Professional Documents
Culture Documents
S A Gnificant Oblem Aysian Actors?: I Late or Non-Payment Si PR To Mal Contr
S A Gnificant Oblem Aysian Actors?: I Late or Non-Payment Si PR To Mal Contr
Malaysian Contractors?
Abstract
Some devel op ed cou n tries have dra wn lip construc tion -sp ecific s tatu tory sec uri ty of paymen t
ac ts/ legisla tions typically known as Con s tru cti on Cont rac ts Act to eliminate poor pa ym en t
pract ices and to ass ist con tinu ous uninterrupted cons truct ion wo rks. Malaysia too canno t p retend
not to hav e these p robl em s. This paper p resent s find ings of a s tudy cond ucted amongst Malays ian
cont ractors with the aims to det erm ine the seriousness of late and non- payment problem s; to
identify the main causes and effects of late and non-payment; and to identify ways to sus tain the
payment flows in the Malaysian cons truction indust ry. The stud y focused on contractual payments
from the paymaster (government or private) to the cont ractors. The main factors for late and non-
payment in the cons truction ind us try iden tified from the study include: de lay in certification,
paymaster's poor fina ncial man agement, local cultu re /n ttu ude , pay master's failure to impl em ent
goo d governance in business, underpayment of certified am ou nts by the pa yma ster and the use of
' pay when paid' cla uses in contrac ts. Th e resear ch findin gs sho w that late and no n-payment can
crea te cash flow p roblems, stress and financi al hardship on the contractors . Amo ngs t the most
approp ria te so luti ons to ove rcome the problem of late and non-payment faced by local con trac tors
include : a right to reg ular pe riod ic payment, a righ t to a defined time fram e (or paym ent and a
right to a speedy dispute resoluti on mechanism. Pro mp tness of submi tting, p rocessing, issuing
in terim payment certifica tes and honouri ng the certificate s are extremely impo rtan t issu es in
relation to progress payment claims. Perhaps, an increased sense of professionalism in construction
ind ustry could ove rcome some of the problem s related to late and non- payment issues.
35
JO llrl/ol of Design tuu! tlu: Bui lt EflViroll1llt'lI f
The problem of late and non-paytnent is purposel y ena cted to add ress issu es on
exp erienced not on ly in fast de vel op ing p rompt p a y m e nt in the constr uc tion
economics, as in the case of Malaysia, but . industry to elim inate poor pay ment p ractices
also in de vel op ed countries, such as the and smoo the n the con tractor's cash flow
United Kingdom . For ins tance, a survey of (Lip, 2005; Ameer Ali, 2005). Ac ts and the
the Pa yment Perfo rman ce in Britain has res pec tive countries an d s tates, w hi ch
shown that the construction indu stry, in enacted them to add ress the p robl em of late
particular, is prone to lat e-pa ym ent culture, and non-p aym ent, are listed as follow s:
w ith paym ent o f de bts due to subco n tractors
and suppliers bein g made, on average, 53 i. Ho using Gran ts, Co ns truct io n and
days aft er inv oices or applicati on s fo r Regenerati o n Ac t 199 6 - Uni ted
payme n t hav e been rende red (Johnston, Kingdom
1999). ii. Build in g and Co ns truc tion Ind us tr y
In the local scene, Class F contractors Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) -
(the s ma lles t catego ry of con tracto r New Sou th Wa les, Aus tra lia
class ifica tion) w ho are eligible for projects iii. Bu ild ing a nd Co ns truc tion In dust ry
cos ting RM200,000.00 a nd below; such as Security of Payme n t Act 2002 (VIC) -
v illage or 'kamp ung' roads , repair and Victoria, Australia
restoration of schools, police stations, drains, iv, Buil d in g and Co ns truction Industry
and s to res, often face paym en t-rela ted Payments Act 2004 (QLD) - Q ueensland,
problems besid es lack of jobs (Suh aini, 2005). Au stralia
In 2005, abo ut 16,000 Class F con tractors v. Cons truction Contrac ts Act 2002 - Ne w
we re on th e brink o f ban k ruptcy w hen Zealand
sev eral umbrella contractors failed to pay vi. Build ing and Co ns truc tion Secur ity of
them for rural roa ds they had built, d espite Pay me nts Ac t 2004 - Singapore.
