A Paradigm of ‘Absolute Music’
Goeyvaerts’s N°.4 as Numerus Sonorus
Heras Savor
(Gent Bruxelles)
982. ign composer Kae Goce pine vis ely the
very fitst score ever intended for realisation through electronic means. He called it
N°. 4 for dead tones.
‘The score consists of a verbal introduction and a line drawing, showing sounds 2s
horizontal (straight) lines. all of them of the same length ic, duration, expressed as
centimeters of tape length (se the illustration atthe end ofthe paper: three pages from
the score: the first page, one page from midway through the score, and the last page,
respectively). Empty spaces between successive lines indicate durations of intervening
silence. There are four layers of sound-silence. All durations of sounds being equal,
itis the differentiated onset intervals between suecessive sounds, regulated, foreach
‘of the four layers separately in accordance with ts own progressively increasing then
decreasing arithmetic series, which determine the temporal evolvement ofthe piece.
‘At the outset, the four sounds are synchronous, then — because ofthe different
‘durations for each layer of the intervening rests — they gradually spread out, “phase
shifting” until they queue up: then the process is resumed in reverse order. so the
four sounds gradually interlock to end up in phase, in synchrony again. This overall
circular process — “ma fn est mon commencement” — suggests the workings of an
isolated system returning fo its initial state an endless number of times; the whole
being reduced 10 a singular, identically repeatable event, remaining unaltered even
under reversion. The graphic design may be read as.a ‘score’, .e-an ensemble of signs
‘suggesting the realisation ofthe music in sound. As tothe definition ofthe sounds, the
verbal introduction reads as follows (my translation)
Invew of easton oneness four inti ead tons' ndtodrespctely as, B,C, ad
1 "Dead tones" at tones whove eta somposn eins sonst, Ter crmposion may
bee or less conpien. bt they shuld te cml haaaencous ough tine It ewe 0
realise dead tones ne mechanical action ca ballon Dead tex ean be prods iret
Snelecvonc generator Beses Bg ‘dead tones A H.C, aD ould a1) be dive,
nuns opr of he stone of oe he lens eth yp othe aba of he
‘ther ons 2} hes smplex in compasion, fat each oe eit Renal in ie
numer of ound atoms
From 198 on. Gwyn renauscel any tles rd ery ured i acoae oret
Sich gusset laguag spice sage fr ebjecy wah karate sar ade
‘ses moceram nthe 1950 Ae opr cll cont et cal hat Gosjac eet WatBeing perfectly homogeneous, “dead tones" are reversible without altering any of
their imbral, spear envelope characteristics The music i its own retrogeadaion
time has no direction, no arrow. What Goeyvaerss clearly is concemed with here is
the ultimate fixation and standing quality of sound: music as an imprint in sounding
matter of transcendental everlasting truth. Stockhausen'eters to Goeyvuerts during
1952 testify to the later’ obsession with a immobile taping machine that would allow
{quite literally for an imprint of sound on tape, a concept reminiscent ofthe imprint
‘of numerical werld order in sounding matter, known to the Ancients as mumeres
sonora.
In the composer’ preparatory notes to N°. there is question of “sounds without
corporeality, And immediately afte: “Etiam peccata, Our knowledge is conditioned
by our sinful being”. This pronouncement may be construed to reveal @ possible
autopsychographic background to this extraordinary longing for lifelessness: sounds
without eorpoeakity as symbolic of being without corporeal
‘The conception of 124 is not, strictly speaking, serial; unless one generalizes
the definition of seraism to two premises: the preselection of materials, and ther
equidistibution. What interested ourauthor was toa authorial contol — paradoxically
in onder to efface himself. To Goeyvaers, serility was one way only of ordering
elements one posible controlling device.
In Gocyvaerts’ mind a the time, the exclusive use of eleetonics for sound
generation promised a world of pure and integrally conrlled music It would allow
to fx also those parametess that had net been susceptible of discrete notation (atleast
ot with any degree of exactitude) and so had escaped detiled rational contol. It
‘would allow quantifying discrete emities in terms of frequencies, spectra, decibels,
nillimtricallydiferentiated tape cuttings. It would aso allow to homogenize, to
“deaden' musical tones, that would no logr be maculated by the imperfections of
thuman performers It would allow erating works that would be forever unalterable in
sucoessve performances. The sine tone, considered by Goeyvaens (from 1951 on) to
be the atom of the physical world of sound, would make it posible to reconstruct the
entre world of music from the round up.
