Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 12

Railways

Mechanical Stabilisation of
Track Ballast and Sub-ballast
2

Tensar Technology -
proven practical solutions and the
know-how to get them built
Based on the characteristic properties of Tensar geogrids,
Tensar Technology is widely adopted for stabilisation of the
ballast and sub-ballast layers, delivering real savings in time,
construction and maintenance costs. We can help you apply
Tensar Technology to improve the bottom line on your project.

Considerable experience has been gained on


high speed lines to reduce settlement and
control differential settlement, (Netherlands)

2 major application areas for the use of Tensar biaxial


Reducing ballast deformation through the
1 mechanical stabilisation of the ballast layer
Poor track geometry and a loss of
Tensar geogrid
vertical and horizontal alignment of
the rails is a major reason for line
speed restrictions and track Ballast

maintenance work. These can


significantly affect schedules and are
expensive and disruptive to the
public and the train operators.
Subgrade
Track maintenance, involving ballast
tamping or full ballast replacement, ■ Mechanical stabilisation of the ballast layer to reduce the rate of
arises not only on weak subgrades track settlement and hence increase the period between
but also on firmer supporting soils. maintenance operations with huge whole life benefits.
Mechanical stabilisation of ballast,
using Tensar geogrids, gives the
railway engineer a rapid and safe RESEARCH HAS DEMONSTRATED
THAT TENSAR GEOGRIDS CAN:
solution.
■ Reduce the rate of ballast settlement
Tensar geogrids have been used to ■ Maintain track geometry for longer
stabilise track ballast since the early ■ Extend the maintenance cycle by a factor of about 3
1980s to decrease maintenance
■ Function in ballast for more than 20 years
costs and maintain ride quality.
■ Reduce traffic-induced ballast degradation
geogrids within the track substructure
Improving track foundation through the
2 mechanical stabilisation of the sub-ballast layer
When constructing track over soft
subgrade having a low bearing
Ballast Tensar geogrid
capacity, it is necessary to improve
the foundation to support the
ballast effectively. This can involve a
time consuming chemical
stabilisation of the subgrade or deep
excavation followed by importation Soft subgrade
and placement of a thick and
Granular sub-ballast
expensive granular sub-ballast layer.

■ Mechanical stabilisation of the granular sub-ballast layer to


Introducing Tensar geogrid
increase the bearing capacity over soft subgrade, with significant
reinforcement allows for a
thickness reductions and savings in both the capital and
significant reduction of sub-ballast
environmental costs.
layer thickness for the same bearing
capacity.

This results in reduction of subgrade Tensar has extensive experience in


excavation and spoil disposal and mechanically stabilising sub-ballast
much less imported sub-ballast fill, layers, especially in the upgrading of
while still achieving the target European railway corridors, that has
stiffness value required for the resulted in many successful cost- 3
support of the ballast. effective installations.
How Tensar stabilisation geogrids work
Tensar geogrids make a structural contribution to railway
trackbed. When granular fill material, such as ballast or
sub-ballast, is compacted over a Tensar geogrid, it
4 partially penetrates and projects through the apertures to
create a strong and positive interlock. This interlock
enables the geogrid to resist horizontal shear from the fill
and restrains the granular material from lateral spread,
which is a major cause of settlement of railway track.
This mechanism is critical in helping to maintain the
horizontal and vertical alignments of the rails.

Tensar stabiliation geogrids are produced with high


tensile stiffness which allows load to be developed at
very low strain. These polypropylene geogrids are
manufactured with dimensionally stable apertures.
Matching the appropriate geogrid aperture size with the
particle sizes of the overlying fill material is important to
the stabilisation performance. The essential features of
Tensar
Tensar geogrids, which are required to ensure effective geogrid
interlock, include the strength of the junctions and the
shape and stiffness of the ribs. The Tensar manufacturing
The interlock between the geogrid and the granular fill limits lateral
process produces a monolithic geogrid structure with movement of particles even when dynamic loading is applied. In practice
high junction strength and with ribs which present a this means that the settlement rate is reduced.

square and thick leading edge to the aggregate for


effective transfer of load.

applied force

tensile restraint

The characteristic cross-sectional shape of Tensar ribs provides bearing The ribs present a thick, square, leading edge to create positive transfer of
points for fill particles, unlike other geogrid grid types with more rounded load from the ballast to the geogrid.
profiles. The forces can then be transferred through the junctions and
throughout the geogrid framework.

Tensar geocomposites
For details of Tensar workshops visit www.tensar-international.com

Tensar geogrids are also available in a composite


form where a non-woven geotextile is bonded to
the geogrid. The composite products are
particularly suitable when the functions of
separation and filtration are needed together with
reinforcement.

A composite version is available incorporating a geotextile separator.


Mechanical installation of geogrid
within the ballast by a ballast
Mechanical stabilisation of ballast cleaning machine (India).

1 to reduce maintenance costs


Early laboratory tests, Canada 1986
In 1986, full scale model laboratory tests were carried the sleeper could sustain over 4 times the number of
out to investigate the effect of Tensar geogrids in load cycles, across the practicable range of settlements.
stabilising railway ballast and controlling the settlement This indicated that there were great advantages to using
of the sleeper. On both a weak and a firm subgrade, the geogrid stabilisation for all railway track in reducing
geogrid reduced the rate of sleeper settlement such that settlement and reducing maintenance.

Number of cycles
1 10 100 1,000 10,000 100,000 1,000,000 10,000,000
0
Permanent sleeper settlement (mm)

10

20
4.9x 4.75x
25mm

30
Infinite CBR (control) Infinite CBR (reinforced)
CBR 39% (control) CBR 39% (reinforced) 5
CBR 1% (control) CBR 1% (reinforced)
40
Research in Canada showed that by including Tensar geogrid over relatively weak and firm foundation soils maintenance life
increased by a factor of 4.9 and 4.75 respectively (after Bathurst, 1986*).
6

Research by British Rail demonstrated the maintenance benefit of Tensar geogrids.

Research by British Rail, UK 1994


In the early 1990s British Rail Research investigated the This work showed that the introduction of geogrid
use of a Tensar geogrid to limit the progressive lateral reinforcement into the ballast over a soft subgrade can
displacement of the ballast particles under repeated train provide a performance almost equal to a railway track
loading. This investigated the settlement and the rate of placed on a firm foundation.
deterioration of the vertical track geometry.
Tensar geogrids were also shown to reduce the elastic
The full scale trial using a 40 tonne rolling load rig to deflection by up to 40%. This benefit can be of
simulate 2 million gross tonnes on the track, consisted of considerable value in reducing maintenance costs and
three tests over a soft subgrade (E=10MPa). In two of disruptive delays in replacing damaged track components
the tests, the geogrid was laid in the underlying ballast such as insulated block joints (IBJs) which are vulnerable
layer. The results of these tests were then compared with to damage caused by rail deformation.
a similar unreinforced test previously carried out over a
very firm subgrade.

Initial lift (mm)


0 10 20 30 40 50
For details of Tensar workshops visit www.tensar-international.com

0
Settlement after traffic of 2M tonnes (mm)

Firm subgrade
Soft foundation
10
with Tensar geogrid
reinforcement
Improvement
20 from Tensar
reinforcement

30

Soft foundation
without Tensar
Initial lift to reinforcement
40 Settlement (mm)
operational
level (mm) Test 1: soft sub-structure
and no geogrid
Test 2: soft sub-structure
& geogrid 50mm above
Rail track level Rail track level Position after (2M
before raised during gross tonnes) Test 3: soft sub-structure &
reinstatement re-ballasting trafficking geogrid 100mm above

Installation of Tensar geogrids into the ballast over soft subgrade significantly reduces settlement, making it
comparable with track on firm foundations (after Matharu, 1994*).
Research at The University of Nottingham, UK 2006
A major UK research and development project led by the Initial work on a small element of railway track tested a
University of Nottingham quantified the permanent variety of geogrids to examine the influence on
settlement of track and investigated the use of Tensar settlement of grid stiffness, aperture size and geogrid rib
geogrids to control the settlement of track ballast and profile. The results identified the optimum rib pitch for
increase the periods between maintenance. The three- interlock with standard ballast stone grading. The
year project concluded in 2006 and was part funded by a performance was found to be relatively insensitive to the
€350,000 innovation award grant from the Royal Society. geogrid depth within the ballast.

