Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NAACP's Response To Motion of Bondurant Currie, and Stevens To Intervene (NAACP V Haley Barbour, Et Al)
NAACP's Response To Motion of Bondurant Currie, and Stevens To Intervene (NAACP V Haley Barbour, Et Al)
AND
COME NOW the plaintiffs, the Mississippi State Conference of the National Association for
the Advancement of Colored People (“NAACP”), Thomas Plunkett, Rod Woullard, and Hollis
1
Case 3:11-cv-00159-TSL -EGJ -LG Document 78 Filed 04/21/11 Page 2 of 3
Watkins, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,1 and file this their response to the
motion of Sidney Bondurant (“Boundurant”), Becky Currie (“Currie”), and Mary Ann Stevens
1. Plaintiffs do not oppose this motion to intervene for the same reasons stated in
Respectfully submitted,
MISSISSIPPI STATE CONFERENCE OF THE
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE
ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE,
THOMAS PLUNKETT, ROD WOULLARD,
and HOLLIS WATKINS, on behalf of
themselves and all others similarly situated
1
Plaintiffs filed the case as a class action. However, plaintiffs have not filed a formal
motion for class certification yet.
2
Case 3:11-cv-00159-TSL -EGJ -LG Document 78 Filed 04/21/11 Page 3 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Carroll Rhodes, do hereby certify that I have this date electronically filed the foregoing
Response to the Motion to Intervene with the Clerk of Court using the ECF system which sent
notification of such filing to the following: