Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Development of A Mechanical Device For Concealing Underground Urban Solid Residual Containers
Development of A Mechanical Device For Concealing Underground Urban Solid Residual Containers
& Design
Materials and Design 26 (2005) 602–608
www.elsevier.com/locate/matdes
Abstract
In this paper, a design process of a mechanical device for concealing underground the urban solid residual containers is described.
A computer aided design, with simulation and animation software, was used in this work. This software allows us to analyse the
kinematics of the virtual prototype before producing the real one. Methodological process of the preliminary design, valuation
of alternatives and the design finally adopted are presented. There is also special reference to the tribological problems found in
the design. The design is an innovative solution, which also takes environmental issues into consideration: preserving monumental
areas of the city, bettering the quality of life of the inhabitants and showing the local governmentÕs concern regarding the environ-
ment. The design has been patented by the company that collaborated in the development.
2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction, specifications and objective of the work Initially PRIMUR proposed the following aspects
and specifications to be kept in mind during develop-
The Mechanical Engineering department of the Uni- ment which could be summarized in Fig. 1:
versity of Oviedo has carried out the design tasks, elab-
oration of plans and calculations, manufacturing and (a) To keep the garbage out of the citizensÕ way.
recognition of a prototype of an electro-mechanic sys- (b) To reduce the environmental impact of the garbage
tem for concealing underground the urban solid residual to the minimum.
containers, that is presented in this article. The Com- (c) Reduction of negative visual impact.
pany has presented the patent application for the design. (d) To reduce the collection frequency, making it possi-
The number of the application is P200001117. ble to use containers of great dimensions.
PRIMUR (Projects and Installation of Urban Mate- (e) Modulate structure for one, two or more
rial, S.A.), the company that has financed the study, is containers.
mainly dedicated to the production of urban material (f) To make vessel/receptacle in prefabricated concrete
in Spain. or in a non-corrosive structure.
(g) To make a corrosion resistant construction.
(h) Good resistance to the corrosion and vandalism.
*
Corresponding author. Tel.: +34 985 181 925; fax: +34 985 181
(i) To make a water-proof system that is easy to
945. install.
E-mail address: rvijande@uniovi.es (R.V. Dı́az). (j) Tip-back cover.
0261-3069/$ - see front matter 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2004.08.012
R.V. Dı́az et al. / Materials and Design 26 (2005) 602–608 603
2. Project stages
running, smooth operation, and low friction, as well as This solution simplifies the design and, because the
better adaptation to the available space [2]. cam is fixed to the platform, a one and only action mo-
tor is needed for all assembly.
Nevertheless, two shock absorbers were added to the
3.1.4. Option 3: final solution (Fig. 6)
unit to correct the small impacts that take place with
The drive mechanism is the same described in option
each of the rollers when entering or leaving contact with
2b with the addition of a rotary drum combination
the cover. Additionally, the guides, with the sliding roll-
opening, which provides user safety and self-cleaning
ers, prevents the cover surpassing its vertical point, in
function.
case of wind gusts or due to the influence of the position
of the centre of gravity.
3.2. Stage 3: opening and closing mechanism of the cover
3.3. Stage 4: mechanisms and systems for container lifting
This mechanism was one of the most problematic
from the kinetic-tribologic point of view due to the high
3.3.1. Option 1 (Fig. 8)
loads and combination of movements that it shows.
At first a platform was chosen as shown in Fig. 8,
The cover has a rotation movement. Additionally,
which was dragged by an electric motor with a brake
this rotation motion of the cover must be variable (high
that, by means of a belt transmission, rotated a worm
speed at the beginning of the opening to avoid crashes
gear and a nut, both fixed to the platform.
with the container and slow at the end to decrease the
At this time the option of using a motive hydraulic
inertia).
system was discarded, in favour of an electric one, due
The lifting platform moves at a constant speed.
to contamination and price reasons.
It was, then, necessary to coordinate both motions by
Due to the interest in decreasing the depth of the
means of synchronized independent mechanisms so that
receptacle, it was necessary to decrease the separation
the cover leaves sufficient room for the lifting of the con-
length D among the support rollers that support the
tainer. For example, a hydraulic or electrician mecha-
load of the moving platform. In consequence, the
nism to open up and to close the cover, and another
momentum on these rollers and nut increased in such
one to open up and to close the platform.
a way that it caused the materials of the nut (brass
and antifrictional) not to support them and therefore
3.2.1. Final solution (Fig. 7) causing its deformation.
It was decided that a singular drag system would be
used. The mechanism must have two degrees of free- 3.3.2. Option 2 (Fig. 9)
dom: a cam with rollers in their periphery for, by means It was thought using two motors with their respective
of rolling, to decrease the friction. worm gear and nut would be a solution. The difficult
606 R.V. Dı́az et al. / Materials and Design 26 (2005) 602–608
Fig. 7. Opening and closing mechanism of the cover: drag sequence by cam and rollers.
Fig. 12. Photo of the prototype with the adopted final solution.
Fig. 10. Scaled prototype: (a) Closed, (b) Opening, (c) Completely
opened.
Fig. 13. Final appearance of the first installation carried out as test
prototype by the users of the city of Gijón.
Fig. 11. Motor, belt transmission and power screw positioning for the
lifting mechanism. 4. Conclusions
0.07 m/s (the container lifts in 30 s), the power screw pitch In this work that has been presented, we want to
Tr 48 · 8 P8, the motor speed of 1500 rpm and the belt highlight some aspects that we consider interesting:
transmission speed reduction (Dwg = 200 mm; dwk = 71
mm), makes the speed gear unnecessary, and the self- 1. Those stages of the design that have had a bigger
locking power screw allows us to omit the brake. All of influence in tribologic considerations have been
this simplifies the system and reduces the final cost. emphasised.
608 R.V. Dı́az et al. / Materials and Design 26 (2005) 602–608