11/2/21, 10:02 PM Uh, That's Not A Conspiracy Theory in [Market-Ticker-Nad]

Uh, That's Not A Conspiracy Theory

The Market Ticker - Cancelled ® - What 'They' Don't Want Published

2021-11-02 07:40
by Karl Denninger

Uh, That's Not A Conspiracy Theory

[Comments enabled] in Corruption
, 10530 references

There is an article floating around from The Expose that makes an explosive claim: There is a

wildly statistically-significant skew in the death rate from Covid-19 vaccines by lot
number.

What originally got my attention was the tinfoil hat crowd screaming about lots
being intentionally distributed to certain people to kill them -- in other words certain Covid-19
vaccine lots were for all intents and purposes poisoned.  That was wildly unlikely so I set out to disprove it and
apply some broom handles to the tinfoil hatters heads.  What I found, however, was both interesting and deeply
disturbing.

Lots are quite large, especially when you're dealing with 200 million people and 400 million doses.  Assuming
the lots are not preferentially assigned to certain cohorts (e.g. one goes to all nursing homes, etc) adverse
reactions should thus be normally distributed between lots; if they're not one of these things is almost-certainly
true:

There is a serious manufacturing quality problem or you produced something without understanding how
it would work in the body and thus failed to control for something you had to in order to wind up with
reproduceable results.  That is, some lots are ok, others are contaminated, have too much or too little of
the active ingredient in them, some produce wildly more spike-protein than others in the body when
injected, etc.

OR

Much worse, the lots are intentionally segregated to produce different results. This implies some sort of
nefarious intent such as killing people on a differential basis or that the manufacturers are running
unsanctioned experiments on a mass basis among the population at-large, since they know what is in
each lot and intentionally varied the contents.

OR

Perhaps worst of all, reports are now being intentionally suppressed, the injury and death rate hasn't
changed and there are lots with one of the two above problems but it is being intentionally not reported,
having been detected almost-instantly and health providers were directed to not report anything serious
(e.g. death) associated with the jabs.

Now let's talk about VAERS.  You can grab the public data from it, but VAERS intentionally makes it difficult
to discern differences in lot outcomes.  Why?  Because they separate out the specifics of the vax (the
manufacturer, lot number, etc.) into a different file.  This means that simply loading it into Excel does you no
good and attempting to correlate and match the two tables in Excel itself is problematic due to the extreme size
of the files -- in fact, it blew Excel up here when I tried to do it.  But that's an external data-export
problem; internally, within HHS, it is certainly not hard for them to run correlations.

Indeed the entire point of VAERS is to find said correlations before people get screwed in size and stop it from
happening.

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=244109 1/19
11/2/21, 10:02 PM Uh, That's Not A Conspiracy Theory in [Market-Ticker-Nad]

Let's step back a bit in history. VAERS came into being because back in the 1970s the producers of the DTP
shot had a quality control problem.  Some lots had way too much active ingredient in them and others had
nearly none.  This caused a crap ton of bad reactions by kids who got the jabs and parents sued.  Liability
insurance threatened to become unobtanium (gee, you figure, after you screw a bunch of kids who had to take
mandatory shots?) and thus the manufacturers pulled the DTP jab and threatened to pull all vaccines from the
market.

Congress responded to this threat of intentional panic sown by the pharmaceutical industry by giving the
vaccine firms immunity and setting up a tax and arbitration system, basically, to pay families if they got
screwed by vaccines.  Rather than force the guilty parties to eat the injuries and deaths they caused
Congress instead exempted the manufacturers from the consequences of their own negligence and
socialized the losses with a small tax on each shot.

Part of this was VAERS.  We know VAERS understates adverse events because it while it is allegedly
"mandatory" it is subject to clinical judgment and there is a wild bias against believing that these jabs,
or any jab for that matter, has bad side effects.  In addition there is neither a civil or criminal penalty of any kind
for failure to report.  We now know some people who have had bad side effects from the Covid-19 jabs have
shown up on social media after going to the doctor and then tried to find their own record, which is quite easy to
do if you know the lot number from your card, what happened and the date the event happened -- their doctor
never filed it.  This does not really surprise me since filing those reports takes quite a bit of time and the doctor
isn't paid for it by the government or anyone else, so even without bias there will be those who simply won't do
the work unless there are severe penalties for not doing so.  There are in fact no penalties whatsoever.  The
under-reporting does not have a reliable boundary on it, but estimates are that only somewhere between 3% and
10% of actual adverse events get into the database.  That's right -- at best the adverse event rate is ten times
that of what you find in VAERS.

