoosen| tena 9h ou saeunny| mnebyaneei 19 ‘Wea Bannon vomnnn9| oe wm ymeasssea) | worpu0g enoy muon nan vonpuog emoy | weuasboy unary FITS smunogyoneneego fownbeig Bavowson, reaven yas sg sree vo | wow ‘umn ref Siaoj09 | mo> fyi mye onpne a Ypne gol Buao}ied a4 28 seovanbay mens ‘une used BAU “u2unbesaypeds mucins 02 (ewory2-voN ‘eewosyo ‘eeudsoud-uon ‘e1eydsoud) sunvoy UoIss9AuoD - TFTEV SSIOOUd a4CQli-12 Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, lsued: 02/2012 ‘The catayst or peak performance onsnd og evan] ero sou g hens eo] amor] ro eres g hte og rerumuaeuony| vn w wmrvesisea — | vonpuen eresy wou onto unary woupuog enoy _|uoussnbey unurun sumuucowopenegg sovanbog avonon emg oa dog st2orahotoirs vs | ou “suvupuoo ere Aol spoes Bupsodine apnoea joao Husumanba nara. -nuswnynbor mucins of Banos 80 a8 es JN a yp ol BOLE Uo4 2 eon mee BunAm YonaKdN roe uaa ane hrs shunwaynbes pede muerens ol meuproans ai Moja v9 SU (eworyo-uon *a Jonyg ‘eieydsoyd-uony ‘eieydsoyd) s6uneod UoIssenuoD - SFTEVI SSIOOUd 45The cata or peak performance AIAG peepee aman poten og z90 049 hss og] amarry| puaains pur pecuou a anedun ny 90 Taeayeay noo) w ‘onsat 200 =a veo mrorpaps aunpesi val 1 +50 ssnoy9 hse og] ane eupoiyarpepues eouno| £90 sa pombe:ypmonte pe prcwna asean nope aug] promarnsory veneaasveg wows] r50 spon eu] sean] aby on v0 Teiaondae peewee] o 4 epuco ery |rssauntoy una sumuueowoarveego musa dg esaorgtntaveg v9. | sum "suompuos ene hase pion: Bajedans oppor wu ou ae aubusdrias unum snuoendor owen oy Baucqies nye ban joys eyene gene ae ms Buoyed uu, 22 sBDUANbRY ENA BaREN YoRSade e ‘nuMunnnbe, LOUIE Anny Ar awOHE® OA Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 CcQl-12 (ewo142-von ‘eiewo1y9 ‘areydsoud-uoN ‘axeydsoud) s6uneod uoIsia\U0g - SFTEV SSIOOd 46caQl-12 Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 The catalyst or peak perfomance Process Table D: Powder ea pr nd me enum] tet mone a dm poten] 112 neta ms ou runt] ssonup man yop ne pw ey van soy ea m wmyamarsera) | erpawmoy nwamoey nay wonpueareny—[iveunanbey earn romeo ea, sing sosigioters =, ‘ooucs pace el ose unde nord yu ov aw sunuber uma npn apn ola fain va eeu ae gpd Be nce sop ey eu HN ‘suousenbeoypeds aos eh amogn wn aseg ei unset} Buneog sopmog - TSTAVI SSIOOWd a7The catalyst for peak performance AIAG totwron woes ay seu | sins sep womnpad ove ee ee seauroay re aos wan 44 uw suns sano as ey yd pu sao ce yon pag a bun ur sania oyu) founnbens Basonven ‘sing sovsesgivoseeo veo. | suey pm “suoupoos erie Aslospiobe Buguoddneopond wu ou wt sumunnbes wun | “sysunynbasounens 0 Souuojs ies Ayn jeyeowpne om Ypme ge sy BuuMoped way ‘esuaNBay saI8 Bune vonsogsy “Baybee Kel AEN 2] -umumnbasoyoads moto of seupiegns ee moje ul usunenbe Special Process: Coating System Assessment ‘Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 CQl-12 Suneod sepmod - TITAVI SSIOOUd 48caQl-12 Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 sou gto vou san tupnde ono rn ou pun vont vat ate Pi xe pur wagon ve ato sanurwoeeuer ‘pou! soa 0 oy apne wu} renvenoemver| nsoynde pu veoe sa ae] ‘econ time > mt ee ve ps voonpad ome rerumcimucny] —pommpmigregemedeauieummgecu] tte | 62 woapeegrensy —fruowonnboy unanay Avanrg Savon mg yw sang ssaseghiobaeg Ye | suo iojapuas ene Ano poe Boss opovd eu bw