Original Article

Global Advances in Health and Medicine

Volume 8: 1–11
Prenatal Yoga for Back Pain, Balance, ! The Author(s) 2019
Article reuse guidelines:
and Maternal Wellness: A Randomized, sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/2164956119870984
Controlled Pilot Study journals.sagepub.com/home/gam

Selma C Holden, MD, MPH1 , Brad Manor, PhD2,

Junhong Zhou, PhD2, Chloe Zera, MD3, Roger B Davis, ScD3, and
Gloria Y Yeh, MD, MPH3

Abstract
Background: The objective was to assess the feasibility of a prenatal yoga randomized controlled trial (RCT) for gestational
low back pain (LBP), mobility, and maternal well-being.
Methods: In this pilot, women aged 18 to 39 years with uncomplicated pregnancies at 12 to 26 weeks were randomized,
stratified by presence of LBP, to attend a weekly yoga class or a time-matched educational support group for 12 weeks.
Sample size was based on anticipated enrollment of 2 subjects per month. Primary outcomes were measures of feasibility
and acceptability. Secondary outcomes included LBP disability, pregnancy symptom burden, childbirth self-efficacy, instru-
mented gait, balance, and falls at baseline, every 4 weeks, and 6 weeks postpartum.
Results: From April 2015 to December 2015, 168 women were contacted and 115 (68%) were eligible. Twenty women
enrolled (N ¼ 11 yoga; N ¼ 9 control; mean gestational age 20.2 weeks). Retention at 12 weeks was 81% in yoga and 77% in
control. There were no yoga-related adverse events. Exploratory analyses show no differences in back pain disability
between groups. Significant groups effects were found on biomechanical assessments, including percentage change in gait
speed (F ¼ 4.4, P ¼ .04), double support time (F ¼ 23.6, P <.01), instrumented timed-up-and-go (F ¼ 8.6, P <.01), and turn
time (F ¼ 5.7, P ¼.02) suggesting clinically relevant improvements with yoga. Pregnancy Symptom Inventory (PSI) scores
improved (13.1 point difference, 95% confidence interval, 5.1–21.1) at 12 weeks in yoga compared to control, adjusted for
baseline gestational age.
Conclusion: Conducting an RCT of prenatal yoga to improve gestational LBP and maternal well-being is feasible and
safe. While no differences in back pain were observed, biomechanical measures were sensitive assessments for evaluating
gestational LBP-related mobility impairment and showed group differences. Additionally, the PSI showed significant
differences in symptom burden over 12 weeks, supporting the ongoing claims that yoga improves a pregnant woman’s
overall well-being.

Keywords
yoga, pregnancy, falls, symptom burden, well-being
Received March 4, 2019; Revised received July 1, 2019. Accepted for publication July 18, 2019

Introduction
1
Pregnancy-related back pain is a significant health prob- Department of Primary Care, University of New England College of
Osteopathic Medicine, Biddeford, Maine
lem affecting a large majority of women in the world.1 2
Mobility and Falls Translational Research Center, Hebrew Senior Life,
Gestational low back pain (LBP) is likely caused by phys- Roslindale, Massachusetts
3
iologic changes during pregnancy, including maternal Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical
weight gain, spinal lordosis, decreased abdominal Center, Boston, Massachusetts
muscle strength, changed center of mass, and relaxin- Corresponding Author:
Selma C Holden, Department of Primary Care, University of New England
mediated joint laxity.2–4 These increase shear forces College of Osteopathic Medicine, 11 Hills Beach Road, Biddeford, ME
across the joints of the lower back and pelvis, increasing 04005, USA.
the risk of LBP and falls during pregnancy.5 Email: sholden1@une.edu

Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-
NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and dis-
tribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.
sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
2 Global Advances in Health and Medicine
In observational cohort studies, gestational LBP is asso-
ciated with insomnia, impaired daily activity, loss of
work, depression, pain medication use, and chronic recur-
rent back pain.6–9 Some of these effects extend through
childbirth and into motherhood.10 Despite the high inci-
dence of gestational LBP and the associated morbidity,
treatments are limited and often not offered.11
As pregnancy progresses, the risk of falling increases
with estimated rates of falls being 27%, similar to the
rate of women who are older than 70 years.12 Physical
activity is a promising intervention for preventing
falls and gestational LBP that may be associated with
additional benefits including self-confidence and overall
self-efficacy.13–15
Overarching the spectrum of gestational morbidity
are psychosocial factors that independently impact
maternal–fetal outcomes. Pregnancy-related depression
and stress are associated with prematurity,16,17 low
birth rate,18,19 and postpartum depression. Efforts to
improve individual psychosocial factors include exer-
cise,14 mind–body interventions,20 and group visits21
using validated pregnancy-specific scales, which measure
elements of maternal well-being such as depression, anx-
iety, and childbirth self-efficacy.
Yoga is a novel multimodal intervention that incor-
porates physical exercises such as stretching, core
strengthening, and balance training, with the cultivation
of mindfulness, acceptance, and self-compassion.
International reviews suggest prenatal yoga’s benefit
for LBP, stress, quality of life, depression, anxiety,
labor pain, and delivery duration.22–27 In the United
States, an estimated 13% of pregnant women practice
yoga.28 However, rigorous prospective feasibility, safety,
and efficacy data are limited. In the nonpregnant patient
population, U.S. studies suggest that yoga is an effective
intervention for back pain and overall well-being.29
Yoga may also improve gait, postural stability, and
flexibility.30
We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial
(RCT) to primarily assess feasibility, safety, and accept-
ability of a 12-week prenatal yoga intervention in patients
from an urban academic medical center in the United
States. Secondarily, we sought to preliminarily assess
the effect of yoga on pain-related disability, maternal
well-being, and biomechanical measures in order to esti-
mate measures that may be sensitive to change and var-
iability over time to inform the design of future trials.
Materials and Methods
This study was a prospective, randomized controlled pilot
clinical trial of women aged 18 to 39 years with uncompli-
cated pregnancies that was funded by the externally
reviewed Osher Pilot Research Award. Subjects were
recruited from the Obstetrics and Gynecology clinic at
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) during
April 2015 to December 2015. We included pregnant
women between 12 and 26 weeks of gestation with and
without back pain who had no regular yoga practice. We
excluded those who had significant back pathology (eg,
spinal stenosis, fracture history, pain that required prescrip-
tion medications), attended more than 10 yoga classes
within the previous 3 months, had pregnancy complications
(eg, uncontrolled hypertension, uncontrolled diabetes, pla-
centa previa, twin gestations, advanced maternal age), or
were non-English speakers. BIDMC’s human subjects
review board approved the study. All participants provided
written informed consent for participation in the study.
Subjects were randomized (1:1) to a prenatal yoga
program or an educational attention control immediate-
ly following consent and the baseline interview using a
computer-generated random numbers. Randomization
was stratified by presence of back pain and enrollment
was done on a rolling basis.
Subjects assigned to the intervention attended a
weekly, 1-hour prenatal yoga class. To isolate the
impact of yoga from that of group support, those
assigned to the control group attended a weekly educa-
tional support group. Classes were offered at 3 different
times during the week. Subjects assigned to either yoga
or control group were expected to attend their respective
intervention once per week for at least 12 weeks. Those in
the yoga arm were allowed and encouraged to continue
attending through the end of their pregnancy.
Intervention Development
The yoga intervention (Appendix 1) was developed
through a modified Delphi process, including individual
consultations and group discussion with an expert con-
sensus panel of prenatal yoga teachers, mind–body
experts and researchers, and clinicians with specialized
training in obstetrical care and midwifery. The goals of
the intervention explicitly included (1) the intention to be
gentle with oneself; (2) the traditional elements of a com-
prehensive yoga class: relaxation, breathing exercises,
mindfulness, and active poses; and (3) select poses,
which could prevent or attenuate back pain and improve
balance. For variety and to include multiple recom-
mended poses, 2 classes that had similar overall struc-
tures, but different specific asanas were taught on
alternating weeks. The pranayama practices included in
this intervention were 2-part yogic breathing and alter-
nate nostril breathing. Asanas included were child’s
pose, table pose, cat/cow, downward dog, mountain,
chair, goddess, triangle, warrior 2, and bound angle.
Two certified prenatal yoga teachers each with at least
4 years of yoga teaching experience were trained by the
principal investigator in the study-specific class. Classes
were offered in a yoga studio within walking distance
Holden et al.
from BIDMC. Daily home practice was encouraged and
facilitated with an illustrated manual. Participants were
also supplied with a yoga mat and block.
Control Group
Control subjects attended a 12-week educational support
group led by an experienced health-care group facilitator
from the local community who was trained by the
study’s staff. A 12-subject curriculum was developed
based on publicly available patient educational materials
offered by the American College of Obstetricians and
Gynecologists (ACOG)31 and the American College of
Nurse-Midwives (ACNM).32 The curriculum included
the following pregnancy-related topics: self-care, nutri-
tion, weight gain, exercise, vaccines, medications, screen-
ing tests, common symptoms, postpartum preparations,
labor, breast feeding, and birth control. No exercises,
meditation, or mindfulness practices were incorporated
into the control group’s educational curriculum.
Participants in both intervention and control groups
received written materials based on the extracted
ACOG and ACNM curriculum.
Assessments
Feasibility, acceptability, and safety. We tracked rate of
recruitment into the study, including how many were
screened, those who were interested, those who
enrolled, and average number enrolled per month.
Intervention and control group acceptability was
assessed through attendance at classes and through a
semistructured, postpartum qualitative exit interview.
Overall study adherence was assessed through compli-
ance with the assessment protocol (number of study
visits completed). We systematically tracked adverse
events at each weekly class and at each monthly
study visit. Additionally, chart reviews of routine pre-
natal visits were conducted at monthly study visits to
identify any unreported events.
Clinical symptoms and psychosocial outcomes. The primary
outcome of interest was back pain-related disability
as measured by the Roland Morris Disability
Questionnaire (RMDQ).33 Secondary outcomes includ-
ed a visual analogue scale that measured back
pain severity (0 ¼ no pain, 10 ¼ worst pain ever). The
41-item Pregnancy Symptom Inventory (PSI) tracked
overall functional burden and common symptoms such
as urinary symptoms, fatigue, dizziness, sleep distur-
bance, leg, and back pain.34 The Edinburgh Postnatal
Depression Scale (EDPS), which is also validated for
prenatal depression screening,35 was used to asses
depression. Quality of life was tracked with the Short
Form 12 questionnaire (SF12).36 The stress subscale of
the prenatal psychosocial profile was used to track
3
pregnancy-related stress.37 The Childbirth Self Efficacy
Inventory38 was used to quantify maternal confidence
toward childbirth.
Postnatal outcomes. Maternal satisfaction with labor and
childbirth was measured with the Childbirth Experience
Questionnaire.39 Routine perinatal obstetrical measure-
ment such as gestational age, weight gain, and pregnan-
cy complications were tracked as well as common
postnatal outcomes (ie, gestational age at birth,
method of delivery, anesthesia use, duration of labor,
birth weight, APGARs, and breastfeeding).
Mobility and biomechanics. Mobility was assessed through
a series of tests conducted with the ADPM Mobility Lab
System. While wearing wireless 3-dimensional biosen-
sors strapped around their wrists, ankles, sternum and
lower back, subjects completed 2 rounds of 3 mobility
tests: the instrumented timed-up-and-go test (iTUG), a
30-second standing sway test (iSway), and a 90-second
walk test (iWalk). The iTUG consists of standing from a
chair, walking to a cone placed 7 m in front of the chair,
turning, returning to the chair, and resuming a seated
position. The iSway consists of standing still for
30 seconds. The iWalk consists of walking continuously
for 90 seconds. From these tests, results of 2 trials were
averaged to obtain individual measures of gait speed,
double support time (proportion of time during iWalk
spent with both feet on the ground), total iTUG time,
and the amount of time to complete a turn. Fear of
falling was assessed through the Falls Efficacy Scale
International.40
Testing visits for both groups, which included surveys
and mobility testing, occurred at baseline, then every
4 weeks until delivery. A final study visit that included
a semistructured qualitative exit interview occurred at
6-week postpartum. All visits were conducted at
BIDMC’s Clinical Research Center. For subject conve-
nience, study visits were scheduled to coincide with the
subject’s routine pre- and postnatal visits when possible.
Subjects received $25 for each study-testing visit.
Statistical Analysis
For feasibility measures, we used descriptive statistics to
assess the overall recruitment rate, attendance at classes,
and study adherence. Our goals were to achieve >70%
attendance in both yoga intervention and education con-
trol groups as well as retain >70% of subjects at com-
pletion of the 12-week assessment. Our sample size was
determined based on practical considerations and antic-
ipated enrollment rate of about 2 subjects per month
over 9 months of enrollment. Analyses were performed
on an intention-to-treat basis.
4 Global Advances in Health and Medicine
For the patient-reported outcomes, a linear mixed
effects model with an autoregressive correlation structure
was used to calculate the difference between groups in
average change scores from baseline as well as differences
in the percentage change from baseline scores. A repeated
measures analysis that assumed a linear effect was con-
ducted using weeks of intervention as a categorical vari-
able and adjusted for the subject’s gestational age. The
estimated effects of between-group differences were calcu-
lated at 8 and 12 weeks of intervention to further inform
selection of outcomes that are potentially sensitive to
yoga in this population. Change in back pain-related dis-
ability (RMDQ) was defined, a priori, as the clinical out-
come measure of primary interest.
For the biomechanical outcomes, we calculated the per-
centage change of sway speed and area, gait speed, double
support time, iTUG time, and turn time from baseline to
Figure 1. CONSORT Flow Diagram.
each subsequent visit. The effects of group, follow-up visit,
and their interaction on each outcome were calculated
using repeated measures analysis of covariance models
adjusted for the gestational age and body mass.
The continuous postnatal measures were compared
using a 2-tailed Student’s t test. The categorical
postnatal measurements were compared using a
Fisher’s Exact test.
Results
Feasibility and Acceptability
Of the 681 screened subjects, 168 subjects were contacted
and 115 (68%) were interested and eligible. Among those
interested and eligible, the most common reason for not
enrolling was class scheduling (73%). Twenty subjects
Holden et al. 5