But now it gets interesting because VAERS exports, it appears, were also set up, whether deliberately or by
coincidink, to make it hard for ordinary people to find a future correlation between injury or death and
vaccine lot number.

NOTE THAT THIS EXACT CIRCUMSTANCE -- THAT MANUFACTURERS HAD QUALITY

CONTROL PROBLEMS ORIGINALLY -- IS WHY VAERS EXISTS.  YOU WOULD THINK THAT IF
CONGRESS WAS ACTUALLY INTERESTED IN SOLVING THE PROBLEM THIS WOULD BE THE
EASIEST SORT OF THING TO MONITOR AND WOULD BE REGULARLY REPORTED.  YOU'D
ALSO THINK THERE WERE STRONG CIVIL AND EVEN CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR NOT
REPORTING ADVERSE EVENTS.

You'd be wrong; the data is across two tables and uncorrelated as VAERS releases it and there is no quick-
and-easy reporting on their site that groups events on a comparative basis by lot number.  While it is
possible to do this sort of analysis from their web page it's not easy.

(Further, and this also intentionally frustrates analysis, VAERS keeps no record nor reports on the number of
shots administered per lot, making norming to some stable denominator literally impossible.  If you think that's
an accident I have a bridge for sale.  It's a very nice bridge.)

But, grasshopper, I have Postgres.  Indeed if you're reading this article it is because I both have it and
know how to program against it; this blog is, in fact, stored in Postgres.

Postgres, like all databases, is very good at taking something that can be foreign-key related and
correlating it.  In fact that's one of a database's prime strengths.  Isn't SQL, which I assume VAERS uses
as well, wonderful?

So I did exactly that with the data found here for 2021.

And..... you aren't going to like it.

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=244109 2/19
11/2/21, 10:02 PM Uh, That's Not A Conspiracy Theory in [Market-Ticker-Nad]

Having loaded the base table and manufacturer tables related by the VAERS-ID I ran this query:

karl=> select vax_lot(vaers_vax), count(vax_lot(vaers_vax)) from vaers, vaers_vax where vaers_id(vaers) =

vaers_id(vaers_vax) and died='Y' and vax_type='COVID19' and vax_manu(vaers_vax)='MODERNA' group by
vax_lot(vaers_vax) order by count(vax_lot(vaers_vax)) desc;

This says:

Select the lot, and count the instances of that lot, from the VAERS data where the report ID is in the table of
persons who had a bad reaction, said bad reaction was that they died, where the vaccine is a Covid-19 vaccine
and where the manufacturer is MODERNA.  Order the results by the count of the deaths per lot in descending
order.
vax_lot | count
-----------------+-------
039K20A | 87
013L20A | 66
012L20A | 64
010M20A | 62
037K20A | 49
029L20A | 48
012M20A | 46
024M20A | 44
027L20A | 44
015M20A | 43
025L20A | 42
026A21A | 41
013M20A | 41
016M20A | 41
022M20A | 41
030L20A | 40
026L20A | 39
007M20A | 39
013A21A | 36
011A21A | 36
031M20A | 35
032L20A | 35
010A21A | 33
011J20A | 33
030A21A | 33
028L20A | 32
011L20A | 32
004M20A | 32
025J20-2A | 31 << -- What's this? (see below)
041L20A | 31
011M20A | 31
031L20A | 30
032H20A | 29
030M20A | 28
042L20A | 27
Unknown | 27
006M20A | 27
012A21A | 25
002A21A | 25
043L20A | 24
032M20A | 24
023M20A | 23
040A21A | 23
027A21A | 23
017B21A | 22
036A21A | 20
unknown | 19
020B21A | 19
https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=244109 3/19
11/2/21, 10:02 PM Uh, That's Not A Conspiracy Theory in [Market-Ticker-Nad]