the governme nt hav ing paid the umbrella
con trac tors in full (Su ha ini, 2005). O wi ng to lack of researc h on the iss ues of
Several rel ated s tudi es have bee n late and non-p a yment in the Malaysian
con ducted in othe r de veloped countries cons tructio n ind us try , a s tudy w as
w hich addressed th e probl em s rela ted to cond uc ted to id entify the problems a nd
payment issues in the construction industry. effects of late and no n-paym en ts in the
For exa mple in the Unit ed Kin gd om the so - co ns truction ind ustry . The rese arc h
called Latha m Repo rt (Lat ha m, 1994) has co incided w ith the lo cal Co ns truc tio n
introduced so me radical mea su res to resolve Ind us try and Development Board 's in tention
p ro blems rel ated to paymen t issues in th e to seek pointers on pay ment issues . This
cons truc tion industry by in tro d ucing the pap er p resents results of a study on la te and
Constructi on Contracts Act, es tablishing non-pay m ent issues facing the Malaysian
mandatory trust funds for paym ents and con tracto rs . Ano the r portion of the study,
sugges ting tha t adjudicati on sho uld be the th at d es cr ibe s the sa me is sue facing
normal me thod of d isp u te reso lu tion. Some consulta n ts, is presen ted elsewhe re (crDB,
of th e recom m end a lions h a v e bee n 2006).
inc orpora ted in the Part II of the Hou sing
Grants, Cons truction and Regen eration Act
1996. Proble m Statem en ts
Pa ym ent p ro bl e ms have p rom p ted There are m echanisms provide d in tnany
so me cou n tries like Un ited Kin gd o m,
standard forms of construction contrac ts
Singap ore, New Zealand and SO B1 C states in
de alin g with payme n t from the client to the
Aus tra lia, e.g. New Sou th Wales, to legislate
co ntracto r, yet ther e rema ins a chronic
their cons truction speci ficstatutorypaytnent problem of late and non-payment issues in
security regime . These leg isla lions wer e
36
te Late 01' NOll-Paymen t A Sigmficnllt Problem To Malaysian Contractors?
37
[ou rna! of Design awi tile Built Environment
38
Is Lnte Or Non-Ptrfmcnt A SigllifiCnlIt Problem To Malaysiall COll trnclors?
employe r de lays in making paymen t to under sect ion 74 of the Contracts Act
the contractor this in turn w ill result in 1950. However, the test in Hadley v
contractor's delay in m ak ing payment Baxendale as to w hether da mages in the
to the sub-contractors and suppliers. forms of interest can be pa id for, is
dependen t on the ques tion of w hether
b) Resu lts in delay in completion of p rojects the likeli h o o d o f th e occurrence of
Late paymen tcauses cash flow problems dama ges was an ticipate d by bo th
w hich in tu rn can affec t th e overa ll parties at the time when the contract was
progress of works (Ameer Ali, 2005a). made, havi ng regard to the know ledge
Acco rdi ng to A bdu l- Rahman a n d of the parties at the time . Therefore, if
Berawi (2002) financia l p ro bl e m is th e e mp loyer was aware th a t th e
confirmed by the top management as the con tractor was forced to borrow the
ma in cause of del ay in addition to capital, the contrac tor may be able to
manpower shortag e. claim interest or financing charges for
la te or unpa id paymen t. The refore, a
c) Lead s to ba nkruptcy or liqu id a tion clear wo rding in the con tractis required
Lat e payment ma y affec t the fin ancial to prov ide contrac tu al mechanis m for
status o f th e con tractor. A lo cal the contractor to claim for interest or
newspaper reported tha t 16,000 F-class financing charges.
