Journal Pre-proofs

Full Length Article

Effects of FDM-3D printing parameters on mechanical properties and micro‐

structure of CF/PEEK and GF/PEEK

Peng Wang, Bin Zou, Shouling Ding, Lei Li, Chuanzhen Huang

PII: S1000-9361(20)30280-6
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2020.05.040
Reference: CJA 1651

To appear in: Chinese Journal of Aeronautics

Received Date: 25 February 2020

Revised Date: 1 April 2020
Accepted Date: 22 April 2020

Please cite this article as: P. Wang, B. Zou, S. Ding, L. Li, C. Huang, Effects of FDM-3D printing parameters on
mechanical properties and microstructure of CF/PEEK and GF/PEEK, Chinese Journal of Aeronautics (2020),
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2020.05.040

This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover
page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version
will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are
providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors
may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

© 2020 Production and hosting by Elsevier Ltd. on behalf of Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Chinese Journal of Aeronautics

Journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/cja

Effects of FDM-3D printing parameters on mechanical

properties and microstructure of CF/PEEK and GF/PEEK
Peng WANG a,b,c, Bin ZOU a,b,c,*, Shouling DING a,b,c, Lei LI a,b,c Chuanzhen HUANG a,b,c
a Centre for Advanced Jet Engineering Technologies (CaJET), School of Mechanical Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan
250061, China
b Key Laboratory of High-Efficiency and Clean Mechanical Manufacture at Shandong University, Ministry of Education, Jinan

250061, China
c National Demonstration Center for Experimental Mechanical Engineering Education, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China

Received 25 February 2020; revised 1 April 2020; accepted 22 April 2020

Abstract

Fused deposition modeling (FDM) has unique advantages in the rapid prototyping of thermoplastics which have
been developed in diverse fields. However, although great efforts have been made to optimize FDM process, the
mechanical properties of printed parts are limited by the weak interlamination bonding as well as the poor
performance of raw filaments used, such as acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), polylactic acid (PLA). Adding
fibers into thermoplastic matrix and preparing high-performance filaments have been indicated to enhance the
properties of fabricated parts. Recently, heat-resistant polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and its fiber reinforced
composites were proposed for FDM process due to overcoming the limitation of equipment and process. However,
few researches have been reported on the effects of FDM-3D printing parameters on the mechanical properties of
fiber reinforced PEEK composites. Therefore, 5wt% carbon fiber (CF) and glass fiber (GF) reinforced PEEK
composite filaments were prepared respectively in this study. The effects of various printing parameters including
nozzle temperature, platform temperature, printing speed and layer thickness on the mechanical properties
(including tensile strength, flexural strength and impact strength) were surveyed. To analyze the microstructure and
failure reasons of printed CF/PEEK and GF/PEEK samples, the tensile fractured surfaces were investigated via
scanning electron microscope (SEM).
Keywords: Fused deposition modeling; Printing parameters; Fiber reinforced PEEK composites; Mechanical properties;
Microstructure;

*Corresponding author. E-mail address: zb78@sdu.edu.cn, cajetzb@163.com (B. ZOU)

1. Introduction1

In recent years, 3D printing technology has been developed rapidly in diverse application fields, such as aerospace,
automotive, electronics, medical and other fields.1-5 Compared with traditional subtractive machining methods (e.g.,
turning, milling, grinding),6-13 3D printing is an additive manufacturing method based on principle of layer by layer
·2 · Chinese Journal of Aeronautics