047A21A | 19
006B21A | 18
044A21A | 17
038K20A | 17
048A21A | 15
003A21A | 15
014M20A | 15
031A21A | 15
031B21A | 15
021B21A | 15
025A21A | 14
007B21A | 14
003B21A | 14
001A21A | 13
038A21A | 13
025B21A | 13
001B21A | 12
046A21A | 12
027B21A | 11
045A21A | 11
038B21A | 11
025J20A | 11
002C21A | 11
016B21A | 11
036B21A | 11
039B21A | 10
002B21A | 10
018B21A | 10
019B21A | 10
008B21A | 10
029K20A | 10
029A21A | 10
028A21A | 9
047B21A | 9
001C21A | 9
044B21A | 8
045B21A | 8
009C21A | 8
048B21A | 8
026B21A | 8
UNKNOWN | 7
039A21A | 7
040B21A | 7
046B21A | 7
032B21A | 7
038C21A | 6
030m20a | 6
027C21A | 6
008C21A | 6
006C21A | 6
004C21A | 6
047C21A | 6
007C21A | 5
025C21A | 5
042B21A | 5
043B21A | 5
025J202A | 5  << -- Same as the above one?
052E21A | 5
003C21A | 5
030B21A | 5
030a21a | 5
016C21A | 5
017C21A | 5
N/A | 5
NO LOT # AVAILA | 5
https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=244109 4/19
11/2/21, 10:02 PM Uh, That's Not A Conspiracy Theory in [Market-Ticker-Nad]

037A21B | 5
037B21A | 5
024m20a | 4
031l20a | 4
003b21a | 4
026a21a | 4
041B21A | 4
005C21A | 4
033C21A | 4
035C21A | 4
021C21A | 4
040a21a | 4
041C21A | 4
006D21A | 4
022C21A | 4
037k20a | 4
048C21A | 4
03M20A | 3
008B212A | 3
039k20a | 3
024C21A | 3
016m20a | 3
038k20a | 3
025b21a | 3
033B21A | 3
026C21A | 3
Moderna | 3
033c21a | 3
014C21A | 3
.....

There are 547 unique lot entries that have one or more deaths associated with them.  Some of the lot numbers are
in the wrong format or missing, as you can also see.  That's not unusual and in fact implicates the ordinary
failure to get things right when people fill out the input.  For example "Moderna" in the above results is clearly
not a lot number.  I've made no attempt to "sanitize" the data set in this regard and, quite-clearly, neither has
VAERS even months after the fact with their "alleged" follow-up on reports.

But there is a wild over-representation in deaths of just a few lots; in fact fewer than 50 lots account for all
lots where more than 20 associated deaths accumulated and out of the 547 unique entries fewer than 100
account for all those with more than 10 deaths.

Normal distribution my ass.

How about Pfizer?

vax_lot | count
-----------------+-------
EN6201 | 117
EN5318 | 99
EN6200 | 97
EN6198 | 89
EL3248 | 86
EL9261 | 84
EM9810 | 82
EN6202 | 75
EL9269 | 75
EL3302 | 69
EL3249 | 67
EL8982 | 67
EN6208 | 59
EL9267 | 58
EL9264 | 57

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=244109 5/19
11/2/21, 10:02 PM Uh, That's Not A Conspiracy Theory in [Market-Ticker-Nad]

EL0140 | 54
EN6199 | 54
EJ1686 | 51
EL9265 | 50
EL1283 | 48
ER2613 | 48
EN6204 | 47
EN6205 | 45
EK9231 | 43
EL3246 | 43
EN6207 | 41
EN6203 | 41
ER8732 | 40
EL1284 | 39
EL0142 | 38
EJ1685 | 38
ER8737 | 37
EN9581 | 36
EN6206 | 35
EP7533 | 35
EL9262 | 34
EL9266 | 33
EL3247 | 32
ER8727 | 28
EP6955 | 27
ER8730 | 26
EW0150 | 25
EK5730 | 24
EP7534 | 24
EM9809 | 22
EK4176 | 22
EH9899 | 21
EW0171 | 21
unknown | 20
ER8731 | 19
ER8735 | 18
EW0172 | 18
EL9263 | 17
EW0151 | 15
ER8733 | 15
EW0158 | 14
EW0164 | 14
EW0162 | 14
EW0169 | 14
ER8729 | 13
ER8734 | 13
Unknown | 13
EW0153 | 13
EW0167 | 12
EW0168 | 10
EW0161 | 10
EW0182 | 9
NO LOT # AVAILA | 8
EW0181 | 8
EW0186 | 8
ER8736 | 8
EW0191 | 8
FF2589 | 7
EW0173 | 6
EW0175 | 6
FA7485 | 6
EW0177 | 6
FD0809 | 6
301308A | 6
EW0170 | 6
https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=244109 6/19
11/2/21, 10:02 PM Uh, That's Not A Conspiracy Theory in [Market-Ticker-Nad]

FC3182 | 6
EW0217 | 6
EK41765 | 5
EW0196 | 5
EW0176 | 5
EW0183 | 4
EN 5318 | 4
el3249 | 4
EW0178 | 4
EW0179 | 4
EW0187 | 4
FA6780 | 4
FA7484 | 4
EN 6207 | 4

Pfizer has 395 unique lot numbers associated with at least one death and, again, there are a few that are
obviously bogus.  But again, normal distribution my ass; there is a wild over-representation with one lot,
EN6201, being associated with 117 deaths and fewer than 20 are associated with more than 50.