co ntractors were on the bri n k of In M al a ysi a , only Sub-cla uses
bankruptcy when several umbre lla 42.9(b) and 42.12 o f CID 132000 form
co n tractors failed to pay them for rura l comprehensively provides entitlementto
roads they h a d b u il t, despite th e claim for interest du e to employer's late
government having paid the u mb rella and unpa id payment as we ll as for any
con tractors in full (Suhaini, 2005). failure or delay by the Superintendent
Officer in certifying any pay ment d ue .
Such an express provision is essentia lly
. required in order to avo id disputes on
A tterna t iu e R em edie s f or Secur ing
this iss ue es pec ia lly if it goes to
Pilym ent Debt unnecessary expensive arbitration or
Based on the literature reviews the following litigation proceedings.
have been identified as the possible remedies
for secur ing pay ment d ebt fro m the b) Sus pension o f Work
defaulting clien t: It is uni versally known tha t there is no
C01nn10n law right of suspension of work
a) Payment of Stip ula ted Interest du e to non-p ayment. The con tractor is
The issue of whe ther the con tractor is obliged to proceed w ith the work in a
entitled to clai m for loss of in terest d ue regula r and . d iligen t ma nne r
to d elay and defa ult of the em ployer in not with stan di n g the fact th at he is not
making payment is still unclea r. In FC being paid for the works he has execu ted
Minier Ltd v Welsh Health Techni cal p reviou sly. The Court of Appeal of New
Services Organization (1980) 13 BLR 1, a Zealand in the case of British Pipe Lilies
claim for interest due to late paymen t v Christchurch Drainage (1986) 33 BLR
was upheld by the Court of Appeal. The 76 has hel d th a t a contractor has no
reason for this is beca use claim on implied right of temp orar y suspe nsion
interest for late paymen t is considered following non-payment on the part of
as direct lo s s a nd /or expense the emp lo ye r. Th e deci s ion was
equiva lent to a claim for damages as subseq ue n tly follow ed in the English
decided in Hadley v Baxendale (1854) 9 case of Lubenluun v South Pembrokesuire
Ex 341 and which has been codified
39
IOIlYllnl of Design nlld tlte Built Ellvirollmellf
(1986) 33 BLR 39 wh ich affirmed the of non -payment under Sub-clause 11(7).
p os iti on of co n t ra c to r ' s r ight of Havi ng discussed the importance of
suspension. This fact has been expressly such right it is ap prop riate to include
acknowledged by the local court in Knlr this provisio n in all the s tanda rd forms
Selig Construction Sdn Bird. v Seisin ava ilable in Ma laysia . Per h ap s by
Deuelopmeni Sdll. Bird. [1997J 1 CLJ Supp incl uding th is provision in the
448. Malaysian Cons truction Contract s Act
According to Murdoch and Hu ghes it wo uld force the incorpo ratio n of the
(1996), it is not uncommon to find that a rig ht to sus pend the work in all the
contractor or sub-contractor who has not standard forms of contract, because once
been pa id what is due th reat ens to the Act is in force it will provide certain
sus pe nd work under the contract until mand atory requirements that must be
payment is made. It must be noted that followed by an y construction contrac t
without a clear contrac tual right to that falls wi thin the ambit of the Act
suspend the works, the con tractoris no t failin g which a default scheme will kick
en titled to do so ev en th oug h the in and bo th parties in the con tract must
em ployer has failed to pay him w ithin comply with it. In the UK, Section 112of
the time stipu lated in the contrac t. In this the HGC RA provides tha t when the
respect, if the contrac tor suspe nds the su m is not paid on the fina l day of
work the courts may find him guilty of pay ment and no wi thhold ing notice has
repu di ating the contract. This w ill in been issued by the emp loyer, in th is
tu rn open for the o ther party to accep t circums tances the con tractor is entitled
the repud iation and rescind the con trac t to suspend his performance until the full
and s ue for damages. payme nt is paid bu t strictly subjec t to
Hyp othetically, a contractor is only the issua nce of7 days' noti ce stating his
entitled to suspe nd the works following int enti on in suspend ing the wo rk and
non -payment if such a s tipulation is gro und s of suspension.
exp ress ly spelled ou t in the contrac t.