stacking to realize direct prototyping of complicated structure parts, shorting production cycle and reducing cost.14
Fused deposition modeling (FDM), the most extensively used 3D printing technology, has unique advantages in the
forming of thermoplastics.15 Although great efforts have been made to optimize the FDM process from all aspects
including slice height, nozzle size, building temperature, raster angle, fill style, printing speed, etc.,16-18 the properties
of FDM-3D printed parts are still limited by the weak interlayer adhesion as well as the poor performance of raw
filaments used. At present, the mechanical properties of most FDM-3D printed general polymer parts are difficult to
meet the requirements of industrial application.19
Preparing new-type FDM filaments to improve the mechanical properties of 3D printed parts have been
investigated in previous studies. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK), a special engineering plastic with excellent
thermophysical properties, has been reported for FDM-3D printing recently due to overcoming the limitation for
filaments extrusion technique. And the mechanical properties of PEEK are significantly superior to ordinary polymer
materials, such as acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), polylactic acid (PLA).19 Furthermore, in some special fields
PEEK can potentially be used to replace some metal (Ti-6Al-4V) or ceramic (ZrO2) materials.20-22 Yang et al.23
investigated the effect of thermal processing parameters during the FDM 3D printing process on the mechanical
properties and crystallinity of printed PEEK. Wang et al.24 explored the printing parameters for PEEK using finite
element analysis (FEA), and systematically studied the surface quality and the mechanical properties by FDM
experiments. In addition, results suggest that high-temperature platform is conductive to improve the adhesion
strength between deposited filaments. Mechanical properties including tensile strength, flexural strength and impact
strength of printed PEEK parts can reach approximately 80% of injection molded parts after optimizing FDM
parameters.25
Adding fibers into thermoplastic matrix has been demonstrated to effectively enhance the performance of
composites. Researches on FDM-3D printing of fiber reinforced composites mainly concentrated on ABS, PLA and
other matrix polymer with better fluidity. Zhong et al.26 reported that the glass fibers (GF) can improve the tensile
strength of 3D printed GF/ABS at the expense of flexibility and ductility. Tekinalp et al.27 evaluated the tensile
strength of FDM-3D printed carbon fiber (CF) reinforced ABS composites with fiber contents ranging from 10wt%
to 40wt%. The results show that the tensile strength and Young’s modulus grew with the increase of fiber content,
although internal porosity of printed composites sample enlarged. Sang et al.28 comprehensively evaluated the
thermal, physicochemical as well as melting rheology properties of basalt fiber (KBF) reinforced PLA composite
filaments, and studied the effects of fiber content and fiber length on the mechanical properties and
micromorphology of 3D printed KBF/PLA composite parts. Ning et al.29 compared the effects of two reinforcements,
carbon fiber and graphite, on the tensile strength and porosity of ABS composites fabricated by FDM process.
Besides, investigations on the effects of different FDM process parameters: raster angle, infill speed, nozzle
temperature and layer thickness, on the mechanical properties of CF/ABS was firstly reported by Ning et al.30,31
Although optimizations on the fiber content and FDM process parameters for fabricating composites have been
made, the mechanical performance of most 3D printed fiber reinforced composites are still inadequate to exceed that
of pure PEEK printed by FDM.19 However, few researches on FDM-3D printing fiber reinforced PEEK composites
have been reported, owing to the difficulty in the preparation of composite filaments and extruding this composite
with high melting temperature and high viscosity in FDM process. Stepashkin et al.32 found the anisotropy of thermal
conductivity of printed CF/PEEK which was caused by fibers orientation along the filling path. However, fiber
content higher than 20wt% in CF/PEEK composites causes excessive melt viscosity which leads to failure of 3D
printing. Recent research showed that the flexural strength and module of vertical printed 5wt% CF/PEEK
composites higher than that of horizontal samples.33 Nevertheless, the reinforcement effect of short carbon fiber is
not prominent for the mechanical properties of CF/PEEK. It is noteworthy that FDM process parameters have
significant effects on the thermophsical properties of fiber reinforced PEEK composites,34 including mechanical
properties, melting temperature, crystallinity, viscosity, etc. Besides, owing to higher thermal conditions used in
FDM process of fiber reinforced PEEK composites, the melting rheological behavior and bonding properties of
materials are different from ordinary polymer.24,35 Consequently, it is crucial to investigate the proper process
parameters to obtain stronger mechanical properties of fiber reinforced PEEK composites fabricated by FDM. The
effects of 3D printing parameters on mechanical properties of fiber reinforced PEEK composites require to be
reconsidered. However, it has not been reported in previous investigations focused on fiber reinforced
high-temperature polymer.
In the present study, carbon fiber and glass fiber reinforced PEEK composites filaments were prepared
respectively and used for FDM process. The effects of different 3D printing parameters including the nozzle
temperature (Tn), platform temperature (Tp), printing speed (v) and layer thickness (d) on the mechanical properties
(tensile strength, flexural strength and impact strength) of printed CF/PEEK and GF/PEEK parts were investigated.
The fractured surfaces of tensile samples were observed by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) to analyze the
failure reasons of 3D printed CF/PEEK and GF/PEEK composites.
 Chinese Journal of Aeronautics ·3·

