Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Biology of Igg Subclasses and Their Clinical Relevance To Transplantation
The Biology of Igg Subclasses and Their Clinical Relevance To Transplantation
The Biology of Igg Subclasses and Their Clinical Relevance To Transplantation
Abstract: Immunoglobulin G (IgG) is the dominant immunoglobulin and can be divided into 4 distinct subclasses. The evolution
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/transplantjournal by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hCywCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC1y0abggQZXdgGj2MwlZLeI= on 09/03/2021
of IgG subclass switches is regulated by interaction with T cells and follows a 1-way direction (IgG3 → IgG1 → IgG2 → IgG4).
Based on their structure, the 4 IgG subclasses can initiate different effector function such as complement activation, recruitment
of various cells by Fc receptors, and agonistic signaling. Using current assays for HLA antibody detection as a template and
replacing the generic reporter antibody with IgG subclass–specific reporter antibodies, it is possible to investigate the IgG
subclasses of HLA antibodies. There are 15 different IgG subclass compositions possible. Based on the capability to activate
the complement system and the class switch direction, 3 arbitrary patterns can be defined (ie, only complement-binding sub-
classes [IgG3 and/or IgG1], expansion to noncomplement-binding subclasses [IgG3 and/or IgG1 plus IgG2 and/or IgG4],
and switch to noncomplement-binding subclasses [IgG2 and/or IgG4]). The latter group accounts for less than 5%, whereas
the former 2 groups have a similar prevalence close to 50%. In the past 5 years, several studies correlated the IgG subclass
pattern with occurrence of antibody-mediated rejection and allograft outcomes. Because of differences of the used IgG sub-
class assay, the time point of analyses, and the definition of outcomes, a clear picture has not emerged yet. Future needs are
standardization of the assay, a more detailed knowledge of the initiated effector functions, and more well-designed clinical
studies also looking at changes of the IgG subclass pattern over time.
BIOLOGY OF IMMUNOGLOBULIN G SUBCLASS The isotype and subclass are determined by the constant
PRODUCTION region of the heavy chain encoded by discrete loci in the
immunoglobulin (Ig) complex. The human Ig system is di-
Immunoglobulin Genomic Organization
vided into 5 isotypes: IgM, IgD, IgA, IgE, and IgG. IgA and
Antibodies are heterodimeric glycoproteins composed IgG can be further subdivided into several subclasses. The
of 2 light chains and 2 heavy chains. Both the light and heavy chain constant region genes are ordered μ, δ, γ3, γ1,
heavy chains have variable regions that form the contact α1, γ2, γ4, ε, and α2.
site for the antigen (paratope) and constant regions that
enable protein assembly and mediate effector functions. The Basics of Class Switching
The molecular mechanisms by which B cells class switch
Received 4 November 2016. Revision received 9 December 2016. have been extensively studied. IgM is the first subclass to be
Accepted 13 December 2016. produced, and only antigen-experienced B cells undergo class
1
UCLA Immunogenetics Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory switching to other isotypes. The nature of the antigen influ-
Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA. ences IgG subclass production, with thymus (T)–independent
2
Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, Department of Biomedicine, University polysaccharide or glycolipid antigens typically inducing IgM
Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
and IgG2 and protein antigens canonically stimulating
3
HLA-Diagnostic and Immunogenetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine, IgG1 and IgG3. Production of most terminal IgG4 subclass
University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
is usually seen only with chronic antigen stimulation, such as
The authors declare no funding or conflicts of interest.
in the setting of allergy or parasitic infection. T-dependent
S.S. and N.V. contributed equally to the outline, research and writing of protein antigens stimulate follicular B cells that typically re-
the manuscript.
quire CD4+ T cell signaling to generate class-switched Igs
Correspondence: Nicole Valenzuela, PhD, UCLA Immunogenetics Center, Department
and for the establishment of memory B cells. Briefly, for-
of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Room
1-520, 1000 Veteran Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90095. (npyburn@mednet.ucla.edu); mation of a synapse between T and B cells facilitates
and Stefan Schaub, MD, MSc, Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and CD40-CD40L (CD154) interactions that prime the B cell.
Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031 Basel, Switzerland. Cytokines signal the B cell to switch the isotype and subclass
(stefan.schaub@usb.ch). of Ig and to secrete Ig (elegantly reviewed in a study by
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. Stavnezer et al1). A B cell that has switched to a downstream
ISSN: 0041-1337/18/10201S-S7 isotype or subclass is incapable of switching back to a more
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001816 upstream isotype.
monocytes
and some
FcγRIIIB
neutrophils
IgG4 often retain remnants of upstream switch regions,2
+++
+++
NA2
-
suggesting that class switch recombination occurs in a step-
wise manner. Moreover, the variable regions of IgG2 and
IgG4 often exhibit more extensive somatic hypermutation
than IgG1 or IgG3 and may be of higher antigen affinity than
monocytes
and some
earlier subclasses.
FcγRIIIB
neutrophils
+++
+++
NA1
It is known that the T follicular–associated interleukin
-
(IL)-21 and TH2-associated cytokines such as IL-4,
IL-13, and IL-10 influence Ig isotype and subclass produc-
tion.3,4 But to date, no dedicated switch factor for any
FcγRIIIA-V158
given Ig subclass has been identified, and the signals
NK cells
governing specification of which isotype or subclass is
+++
+++
+
+
used are incompletely defined. Effort is needed to further
elucidate the signals controlling subclass specification, par-
ticularly in the setting of alloimmunization.
FcγRIIIA-F158
NK cells
+++
++
–
-
STRUCTURE AND EFFECTOR FUNCTIONS
OF IGG SUBCLASSES
Although the constant regions of the different gamma
dendritic cells
subclasses are more than 90% homologous, their effector
B cells, and
neutrophils,
functions and affinity for antigen can vary significantly. IgG1
FcγRIIB
Monocytes,
++
is by far the most abundant subclass in serum, and IgG3 has
+
-
the shortest half-life of only 7 days. The constant region of
IgG3 has the longest hinge region, yielding the most flexibility
and accessibility to effector molecules. The hinge regions of
IgG2 and IgG4 are much shorter, and these molecules exhibit
Monocytes and
FcγRIIA-R131
neutrophils
more rigidity. Variations in the species of N-linked glycan +++
+++
at the heavy chain constant region 2 (CH2) can dramatically
+
-
affect antibody effector function.5 Contact sites for engaging
complement C1q and Fc gamma receptors (FcγRs) overlap
in this CH2 domain, and this is where much of the diversity
between IgG subclasses is observed.
Monocytes and
FcγRIIA-H131
neutrophils
Complement
+++
+++
++
neutrophils
+++
+++
IgG that are required for C1q binding have been identified.7
Because host cells express a constellation of complement
regulatory proteins antagonizing the complement cascade,
only very high titers of antibody and/or the stronger
Complement
++++
+++
has the highest affinity for antigen but the lowest capacity
to elicit effector functions, it has been proposed that chronic
antigen exposure stimulates IgG4 as a mechanism of limiting
IgG1
IgG2
IgG3
IgG4
FIGURE 1. IgG subclass patterns of HLA antibodies observed in three different populations.18,19,21
suggest that an expansion to noncomplement-binding sub- posttransplant HLA-DSA being IgG3 and IgM positive are
classes indicates an advanced immune response stimulated by associated with a high risk of renal allograft failure. O'Leary
a longer and more intense antigen exposure. It is still unknown, et al29 observed a trend toward inferior survival of liver allo-
under which conditions a complete switch to noncomplement- graft recipients with pretransplant IgG3 positive HLA-DSA.
binding subclasses with loss of IgG1/3-producing plasma cells A very interesting topic is the dynamic evolution of HLA-
will occur. DSA IgG subclasses from pretransplant to posttransplant.