(17.3%) were willing to be randomized and able to Safety

commit to the available class times. Subject recruitment
No adverse events occurred during the yoga classes or
rate was 2.2 subjects per month during the 9 months of
educational support groups. In the yoga group, there
active recruitment. Figure 1 shows the CONSORT flow
was a case of maternal thrombocytopenia and placental
diagram for recruitment and randomization, 11 to yoga
abruption during labor. In the educational control
and 9 to educational support.
group, there was a case of cholestasis with elevated
Average class attendance rates were 74% in the yoga
liver enzymes, one subject with kidney stones, and one
group and 90% in the control group. Subject retention
with shoulder dystocia. None of these routine complica-
rates at the completion of the 12-week intervention were
tions of pregnancy or childbirth were directly related to
81% in the yoga group and 77% in the control group.
the yoga classes, educational support group meetings, or
We were only able to assess 14 (70%) at the postpartum
the data collection.
visit and one did not have a qualitative exit interview.
Patients in the yoga (N ¼ 7) and control (N ¼ 6) groups
both reported positive feedback for their respective
Exploratory Analyses
study interventions. All in the yoga group would recom- Table 1 presents the baseline characteristics of the 20
mend yoga to a pregnant friend. subjects who were enrolled. Mean gestational age was
Intervention fidelity was excellent. There were no 20.2 weeks, and average maternal age was 31.4 years.
issues identified with respect to instructors deviating Treatment groups were similar in race, insurance
from the stated protocol. status, recorded health conditions, gravidity, and

Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of Participants.

Mean  SD or Number (%)

Total Yoga Education

n ¼ 20 n ¼ 11 n¼9 P

Sociodemographics
Average age 31.4  4.7 29.6  5.1 33.4  3.5 .07
Race .37
White 13 (65) 6 (55) 7 (77)
Black 2 (10) 2 (18) 0
Hispanic 3(15) 1 (11) 2 (22)
Other 2 (10) 2 (18) 0
Insurance .64
Private 14 (70) 7 (64) 7 (78)
Public/Government 4 (20) 3 (28) 1 (14)
Other 2 (10) 1 (11) 1 (14)
Clinical factors
Comorbidities .64
Anxiety 1 (5) 1 (11) 0
Asthma 1 (5) 1 (11) 0
Autoimmune conditions 1 (5) 1 (11) 1 (14)
Depression 2 (10) 1 (11) 1 (14)
Hypertension 0 0 0
Cardiac disease 0 0 0
Seizure disorders 0 0 0
Psychiatric conditions 0 0 0
Obstetrical
Gravidity average 2  1.3 1.73  0.8 2.33  1.7 .29
Parity average 0.5  0.7 0.55  0.7 0.44  0.7 .75
Gestational age average weeks 19.8  4.4 20.8  4.5 18.6  4.2 .26
Current low back pain? 1
No, not at all 7 (35) 4 (36) 3 (33)
Rarely, some or most of the time 13 (65) 7 (64) 6 (66)
Average RMDQ score 2.5 3.2 1.9 .5
Abbreviations: RMDQ, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire; SD, standard deviation.
6 Global Advances in Health and Medicine

