Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MEC600 Group Assignment CSR 13 OCT 2021
MEC600 Group Assignment CSR 13 OCT 2021
MEC600 Group Assignment CSR 13 OCT 2021
OBJECTIVES
CO PO/ EAC LO SS
MOHE Learning outcome
MOHE Domains
SOFT
SKILL
2 CO2 [PO6, LO5, PO6- The LO5- Social SS4- Ethics &
SS3];{ A4}. Engineer and Skills, Moral
Society Teamwork and Professionalis
Responsibilities m
(A)
3 CO3 [PO7, LO6, PO7; LO6- Values, SS4- Ethics &
SS4];{ A4}. Environment Ethics, Moral Moral
and and Professionalism
Sustainability: Professionalism
(A)
5 CO5 PO12- Project LO8- SS6-Entrepreneurial
[PO12, LO8, Management Management Skills
SS6];{C5}. and Finance and
Entrepreneurshi
p (C)
INTRODUCTION
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is the concept whereby companies
act to balance their own economic growth with the sustainable social and
environmental development of their areas of operation.
Community service is a non-paying job performed by one person or a group
of people for the benefit of the community or its institutions.
Environmental Sustainability is defined as responsible interaction with the
environment to avoid depletion or degradation of natural resources and allow
for long-term environmental quality.
Sustainability focuses on meeting the needs of the present without
compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs
Project management is the practice of initiating, planning, executing,
controlling, and closing the work of a team to achieve specific goals and meet
specific success criteria at the specified time.
SDG
Example CSR
Samsung Corporate Social Responsibility: Bringing Light to Ethiopia
Improves Life for Youth https://youtu.be/gt-ga9hdZ0w
e-CSR Guideline:
e-CSR must be based on pedagogy service learning and online.
e-CSR* can utilise appropriate modern technology, emphasising the need to make
use of computers and multimedia technology to help and provide service to the
society
PERINGATAN:
1. Dilarang menggunakan LOGO UiTM dan mengutip derma/sumbangan tanpa
kebenaran pihak UiTM.
2. Dilarang meletakkan nama dan no akaun bank peribadi untuk mengutip
derma/sumbangan.
3. Boleh membantu NGO dalam urusan mengikut derma/sumbangan atas dasar
ahli pasukkan NGO .
• etc
EVALUATION FORM
MEC600 - ENGINEER IN SOCIETY
GROUP ASSIGNMENT- Community Service & PROJECT MANAGEMENT
**
Instruction – Submission
1. Rename your file as your FULL NAME & ID No
2. Upload the Report File(s) in the Main Submission platforms: *Turnitin
*Please upload a Single file in a provided column for Turnitin.
* Please write your FULL NAME & ID No at Submission title (refer example)
3. Submit your report at Ufuture
4. Back up Platform: Upload the Report File(s) in the Google Classroom (click a
button Turn in)
- Report (PDF and Ms Word)
Note- Lecturer will mark your assignment base on submitting files at Turnitin.
Assessment Criteria
PO
Assessment Criteria Very Poor: 1-2 Poor: 3-4 Satisfactory: 5-6 Good: 7-8 Excellent: 9-10
PO6 A Research on CSR and SDG
WK7 The team needs to clearly
WP1, understand the principle
WP4 underlying CSR activities Low impact to society Huge impact to society with
The CSR project must at with acceptable concrete sustainable design
Huge impact to society
least related/aligned to sustainable and details explanation
with concrete
one of United Nation Measurement on the consideration and Fully support United Nation
Impact of the sustainable design
Sustainable Goal (SDG) impact was available support United Nation Sustainable Goal
activity measured Fully support United
Discuss the impact of with limited concern on Sustainable Goal
but no sustainable Nation Sustainable Goal
CSR in term of human sustainability and State - Elaborate how other
assessment - Explain how other
society, world, health, support United Nation -State how other peoples are doing it in
Not support United peoples are doing it in
culture, legal, etc Sustainable Goal peoples are doing it in Malaysia as well as all over
Nation Sustainable Malaysia as well as all
Elaborate at least 10 Goal
- State how others Malaysia as well as all
over the world and the
the world relevant with your
programs on how other done but not relevant over the world and the selected CSR theme and
-State the others challenges if yours team
people are doing CSR with your CSR theme challenges if yours team discuss the challenges if
done in general want to carry out the
with aligned with SDG The CSR project is want to carry out the yours team want to carry out
activities
(Malaysia and Oversea) relevant with UN activities the activities
The CSR project is The CSR project is
support with relevant Sustainability Goal The CSR project is The CSR project is relevant
not relevant with UN relevant with UN
pictures, systematic (SDG) but no relevant with UN with UN Sustainability Goal
Sustainability Goal Sustainability Goal
diagrams, sketches, etc . discussion toward the Sustainability Goal (SDG), contain complete
(SDG) (SDG) and discussion
Discuss the challenges in issue (SDG) but no discussion on the effect to
toward the issue is well
terms of human society, comprehensive the issue with realistic
presented.