The project involved experimental work and theoretical


modelling together with a major field trial and the RESULTS DEMONSTRATED THAT THE
development of design guidance. The research was FOLLOWING GEOGRID PROPERTIES ARE ALSO
IMPORTANT:
conducted at the University with three commercial
partners; Tensar International, leading railway consultant ■ Strong junction strength (>95% efficiency)
Scott Wilson Pavement Engineering Ltd and leading ■ High tensile stiffness at low strain levels
railway contractor Carillion Rail. Network Rail (who own ■ Rib thickness
and operate Britain’s rail infrastructure) was represented
■ Square edged rib profile
on the project Steering Group.

Tensar geogrid reduces maintenance


The Nottingham Rail Test Facility (RTF) allows a full-
scale section of rail track, three sleepers in length, to
be tested. Dynamic loading is provided by three
hydraulic actuators to simulate the passing of a rolling
stock axle. Three separate installations, one control
and two geogrid reinforced, were tested to a million
cycles. In one reinforced installation the geogrid was
placed at the base of the ballast and in the other the
geogrid was raised slightly above the base.

Settlement was measured and the results confirmed


the findings from smaller scale composite element
tests (CET). The results showed that use of Tensar large
aperture geogrid could increase the intervals between
maintenance interventions by a factor of at least 2.5. Simulated train loading at The Nottingham University RTF.

Number of cycles
0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000
0

2
Unreinforced Control
Reinforced with Tensar geogrid
4
Settlement (mm)

6
Over 2.5x

10

12

14
Results from the Nottingham University Railway Test Facility (RTF) show that Tensar geogrids provide
approximately 2.5 times increase in number of axle passes for same settlement (after Brown et al, 2006*).
7
Monitored Field Demonstrations, Network Rail, UK
A demonstration project organised by Network Rail on Network Rail has found that the performance of the
the busy West Coast Main Line (WCML) between London Tensar stabilised sections show a significant
and Scotland has confirmed the findings from the improvement. Analysis of the data indicates that Tensar is
8 Nottingham laboratory research. An 800m section of extending the maintenance life compared with the
track at Coppull Moor had a history of poor geometry conventional solution by between 2 and 4 times.
and high maintenance. Network Rail decided to
reconstruct this length of track with new ballast and
sleepers. The demonstration was split into four sections; The detailed record from the HSTRC monitoring (shown
two control sections and two with Tensar geogrid ballast below) demonstrates dramatically how, for more than 10
reinforcement. years, this section of track had required almost
continuous speed restrictions despite maintenance
Network Rail has regularly monitored standard deviation typically twice a year. However after the renewal in late
(SD) of the vertical deformation of the track using their 2004, using geogrid to stabilise the ballast, both the
high speed track recording coach (HSTRC). There was reduction in the magnitude of SD as well as the rate of
much historical data with which to compare the deterioration are likely to result in at least three years
performance of the reinforced and non-reinforced with neither maintenance nor speed restriction.
sections of the latest renewal.

Year
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
0
With Tensar
geogrid
stabilisation
1
No reinforcement

2
SD over 35m (mm)

3
Limit for
imposing
speed
4 restrictions

Track rehabilitation
Tensar ballast
reinforcement
5 introduced here

WCML trial showing reduced rate of track quality deterioration


following geogrid installation (after Sharpe et al, 2006*).