parity, although those in the education group tended to Clinical Symptoms and Psychosocial Measures
be older. Groups were also similar in back pain history
The effect estimates of the between-group differences
and current back pain symptoms. The baseline preva-
for the patient-reported symptoms and psychosocial
lence of back pain for all the subjects was 65%, with a
measures are shown in Table 2. After adjusting for
mean RMDQ score of 2.5 (range 0–14).
baseline gestational age, women randomized to the pre-
natal yoga class reported a greater improvement in the
Table 2. Effect Estimates of Between-Group Differences at PSI at 8 and 12 weeks of intervention compared to con-
8 and 12 Weeks. trol (change of 9 points, 95% confidence interval [CI],
0–17.0, P < .03 and 13.1 points, 95% CI, 5.1–21.1,
Effect at 8 weeks Effect at 12 weeks
P < .0025, respectively). No other significant differences
Estimate SE P > |t| Estimate SE P > |t| were noted in the reported symptoms or psychoso-
cial measures.
Physical
RMDQ 0.004 1.98 0.99 0.82 1.98 0.68
Back pain VAS 1.4 1 0.19 0.77 1 0.46 Mobility Measures
PSI 9.0 4.0 0.03 13.1 4.1 0.0025 After adjusting for gestational age and body mass, there
Psychosocial
was a significant longitudinal difference between groups
Depression 0.3 1.3 0.83 2.3 1.3 0.07
in the percentage change in mobility from baseline
PPP 1.5 0.93 0.12 0.19 0.93 0.84
SF12-physical 1 4.2 0.81 1.5 4.24 0.72 through 4-, 6-, 8-, and 12-week postnatal visits (Figure
SF12-mental 0.9 3.6 0.81 2.65 3.6 0.47 2). Specifically, there was a higher percentage increase in
CBSE 8.0 8.7 0.37 10.7 8.9 0.23 gait speed in the yoga group compared to the control
group (main effect of group, F ¼ 4.4, P ¼ .04). Main
Abbreviations: CBSE, Childbirth Self Efficacy Scale; PPP, Prenatal
Psychosocial Profile; PSI, Pregnancy Symptom Inventory; RMDQ, Roland
effects of group were also for the percentage change of
Morris Disability Questionnaire due to back pain; SE, standard error; SF12, double support time (F ¼ 23.6, P < .0001), iTUG com-
Short Form 12; VAS, Visual Analogue Scale. pletion time (F ¼ 8.6, P < .001), and 180 turn time

Figure 2. Gait Analyses. TUG, timed-up-and-go.

Holden et al. 7

(F ¼ 5.7, P ¼ .02). For each of these outcomes, percent- Discussion

age changes were higher (reflecting worse performance)
in the control group as compared to the yoga group. No
effects of visit, or group by visit interactions, were
observed for any outcome. Both groups increased their
fear of falling, while no difference was found between
groups (P ¼ .5, standard error ¼ 1.5).
Postnatal Outcomes
At birth, no differences were found in average gesta-
tional age, maternal weight gain and the time spent in
the first stage of labor. However, a clinically signifi-
cant lower amount of time was spent in the second
stage of labor for the women who participated in the
yoga intervention (95% CI, 19.0–179.2, P ¼ .01). When
asked about their childbirth experience, the yoga par-
ticipants felt more confident in their own capacity
(95% CI, 1.2–9.6, P ¼ .01) and perceived a greater
sense of safety (95% CI, 0.3–4.8, P ¼ .01). This is
shown in Table 3.
Table 3. Postnatal Outcomes.
Main Findings
This pilot RCT of prenatal yoga for gestational LBP
and maternal well-being is feasible, safe, and acceptable.
We successfully developed, implemented, and tested a
tailored, gentle prenatal yoga program to target back
health in pregnancy. The relatively high rates of class
attendance, overall subject retention, and qualitative
feedback in both groups favorably support study accept-
ability. Specifically for the yoga intervention, the
majority of subjects found the program helpful or very
helpful and would recommend the program to a preg-
nant friend.
While there was no detected difference in back pain
disability as measured by the RMDQ, our exploratory
analyses detected clinical differences between the groups
in several other measures. A lower burden of overall
pregnancy symptoms was found as well as a trend
toward improvement in depression scores in the yoga
group compared to education. There were also impor-
tant and provocative biomechanical improvements seen
with yoga including gait speed, double support time, and
iTUG time.

All Yoga Education Strengths and Limitations

n ¼ 20 n ¼ 11 n¼9 P
As a small, pilot trial, this study has several limitations.
Average gestational age (weeks) 39.5 39.9 39.1 .20 Recruited subjects were mostly white and had private
Average weight gain (pounds) 21.6 23.5 19.6 .34 insurance, limiting the generalizability of our findings.
Type of delivery 1 There was some imbalance, although not significant, in
Spontaneous vaginal 15 8 7 mean maternal age at baseline that may have affected
Scheduled C-section 3 2 1
results. By necessity, participants were unblinded to
Urgent/emergent C-section 2 1 1
Anesthesia used .19 treatment assignment, thereby possibly increasing the
None/natural 1 0 1 therapeutic influence of expectation. Also, due to limited
Spinal/epidural 18 11 7 resources, the research staff members conducting the
General 1 1 0 testing visits were not always blinded to the subject’s
Average labor times (min) randomization assignment. Despite the limitations of a
Stage 1 516.9 515.0 518.7 .99 small pilot, this study provides valuable information
Stage 2 87.2 37.5 136.8 .01 regarding the feasibility and safety of studying prenatal
Stage 3 7.4 5.3 9.6 .21
yoga for pregnancy-related back pain, mobility, and
Birth weight (g) 3412 3273 3550 .11
Average Apgar scores overall well-being. Importantly, it is the first study to
1 min 7.2 7.7 6.6 .21 show changes in sensitive measures of biomechanical
5 min 8.7 8.9 8.5 .40 measures and gait with yoga, which may be protective
Feeding 1 in pregnancy. Future investigations could consider
Exclusively breast milk 11 6 5 active controls such as physical therapy and a longer
Some breast and formula 8 4 4 term follow-up.
Exclusively formula 1 1 0
Childbirth Experience Questionnaire
Own capacity 20.9 23.6 18.2 .01 Interpretation
Professional support 20.7 17.8 17.8 .90 While our recruitment rate was greater than anticipated,
Perceived safety 19.1 20.4 18.0 .01 many potential participants could not attend due to the
Participation 14.6 8.9 8.2 .68
limited availability of classes. Offering a greater flexibil-
ity in class times or utilizing technologies that promote
8 Global Advances in Health and Medicine
home practice could improve accessibility for a larger
study with this population.
We note that perhaps the RMDQ was not a
straightforward measure of gestational LBP.
Questions such as “Because of your back pain, do
you have difficulty sleeping at night?” were often met
with confusion, as subjects routinely stated their dis-
abilities were due to being pregnant in general. Even
if they had back pain, simply being pregnant was the
more common reason why the participants needed a
railing to get upstairs or had more difficulty putting
on their stockings. Future investigations may consider
alternative instruments such as the Pregnancy Mobility
Index, a validated self-report questionnaire developed
by Van de Pol that has been used with pregnant
women to evaluate mobility and quality of life in rela-
tion to LBP.41
Our findings of an improvement in overall burden of
pregnancy-related symptoms, as measured by the PSI,
suggest that prenatal yoga may impact the general well-
ness of expecting mothers and that the PSI is sensitive to
change with yoga. This finding and the trend toward
improvement in the depression scale (EDPS) parallel
the literature on yoga in the general and pregnant pop-
ulations in helping mood, anxiety, depression, and qual-
ity of life.22,42
The changes in biomechanics during pregnancy has
been described by Branco et al.43 and suggest that
decreases in gait speed and increases in double support
time in a pregnant woman’s stride are mechanisms to
help avoid falls as center of gravity dramatically shifts
during pregnancy. These changes may also be involved
in back pain-related kinesiophobia. To our knowledge,
our study is the first report of an intervention that may
favorably alter the trajectory of this change. The
improvements seen in the yoga group, including
improvements in iTUG time and turn time, suggest
that women were more confident with walking and per-
haps less likely to fall. Since some reports suggest falls
are the second leading cause of emergency room visits
and the reason for up to 30% of all hospital admissions
during pregnancy,12,44 future studies could evaluate the
potential cost savings if yoga was offered to a larger
pregnant population.
While both groups of women had similar gestation-
al ages at birth, total birth times, APGAR scores, and
birth weights, the difference in the second stage of
labor time suggests that the woman in the yoga
group spent less time in the active pushing stage of
childbirth. Jahdi et al. reported similar outcomes in a
prenatal yoga trial conducted in Iran.45 One possible
explanation for this difference is that Kegel exercises
were specifically included in the asanas of the prenatal
yoga class, which may have contributed to a more
efficient labor. The improved feeling of one’s own
capacity and perceived sense of safety in the yoga
groups also reflect a mother’s overall confidence and
well-being. One of the often cited and possible mech-
anisms of mindfulness practices inherent in yoga may
be an increase in self-efficacy and decrease in emotion-
al reactivity.
We did not find any safety issues with our yoga
approach, as participants were encouraged to listen to
their bodies, modify poses as needed, and be gentle with
oneself. When our trial initially began, yoga was not yet
a recommended exercise activity during pregnancy per
the ACOG guidelines.46 Since completion of the trial,
ACOG updated the practice guidelines, which now
include yoga as a recommended general exercise during
pregnancy.47 One caution is that this study did not spe-
cifically investigate “hot yoga” classes, where a vigorous
series of postures are practiced in studios where the tem-
perature is turned to temperatures over 90 F. Since heat-
inducing environments such as hot tubs and spas are
associated with adverse birth outcomes,48 no inferences
about the safety of vigorous hot yoga styles can be made
with this study’s results. Even though Polis et al.
reported the relative safety of 26 different common
yoga postures on acute maternal and fetal physiological
outcomes,49 a theoretical risk of injury during yoga prac-
tice still exists.50 We therefore strongly emphasize that
participants should have access to trained, experienced
instructors who understand the importance of a gentle,
modified approach.
Conclusion
Based on the observed recruitment, adherence, and
acceptability, a prenatal yoga intervention to improve
gestational LBP and maternal well-being appears fea-
sible and safe. In preliminary analyses, our ability to
detect clinically and statistically significant differences
between groups in several measures informs the design
and outcome selection of future yoga trials in this
population. This analysis supports the possible benefit
of prenatal yoga in reducing the overall symptom
burden of pregnancy and improving the stability of a
pregnant woman’s stride. Further study of prenatal
yoga utilizing a larger adequately powered RCT
is warranted.
Précis
A pilot prenatal yoga randomized controlled trial is fea-
sible, safe, and may improve maternal mobility and
well-being.
Holden et al. 9