However, the right to suspend the works c) Right to refer d ispute to Adjud ication
can o nly be found in ClD B2000. For Adjudicatio n is defined as a process
exa mple, Clause 42.10 s tates that if the where upon request by one of the parties,
employer fails or neglects to pay the a n independe n t adjudica to r steps in
co ntractor the amount on any certificate (even when work is ongo ing or services
wi th in the Period o f H onou ri ng arc being provided) and makes binding
Certifica te, and contin ues such defa ult decision on disputes within da ys o r
for fourteen (14)days the contractor can weeks. For example in the UK, the
giv e a not ice specifying his intention to adjud ica to r is required to make a
suspe nd the execution of the works. If binding decision wi thin 28 day s.
the employer still continues such default The in teresti ng feature o f
for ano ther fourteen (14) days after the adjudication is that the dispute in
receipt of the notice, the contractor can question can be referred to an
suspe nd wh olly or partly the execution independent third par ty at any tim e
of works o r reduce the rate of execution pro vided th a t both parties ar e in
of the works. It should be noted that contract. In practice a dispu te is being
ther e ar c no simi la r p rovisions referred to the arbitra tion when the
regarding this ma tter in PAM1998 and project is completed. Ironically, in claims
JKR 203 /203A Forms. Stra ngely, the involving a large su m o f money a
PAM No minated Sub-con tract Standa rd co ntractor would strugg le to su stain his
Form prov ides the righ t to suspend the cash flow before he can co mmence the
work to the sub-contractor in the event arbitra tion proceeding . Eve n worse,
40
Is Late 0,. NOli -Payment A Siguifican! Problem To Malaysiall Contractors?
o Mh i i:1g
due to the nature of the decision which rr\u. lC 7.2 6~;'
41
Journal of Design and tlu: Built Environmen t
( ·~ nrr~,l o,,' fllp<rh ncr \lhh i'\" o n.l '~·n",nr I ~ O., 'u~ m< ~' l \l~ "' d ('onlr .. lo.. ' t:"I" r1 , n, ~ \ll rh '''' ~ n. I'~ .' m, n l l n l' rh~l t t'unJ.;J
1', ,,)«1> I'roj«1>
O Nu
, ,,,,., ,ss. '@ i;3'' ' II " '''', o w,
c Nu
O " li" i:l ~
N". lJ 1. 4 1 ~ ;
Fig ure 2: Contractors' Experience w ith Non-Payment in Government and Private Funded
Project
monetary aspec t, the ques tion naire was These figures rep resent feedbacks from 113
drafted to enable resp ondents to state the and 160 res pondents w ho are invo lved in
amo unt of la te o r non-p aymen t w hic h pub lic a n d p r iva te sec tors p roj ects ,
rem ains owed by their paymasters since respectively. These sta tistics show that late
January 2000. The amoun t of mo ney still and non-p aym en t is su e has be co me a
owed by the paymasters to contractors is sy ndrome in the Malays ian constr uction
nearl y RM370 m illion for governme n t- indu stry and immediate m easures must be
funded projec ts and about RM510million for in troduced to m iniruis e the cash flo w
pr iva te funded pr ojects as show n in Table 1. problems in the constructio n indus try .