world, health, culture, discussion toward the suggestion/solution
legal, cost, etc if you team issue proposed.
want to carry out the
similar activities have
been done by others
PO6 B Identify Social Issue/ Insufficient Weak Some explanations on Acceptable CSR Good CSR explanation Comprehensive explanations
WK7 Problem /Objective & KPI Subject Knowledge the CSR concept. The explanation with limited and sufficient examples & characterization of CSR as
WP1,W Suggest at least 1 on CSR problem is mentioned example. The problem is on CSR implementation well as past examples The
problem that your team Problem without Objective & identified with The Problem is identified Problem is clearly identified
P4
think is worth to work on Identification, KPI Acceptable Objective with Strong Objective with Strong Objective and
through Community Objective & KPI -Some level of minute but without KPI and acceptable KPI Measureable KPI
service program. -The minute meeting -Satisfactory -Good of minute meeting -Comprehensive
Assessment Criteria
PO
Assessment Criteria Very Poor: 1-2 Poor: 3-4 Satisfactory: 5-6 Good: 7-8 Excellent: 9-10
Identify the measurable
impact: societal, health,
safety, legal and cultural
issues and the
consequent
responsibilities and
sustainable concerns to
the society of the selected explanations in minute
meeting unclear of minute meeting
CSR meeting
Specify the intellectual /
physical / energy
resources of the
university to solve the
problem faced by the
community.
PO6 C Site Visit and - Site visit is not -Conduct site visit last Conduct a site visit -Conduct a site visit -Conduct at least 2 site visit
WK7 Communications conducted minute and not and/or communicate and/or communicate and/or communicate with a
WP1,W Search the information communicate with a selected PIC with with a selected PIC with selected PIC with will involve
through online -The evident is effectively will involve with your will involve with your with your program
P4
Conduct the site visit unclear -The level of program -The level of program. -The level of communicate,
and/or communicate with communicate Assess communicate Assess -The level of assess societal, health,
a selected PIC who will societal, health, safety, societal, health, safety, communicate Assess safety, legal and cultural
involve with your program legal and cultural legal and cultural issues societal, health, safety, issues and the consequent
Provide evidence on issues and the and the consequent legal and cultural issues responsibilities are
communication activities consequent responsibilities are and the consequent excellence.
such as minutes of responsibilities are satisfactory responsibilities are good
meeting, photos and link accepted -Satisfactory -Good on provide the -Comprehensive
video recording of Evident of activities Evident of activities explanations on Evident of
meeting. -Some level of Evident activities
COMMUNICATION: of activities
Student engagement and
team communication.
The team may also
involve other related
organizations such as
Majlis Perbandaran,
JKKP, Company, NGO’s
or clubs that are willing to
work together for your
team’s CSR program.
Assessment Criteria
PO
Assessment Criteria Very Poor: 1-2 Poor: 3-4 Satisfactory: 5-6 Good: 7-8 Excellent: 9-10
Provide a formal
university-community
cooperation agreement (if
any).
PO12 D Program Planning and Step by step Systematic Task were developed to A clear statement on A clear statement on vision,
development, Budget, development in development plan meet limited objective of vision, mission and mission and values were
Communication, Risk- utilise producing limited which produces the program values were systematically align to the
project management tools program task Adequate task details systematically align to task.
i. Program Planning: information Satisfactory level affords the task Involve other related
List out all the strategy & planning Some level affords to to get sponsorship/ Good level affords to get organizations such as NGO’s
activities to carry out get sponsorship/ donation from outside sponsorship/ donation or clubs that willing to work
the Community Poorly afford to get donation from outside parties. from outside parties. together
service program sponsorship/ parties.
from the initial set-up donation from Minimum 10 volunteers More 15 volunteers from Excellence level afford to get
of the team, outside parties. Less than 10 from other faculties other faculties and/or sponsorship/ donation from
execution, volunteers from other and/or outsider outsider outside parties.
monitoring until Less than 10 faculties and/or
measurement of the volunteers. outsider Satisfactory in utilize the Good in utilize the More than 20 volunteers from
performance. The project management project management other faculties and/or
duration of Not utilize the Some level of utilize tools. tools. outsider
community service project the project
activity is at least 6 management tools. management tools. Excellence in utilize the
hours (Not including project management tools.
travel hours).
