Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Design Methodology For A Salt Gradient Solar Pond Coupled With An Evaporation Pond
Design Methodology For A Salt Gradient Solar Pond Coupled With An Evaporation Pond
net/publication/232375094
CITATIONS READS
28 876
3 authors:
Abdulghani Ramadan
Faculty of Engineering - El-Mergib University
22 PUBLICATIONS 68 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
This was part of a work done at the Center for Solar Energy Studies in Libya View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Abdulghani Ramadan on 27 February 2020.
Communicated by TY NEWELL
Abstract—This paper presents the results of a simple mathematical model for predicting the ratio of the
evaporation pond (EP) area to that of a Salt Gradient Solar Pond (SGSP) area. The EP idea provides a very
attractive method of salt recycling by evaporation, especially in areas of high rates of evaporation and low
rates of rain as it is the case for North Africa. The model is applied for two types of surface water flushing
(fresh water and seawater) under the prevailing conditions of Tripoli-Libya (Lat. 5 32.688N) and for measured
evaporation rates. Under the summer conditions and for the case of surface flushing by fresh water, the area
ratio was estimated at about 0.17. While for the case of using seawater this ratio increases enormously to about
14.4. The time required for the salt concentration to increase from seawater concentration to a high
concentrated brine, which can be injected at the bottom of the solar pond, is also presented. It was estimated
that the time required to increase the salt concentration from 3.5 to 35% is about 120 to 250 days during the
summer months and about 200 to 220 days during the winter months. 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All
rights reserved.
447
448 K. R. Agha et al.
precipitation, and therefore recycling of salt by pond, fully equipped with systems to monitor all
evaporation is practical and economical. relevant parameters, is designed as an experimen-
This, in addition, overcomes the salt shortage tal facility enabling the investigation of various
problem and ensures the continuous high per- aspects of pond performance.
formance operation of solar ponds with a mini-
mum environmental damage caused by salt dis-
3. COUPLING THE SGSP AND EP
posal. Based on the above considerations, it is felt
essential to demonstrate the capability of a long Fig. 1 shows a schematic diagram of a SGSP
term, closed cycle salt management facility by coupled to an EP. To estimate the required
evaporative brine concentration, which is the topic evaporation pond area that will provide the
dealt within this paper. quantity of salt required for the maintenance of
The current study has been performed to de- salt concentration profile in the SGSP, the mass
termine the relationship between the area ratio balance model presented by Alagao et al. (1994)
(ratio between the EP area and SGSP area) and and Batty et al. (1987) was used in this study.
some parameters known to affect the thermal In order to operate the pond effectively, it is
stability of the SGSP. The relative monthly quan- important to know the time required to substitute
tities of flushing water at the surface and those of for the removed surface brine (from SGSP) by the
high salt concentration to be injected at the brine that has to be injected at the bottom of the
bottom were also presented. For the effective SGSP. The hourly variation of temperature and
operation of the system coupling the SGSP and concentration of the brine in the EP is of
EP, the transient brine re-concentration phenom- paramount importance in accounting for the loss
ena were discussed. of energy from the LCZ. An energy balance
The paper also presents the design, construction model (Newell et al., 1994) was used to predict
and the method used in the establishment of salt this time with a little modification to the terms
concentration profile of Tajoura’s Experimental representing the sky radiation and evaporation
Solar Pond (TESP). energy. The model used in this study becomes as
follows:
2. TAJOURA’S EXPERIMENTAL SOLAR POND dT
mCP ] 5 tA ep Is h r A ep [T 2 T sky ]
(TESP) dt
2 h c A ep [T 2 T a ] 2 aep Efw Lrw
TESP is an artificial solar pond located to the
east of Tripoli and is designed and constructed, in The term on the left-hand side represents the
joint cooperation with a Swiss company, with energy stored in the body of the evaporation pond.
SGSP surface area of about 830 m 2 and EP area The first term on the right-hand side represents
of about 105 m 2 . the solar energy penetrating the surface of the
The salt concentration profile is constructed evaporation pond. The last three terms represent
with three zones, the Upper Convective Zone the energy losses by radiation, convection and
(UCZ) of 0.30 m thickness and a salt concen- evaporation, respectively.
tration of about 41 kg / m 3 , the Lower Convective
Zone (LCZ) of 1 m thickness and salt concen-
4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
tration of 260 kg / m 3 . Separating these two zones
is the Non-Convective Zone (NCZ) of 1.2 m The mathematical model described above was
thickness and variable salt concentration. The applied by using the prevailing weather conditions
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of SGSP/ EP system showing the various mass and energy balance components.