For grins and giggles let's look at the age distribution for 039K20A -- the worst Moderna lot.

karl=> select avg(age_yrs) from vaers, vaers_vax where vaers_id(vaers) = vaers_id(vaers_vax) and
vax_type='COVID19' and vax_manu(vaers_vax)='MODERNA' and vax_lot(vaers_vax)='039K20A' and age_yrs
is not null;
      avg
---------------------
 51.4922202119410700
(1 row)

Ok, so the average age of people who got that shot, had a bad reaction (and had a valid age in the table) is 51.

How about for 030A21A which had 33 deaths?

karl=> select avg(age_yrs) from vaers, vaers_vax where vaers_id(vaers) = vaers_id(vaers_vax) and
vax_type='COVID19' and vax_manu(vaers_vax)='MODERNA' and vax_lot(vaers_vax)='030A21A' and age_yrs
is not null;

       avg
---------------------
 61.1097014925373134
(1 row)

Well there goes the argument that we jabbed all the old people in nursing homes with the really nasty
outcome lot and they died but it not caused by the jab and the second lot, which had a much lower rate, all went
into younger people's arms and that's why they didn't die.  Uh, no, actually when it comes to the age of the
people who got jabbed in these two instances its the other way around; the second lot, which was less deadly,
had bad reactions in older people on average yet fewer died -- and significantly so too (by 10 years.)

In addition there is no solid correlation between the "bad" lots and first report of trouble.  The absolute worst of
Moderna had a bad report in the first days of January.  But -- another lot of their vaccine with only 172 reports
against it (1/20th the rate of the worst for total adverse events) had its first adverse event report on January
6th.

What is normally-distributed?  When people died.

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=244109 7/19
11/2/21, 10:02 PM Uh, That's Not A Conspiracy Theory in [Market-Ticker-Nad]

What the actual **** is going on here?  You're going to try to tell me that the CDC, NIH and FDA don't know
about this?  I can suck this data into a database, run 30 seconds of queries against it and instantly identify a
wildly-elevated death and hazard rate associated with certain lot numbers when the distribution of those
associations should be normal, or at least something close to it, across all the lots produced and used?  Then I
look to try to find the obvious potential "clean" explanation (the higher death rate lot could have gone into older
people) and it's simply not there when one looks at all adverse event reports.  I have Moderna lots with the same
average age of persons who died but ten times times the number of associated deaths.

Then I look at reported date of death and.... its reasonably close to a normal distribution.  So no, it wasn't all
those old people getting killed at once in the first month.  So much for that attempted explanation.

Oh if you're interested the nastiest lot was literally everywhere in terms of states reporting adverse events against
it; no, they didn't concentrate them in one state or region either.

The outcome distribution isn't "sort of close" when most of the lots have a single-digit number of associated
deaths.

Isn't it also interesting that when one removes the "dead" flag the same sort of correlation shows up?  That is,
there are plenty of lots with nearly nothing reported against them.  For Moderna within the first page of
results (~85 lots) there is more than a three times difference in total adverse events.  The worst lot, 039K20A
with 87 deaths, is not only worst for deaths; it also has more than 4,000 total adverse event reports against it. 
For context if you drill down a couple hundred entries in that report the number of total adverse events
against another lot, 025C21A number 417 with five deaths.

Are you really going to try to tell me that a mass-produced and distributed jab has a roughly ten times adverse
event rate between two lots and seventeen times the death rate between the same two, you can't explain it by
"older people getting one lot and not the other" and this is not a screaming indication that something that cannot
be explained as random chance has occurred?

Here, in pictures, since some of you need to be hit upside the head with a ****ing railroad tie before you wake
up:

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=244109 8/19
11/2/21, 10:02 PM Uh, That's Not A Conspiracy Theory in [Market-Ticker-Nad]

That's Pfizer deaths by lot, worst-to-best.  Look normal to you?  Remember, zero deaths in a given lot doesn't
come up since it's not in the system.

How about adverse events of all sorts?

(Yes, there are invalid lot numbers, particularly in the second graph, with lots of "1s".  The left side however is
what it is.)

There's a much-larger problem.  Have a look at Moderna's chart of the same thing.  First, deaths:

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=244109 9/19
11/2/21, 10:02 PM Uh, That's Not A Conspiracy Theory in [Market-Ticker-Nad]

And AE's....