2. Experimental work

2.1. Fabrication procedure of 3D-printed samples

Short carbon fiber (CF, Zoltek Co., Ltd, USA) and short glass fiber (GF, Jushi Group Co., Ltd, China) reinforced
PEEK (450G, Jilin Zhongyan High Performance Plastic Co., Ltd, China) composite filaments with a diameter of 1.75
mm were fabricated respectively by high-temperature extruder (Jiangsu Junhua PEEK, China). In our experiment,
the density of PEEK450G is 1.3 g/cm3 and the melting temperature of PEEK450G is 343 °C. The tensile strength,
flexural strength and unnotched impact strength of PEEK are 107 MPa, 163 MPa and 136 kJ/m2 respectively. The
characteristics of chopped carbon fiber and chopped glass fiber are listed in Table 1. It is noteworthy that the fibers
have been treated by the manufacturers and were prepared for thermoplastic specially. The glass fibers were treated
by silane coupling agent and the carbon fibers were treated by anodic oxidation. Subsequently the composite
filaments were prepared as test samples using a homemade high-temperature FDM-3D printer, as shown in Fig. 1. In
this series of experiments, fiber weight fraction of 5% was selected since parts printed by such content led to better
mechanical properties based on previous preliminary experiments. It is noteworthy that the volume fraction of CF
(3.83%) in printed CF/PEEK is larger than that of GF (2.55%) in GF/PEEK owing to the distinction in density
between CF (1.72 g/cm3) and GF (2.61 g/cm3).

Table 1 Characteristic of CF and GF.

Fiber Diameter (μm) Average length (μm) Density (g/cm3) Tensile strength (GPa) Tensile modulus (GPa)

Carbon 6.5 205 1.72 3.9 220

Glass 11.7 196 2.61 2.1 70

Fig. 1. Preparation process of filaments and 3D-printed samples.

2.2. FDM-3D Printing parameters

FDM-3D printing parameters can significantly affect the mechanical properties of printed fiber reinforced polymer
composites. According to previous results,24 nozzle temperature (Tn), platform temperature (Tp), printing speed (v),
layer thickness (d) were selected as the main investigated FDM 3D printing parameters. As described in Fig. 2, the
nozzle temperature and platform temperature could affect the melting fluidity and solidification crystallization of
deposited composites, respectively. The printing speed refers to the traveling speed of printing head, which influence
·4 · Chinese Journal of Aeronautics

the cross-section shape of deposited filaments. The layer thickness is the vertical height of each deposited layer,
which has obvious effect on the porosity and interlayer adhesion. Moreover, the raster angle for alternate layers were
45° and -45° and the building orientation are illustrated in Fig. 2. Other FDM-3D printing parameters were fixed and
selected by preliminary studies,24 such as the nozzle diameter of 0.4 mm, overlap interval of 0 mm, extrusion flow
of 100%. Table 2 displays the different levels of each investigated printing parameter. Single factor experiments
were developed to explore the effects of each parameter on mechanical properties of printed CF/PEEK and
GF/PEEK.

Fig. 2. FDM-3D printing parameters studied in this series of experiments.

Table 2 3D printing parameters for PEEK, CF/PEEK and GF/PEEK.

Nozzle temperature Platform temperature Printing speed Layer thickness

Tn (°C) Tp (°C) v (mm/s) d (mm)

400, 410, 420,430, 440 260 15 0.2

420 240, 250, 260, 270, 280 15 0.2
420 260 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 0.2
420 260 15 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.25, 0.3

2.3. Testing and analysis

In this study, the tensile samples (dog-bone shape refer to ISO 527-2: 2012) and flexural samples (80 mm×10 mm×4
mm, ISO 178: 2010) of PEEK, CF/PEEK and GF/PEEK prepared by FDM process were tested at room temperature
(25 °C) on a computer-controlled universal testing machine (WDW-50E, Shidai, China) respectively. The impact
samples (80 mm×10 mm×4 mm, ISO 179-1: 2010) were measured by the simply-supported beam test using an
impact tester (XJJ-50, Jinjian, China). Fig. 3 illustrated the dimensions of samples and load case for each test. Three
samples were printed for tensile test, flexural test and impact test respectively under each combination of printing
parameters listed in Table 2.
Microstructure of fractured tensile samples surfaces of CF/PEEK and GF/PEEK were investigated using a
scanning electron microscope (SEM, JSM-7610F Japan) after the samples were coated with a thin gold layer prior to
observation.
 Chinese Journal of Aeronautics ·5·

