Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2021 Unit Handbook Food Safety and Sanitation
2021 Unit Handbook Food Safety and Sanitation
CONTENTS
ETHICAL ISSUES
Within this unit, any issues relating to the American Hotel Academy/ TASTE Culinary Business Academy ethical
code of practice will be addressed by tutors. If a student has ethical concerns regarding teaching and learning,
it is their responsibility and right to bring it to the attention of the Unit Leader.
LEARNING OUTCOMES
1. To determine the place of food safety and sanitation versus gastronomy and kitchen practices.
5. To implement and evaluate a food safety risk management system such as HCCP, to control quality, cost
control and food safety goals
WEEK-BY-WEEK DELIVERY
Weight
No. Assessment Name Submission Date
Factor (%)
1. Midterm examination 40% November, 2021
2. Final examination 60% December, 2021
In order to pass the unit, students must receive a passing grade (40% or above) in each element of assessment.
ATTENDANCE RULE
Except from Attendance Policy – American Hotel Academy / TASTE Culinary Business Academy Assessment
Rules and Regulations
4.2.1 If a student registers more than 51% absences for a theoretical class and more than 31% absences for a
practical class, it is deemed that the student cannot meet the course learning outcomes, will not be able to
take the final exam, nor participate in the resit exams.
4.2.2 The student will need to retake the entire course (both the theoretical and practical part), as if for the
first time the next time it is offered. Students will be charged a per credit fee.
Learning Outcomes to 1. Determine the place of food safety and sanitation versus gastronomy and
be Assessed through kitchen practices
2. Identify the agents responsible for food contamination
this Work 3. Determine the outcomes of foodborne illnesses and the consequences
Assessment Details
The students (in groups of 2) are required to complete a project of 2000 words.
Using the following headings, prepare the project using Calibri, 10, with 1.5 spacing and
covering the following topics:
1. Determine the importance of food safety and sanitation and its link to
gastronomy and kitchen practices
2. Identify the agents responsible for food contamination
3. Determine the outcomes of foodborne illnesses and the consequences
4. Procedures to be followed in a kitchen to minimise the contamination risk to
guests
Instruction to The following criteria will be used to assess the report. Total Mark possible 100%:
Students 1. Cover page completed correctly and professionally (must mention the project name,
students’ names, lecturer name, table of contents) – 5 points
2. Introduction – complete that explains the background to the project – 10 points
3. The importance of food safety and sanitation and its link to gastronomy and kitchen
practices - 15 points
4. Identified agents responsible for food contamination – 15 points
5. Determine the outcomes of foodborne illnesses and the consequences – 15 points
6. Procedures to be followed in a kitchen to minimise the contamination risk to guests –
15 points
7. References in list – at least 5 academic and relevant references – 5 points
8. Overall layout and power point presentation of the project – 20 points
Assessment
Objective / Type of expected answers: description, explanation, summary of data collection.
Rationale
In groups of 2, complete a 2,000-word coursework upon the requirements above.
One student part of the group project must upload the project on eCampus by 9 th of
Assessment Task November 2021, 9 0’clock. Must have the power point presentation on a memory
stick or uploaded on eCampus.
The project The project Ideas have been The information Articulation of systems
indicates an demonstrates an expressed to an has been and procedures for
extremely high extremely high degree extremely high thoroughly operating and
standard of of ability to work standard information designed, planned controlling hospitality
relevant and competently with has been and carried out activities have been
original insight of reference to communicated to a using and addressed to an
the subject professional standards selected audience appropriate range extremely high
and values, ability to using a range of of primary and standard in
86%-
The project reflect on own work. An strategies and media. secondary conclusions and
100%
provides an extremely high level of sources. The recommendations
extremely high initiative, creativity, results are have been made.
standard of professional practice evaluated
reference to and self -management accurately to an
theory and is evident. extremely high
practice with standard
evidence to some
critical reflection.