Design methodology for a salt gradient solar pond coupled with an evaporation pond 449
Fig. 2. Monthly average measured weather data for Tripoli-Libya Lat. (32.688N) over 30-year period (1961–1990).
in Tripoli-Libya (Lat. 32.688N) shown in Fig. 2, flushing. The winter design was excluded because
averaged over a 30-year period (1961–1990). Fig. of its low rate of net evaporation † from the
2 clearly shows the high rates of net evaporation evaporation pond. These results show that large
and therefore the practical viability of evaporation area evaporation ponds are needed if seawater is
ponds, also compares the measured evaporation used for surface flushing, as higher quantities of
rates with those calculated. seawater are required to wash the surface of the
Fig. 3a and b show the effect of ambient air SGSP compared with those quantities of fresh
temperature on the evaporation rates from both water. It can also be seen that the summer design
fresh water and evaporation pond water (con- conditions resulted in the smallest area ratio, due
centration 26%), respectively; for various values to the high rates of net evaporation during the
of surface water temperatures. It is shown that as season as depicted in Fig. 2.
the ambient air temperature increases, the evapo- A further investigation of the effect of the
ration rates increase. This is quite obvious since prevailing conditions at the design stage for
the air temperature at constant relative humidity various cases is shown in Fig. 4. These figures
works as a driving force for evaporation. The show a graphical presentation of the effect of
effect could be further manifested by the plots of various parameters on the area ratio for Summer,
the resulting evaporation rates for different sur- Autumn, and Spring, respectively. The parameters
face water temperatures, as shown on the same analyzed in the figure are the net evaporation
diagram. Again, the higher the water temperature, from the evaporation pond, the type of water used
the higher the evaporation rate. Changes in am- for surface flushing and the rate of salt diffusion.
bient air temperature does not seem to affect the In the case of fresh water surface flushing, the
value of aep which represents the ratio of evapora- resulting evaporation does not contribute to the
tion from the evaporation pond to that from fresh increase of concentration in the evaporation.
water. This is attributed to the fact that the Similar results are obtained for Summer, Autumn
evaporation pond has a very high salt content and Spring designs as shown in Fig. 4a–c,
(26%). respectively, when fresh water is used for surface
Owing to the intermittent nature of solar flushing. In other words, in the case of fresh water
energy, solar energy systems will have to be sized surface flushing, the quantity of water evaporated
according to a pre-specified time. For this pur- is equal to the decrease in the quantity of brine
pose, Table 1 shows the required area ratios under
the prevailing conditions in Tripoli for different †
Net evaporation rate is defined as the evaporation rate minus
design conditions and both types of surface water the precipitation rate.
450 K. R. Agha et al.
Fig. 3. (a) The effect of ambient air temperature of Efw for different surface temperatures: (b) The effect of ambient air
temperature on aep for different surface temperatures.
flushed with a corresponding change in salt replace evaporation losses and flush away the salt
concentration from C2 to C3. diffusing to the surface from the concentrated
brines below.
4.1. Applying the model to TESP Fig. 5a shows the predicted quantity of salt
As mentioned earlier, for the purpose of high provided by the EP each month as compared to
performance operation of solar ponds, it is im- that required by the SGSP (A SP 5830 m 2 ) under
portant to keep the pond thermally stable. This the prevailing conditions, for different design
requires the injection of high salt concentration scenarios with measured evaporation rates for the
brine at the bottom to compensate for the natural case of fresh water surface flushing. Fig. 5b
diffusion of salts upwards, it also requires wash- compares the same quantities when seawater is
ing the surface with low concentration water to used for surface flushing.
Fig. 6 shows monthly quantities of salt that can
be provided by the constructed evaporation pond
Table 1. Estimated area ratios under different design parame-
ters (105 m 2 ) and (1.5 m) depth at the TESP project
Area ratio, A r compared with that required by the SGSP
Fresh water Seawater (830 m 2 ). It is clearly shown that the EP area was
rather underestimated even if fresh water is used
Spring 0.65 28.40
Summer 0.17 14.40 for surface flushing. The quantity of salt required
Autumn 0.32 20.20 by SGSP to maintain its salt concentration profile
TESP Project 0.13 ‘Constructed’ was estimated at about 1150 kg / month
Design methodology for a salt gradient solar pond coupled with an evaporation pond 451
Fig. 4. The variation of Area ratio (A r ) with net evaporation rate from EP for both types of surface water flushing and different
salt transport rates.
