Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Labor Law Review
Labor Law Review
GENERAL PRINCIPLES
a. Legal Basis
1. Constitution
-heavily based on constitutional provisions because most of the labor law
provisions do not come naturally, they come from the state. Thus consti is the main
basis.
-Very important is the social justice;
-another is constitutional grant of full protection to labor; the full protection
include overseas employment.
-labor is identified as a primary social economic force. Legally, it recognizes labor as
also vital part of economy not only capital.
-Right to self organization. State protects right of employees to form organization to
protect themselves and bargain with their employer not just as an individual but as a
group.
-Due process. Labor is a property right. Thus cannot be deprived of labor without
due process.
-Security of Tenure. Pursuant to due process.
-These provisions are not self-executing. Thus, there should be an enabling law.
Thus, the executing laws are LABOR CODE and CIVIL CODE.
-Art. 1700 The relation of employer and employee are impressed with public
interest. Thus, it is a contract which is governed by the state
-Pursuant to police power of state. It exercises police power because it intervenes with
the use of property or liberty or parties, as to how employer will act on erring
employees, or how it should exercise its power. Such is to protect common good.
-Pursuant to Social Justice. Labor laws are based on social justice. Such principle states
that labor has a value. When SJ is basis, such does not give a blanket to underprivileged
to commit something wrong. It simply mitigates the effect of a harsh law to the
underprivileged. At the same time, you should not use social justice paringly,
2. Civil Code
-see art. 1700
3. Labor Code
-promulgated in 1974,
-Codified labor laws
-amended
-has declarations of policy (see the different of Labor Code policies and policies in
Consti):
-Purpose of Social Legislation-Labor laws gives life to the principles provided in the
consti
-Basis is Social Justice, because state recognized that (1)employer is more powerful than
employee, thus such provision, makes them equal. Another reason is there are greater supply
of labor, thus, if (2)there is a greater supply, of laborers, the employers will easily terminate its
employees and can hire from the large amount of willing to be employed.
-This is based on the labor code and civil code, stating that, in case of doubt, the interpretation
should be in favor of the labor. In addition, it should
-DOLE (Art. 5)
-Issues:
That is why laws cannot keep up with this complexity, thus DOLE is given such policy-making
power to enact regulations which still is pursuant to the enacted labor laws.
-example is the laws on work from home. Since it is pandemic, DOLE provide regulations
pursuant to existing complexity.
-On contractualization, what governs is D.O. No. 174 s. 2017 which is the only provision
regulated contractualization
Applicability of Labor Code
--Applies to Agricultural and non-Agricultural workers, industrial or commercial for profit or not
1. Gov’t Employees- refers to all employees of gov’t three branches and its subdivisions
2. GOCC w/ original charter
Gov’t employees, may also organize even if they are not under labor law, but cannot form
UNIONS, thus, they cannot enter in a CBA or enter into strike, but they can appeal to
government for better employment benefits.
Medical frontliners, threatening to make mass resignation, it is valid. But if they will strike, it is
not valid.
-employees of International orgs. Because they are covered under treaty obligations and
pursuant to unsuitability of state and international organizations.(e.g. World Health Org.)
-Employees of water districts are not covered, they are created by P.D.198 a special law. Thus
civil service law governs.
-Corporate officers are not governed. (e.g. President, corporate secretary, treasurer and BOD
or BOT) because they are not employees but officers, they are not receiving wages they are
only receiving allowances and per diems.
-if you are removed as a corporate officer, do not file illegal termination case, their remedy is to
file complaint with the SPECIAL CORPORATE COURT under R.A. 8799 it is the RTC because this is
an INTRA-CORPORATE DISPUTE
Other officers, aside from president, corporate sec or treasurer, as provided in the Corpo Code.
you are considered as regular employee. (example, if you are CEO or Vice Pres, you are
considered as mere employee
-General rule is that the basic standard is employees are directly hired by employers.