Fig. 3. Dimensions and load case of FDM-3D printed samples.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Effects of nozzle temperature

Effects of nozzle temperature on mechanical properties including tensile strength, flexural strength and impact
strength of FDM-3D printed PEEK, CF/PEEK and GF/PEEK parts are illustrated in Fig. 4. It can be seen from Fig. 4
(a, b) that with the increase in nozzle temperature from 400 °C to 440 °C, the tensile strength and flexural strength of
PEEK, CF/PEEK as well as GF/PEEK increase. However, the impact property of fiber reinforced PEEK composites
is not obviously affected by nozzle temperature. Besides, the tensile strength of CF/PEEK is stronger than that of
GF/PEEK at the same nozzle temperature (Fig. 4 (a)) which is due to the higher fiber volume content and tensile
strength of CF than that of GF. However, the rising nozzle temperature has more significant improvement on the
flexural performance of GF/PEEK (Fig. 4 (b)) due to higher interfacial bonding performance of GF/PEEK than that
of CF/PEEK. As mentioned above, the fibers have been treated and prepared for thermoplastic specially. However,
the active functional groups on carbon fibers after anodic oxidation decrease with time which is not conductive to
improving CF-PEEK interfacial properties.36-38 At the nozzle temperature of 440 °C, the tensile strength of 5wt%
CF/PEEK reaches a maximum value of 94MPa which is about 20% higher than that of pure PEEK printed by FDM,
and the flexural strength of 5wt% GF/PEEK even exceeds that of injection modeling PEEK. However, the higher
nozzle temperature of 440 °C could not be conductive to printing due to deterioration phenomenon of matrix PEEK
material because of the excessive melting temperature.23 In addition, the addition of 5wt% fibers leads to the decline
of impact resistance of PEEK composites by approximately 50%, as shown in Fig. 4 (c).

Fig. 4. Effects of nozzle temperature on mechanical properties.

Further studies on the fracture morphologies of 3D printed tensile samples observed by SEM were produced to
explore the causes for these phenomena. It is presented as Fig. 5 (a1, b1, c1) that evident interlayer separation exists
with the nozzle temperature of 400 °C, however, when the nozzle temperature rising to 440 °C, the interface among
adjacent layers is well combined. This is due to better melting fluidity and formability of material at higher nozzle
·6 · Chinese Journal of Aeronautics

temperature, leading to stronger interlayer bonding to resist tensile and bending loads. In addition, the chopped fiber
is well wrapped by PEEK polymer at nozzle temperature of 440 °C, which can provide great bearing capacity for
tensile load, as displayed in Fig. 6 (b). While at nozzle temperature of 400 °C, the interface among the matrix PEEK
and fiber is indicated poor adhesion (Fig. 6 (a)).

Fig. 5. SEM of tensile fracture surface of 3D printed PEEK, CF/PEEK and GF/PEEK with different nozzle
temperatures.

Fig. 6. SEM of interface between fiber and PEEK in 3D printed composite samples with nozzle temperature of 400
°C and 440 °C.

However, adding short fibers declines the toughness of FDM-3D printed PEEK composites. Flat fracture
cross-section can be seen from Fig. 5 (b2, c2), indicating the brittle fracture characteristics of printed composite
tensile samples. Similarly, observations on sample morphologies after impact test also indicates that 3D printed
PEEK without the addition of fibers possess a better toughness than fiber reinforced PEEK composites, as illustrated
in Fig. 7. The main reason of this phenomenon can be ascribed to a certain number of extensive pores inside 3D
printed fiber reinforced PEEK composite parts. Partial pores among deposited paths were formed by FDM process
itself;35 however, most small pores were caused by mixing chopped fibers during filament extrusion process. In order
to prove the impact of filament preparation on the porosity of fabricated composite samples, cross-sectional
morphology of 5wt% GF/PEEK filament was observed as illustrated in Fig. 8, showing widespread internal pores
with approximately 20 μm in diameter. And these pores are the reason of the failure of 3D printed fiber reinforced
PEEK composites when the samples bear the impact force.
 Chinese Journal of Aeronautics ·7·

Fig. 7. Morphology of 3D printed PEEK, CF/PEEK and GF/PEEK samples after impact test.

Fig. 8. SEM of cross-sectional fracture surface of 5wt% GF/PEEK filament.