svausbey wnann swnuabes swore Bones me KA es npn a4 HONE Qa sa Baoped wn, saDuebay see Bunse veNDed "' suauIMbe NNpe ane Lu aUONED m4 suoumumdas sede ouoysn 0 eeprogns oe moje ua sv euRNDS The cata for peak performance Suneod sepmog - TFTGVI SSIOWM 49caQl-12 Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 The catalyst or peak performance Taw semana wales] 704 ghar oe] ary) ony toe] enn anann voupuaayeny | mununbey unannn] ‘fovanbasg bosonvon sng ssonigiobong wo | ua “seo mae An on ps4 Buds mest rou av sour wnat ‘svn ssoyen Baqi m6 Ae yeu oun a Yone gf Buje uA eHDLARba Re Eaem UoMsNN “re eoMANNe: CRE Aa fee sue ‘unanunda oypucesunens o smupiogn se 2g uns sosunnnbs ay ‘Suneoo sopmog - TFTVI SSISOUd 50caQl-12 Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 The catty or po performance Process Table E: Spray SI — sy Lowe] veel omensde mane snare] on ny se eu] vel wowrpan nan ona oon] ae [a pace aes sore) ce ere enue nue [ea sony as a] en wz fone o vonpw29 mow euomboy unin weweveo mney |unusinonywnannn soxmbors Boome romeo ie wt seni remeigtinbes wo | oun ope ne no 28 Buoda appen amu we rnin nu "nmuesbes murs 0 Beaune men ie oop mg Gta Bnd UO Hoc a Ban needa“ esuRers MuCepe any in mune ‘inunino syed muons ona na epg vu sro Auids - SSTGVI SSIOOUd‘The catalyst fr peak performance AIAG Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 CcaQl-12 euervewenny} se rowel uyevosedo nan ogo ppiens Asoo ve hana hai oe sown! ae apo amon oa ea nay 9 hie 0 rerueycreuory] _pesopue feed va “ep peas te eee Bara ea mwa w wnrnesrssea) | wompuen wmoy ewmanbeywrann wonpucg emi framueinboyurunan svomuwoguonensesao ements, wm, | sn ‘uamunnbo} syd oer oF upc moja uo snsunanbas Aesds - THTEVI SSIOOUcal-12 Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 The catalyst for peak performance 33 mvs os inca eae ae ne pl reese m mene ut ‘coed ut v0 00K pur on 8 snap ner raat rn Pe a cared | ome | omen | aammapne, [emo acne renal aaa ma | a symuasebes seuoysns 0 Cunaones s of Buoyed voy 2} se puerban E00 Bu Avids - 7FTGVI SSIOOUCcaQl-12 Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 The catalyst lor pook performance smuenimusey] meet aseumumepricponennioun| 21 | sca emanW=Rcr| ewe pecyuou av pn put eneiain a] a prusunsoe] E aes purpecruc arcu) ecmensoog) IE | EER ymucing} Vues ont) yuonnine ne Sonne] va = oe wonpvg ny auaanbag unum wonpucgenoy |pusuainby unum] sumaeouonenes90 foumbarg Bavemon reog yma, sang econ aticone ye | wey ‘svonpuos erie Keno p20! Bujsodne pyc ou se sueuunbes nan | -symunmbat mucin o uguien #809 Anas 64 oHPre a Hone go a Bumuioued ue 2 sonal sei Bunt] Vousedsa "8's “seURIROSLjUOREPE eae Kul AuC%ENS Mu “sumumbas aye rena 0 eeupioqns 1 mop aN umaAnbes | Auids - THTEVI SSIOOWI 34cal-12 Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2. Issued: 02/2012 The catalyst for peak portommance Irrweressmucny] —ogeonideypmueunsoe purpenensiauul 8! | yy sy hse ove pu sus seven suewery sewouroce _ sms ne venga eg pus puctuou ee pun pu ened oe Jaane pue wosnpod over ea} Fereneieucry] —sevaine yes 1 gees vestne seuss] ad Tareonaae wy woonea| oF wmrvearstea | wonpueg iemey wowsynboy wns wonpues emoy |paweunboy wma smuwoguenen2s90 ouonborg uuoyuew, romeo 0 ad, dogg eeasoighioonen yo | 4 “usuaymba euoians oy Bunnys neo Aya eye Joypne oye of Ay BuRuoad