Appendix 1: Prenatal Yoga Class Schedule

Week A Week B Minutes

Sitting (Sukhasana) and centering with Dirga Pranayama 0–15

Body scan Intention setting
Ohm, welcome, check-in, weekly topic introduction

Table (Goasana) 15–25

Child’s pose (Balasana)
Cat inhale/exhale (Marjaryasana/Bitilasana)
Hip circles (with Goasana)
Bird dog (Dandayamna Bharmanasana) Arm circles (with Goasana)
Downward dog (Adho Mukha Svanasana) Thread the needle (Parsva Balasana)
Tip toe mountain (Tadasana) Downward dog (Adho Mukha Svanasana)

Modified sun salutations (Surya Namaskara) 25–35

Chair (Utkatasana) Warrior 2 (Virabhadrasana II)
Goddess (Utkata Konasana) Triangle (Trikonasana)
Wide forward bend (Upavistha Konasana) 1/2 moon (Ardha Chandrasana)

Squat with kegel (Malasana) Half straddle (Janu Sirsasana) 35–45

1 leg forward bend (Janu Sirsasana) Bound angle (Baddha Konasana)

Savasana with guided progressive relaxation 45–60

Pranayama (Nadi Shodhana or Dirga)
Body scan Intention meditation
Ohm-mantra

Acknowledgments Brigham and Women’s Hospital and the National Center of

The authors are grateful for all the patients, providers, research-
staff and yoga teachers involved in this study, in particular,
Frankye Riley, Janine Duffy, Miranda Gerzon, and Lea White.
Authors’ Contribution
SCH, CZ, and GYY contributed to the development of inter-
ventions. SCH secured funding and led the project implemen-
tation with GYY’s guidance. RBD assisted with the statistical
analysis. BM and JZ assisted with the biomechanical assess-
ments and analysis. All authors have contributed to, reviewed,
and approved final draft.
Ethics Approval
The study was approved by Beth Israel Deaconess Medical
Center’s human subjects review board (February 2015 IRB
Protocol# 2014P000344).
Complementary and Integrative Health. Dr Holden was sup-
ported by T32AT AT000051; principal investigator: Yeh.
Dr Yeh was supported by K24AT009465. This work was con-
ducted with partial support from Harvard Catalyst|The
Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (National
Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National
Institutes of Health Award UL1 TR001102) and financial con-
tributions from Harvard University and its affiliated academic
health-care centers. The content is solely the responsibility of the
authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of
Harvard Catalyst, Harvard University and its affiliated academ-
ic health-care centers, or the National Institutes of Health.
ORCID iD
Selma C Holden https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2626-0455

Declaration of Conflicting Interests References

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with
respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of
this article.
Funding
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support
for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article:
This study was primarily supported by the Osher Center at
1. Gutke A, Boissonnault J, Brook G, Stuge B. The severity
and impact of pelvic girdle pain and low-back pain in preg-
nancy: a multinational study. J Women Health.
2017;27(4):510–517.
2. MacLennan AH, Nicolson R, Green RC, Bath M. Serum
relaxin and pelvic pain of pregnancy. Lancet.
1986;328(8501):243–245.
3. Sabino J, Grauer JN. Pregnancy and low back pain. Curr
Rev Musculoskel Med. 2008;1(2):137–141.
10
4. Cakmak B, Inanir A, Nacar MC, Filiz B. The effect of
maternity support belts on postural balance in pregnancy.
PM R. 2014;6(7):624–628.
5. McCrory JL, Chambers AJ, Daftary A, Redfern MS.
Dynamic postural stability during advancing pregnancy.
J Biomech. 2010;43(12):2434–2439.
6. Wang SM, Dezinno P, Maranets I, Berman MR, Caldwell-
Andrews AA, Kain ZN. Low back pain during pregnancy:
prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes. Obstet Gynecol.
2004;104(1):65–70.
7. Virgara R, Maher C, Van Kessel G. The comorbidity of
low back pelvic pain and risk of depression and anxiety in
pregnancy in primiparous women. BMC Pregnancy
Childbirth. 2018;18(1):288.
8. Bergstrom C, Persson M, Mogren I. Pregnancy-related low
back pain and pelvic girdle pain approximately 14 months
after pregnancy—pain status, self-rated health and family
situation. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:48.
9. Mackenzie J, Murray E, Lusher J. Women’s experiences of
pregnancy related pelvic girdle pain: a systematic review.
Midwifery. 2018;56:102–111.
10. Mogren IM. BMI, pain and hyper-mobility are determi-
nants of long-term outcome for women with low back
pain and pelvic pain during pregnancy. Eur Spine J.
2006;15(7):1093–1102.
11. Skaggs CD, Prather H, Gross G, George JW, Thompson
PA, Nelson DM. Back and pelvic pain in an
underserved United States pregnant population: a prelim-
inary descriptive survey. J Manipulative Physiol Ther.
2007;30(2):130–134.
12. Dunning K, Lemasters G, Bhattacharya A. A major public
health issue: the high incidence of falls during pregnancy.
Matern Child Health J. 2010;14(5):720–725.
13. Liddle SD, Pennick V. Interventions for preventing and
treating low-back and pelvic pain during pregnancy.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(9):CD001139.
14. Field T. Prenatal exercise research. Infant Behav Dev.
2012;35(3):397–407.
15. Brewin D, Nannini A. Women’s perspectives on falls and
fall prevention during pregnancy. MCN Am J Matern/
Child Nurs. 2014;35(5):300–305.
16. Dole N, Savitz DA, Hertz-Picciotto I, Siega-Riz AM,
McMahon MJ, Buekens P. Maternal stress and preterm
birth. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157(1):14–24.
17. Li D, Liu L, Odouli R. Presence of depressive
symptoms during early pregnancy and the risk of preterm
delivery: a prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod.
2009;24(1):146–153.
18. Grote NK, Bridge JA, Gavin AR, Melville JL, Iyengar S,
Katon WJ. A meta-analysis of depression during pregnan-
cy and the risk of preterm birth, low birth weight, and
intrauterine growth restriction. Arch Gen Psychiatry.
2010;67(10):1012–1024.
19. Zhu P, Tao F, Hao J, Sun Y, Jiang X. Prenatal life events
stress: implications for preterm birth and infant birth-
weight. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(1):34 e31–38.
20. Beddoe AE, Lee KA. Mind-body interventions
during pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs.
2008;37(2):165–175.
Global Advances in Health and Medicine
21. Ickovics JR, Kershaw TS, Westdahl C, et al. Group pre-
natal care and perinatal outcomes: a randomized con-
trolled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(2 Pt 1):330–339.
22. Babbar S, Shyken J. Yoga in pregnancy. Clin Obstet
Gynecol. 2016;59(3):600–612.
23. Jiang Q, Wu Z, Zhou L, Dunlop J, Chen P. Effects of yoga
intervention during pregnancy: a review for current status.
Am J Perinatol. 2015;32(6):503–514.
24. Dhillon A, Sparkes E, Duarte RV. Mindfulness-based
interventions during pregnancy: a systematic review and
meta-analysis. Mindfulness. 2017;8(6):1421–1437.
25. Shi Z, MacBeth A. The effectiveness of mindfulness-based
interventions on maternal perinatal mental health outcomes:
a systematic review. Mindfulness. 2017;8(4):823–847.
26. Lever Taylor B, Cavanagh K, Strauss C. The effectiveness
of mindfulness-based interventions in the perinatal period:
a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One.
2016;11(5):e0155720.
27. Kinser PA, Pauli J, Jallo N, et al. Physical activity and
yoga-based approaches for pregnancy-related low back
and pelvic pain. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs.
2017;46(3):334–346.
28. Holden SC, Gardiner P, Birdee G, Davis RB, Yeh GY.
Complementary and alternative medicine use among
women during pregnancy and childbearing years. Birth.
2015;42(3):261–269.
29. Wieland LS, Skoetz N, Pilkington K, Vempati R,
D’Adamo CR, Berman BM. Yoga treatment for chronic
non-specific low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2017;1:CD010671.
30. Jeter PE, Nkodo AF, Moonaz SH, Dagnelie G. A system-
atic review of yoga for balance in a healthy population.
J Altern Complement Med. 2014;20(4):221–232.
31. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
Patient Education FAQs. http://www.acog.org/
Resources-And-Publications/Patient-Education-FAQs-
List. 2014.
32. Nurse-Midwives ACo. Share with women. http://www.mid
wife.org/Share-With-Women. Published 2014 Accessed
August 12, 2019.
33. Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of
back pain. Spine. 1983;8(2):141–144.
34. Foxcroft K, Callaway L, Byrne N, Webster J.
Development and validation of a pregnancy symptoms
inventory. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13(3):1–9.
35. Gibson J, McKenzie-McHarg K, Shakespeare J, Price J,
Gray R. A systematic review of studies validating
the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in antepartum
and postpartum women. Acta Psychiatr Scand.
2009;119(5):350–364.
36. Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller S. A 12-item short-form health
survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reli-
ability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34(3):220–233.
37. Curry M, Burton D, Fields J. The prenatal psychosocial
profile: a research and clinical tool. Res Nurs Health.
1998;21(3):211–219.
38. Lowe N. Maternal confidence for labor: development of
the childbirth self-efficacy inventory. Res Nurs Health.
1983;16:141–149.
Holden et al.
39. Dencker A, Taft C, Bergqvist L, Lilja H, Berg M.
Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ): development
and evaluation of a multidimensional instrument. BMC
Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10:81.
40. Yardley L, Beyer N, Hauer K, Kempen G, Piot-Ziegler C,
Todd C. Development and initial validation of the
Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I). Age Ageing.
2005;34(6):614–619.
41. van de Pol G, de Leeuw JR, van Brummen HJ, Bruinse
HW, Heintz AP, van der Vaart CH. The Pregnancy
Mobility Index: a mobility scale during and after pregnan-
cy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(7):786–791.
42. Jeter PE, Slutsky J, Singh N, Khalsa SB. Yoga as a ther-
apeutic intervention: a bibliometric analysis of published
research studies from 1967 to 2013. J Altern Complement
Med. 2015;21(10):586–592.
43. Branco M, Santos-Rocha R, Vieira F. Biomechanics of gait
during pregnancy. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:527940.
44. Kuo C, Jamieson DJ, McPheeters ML, Meikle SF, Posner
SF. Injury hospitalizations of pregnant women in the
United States, 2002. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(2):
161 e161–166.
11
45. Jahdi F, Sheikhan F, Haghani H, et al. Yoga during preg-
nancy: the effects on labor pain and delivery outcomes (a
randomized controlled trial). Complement Ther Clin
Pract. 2017;27:1–4.
46. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
ACOG committee opinion no. 267: exercise during
pregnancy and the postpartum period. Obstet Gynecol.
2002; 99(1):171.
47. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
ACOG committee opinion no. 650: physical activity and
exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period.
Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(6):135–142.
48. Chambers CD. Risks of hyperthermia associated with hot
tub or spa use by pregnant women. Birth Defects Res A
Clin Mol Teratol. 2006;76(8):569–573.
49. Polis RL, Gussman D, Kuo YH. Yoga in pregnancy: an
examination of maternal and fetal responses to 26 yoga
postures. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(6):1237–1241.
50. Swain TA, McGwin G. Yoga-related injuries in the United
States from 2001 to 2014. Orthop J Sports Med.
2016;4(11):2325967116671703.
 Pengaruh Kombinasi Yoga Prenatal dan Senam Hamil

