CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 1

Grant Sane 20672206

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________

Master of Education in Special Education

PROGRAM: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

SPD-590 8/5/2021 11/17/2021

COURSE: _____________________________________________________ START DATE: ____________________________ END DATE: _____________________

Dalton High School

COOPERATING SCHOOL NAME: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Georgia
SCHOOL STATE: ___________________________________

Amy Mayfield
COOPERATING TEACHER/MENTOR NAME: _______________________________________________________________________________________________

Olevia Perry
GCU FACULTY SUPERVISOR NAME: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________

FOR COURSE INSTRUCTORS ONLY:

EVALUATION 1 TOTAL
POINTS 94.44 points 94.44 %
9.00 900 850 100
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0
100
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 1

Grant Sane 20672206

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________

GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide

No Evidence
(The GCU Faculty
Supervisor should create a
plan with the Teacher
Candidate to determine how
the Teacher Candidate will
meet this disposition in
future evaluations)
No Evidence
There is no evidence that the
performance of the Teacher
Candidate met this
disposition or expectations
for a Teacher Candidate
during student teaching.
Ineffective
(Teacher Candidates within
this range require a
Professional Growth Plan)
1 to 49
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
insufficient in meeting this
disposition and expectations
for a Teacher Candidate
during student teaching.
Foundational
(Teacher Candidates within
this range require a
Professional Growth Plan)
50 to 69
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
underdeveloped in meeting
this disposition and
expectations for a Teacher
Candidate during student
teaching.
Emerging
(Teacher Candidates within
this range may benefit from a
Professional Growth Plan)
70 to 79
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
developing in meeting this
disposition and expectations for
a Teacher Candidate during
student teaching.
Proficient
(Target level for Teacher
Candidates)
80 to 92
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate meets
this disposition and
expectations for a Teacher
Candidate during student
teaching.
Distinguished
(Usually reserved for master
Teacher Candidates)
93 to 100
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate
consistently exceeds this
disposition and all
expectations for a Teacher
Candidate during student
teaching.

High Expectations Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates should believe that all students could learn and should set and support realistic expectations for student success. 1.00
These expectations should be communicated in positive ways. 95
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Mr. Sane, you worked to engage all students and created positive interactions. Communicate expectations to the class on a consistent basis. Research and find ways to incorporate several
learning strategies to support student learning. It is a good idea to post your expectations and agenda for the class. Make use of available resources such as PowerPoint and mini video clips to
reinforce learning. You did a good job of providing support during instruction by monitoring student activity, stopping along the way to check for understanding and asking if students had
questions.
Respect for the Diversity of Others Score No Evidence
Teacher candidates should be sensitive to individual learning and the social needs of students and embrace the cultural diversity of
the community. They should develop and maintain educational communities marked by respect for others. They should interact
with their students, fellow educators, administrators, parents, and other community members with courtesy and civility and 95 1.00
establish relationships characterized by respect and rapport.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
You demonstrate general respect for all students by listening to their responses and communicating in a respectful and professional manner.
 CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 1

Grant Sane 20672206

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________

GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide

No Evidence
(The GCU Faculty
Supervisor should create a
plan with the Teacher
Candidate to determine how
the Teacher Candidate will
meet this disposition in
future evaluations)
No Evidence
There is no evidence that the
performance of the Teacher
Candidate met this
disposition or expectations
for a Teacher Candidate
during student teaching.
Ineffective
(Teacher Candidates within
this range require a
Professional Growth Plan)
1 to 49
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
insufficient in meeting this
disposition and expectations
for a Teacher Candidate
during student teaching.
Foundational
(Teacher Candidates within
this range require a
Professional Growth Plan)
50 to 69
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
underdeveloped in meeting
this disposition and
expectations for a Teacher
Candidate during student
teaching.
Emerging
(Teacher Candidates within
this range may benefit from a
Professional Growth Plan)
70 to 79
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
developing in meeting this
disposition and expectations for
a Teacher Candidate during
student teaching.
Proficient
(Target level for Teacher
Candidates)
80 to 92
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate meets
this disposition and
expectations for a Teacher
Candidate during student
teaching.
Distinguished
(Usually reserved for master
Teacher Candidates)
93 to 100
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate
consistently exceeds this
disposition and all
expectations for a Teacher
Candidate during student
teaching.

Fairness Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates should promote social justice and equity, maintain appropriate standards of confidentiality, and exercise
fairness in all areas including assessment. 95 1.00
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
You model listening and respect others’ opinions and ideas. To this point you have demonstrated appropriate standards of confidentiality when working with students. Ensure that you make class
expectations clear so that all students can be held to the same rules.

Professional Conduct Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates should exercise sound judgment and ethical behavior. They should be a positive role model within their
community. 95
Evidence 1.00
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
You have demonstrated professional conduct in your actions. You have followed the guidelines for all teachers in the building, following the policies of the district outlined for teachers. Continue to
maintain a kind and positive demeanor.
 CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 1

Grant Sane 20672206

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________

GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide

No Evidence
(The GCU Faculty
Supervisor should create a
plan with the Teacher
Candidate to determine how
the Teacher Candidate will
meet this disposition in
future evaluations)
No Evidence
There is no evidence that the
performance of the Teacher
Candidate met this
disposition or expectations
for a Teacher Candidate
during student teaching.
Ineffective
(Teacher Candidates within
this range require a
Professional Growth Plan)
1 to 49
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
insufficient in meeting this
disposition and expectations
for a Teacher Candidate
during student teaching.
Foundational
(Teacher Candidates within
this range require a
Professional Growth Plan)
50 to 69
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
underdeveloped in meeting
this disposition and
expectations for a Teacher
Candidate during student
teaching.
Emerging
(Teacher Candidates within
this range may benefit from a
Professional Growth Plan)
70 to 79
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
developing in meeting this
disposition and expectations for
a Teacher Candidate during
student teaching.
Proficient
(Target level for Teacher
Candidates)
80 to 92
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate meets
this disposition and
expectations for a Teacher
Candidate during student
teaching.
Distinguished
(Usually reserved for master
Teacher Candidates)
93 to 100
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate
consistently exceeds this 1.00
disposition and all
expectations for a Teacher
Candidate during student
teaching.