Table 1: Total Amount Wh ich Remains Overdue for Contrac tors si nce
January 2000 to Date of Response
Sta tistic Item Amo unt remains overd ue in Amount remains overdue in
government funded projects private fund ed projects
42
Is Late Or Non-Paument A Significant Problem To Mnlnysinl/ Contractors?
o 0 .5 1.5 2
M e a n
Figure 4, shows the responses on the question abo ut the causes of non-paymen t. Based on
Figure 4, th ree most frequent causes of non-payme nt are "Paymaster's poor [inancial
management," "Paymaster's failure to implement good gooernance in business," and "Delay ill
certification, " wi th their overall means of 1.896, 1.848, and 1.768 respectively.
o 0 .5 1. 5 2
M e an
Delnltcr in Certification J
It is a norm in the construction industry where a cons ultant de lays in certification although
an appropriate claim has bee n made by the contractor. The con tractor however can easily
recover the payment debt if the adjudication provision is provided in the sta ndard form of
-con tract. If there is an adjudica tion provision in place, the aggrieved party can take the
matter to a neu tral third party who can decide based on materials submitted to him and this
problem can be reso lved in ma tters of days. Thus, the contractor's cash flow will not be
disrupted . .
43
[ourna! of Design and till.' Built Enninnnnen t
Loenl Culture/Attitude
"Loca l culture/a ttitude" has been ranked as one of the main causes of late and non-payment
pred icamen t in Malaysian cons truc tion ind ustr y. It is generally accep ted tha t our ind us try
is prone to late and non-payment culture. The situati on in Malaysia now is somewha t similar
to the UK cons truction industry before the intr od uction of the Housin g Gran ts, Construction
and Regenera tion Act 1996 (HGCRA). The cons truc tion industr y in the UK was prone to late
payment cu lture w here delay of 53 days of making pay men t after the receipt of inv oice was
not un common (Johnston , 1999).
2 .377
1 .7 1 9
o 0.5 1.5 2 2 .5
M oan
As for the effects of non-payment, the three most preva lent effects of non-pay ment based on
Figure 6 are "Create cnsti flow problems," "Crea tes[inanciai hardship" and "Create stress Oil
contractors" with thei r overall mea ns as 2.546, 2,454 and 2.40, respectively.
44
Is Lnte Or NOll -Payment A Significa llt Problem To Malaysiall Con tractors?
2 .0B 1
o 0 .' ...
M e an
2 2.' 3
Crea te FinancialHardslzip
•
It is an ticipa ted tha t late payment can create un due fina ncial hardships o n the contractor.
For ins tance, the ma in contrac tor is still obliged to pay the sub-contractor / su pplier for their
wo rk d one even tho ugh he is no t being paid under the main con trac t. This ca use s financia l
har dsh ip to the contrac tor as he is not su pposed to self-fina nce the job for his client.
45
[ourna! of Design and th« Built Ennircnment
countries. The three mos t preferabl e remedies to counteract the payment problem s based on
Fig ure 7 are "A rig'" 10 regllior periodic poymelll," "A right to a dejined lime[m niefor poymellf"
and "A rig'" 10 a speedy displlie resolution mechanism, for example, Adjlldicatioll," with their
over all mean s of 3.72, 3.695 and 3.509, respe ctively. For this qu estion, four is the largest scale
and one is the least. Interest ingly, the overall nine po ssible so lu tions in the qu estionnai re
were all given a high score of im portance as the least score was eve n as high as 3.147 as
show n in Figure 7.
o 2 3 4
M e an
46
Is Late Or Nou-Painnen! A Sig1Jifica ut Problem To Malaysian COlltractors?
47
JO l/mal of Design and the Built EIIViro1J IIIl'll t
It is sugges te d th at the em p loyer's British Pipe Lines v Chris tchurch Drainage (1986)
fina ncial capaci ty an d cred it rating be made 33 BLR 76.