The project The project Ideas have been The information Articulation of systems
indicates an very demonstrates a very expressed to a very has been and procedures for
high standard of high degree of ability to high standard thoroughly operating and
relevant and work competently with information has been designed, planned controlling hospitality
original insight of reference to communicated to a and carried out activities have been
the subject professional standards selected audience using and addressed to a very
and values, ability to using a range of appropriate range high standard in
70%-
The project reflect on own work. A strategies and media. of primary and conclusions and
85%
provides a very very high level of secondary recommendations
high standard of initiative, creativity, sources. The have been made.
reference to professional practice results are
theory and and self -management evaluated
practice with is evident. accurately to a
evidence to some very high
critical reflection. standard
The project The project Ideas have been The information Articulation of systems
indicates an very demonstrates a very expressed to a very has been and procedures for
good standard of good degree of ability good standard thoroughly operating and
relevant and to work competently information has been designed, planned controlling hospitality
original insight of with reference to communicated to a and carried out activities have been
the subject professional standards selected audience using and addressed to a very
and values, ability to using a range of appropriate range good standard in
60%-
The project reflect on own work. A strategies and media. of primary and conclusions and
69%
provides a very very good level of secondary recommendations
good standard of initiative, creativity, sources. The have been made.
reference to professional practice results are
theory and and self -management evaluated
practice with is evident. accurately to a
evidence to some very good
critical reflection. standard
The project The project Ideas have been The information Articulation of systems
indicates an good demonstrates a good expressed to a good has been and procedures for
standard of degree of ability to standard information thoroughly operating and
relevant and work competently with has been designed, planned controlling hospitality
original insight of reference to communicated to a and carried out activities have been
the subject professional standards selected audience using and addressed to a good
and values, ability to using a range of appropriate range standard in
50%-
The project reflect on own work. A strategies and media. of primary and conclusions and
59%
provides a good good level of initiative, secondary recommendations
standard of creativity, professional sources. The have been made.
reference to practice and self results are
theory and -management is evaluated
practice with evident. accurately to a
evidence to some good standard
critical reflection.
The project The project Ideas have been The information Articulation of systems
indicates a demonstrates a expressed to a has been and procedures for
satisfactory satisfactory degree of satisfactory standard thoroughly operating and
standard of ability to work information has been designed, planned controlling hospitality
relevant and competently with communicated to a and carried out activities have been
original insight of reference to selected audience using and addressed to a
the subject professional standards using a range of appropriate range satisfactory standard
and values, ability to strategies and media. of primary and in conclusions and
40%-
The project reflect on own work. A secondary recommendations
49%
provides a satisfactory level of sources. The have been made.
satisfactory initiative, creativity, results are
standard of professional practice evaluated
reference to and self -management accurately to a
theory and is evident. satisfactory
practice with standard
evidence to some
critical reflection.
The project The project Ideas have been The information Articulation of systems
indicates a poor demonstrates a poor expressed to a poor has been and procedures for
standard of degree of ability to standard information thoroughly operating and
relevant and work competently with has been designed, planned controlling hospitality
original insight of reference to communicated to a and carried out activities have been
the subject professional standards selected audience using and addressed to a poor
and values, ability to using a range of appropriate range standard in
35%-
The project reflect on own work. A strategies and media. of primary and conclusions and
39%
provides a poor poor level of initiative, secondary recommendations
standard of creativity, professional sources. The have been made.
reference to practice and self results are
theory and -management is evaluated
practice with evident. accurately to a
evidence to some poor standard
critical reflection.
The project The project Ideas have been The information Articulation of systems
indicates a very demonstrates a very expressed to a very has been and procedures for
poor standard of poor standard of poor standard thoroughly operating and
relevant detail professionalism, information has been evaluated, and controlling hospitality
and insight of the evidence is apparent in communicated synthesised and accommodation
subject the execution, layout, effectively, executed to a very activities have been
structure of the design appropriately and poor standard addressed to a very
20%- The project brief and the evaluative accurately. poor standard
34% provides a very essay.
poor standard
account of links An extremely poor
between theory standard of initiative,
and practice. creativity, professional
practice and self
-management is
evident.
The design brief The project Ideas have been The information Articulation of systems
indicates an demonstrates an expressed to an has been and procedures for
extremely poor extremely poor extremely poor thoroughly operating and
standard of standard of standard information evaluated, and controlling hospitality
relevant detail professionalism, has been synthesised and accommodation
and insight of the evidence is apparent in communicated executed to an activities have been
subject. the execution, layout, effectively, extremely poor addressed to a
structure of the design appropriately and standard extremely poor
0%-
The essay brief and the evaluative accurately. standard
19%
provides an essay.
extremely poor
standard account An extremely poor
of links between standard of initiative,
theory and creativity, professional
practice. practice and self
-management is
evident.
Examination Rubric
Students are not allowed to leave the examination room in the first 45 minutes of the exam.
ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT
Academic misconduct is defined as any action or omission by a student that has the potential to give the
student an unfair advantage in any assessment.
All student created assignments, other than written examinations, may be checked against plagiarism using an
originality check software such as Unplag.
END OF DOCUMENT