Network Rail’s approach to mechanical stabilisation of


For details of Tensar workshops visit www.tensar-international.com

ballast in the UK
Based on the above evidence, Network Rail is extensively track on geogrid stabilised ballast compared with
using Tensar geogrid to extend the maintenance life for conventional unstabilised ballast. In effect, the presence
track renewals over problem formations. Tensar of the geogrid allows thickness reductions to the
geogrids are also being used at transition trackbed depth under the sleeper.
zones between widely different support
stiffness formations, to mitigate the effect Tensar geogrids have been granted Network Rail
of differential settlement. This can occur for Product Acceptance Certification (Number
example at the run-on and run-off at under PA05/02516) for the
bridges. Structural Reinforcement
of Ballasted Trackbed.
Network Rail’s current Code of Practice on
Formation Treatments, R/SP/TRK/9039,
acknowledges the structural contribution from an Network Rail has granted
approved geogrid. This code, coupled with a Tensar geogrids full product
acceptance in accordance
product acceptance certificate allows significantly with The Code of Practice.
lower dynamic sleeper support stiffness values for
Durability in Ballast

Tensar geogrids have been used to stabilise ballast for This is evidence that in the harsh environment of railway
almost 30 years and some monitoring of their condition, ballast, Tensar has proved that the service life will extend
in the field, has been possible. well beyond twenty years.

At a site known as Shirland in the UK, the geogrid was For the project itself, it is a problem solved. Before the
installed in 1988 and in collaboration with the track maintenance work, the line needed maintenance several
operator Network Rail, geogrid samples were retrieved in times per year. The records show that maintenance has
1997 and 2006. Since installation the railway had been been reduced to a fraction of the former level. The cost
trafficked by some 200 million gross tons of both freight benefit to railway operators speaks for itself.
and passenger trains. An assessment of abrasion was
made by examining the tensile strength properties of a
geogrid that was placed approximately 225mm below Quality control limit
sleeper bottom. The diagram shows that the tensile
strength properties have been maintained and the
geogrid remains stronger and stiffer than the quality
QC strength (kN/m)

control standard for the Tensar geogrid that was supplied


to the project. Abrasion effects are negligible.

1988 After 9 yrs After 18 yrs

After 18 years, Tensar keeps its quality control strength.

Geogrid SS1 sub-ballast stabilisation


Tensile strength tests (single rib)
16
SS1 LD characteristic
14
SS1 LD test results
12

10
Strength kN/m

4
Tensile testing of retrieved
samples compared with the
9
2
original quality strength and
strain (red).
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
% Strain
10

2 Mechanical stabilisation of sub-ballast


to reduce construction costs

Tensar TriAxTM geogrids installed under the granular sub-ballast layer to increase bearing capacity (Belgium).

Almost 30 years experience in 120


mechanically stabilising granular fill Unreinforced
100 Reinforced with
Tensar International has developed the mechanical Tensar biaxial
stabilisation of both sub-base and railway sub-ballast. 80
EV2 modulus (MPa)

A proven performance has been demonstrated in


numerous trials, demonstrations and research projects.
60

The resulting sub-ballast layer will provide significant


40
savings in construction costs.
20
The thickness and structural performance of sub-ballast,
over weak subgrades, also ensures that the ballast layer
0
has a sustained quality of support and maintenance 400mm 600mm
needs can reduce significantly.
For details of Tensar workshops visit www.tensar-international.com

Sub-ballast thickness (mm)

(after Seiler, 1995*).


Demonstration projects in Europe
The German Rail Authorities Deutsche Bahn (DB)
PLATE BEARING TESTS ON TOP OF THE
carried out a monitored trial during the widening of
the Berlin-Munich line between Hochstadt and SUB-BALLAST SHOWED:-
Probstzella where the subgrade was very soft, with a ■ Tensar geogrid reinforcement doubled the
modulus Eu of 7-15 MPa. modulus of a sub-ballast layer.
■ Tensar allowed a 33% reduction in sub-ballast
Trial sections of 400mm and 600mm sub-ballast thickness, ie the modulus of a 400mm layer
thickness were constructed. Half of each section with Tensar was equivalent to a 600mm
included Tensar geogrid reinforcement. unreinforced thickness.