Reflection Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates should recognize that reflection combined with experience leads to growth as a professional. Educators should
be thoughtful about their professional practice, critically examine it, and seek continual improvement. 95
Evidence
((The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
You completed your self-evaluation identifying your strengths and weaknesses. Continue this practice to analyze your strengths and weaknesses as they pertain to lesson planning and delivery
regularly to gauge your own growth, adjusting as necessary. You appear receptive to feedback from your cooperating teacher and site supervisor.

Curiosity Score No Evidence 1.00

Teacher candidates should promote and support curiosity and encourage active inquiry.
92
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
You give ample wait time for students to comprehend questions and respond. Incorporate more open-ended higher order thinking questions throughout instruction. Incorporate more activities to vary
your teaching style.
 CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 1

Grant Sane 20672206

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________

GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide

No Evidence
(The GCU Faculty
Supervisor should create a
plan with the Teacher
Candidate to determine how
the Teacher Candidate will
meet this disposition in
future evaluations)
No Evidence
There is no evidence that the
performance of the Teacher
Candidate met this
disposition or expectations
for a Teacher Candidate
during student teaching.
Ineffective
(Teacher Candidates within
this range require a
Professional Growth Plan)
1 to 49
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
insufficient in meeting this
disposition and expectations
for a Teacher Candidate
during student teaching.
Foundational
(Teacher Candidates within
this range require a
Professional Growth Plan)
50 to 69
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
underdeveloped in meeting
this disposition and
expectations for a Teacher
Candidate during student
teaching.
Emerging
(Teacher Candidates within
this range may benefit from a
Professional Growth Plan)
70 to 79
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
developing in meeting this
disposition and expectations for
a Teacher Candidate during
student teaching.
Proficient
(Target level for Teacher
Candidates)
80 to 92
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate meets
this disposition and
expectations for a Teacher
Candidate during student
teaching.
Distinguished
(Usually reserved for master
Teacher Candidates)
93 to 100
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate
consistently exceeds this
disposition and all
expectations for a Teacher
Candidate during student
teaching.

Honesty Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates should model integrity by their words and actions.
95 1.00

Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
You have demonstrated honesty in your teaching responsibilities. Work on completing tasks and requests in a timely manner.

Compassion Score No Evidence 1.00

Teacher candidates should demonstrate professional friendliness, warmth, and genuine caring in their relationships with others
while providing intellectual, emotional, and spiritual support. 93
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
You have demonstrated compassion toward students by actively listening and answering their questions. You offer some praise. Work on incorporating more in your instruction. Continue to work on
providing engaging and interactive lessons.
 CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 1

Grant Sane 20672206

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________

GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide

No Evidence
(The GCU Faculty
Supervisor should create a
plan with the Teacher
Candidate to determine how
the Teacher Candidate will
meet this disposition in
future evaluations)
No Evidence
There is no evidence that the
performance of the Teacher
Candidate met this
disposition or expectations
for a Teacher Candidate
during student teaching.
Ineffective
(Teacher Candidates within
this range require a
Professional Growth Plan)
1 to 49
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
insufficient in meeting this
disposition and expectations
for a Teacher Candidate
during student teaching.
Foundational
(Teacher Candidates within
this range require a
Professional Growth Plan)
50 to 69
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
underdeveloped in meeting
this disposition and
expectations for a Teacher
Candidate during student
teaching.
Emerging
(Teacher Candidates within
this range may benefit from a
Professional Growth Plan)
70 to 79
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
developing in meeting this
disposition and expectations for
a Teacher Candidate during
student teaching.
Proficient
(Target level for Teacher
Candidates)
80 to 92
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate meets
this disposition and
expectations for a Teacher
Candidate during student
teaching.
Distinguished
(Usually reserved for master
Teacher Candidates)
93 to 100
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate
consistently exceeds this
disposition and all
expectations for a Teacher
Candidate during student
teaching.

Advocacy Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates understand the impact of community involvement and servant leadership as it applies to the welfare of others in
the educational setting. ✔ 0.00

Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )

Dedication Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates should be committed to the profession of teaching and learning.
95
1.00
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
You have demonstrated dedication to this point by being present and prepared for the day. You receive feedback and appear to be receptive to implement and modify instruction as needed.
Continue to engage in reflective practice to improve your craft.
 CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 1

Grant Sane 20672206

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________

INSTRUCTIONS
Please review the "Total Scored Percentage" for accuracy and add any attachments before completing the "Agreement and Signature" section.

Total Scored Percentage:

94.44 %
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1:
(Optional)

Attachment 2:
(Optional)

AGREEMENT AND SIGNATURE

This evaluation reflects the results of a collaborative conference including feedback from the Cooperating / Mentor Teacher. The GCU Faculty
Supervisor and Cooperating /Mentor Teacher should collaboratively review the performance in each category prior to the evaluation meeting.

I attest this submission is accurate, true, and in compliance with GCU policy guidelines, to the best of my ability to do so.

GCU Faculty Supervisor E-Signature Date

Olevia Perry
Olevia Perry (Sep 3, 2021 08:47 CDT) Sep 3, 2021