OPENABLE WINDOW WT-06 ANALYSIS

WITH WIND LOAD -1.25 kPa

(Module Panel, 1209 mm W x 2485 mm H)

TOKYU MEGA KUNINGAN

JAKARTA
30th April 2021
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R1
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. DESIGN CRITERIA …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 1

II. REFERENCE DRAWING …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 3

III. GLASS ANALYSIS ……….………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 13

IV. PANEL LOAD ………………………………………………………………………………………………..………………………………………………………………. 14

V. ALUMINIUM ANALYSIS ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……………….. 15

VI. CAST IN CHANNEL ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 58

VII. FIXING & CONNECTION …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 73

VIII. APPENDIX ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 85

 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

I. DESIGN CRITERIA
Project name : Tokyu Mega Kuningan - Jakarta
Propose : Window Wall Porpose WT-06
1. General Configuration
Typical panel height = 2485 mm
Typical panel width = 1209 mm
Glass thickness = 5mm HS + 1.52 PVB + 5mm HS
2. Design Wind Pressure
Wind pressure on North Tower = -1.25kPa (p. 108 – p. 110)
3. Codes Used
Aluminium :AS/NZS 1664.2:1997
Glass :AS 1288-2006
Steel :BS 5950-1:2000
4. Deflection
Deflection according MFT Specification
Aluminium out of plane: L/175, L ≤ 4115mm or L/240 + 6.35mm, 4115mm ≤ L ≤ 12200mm (p. 114)
Aluminium in of plane: L/300 or 3mm , L/300 or 1.5mm (p. 114)
Steel: L/300
Glass: L/60 or 20mm
5. Factors of safety used in design
Cast in fixing
Dead Load: 2.0
Wind Load: 1.4
6. Computer Analysis used STAAD. Pro V8i
7. Steel Properties
(British Standard, BS 5950-1:2000)
5
Modulus of elasticity, E = 2.05 x 10 MPa
Modulus of shear, G = 8.1 x 104 MPa
Poisson, µ = 0.3
Coeff. Of linear expansion, α = 12 x 10-6 /°C
Density, ρ = 7850kg/m³
8. Aluminium properties
Modulus of elasticity, E = 7.0 x 104 Mpa
Modulus of shear, G = 2.66 x 104 MPa
Poisson, µ = 0.33
Coeff. Of linear expansion, α = 23 x 10-6 /°C
Density, ρ = 2710kg/m³
9. Minimum Mechanical Properties for Aluminium Alloys
Alloy 6063-T6 Alloy 6061-T6
Tension = 172 MPa Tension = 241 MPa
Bending = 172 MPa Bending = 241 MPa
Shear = 96 MPa Shear = 138 MPa
Bearing = 276 MPa Bearing = 386 MPa
10. Glass Properties
Modulus of elasticity, E = 7.2 x 104 Mpa
Modulus of shear, G = 3 x 104 MPa
Poisson, µ = 0.25
Coeff. Of linear expansion, α = 9 x 10-6 /°C
Density, ρ = 2500kg/m³

1
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

11. Fasteners
Stainless steel
A2-70 (Interior)
Ultimate Tensile Strength, Fu = 400MPa
Yield Strength, Fy = 240MPa

Stainless steel
A4-80 (Eksterior)
Ultimate Tensile Strength, Fu = 800MPa
Yield Strength, Fy = 600MPa

2
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

II. REFERENCE DRAWING

Partial Elevation

3
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1
Partial Plan

4
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1
Partial Plan

5
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1
Horizontal Typical Detail (Window)

6
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1
Horizontal Transom Detail

7
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1
Horizontal Bottom Detail (Window)

8
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1
Horizontal Bottom Detail (Bottom)

9
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1
Vertical Detail Bottom Window Area

10
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1
Vertical Detail Window

11
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1
Vertical Detail Mullion

12
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

III. GLASS ANALYSIS

Glass Analysis 10mm

t  10mm (actual thickness in analysis is 9.6mm)
D L =Self Weight (p. 86) (Self Weight of Glass)
WL  1.25 kPa (p. 85) (Wind Load of Glass)
LL  1.00kPa (p. 86) (Live Load of Glass) (Refer to BS 6399 Part 1:1996)
a  1197mm
b  1208mm

Due to Combination Load 1 ( 1.4SW+1.4WL)

Allowable breaking stress of glass 10mm = 52.48Mpa (p. 106)

Maximum stress at glass due combination load 1 = 7.52MPa < 52.48MPa (p. 87)
 a 
Allowable deflection at glass due to combination load 1 :   min   20mm    19.95  mm
 60 
Deflection on glass 2.621mm < Allowable deflection meet the requirement (p. 87)

Due to Combination Load 2 (1.2DL+1.2WL+1.2LL)

Allowable breaking stress of glass 10mm = 52.48Mpa (p. 106)

Maximum stress at glass due to combination load 2 = 11.6MPa < 52.48MPa (p. 88)
 a 
Allowable deflection at glass due to combination load 2 :   min   20mm    19.95  mm
 60 
Deflection on glass 4.044mm < Allowable deflection meet the requirement (p. 88)

13
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

IV. PANEL LOAD

Module Panel 1209mm x 2485mm

1. Dead load Window Panel

Al. Mullion : 2.74kg/m x 2.485m = 6.81kg
Al. Bottom Frame + Clip : 1.47kg/m x 1.200m = 1.76kg
Al. Frame Mullion + Clip : 1.51kg/m x 1.248m = 1.88kg
Al. Head Frame : 1.74kg/m x 1.209m = 2.10kg
Al. Head Transom + Capping : 3.18kg/m x 1.209m = 3.84kg
Al. Mid Frame : 1.49kg/m x 1.209m = 1.80kg
Al. Mid Transom + Capping : 2.23kg/m x 1.209m = 2.70kg
Al. Sill Transom + Capping : 2.21kg/m x 1.209m = 2.67kg
Top Glass : 25kg/m2 x 1.197m x 1.208m = 36.15kg
Bottom Glass : 25kg/m2 x 1.183m x 1.152m = 34.07kg +
Total Dead Load = 93.78kg  919.66N (1kg=9.8066N)

2. Dead load Typical Panel

Mullion : 3.78kg/m x 2.485m = 9.39kg
Al. Head Transom+Clip : 2.62kg/m x 1.209m = 3.17kg
Al. Sill Transom+Clip : 2.92kg/m x 1.209m = 3.53kg
Glass : 25kg/m2 x 1.178m x 2.406m = 70.86kg +
Total Dead Load = 86.95kg  852.68N (1kg=9.8066N)

3. Wind load (Negative)

Wind Pressure = 1.25kPa (p. 1)

14
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

V. ALUMINIUM ANALYSIS

1. Mullion and Mullion Bottom Frame Wind Load

Distributed Wind Load Mullion and Mullion Bottom Frame
4
Inertia Mullion = Im  1181193 mm

4
Inertia Bottom Frame = If  177285 mm

Total Moment Inertia (Itotal)

6 4
Itotal  Im  If Itotal  1.358  10  mm

Im
Sm  Sm  0.869
Itotal

If
Sf  Sf  0.131
Itotal

Wind Load on each part

kN
WP  1.25
2
m
kN
fwm  Sm  WP f wm  1.087 
2
m
kN
fwf  Sf  WP fwf  0.163 
2
m
Height of Mullion L  2.485m