CIOB (2006), A Report of (/ Questiollllaire SlIruey
transparent to facilitate con tracto rs to assess 0 11 Late a nd No n -Puument Issues ill ilt«
the em ploye rs' ability to pay and to increase Malaysiall COllst1'llcfi01i I1 /dllstry, March 2006
chances of th e lat te r g etting p a id. It is CIO B Stand ard For m of Co nt ract for Build ing
perhaps timel y for Malaysia to consider Works 2000 Ed ition.
in trod ucing it s own legi sl ation on the C IOn (2004), Construct ion Act Ccneulmtlc n:
"hup rouing Paymellt Practices", 14 Oc to ber
Paymen t a n d Adju d ica tion Ac t. 2004 [Retrieved Augus t 8, 2005J h ttp :/ /
Nevertheless , introducti on of such a n act www .ciob.org.u k/ciob /sitcRoo t/
cannot be regarded as a panacea for all ills, New s _Roo m/
ra ther it mu st be regarded a means to an end. Co ns t r u c t i o n _ I nd us t ry _ N ew s /
Professio na l b o die s a n d goven u ne n t Arti cle.aspx?id=724
Dav is Langdo n & Sca h Consultancy (2003),
age ncies sho u ld s tu dy and a me nd th e COllstruclioll Payment Btuee-Wily Tlutt Domino
existing sta nda rd fo n ns of contrac t to Effect, ExecutiveSunnnarics for the Pract itioner.
p rovide protec tion a nd promot e a ba lanced Vo lum e 3, Is s u e 3, Sep tember 2003,
alloca tio n of ris k a n d fair con trac t to all Singa pore.
relat ed parti es. Prompt ness o f subm itting , FG Minter Ltd v Welsll Health Technica l Services
Orgnniuuion (1980) 13 BLR 1.
proc ess ing , is suing inte ri m paym ent Hadlelf v Baxe",lale (1854) 9 Ex 341.
certificates and hon ou rin g the cer tificates are Joh ns to n, S. (1999), OeMs and intcree! ill tIJ e
ex tre me ly impo rtan t issues in rel a tion to cons truct ion indusirs]: A guide fa Tile Late
prog ress paymen t cl a ims . Pe rh a p s, a n Payment of Commercia! Debts (illterest) Act
increased se nse of profess ionalism in the 1998, Tho mas Telfor d Lim ited , London.
Kah Se lig Cons truct ion Sd n Blld. v Sels in
construc tion ind ustry cou ld overcome some Deoetopment Sdn. Bltd. [1997] 1CLj Supp 448.
of th e prob le ms r el a ted to late a nd non- Ke nn ed y, P. (2005), Stat istics and Tre nds ill
paym ent iss ues . Another cruci al issue tha t Statutory Adjudicatioll ill the UK siJlcl' 1998 ,
needs to b e ad dressed is why and how to In ter n a t ion al Fo r u m O n Constr uc tion
change the some times lack adaisical atti tude Ind ust ry Payme nt Act And Adju dic a tion,
13&14 Sep tember 2005, Kua la Lum pur
on pa ymen t iss ues in the co ns truc tio n Co nve nti o n Centre, Kua la Lumpu r,
ind us try . Mal aysia,
La th am , M. (1994), Cons tructing tlu: Team : Fina!
Report - Joint Rev iew of Procurement alld
Contractual Arrnllgel1le1J ts ill tile UK, HMSO,
References UK.
Abd ul-Rahman, H ., Berawl. M.A ., Berawi, A.R., Lim, C. F. (2005), Tlte Malaysiall Construction
Mohamed, 0 ., O th man, M. and Yahya, LA., Indllstry - Tile Present Dilemmasof tile Ullpaid
(2006), Delay Mi tigatioll ill tile Malaysiall Cot/trac tors, Int er n at ional For u m O n
Cons truction Lnduetru , [o urn al of Cons truction In d u s try Pay men t Ac t And
Co ns t r uc tio n , Engineeri ng a nd Adjud ication, 13&14September 2005, Kuala
Ma nagemen t, American Socie ty of C ivil Lump ur Conven tion Cen tre, Kua la Lumpur,
Engi ne ers (ASCE) , Vol. 132, Numbe r 2, Ma lays ia .