PENGARUH KOMBINASI YOGA

PRENATAL DAN SENAM HAMIL
TERHADAP PERUBAHAN KADAR
KORTISOL DAN LAMA PERSALINAN
KALA I

Elok Sari Dewi1, Ari Suwondo2 , Sri Wahyuni3

akbidkertosono@yahoo.co.id

Abstrak

Latar belakang: Wanita hamil primigravida hampir semuanya mengalami kekhawatiran, kecemasan,
dan ketakutan baik selama hamil, saat menghadapi persalinan maupun setelah persalinan. Adaptasi
terhadap stres diatur oleh kapasitas hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) untuk mensekresikan
hormon seperti kortisol. Peningkatan kadar kortisol pada masa kehamilan merupakan indikator adanya
stress emosional. Hal ini mungkin akan berpengaruh terhadap lama persalinan. Yoga prenatal dan senam
hamil merupaka terapi untuk menurunkan tingkat stress pada ibu hamil.
Tujuan penelitian: Membuktikan pengaruh kombinasi yoga prenatal dan senam hamil terhadap
perubahan kadar kortisol dan lama persalinan kala I.
Metode penelitian: Metode penalitian quasy-experimental (experiment semu) rancangan
Non-Equivalen Group Desain. Populasi adalah ibu hamil trimester III di Kabupaten Nganjuk. Cara
pengambilan sampel dengan teknik purposive sampling penelitian ini dilakukan pada 26 responden yang
terdiri dari kelompok perlakuan dan kelompok kontrol. Analisis data dengan menggunakan uji beda sampel
berpasangan yang sebelumnya dilakukan uji normalitas.
Hasil penelitian: Ada perbedaan yang bermakna kadar kortisol sebelum dan sesudah intervensi pada
kelompok perlakuan Hasil uji Mann- Whitney diperoleh nilai signifikasi 0,010 lebih kecil dari 0,05. Terjadi
penurunan sebesar -209.67 ng/ml pada kelompok perlakuan dan -129.96 ng/ml pada kelompok kontrol.
Rerata lama persalinan pada kelompok perlakuan dan kelompok kontrol setelah dilakukan uji statistik
dengan uji Wilcoxon di peroleh nilai p = 0,003 lebih kecil dari 0,05, artinya ada pengaruh kombinasi yoga
prenatal dan senam hamil terhadap lama persalinan kala I.
Kesimpulan: Kombinasi yoga prenatal dan senam hamil terbukti lebih efektif dalam menurunkan
kadar kortisol pada ibu hamil dengan rerata lama persalinan lebih cepat.
Saran: Setiap ibu hamil trimester III disarankan melakukan latihan kombinasi yoga prenatal dan
senam hamil secara rutin