These are different companies!

Want even worse news?

JANSSEN, which is an entirely different technology, has the same curve.

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=244109 10/19
11/2/21, 10:02 PM Uh, That's Not A Conspiracy Theory in [Market-Ticker-Nad]

and

What do we have here folks?

Is there something inherent in the production of the "instructions", however they're delivered, that results in
a non-deterministic outcome within a batch of jabs which was not controlled for, perhaps because it isn't
understood SINCE WE HAVE NEVER DONE THIS BEFORE IN MAN OR BEAST and if it goes wrong
you're ****ed?

This is a power-law (exponential) distribution; it is not a step-function nor normally distributed.  Those don't
happen with allegedly consistent manufacturing processes and the potential confounding factor that could be an
innocent explanation (all the bad ones were early and killed all the old people early who died of "something" but
it wasn't the vaccines since they all got the jab first) has been invalidated because the dates of death are in fact
reasonably distributed.

Have doctors been told to stop reporting?  Note that HHS can issue such an order under the PREP Act and
there is no judicial review if they do that.  Did they?

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=244109 11/19
11/2/21, 10:02 PM Uh, That's Not A Conspiracy Theory in [Market-Ticker-Nad]

This demands an explanation.  Three different firms all using spike proteins, two using a different technology
than the third, all three causing the body to produce the spike rather than deliver it directly and all three of
them have a wild skew of some lots that hose people left and right while the others, statistically, do not screw
people.

This data also eliminates the hypothesis put forward that lack of aspiration technique is responsible -- that is,
that occasional accidental penetration of a vein results in systemic distribution.  That would not be lot-specific.

Next question, which VAERS cannot answer: Is there an effectiveness difference between the lots that screw
people and those that do not?

Are we done being stupid yet?  Statistically all of the adverse events of any sort are in a handful of lots
irrespective of the brand.  The rest generate a few bad outcomes while a very, very small number of lots
generate a huge percentage of the harm.  And no, that's not tied to age bracketing (therefore who got it
first either); some of the worst have average age distributions that are less than lots with lower adverse
event rates.  It is also not tied to when used either since one of the "better" lots has a first-AE report right
at the start of January -- as do the "bad" lots.

The only thing all three of these vaccines have in common is that all three of them rely on the human body to
produce the spike protein that is then attacked by the immune system and produces antibodies; none of them
directly introduce the offending substance into the body.  The mechanism of induction is different between
the J&J and Pfizer/Moderna formulations but all exhibit the same problem.  The differential shown in the
data is wildly beyond reasonable explanation related to the cohort dosed and the reported person's average
age for the full set of events (not just deaths) does not correlate with elevated risk in a given lot either so it is
clearly not related to the age of the person jabbed (e.g. "certain lots all went to nursing homes since they were
first.")  While the highest AE rate lots all have early use dates so do some of the low-AE rate lots so the
attempt to explain the data away as "but the highest risk got it first" fails as well.

In other words the best-fit hypothesis is that causing the body to produce part of a pathogen when that part
has pathological capacity (as we know is the case for the spike) cannot be controlled adequately through
commercial manufacturing process at-scale.  This means that no vector-based, irrespective of how (e.g. viral
vector or mRNA), not-directly-infused coronavirus jab will ever have an acceptable safety profile because
some lots will be "hot" and harm crazy percentages of those they're given to with no way to know in advance. 
The basic premise used here -- to have the body produce the agent the immune system identifies rather than
directly introduce it where you can control the quantity, is a failure. 

The entire premise of calling something that does this a "vaccine" is bogus and in the context of a coronavirus
this may never be able to be done safely.

Something is very wrong here folks and the people running VAERS either aren't looking on purpose, know
damn well its happening and are saying nothing about it on purpose -- never mind segregating the data in such a
fashion that casual perusal of their downloads won't find it -- or saw it immediately and suppressed reporting
on purpose.

If these firms were not immune from civil and even criminal prosecution as a result of what Biden and Trump
did the plaintiff's bar would have been crawling up *******s months ago.

This ought to be rammed up every politician's ass along with every single person at the CDC, NIH and
FDA.  They know this is going on; it took me minutes to analyze and find this.

What the HELL is going on here?

THESE SHOTS MUST BE WITHDRAWN NOW until what has happened is fully explained and, if
applicable, accountability is obtained for those injured or killed as a result.  If embargoing of reports is

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=244109 12/19
11/2/21, 10:02 PM Uh, That's Not A Conspiracy Theory in [Market-Ticker-Nad]

proved, and its entirely possible that is the case, everyone involved must go to prison now and the entire
program must be permanently scrapped.