Provide a formal
university-
community
cooperation
agreement (MOU /
MOA / LOI / IP).
ii. Collection &
Sponsorship:
Identify the strategy
& planning to get
sponsorship/
Assessment Criteria
PO
Assessment Criteria Very Poor: 1-2 Poor: 3-4 Satisfactory: 5-6 Good: 7-8 Excellent: 9-10
donation from
outside parties in
terms of goods
(Refer guideline for
KPI) that will be
utilized to help a
person or
establishment.
iii. Participance/
Volunteer: Planning
and strategy to find a
suitable number of
volunteers. No of
participant/volunteer-
refer guideline. At
least of one (1)
stakeholders’
involvement
Government
Agencies, Industries,
Civil Society, NGOs,
Learning Institutions,
etc.). For project
involve talk/seminar,
the target participant
and expected
participant must be
determined.
iv. BUDGET: Plan the
budget for the
materials of program
v. Tools : List of facility
/ Tools / Equipment /
Machinery / System
invented for the
community
vi. COMMUNICATION:
- AT PART C
vii. RISK: Register the
risk of your program
and suggest the
Assessment Criteria
PO
Assessment Criteria Very Poor: 1-2 Poor: 3-4 Satisfactory: 5-6 Good: 7-8 Excellent: 9-10
prevention action.
SOP- Covid19.
Assessment Criteria
PO
Assessment Criteria Very Poor: 1-2 Poor: 3-4 Satisfactory: 5-6 Good: 7-8 Excellent: 9-10
PO12 F Implementation & Monitoring The details of Activity of the program Some level of time line Time line with specific Details of overall program
Plan activity was not is available but not is available without milestone been activities, time line and
Refer to part D –report the clearly identified structured. monitoring element developed responsible person and
activity before and after the -sponsorship/ donation department were clearly
program -sponsorship/ -sponsorship/ donation -sponsorship/ donation from outside parties in stated
Report either your program donation from from outside parties in from outside parties in terms of goods (worth at -Involve other related
deliverables are developed outside parties in terms of goods (worth terms of goods (worth at least RM1000 and organizations such as NGO’s
and completed, adhering to a terms of goods Less than RM500 ) least RM500 and above) above) that will be made or clubs that willing to work
mapped-out plan. (worth less than that will be made to that will be made to help to help a person or together
xi. Actual time and RM200 that will be help a person or a person or establishment
activities of program made to help a establishment establishment -sponsorship/ donation from
person or -Minimum 10 volunteers outside parties in terms of
xii. List down the name establishment -Minimum 2 volunteers -Minimum 5 volunteers from other faculties goods (worth at least
of your sponsorship, from other faculties from other faculties and/or outsider. RM1500 and above) that will
collaborative -No volunteers from and/or outsider. and/or outsider. In total volunteer must be made to help a person or
partnership, and other faculties In total volunteers In total volunteers must more than 20 establishment
other related and/or outsider. must more than 10 more than 15 -Minimum 20 volunteers, at
organizations In total volunteers Good explanation in the least 15 from other faculties
involved –if any. must more than 5 -The expenses vs -The expenses vs expense’s vs budget, and/or outsider.
Value of sponsorship budget, Meeting budget, Meeting Minute, Meeting Minute, Post In total volunteer must more
or other related The expenses vs Minute, Post mortem Post mortem – Mortem than 30
contribution must be budget, Meeting some level of satisfactory level -Comprehensive
reported and Minute, Post acceptance Good in utilize the explanations in in the
evidence. mortem unclear -Satisfactory in utilize project management expense’s vs budget,
xiii. List the item and/or -Some level of utilize the project management tools Meeting Minute, Post Mortem
value from Not utilize the the project tools. -Good on provide the
sponsorship project management tools -Satisfactory Evident of activities -Excellence in utilize the
/donation. management tools. -Some level of Evident Evident of activities project management tools.