So far, this has only been systematically investigated by
Khovanova et al25 using sera obtained within the first 30 days
CLINICAL STUDIES INVESTIGATING THE UTILITY posttransplant. They observed changes in the IgG subclass pro-
OF IGG SUBCLASS ASSAYS files, but the correlation with clinical outcomes was rather weak.
The presence of HLA-DSA pretransplant or posttransplant Another interesting question is the biological significance
is associated with an increased risk for ABMR and allograft of IgG2/IgG4 HLA-DSA when present together with IgG1/
loss. However, individual patients with HLA-DSA demon- IgG3 HLA-DSA. As previously mentioned, some clinical
strate a wide spectrum ranging from uneventful clinical studies suggest that an expansion to these noncomplement-
courses to severe ABMR with subsequent allograft loss. binding subclasses indicates an advanced immune response
Several studies investigated whether an IgG subclass analy- enabled by ongoing T cell help. These IgG2/IgG4 antibodies
sis of HLA-DSA helps to improve prediction of ABMR and might induce complement activation in synergy with IgG1/
allograft loss. IgG3 antibodies if they target different epitopes on the same
Table 2 summarizes those 10 studies that analyzed all 4 IgG HLA molecule.30 On the other hand, if the IgG2/IgG4 antibod-
subclasses. Because of the different settings (eg, pretransplant vs ies are directed against the same epitope as the IgG1/IgG3 anti-
posttransplant), different IgG subclass assay protocols and bodies, they could potentially block IgG1/IgG3-dependent
cutoffs, and different definitions of outcomes, it is currently complement activation. We found in in vitro experiments
impossible to draw any firm conclusions. It seems that the that this blocking effect starts when IgG2/IgG4 are present
pretransplant IgG subclass pattern is not very predictive for in 2-fold higher concentrations than IgG1/IgG3 and it is al-
ABMR and allograft loss. By contrast, the posttrans- most complete at a 10-fold excess (Hönger et al18).
plant presence of high IgG3 levels or an expansion to
noncomplement-binding subclasses likely provide diagnostic
and prognostic value beyond the generic SA assay regarding
prediction of the ABMR phenotype and the clinical course of FUTURE NEEDS
ABMR. Whether this information is clinically helpful to The humoral immune response against HLA antigens is
guide treatment strategies is still unknown. very complex, because the target is highly polymorphic; the
There are several other studies that investigated only 1 sin- process is dynamic and has different effector functions largely
gle IgG subclass regarding prediction of allograft failure. depending on the IgG subclasses. Therefore, deciphering
Such a study design might introduce a bias because the effect the precise role of IgG subclasses requires progress in
of other individual IgG subclasses and specific IgG subclass several areas.
mixtures cannot be fully investigated. We only highlight First, the IgG subclass assay needs to be standardized to
2 studies in this context. Everly et al28 found that de novo such an extent that comparison between studies is possible.
IgG subclass
Analyzed samples Author, year detection Ab Assay (cutoff ) Organ (n) Population Clinical association
17
© 2017 Wolters Kluwer
Pretransplant Griffiths et al, 2004 IgG1—8C/6-39 Flow cross match with Kidney (20) Patients with pretransplant • Skewing toward IgG1 (only IgG1 pos.)
IgG2—HP6014 surrogate cells class I DSA compared with skewing away from IgG1
IgG3—HP6050 (=IgG2/3/4 dominant) associated with
IgG4—HP6025 lower graft survival
Pretransplant Hönger et al, 201119 IgG1—HP6001 Single antigen beads Kidney (74) Patients with pretransplant DSA • Subclass profile not associated with
IgG2—31-7-4 (individual for each development and severity of ABMR
IgG3—HP6050 subclass and bead) • Isolated IgG2/4 likely less ABMR
IgG4—HP6025
Pretransplant and Gao et al, 200416 Not reported Flow cross match Kidney (7) Not reported • 1/7 kidney allografts were lost due to
posttransplant Liver (6) hyperacute ABMR. This patient had
high pretransplant IgG3.