THERE IS NO REASONABLE EXPLANATION FOR THIS DATA THAT REDUCES TO RANDOM

CHANCE.

 
Comments....... User: Not logged on

Login Register Top Blog Top Blog Topics FAQ

Showing Page 1 of 12  First 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Last

User Info Uh, That's Not A Conspiracy Theory in forum [Market-Ticker-Nad]

Jpg You did some calculations of "average" age of those with adverse events.
Posts: 553
Incept: 2009-03-23 Is there any meaningful difference in the result if you compute "median" age instead?

MI 2021-11-02 07:59:53
2
0 Permalink

Fog Thanks Karl, This is great info. Looks like I will be unemployed by the end of the Month.
**** this Clot Shot. There is NO WAY in Hell I would get it.
Posts: 5
Incept: 2021-09-16 And at 56 why bother looking for another job.... I'm Done!

Florida 2021-11-02 08:02:24

9
0 Permalink

Tonythetiger
Posts: 388 This is the ignored cost of ****ing with the body's RNA/DNA replication process.
Incept: 2019-01-27
Just because we figured out how, doesn't mean we should.
Fort Walton
13
0 Even if it can be proved that the results were unexpected, the data is what it is and the
experimentation needs to be stopped immediately, before the next generation of kids gets
the same treatment.

Heads should roll. Lots of them.

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=244109 13/19
11/2/21, 10:02 PM Uh, That's Not A Conspiracy Theory in [Market-Ticker-Nad]

----------
Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom, must, like men, undergo the fatigues
of supporting it.
― Thomas Paine

2021-11-02 08:07:12
Permalink

Hilbertspace This an interesting puzzle with insane consequences.

Posts: 16
Incept: 2021-08-18 The only thing I can think of is that the shots degrade quickly with temperature, and that
the bad lots (severe outcomes) were ones that had better cold storage during transport and
Canada administration.
1
0
I do not think the converse would be true; poor storage temperatures make them more
deadly, as heat generally messes things up. How stable are these lipid nano particles and

adenovirus vector vaccines?

I guess the Janssen one only needs refrigerator temperatures; so my theory does not work
for that one. Could there be another mechanism for degradation of effectiveness?

2021-11-02 08:07:37
From PDA
Permalink

Tickerguy @Hilbertspace - I doubt it.

Posts: 178218
Incept: 2007-06-26 My suspicion is that since ZERO of these jabs actually contain spike, but all cause the
body to make it, there is an uncontrolled element in the production of the lot that causes
some of them to do so on a wildly more-prolific basis.

8
0 Thus if you draw the short straw on the lot you get you're ****ed but there is no way to
know in advance because by the time the reports show up the lot has been expended.

----------
I don't give a flying **** if you're offended.

2021-11-02 08:13:12
Permalink

Dnomsed Bravo. Awesome ticker. Good science - what a breath of fresh air.
Posts: 295
Incept: 2021-05-18 2021-11-02 08:17:37
From PDA
1
0 Permalink

Bluto Don't all the adverse effects per lot need to be normalized (i.e., divided) by lot size, which
I'm sure they make nearly impossible to obtain from the suppliers?
Posts: 501
Incept: 2021-07-10
But the fact alone that some lots produce worse outcomes in younger people is a massive
Florida red flag about the dangers of these clot shots.
https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=244109 14/19
11/2/21, 10:02 PM Uh, That's Not A Conspiracy Theory in [Market-Ticker-Nad]

11
0
Also, I remember reading that Japan did testing, and pulled several lots due to
"contamination". Since the US has about 3X the number of people as Japan, it would

make sense for the US to have pulled about 3X the number of lots. But I don't think they
have pulled any. Maybe because they simply didn't care to test? Warp speed, and all....
What a cluster.

The other really interesting thing to tie together would be number of Fauci flu cases
and/or antibodies in people organized by lot number. But the gov't is not collecting that
data. I wonder why?? The whole system is rotten to the core.

----------
"I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over
the mind of man." -- Thomas Jefferson

2021-11-02 08:17:41
Permalink

Lulubell I find this more terrifying than anything else you've written. I saw the video yesterday, I
didn't watch it, I just turned away from it. But this morning I thought about it and thought
Posts: 18
Incept: 2021-03-15 maybe I should go watch that. But now I don't have to.

7
0 So when the time comes and they've rounded us all up into camps for not getting the jab
and then they force it on us, I wonder which lot we will get?