February 2006, PI" 125-133. Lip, E. (2005), The Cltallgillg Role of lite QI/alllily
A mccr Ali, N .A.N . (2005a ), Paymellt ill the SI/rveyor und er tlu: Security of Pmnnent
COI1 StrllctiOIl IJld l/stry - Towards Zero-Default, Legi slati oll in Singapore, QS Nationa l
QS Na tiona l Co nve n tion 2005, 10 - 11 Convention 2005, 10-11 Aug ust 2005, H ilton
August 2005, Hilton Kua la Lum pu r. Kua la Lu mpu r.
Ameer Ali, N.A.N. (2005b), Construction Illdlfslry Luuenham v SO/ltll PelllbrokeslEire (1986) 33 BLR
PaYlllent and AdjlIdicatioll Act, Redllcillg 39
Payment Defau lt (/ ud t n crcnsing Diepu tc Ma laysian Co n tracts Act 1950.
Resotutlon Efficiellcy, In terna tional Fo rum On N icho las, N. (2005), Late PaYl1lellt Cultlire Creates
Co ns tr uct ion In dustry Paymen t Ac t And Domino effect, Accountan cy Age , 30 Jun 2005,
Adjud ication, 13&14September 2005, Kuala [Ret ri eved Februar y 13, 2006J ht tj2;.il
Lumpur Co nve ntion Ce ntre. Kua la Lumpu r, www.vJ1 uneLcom/ articles / prin t/2139274
Malaysia. PAM1998 Standard Form of Build ing Contract.
BOl/lfgl/es v. Dahl-ienson [2000] BLR522.
48
Is Late Or NOll-Payment A Sigllifica"t Problem 1'0 Malaysia" COlltmetors?
Preside nt's & CEO's Round table Discussion Riches, J.L., Ch ristopher D. (2004), Construction
(20 04) . Til, WO lf Forwa rd Towards Global Adjudication, second ed ition, Bla ck w e ll
Competitioe ness - Malaysiall Const ruc tion Publish ing, Oxford
[/llillsiry Mosler 1' [0 11 fMClM P), or ganized by Rourke, J.W. & Gentry, C A. (2002), M issollri
the Cons truction Indu stry Dev e lo pment Pro/1/ pt Payment Laws Appli cable to
Board Malaysia, 24 June 2004, Legend Hotel, Cons truction Projects, Journal of the Missouri
Kuala Lumpur. Bar Vo l58 (3) {O nli n e] Ma y -Jun e 2002
PWD203A / 203 Standa rd Form of Con tract. [Rc tri e v ed Sep te m be r I, 20051 h llp :/ I
The Ass ocia te d Genera l Co n trac to rs o f ww w .moba r.org / jo urnal1 2002 1 rna yj1I n 1
Ame rical America n Subco n trac tor s ro u rke.h tm
Associatio n, Inc. / As sociated Specia lty Su haini, A. (2005), No joy [or Ille 5 11101/ builders,
Contractors (2003), Guidelines for a Successful The Star Onli ne, 8 Ma y 2005. [Retrieved
Construction Project: Guideline 0 11 Owner's June 13, 2005 ] h llp:1 I th es la r.com. my l
Ability 10 Pay, [Retrieved Ju ly 31, 2005] hllp :/ n e w s I lis t.a s p? fil e= 1 200 5 I 5 1 81 fo c u s l
1 www .cons lrucliong u ide lines .org/ pd f1 10890860&sec=locllS
A20wne rsAbili tyto Pa y.pdf
Notes
See section 108(3) of the HGC RA and
pa rag raph 23(3) of par t 1 01 the Scheme
ofCons truction Co n tracts (Eng land and
Wales)
49