JURNAL ILMIAH BIDAN, VOL.I, NO.3, 2016 7

Pengaruh Kombinasi Yoga Prenatal dan Senam Hamil
Pendahuluan
Kehamilan merupakan salah satu tahap
kehidupan yang harus dipersiapkan oleh seorang
perempuan, dalam proses kehamilan terjadi
perubahan fisiologis dan psikologis karena adanya
peningkatan hormon estrogen dan progesteron.
Proses adaptasi untuk menghadapi perubahan ini
harus sudah disiapkan semenjak awal kehamilan.
Persiapan yang matang akan mempunyai peran
penting dalam kehamilan (Guyton, A.C., dan Hall,
J.E. 2008).
Bobak mengatakan kehamilan merupakan
suatu krisis maturitas yang dapat menimbulkan
stres, tetapi berharga karena wanita tersebut
menyiapkan diri untuk memberi perawatan
dan memiliki tanggungjawab yang lebih besar.
Untuk menjadi seorang ibu, seorang remaja harus
beradaptasi dari kebiasaan dirawat ibu menjadi
seorang ibu yang melakukan perawatan. Seorang
dewasa harus mengubah kehidupan rutin menjadi
suatu kehidupan yang tidak dapat diprediksi karena
merawat bayi. Perasaan cemas seringkali terjadi
selama masa kehamilan terutama pada ibu yang
labil jiwanya akan mencapai kondisi klimaks
pada saat persalinan. Rasa cemas dapat timbul
akibat kekhawatiran akan proses kelahiran yang
aman untuk dirinya dan bayinya serta rasa nyeri
pada proses persalinan (Bobak, 2005). Beberapa
penelitian telah membuktikan bahwa wanita yang
mengalami kecemasan sewaktu hamil akan lebih
banyak mengalami penyulit persalinan.
Proses persalinan dimulai dengan adanya
penipisan dan pembukaan servik. Penipisan dan
pembukaan merupakan akibat langsung dari
kontraksi. Kontraksi akan menjadi lebih sering,
lebih lama, dan intensitasnya semakin kuat.
Kontraksi uterus pada persalinan bersifat unik,
mengingat kontraksi ini merupakan kontraksi otot
fisiologis yang menimbulkan nyeri pada tubuh
(Varney, 2008). Kemajuan persalinan pada kala I
fase aktif merupakan saat yang paling melelahkan,
berat, dan kebanyakan ibu mulai merasakan
sakit atau nyeri, dalam fase ini kebanyakan ibu
8 JURNAL ILMIAH BIDAN, VOL.I, NO.3, 2016
merasakan sakit yang hebat karena kegiatan rahim
mulai lebih aktif. Pada fase ini kontraksi semakin
lama, semakin kuat, dan semakin sering yang
dapat menimbulkan kecemasan. Kecemasan pada
ibu bersalin kala I bisa berdampak meningkatnya
sekresi adrenalin. Salah satu efek adrenalin adalah
konstriksi pembuluh darah sehingga suplai oksigen
ke janin menurun. Penurunan aliran darah juga
menyebabkan melemahnya kontraksi rahim dan
berakibat memanjangnya proses persalinan hingga
dapat menyebabkan persalinan lama. Rasa tidak
nyaman dan nyeri akan dirasakan oleh wanita
seiring kemajuan persalinan. Lamanya waktu
yang diperlukan pada kala I dan Kala II akan
menambah bahaya kematian janin, sehingga perlu
menyelesaikan persalinan dengan tindakan segera
baik induksi maupun Sectio Cesarea.
Sebuah metode lama yang sampai sekarang
masih digunakan dalam pelayanan kehamilan
adalah senam hamil, dimana senam hamil juga
merupakan metode relaksasi dan latihan pada
ibu hamil yang menjadi program tetap pada
pelayanan antenatal, bertujuan agar ibu hamil siap
mental dan jasmani dalam menghadapi proses
persalinan. Dimana fisiologis dari latihan senam
hamil ini adalah latihan ini akan membalikkan
efek stres yang melibatkan bagian parasimpatetik
dari sistem syaraf pusat (Domin, 2001). Relaksasi
akan menghambat peningkatan syaraf simpatetik,
sehingga hormon penyebab disregulasi tubuh dapat
dikurangi jumlahnya. Sistem syaraf parasimpatetik,
yang memiliki fungsi kerja yang berlawanan
dengan syaraf simpatetik, akan memperlambat
atau memperlemah kerja alat internal tubuh.
Akibatnya, terjadi penurunan detak jantung, irama
nafas, tekanan darah, ketegangan otot, tingkat
metabolisme, dan produksi hormon penyebab
stres. Seiring dengan penurunan tingkat hormon
penyebab stres, maka seluruh badan mulai berfungsi
pada tingkat lebih sehat dengan lebih banyak
energi untuk penyembuhan (healing), penguatan
(restoration), dan peremajaan (rejuvenation)
(Domin, 2001). Dengan demikian, ibu hamil akan
merasa rileks seiring dengan menurunnya gejala
 Pengaruh Kombinasi Yoga Prenatal dan Senam Hamil
kecemasan. Senam hamil ini dibentuk dalam suatu
kelas ibu hamil yang menjadi program disetiap
puskesmas di Indonesia.
Di Kabupaten Nganjuk kejadian preterm
masih sering ditemui, data dari tahun 2012 terdapat
190 kasus kelahiran preterm, kasus tersebut
menurun hingga 173 kejadian pada tahun 2013,
sedangkan pada tahun 2014 terdapat 182 kasus
kelahiran preterm, hasil studi pendahuluan yang
dilakukan di RSUD Nganjuk pada 07 September
2015 dari data sekunder didapatkan angka kejadian
sectio caesaria 1077 kasus pada tahun 2012, 1019
pada tahun 2013, sedangkan meningkat pada tahun
2014 terdapat 1681 kejadian, pada bulan September
2015 sudah tercatat 1533 kejadian. dimana faktor
yang mempengaruhi kejadian sectio caesaria
antara lain adalah adanya komplikasi dalam
kehamilan, faktor lain adalah atas permintaan
pasien sendiri dengan alasan khawatir akan rasa
sakit saat persalinan normal, dan sebagian memang
menginginkan operasi. Sedangkan kejadian
partus lama (prolonged active phase) pada tahun
2012 sebanyak 48 kasus. Kejadian partus lama
tertinggi selama dua bulan (September - Oktober
2013) adalah 18 kasus di RSUD Nganjuk. (Dinas
Kesehatan Kabupaten Nganjuk, 2012).
Metode Penelitian
Jenis penelitian ini adalah kuantitatif dengan
metode penelitian quasy-experimental (experiment
semu) rancangan Non-Equivalen Group Desain,
Desain ini hampir mirip dengan pretest-postest
control group design, tetapi pada desain ini
kelompok ekperimen dan kelompok kontrol
tidak dipilih secara random. Dalam desain ini,
baik kelompok eksperimental maupun kelompok
kontrol dibandingkan, kendati kelompok tersebut
dipilih dan ditempatkan tanpa melalui random.
Dua kelompok yang ada diberi pretest, kemudian
diberikan perlakuan, dan terakhir diberikan posttest
Rancangan penelitian ini sebagai berikut :
Berdasarkan perhitungan diatas, maka
jumlah sampel yang dibutuhkan untuk masing-
masing kelompok adalah 12 responden. Sehingga
jumlah sampel yang seluruhnya untuk 2 kelompok
adalah 24 responden.
1) Tahap pra pemberian perlakuan
a) Pengukuran sebelum perlakuan.
Pretest Perlakuan Post test
O1 -----------------X------------------- O2
O ------------------ X0----------------- O4
Gambar 1. Rancangan Penelitian
b) Memberikan penjelasan kepada masing-
masing kelompok bahwa akan diambil sampel
darah untuk pemeriksaan kadar hormon kortisol
5 menit sebelum perlakuan.
c) Pengambilan darah dilakukan oleh peneliti
d) Darah yang diambil adalah darah dari vena
mediana cubiti sebanyak 3 cc dengan spiut 3 cc
dan needle G24, disimpan dalam vaccutainer
kemudian di sentrifuge dan disimpan dalam
kulkas yang bersuhu -800C, sambil menunggu
jumlah sampel darah seluruhnya lengkap.
e) Setelah jumlah sampel darah seluruhnya
lengkap dilakukan pemeriksaan ELISA untuk
mengetahui kadar hormon kortisol sebelum
dilakukan perlakuan pada ketiga kelompok.
2) Tahap pemberian perlakuan
a) Kelompok perlakuan diberikan intervensi
kombinasi yoga prenatal senam hamil masing-
masing 1 kali dalam seminggu dengan durasi
60 menit selama 3 minggu
b) Senam hamil diberikan pada 1 kelompok
sampel dengan lama pemberian 3 minggu, 2
kali dalam satu minggu
c) Follow up bagi sampel yang tidak bersedia, jika
ada yang tidak bersedian sesuai dengan jadwal
yang telah ditentukan akan dihubungi oleh
peneliti untuk mengantisipasi drop out.
3) Tahap pengukuran setelah perlakuan
a) Setelah menjalani perlakuan selama 3 minggu,
JURNAL ILMIAH BIDAN, VOL.I, NO.3, 2016 9
Pengaruh Kombinasi Yoga Prenatal dan Senam Hamil

diambil darah kembali pada masing masing 4) Tahap Akhir

kelompok
b) Darah yang diambil adalah darah dari vena
mediana cubiti sebanyak 3 cc dengan spiut 3 cc
dan needle G24, disimpan dalam vaccutainer
kemudian di sentrifuge dan disimpan dalam
kulkas yang bersuhu -800C, sambil menunggu
jumlah sampel darah seluruhnya lengkap.
c) Sementara menunggu terkumpulnya sampel
darah, sampel dicentrifuge di laboratorium RS
Sumber Waras Kertosono Nganjuk.
d) Setelah jumlah sampel darah seluruhnya
Pada tahap akhir ini, responden akan diikuti
sampai inpartu untuk diobservasi lama persalinan
kala I fase aktif. Setelah data hasil pengisian
kuesioner kadar hormon kortisol selesai dianalisa
maka kegiatan selanjutnya meliputi tabulasi,
pengolahan, analisis data, pembahasan, serta
penarikan kesimpulan, penyusunan laporan hasil
penelitian berdasarkan data yang telah terkumpul
dan dilanjutkan dengan seminar hasil penelitian.
Hasil penelitian

Kadar kortisol

Kadar kortisol Kelompok Perlakuan Kelompok Kontrol p value

(n=13) (n=13)
Sebelum perlakuan
Mean ± SD, Median 219,82±48,58, 281,67 303,85± 198,53, 270,39 0,7391
Min- Mak 217,04, 373,47 81,36, 819, 72
Sesudah perlakuan
Mean ± SD, Median 82,15±27.046, 79,16 167.53±79.20, 153.19 0,0022
Min- Mak 56,00, 138, 34 56.63, 293.86
Perbedaan sebelum- 0,0003 0,0014
sesudah perlakuan
p value
Selisih kadar kortisol
Mean ± SD, Median -209.67±56.297, -195.82 -129.96±186.93, -62.76 0,0101
Min- Mak -317.47, -118.96 -673.51, 41.33

LAMA PERSALINAN KALA I

Lama Persalinan Kala I Kelompok Perlakuan Kelompok Kontrol p Value
(n=13) (n=13)
Sesudah Perlakuan
Mean ± SD, Median 4,08±1,29, 3,5 5,54±0,9005, 5,5 0,003*
Min- Mak 2.5, 6.5 4,5, 7,0

lengkap dilakukan pemeriksaan ELISA di Pembahasan

laboratorium Gaki Universitas Diponegoro
Semarang untuk mengetahui kadar hormon Berdasarkan hasil penelitian didapatkan
kortisol setelah dilakukan perlakuan pada bahwa nilai p= 0,739 lebih besar dari 0,05 artinya
kedua kelompok. tidak ada perbedaan rerata kadar kortisol yang