2021-11-02 08:18:34
From PDA
Permalink

Motorelay Yet another nail in the coffin that we here have been givig a wide berth to for a long time
now.
Posts: 31
Incept: 2021-09-20
The bad news is that no, they won't be stopping the vax program soon, or lining up the
Connecticut perps for the firing squad.
2
0
The good news is that anybody who wanted the jab got one long ago, leaving only
employer- coerced stragglers and dropping the vaccine uptake rate to lowest levels.

The sad news is that now the gov is targeting young kids to take up the slack. Parents
need to be vigilant for their kids. They will try to jab them at school, without parental
consent.

2021-11-02 08:21:01
From PDA
Permalink

Maddmaxx Just getting into it and noticed this typo: they caused they instead exempted. Seems you
were caught between two choices but left both in.
Posts: 400
Incept: 2021-05-31
2021-11-02 08:25:24
From PDA
Online Permalink
0
0

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=244109 15/19
11/2/21, 10:02 PM Uh, That's Not A Conspiracy Theory in [Market-Ticker-Nad]

Tickerguy No, just poorly-worded. Fixed.

Posts: 178218
Incept: 2007-06-26 ----------
I don't give a flying **** if you're offended.

0
0 2021-11-02 08:26:30
Permalink

Mikpaq Awesome Ticker.

Posts: 603
Incept: 2009-02-26 @Tickerguy, I think your conclusion is the most likely.."since ZERO of these jabs
actually contain spike, but all cause the body to make it, there is an uncontrolled
Behind enemy lines element in the production of the lot that causes some of them to do so on a wildly
6
0 more-prolific basis..

If it were one company you could argue quality control, but not with 3 separate

companies having the same outcomes.

I also believe one could argue, incorrectly, that VAERS is now being over reported due to
all of the notoriety. However if you look up recent flu vaccine deaths, 2021, it hasn't
really changed at all. So that's bull**** too.

----------
Remember, pillage first, then burn.

2021-11-02 08:28:15
Permalink

Handyone55 Possible tinfoil but here goes: What if you wanted a certain predictable kill rate from the
Posts: 318 shot? The only way to get solid data is to test the kill shot on a broad sample of the
Incept: 2010-07-06 population and observe the results. Mixing the kill shots with placebo shots spreads the
deaths out enough so most will not notice them.
Ceciltucky, Maryland
13
0 Once you know the kill shot produces predictable results, roll out the mandatory boosters
that the sheep must take to work, buy food, get medical care, even go outdoors. The
booster will contain the percent of kill shot for the death rate desired.

If you were to release a bio weapon with a 10 percent kill rate, the sheep would trample
each other getting in line for a booster

2021-11-02 08:30:24
From PDA
Permalink

Cmoledor And here the master does the work that I would have clue on how to do. Gratitude in
massive amounts Karl. Sending out to my peeps.
Posts: 341
Incept: 2021-04-13
----------

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=244109 16/19
11/2/21, 10:02 PM Uh, That's Not A Conspiracy Theory in [Market-Ticker-Nad]
Akron Ohio FEMA The whole world is one big ****ing scam
region 5 Why are you giving a vulgarity warning here? Our genial host is an advocate of both
1
0 skull****ing and sodomy via rusty chainsaw. Credit to Rollformer

2021-11-02 08:33:05

From PDA
Permalink

Jwm_in_sb Hmm, this would seem ripe foe hanging around Trumps neck which the Regime needs
heading into 2022. Watch for that to happen and that would be their exit ramp foe both
Posts: 3670
Incept: 2009-04-16 the vaxx itself and the mandates.

California Desert 2021-11-02 08:33:34

3
0 From PDA
Permalink

Uwe
Posts: 10014 KD wrote..
Incept: 2009-01-03
by the time the reports show up the lot has been expended.

USA
3
0 Given that VAERS and manufacturer immunity came about due to QC problems, I'm
surprised manufacturers aren't required to retain a few sample vials from each lot
produced for a period of time, say at least one year.

Do we have any idea how big these lots are? I.e. how many doses or vials there are in a
lot, or how many lots have been produced? Obviously the manufacturers have this data,
and I'd think the FDA does too, so it might be available via a FOIA request.

Lastly, are you aware that Pfizer has changed the formulation of the shots they will be
making available to the 5-11 age group? No, not just the dosage, but the formulation of
the carrier. I have details on my real computer, but not the tablet I'm using at the moment.

----------
"Corona Virus will come and go, but government will NEVER forget how easy it was to take control of everyone's life; to control every
sporting event, classroom, restaurant table, church pew, and even whether you are allowed to leave your house.