Width of Mullion W  1.209m

1. Door Mullion
kN
Wind Suction f wm  1.087 
2
m
kN
Uniform distribution load qm  fwm  W qm  1.314  (Reffference Formula p. 111)
m

2. Door Frame
kN
Wind Suction fwf  0.163 
2
m
kN
Uniform distribution load qf  fwf  W qf  0.197  (Reffference Formula p. 111)
m

15
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

2. Head Transom Wind Load

kN
WL  1.25
2
m
Iy  1.285 m

Ix  1.209 m

kN
Triangle wl  0.25  WL  Ix Triangle wl  0.378  (Reffference Formula p. 111)
m

3. Mid Transom Wind Load

kN
WL  1.25
2
m
Iy  1.209 m

Ix  1.20 m

   Iy   2 
 0.5   0.5  WL  Ix  
   Ix  


 kN
Trapwl    Trapwl  0.378  (Reffference Formula p. 111)
Iy m
 
Iy  1.285 m

Ix  1.209 m

kN
Triangle wl  0.25  WL  Ix Triangle wl  0.378  (Reffference Formula p. 111)
m

4. Sill Transom Wind Load

kN
WL  1.25
2
m
Iy  1.209 m

Ix  1.20 m

   Iy   2 
 0.5   0.5  WL  Ix  
   Ix  


 kN
Trapwl    Trapwl  0.378  (Reffference Formula p. 111)
Iy m
 

16
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1
Diagram of Load

17
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

Applied Load
Top Mullion wind load : 1.25kN/m2 x 1.209m = 1.511kN//m
Bottom Mullion Wind load : 1.314kN/m (p. 15)

MULLION WL / ALLOY 6063-T6

Fcy  172 E  70000 ny  1.65 k1  0.35 k2  2.27

  F  0.5
 cy 
Bc  Fcy  1     Bc  190.113
  15510  
0.5
 Bc   Bc 
Dc       Dc  0.991
 10   E 
 Bc 
Cc  0.41  Cc  78.673
 
 Dc 
2
 Bc  Fcy 
S1   S1  130.556
 1.6  Dc 
 
2
 Cc  3
S2    S2  2.418  10
 1.6 

Other Parameters

L  2485mm
4
Ix  1181193 mm
4
Iy  383094mm

x  36mm

y  70mm

Rx  34mm

Ry  19mm
Ix 4 3
Zc   1.687  10  mm
y

4
J  314799mm

18
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

1. Check in Stress Clause 3.4.15 (SAA Aluminium Code)

Compression in Beam/ Rectangular Tubes & Box sections

Moment at mullion due to wind load Mx  1096000 N  mm (p. 89)

Mx
Bending stress at Mullion (σm) m   64.951  MPa
Zc
Lb  2485mm

Radii of gyration (Ry) Ry  19  mm

Lb  Zc
Slenderness Limit (SL) SL   241.496
0.5 Iy  J

 Fcy 
1  if SL  S1
 ny 
 
1 
  Lb  Zc 

Bc  1.6Dc   if S  S  S
1 L 2
ny   0.5 Iy  J 
  
 2
 E 
if SL  S2
  Lb  Zc  
 2.56ny   
  0.5 I  J  
  y 

1  100.29 MPa


if 1  m  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
2. Deflection

 L 
Allowable deflection (δ)   min    14.2  mm
 175 
m  8.674mm (p. 90)


if   m  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"

19
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

3. Check in Stress Clause 3.4.17 (SAA Aluminium Code)

Compression in Beam Components under Uniform Compression

Fcy  172 E  70000 ny  1.65 k1  0.35 k2  2.27

 1
 
  Fcy 
3
Bp  Fcy  1   Bp  216.08
 21.7 

1
2
 Bp   Bp 
Dp       Dp  1.201
 10   E 
 Bp  Fcy 
S1  S1  22.948
 1.6  Dp 
 

 k1  Bp 
S2  S2  39.372
 1.6  Dp 
 
b  55mm
t  4mm
b
Slenderness Limit (SL) SL  SL  13.75
t

 Fcy 
2  if SL  S1
 ny 
 
1   b 
Bp  1.6Dp    if S1  SL  S2
ny   t 
 k2  Bp  E 
 
  b   if SL  S2
 ny   1.6   
  t 

2  104.242 MPa

20
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

4. Check in Stress Clause 3.4.22 (SAA Aluminium Code)

Compression in Beam Components/ Flat Plates With Both Edges Supported
Under Bending in Own Plane
Fcy  172 E  70000 ny  1.65 k1  0.35 k2  2.27

 1
 
  Fcy 
3
Bp  Fcy  1   Bp  216.08
 21.7 

1
2
 Bp   Bp 
Dp     Dp  1.201
 10   E 
 Bp  Fcy 
S1  S1  54.802
 0.67  Dp 
 
 k1  Bp 
S2  S2  94.023
 0.67  Dp 
 
h  72mm
t  2.5mm
h
Slenderness Limit (SL) SL  SL  28.8
t
 Fcy 
3  if SL  S1
 ny 
 
1   h 
Bp  0.67Dp    if S1  SL  S2
ny   t 
 k2  Bp  E 
  if S  S
  L 2
h 
 y
n  0.67  
  t 

3  104.242 MPa

5. Stress Ratio
m
SRm  ; Use Governing Allowable Stress (Lesser Value)
min ( 1  2  3 )

SRm  0.648 < 1.0...ok

21
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

Applied Load
Mullion Bottom Frame wind load : 0.197kN/m (p. 15)

MULLION BOTTOM FRAME / ALLOY 6063-T6

Fcy  172MPa E  70000MPa ny  1.65 MPa

  F  
0.5
 cy
Bc  Fcy  1    
  15510MPa 
Bc  190.113  MPa
0.5
 Bc   Bc 
Dc      
 10   E 
Dc  0.991  MPa

 Bc 
Cc  0.41 
 
 Dc 
Cc  78.673

Other Parameters
L  1200mm
4
Ix  177285 mm
4
Iy  84838 mm

x  26mm
y  44mm
Rx  20mm
Ry  14mm
Iy 3 3
Zc   3.263  10  mm
x

22
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

1. Check in Stress Clause 3.4.12 (SAA Aluminium Code)

Compression in Beam/ Single web

Maximum moment at mullion due to wind load Mmax  1000N  mm (p. 92)
Mmax
Bending stress at mullion (σwl) m   0.306  MPa
Zc
Lb  1200mm
Radii of gyration (Ry) Ry  14  mm
Lb
Slenderness Limit (λ)    85.714
Ry

Single web beams bent about stong axis;

 Fcy 
1  if   22
 ny 
 
1   Lb 
Bc   Dc   if 22    119
ny   1.2Ry 
  
 2
 E 
  if   119
 2 
 n   Lb   
  y  1.2R   
  y  

1  72.33 MPa

if 1  m  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
2. Deflection

 L 
Allowable deflection (δ)   min    6.857  mm
 175 
m  0mm (p. 92)


if   m  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"

23
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

3. Check in Stress Clause 3.4.16 (SAA Aluminium Code)

Compression in Beam Components/ Flat Plates Supported on One Edge
Fcy  172 E  70000 ny  1.65 k1  0.35 k2  2.27

 1
 
  Fcy 
3
Bp  Fcy  1   Bp  216.08
 21.7 

1
2
 Bp   Bp 
Dp     Dp  1.201
 10   E 
 Bp  Fcy 
S1  S1  7.199
 5.1  Dp 
 

 k1  Bp 
S2  S2  12.352
 5.1  Dp 
 
b  35mm
t := 2.2mm
b
Slenderness Limit (SL) SL  SL  14
t

 Fcy 
2  if SL  S1
 ny 
 
1   b 
Bp  5.1Dp    if S1  SL  S2
ny   t 
 k2  Bp  E 
 
  b   if SL  S2
 ny   5.1   
  t 

2  74.938 MPa

24
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

4. Check in Stress Clause 3.4.22 (SAA Aluminium Code)

Compression in Beam Components/ Flat Plates With Both Edges Supported
Under Bending in Own Plane
Fcy  172 E  70000 ny  1.65 k1  0.35 k2  2.27

 1
 
  Fcy 
3
Bp  Fcy  1   Bp  216.08
 21.7 

1
2
 Bp   Bp 
Dp     Dp  1.201
 10   E 
 Bp  Fcy 
S1  S1  54.802
 0.67  Dp 
 
 k1  Bp 
S2  S2  94.023
 0.67  Dp 
 
h  30mm
t  2.2mm
h
Slenderness Limit (SL) SL  SL  13.636
t
 Fcy 
3  if SL  S1
 ny 
 
1   h 
Bp  0.67Dp    if S1  SL  S2
ny   t 
 k2  Bp  E 
  if S  S
  L 2
h 
 y
n  0.67  
  t 

3  104.242 MPa

5. Stress Ratio
m
SRm  ; Use Governing Allowable Stress (Lesser Value)
min ( 1  2  3 )

3
SRm  4.231  10 < 1.0...ok

25
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

Applied Load
Head Transom Wind Load : 0.378kN/m (p. 16)
Wind Load from reaction Mullion : 1.698kN (p. 90)
HEAD TRANSOM WL / ALLOY 6063-T6
Fcy  172 E  70000 ny  1.65

  F  0.5
 cy 
Bc  Fcy  1     Bc  190.113
  15510  
0.5
 Bc   Bc 
Dc       Dc  0.991
 10   E 
 Bc 
Cc  0.41  Cc  78.673
 
 Dc 
Bc  Fcy
S1  1.2 S1  21.938
Dc

S2  1.2 Cc S2  94.408

Other Parameters
L  2418mm
4
Ix  236616mm

4
Iy  1214145 mm

x  68mm

y  38mm
Rx  18mm

Ry  40mm
4
J  1304156 mm
Iy 4 3
Zc   1.786  10  mm
x

26
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

1. Check in Stress Clause 3.4.12 (SAA Aluminium Code)

Compression in Beam Single Web Beams Bent about Strong Axis

Moment at transom due to wind load Mx  69000N  mm (p. 96)

Mx
Bending stress at transom (σt) t   3.864  MPa
Zc
Lb  1209mm

Radii of gyration (Ry) Ry  40  mm

Lb
Slenderness Limit (SL) SL   30.225
Ry

 Fcy 
1  if SL  S1
 ny 
 
1   Lb 
Bc   Dc   if S  S  S
1 L 2
ny   
  1.2Ry 
 2
 E 
  if S  S
 2  L 2
 L
 n   b   
  y  1.2R   
  y  

1  100.096 Mpa


if 1  t  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"

2. Deflection
Allowable deflection (δ)
L  1209mm  L 
  min    6.909  mm
 175 
m  0.026mm (p. 96)


if   m  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
Allowable deflection cantilever (δc)
Lc  604.5mm  Lc 
c  min    3.358  mm
 180 

mc  0.180 mm (p. 96)


if c  mc  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"

27
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

3. Check in Stress Clause 3.4.17 (SAA Aluminium Code)

Compression in Beam Components under Uniform Compression

Fcy  172 E  70000 ny  1.65 k1  0.35 k2  2.27

 1
 
  Fcy 
3
Bp  Fcy  1   Bp  216.08
 21.7 

1
2
 Bp   Bp 
Dp       Dp  1.201
 10   E 
 Bp  Fcy 
S1  S1  22.948
 1.6  Dp 
 

 k1  Bp 
S2  S2  39.372
 1.6  Dp 
 
h  49mm
t  3mm
h
Slenderness Limit (SL) SL  SL  16.333
t

 Fcy 
2  if SL  S1
 ny 
 
1   h 
Bp  1.6Dp    if S1  SL  S2
ny   t 
 k2  Bp  E 
 
  h   if SL  S2
 ny   1.6   
  t 

2  104.242 MPa

28
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

4. Check in Stress Clause 3.4.22 (SAA Aluminium Code)

Compression in Beam Components/ Flat Plates With Both Edges Supported
Under Bending in Own Plane
Fcy  172 E  70000 ny  1.65 k1  0.35 k2  2.27

 1
 
  Fcy 
3
Bp  Fcy  1   Bp  216.08
 21.7 

1
2
 Bp   Bp 
Dp     Dp  1.201
 10   E 
 Bp  Fcy 
S1  S1  54.802
 0.67  Dp 
 

 k1  Bp 
S2  S2  94.023
 0.67  Dp 
 
b  84mm
t  3mm
b
Slenderness Limit (SL) SL  SL  28
t
 Fcy 
3  if SL  S1
 ny 
 
1   b 
Bp  0.67Dp    if S1  SL  S2
ny   t 
 k2  Bp  E 
  if S  S
  L 2
b 
 y
n  0.67  
  t 

3  104.242 MPa

5. Stress Ratio
t
SRt  ; Use Governing Allowable Stress (Lesser Value)
min ( 1  2  3 )

SRt  0.038 < 1.0...ok

29
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

Applied Load
Mid Transom Wind Load : 0.378kN/m + 0.378kN/m = 0.756kN/m (p. 16)

MID TRANSOM WL / ALLOY 6063-T6

Fcy  172 E  70000 ny  1.65 k1  0.35 k2  2.27

  F  0.5
 cy 
Bc  Fcy  1     Bc  190.113
  15510  

0.5
 Bc   Bc 
Dc       Dc  0.991
 10   E 
 Bc 
Cc  0.41  Cc  78.673
 
 Dc 
2
 Bc  Fcy 
S1   S1  130.556
 1.6  Dc 
 
2
 Cc  3
S2    S2  2.418  10
 1.6 

Other Parameters
L  1209mm
4
Ix  187086 mm
4
Iy  783788mm

x  66mm

y  48mm
Rx  16mm

Ry  32mm
4
J  787676mm
Iy 4 3
Zc   1.188  10  mm
x

30
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

1. Check in Stress Clause 3.4.15 (SAA Aluminium Code)

Compression in Beam/ Rectangular Tubes & Box sections

Moment at transom due to wind load Mx  138000N  mm (p. 98)

Mx
Bending stress at transom (σt) t   11.62  MPa
Zc
Lb  1209mm

Radii of gyration (Rx) Rx  16  mm

Lb  Zc
Slenderness Limit (SL) SL   74.803
0.5 Ix  J

 Fcy 
1  if SL  S1
 ny 
 
1 
  Lb  Zc 

Bc  1.6Dc   if S  S  S
  1 L 2
ny 0.5 Ix  J 
  
 2
 E 
if SL  S2
  Lb  Zc  
 2.56ny   
  0.5 I  J  
  x 

1  104.242 MPa


if 1  t  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
2. Deflection

Allowable deflection (δ)

Lm  1209mm
 Lm 
     6.909  mm
 175 

m  0.387mm (p. 98)


if   m  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"

31
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

3. Check in Stress Clause 3.4.17 (SAA Aluminium Code)

Compression in Beam Components under Uniform Compression

Fcy  172 E  70000 ny  1.65 k1  0.35 k2  2.27

 1
 
  Fcy 
3
Bp  Fcy  1   Bp  216.08
 21.7 

1
2
 Bp   Bp 
Dp       Dp  1.201
 10   E 
 Bp  Fcy 
S1  S1  22.948
 1.6  Dp 
 

 k1  Bp 
S2  S2  39.372
 1.6  Dp 
 
h  32mm
t  2.5mm
h
Slenderness Limit (SL) SL  SL  12.8
t

 Fcy 
2  if SL  S1
 ny 
 
1   h 
Bp  1.6Dp    if S1  SL  S2
ny   t 
 k2  Bp  E 
 
  h   if SL  S2
 ny   1.6   
  t 

2  104.242 MPa

32
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

4. Check in Stress Clause 3.4.22 (SAA Aluminium Code)

Compression in Beam Components/ Flat Plates With Both Edges Supported
Under Bending in Own Plane
Fcy  172 E  70000 ny  1.65 k1  0.35 k2  2.27

 1
 
  Fcy 
3
Bp  Fcy  1   Bp  216.08
 21.7 

1
2
 Bp   Bp 
Dp     Dp  1.201
 10   E 
 Bp  Fcy 
S1  S1  54.802
 0.67  Dp 
 

 k1  Bp 
S2  S2  94.023
 0.67  Dp 
 
b  71mm
t  2.5mm
b
Slenderness Limit (SL) SL  SL  28.4
t
 Fcy 
3  if SL  S1
 ny 
 
1   b 
Bp  0.67Dp    if S1  SL  S2
ny   t 
 k2  Bp  E 
  if S  S
  L 2
b 
 y
n  0.67  
  t 

3  104.242 MPa

5. Stress Ratio
t
SRt  ; Use Governing Allowable Stress (Lesser Value)
min ( 1  2  3 )

SRt  0.111 < 1.0...ok

33
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

Applied Load
Sill Transom wind load = 0.378kN (p. 16)
Wind load from mullion reaction = 1.968 (p. 90)
SILL TRANSOM WL / ALLOY 6063-T6
Fcy  172 E  70000 ny  1.65

  F  0.5
 cy 
Bc  Fcy  1     Bc  190.113
  15510  
0.5
 Bc   Bc 
Dc       Dc  0.991
 10   E 
 Bc 
Cc  0.41  Cc  78.673
 
 Dc 
Bc  Fcy
S1  1.2 S1  21.938
Dc

S2  1.2 Cc S2  94.408

Other Parameters
L  2418mm
4
Ix  164451 mm

4
Iy  680818mm

x  54mm

y  38mm
Rx  17mm

Ry  34mm
4
J  709383mm
Iy 4 3
Zc   1.261  10  mm
x

34
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

1. Check in Stress Clause 3.4.12 (SAA Aluminium Code)

Compression in Beam Single Web Beams Bent about Strong Axis

Moment at transom due to wind load Mx  69000N  mm (p. 99)

Mx
Bending stress at transom (σt) t   5.473  MPa
Zc
Lb  1209mm

Radii of gyration (Ry) Ry  34  mm

Lb
Slenderness Limit (SL) SL   35.559
Ry

 Fcy 
1  if SL  S1
 ny 
 
1   Lb 
Bc   Dc   if S  S  S
1 L 2
ny   1.2Ry 
  
 2
 E 
  if S  S
 2  L 2

 n   Lb  
 
  y  1.2R   
  y  

1  97.427 Mpa


if 1  t  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
2. Deflection
Allowable deflection (δ)
L  1209mm  L 
  min    6.909  mm
 175 
s  0.046mm (p. 99)


if   s  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
Allowable deflection cantilever (δc)
Lc  604.5mm  Lc 
c  min    3.358  mm
 180 

mc  0.319 mm (p. 99)


if c  mc  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"

35
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

3. Check in Stress Clause 3.4.17 (SAA Aluminium Code)

Compression in Beam Components under Uniform Compression

Fcy  172 E  70000 ny  1.65 k1  0.35 k2  2.27

 1
 
  Fcy 
3
Bp  Fcy  1   Bp  216.08
 21.7 

1
2
 Bp   Bp 
Dp     Dp  1.201
 10   E 
 Bp  Fcy 
S1  S1  22.948
 1.6  Dp 
 

 k1  Bp 
S2  S2  39.372
 1.6  Dp 
 
h  47mm
t  3mm
h
Slenderness Limit (SL) SL  SL  15.667
t

 Fcy 
2  if SL  S1
 ny 
 
1   h 
Bp  1.6Dp    if S1  SL  S2
ny   t 
 k2  Bp  E 
 
  h   if SL  S2
 ny   1.6   
  t 

2  104.242 MPa

36
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

4. Check in Stress Clause 3.4.22 (SAA Aluminium Code)

Compression in Beam Components/ Flat Plates With Both Edges Supported
Under Bending in Own Plane
Fcy  172 E  70000 ny  1.65 k1  0.35 k2  2.27

 1
 
  Fcy 
3
Bp  Fcy  1   Bp  216.08
 21.7 

1
2
 Bp   Bp 
Dp       Dp  1.201
 10   E 
 Bp  Fcy 
S1  S1  54.802
 0.67  Dp 
 

 k1  Bp 
S2  S2  94.023
 0.67  Dp 
 
b  77mm
t  3mm
b
Slenderness Limit (SL) SL  SL  25.667
t
 Fcy 
3  if SL  S1
 ny 
 
1   b 
Bp  0.67Dp    if S1  SL  S2
ny   t 
 k2  Bp  E 
  if S  S
  L 2
b 
 ny   0.67  
  t 

3  104.242 MPa

5. Stress Ratio
t
SRt  ; Use Governing Allowable Stress (Lesser Value)
min ( 1  2  3 )

SRt  0.056 < 1.0...ok

37
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

Applied Load
Sill Transom glass load : (0.245kN/m2 x 1.183m x 1.152m)/2 = 0.334/2 = 0.167kN
Sill Transom glass load : (0.245kN/m2 x 1.178m x 2.406m)/2 = 0.334/2 = 0.347kN
Devide 2 because there is 2 nos setting block
SILL TRANSOM GL / ALLOY 6063-T6
Fcy  172 E  70000 ny  1.65

  F  0.5
 cy 
Bc  Fcy  1     Bc  190.113
  15510  
0.5
 Bc   Bc 
Dc       Dc  0.991
 10   E 
 Bc 
Cc  0.41  Cc  78.673
 
 Dc 
Bc  Fcy
S1  1.2 S1  21.938
Dc

S2  1.2 Cc S2  94.408

Other Parameters
L  2418mm
4
Ix  164451 mm

4
Iy  680818mm

x  54mm

y  38mm
Rx  17mm

Ry  34mm
4
J  709383mm
Ix 3 3
Zc   4.328  10  mm
y

38
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

1. Check in Stress Clause 3.4.12 (SAA Aluminium Code)

Compression in Beam Single Web Beams Bent about Strong Axis

Moment at transom due to glass load Mx  105000N  mm (p. 100)

