Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The "Jocaxian Nothingness" F.A.Q. Frequently Asked Questions About The Jocaxian Nothingness "JN" Jocax, Feb/2009 Translated by Debora Policastro
The "Jocaxian Nothingness" F.A.Q. Frequently Asked Questions About The Jocaxian Nothingness "JN" Jocax, Feb/2009 Translated by Debora Policastro
A: The JN, differently from existent things, presents the following properties:
P1- There are no physical elements of any kind (matter, space or energy).
P2- There are no laws of any kind.
3- Is the JN a being?
A: Yes. Once it has properties, it should exist in order to be a recipient of such
properties.
6- The Jocaxian Nothingness does not have physical elements or laws. Does it have
any POTENTIAL?
A: If “potential” means the possibility of transforming itself, the answer is yes.
However, we must bear in mind that possibility is not certainty.
The Jocaxian Nothingness could eventually never become or generate something else.
7- Would the Trivial Nothingness, where nothing can happen, be more likely than the
“JN”?
A: No! The nothingness people usually think of, which I called “the trivial nothingness”
(TN) is infinitely more unlikely to happen as the origin of the universe than the
JN. The “trivial nothingness” would have INFINITE embedded rules that
must be followed, i.e. it could not generate fields, space, it could not generate a chair;
it could not generate physical laws, god, a Big-Bang, life, particles, etc.
8 – Is the “Inexistent Nothingness” purer than the JN?
A: The Inexistent Nothingness is a “nothingness” where nothing exists, not even itself!
Therefore, it is intrinsically contradictory. Since it does not exist, it could not have
properties, but once it has the “not having anything” property, it should exist. Thus, if
the “IN” exists, it cannot be inexistent, and if it is inexistent, it cannot exist. It is a
contradiction, and that is why it was not used as the generator of the cosmos.
A: Hardly. Since our cosmos is flooded with physical laws, in order to create a JN it
would be necessary to withdraw all the physical laws from that portion. No one
knows yet if it is possible or how it could be done.
14- Is it necessary to sort laws temporally in order to have a natural selection of laws?
That is, would time be a prerequisite?
A: It would not be a big problem in case we needed some “time law” or “time” itself to
sort laws materialized by the JN. It would be enough only to “wait” that one of
the schizo-creations was a temporal law. Thereafter new laws would be sorted
and undergo the “natural selection”.
15- What is the evidence that our cosmos came from a JN?
A: The evidence would be a logical universe where there are no physical contradictions
between its physical elements.