3.2. Effects of platform temperature

Fig. 9 reveals the effect of platform temperature on the mechanical properties of FDM-3D printed PEEK, CF/PEEK
and GF/PEEK parts. It can be seen that the influence regularity of the platform temperature on the mechanical
properties is basically consistent with that of the nozzle temperature: the tensile properties and flexural properties
enhance as the platform temperature rising. When the platform temperature rises from 240 °C to 280 °C, the tensile
strength of CF/PEEK increases by most obviously to 15%, and GF/PEEK has the largest improvement approximately
10% in the flexural strength. It is noteworthy that in the FDM-3D printing process of fiber reinforced high
temperature resistant resin PEEK, the platform temperature was selected in the range of 240 to 280 °C to ensure the
great adhesion between the printed material and the bottom platform. In the preliminary experiment, the
delamination and warpage of the printed samples were prone to occur when the platform temperature dropped to 230
°C.
From the scanning electron micrographs of the tensile fracture surfaces in Fig. 10, it can be found that clear
interlayer gaps and big pores at 240 °C platform temperature which might be too low to generate the well-coalesced
parts. However, the internal gaps become smaller when the platform temperature increases to 280 °C, suggesting the
forming of good interlayer fusion. Higher platform temperature produces more energy which makes the molten
deposition material difficult to solidify. Hence, adequate infiltration and diffusion among filaments could improve
the inter-laminar bonding effect.35 This phenomenon caused by high temperature platform has a resemblance to
properties enhancement provided by heat treatment process which can increase molecular mobility of matrix PEEK,
develop crystallinity and reduce internal defects of samples.23 In addition, it can be seen from Fig. 10 (b1) that pores
are located on the cross-section of fractured deposited path, demonstrating that these pores originate from prepared
filament as shown in Fig. 8.
·8 · Chinese Journal of Aeronautics

Fig. 9. Effects of platform temperature on mechanical properties.

Fig. 10. SEM of tensile fracture surface of 3D printed PEEK, CF/PEEK and GF/PEEK with different platform
temperatures.

3.3. Effects of printing speed

What can be seen from Fig. 11 is that with the growth of printing speed in the range of 5 mm/s to 25 mm/s, the
tensile strength of PEEK, CF/PEEK and GF/PEEK decreases by 10%, 8% and 10% respectively, and the flexural
strength were reduced by 11%, 8% and 9% respectively. However, it should be noted that the reduction of 55% and
68% on the impact strength of CF/PEEK and GF/PEEK respectively can be reached when the printing speed
increases to 25 mm/s, which is significantly distinct from effects of nozzle temperature and platform temperature on
impact strength. Similarly, the 3D printed CF/PEEK possesses better tensile properties than GF/PEEK, while
GF/PEEK tends to have better bending and impact performance especially when the printing speed is less than 10
mm/s, which is owing to the difference of fiber volume content as well as fiber mechanics characteristic between
carbon fiber and glass fiber.
 Chinese Journal of Aeronautics ·9·

Fig. 11. Effects of printing speed on mechanical properties.

Fig. 12 shows the scanning electron micrographs of printed PEEK, CF/PEEK and GF/PEEK tensile sample
fracture interface at printing speed of 5 mm/s and 25 mm/s. It can be observed from Fig. 12 that the most distinct
feature is rough fractured section with massive voids at higher printing speed of 25 mm/s. As is known, printing
speed refers to the relative moving speed between the printing nozzle and the platform. However, for PEEK and fiber
reinforced PEEK composites with high viscosity, it is not suitable for high-speed printing at a speed over 30 mm/s
such as ABS and PLA.24 Higher printing speed would reduce the extrusion volume of melting materials and lessen
printing stability. Some air mixed into PEEK and composite samples further causing the formation of defects, as
shown in Fig. 12 (a2, b2, c2). Furthermore, the mechanical strength of stacked macromolecule chain dropped with
the increase of printing speed. Conversely, when the printing speed is 5 mm/s, the melting material extruded from
nozzle has sufficient time to weld with surrounding printed component, which improves the comprehensive
performance of fabricated parts.

Fig. 12. SEM of tensile fracture surface of 3D printed PEEK, CF/PEEK and GF/PEEK with different printing
speeds.