(16.6 kg / m 2 –year), which could be under-esti- required for fresh water flushing and that for
mated compared to previous studies (Alagao et seawater flushing. This comes as a result of the
al., 1994; Swift and Golding, 1992). fact that in addition to replacing the evaporation
Fig. 7 shows the quantity of water in losses, washing the surface is expected to flush
(m 3 / month) required for surface flushing using away salt diffusing to the surface from the
fresh water and seawater flushing with measured concentrated brines below.
evaporation rates. This graph clearly shows the Fig. 8 shows the required time for the con-
large quantities of flushing water required during centration in an EP to reach (35%) starting from
the summer, which is attributed to the high rates sea water (3.5%) under different prevailing con-
of evaporation in the summer season. It also ditions. It is clearly shown that the shortest period
shows the big differences between the quantities for the increase of concentration occurs during the
452 K. R. Agha et al.
Fig. 5. Mass of salt provided by the EP as compared to that required by the SGSP of TESP (A SP 5830 m 2 ) under different
scenarios.
summer months. This is attributed to the high net as shown in Fig. 9 could further manifest the
evaporation rates in the summer season. brine re-concentration phenomena. The figure also
Presenting the daily amounts of concentration shows the daily decrease in brine depth that
Fig. 6. Mass of salt provided and required by the TESP (Constructed pond), It should be noted that for the case of seawater
surface flushing the real quantity of salt is equal to the shown values divided by ten. (A ep 5105 m 2 , Depth51.5 m)
(A sp 5830 m 2 ).
Design methodology for a salt gradient solar pond coupled with an evaporation pond 453
Fig. 7. The quantity of water required for surface flushing in (m 3 / month) for TESP.
Fig. 8. The time required (in days) to increase the salt concentration from seawater concentration (3.5%) to (35%) for different
starting months for the TESP, and the temperature of brine and ambient at the last day.
corresponds to the daily increase in concentration. high concentration brine (at the last day of
It should be noted that the results given in Figs. 8 different starting months). It can be seen from this
and 9 are based on the assumption that no figure that the maximum temperature of the
withdrawal or feeding to EP has occurred once concentrated brine occurs at about (2:30 p.m.) of
it’s started. the last day, which is the preferred time to inject
In order to operate the SGSP effectively and the concentrated brine from EP to SGSP.
minimize the energy losses during the high con-
centration injection, it is important to use the
5. CONCLUSIONS
highest possible temperature for the brine to be
injected. Fig. 10 is constructed for this purpose, it A mathematical model describing the relation-
shows the hourly temperature variation of the ships between the evaporation pond and the salt
Fig. 9. The daily variation of brine concentration and depth in the evaporation pond of TESP.
454 K. R. Agha et al.
Fig. 10. The temperature variation of the available high concentration brine (35%) at the last day of different starting months for
TESP.
gradient solar pond with the associated stability and from EP (m / period)
hr Radiative heat transfer coefficient (W/
parameters has been presented.
m 2 8C)
Considering the results of this model for each hc Convective heat transfer coefficient (W/
set of circumstances, the following conclusions m 2 8C)
were drawn: Isolar,sp Isolar,ep Incident solar radiation on the surface of
1. Salt re-concentration by evaporation can be an the solar pond and that of EP
L Latent heat of vaporization
effective method of providing salt to the main
M Mass of brine to be evaporated (kg)
solar ponds. Q1, Q2 & Q 3 Quantities of water used for surface
2. The time required to increase the salt con- flushing, over flow to the EP, and satu-
centration from seawater (3.5–35%) was esti- rated brine injection to the SGSP (m 3 /
mated to be about 120–250 days during the period)
R sp , R ep Precipitation rates, into solar pond, into
summer months and about 200–220 days
evaporation pond (m / period)
during the winter months. SGSP Salt gradient solar pond
3. The salt concentration of water used for sur- ST Salt transport (kg / m 2 —period)
face flushing significantly affects the area TESP Tajoura’s experimental solar pond
ratios and the quantities of water used for T Temperature (8C)
T Time (period)
surface flushing.
T a ,T sky Ambient air temperature and sky tem-
4. The best time for high concentration brine perature (8C)
injection to the SGSP was estimated at about aep Ratio of evaporation from EP to that
(2:30 p.m.) to insure minimum thermal energy from fresh water (aep 5 Eep /Efw )
losses from the storage zone. rw Density of fresh water
5. Because of the low rates of net evaporation t Transmissivity of water surface