2021-11-02 08:36:30
Permalink

Bzelbob @Tickerguy - Good detective work and fantastic article. (Nice SQL too.)
Posts: 69
Incept: 2021-09-12 Was gonna make the same comment as Bluto, in that we know Japan found
contamination (stainless steel particulate from manufacturing process if memory serves.)
Jacksonville Not sure how that would make this kind of difference...
2
0
I can't think of an explanation for this data other than what you said that somehow the
reporting *instructions* changed so that they somehow changed or stopped reporting the

adverse effects.
If that's true, then yeah it's a huge **** sandwich.

My money's on the fact that they DID know early on and took the decision to conceal the
truth anyway because of panic.
https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=244109 17/19
11/2/21, 10:02 PM Uh, That's Not A Conspiracy Theory in [Market-Ticker-Nad]

(And why they can't admit to being wrong = maximum culpability.)

Who said it's not the crime that gets you it's the coverup?

----------
"Threats are illogical. And payment is usually expensive." - Sarek of Vulcan

2021-11-02 08:37:19
Permalink

Ring_main I may have missed it but is there any way to estimate lot sizes? Normalizing reactions
based on lot size would confirm skew. That said the number of reactions for some lots are
Posts: 44
Incept: 2012-01-16 so out of wack it would be exceptionally unlikely for a lot size to be big enough relative
to the others for it to come close to evening out (20-30x or more lot size for biggest to
1
0 smallest.)

2021-11-02 08:41:57

From PDA
Permalink

Maddmaxx @TG, yes, sorry, jumped the gun. On second read I realized my mistake. Great article!
Posts: 400
Incept: 2021-05-31 2021-11-02 08:42:18
From PDA
Permalink
Online
0
0

Quantum @Tickerguy Awesome work. Thanks for doing this.

Posts: 267
Incept: 2021-05-18 @Tonythetiger ACIP is meeting today to consider recommendations to vaccinate 5 to 11
year olds. If they go forward at this point (which they will)...
1
0
@Bluto I expect that if they address this at all, they'll say it doesn't control for lot size
and that lot size is variable. One could do some number-crunching to see what variation

would be needed to put this into the realm of normal statistical variation, but unless some
lots are tiny and others tens or hundreds of thousands, it would be tough. Nonetheless, a
dismissive comeback is probably what they'll try (if anything).

2021-11-02 08:45:31
Permalink

Asimov
Posts: 130495 Quote:
Incept: 2007-08-26
there is an uncontrolled element in the production of the lot that causes
East Tennessee some of them to do so on a wildly more-prolific basis.
4
0

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=244109 18/19
11/2/21, 10:02 PM Uh, That's Not A Conspiracy Theory in [Market-Ticker-Nad]

This is probably the key reason MRNA vaccines were held in reserve for possible
biological weapon attack where we needed a vaccine *NOW* because the weapon was

killing a huge percentage of the infected.

They've known and they know now. There would be no reason to hide it if they didn't.

----------
It's justifiably immoral to deal morally with an immoral entity.

Festina lente.

2021-11-02 08:45:57
Permalink

Capcomp Given the high level of automation in the manufacturing process of the jabs I just can't
see how this was not intentional.
Posts: 151
Incept: 2009-09-10
As @Bluto mentioned Japan pulled some Moderna after finding contamination. Would
Virginia sure be interesting to see what lot # that was.
2
0
2021-11-02 08:49:20
Permalink

Snowmizuh Stupid question: is the denominator of the lots numbers all roughly the same? My first
thought, since you are plotting absolute counts...
Posts: 1987
Incept: 2009-03-18
Perhaps looking at distribution of (adverse event)/(lot count) by lotID would be useful.
Alabama
1
0 2021-11-02 08:49:40
Permalink

Spanky It's a Clottery good luck everybody.

Posts: 142
Incept: 2011-03-22 2021-11-02 08:52:59
From PDA
United States Permalink
14
0

Login Register Top Blog Top Blog Topics FAQ

Showing Page 1 of 12  First 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Last

Click for DMCA (http://www.tickerforum.org/dmca.html) and

User Conduct (http://www.tickerforum.org/usercomplaint.html) complaints,
along with our privacy policy. (http://tickerforum.org/faq.html#privacy)
AKCS V45.9 Copyright 1993-2021 Karl Denninger. All Rights Reserved. [Elapsed: 267 ops in 0.171, 0.538 runtime seconds]
Email the AKCS Owner

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=244109 19/19