10 JURNAL ILMIAH BIDAN, VOL.I, NO.3, 2016

 Pengaruh Kombinasi Yoga Prenatal dan Senam Hamil
bermakna sebelum intervensi antara kelompok
kontrol dan kelompok perlakuan. Setelah diberikan
perlakuan selama 3 minggu didapatkan hasil
bahwa nilai p= 0,002 lebih kecil dari 0,05 artinya
ada perbedaan rerata kadar kortisol yang bermakna
sesudah intervensi pada kelompok kontrol dan
kelompok perlakuan.
Rerata kadar kortisol kelompok perlakuan
yang diberikan intervensi kombinasi yoga
prenatal dan senam hamil mengalami penurunan
lebih banyak dibandingkan kelompok kontrol,
yang hanya diberikan intervensi senam hamil.
Rerata kadar kortisol pada kelompok perlakuan
mengalami penurunan sebesar -209.67 ng/ml.
Rerata kadar kortisol pada kelompok kontrol
juga mengalami penurunan sebesar -129.96
ng/ml.
Hasil penelitian ini didukung oleh
teori yang menunjukkan bahwa Latihan yoga
dihubungkan oleh adanya peningkatan Gamma
Amino Butyric Acid (GABA) (Streeter et al,
2010). GABA merupakan neurotransmitter
yang memegang peranan penting dalam
gejala-gejala pada gangguan jiwa. Fungsi
utama GABA adalah menurunkan aurosal dan
mengurangi agresi, kecemasan dan aktif dalam
fungsi eksitasi (Subu, 2011). Brown et al (2005)
menyatakan bahwa yoga merupakan suatu
metode yang unik untuk menyeimbangkan
sistem saraf otonom dan memberikan pengaruh
pada gangguan fisik dan gangguan yang
berhubungan dengan stress. Teknik pernafasan
yoga menyebabkan terjadinya peningkatan
kerja parasimpatis, memberikan efek tenang,
merangsang pelepasan oksitosin dan disebutkan
juga dengan latihan pernafasan yoga selama
tiga minggu menyebabkan penurunan produksi
hormon kortisol yang signifikan.
Perbedaan Lama Persalinan Kala I Pada
Kelompok Intervensi Dan
Kelompok Kontrol
Berdasarkan hasil penelitian Rusmita (2011),
senam hamil yoga mampu meningkatkan kesiapan
fisik dalam menghadapi persalinan sebesar 60,8%.
Sedangkan dalam penelitian Putri (2013), angka
kejadian robekan perineum saat persalinan mencapai
90% pada ibu yang tidak melakukan senam hamil.
Menururt penelitian Widyawati & Syahrul (2013), ibu
yang melakukan senam hamil mengalami persalinan
lebih cepat 1,80 kali dibandingkan ibu hamil yang
tidak senam (Widyawati & Syahrul, 2013). Sedangkan
dalam penelitian Maharana et al(2013), intervensi
senam hamil yoga 1 jam perhari dari usia kehamilan
19-20 minggu didapatkan hasil lama persalinan kala
I, lebih singkat dari pada kelompok kontrol. Selain itu
menurut penelitian Almasyhur (2010), ada pengaruh
senam hamil yoga terhadap kekuatan otot dasar
panggul wanita primigravida postpartum pervaginam
sebesar 1,75 mmHg pada kondisi tanpa kontraksi dan
1,5 mmHg pada kondisi kontraksi.
Selain kondisi psikologis kekuatan otot-otot
dasar panggul juga berperan dalam kelancaran dan
kenyamanan persalinan, diantaranya adalah otot
perineum. Pada saat persalinan robekan perineum
terjadi pada hampir semua persalinan (primigravida
yaitu 73,53% dan multigravida 57,14%) (Juaria &
Istianawati, 2012). Di Indonesia robekan perineum
juga merupakan penyebab kedua perdarahan
post partum. Menurut Rosdiana (2010), robekan
persalinan dipengaruhi oleh paritas, jarak kehamilan,
riwayat persalinan dan berat bayi lahir. Berdasarkan
hal tersebut sebaiknya ibu mempersiapkan
kenyamanan persalinan dimulai dari masa
kehamilan. Salah satunya adalah dengan melakukan
senam hamil yoga (Wahyuni & Siswanto, 2010).
JURNAL ILMIAH BIDAN, VOL.I, NO.3, 2016 11
Pengaruh Kombinasi Yoga Prenatal dan Senam Hamil
Daftar Pustaka
Adikusuma. (2003). Penatalaksanaan Stres. http://www.
kabefarma.com 123.htm (diakses 5 Maret 2015)
Aron DC, Tyrell JB. 1998. Glucocorticoid dan androgen
adrenal. Dalam : Greenspan FS, Baxter D. Editor.
Endokrinologi dasar dan klinik. Edisi 4. Jakarta:
Penerbit buku kedokteran EGC,;398-445
Bahiyatun. 2008. Asuhan Kebidanan Nifas Normal.
Jakarta:EGC
Basford & Oliver, S. (2006). Teori dan Praktik
Keperawatan Pendekatan Integral Pada Asuhan
Pasien.Jakarta: EGC
Beddoe, A. E., Yang, C. P., Kennedy, H. P., Weiss, S. J., &
Lee, K. A. 2009, „The effects of mindfulness-based
yoga during pregnancy on maternal psychological
and physical distress‟, Journal of Obstetric,
Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing: JOGNN,
38(3), 310-319.
Brown et al. 2005. Sudarshan Kriya Yogic Breathing in
The Treatment of Stress, Anxiety and Depression:
Part I Neurophysiologic Model, (Online), (http://
www.thevirafoundation.org/images/Trauma_
Treatment_Breathwork_Part_I.pdf, diakses : 10
Juni 2016).
Cance Mc, Kathryn L, and Jane S. 1994. Stress and
Disease in “Pathophysiology”. USA: Mosby 304-
307
Cunningham FG, Gant NF, Leveno KJ, Gilstrap Iii LC,
Hauth JC, Wenstrom KD.
Williams obstetric. 21th ed. New York: Prentice-Hall
International, 2001:262 66
Dariyo, A. (1997). Hubungan antara Percaya Diri dengan
Kecemasan Menghadapi Kelahiran Bayi pada
Wanita Hamil Pertama. Skripsi. tidak diterbitkan.
Yogyakarta: Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Gadjah
Mada
Dahlan, Sopiyudin., 2014. Statistik Untuk Kedokteran
dan Kesehatan Edisi 6. Jakarta, Epidemiologi
Indonesia.
Davis, Kyle J. (2013). The Feasibility of Yoga in the
Treatment of Antenatal Depression and Anxiety: A
Pilot Study. (Thesis Master). Diakses dari: ProQuest.
UMI Number: 3592273
12 JURNAL ILMIAH BIDAN, VOL.I, NO.3, 2016
Domin, V. (2001). Relaxation-How Good Are You at
Relaxing? www.hypnosisupdate.com
Duman RS, Malberg J and Nakagawa S. 2001.
Regulation of Adult Neurogenesis by Psychotropic
Drugs and Stresss. Pharmacology and Experimental
Thera-peutics. 299:401-107
Guyton, A.C., dan Hall, J.E. 2008. Buku Ajar Fisiologi
Kedokteran. Edisi 11.Jakarta: EGC
Heardman.1996. Senam Hamil. Jakarta: Arcan.
Indiarti. (2009). Panduan Lengkap Kehamilan,
Persalinan,dan Perawatan Bayi. Yogyakarta:
Diglossia Media.
Jacoeb TZ. 2002 Organ Endokrin Ektragonad
Pada Reproduksi Wanita.Jakarta: Kursus
imunoendokrinologi reproduksi dasar,: 8-12
Kalil, K. M., Gruber, J. E., Conley, J. G., & LaGrandeur,
R. M. (1995). Relationships among Stress Anxiety,
Type A, and Pregnancy-Related Complications.
Journal of Prenatal andPerinatal Psychology and
Health. Vol. 9 (3), 221-232
Kartono, K. (1992). Psikologi Wanita: Mengenal Wanita
Sebagai Ibu dan Nenek. Bandung: Mandar Maju
Kementerian Kesehatan RI, 2011. Profil Kesehatan
Indonesia 2010. http://www.depkes.go.id.
Krisnandi, Sofie Rifayani. 2010, Sinopsis Yoga Untuk
Kehamilan: Sehat Bahagia dan Penuh Makna. http//
bukukita. Jakarta. Diakses 18 Agustus 2015
Kushartanti, W., Soekamti, E. R., & Sriwahyuniati,
C. F. (2004). Senam Hamil: Menyamankan
Kehamilan,Mempermudah Persalinan. Yogyakarta:
Lintang Pustaka
LeUnes, A. & Nation, J. R. (2002). Sport Psychology.
USA: Wadsworth.
Manuaba, IBG, dkk. 2010. Ilmu Kebidanan Penyakit
Kandungan Dan KB. Jakarta: EGC
Mitchell, Jennifer L. (2012). Yoga Effects on Prenatal
Depression. (Disertasi Doktor). Diakses dari:
ProQuest. UMI Number: 3518833
M. Satyapriya, R. Nagarathna, V. Padmalatha, H.R.
Nagendra. Efficacy of Yoga on Pregnancy Outcome
. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary
Medicine. April 2005, 11(2): 237-244.
Neuman, Inga D dan Landgraf, Rainer. 2008. Advances
in Vasopressin and Oxytocin to Behaviour to
 Pengaruh Kombinasi Yoga Prenatal dan Senam Hamil
Disease. British: Elsevier Publication
Notoatmodjo, Soekidjo. 2003.Pendidikan Dan Perilaku
Kesehatan. Rineka. Cipta. Jakarta.
Priantono, H. (2003). Lanny Kuswandi: Terapi
Hypnobirhing, Melahirkan Tanpa Sakit. Dalam
Kompas. 23 Januari 2003
Prawirohardjo, S. 2009. Ilmu Kebidanan. Penerbit
Yayasan Bina Pustaka Sarwono Prawirohardjo.
Jakarta.
Product information & manual, Human IgA Platinum
ELISA, BMS2096/BMS2096TEN. Bender
MedSystems GmbH. Camus Vienna Biocenter 2
1030 Vienna, Austria.www.eBioscience.com
Reis, Pamela J. (2011). Prenatal Yoga Practice in Late
Pregnancy and Pattering of Change in Optimism,
Power, and Well-Being. (Disertasi Doktor). Diakses
dari: ProQuest. UMI Number: 3456492
Rokhmah, R, N. (2010), Hubungan Meditasi Dalam
Yoga Terhaadap Daya Tahan Terhadap Stres
Pada Paguyuban Yogiswaran Surakarta. http//
etd.eprints.ums.ac.id/858/. Diakses 18 Agustus
2015. (Skripsi)
Sarafino,E.P.(1994), Health Psychology (2.Ed). New
York; willey
Sastroasmoro, Sudigdo dan Ismail. Dasar- dasar
metodologi Penelitian Klinis Edisi 4. Jakarta:
Sagung Seto. 2011; 365
Selye, H. (1996).The Stress of Life. New York :
McGraw Hill
Setyawan S. 2003. Mekanisme Cooping. Surabaya:
Lab Ilmu Faal Fakultas Kedokteran UNAIR. 1-4.
Sherwood, Lauralee.2001.Fisiologi Manusia.
2ndEdition.Jakarta:Buku Kedokteran EGC
Silverthorne. 2001. Human Physiology an Inntegrated
Approach, 2th. Ed. San Francisco.Pearson
Education, Inc.
Siska, Connie. 2009. Siapa Bilang Yoga Itu Sulit.
Jakarta. Mediatama.
Shindu, Pudjiati. Yoga untuk Kehamilan Sehat,
Bahagia, dan Penuh Makna. Bandung. Penerbit
Qanita. 2009; 23:4:26:28-29:34-35:38-44:46-
47:96-111
Streeter et al. 2010. Effects of Yoga Versus Walking
on Mood Anxiety, and Brain GABA Levels: A
Randomized Controlled MRS Study, (Online),
(http://online.liebertpub.com, diakses: 18 Agustus
2015)
Stocker S. 2012. Studies Link Stress and Drug
Addiction. NIDA Research Finding 14:1-4.
Sttopard, M. (2008). Conception Pregnancy And
Birth: Ensiklopedia Kehamilan. Surabaya:
Erlangga
Stuart, 2001. Konsep Kecemasan.(online).Tersedia
di:http://morningcamp.com/?p=237/Konsep
Kecemasan
Subu, Arsyad. 2011. Anatomi Otak dan Neurophysio-
pshycology dan Gangguan Jiwa, (Online), (http://
www.google.co.id, diakses: 18 Agustus 2015).
Sumarah, dkk. 2008. Perawatan Ibu Bersalin (Asuhan
Kebidanan Pada Ibu Bersalin). Yogyakarta :
Fitramaya
Susanti Ni Nengah, 2008. Psikologi Kehamilan.
Jakarta : EGC.
Taylor,S.E,Peplau, L.A.,Sears,D.O.Social Psycology.
Prentice Hall : New Jersey; 1997.
Thomas D Giles MD, Barry J. Materson MD, Jay N.
Cohn MD, John B. Kostis MD. Definition and
classification of hypertension: An Update. 2009.
JCH. Volume 11. Issu 11. November 2009
Titian, Amalia. 2009. Adaptasi Psikologis Menjelang
Persalinan. Dalam http://titianamalia.wordpress.
com. Diakses 13 Maret 2015
Veronica O’Keane, Michael S Marsh BMJ. Depression
during pregnancy.2007;334:1003-1005,
doi:10.1136/bmj.39189.662581.55. 2007.
Wahyuni Dan Layinatul, 2013. Manfaat Senam Hamil
Untuk Meningkatkan Durasi Tidur Ibu Hamil.
Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat. UNNES
Wiadnyana, M.S. (2010). The power of yoga for
pregnancy and post pregnancy.Gramedia
widiasarana. Jakarta: Taruna Grafika.
Widdowson R. (2004). Yoga For Pregnancy. London:
Heron Quays Dockland.
Wulandari, PY. Efektifitas Senam Hamil Sebagai
Pelayanan Prenatal Dalam Menurunkan
Kecemasan Menghadapi Persalinan Pertama.
INSAN Vol. 8 No. 2 Agustus, 2006
JURNAL ILMIAH BIDAN, VOL.I, NO.3, 2016 13
 ANALISIS JURNAL