Pretransplant and Cicciarelli et al, 201324 IgG1—HP6001 Single antigen beads Kidney (3) Patients with pretransplant DSA • Case series (no statistical analysis)
posttransplant IgG2—HP6002 (likely MFI > 500) Heart (4)
IgG3—HP6047
IgG4—HP6023
Pretransplant and Khovanova et al, 201525 IgG1—4E3 Single antigen beads Kidney (80) Patients with pretransplant DSA • Pretransplant IgG1 presence and IgG4
posttransplant IgG2—31-7-4 (individual for levels associated with rejection
IgG3—HP6050 each subclass) within 30 days
IgG4—HP6025 • Pretransplant IgG1 levels and IgG4
presence associated with allograft failure
• Posttransplant presence or levels of
IgG1/IgG4 were associated with rejection
and graft failure
Pretransplant and Lefaucheur et al, 201622 IgG1—HP6001 Single antigen beads Kidney (186) Patient with pretransplant DSA • IgG3 associated with clinical ABMR and
posttransplant and Viglietti et al, 201626 IgG2—31-7-4 (mostly MFI > 500) (n = 110) and patients decreased death-censored graft survival
IgG3—HP6050 with posttransplant DSA • IgG4 associated with subclinical ABMR
IgG4—HP6025 (n = 186; de novo and
persisting pretransplant DSA)
Posttransplant Arnold et al, 201423 IgG1—HP6001 Single antigen beads Kidney (94) Patients with posttransplant • Expansion from IgG1/3 alone to
IgG2—31-7-4 (likely MFI > 1000) de novo DSA IgG1/3 plus IgG2/4 had a higher
IgG3—HP6050 rate of ABMR but similar allograft survival
IgG4—HP6025
S11
S12 Transplantation ■ January 2018 ■ Volume 102 ■ Number 1S www.transplantjournal.com
Second, because patients typically mount a mixed subclass 9. Arnold ML, Fuernrohr BG, Weiss KM, et al. Association of a coding poly-
morphism in Fc gamma receptor 2A and graft survival in re-transplant can-
alloimmune response, the individual contribution of each
didates. Hum Immunol. 2015;76:759–764.
subclass can be difficult to dissect in these studies. It is unclear 10. Bournazos S, Woof JM, Hart SP, et al. Functional and clinical consequences
whether the predominance of IgG4 late in transplant and its of Fc receptor polymorphic and copy number variants. Clin Exp Immunol.
association with chronic rejection reflects the particular 2009;157:244–254.
pathogenic effect of this subclass or rather is indicative of 11. Valenzuela NM, Trinh KR, Mulder A, et al. Monocyte recruitment by HLA
IgG-activated endothelium: the relationship between IgG subclass and
sustained alloimmune activation.
FcγRIIa polymorphisms. Am J Transplant. 2015;15:1502–1518.
Third, the clinical relevance of each subclass is beginning 12. Jin YP, Valenzuela NM, Ziegler ME, et al. Everolimus inhibits anti-
to be revealed, but the mechanisms of graft injury elicited HLA I antibody-mediated endothelial cell signaling, migration and
by different donor specific IgG subclasses are mostly un- proliferation more potently than sirolimus. Am J Transplant. 2014;
characterized. Certainly, complement activation is a key path- 14:806–819.