Nt realises an ideal of purty, precision and constancy: four non-harmonie
spectra, cach of them homogeneous but mutually heterogeneous are repeated. quite
‘dentally, over and over. Zero flexibility and totally hypostasized idetity. A world
perfectly closed, and — should we not say to-day — ready tobe cloned. The perfect
“simulation: all things made restless simular, a study in sameness
In aesthetic terms, N".4 may well represen the most radical pretension of totality
and positivity ever
Lame exact fm thee eter (1951 hgh 198) hve est en bled y HS in Karte
Sinthavon ww de erg (anshen, 19K; "Mone Konepe” 9) Theor are aw he
New Muse Decuedtanan Cue at Lawai Univers, Belgium,A Pana Amore Mone” Garay 4a tua Say BLS
Rarus stans..At fist sight, indeed, N°.4 would seem to stand by itself, all alone in its
radicalism, with no candidates whatsoever for predecessors or successors. Amongst
the immediate contemporaries of Goeyvaerts in 1952, mention should be made of,
among others, Stockhausen, Brown, Cage.
[As regards electroacoustic technology, the non-harmonic spectra preseribed by
Goeyvaerts are what Stockhausen would ater call “Tongemische”. AS 10 aesthetics,
however, 4"-4 meant the parting ofthe ways for both composers. Goeyvaers' longing
for immobility, for toal stasis, would never be agrecable to Stockhausen, whose
conception was so much more dynamic (Goeyvaerts would call it “baroque”
‘One other seore initiated in 1952 which is a (collection of) fine drawing(s) is
Earle Brown's Four Sysiems, But thats where the resemblance ends. For one thing,
Brown's intentions were at the oppasite of Goeyvaertss. Whereas the latter intended
to neutralize any possible outside interference, the formers aim was fo activate the
Imagination ofthe reader-performer.
In the above-mentioned preparstory notes, Goeyvacrts makes an important
distinction berween “sounding ime” and “pure time”. pute time being neither sounding
nor silent, for, says Goeyvaerts, “silence too is matter!”
Goeyvaertss notion of so-called pure time thus appears to be of a metaphysical
nature, and would seem akin to the one held by Cage at the same time, in 1952,
the year of the blueprining of 4°33". N°4 and 4°33 both are arbitrary constructs,
With Goeywaerts, however, arbitrariness means utmost wilfulness; with Cage, on the
contrary itis supposed to mean the elimination ofthe will the epitome of willessness.
Both N° and 4'33" signal the end of an expressivist aesthetic of music as the
representation of subjective ineriority
one considers N°. ¢ tobe the acme of rational control onthe part ofthe maker over
‘the musical artifact, it may be instructive to consider words Cage devised to explain
his own way of funetioning as a composer but that now sound as though writen with
Goeyvaerts effort in mind: “Any attempt to exclude the “irrational is irrational. Any
‘composing strategy which is wholly rational” is irrational inthe extreme
Finally, as far as “immediate contemporaries” are concerned.’ itis instructive to
note, incidentally, that 1952 is the year also of Boulez" Siructures I, the epitome of
strictly (not automatedly) applied muliple-srialist methodology.
‘The interesting question now is: What place in music historiography may such radical
musical artifact as N°4 occupy’?
First: What posterity for N°.4? Not having been actualized at the time of its
conception, and its score, its “blueprint” not having been published nor in any way
‘ute om | Cae, “Fara of Moder Ms” in Sune Loden 41980) 5,00
Amoogs te 195 cnemporais of Gjertsen of core ah ean a said Kd
‘onto cote Bu whereas Goyer ating ows he cand Feldman fy pen et
‘owt nomi £1) ith Goyer, sande om nts esse te = Feo ecirculated, N°.4 with dead tones has not had any direct influence. All the same, it may,
in retrospect, be read as announcing, ‘avant la lettre, several later developments,
‘Clearly, “N"-4" isa forerunner to minimalism and repetitive music, in particular to La
‘Monte Young's ideal of working with perfectly stable, sustained tones, and to sound
sine wave chords for weeks ata time, La Monte Young's ideal as expressed in the
instruction to Arabic Numeral (Any Integer) to Henry Fiynt (1960) : “Repeat a loud,
heavy sound every one of two seconds as uniformly and regularly as possible for a
long period of time” *
‘There is no doubt, either, that 4" can be described in terms of “a gradual phase
shifting process’ such as Steve Reich would realise and theorise some fifteen years
later.
‘Also, Nis conceptual art avant fe leste:a concept, a projec, a verbal and graphic
‘design, eventually to be instantiated; in other words sil: a composition model, the
realisation of which by Gocyvaerts himself and myself in the electronic studio of
IPEM at Ghent University in 1980 being a model-composition: one instantiation of a