Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

READERS' FORUM

Letters to the editor*


Orthodontics and the repair of gingival 7. When the aim of the study was “to quantify the
changes of gingival recessions following ortho-
recessions dontic displacement of exposed roots toward
the center of the alveolar bony envelope,” it
W e congratulate the authors for their notable work
in the area of orthodontic force application,
gingival recession, and its repair, which is one of the un-
might have been better to mention the changes
in measurement scale. Furthermore, comparative
statistics could have provided better insight, if
touched aspects of the interdisciplinary approach.1 The
applied.
research question of the study was clear in producing a
8. To classify the Class III and Class IV categories,
better clinical impact. The following are concerns that,
there were no diagnostic aids used or
if clarified, might improve the clinical approach and
radiographs mentioned. Before the beginning of
outcome:
the treatment and even after improvement,
1. What was the etiology of the gingival recession? changes in the interdental bone were
Displacement of the tooth alone does not produce not evaluated properly. Without such evaluation,
the recession of gingiva and soft tissue defect. The justifying the improvement from Class IV
displacement might produce dehiscence and/or category to Class I would be improper and
fenestration, which are true bony defects, but not unsatisfactory.
all the patients present with soft tissue defect such 9. According to Miller's3 classification for gingival
as gingival recession. Although, with dehiscence recession, Class IV describes “Marginal tissue
and fenestration, the chances of gingival recession recession extends to or beyond the mucogingival
are consistently higher.2 junction, with severe bone and soft tissue loss in
2. All the subjects were in the age range of 22-41 years the interdental area and or severe malposition of
(mean age, 28 years). If mere displacement was the teeth.” Thus, with only labiolingual root
reason for the gingival recession, why were adoles- movement of only 1 incisor, it is quite
cents not included in the study? confusing to understand how it is possible that
3. Was there any history of previous orthodontic treat- the interdental bone, which is apical to the
ment or recent oral intervention for improvement of soft tissue level, improved to Class I, which is
gingival health because all the patients had excel- just a soft tissue recession, without any
lent oral hygiene and good occlusion? interdental bone loss. Moreover, no radiographs
4. According to the Material and Methods section, have been included by the authors to support
“Apart from the gingival recession of the displaced such changes.
incisor, none of the patients exhibited periodontal
Venkatachalapathy Anusuya
inflammation, radiological signs, or clinically
Jitendra Sharan
detectable defects, which would indicate a past his- Ashok Kumar Jena
tory of periodontitis.” Is that “none of the other
Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
teeth” or “none of the patients?”
5. Furthermore, in the Results section, the authors Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2020;158:4
mentioned the Class III and Class IV gingival reces- 0889-5406/$36.00
Ó 2020 by the American Association of Orthodontists. All rights reserved.
sions and their improvement to either Class II or https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.03.011
Class I after torquing. According to Miller,3 Class
III and IV gingival recessions do have interdental
bone loss, which is in contrast to the author's obser- REFERENCES
vation.3
1. Laursen MG, Rylev M, Melsen B. The role of orthodontics in the
6. As a clinical trial that was conducted on humans, repair of gingival recessions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
ethical clearance was not mentioned. 2020;157:29-34.
2. Jati AS, Furquim LZ, Consolaro A. Gingival recession: its causes and
types, and the importance of orthodontic treatment. Dental Press J
Orthod 2016;21:18-29.
* The viewpoints expressed are solely those of the author(s) and do not reflect 3. Miller PD Jr. A classification of marginal tissue recession. Int J Peri-
those of the editor(s), publisher(s), or Association. odontics Restorative Dent 1985;5:8-13.

You might also like