-Except those employments allowed by law for recruitment and placements (e.g. PESO, private
recruitment entities created through the requirements provided by law, shipping or manning
agencies for sea workers, government agencies such as POEA, Construction companies may
recruit if allowed by DOLE, members of the diplomatic corps)
-POEA is an admin agency implementing rules and monitoring Overseas Employment Workers;
they come up with rules to make sure contracts of OEW are equitable; Deploys the overseas
workers for gov’t to gov’t employment; issues license of those applying for recruitment and
manning agency; has adjudicatory functions for violation of recruitment rules and regulations
and for disciplinary action of employers and employees of the agency by revoking license, or
close the agency or blacklist the agency
-What law governs Migrant Workers of OFW?
-which provides under Sec. 10 that, in case of termination of OFW w/out justifiable cause, any
deduction to the employee may be collected with interest of 10% per annum with salaries for
the unexpired portion but only for the duration of 3months of the unexpired portion (such
provision is unconstitutional, as provided in Serrano v. Gallant Maritime Services)
-Under R.A. 10022 such provision was reinstated. But said provision is still not valid, because SC
affirmed the unconstitutionality of the said clause
-Venue of cases will be the regional NLRC L.A. in the residence of the Employee. If the Employee
died, the NLRC in the residence of his or her heirs
OWWA
- Employers abroad are not allowed to directly hire Filipinos to work overseas for them
- Except, when :
1. Member of Diplomatic corps
2. Employee of Int’l orgs
3. Other instances allowed by Sec. of Labor
4. Name hiring
Employee secured employment without assistance of a recruiter
But must inform POEA that an employee is hired by filing its application still to
POEA
Earnings of OFW
Travel Agencies
Persons or partnership or officers or director whose license was engaged in recruitment was
previously revoked
License to recruit may only be used by person or corp whose favor it was issued.
- They are not allowed to collect directly or indirectly from employees fees
- If rights of workers are violated, they will have a recourse by imposing the cash bond
- Covered:
1. Individual persons
2. Entities, Association or Corporations
3. Licensee
4. Holder of an authority
If committed any prohibited practices, regardless if licensed or authorized, they will still be
liable for unlawful acts.
PROHIBITED PRACTICES:
1. Charge or accept directly or indirectly amount in excess of that provided by law or what
was provided in the contract.
2. Publish any false information as to recruitment or employment
Only false information is not allowed
3. Misrepresenting capability in application for license
4. To induce or attempt to induce employee who is already employed to quit and transfer
employment, unless it is necessary to relieve the employee to oppressive terms and
conditions of an employer
5. Influencing or attempt to influence another agency not to employ a person who
previously applied to the agency
6. Recruiting or engaged in recruiting to jobs harmful to health or morality or dignity of the
Republic of the Philippines.
7. Obstructing or attempt to obstruct inspection of Sec. of Labor or his authorized
representatives.
8. Failure to file reports on the status of employment, placement, status and remittances
of an OFW, vacancies of positions abroad.
9. To substitute or alter employment contract duly approved by DOLE without consent of
Sec of Labor.
Refers to a substantial change in the terms of employment, but if the new
contract only serves to clarify the terms without changing its main intentions are
considered still valid.
10. Exempted entities engaging in act of recruitment.
11. Withholding employment documents for monetary reasons or other unreasonable
reasons.
- Sec or his authorized rep, may inspect books of accounts of entities engaged in business
of recruitment.
- Entities are required to submit reports to Sec. of Labor
ILLEGAL RECRUITMENT
Can Sec. of Labor who has knowledge that an illegal recruitment is done by an entity, can he
order the inspection or seizure of the said entity using his visitorial powers?
- No. such is unconstitutional, because he is not a judge who can issue warrant. Thus, the
remedy is to resort to JUDICIAL PROCESS.
1. Person charged with the crime must have undertaken recruitment activities
2. The person does not have license or authority to engage in recruitment.
- 5 years
- 20 years if it is economic sabotage
Where to file?
Here there is also a civil liability which may be filed separately from criminal. Such as when
there is a contract of employment and claim for damages, file it with NLRC office of Labor
Arbiter
LIABILITY:
Penalty:
If licensed:
- Revocation of license
- Prosecution for crime of Estafa
Thus it may be prosecuted together with violation of labor code because they
have different elements
LABOR STANDARDS