Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Treatment of Patients With A Congenital Transversal Vag - 2009 - Journal of Pedi
Treatment of Patients With A Congenital Transversal Vag - 2009 - Journal of Pedi
Treatment of Patients With A Congenital Transversal Vag - 2009 - Journal of Pedi
Original Study
Abstract. Study Objective: The aim of this study is to de- after surgery in patients with a thick transversal vaginal
scribe the different modalities of congenital obstructing septum or a partial vaginal aplasia.
vaginal malformations and the evaluation of techniques to
solve the problem.
Design: A retrospective study. Key Words. Vaginal septum—Vaginal aplasia—
Setting: The University Hospital Nijmegen, the Pull-through technique—Push-through technique—
Netherlands.
Mold treatment
Participants: The medical records of 18 patients with
congenital obstructive malformations of the vagina oper-
ated on by one gynecologist were retrospectively reviewed.
The conditions were classified in three groups: group I with
one uterus and vagina and with a transverse vaginal septum,
Introduction
group II with a partial vaginal agenesis and group III with
a double genital system and a septum with occlusion of one Congenital obstructing vaginal malformations arrest
vagina. the outflow of menstrual blood and cause hematocol-
Main outcome measures: Operating technique used, pos, possible hematometra and hematosalpinges.
mold treatment after surgery, menstruation outflow, the pos- Incomplete occlusion of the vagina in a double genital
sibility of having intercourse and the need for additional system can lead to retention of secretions, vaginal dis-
surgery. charge, pain in the lower abdomen or complaints at
Results: 18 patients were evaluated. Of 10 patients in intercourse. These obstructing anomalies are either
group I, 8 patients were treated with the pull-through tech- longitudinal or transverse in origin.1 The longitudinal
nique and 2 patients with the push-through technique. Four
vaginal septum is caused by incomplete disappear-
of the patients with a pull-through operation did not get
mold treatment; of these patients, 3 needed repeat surgery
ance of the partition between the fused Müllerian
because of the tendency for constriction. Of 4 patients in ducts. The transverse vaginal septum is the result of
group II, 1 patient was treated with the pull-through tech- failure of absorption of the tissue between the vaginal
nique and 3 with the push-through technique. The patient plate and the caudal end of the fused Müllerian ducts.2
with the pull-through technique needed repeat surgery It may be located in the lower, middle, or upper part
because of constriction. There was no mold treatment after of the vagina. Gynecological examination and ultraso-
the first procedure. Group III were 4 patients all treated nography will often reveal the diagnosis. High trans-
with the pull-through technique. None of them received verse septa can be confused with partial aplasia of
mold treatment, and none of these patients needed repeat the vagina. MRI is a reliable method for evaluating
surgery. the anomaly especially in a patient with a doubtful di-
Conclusions: The push-through method is a good surgi-
agnosis. When the congenital vaginal occlusion had
cal technique for the patients in whom problems of con-
striction after surgery are expected and for patients with
a thickness of less than 1 cm, we called it a septum.
difficulties during surgery. Mold treatment is recommended When the occlusion more than 1 cm in thickness, it
was called a partial aplasia of the vagina. The MRI
can be helpful for planning surgical treatment, but
Address correspondence to: Chantal van Bijsterveldt, MD, Dept should be reserved for more complex cases.3 With
Ob Gyn, UMCN St Radboud, PO Box 9101 6500 HB Nijmegen, the MRI, the thickness of a vaginal septum can be
The Netherlands; E-mail: chant1@hotmail.com measured, as well as, in the case of a partial vaginal
Ó 2009 North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology 1083-3188/09/$36.00
Published by Elsevier Inc. doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2008.02.008
158 van Bijsterveldt et al: Treatment of Congenital Transversal Vaginal Septum or Partial Vaginal Aplasia
Group III: double system with a vaginal septum tendency of constriction. The patient had 3 months
4 patients with a good outcome with the pull-through of mold treatment after second procedure.
technique without mold treatment, no re-excision The other patients, who received mold treatment
needed. after their first surgery, used the mold 2 months to 1
Four patients did not get mold treatment after the year in one case. Patients who had intravaginal inter-
first surgery but needed repeat surgery after a few course regularly and soon after surgery needed mold
months because of the tendency of constriction. All treatment during a shorter time than the patients
four had a good outcome after mold treatment follow- who did not have intravaginal intercourse on a regular
ing the second procedure. basis. All patients had a good outcome.
Group I: one uterus and one vagina with Group I: one uterus and one vagina with
a transverse vaginal septum a transverse vaginal septum
Two patients with the pull-through technique plus one Two patients with the pull-through technique, 2 and 6
patient with the push-through technique without mold months of mold treatment, respectively. 1 patient with
treatment, needed re-excision because of tendency of the push-through technique and 2 months of mold
constriction. treatment.
All three patients used mold treatment for 6 weeks
after second procedure. Group II: partial vaginal agenesis
Two patients with the push-through technique, 2
Group II: partial vaginal agenesis months and 1 year of mold treatment.
one patient with the pull-through technique without In the five cases in which the push-through
mold treatment needed re-excision because of technique was used, the mold treatment lasted
160 van Bijsterveldt et al: Treatment of Congenital Transversal Vaginal Septum or Partial Vaginal Aplasia
Pull-through 13 8 1 4
Push-through 5 2 3 0
Repeat surgery 4 3 1 0
after few months
Group I: One uterus and one vagina with a transverse vaginal septum.
Group II: Partial vaginal agenesis.
Group III: Double system with a vaginal septum.