Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Boonanuntanasarn 2015
Boonanuntanasarn 2015
2015
..........................................................................................
doi: 10.1111/anu.12302
1 1 1 2
1
School of Animal Production Technology, Institute of Agricultural Technology, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon
Ratchasima, Thailand; 2 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Naresuan University, Muang, Phitsanulok, Thailand
..............................................................................................
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
After intestinal sampling for histological analysis, the Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Win-
remaining intestinal samples with known weight were dows, version 10 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All data
aseptically pooled and homogenized in sterilized peptone were analysed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).
water (0.85% NaCl). Homogenized samples were diluted When significant differences were found among groups,
serially with peptone water, and 100 lL aliquots was Duncan’s multiple range test was conducted to rank.
spread-plated (in triplicate for each treatment) on a set of Throughout the experiment, effects and differences were
five semiselective agars. Total counts of bacteria, Lactoba- declared to be significant at P < 0.05.
cilli, Bifidobacterium, fungi and Vibrio spp. were obtained
by plating on plate count agar (PCA), MRS agar, Raffi-
nose Bifidobacterium agar, sabouraud dextrose agar and
thiosulfate-citrate-bile salts-sucrose agar plates (TCBS), Table 2 shows the growth performance and survival rates
respectively. Bacterial population numbers were recorded of experimental shrimp. Administration of the b-glu and b-
as a logarithm of colony-forming units per gram of intes- glu+Pa diets for 90 days resulted in significantly higher
tine (Log CFU g 1). (P < 0.05) final weight, weight gain and body length com-
pared to values for the control group. Supplementation
with b-glucan and B. subtilis did not significantly result in
a higher body weight compared to the control group. There
Concentrations of the following haemolymph constituents were no significant differences in feed efficiency (FE) and
were measured: glucose, triglyceride, cholesterol, total pro- survival rate among the experimental treatments.
tein, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and chloride. Haemol- Table 3 showed the analysis of proximate chemical com-
ymph glucose content was measured by the glucose oxidase position of the experimental shrimp meat. Comparing to
method using a Ransod Kit (Randox, Crumlin, UK). the control shrimp, shrimp fed b-glu or b-glu and probiot-
Triglyceride concentration was measured using the glyc- ics had higher moisture content (P < 0.05). In addition, sig-
erol-3-phosphate oxidase-sodium N-ethyl-N-(3-sulfopropyl) nificant increase in protein content in meat was observed in
m-anisidine (GPO-ESPAS) method described by Bucolo & shrimp fed b-glu and b-glu+Pa diets (P < 0.05). Only
David (1973). Cholesterol content was quantitatively deter- shrimp fed the b-glu+Bs diet had higher ash content in the
Experimental diets
Initial weight (g) 0.15 0.02 0.15 0.02 0.16 0.02 0.16 0.02
Final weight (g) 3.45 0.36a 5.30 0.73b 4.51 0.41ab 5.20 0.38b
Weight gain2 (g) 3.29 0.36a 5.16 0.74b 4.36 0.42ab 5.04 0.38b
Total length (cm) 7.66 0.26a 9.14 0.25b 8.35 0.48ab 9.28 0.08b
FE3 0.37 0.04 0.54 0.08 0.45 0.05 0.51 0.04
Survival (%) 80.0 5.7 80.0 3.5 77.1 7.3 85.7 7.8
1
Values are means SD of five replicates. Means with a different superscript in each row differed significantly from each other
(P < 0.05).
2
Weight gain = final mean body weight initial mean body weight.
3
Feed efficiency (FE) = wet weight gain 9 dry feed fed 1.
..............................................................................................
Table 4 Microbiota population in the intestine of Litopenaeus vannamei that were fed the experimental diets (mean SD, n = 5)1
45 days
C 6.6 0.9 5.2 0.7b 5.5 0.7 5.7 0.7 6.3 0.7a
b-glu 5.9 1.2 5.5 0.5ab 5.5 0.9 6.2 0.9 6.1 0.5a
b-glu+Bs 6.5 0.6 6.5 0.8a 6.2 1.3 6.5 0.6 5.2 0.4b
b-glu+Pa 6.3 0.4 5.9 1.1ab 5.4 1.2 6.4 1.0 5.1 0.8b
90 days
C 6.2 0.7 4.8 0.7b 5.6 0.4 5.5 0.9 6.1 0.6a
b-glu 6.0 0.5 4.9 0.4b 4.9 0.9 5.4 0.7 5.4 0.5a
b-glu+Bs 6.7 0.8 6.1 1.0a 5.6 1.0 6.3 0.7 4.5 0.4b
b-glu+Pa 5.9 0.4 5.4 0.5ab 5.0 0.6 5.5 0.6 5.5 0.7a
1
Means with different superscripts in each column differed significantly from each other (P < 0.05).
..............................................................................................
0.3 0.1
0.2 0
Control β-Glu β-Glu+ β-Glu+ Control β-Glu β-Glu+ β-Glu+
Bs Pa Bs Pa
60 100
Triglyceride (μmol L–1)
0 0
Control β-Glu β-Glu+ β-Glu+ Control β-Glu β-Glu+ β-Glu+
Bs Pa Bs Pa
1.00 40
Chloride (mmol L–1)
BUN (mmol L–1)
0.75 30
0.50 20
0.25 10
0.00 0
Control β-Glu β-Glu+ β-Glu+ Control β-Glu β-Glu+ β-Glu+
Bs Pa Bs Pa
1500
Osmolarity (mosm kg–1)
a
ab ab
b
1250 Figure 2 Haemolymph constituents of
Litopenaeus vannamei that were fed the
experimental diets for 90 days. The dif-
1000
ferent letters denote significant differ-
Control β-Glu β-Glu+ β-Glu+ ences in haemolymph constituents
Bs Pa among experimental diets at P < 0.05.
showed that higher growth was observed in shrimp fed the in numerous studies. For instance, Artemia enriched with
b-glucan alone. These data indicate that the effects of P. acidilactici improved weight gain of Pollock larvae
b-glucan on growth might be species specific and/or depend (Gatesoupe 2002). In contrast, the use of P. acidilactici as
on the b-glucan source, administration method and dura- probiotic supplementation did not improve growth perfor-
tion of supplementation. In addition, neither dietary mance in rainbow trout (Aubin et al. 2005; Merrifield et al.
b-glu+Pa nor b-glu+Bs significantly improved shrimp 2011), Nile tilapia (Shelby et al. 2006) or channel catfish
growth compared to dietary b-glucan alone, suggesting that (Shelby et al. 2007).
no synbiotic effect on growth enhancement in shrimp. Bacillus subtilis has been used widely as a probiotic in
Our results showed that cosupplementation with the pre- shrimp culture (Balc azar et al. 2007; Liu et al. 2009; Sap-
biotic b-glucan and the microencapsulated probiotic charoen & Rengpipat 2013). In our study, cosupplementa-
P. acidilactici had significant beneficial effects on growth of tion with b-glucan and B. subtilis resulted in a non-
L. vannamei. Although reports of the application of significant increase in growth compared to the control diet.
P. acidilactici as a probiotic in shrimp aquaculture are lim- There have been reports of different effects on growth
ited, its use as a probiotic in fish culture has been described response among different B. subtilis strains. For example,
..............................................................................................
..............................................................................................