Mx
Bending stress at transom (σt) t   24.263  MPa
Zc
Lb  1209mm

Radii of gyration (Ry) Ry  34  mm

Lb
Slenderness Limit (SL) SL   71.118
Rx

 Fcy 
1  if SL  S1
 ny 
 
1   Lb 
Bc   Dc   if S  S  S
1 L 2
ny   1.2Rx 
  
 2
 E 
  if S  S
 2  L 2
 L
 n   b   
  y  1.2R   
  x  

1  79.634 Mpa


if 1  t  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
2. Deflection
Allowable deflection (δ)
L  1209mm  L 
  min   3mm   3  mm
 300 
m  0.944mm (p. 100)


if   m  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
Allowable deflection cantilever (δc)
Lc  604.5mm  Lc 
c  min    3.358  mm
 180 

mc  2.872 mm (p. 100)


if c  mc  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"

39
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

3. Check in Stress Clause 3.4.16 (SAA Aluminium Code)

Compression in Beam Components/ Flat Plates Supported on One Edge
Fcy  172 E  70000 ny  1.65 k1  0.35 k2  2.27

 1
 
  Fcy 
3
Bp  Fcy  1   Bp  216.08
 21.7 

1
2
 Bp   Bp 
Dp     Dp  1.201
 10   E 
 Bp  Fcy 
S1  S1  7.199
 5.1  Dp 
 

 k1  Bp 
S2  S2  12.352
 5.1  Dp 
 
b  21mm
t  3mm
b
Slenderness Limit (SL) SL  SL  7
t

 Fcy 
2  if SL  S1
 ny 
 
1   b 
Bp  5.1Dp    if S1  SL  S2
ny   t 
 k2  Bp  E 
 
  b   if SL  S2
 ny   5.1   
  t 

2  104.242 MPa

40
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

4. Check in Stress Clause 3.4.22 (SAA Aluminium Code)

Compression in Beam Components/ Flat Plates With Both Edges Supported
Under Bending in Own Plane
Fcy  172 E  70000 ny  1.65 k1  0.35 k2  2.27

 1
 
  Fcy 
3
Bp  Fcy  1   Bp  216.08
 21.7 

1
2
 Bp   Bp 
Dp     Dp  1.201
 10   E 
 Bp  Fcy 
S1  S1  54.802
 0.67  Dp 
 

 k1  Bp 
S2  S2  94.023
 0.67  Dp 
 
h  47mm
t  3mm
h
Slenderness Limit (SL) SL  SL  15.667
t
 Fcy 
3  if SL  S1
 ny 
 
1   h 
Bp  0.67Dp    if S1  SL  S2
ny   t 
 k2  Bp  E 
  if S  S
  L 2
h 
 y
n  0.67  
  t 

3  104.242 MPa

5. Stress Ratio
t
SRt  ; Use Governing Allowable Stress (Lesser Value)
min ( 1  2  3 )

SRt  0.148 < 1.0...ok

41
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

Applied Load
Wind Load : 1.25kN/m2
MULLION WINDOW FRAME WL / ALLOY 6063-T6
Fcy  172 E  70000 ny  1.65 k1  0.35 k2  2.27

  F  0.5
 cy 
Bc  Fcy  1     Bc  190.113
  15510  
0.5
 Bc   Bc 
Dc       Dc  0.991
 10   E 
 Bc 
Cc  0.41  Cc  78.673
 
 Dc 
2
 Bc  Fcy 
S1   S1  130.556
 1.6  Dc 
 
2
 Cc  3
S2    S2  2.418  10
 1.6 

Other Parameters

L  1245mm
4
Ix  157709 mm
4
Iy  51578 mm

x  18mm

y  42mm

Rx  19mm

Ry  11mm
Ix 3 3
Zc   3.755  10  mm
y
4
J  39632mm

42
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

1. Check in Stress Clause 3.4.15 (SAA Aluminium Code)

Compression in Beam/ Rectangular Tubes & Box sections

Moment at mullion due to wind load -1.25 kPa Mx  154000N  mm (p. 103)
Mx
Bending stress at Mullion (σm) m   41.012  MPa
Zc
Lb  1245mm

Radii of gyration (Ry) Ry  11  mm

Lb  Zc
Slenderness Limit (SL) SL   85.677
0.5 Iy  J

 Fcy 
1  if SL  S1
 ny 
 
1 
  Lb  Zc 

Bc  1.6Dc   if S  S  S
  1 L 2
ny 0.5 Iy  J 
  
 2
 E 
if SL  S2
  Lb  Zc  
 2.56ny   
  0.5 I  J  
  y 

1  104.242 MPa

if 1  m  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
2. Deflection

 L 
Allowable deflection (δ)   min    7.114  mm
 175 
m  2.634mm (p. 103)


if   m  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"

43
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

3. Check in Stress Clause 3.4.17 (SAA Aluminium Code)

Compression in Beam Components under Uniform Compression

Fcy  172 E  70000 ny  1.65 k1  0.35 k2  2.27

 1
 
  Fcy 
3
Bp  Fcy  1   Bp  216.08
 21.7 

1
2
 Bp   Bp 
Dp       Dp  1.201
 10   E 
 Bp  Fcy 
S1  S1  22.948
 1.6  Dp 
 

 k1  Bp 
S2  S2  39.372
 1.6  Dp 
 
b  25mm
t  2.5mm
b
Slenderness Limit (SL) SL  SL  10
t

 Fcy 
2  if SL  S1
 ny 
 
1   b 
Bp  1.6Dp    if S1  SL  S2
ny   t 
 k2  Bp  E 
 
  b   if SL  S2
 ny   1.6   
  t 

2  104.242 MPa

44
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

4. Check in Stress Clause 3.4.22 (SAA Aluminium Code)

Compression in Beam Components/ Flat Plates With Both Edges Supported
Under Bending in Own Plane
Fcy  172 E  70000 ny  1.65 k1  0.35 k2  2.27

 1
 
  Fcy 
3
Bp  Fcy  1   Bp  216.08
 21.7 

1
2
 Bp   Bp 
Dp     Dp  1.201
 10   E 
 Bp  Fcy 
S1  S1  54.802
 0.67  Dp 
 

 k1  Bp 
S2  S2  94.023
 0.67  Dp 
 
h  29mm
t  2.5mm
h
Slenderness Limit (SL) SL  SL  11.6
t
 Fcy 
3  if SL  S1
 ny 
 
1   h 
Bp  0.67Dp    if S1  SL  S2
ny   t 
 k2  Bp  E 
  if S  S
  L 2
h 
 y
n  0.67  
  t 

3  104.242 MPa

5. Stress Ratio
m
SRm  ; Use Governing Allowable Stress (Lesser Value)
min ( 1  2  3 )

SRm  0.348 < 1.0...ok

45
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

Applied Load
Glass Load : (0.245kN/m2 x 1.197m x 1.208m)/2 = 1.77kN
Self Weight
MULLION WINDOW FRAME GL / ALLOY 6063-T6
Fcy  172 E  70000 ny  1.65 k1  0.35 k2  2.27

  F  0.5
 cy 
Bc  Fcy  1     Bc  190.113
  15510  

0.5
 Bc   Bc 
Dc       Dc  0.991
 10   E 
 Bc 
Cc  0.41  Cc  78.673
 
 Dc 
2
 Bc  Fcy 
S1   S1  130.556
 1.6  Dc 
 
2
 Cc  3
S2    S2  2.418  10
 1.6 

Other Parameters
L  1245mm
4
Ix  157709 mm
4
Iy  51578 mm

x  18mm

y  42mm

Rx  19mm

Ry  11mm
Iy 3 3
Zc   2.865  10  mm
x
4
J  39632mm

46
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

1. Check in Stress Clause 3.4.15 (SAA Aluminium Code)

Compression in Beam/ Rectangular Tubes & Box sections

Moment at transom due to glass load Mx  10000N  mm (p. 104)