No other geogrid was able to demonstrate these


values to qualify for inclusion in the project.
1200
On a monitored project in Cologne in 2003, the
inclusion of a Tensar geocomposite over a soft
1000
formation permitted a reduction in sub-ballast
Unstabilised
thickness from 1050mm to 700mm, while
maintaining the target modulus of 120MPa as the 800

Thickness h (mm)
ballast support value.
600

400

200
Stabilised
Unreinforced and
reinforced designs 0
0 10 20 30 40 50
Subgrade modulus (Eu)
ballast E = 120 MPa
Comparison of unreinforced and reinforced sub-ballast
layers providing the same ballast support value (Eu)

700mm sub-ballast
1050mm sub-ballast

Subgrade, Eu = 10 MPa

target
modulus
sleeper 80 MPa under side of sleeper

On the Bratislava to Trnava line in ballast 50 MPa top of msl


Slovakia, the client used a Tensar
mechanically stabilised layer to mechanically stabilised layer

achieve the UIC standard


minimum support modulus of
50MPa on top of the sub-ballast.
Plate loading tests were subgrade
The Tensar design was for a
conducted on site to examine the mechanically stabilised layer
(msl) of the thickness and fill
validity of the design. The specification to achieve the
following results were obtained: target

100

90 Modulus on subgrade
Modulus on top of Tensar
stabilised sub-ballast
80

70
EV2 modulus (MPa)

60 50 MPa
target

50

40

30

20
Tensar soil reinforcement have
Network Rail Product Acceptance
10 Certification (Number PA05/175 &
177) for railway embankments, 11
slope repairs and reinforced soil
0
applications.
1 5 9
Test location *All technical references can be
The Tensar solution achieved and exceeded the target obtained from Tensar.
Contact Tensar International or your local distributor to receive further
literature covering Tensar products and applications.
Also available on request are case studies, installation guides and
specification notes.
The complete range of Tensar literature consists of:
• Tensar Geosynthetics in Civil Engineering A guide to the products
and their applications
• Ground Stabilisation Reinforcing unbound layers
in roads and trafficked areas
• TriAxTM - A Revolution in Geogrid Technology
The properties and performance advantages of the Tensar TriAxTM geogrids
• Tensartech Earth Retaining Systems
• Foundations over Piles Constructing over weak ground
without settlement
• Basal Reinforcement Constructing embankments over weak ground
• Railways Mechanical stabilisation of track ballast and sub-ballast
• Asphalt Pavements Reinforcing asphalt layers in roads and
trafficked areas
• Erosion Controlling erosion on soil and rock slopes

Your local distributor is:

Tensar International Limited – Malaysia Regional Office


No 22A-3, Jalan PJU 5/16
Dataran Sunway, Kota Damansara
Petaling Jaya
47810 Selangor
Malaysia
Tel: + 60 3 6157 3276
Fax: + 60 3 6157 3239
Email: enquiry@tensar.com.my

Tensar International Limited Tel: +44 (0)1254 262431


Cunningham Court, Fax: +44 (0)1254 266868
Shadsworth Business Park E-mail: info@tensar.co.uk
Blackburn BB1 2QX www.tensar-international.com
United Kingdom

Q 05288 EMS 86463


ISO 9001:2008 ISO 14001:2004

©Copyright Tensar International Limited


Printed March 2010 Issue 10

The information in this brochure is supplied by Tensar International free of charge. Tensar
International do not assume any duty of care to you or any third party. No liability for negligence
(other than for death and personal injury) can arise from any use of or reliance on the information
in this brochure or use of any Tensar International product mentioned. Tensar International will
not be liable if this brochure contains any misrepresentation or misstatement. Determination of
the suitability for any project of the information and any Tensar International product mentioned in
it must be made by your engineer or other professional advisor who has full knowledge of the
project. You, together with any such engineer or advisor, must assume all risk of loss and damage
of any kind arising from use of the information or any product of Tensar International other than
the risk of death and personal injury. If you or any third party subsequently purchases a product
referred to in this brochure or any other Tensar International product the entire terms of the
contract of purchase and the entire obligation of Tensar International relating to the product or
arising from its use shall be as set out in Tensar International's Standard Conditions in force at the
time of purchase, a copy of which may be requested from Tensar International.

You might also like