Name Of Analize
Point Of Review Journal 1st Journal 2nd Journal 3nd
Judul riset Prenatal Yoga for Back Pain, Balance, and Pengaruh Kombinasi Yoga Prenatal dan Senam
Maternal Wellness: A Randomized, hamil terhadap perubahan kadar kortisol dan
Controlled Pilot Study lama persalinan kala I
Peneliti Selma C Holden, Brad Manor, Junhong Zhou, Elok Sari Dewi, Ari Suwondo, Sri wahyuni
Chloe Zera, Roger B Davis, at all
Tempat publikasi jurnal Publisher: Global advances in Health and Publisher: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidan
(tingkat akreditasi jurnal Medicine Jurnal Internasional Index Sinta 4
Nasional/Internasional/Indeks) Jurnal International index by SCImago
Journal Rank (SJR)

Waktu jurnal dipublish 2019 2016

MASALAH PENELITIAN
Tujuan penelitian 1. Untuk menilai kelayakan, keamanan dan Membuktikan pengaruh kombinasi yoga
penerimaan dari intervensi yoga prenatal prenatal dan senam hamil terhadap
12 minggu perubahan kadar kortisol dan lama persalinan
2. Menilai efek yoga pada rasa sakit, kala I
kesejahteraan ibu dan bayi
Hal penting dan kritis yang Pada awal percobaan aktivitas olahraga Tidak ada
diselesaikan peneliti yoga belum di sarankan selama kehamilan
oleh the American College of Obstetrians
and Gynecology (ACOG), namun setelah
selesai percobaan ACOG memperbarui
pedoman praktik yaitu sekarang yoga
sebagai latihan umum yang
direkomendasikan selama kehamilan.
Kebaruan/orisinalitas pada Tidak ada Tidak ada
masalah
Menurut anda, apakah Ya, penelitian ini menantang karena pada Ya, penelitian ini menantang yaitu pada saat
permasalahan riset tersebut saat riset dilakukan belum ada rekomendasi peneliti harus melakukan pemeriksaan ELISA
unik dan menantang? di laboratorium untuk mengetahui kadar
 ACOG untuk melakukan yoga pada hormone kortisol pada kedua kelompok
kehamilan. sebelum dan sesudah perlakukan.
KONTRIBUSI YANG DIKLAIM
Menurut anda, apakah ada hal ACOG memperbarui pedoman praktik yaitu Tidak ada
baru dalam jurnal tersebut? sekarang yoga sebagai latihan umum yang
(bila ada, Jelaskan!) direkomendasikan selama kehamilan
Metodologi Penelitian Study prospective, randomized controlled Kuantitatif quasy-experimental non equivalen
(design, sample, Variabel) pilot clinical trial. subject is perempuan group design. Jumlah sampel 12 responden
berumur 18-39 tahun with uncomplicated utk masing-masing kelompok total 24
pregnancy. responden.
Jumlah sampel 20 (intervensi yoga perenatal Variabel: Yoga prenatal, kadar kortisol dan
n=11; educational support n = 9) lama persalinan kala 1
Variable: yoga prenatal, maternal wellness,
lowbackpain
Type Of Evidence Randomized Controlled Trial Uncontrolled Experiments
Level Of Evidence Category I Category II-3
Rank of Journal
(H indeks)/sinta score dan
Indexing

Sinta score: S4
Indexing: garuda
H indeks: 6

H Indeks: 7
Indexing: pubmed, HINARI, Proquest