3.4. Effects of layer thickness

The tensile strength, flexural strength and impact strength of printed PEEK, CF/PEEK and GF/PEEK using all levels
of layer thicknesses varies from 0.1 mm to 0.3 mm are illustrated in Fig. 13. Increasing layer thickness has an
obvious negative effect on mechanical properties which reach minimum value at layer thickness of 0.3 mm. Besides,
the flexural strength of both printed CF/PEEK and GF/PEEK composites drops by around 14% at most as the layer
thickness increases from 0.1 mm to 0.3 mm. It is found that layers thinner than 0.15 mm can significantly ameliorate
·10 · Chinese Journal of Aeronautics

the flexural strength of fiber reinforce PEEK composites, which exceeds 163 MPa equivalent to that of injection
modeling PEEK.

Fig. 13. Effects of layer thickness on mechanical properties.

The tensile fracture interfaces of PEEK, CF/PEEK and GF/PEEK at layer thickness of 0.1 mm and 0.3 mm are
shown in Fig. 14. When the layer thickness of 0.1 mm, the deposited filaments are squeezed by the nozzle so that the
interlamination are tightly combined, leading to strong bonding strength. Moreover, flat fractured surface after
tensile test can be observed, which filled with few pores as illustrated in Fig. 14 (a1, b1, c1). However, a further rise
in layer thickness after 0.3 mm when using nozzle with diameter of 0.4 mm would result in easier stratification
between layers due to lower squeeze effect caused by nozzle. Clear layer boundary and several pores appear on the
cross section with layer thickness of 0.3 mm, as described in Fig. 14 (a2, b2, c2). In addition, it can be seen from Fig.
14 (b1) that the fiber orientation coincides with printing direction viewed from the fracture surface, which can be
explained by that fibers with the length of 0.2 mm are squeezed by nozzle and distributed along the printing direction
distribution. Furthermore, it can be seen from Fig. 15 that river lines spread along the direction of crack propagation
from the crack tips. However, in the process of fracture failure of fiber reinforced PEEK composites, the strong
pinning effect of fibers effectively inhibits the crack growth and improves the matrix strength.

Fig. 14. SEM of tensile fracture surface of 3D printed PEEK, CF/PEEK and GF/PEEK with different layer
thicknesses.
 Chinese Journal of Aeronautics · 11 ·

Fig. 15. SEM of crack propagation on tensile fracture surface of 3D printed PEEK and 5wt% GF/PEEK with layer
thickness of 0.1 mm.

4. Conclusions

The effects of FDM-3D printing parameters (including nozzle temperature, platform temperature, printing speed and
layer thickness) on tensile properties, flexural properties and impact properties of printed PEEK, CF/PEEK and
GF/PEEK samples were explored. In order to investigate the reasons of materials failure, the tensile fractured
surfaces were observed by scanning electron microscope. The conclusions are given as follows:
(1) The tensile strength and flexural strength of CF/PEEK and GF/PEEK grow with the increase of nozzle
temperature and platform temperature, respectively. However, the impact performance of fiber reinforced PEEK
composites is not obviously influenced by temperature. Nozzle temperature of 440 °C and platform temperature of
280 °C lead to the largest comprehensive mechanical properties of printed CF/PEEK and GF/PEEK. Higher nozzle
temperature makes better melting fluidity and formability of printed materials. Higher platform temperature produces
more energy which improves the infiltration and diffusion among deposited filaments and interlayers. All of these
are beneficial to the improvement of interlayer adhesion and the reduction of internal porosity.
(2) Increasing printing speed and layer thickness has negative effect on all mechanical properties of printed fiber
reinforced PEEK composites. The results show that the printing speed and layer thickness are the crucial printing
parameters affected the impact strength. The optimal mechanical properties are achieved when the printing speed and
layer thickness are 5 mm/s and 0.1 mm respectively. In addition, lower printing speed can modify printing stability
and promote extrusion and adhesion of high viscosity PEEK composites. A thinner layer leads to tightly coalesced
interlamination which was caused by squeeze of nozzle.
(3) Compared with FDM-3D printed pure PEEK, 5wt% CF/PEEK and 5wt% GF/PEEK fabricated by FDM have
higher tensile strength and flexural strength, owning to the strong pinning effect of fibers. However, the impact
property of fiber reinforced PEEK composites was reduced with the addition of fibers, which is due to the
introduction of pores during the process of filament preparation and the degradation of molecular chain properties. In
addition, the tensile strength of CF/PEEK is stronger than that of GF/PEEK, while the bending performance of
GF/PEEK is better, which is determined by the difference of fiber volume content as well as fiber mechanics
characteristic between carbon fiber and glass fiber.