13. Li F, Zhang X, Jin YP, et al. Antibody ligation of human leukocyte antigen
ological mechanism of graft injury, but it is not absolutely class I molecules stimulates migration and proliferation of smooth muscle
required for rejection in humans or in animal models.16,31 cells in a focal adhesion kinase-dependent manner. Hum Immunol. 2011;
NK cells and macrophages also seem to play an important role 72:1150–1159.
during ABMR.31-33 However, the contributions of FcγR- 14. Valenzuela NM, Hong L, Shen XD, et al. Blockade of p-selectin is sufficient
to reduce MHC I antibody-elicited monocyte recruitment in vitro and in
mediated functions and differential capacity of IgG sub-
vivo. Am J Transplant. 2013;13:299–311.
classes to elicit antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity 15. Li F, Wei J, Valenzuela NM, et al. Phosphorylated S6 kinase and S6
and phagocytosis have yet to be fully elucidated in the context ribosomal protein are diagnostic markers of antibody-mediated
of antibody mediated rejection. rejection in heart allografts. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34:
Fourth, the factors regulating isotype and subclass spec- 580–587.
16. Gao ZH, McAlister VC, Wright JR Jr, et al. Immunoglobulin-G sub-
ification are incompletely understood. Different routes of class antidonor reactivity in transplant recipients. Liver Transpl. 2004;10:
allosensitization seem to stimulate distinct subclass reper- 1055–1059.
toires,20 but the milieu of B cell activation during different 17. Griffiths EJ, Nelson RE, Dupont PJ, et al. Skewing of pretransplant anti-
alloantigen exposures is uncharacterized. That de novo HLA class I antibodies of immunoglobulin G isotype solely toward immu-
noglobulin G1 subclass is associated with poorer renal allograft survival.
donor-specific antibody production is highly associated
Transplantation. 2004;77:1771–1773.
with medication nonadherence34,35 implies that current 18. Hönger G, Amico P, Arnold ML, Dupont PJ, Spriewald BM, Schaub S. Ef-
T cell–directed immunosuppression does have some effect fects of weak/non-complement-binding HLA antibodies on C1q-binding.
on B cell activation and antibody production. In the studies HLA. 2017;90:88–94.
discussed earlier, each center used different induction thera- 19. Honger G, Hopfer H, Arnold ML, et al. Pretransplant IgG subclasses of
donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies and development of
pies. Little is known about how class switching might differ af- antibody-mediated rejection. Transplantation. 2011;92:41–47.
ter induction therapies or under immunosuppressive regimens 20. Lowe D, Higgins R, Zehnder D, et al. Significant IgG subclass het-
that are used in transplant patients. More studies are needed to erogeneity in HLA-specific antibodies: implications for pathogenic-
describe the “natural history” of anti-HLA IgG subclasses in ity, prognosis, and the rejection response. Hum Immunol. 2013;74:
666–672.
the pretransplant and posttransplant periods and to under-
21. Kaneku H, O'Leary JG, Taniguchi M, et al. Donor-specific human leuko-
stand how they correlate with clinical outcome. cyte antigen antibodies of the immunoglobulin G3 subclass are associ-
Finally, the measurement of all 4 IgG subclasses in addi- ated with chronic rejection and graft loss after liver transplantation. Liver
tion to the generic SA assay is quite expensive. These costs Transpl. 2012;18:984–992.
seem only be justified if the IgG subclass information pro- 22. Lefaucheur C, Viglietti D, Bentlejewski C, et al. IgG donor-specific anti-
human HLA antibody subclasses and kidney allograft antibody-
vides substantial diagnostic and/or prognostic value beyond
mediated injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27:293–304.
the generic SA assay. 23. Arnold ML, Ntokou IS, Doxiadis II, et al. Donor-specific HLA antibod-
ies: evaluating the risk for graft loss in renal transplant recipients
with isotype switch from complement fixing IgG1/IgG3 to noncomplement
REFERENCES fixing IgG2/IgG4 anti-HLA alloantibodies. Transpl Int. 2014;27:253–261.
24. Cicciarelli JC, Kasahara N, Lemp NA, et al. Immunoglobulin G subclass
1. Stavnezer J, Guikema JE, Schrader CE. Mechanism and regulation of
analysis of HLA donor specific antibodies in heart and renal transplant re-
class switch recombination. Annu Rev Immunol. 2008;26:261–292.
cipients. Clin Transpl. 2013:413–422.