Mx
Bending stress at transom (σt) t   3.49  MPa
Zc
Lb  1245mm
Radii of gyration (Ry) Ry  11  mm
Lb  Zc
Slenderness Limit (SL) SL   157.811
0.5 Iy  J

 Fcy 
1  if SL  S1
 ny 
 
1 
  Lb  Zc 

Bc  1.6Dc   if S  S  S
  1 L 2
ny 0.5 Iy  J 
  
 2
 E 
if SL  S2
  Lb  Zc  
 2.56ny   
  0.5 I  J  
  y 

1  103.151 MPa


if 1  t  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
2. Deflection

Allowable deflection (δ)

 L 
  min   3mm   3  mm
 300 
m  0.168 mm (p. 105)


if   m  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"

47
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

3. Check in Stress Clause 3.4.16 (SAA Aluminium Code)

Compression in Beam Components/ Flat Plates Supported on One Edge
Fcy  172 E  70000 ny  1.65 k1  0.35 k2  2.27

 1
 
  Fcy 
3
Bp  Fcy  1   Bp  216.08
 21.7 

1
2
 Bp   Bp 
Dp     Dp  1.201
 10   E 
 Bp  Fcy 
S1  S1  7.199
 5.1  Dp 
 

 k1  Bp 
S2  S2  12.352
 5.1  Dp 
 
h  41mm
t  2.5mm
h
Slenderness Limit (SL) SL  SL  16.4
t

 Fcy 
2  if SL  S1
 ny 
 
1   h 
Bp  5.1Dp    if S1  SL  S2
ny   t 
 k2  Bp  E 
 
  h   if SL  S2
 ny   5.1   
  t 

2  63.971 MPa

48
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

3. Check in Stress Clause 3.4.22 (SAA Aluminium Code)

Compression in Beam Components/ Flat Plates With Both Edges Supported
Under Bending in Own Plane
Fcy  172 E  70000 ny  1.65 k1  0.35 k2  2.27

 1
 
  Fcy 
3
Bp  Fcy  1   Bp  216.08
 21.7 

1
2
 Bp   Bp 
Dp     Dp  1.201
 10   E 
 Bp  Fcy 
S1  S1  54.802
 0.67  Dp 
 

 k1  Bp 
S2  S2  94.023
 0.67  Dp 
 
b  19mm
t  2.5mm
b
Slenderness Limit (SL) SL  SL  7.6
t
 Fcy 
3  if SL  S1
 ny 
 
1   b 
Bp  0.67Dp    if S1  SL  S2
ny   t 
 k2  Bp  E 
  if S  S
  L 2
b 
 y
n  0.67  
  t 

3  104.242 MPa

5. Stress Ratio
t
SRt  ; Use Governing Allowable Stress (Lesser Value)
min ( 1  2  3 )

SRt  0.036 < 1.0...ok

49
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

Applied Load
Wind Load : 1.25kN/m2
TRANSOM WINDOW FRAME WL / ALLOY 6063-T6
Fcy  172 E  70000 ny  1.65 k1  0.35 k2  2.27

  F  0.5
 cy 
Bc  Fcy  1     Bc  190.113
  15510  

0.5
 Bc   Bc 
Dc       Dc  0.991
 10   E 
 Bc 
Cc  0.41  Cc  78.673
 
 Dc 
2
 Bc  Fcy 
S1   S1  130.556
 1.6  Dc 
 
2
 Cc  3
S2    S2  2.418  10
 1.6 

Other Parameters
L  1209mm
4
Ix  51577mm
4
Iy  157707 mm

x  43mm

y  18mm
Rx  11mm

Ry  19mm
4
J  169654mm
Iy 3 3
Zc   3.668  10  mm
x

50
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

1. Check in Stress Clause 3.4.15 (SAA Aluminium Code)

Compression in Beam/ Rectangular Tubes & Box sections

Moment at transom due to wind load Mx  108000N  mm (p. 103)

Mx
Bending stress at transom (σt) t   29.447  MPa
Zc
Lb  1209mm

Radii of gyration (Rx) Rx  11  mm

Lb  Zc
Slenderness Limit (SL) SL   94.804
0.5 Ix  J

 Fcy 
1  if SL  S1
 ny 
 
1 
  Lb  Zc 

Bc  1.6Dc   if S  S  S
  1 L 2
ny 0.5 Ix  J 
  
 2
 E 
if SL  S2
  Lb  Zc  
 2.56ny   
  0.5 I  J  
  x 

1  104.242 MPa


if 1  t  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
2. Deflection

Allowable deflection (δ)

L  1209mm
 L 
     6.909  mm
 175 

m  0.628mm (p. 103)


if   m  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"

51
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

3. Check in Stress Clause 3.4.17 (SAA Aluminium Code)

Compression in Beam Components under Uniform Compression

Fcy  172 E  70000 ny  1.65 k1  0.35 k2  2.27

 1
 
  Fcy 
3
Bp  Fcy  1   Bp  216.08
 21.7 

1
2
 Bp   Bp 
Dp       Dp  1.201
 10   E 
 Bp  Fcy 
S1  S1  22.948
 1.6  Dp 
 

 k1  Bp 
S2  S2  39.372
 1.6  Dp 
 
h  25mm
t  2.5mm
h
Slenderness Limit (SL) SL  SL  10
t

 Fcy 
2  if SL  S1
 ny 
 
1   h 
Bp  1.6Dp    if S1  SL  S2
ny   t 
 k2  Bp  E 
 
  h   if SL  S2
 ny   1.6   
  t 

2  104.242 MPa

52
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

4. Check in Stress Clause 3.4.22 (SAA Aluminium Code)

Compression in Beam Components/ Flat Plates With Both Edges Supported
Under Bending in Own Plane
Fcy  172 E  70000 ny  1.65 k1  0.35 k2  2.27

 1
 
  Fcy 
3
Bp  Fcy  1   Bp  216.08
 21.7 

1
2
 Bp   Bp 
Dp     Dp  1.201
 10   E 
 Bp  Fcy 
S1  S1  54.802
 0.67  Dp 
 

 k1  Bp 
S2  S2  94.023
 0.67  Dp 
 
b  29mm
t  2.5mm
b
Slenderness Limit (SL) SL  SL  11.6
t
 Fcy 
3  if SL  S1
 ny 
 
1   b 
Bp  0.67Dp    if S1  SL  S2
ny   t 
 k2  Bp  E 
  if S  S
  L 2
b 
 y
n  0.67  
  t 

3  104.242 MPa

5. Stress Ratio
t
SRt  ; Use Governing Allowable Stress (Lesser Value)
min ( 1  2  3 )

SRt  0.362 < 1.0...ok

53
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

Applied Load
Glass Load : (0.245kN/m2 x 1.197m x 1.208m)/2 = 0.177kN
Self Weight
TRANSOM WINDOW FRAME GL / ALLOY 6063-T6
Fcy  172 E  70000 ny  1.65 k1  0.35 k2  2.27