Acknowledgements

This research effort has been supported by Shandong Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of China
(JQ201715), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51575322), Major Program of Shandong Province
Natural Science Foundation of China (ZR2018ZA0401 and ZR2018ZB0521), and Key Research and Development
Program of Shandong Province of China (2019GGX104049).

References

1. Parandoush P, Lin D. A review on additive manufacturing of polymer-fiber composites. Compos Struct 2017; 182:
36-53.
2. Guo P, Zou B, Huang C, et al. Study on microstructure, mechanical properties and machinability of efficiently
additive manufactured AISI 316L stainless steel by high-power direct laser deposition. J Mater Process Tech 2017;
240: 12-22.
3. Xing H, Zou B, Liu X, et al. Effect of particle size distribution on the preparation of ZTA ceramic paste applying
·12 · Chinese Journal of Aeronautics

for stereolithography 3D printing. Powder Technol 2020; 359: 314-22.

4. Xing H, Zou B, Wang X, et al. Fabrication and characterization of SiC whiskers toughened Al2O3 paste for
stereolithography 3D printing applications. J Alloy Compd 2020; 828: 154347.
5. Liu X, Zou B, Xing H, et al. The preparation of ZrO2-Al2O3 composite ceramic by SLA-3D printing and sintering
processing. Ceram Int 2020; 46: 937-44.
6. Li HN, Yang Y, Zhao YJ, et al. On the periodicity of fixed-abrasive planetary lapping based on a generic model. J
Manuf Process 2019; 44: 271-87.
7. Wang YS, Zou B, Wang JC, et al. Effect of the progressive tool wear on surface topography and chip formation in
micro-milling of Ti–6Al–4V using Ti(C7N3)-based cermet micro-mill. Tribol Int 2020; 141: 105900.
8. Zhang XH, Wen DD, Shi ZY, et al. Grinding performance improvement of laser micro-structured silicon nitride
ceramics by laser macro-structured diamond wheels. Ceram Int 2020; 46(1): 795-802.
9. Zhang L, Ji RQ, Fu YF, et al, Tangwarodomnukun V. Investigation on particle motions and resultant impact
erosion on quartz crystals by the micro-particle laden waterjet and airjet. Powder Technol 2020; 360: 452-61.
10. Zhao J, Jiang EY, Qi H, et al. A novel polishing method for single-crystal silicon using the cavitation rotary
abrasive flow. Precis Eng 2020; 61: 72-81.
11. Qi H, Cheng ZC, Cai DH, et al. Experimental study on the improvement of surface integrity of tungsten steel
using acoustic levitation polishing. J Mater Process Tech 2018; 259: 361-7.
12. Zhang XH, Kang ZX, Li S, et al. Grinding force modelling for ductile-brittle transition in laser
macro-micro-structured grinding of zirconia ceramics. Ceram Int 2019; 45(15): 18487-500.
13. Li L, Zheng Y, Yang M, et al. A survey of feature modeling methods: Historical evolution and new development.
Robot Cim-Int Manuf 2020; 61: 101851.
14. Ngo TD, Kashani A, Imbalzano G, et al. Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods,
applications and challenges. Compos Part B-Eng 2018; 143: 172-96.
15. Bellini A, Guceri S. Mechanical characterization of parts fabricated using fused deposition modeling. Rapid
Prototyping J 2003; 9(4): 252-64.
16. Carneiro OS, Silva AF, Gomes R. Fused deposition modeling with polypropylene. Mater Design 2015; 83:
768-76.
17. Liu XH, Zhang MS, Li SP, et al. Mechanical property parametric appraisal of fused deposition modeling parts
based on the gray Taguchi method. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 2017; 89: 2387-97.
18. Popescu D, Zapciu A, Amza C, et al. FDM process parameters influence over the mechanical properties of
polymer specimens: A review. Polym Test 2018; 69: 157-66.
19. Brenken B, Barocio E, Favaloro A, et al. Fused Filament Fabrication of Fiber-Reinforced Polymers: A Review.
Addit Manuf 2018; 21: 1-16.
20. Garcia-Gonzalez D, Rusinek A, Jankowiak T, et al. Mechanical impact behavior of polyether–ether–ketone
(peek). Compos Struct 2015; 124 (4): 88-99.
21. Wang YS, Zou B, Huang CZ. Tool wear mechanisms and micro-channels quality in micro-machining of
Ti-6Al-4V alloy using the Ti(C7N3)-based cermet micro-mills. Tribol Int 2019; 134: 60-76.
22. Wang YS, Zou B, Huang CZ, et al. Feasibility study of the Ti(C7N3)-based cermet micro-mill based on dynamic
fatigue behavior and modeling of the contact stress distribution on the round cutting edge. Int J Mech Sci 2019; 155:
143-58.
23. Yang CC, Tian XY, Li DC, et al. Influence of thermal processing conditions in 3D printing on the crystallinity
and mechanical properties of PEEK material. J Mater Process Tech 2017; 248: 1-7.
24. Wang P, Zou B, Xiao HC, et al. Effects of printing parameters of fused deposition modeling on mechanical
properties, surface quality, and microstructure of PEEK. J Mater Process Tech 2019; 271: 62-74.
25. Ding SL, Zou B, Wang P, et al. Effects of nozzle temperature and building orientation on mechanical properties
and microstructure of PEEK and PEI printed by 3D-FDM. Polym Test 2019; 78: 105948.
26. Zhong W, Li F, Zhang Z, et al. Short fiber reinforced composites for fused deposition modeling. Mat Sci Eng
A-Struct 2001; 301: 125-30.
27. Tekinalp HL, Kunc V, Velez-Garcia GM, et al. Highly oriented carbon fiber–polymer composites via additive
manufacturing. Compos Sci Technol 2014; 105: 144-50.
28. Sang L, Han S, Li Z, et al. Development of short basalt fiber reinforced polylactide composites and their feasible
evaluation for 3D printing applications. Compos Part B-Eng 2019; 164: 629-39.
29. Ning F, Cong W, Hu Z, et al. Additive manufacturing of thermoplastic matrix composites using fused deposition
modeling: A comparison of two reinforcements. J Compos Mater 2017; 51: 3733-42.
30. Ning F, Cong W, Hu Y, et al. Additive manufacturing of carbon fiber-reinforced plastic composites using fused
deposition modeling: Effects of process parameters on tensile properties. J Compos Mater 2017; 51(4): 451-62.
31. Ning F, Cong W, Qiu J, et al. Additive manufacturing of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites using
fused deposition modeling. Compos Part B-Eng 2015; 80: 369-78.
 Chinese Journal of Aeronautics · 13 ·

