BATANGAS STATE UNIVERSITY

College of Accountancy, Business, Economics and

International Hospitality Management
Batangas City

Graduate School

ADVANCE STATISTICS (PA502)

STATISTICS CASE ANALYSIS NO. 1
WORST NATIONAL BANK

ROGELIO ANTENOR
PROFESSOR

GRACE ANN C. CASUNDO

STUDENT

MASTER IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

OCTOBER 16, 202

 WORST NATIONAL BANK
Statistics Case Analysis No. 1

Problem:
The Human Resources Manager, Mr. Gerry Fuller tasks to undertake a comprehensive salary
equity review. Upon undergoing the investigation, a group of female employees complained
about the preferential salary treatment given to male employees while other bank officials
grab the opportunity to examine a wide range of other salary-related issues.

Objectives:
1. To determine if male employees of Worst National Bank were given preferential salary
treatment.
2. To summarize the available information for further analysis, including but not limited to
addressing the discrimination question.

Summary of Available Information

1. Annual Salary in Thousands of dollars

Average Salary in thousands of dollars

Minimu Maximu Std.

N m m Mean Deviation
Annual Salary 221 26.70 97.00 40.0810 11.22575
Valid N (listwise) 221
Figure 1.1 Shows the average salary in thousands of dollars of (N)221
employees is (M) 40.08 with the standard deviation of 11.23 and variance of
126.02.

Table 1.2 Skewness and Kurtosis

N Skewness Kurtosis
Std.
Statistic Statistic Error Statistic Std. Error
Annual Salary 221 2.415 .164 8.284 .326
Valid N 221
(listwise)
Figure 1.2 Shows that the skewness and kurtosis for annual salary are both
positive indicating that the data are skewed to the right. Standard error of .164
for skewness and .326 for kurtosis.
 Table 1.3 Annual Salary-Mean, Median and Mode

N Valid 221
Missing 0
Mean 40.0810
Median 37.2500
Mode 34.00
Std. Deviation 11.22575
Variance 126.017
Figure 1.3 Shows the median with annual salary of $ 37.25 and mode or most number of
respondents with annual salary of $34.00.

Figure 1.1
HISTOGRAM

Figure 1.4 The illustration of the annual salary which is evidently described skewed to the
right.
 2. Age in years

Table 2.1 Average Age in years

Minimu Maximu Std.

N m m Mean Deviation Variance
Age in years 221 22 65 40.54 10.357 107.277
Valid N 221
(listwise)

Table 2.1 The table confirms the average age in years of (N)221 employees is (M)
40.54 with the standard deviation of 10.357 and variance of 107.277.

Table 2.2 Skewness and Kurtosis

N Mean Skewness Kurtosis

Statistic Statistic Statistic Std. Error Statistic Std. Error
Age in years 221 40.54 .511 .164 -.634 .326
Valid N 221
(listwise)

Table 2.2 Displays the skewness for age is positive and skewed to the right. While
kurtosis for age indicating that the data is skewed to the left with standard error of .
164 for skewness and -.634 for kurtosis.

Table 2.3 Age in years-Mean, Median and Mode

N Valid 221
Missing 0
Mean 40.54
Median 38.00
Mode 37
Table 1.3 Shows the median with the age of 38 and mode or most number of
respondents with the age of 37.