  F  0.5
 cy 
Bc  Fcy  1     Bc  190.113
  15510  

0.5
 Bc   Bc 
Dc       Dc  0.991
 10   E 
 Bc 
Cc  0.41  Cc  78.673
 
 Dc 
2
 Bc  Fcy 
S1   S1  130.556
 1.6  Dc 
 
2
 Cc  3
S2    S2  2.418  10
 1.6 

Other Parameters
L  1209mm
4
Ix  51577mm
4
Iy  157707 mm

x  43mm

y  19mm
Rx  11mm

Ry  19mm
4
J  169654mm
Ix 3 3
Zc   2.715  10  mm
y

54
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

1. Check in Stress Clause 3.4.15 (SAA Aluminium Code)

Compression in Beam/ Rectangular Tubes & Box sections

Moment at transom due to glass load Mx  10000N  mm (p. 103)

Mx
Bending stress at transom (σt) t   3.684  MPa
Zc
Lb  1209mm
Radii of gyration (Ry) Ry  19  mm
Lb  Zc
Slenderness Limit (SL) SL   40.128
0.5 Iy  J

 Fcy 
1  if SL  S1
 ny 
 
1 
  Lb  Zc 

Bc  1.6Dc   if S  S  S
  1 L 2
ny 0.5 Iy  J 
  
 2
 E 
if SL  S2
  Lb  Zc  
 2.56ny   
  0.5 I  J  
  y 

1  104.242 MPa


if 1  t  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
2. Deflection

Allowable deflection (δ)

L  1209mm

 L 
  min   1.5mm   1.5  mm
 300 
m  0.264mm (p.103)


if   m  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"

55
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

3. Check in Stress Clause 3.4.16 (SAA Aluminium Code)

Compression in Beam Components/ Flat Plates Supported on One Edge
Fcy  172 E  70000 ny  1.65 k1  0.35 k2  2.27

 1
 
  Fcy 
3
Bp  Fcy  1   Bp  216.08
 21.7 

1
2
 Bp   Bp 
Dp     Dp  1.201
 10   E 
 Bp  Fcy 
S1  S1  7.199
 5.1  Dp 
 

 k1  Bp 
S2  S2  12.352
 5.1  Dp 
 
b  34mm
t  2.5mm
b
Slenderness Limit (SL) SL  SL  13.6
t

 Fcy 
2  if SL  S1
 ny 
 
1   b 
Bp  5.1Dp    if S1  SL  S2
ny   t 
 k2  Bp  E 
 
  b   if SL  S2
 ny   5.1   
  t 

2  77.142 MPa

56
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

4. Check in Stress Clause 3.4.22 (SAA Aluminium Code)

Compression in Beam Components/ Flat Plates With Both Edges Supported
Under Bending in Own Plane
Fcy  172 E  70000 ny  1.65 k1  0.35 k2  2.27

 1
 
  Fcy 
3
Bp  Fcy  1   Bp  216.08
 21.7 

1
2
 Bp   Bp 
Dp     Dp  1.201
 10   E 
 Bp  Fcy 
S1  S1  54.802
 0.67  Dp 
 

 k1  Bp 
S2  S2  94.023
 0.67  Dp 
 
h  25mm
t  2.5mm
h
Slenderness Limit (SL) SL  SL  10
t
 Fcy 
3  if SL  S1
 ny 
 
1   h 
Bp  0.67Dp    if S1  SL  S2
ny   t 
 k2  Bp  E 
  if S  S
  L 2
h 
 y
n  0.67  
  t 

3  104.242 MPa

5. Stress Ratio
t
SRt  ; Use Governing Allowable Stress (Lesser Value)
min ( 1  2  3 )

SRt  0.029 < 1.0...ok

57
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

VI. CAST IN CHANNEL

Top Cast in Channel/Use 2 nos T-Bolt

FWLTop = PWLTop*sf = 2.155kN *1.4 = 3.017kN (p. 97)
PDLTop =(Weight of Mullion + Wight of Bottom Frame + Weight of Frame Mullion + Weight Head Frame + Weight of
Mid FrameWeight of Head Transom + Weight of Mid Transom + Weight of Top Glass)/2 + (Weight of Mullion + Weight
of Head Transom)/2 = 341N (p. 14)
FDLTop = PDLTop*sf = 0.341kN*2 = 0.682kN

58
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

59
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

60
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

61
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

62
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

63
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

64
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

65
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

Bottom Cast in Channel/Use 2 nos T-Bolt

FWLBottom = PWLBottom*sf = 2.155kN *1.4 = 3.017kN (p. 101)
PDLBottom = (Weight of Bottom Glass + Weight of Sill Transom)/2 + (Weight of Glass + Weight of Sill Transom)/2
= 545N (p. 14)
FDLBotoom = PDLBottom*sf = 0.545kN*2 = 1.09kN

66
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

67
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

68
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

69
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

70
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

71
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

72
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

VII. FIXING & CONNECTIONS

TOP CONNECTION
FWLTop = PWLTop = 2155N (p. 97)
PDLTop =(Weight of Mullion + Wight of Bottom Frame + Weight of Frame Mullion + Weight Head Frame + Weight of
Mid FrameWeight of Head Transom + Weight of Mid Transom + Weight of Top Glass)/2 + (Weight of Mullion + Weight
of Head Transom)/2 = 341N (p. 14)

CONNECTION A
nbracket  2
nbolt  2
dbolt  8mm
tplate  3mm

sf w  1.4
sf d  2

Aluminium Plate U/Alloy 6061-T6

2 2 3
Rforce  Fwl  Fdl  2.182  10 N

N
allow  242.42
2
mm
Rforce N
Bearing Stress,
 
nbracket nbolt dbolt tplate
 22.727
2

if allow    "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
mm

Bolt & Nut M-8 Grade A2/70


 Fwl  sfw2  Fdl sfd2 3
Rforceb   1.547  10 N
nbolt

Properties bolt & nut M-8 Grade A2/70 (p. )

2
As  36.6 mm

73
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

N
Pab  700
2
mm

N
 shear  311
2
mm

N
bearing  828
2
mm

Shear Capacity, P   shear  As  1.138  10  N

4

if P  Rforceb  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
Rforceb N
Shear Stress,
 
As
 42.256 
2

if  shear    "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
mm

Bearing Capacity, P  bearing  As  3.03  10  N

4

if P  Rforceb  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
Rforceb N
Bearing Stress,
 
As
 42.256 
2

if bearing    "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
mm

CONNECTION B
nbracket  2
nscrew  3
tplate  3mm
dscrew  4mm
sf w  1.4
sf d  2

Aluminium Plate /Alloy 6061-T6

2 2 3
Rforce  Fwl  Fdl  2.182  10 N

N
allow  242.42
2
mm
Rforce N
Bearing Stress,
 
nbracket nscrew dscrew tplate
 30.303 
2

if allow    "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
mm

Screw M-4 Grade A2/70


 Fwl  sfw2  Fdl sfd2 3
Rforces   1.031  10 N
nscrew

Properties Screw M-4 Grade A2/70 (p. )

2
As  8.78 mm

74
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

N
Pab  700
2
mm

N
 shear  311
2
mm

N
bearing  828 
2
mm

Shear Capacity, P   shear  As  2.731  10  N

3

if P  Rforces  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
Rforces N
Shear Stress,
 
As
 117.431 
2

if  shear    "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
mm

Bearing Capacity, P  bearing  As  7.27  10  N

3

if P  Rforces  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
Rforces N
Bearing Stress,
 