-The evident of activities
xiv. List down the
unclear -Comprehensive
volunteer’s name
explanations on Evident of
either from other
activities
faculties and/or
outsider. The list of
actual participants
must be provided
xv. Actual expenses vs
Assessment Criteria
PO
Assessment Criteria Very Poor: 1-2 Poor: 3-4 Satisfactory: 5-6 Good: 7-8 Excellent: 9-10
budget
xvi. Evident of
communication
during program-
Refer part G
xvii. Challenges and
action taken during
the program
xviii. Certificate of
Appreciation / Thank
you letter to
participant,
sponsorship,
speaker, volunteers,
etc
xix. List of award (if any)
xx. Contribution /
Funding – Evidence
(if any)
RM - Copy of Bank
Slip / Cheque/ EFT
Letter / Note / E-mail
indicating the
contribution in the
form of In kind / Gift /
Facilities /
Equipment
Assessment Criteria
PO
Assessment Criteria Very Poor: 1-2 Poor: 3-4 Satisfactory: 5-6 Good: 7-8 Excellent: 9-10
verbal and non-
verbal
Ability to
communicate
effectively with
Sponsors and/or
donator, Volunteer
Organization. Week to
communicate effectively with Ability to communicate communicate effectively with
Consistency in follow effectively with Sponsors
effectively with Sponsors and/or effectively with Sponsors Sponsors and/or donator,
up and/or donator,
Sponsors and/or donator, Volunteer and/or donator, Volunteer Organization.
Evidence starts of Volunteer Organization.
donator, Volunteer Organization. Volunteer Organization. Consistency follow up and
week 5, week Consistency follow up
Organization. Last minute follow up Consistency follow up outstanding
before, during and
To late follow up
after the program.
Update progress to
Lecturer
Meeting Minute,
post-mortem (with
evidences- recording
link, photos)
AFTER
An assessment is carried out
right after the programme is
conducted.
The participants exhibit the
expected changes based on
the objectives of the
programme such as change of
attitude or increment of
knowledge / skills / aspirations
Assessment Criteria
PO
Assessment Criteria Very Poor: 1-2 Poor: 3-4 Satisfactory: 5-6 Good: 7-8 Excellent: 9-10
knowledge, attitude and skill?
PO7 J Materials SDG: The impact and The impact and The impact and The impact and The impact and sustainability
WK7 Sustainability Value For The sustainability of sustainability of CSR sustainability of CSR sustainability of CSR of CSR project on the society
WP1, Community CSR project on the project on the society project on the society is project on the society is is well demonstrated with
WP4 Material for public society is not is listed without discuss discuss strong engagement with
Assessment Criteria
PO
Assessment Criteria Very Poor: 1-2 Poor: 3-4 Satisfactory: 5-6 Good: 7-8 Excellent: 9-10
awareness, ddemonstrate
the implication of the
project in relation of SDG comprehensive comprehensively and
included. comprehensively. SDG
discussion related to SDG.
Refer to Poster & Video
Guideline
PO7 K Promote SDG: Sustainability Some level of Awareness and Acceptable awareness Creative and Inspired Creative and Inspired
WK7 Value For The Community awareness and promotion available and promotion with method of awareness method of awareness and
WP1, Promote demonstrate the promotion but weak with traditional limited assess by society and promotion through promotion through wide
implication of the project distribution method method- hardcopy, wide coverage medium coverage medium and
WP4
in relation of SDG fliers etc. -more than 30 no of - More than 50 of likes/ evident the program attracts
-Less than 10 no of -less than 30 no of likes/ share/views. share/views. the society
Share the final program to likes/ share/views. likes/ share/views. -Share the link to Share the link to - More than 100 no of likes/
society -Share the link to -Share the link to everyone but some level everyone easy to open share/views.
selected group but selected group but to open the hyper link the hyper link Share the link to everyone
Come out with innovative
cannot open the some level to open the and easy to open the hyper
and creative idea how to
hyper link hyper link link
communicate and inspire
other people and the
society at large to
understand and raise the
awareness about the
CSR with support SDG.
Examples through social
media – YouTube, face
book, Twitter, Instagram
etc. Share the link and
print screen the evident.
Target at least 30 no of
likes/ share/views- (each
member)
Media coverage /
Publication in the form
of: Newspaper articles,
Magazine, Media links /
blogs / Web page /
Facebook, Brochures /
pamphlet
Assessment Criteria
PO
Assessment Criteria Very Poor: 1-2 Poor: 3-4 Satisfactory: 5-6 Good: 7-8 Excellent: 9-10