UBu 2 s.UeNbaH oN Duysey UoNDedEU “Pe euMUAINbe:UOUEDE my fa ‘onpoo ene Aneto 51098 Suypoddns opyord You you oe uous uum] srmuasbesayoade mote 0 eyupiegns ae Hoag ueH® suRUEENS | Avids - 7 FVGWI SSIOOU 35The cata or peak performance setae lien wo worm) smdne mare niopseing oper nese om ‘opens sutuouran enpeuerod ng mom va serve cs averry| eo (wns vearseea) | wompuogjemoy uswoasbny unig wonpuegrerioy | uauaunbey une] ‘unwueowonenesao eventos Bavonsont stays eeoighidoneo ws | cum paar ‘suonipues ene Ato P2090 Bunioddne apd yu ou ve emwRIABs wna “sumeypbos sauerens 0 Buguoy09 s 2,02 fue us OVEN a yp ae 9 Bukuped Lay >)" meas BNE UoDAaN rvonpoe ney few swore a) “snuswaipba oyoads woren2 of uupiegns 21 moj2q ue swine I Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 CcaQl-12 Avids - THTAVI SSIOOUM 56caQl-12 Special Process: Coating System Assessment ‘Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 The catalyst for peak performance Sh Taaes sang ena slong] | wT renayaneacin| aso y esau ut a ve uated wate reruns] (ant pt eatncip ue yea ea ‘onword ae mayan) wemutsed may sin nn ave pr tune] as —_— scence voprons oom ro poe our pe mom oe ra ae pie vssepasio ven va tersennsery) costae ase nanog aun a oorena| e twmvvessstea) | voupveoieney ousinbey unui wonpuoa.eriay [yvunindoy un suimavegwovenag overs Bureyuen romeo, sang seooigiobueg yo | un typo re Aan oh poze Bude spor! ou ev smu NON ra siounipber eres of unuowoo sto fin HEU PE Yen ol us Bonuoped ut 39 semua mE Bune Looe rou owner ey hn mucins Aeids - TITAVI SSIOOUd—- Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 cQl-12 Process Table F: ElectrocoatcaQl-12 Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 The catalyst or peak performance mittee room nt sn es meng arnt [wesernbey umn Fours sivenven TBIGS De To SENSI BARTS SPROM Pad US THATS HUTT] ‘isons sons o Buopoo ss A Rus ype ae eo ag Buoyed uu > saDLANEe 8. ase LORD 8 “HuNLeNNAL CRE ney A CI» aA “eunoonbos sede wow oj upoane we noe vaud sueussnbes iy ywooonoorg - FITAVI SSIOOW oS)AIAG 2 The catalyst for paak parormance one Tee comune reruns va ‘1ati0] sao] cna ys an gm as 9 han renmnormuor| ers a crema comer egret ng ener] poormeu tay eve jane noe dung ae 049 0 ee] mruromuory poten panpors Sueg a uoiner ou rea wr trae} une owe 2) seadns ona wom ol eta wrote sna] on ‘emen vog sey uns oteun ou pi rea ssroyg tsa aio} rerum] parsons veg so sare nour op hsenpo> oy ve Taeoiide oan eal comiasseea) | vonpueateney mus onboyunany wonsuea enby [ewamboy wnunan paaao sxmanuecnonensgo ovebig Basossen vemog,6 0 seg sroigtotng veo | aun apne re TT otal Danene NOH PS CTA TOT) -nusinbe cans a Boone 09 Kas ye oHPne we go A BuLoUNd un “apuURbeY rN use Hole Be euuLanbel oop sey feu ¥uoIn> 24 "urue nbs 2uo%ds sun 0 aeuproans 2 nora nn ssoweirber ay] Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 caQl-12 weon0n90(3 - 7FTEVI SSIOOWcaQl-12 Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2. Issued: 02/2012 The catayst for peak performance Togei sees ono val ong] oo ny ssa ent te sng reveal ssa ‘anny ¢ hms on] roe esa are gi rewwaicir| ra oe vompu29 oy oweinooy wn vwoupueo emeyfusamanoey unin Tae ‘suena Bapesuon, ppaueo wa eg srosainban veo. | nus ‘wnusenbes nwoys of Bunuojs o> Kas ye oe Heme ga ey Bond um 2 euENboy owe "buna voDadeL “seu