32. Stepashkin AA, Chukov DI, Senatov FS, et al. 3D-printed PEEK-Carbon Fiber (CF) composites: Structure and
thermal properties. Compos Sci Technol 2018; 164: 319-26.
33. Li Q, Zhao W, Li Y, et al. Flexural Properties and Fracture Behavior of CF/PEEK in Orthogonal Building
Orientation by FDM: Microstructure and Mechanism. Polymers 2019; 11(4): 656.
34. Rinaldi M, Ghidini T, Cecchini F, et al. Additive layer manufacturing of poly (ether ether ketone) via FDM.
Compos Part B-Eng 2018; 145: 162-72.
35. Wang P, Zou B, Ding SL. Modeling of surface roughness based on heat transfer considering diffusion among
deposition filaments for FDM 3D printing heat-resistant resin. Appl Therm Eng 2019; 161: 114064.
36. Xie Y, Hill CAS, Xiao Z, et al. Silane coupling agents used for natural fiber/polymer composites: A review.
Compos Part A-Appl S 2010; 41(7): 806-19.
37. Liu L, Jia C, He J, et al. Interfacial characterization, control and modification of carbon fiber reinforced polymer
composites. Compos Sci Technol 2015; 121: 56-72.
38. Bismarck A, Kumru ME, Song B, et al. Study on surface and mechanical fiber characteristics and their effect on
the adhesion properties to a polycarbonate matrix tuned by anodic carbon fiber oxidation. Compos Part A-Appl S
1999; 30(12): 1351-66.

Declaration of Interest Statement

We declare that we have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships

that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Authors: Peng Wang; Bin Zou*; Shouling Ding; Lei Li**; Chuanzhen Huang.

*Corresponding author: Bin Zou, E-mail: cajetzb@163.com

**Co-corresponding author: Lei Li, E-mail: lei_li@sdu.edu.cn