2. Jackson KJ, Wang Y, Collins AM. Human immunoglobulin classes and
25. Khovanova N, Daga S, Shaikhina T, et al. Subclass analysis of donor HLA-
subclasses show variability in VDJ gene mutation levels. Immunol Cell Biol.
specific IgG in antibody-incompatible renal transplantation reveals a signif-
2014;92:729–733.
icant association of IgG4 with rejection and graft failure. Transpl Int. 2015;
3. Avery DT, Bryant VL, Ma CS, et al. IL-21-induced isotype switching to IgG
28:1405–1415.
and IgA by human naive B cells is differentially regulated by IL-4. J Immunol.
26. Viglietti D, Loupy A, Vernerey D, et al. Value of donor-specific anti-HLA
2008;181:1767–1779.
antibody monitoring and characterization for risk stratification of kid-
4. Jumper MD, Splawski JB, Lipsky PE, et al. Ligation of CD40 induces ster-
ney allograft loss. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28:702–715.
ile transcripts of multiple Ig H chain isotypes in human B cells. J Immunol.
1994;152:438–445. 27. Kannabhiran D, Everly MJ, Walker-McDermott JK, et al. Changes in
5. Allhorn M, Briceno JG, Baudino L, et al. The IgG-specific endoglycosidase IgG subclasses of donor specific anti-HLA antibodies following
EndoS inhibits both cellular and complement-mediated autoimmune he- bortezomib-based therapy for antibody mediated rejection. Clin Transpl.
molysis. Blood. 2010;115:5080–5088. 2012:229–235.
6. Bruhns P, Iannascoli B, England P, et al. Specificity and affinity of human Fc 28. Everly JM, Rebellato LM, Haisch CE, et al. Impact of IgM and IgG3 anti-
gamma receptors and their polymorphic variants for human IgG sub- HLA alloantibodies in primary renal allograft recipients. Transplantation.
classes. Blood. 2009;113:3716–3725. 2014;97:494–501.
7. Sondermann P, Szymkowski DE. Harnessing Fc receptor biology in 29. O'Leary JG, Kaneku H, Banuelos N, et al. Impact of IgG3 subclass and
the design of therapeutic antibodies. Curr Opin Immunol. 2016;40: C1q-fixing donor-specific HLA alloantibodies on rejection and survival in
78–87. liver transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2015;15:1003–1013.
8. van der Zee JS, van Swieten P, Aalberse RC. Inhibition of comple- 30. Kushihata F, Watanabe J, Mulder A, et al. Human leukocyte anti-
ment activation by IgG4 antibodies. Clin Exp Immunol. 1986;64: gen antibodies and human complement activation: role of IgG subclass,
415–422. specificity, and cytotoxic potential. Transplantation. 2004;78:995–1001.
31. Hirohashi T, Chase CM, Della Pelle P, et al. A novel pathway of chronic al- 34. Wiebe C, Gibson IW, Blydt-Hansen TD, et al. Rates and determi-
lograft rejection mediated by NK cells and alloantibody. Am J Transplant. nants of progression to graft failure in kidney allograft recipients
2012;12:313–321. with de novo donor-specific antibody. Am J Transplant. 2015;15:
32. Kobashigawa J, Crespo-Leiro MG, Ensminger SM, et al. Report from a 2921–2930.
consensus conference on antibody-mediated rejection in heart transplan- 35. Pizzo HP, Ettenger RB, Gjertson DW, et al. Sirolimus and tacrolimus
tation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011;30:252–269. coefficient of variation is associated with rejection, donor-
33. Hidalgo LG, Sellares J, Sis B, et al. Interpreting NK cell transcripts versus T cell specific antibodies, and nonadherence. Pediatr Nephrol. 2016;
transcripts in renal transplant biopsies. Am J Transplant. 2012;12:1180–1191. 31:2345–2352.