uORpDE ane Kew LCA wooosi20r3 - TFTVI SSIOOWS 61The catalyst or peak performace amg] evn we | ew uote rerun voy mal We | no ast} uve mason yop 004 8 nome no anc oon ebm se) al nou gunn mrumiznusry maton un ute oat nn S19 souens mpemnion em n oePen mina trum grup expaonéen sve tatean ne 0 aw Sermcscmetel ce | no et aun Baers portman sea dy mn Bae a twmineaieoa— | voupwoo enoy a mony una venpog enoy veuserony umn ‘nunaweononaman orb Boon pmeoie sats sen eosahobe me ese ean suonpues ene aslo spleens pron pa ous Rusu! uaa Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 CcaQl-12 Process Table G: Dip/Spincal-12 ‘Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 ‘The catays fr peak performance hon sous pur wpa ve “wowsrea Sau poy ng ys > uN ‘suotuo] exmuapans ortonai| sor re sarpenor vowny tt] eto] even ‘aouss pas op ne des es poo peeved gue vens mere bu re] atu] ven] _eysinejenuays nd pees nave pin 29 aor ea ea Besson ru oe sxsuemba err] a] rrr eau apse ogra dvr Bee ve “sve ones temo] baotio| Irvenl yo gaede poms susan ma sos i oes ory neuer] real pauigued ov om os Bao eo ed neu or reo perme 8 Ane ed Base v0 ‘wea Bane) we wmireareeee) | voupuooreny samy aru vonpuea eri |ysunandny wnunn ToT ssusuwepuodetnsa9 fouonoon Bisenwon revo 02h, sng sre>eiahobae9 vs | eum ‘ususnms moans Biases a mess Aus eye oypne 9 Re ol aNMONe uo "9 sBEUEnbDY 8a. Bue Lond “82 ou urds)diq- SSTaVI SSIOOwd 63The catast for peak performance AIAG 2a ‘ase 4 sr} revenl —— peecyermuetepaamnonsiomouma| se | %2 sou od ol i we tubo] eral ‘en woe ye poop oa ae e120 capo on una sz0 epson 20 so ers (on org cee 20) ei tyson) 112 | 0120 (nase) wonpuea eney |rsusynb=y unum snmuueguenersene ypnven 09h sng stent) vs | #umy pati spc erie geno pose Gaps pron Tuo oe svbumabo what “sumer wos 0 Buojo> mec jum ue OER pa mg Bap m2) sven Ae Bs wonDede Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 caQl-12 udsidig - SSTGVE SSIOOWScaQl-12 Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2 Issued: 02/2012 The catalyst for peak performance Testes Ts e ein is 2 a mine [aes = jena mew caren rate] oz | Fo in scmminnmnests| gt | vm 1 ogi une) weshs esi ones! 7 = val ca - eer om Si ma comma] wine ee rome w= vaiiasioas, | somone, | eapteremen” | eteemomie [amine 8 =——— ‘ees ome mo mat easements Ee ety "npn ene Aan oy pon umoddns opnan ou you bs imunnbe ran j -nuswaynbarouoyer 0 Buauoje> santo Mun jays EERE Ne gol BinUped Lye saDuEnbny mtei8 tune wojdeuy “2 ‘suumumanbe, Logpe oy few uC 2} -tuswoynbes syoeds mucsna ck seupiogns ae nopq LAN eususznba! iy] unds/dia - SHGVI SSIOOWd 65The catalyst for peak perormance seven una nent pr Ba i eurnanvany) Pra ee pase 8 mre sncipinas mmnecnescrn ong tutes nahn nay Soe on eu pnd we pons era mec execs utp a pus mon abana enon arenes ates va ona sno tie rursamuory a von ara taney o wooo ere nanny wn ‘onpong mney [rmnndoy nanan eseumoanonmng omnbnaBuiewon remeoie ata senate vo | su TTeFOOS TN AT OO aponUR PROM Ra Oo HOTA] yore of manana iy a moved es 80 Uo snubs ecippe ay feu meen symone ayoude nan 0 pio wt oj wan susunba Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 Process Table H: Autodeposition caQl-12 uonisodepoiny - STEVI SSIOOWdcal-12 Version 2. Issued: 02/2012 Toma moana woaiong] @ Special Process: Coating System Assessment ‘ane ine sg prumoimuary| fouanbas onion, vemog aah sag ations =, |e sumunoie erie 6 Bunojo yao Aaa He oyENE mH Yone gw SuReje UIA sHovENb Je sa woods “Be Ue LOM DNB The catalyst fr peak performance AIAG. uonisodopoiny - HS TEVI SSIOOUd 67The catalyst or peak perormance Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 caQl-12 Process Table I: Cure a ‘susan ins Boiqo3 somes ne wut ye ane el Bue URW spuaboy at Be Loja ume! ICRA MANA ue ma 68cQli-12 ‘Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 The catalyst for peok performance Process Table J: Anodizing and Hard Coat Anodizing lerven io saeuory| vor ynease ors a ous] | ppenruaire| eeuarn] uti ssany nonaues) wont] nun ones wee 6 ee} ope 05 Hep ws] even eneguicg meno] zn “eo fama er aewor| nanan oe sanins a tasoc onnn| Trav eae Bane] wnseas sta) wong em wompa09 amaanntny arson oenberg Buen ewe oh, ‘sag racaig titan oom -eveusyns won 0 Biuoio soo veh He CHPNE RA HE ef EA URN 8 eNom ‘a DW pons hu oven fm fag no Surzpouy ie09 pieH pur Surrpouy FFTGV SSIOON 69The catayst for peak pertormance Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 0272012 cal-12 ‘ara aye Ko ‘sso0t Pawo sum 2 scr cual ‘tueys saan va pur vorenea ease oud see rue ‘0a eel sinvein| (omnes » sewed Le a ‘ou vos, 04 0 vom nex hs su0] rerveru>isuer| ‘xu Asc) aan 980 28 20} IRruen eaBoeg ye enue ssacoKd 3 mn 26 a0} sens even] sara gon aug] servo 0 aeeuorn| sunexig Ke sug] eur sence hare suo] rue sun dave 10| women eoy woussnbey unum wompuea emoy fuswennboy wnuqon| FOIE ovanbarg xoyu0H, onuo9 oa, sag ssoo1ghotor.9 veo | sunn Surzpouy ye00 pueH pue Bumpouy "STEVI SION 70cal-12 Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 The catalyst for peak performance sp 1 230) verse sue youonoe u sugeg or ssnoy 19 210) rerven 2 neuoin| asa uorres| oor ssnoy 219 2240) saewer| ue soe uopnves) oneoy| sor souevoueu feu 0 stu weir yon seosol prewerne rerven 2 newoor| oul ver sasct are pue ums yo Seat UH 7 + fp 2 20] serum (ote = pov on ey YO) one BOY] cer ep 8 suo] uma vomamussve| zor se es reer verues 0 ower ver aos ta tases srensieo| reais soumanveu soneuenid a una eer sep 20 300] rue uer oq puog erioy swennbey wn vompuag fersay —fumuarnboy wnat FOOTE sumuueqyvonewesco *2uonderg avon von roau09 7 dA, sda ss0.0 gt0B0460 so | #um “iuowaunbas ouoyans 6) Bujasoy0o | 2809 Kueh eu JoNpne an phe ao ak BLINN LaNy “9 e}oUenbOH OH “us YoNDedE “Be INU ‘sivewaiba oyoods raworeno oy reupvogns ave moje vans siuawennbes ty] Burzpouy 109 pieH pur Burzipouy TFTEVI SSIOOwd ncal-12 AIAG Special Process: Coating System Assessment Version 2, Issued: 02/2012 The catalyst for peak porformance ap mt oo] serve wero wong seg ow sano g Ha 200] ervey 2 seucry| 21m wero ow sara Hans 25] aevers| (um soioy nag) one un | ‘uana mye ian eran porcine ruey 2 xeu0r| owl i ep 04 og] anna on oon 24 90] serve re +449 98 200] rata) ere hep 4 210] verse von seco] er ioe (rouen 0 sewon] penn ve ogame fa Buponeu med err) oF wmsvesrsseg — | vonpuogrmoy wowornboy wun wowpuen enay frueuosndey wns FOOTE swuewueivonen9s90 oven oH remveo 0 ods, ‘ag seasoigboboneg ws | eum ‘eanpar eu uanbas syawavnbasuoyan 0 Bunuioyio n aRo> fyuasyeys one ap ype Ao BuRUOVed UO “8 s_suBNbay a8 Bape LoNDEdBU “B “ewasnbos ayoeds ouoyero 0: aeupiogne ae Wojea va swowninbss yy Surrpouy yeop puey pue Surzpouy -FTEVI SSIOOWd