As
 117.431 
2

if bearing    "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
mm

CONNECTION C
nwasher  2
nbolt  1
nscrew  2
dbolt  10mm
tplate  3mm
sf w  1.4

Aluminium Washer/Alloy 6061-T6

N
 allow  83.64
2
mm
Fwl N
Shear Stress WL,
 w 
nwasher nbolt dbolt tplate
 35.917 
2

if  allow   w  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
mm

Screw M-4 A2/70

Fwl  sfw 3
Pwl   1.508  10 N
nscrew

Properties Screw M-4 Grade A2/70 (p. )

2
As  8.78 mm

75
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

N
Pab  700
2
mm

N
 screw  311
2
mm

N
screw  450
2
mm

Shear Capacity WL, Ps   screw  As  2.731  10  N

3

if Ps  Pwl  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
Pwl N
Shear Stress WL,
 s 
As
 171.811 
2

if  shear   s  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
mm

76
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

OPENABLE WINDOW HINGE

Fwl = 1359N (p. 105)
Fdl = 415N (p. 105)

Due Wind Load

4
Iy  29595 mm
x  25mm
a  32mm
Iy 3 3
Zy   1.184  10 mm
x
N
stress  146
2
mm
4
Mwl  Pwl  a  4.349  10 N  mm

Mwl N
Bending Stress, wl 
Zy
 36.736
2

if stress  wl  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
mm

Due Dead Load

4
Ix  159 mm
y  3mm
b  14mm
Ix 3
Zx   53 mm
y
N
stress  146
2
mm
3
Mdl  Pdl  b  5.81  10 N  mm

Mdl N
Bending Stress, wl 
Zx
 109.623
2

if stress  wl  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
mm

77
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

BOTTOM CONNECTION
FWLBottom = 2155N (p. 101)
FDLBottom = (Weight of Bottom Glass + Weight of Sill Transom)/2 + (Weight of Glass + Weight of Sill Transom)/2
= 545N (p. 14)

CONNECTION A
nbracket  2
nbolt  2
dbolt  8mm
tplate  3mm

sf w  1.4
sf d  2

Aluminium Plate U/Alloy 6061-T6

2 2 3
Rforce  Fwl  Fdl  2.223  10 N

N
allow  242.42
2
mm
Rforce N
Bearing Stress,
 
nbracket nbolt dbolt tplate
 23.155 
2

if allow    "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
mm

Bolt & Nut M-8 Grade A2/70


 Fwl  sfw2  Fdl sfd2 3
Rforceb   1.604  10 N
nbolt

Properties bolt & nut M-8 Grade A2/70 (p. )

2
As  36.6 mm
N
Pab  700
2
mm
78
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

N
 shear  311
2
mm

N
bearing  828
2
mm

Shear Capacity, P   shear  As  1.138  10  N

4

if P  Rforceb  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
Rforceb N
Shear Stress,
 
As
 43.823 
2

if  shear    "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
mm

Bearing Capacity, P  bearing  As  3.03  10  N

4

if P  Rforceb  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
Rforceb N
Bearing Stress,
 
As
 43.823 
2

if bearing    "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
mm

CONNECTION B
nbracket  2
nscrew  3
tplate  3mm
dscrew  4mm
sf w  1.4
sf d  2

Aluminium Plate /Alloy 6061-T6

2 2 3
Rforce  Fwl  Fdl  2.223  10 N

N
allow  242.42
2
mm
Rforce N
Bearing Stress,
 
nbracket nscrew dscrew tplate
 30.873
2

if allow    "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
mm

Screw M-4 Grade A2/70


 Fwl  sfw2  Fdl sfd2 3
Rforces   1.069  10 N
nscrew

Properties Screw M-4 Grade A2/70 (p. )

2
As  8.78 mm

N
Pab  700
2
mm

79
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

N
 shear  311
2
mm

N
bearing  828 
2
mm

Shear Capacity, P   shear  As  2.731  10  N

3

if P  Rforces  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
Rforces N
Shear Stress,
 
As
 121.787 
2

if  shear    "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
mm

Bearing Capacity, P  bearing  As  7.27  10  N

3

if P  Rforces  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
Rforces N
Bearing Stress,
 
As
 121.787
2

if bearing    "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
mm

CONNECTION C
nwasher  2
nbolt  1
nscrew  2
dbolt  10mm
tplate  3mm
sf w  1.4

Aluminium Washer/Alloy 6061-T6

N
 allow  83.64
2
mm
Fwl N
Shear Stress WL,
 w 
nwasher nbolt dbolt tplate
 35.917 
2

if  allow   w  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
mm

Screw M-4 A2/70

Fwl  sfw 3
Pwl   1.508  10 N
nscrew

Properties Screw M-4 Grade A2/70 (p. )

2
As  8.78 mm

N
Pab  700
2
mm

80
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

N
 screw  311
2
mm

N
screw  450
2
mm

Shear Capacity WL, Ps   screw  As  2.731  10  N

3

if Ps  Pwl  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
Pwl N
Shear Stress WL,
 s 
As
 171.811 
2

if  shear   s  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
mm

81
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

MID CONNECTION
FWLMid = 457N (p. 98)
FDLMid = 26N (p. 98)

CONNECTION A
nbracket  2
nscrew  2
dscrew  4mm
tplate  2mm

sf w  1.4
sf d  2

Aluminium Plate /Alloy 6061-T6

2 2
Rforce  Fwl  Fdl  457.739N

N
allow  242.42
2
mm
Rforce N
Bearing Stress,
 
nbracket nscrew dscrew tplate
 14.304 
2

if allow    "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
mm

Screw M-4 Grade A2/70


 Fwl  sfw2  Fdl sfd2
Rforces   320.955 N
nscrew

Properties Screw M-4 Grade A2/70 (p. )

2
As  8.78 mm

82
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

N
Pab  700
2
mm

N
 shear  311
2
mm

N
bearing  828
2
mm

Shear Capacity, P   shear  As  2.731  10  N

3

if P  Rforces  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
Rforces N
Shear Stress,
 
As
 36.555 
2

if  shear    "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
mm

Bearing Capacity, P  bearing  As  7.27  10  N

3

if P  Rforces  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
Rforces N
Bearing Stress,
 
As
 36.555 
2

if bearing    "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
mm

CONNECTION B
nbracket  2
nscrew  2
tplate  7mm
dscrew  4mm
sf w  1.4
sf d  2

Aluminium Plate /Alloy 6061-T6

2 2
Rforce  Fwl  Fdl  457.739N

N
allow  242.42
2
mm
Rforce N
Bearing Stress,
 
nbracket nscrew dscrew tplate
 4.087 
2

if allow    "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
mm

Screw M-4 Grade A2/70


 Fwl  sfw2  Fdl sfd2
Rforces   320.955 N
nscrew

Properties Screw M-4 Grade A2/70 (p. )

2
As  8.78 mm

83
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

N
Pab  700
2
mm

N
 shear  311
2
mm

N
bearing  828 
2
mm

Shear Capacity, P   shear  As  2.731  10  N

3

if P  Rforces  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
Rforces N
Shear Stress,
 
As
 36.555 
2

if  shear    "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
mm

Bearing Capacity, P  bearing  As  7.27  10  N

3

if P  Rforces  "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
Rforces N
Bearing Stress,
 
As
 36.555 
2

if bearing    "ok"  "not ok"   "ok"
mm

84
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

VIII. APPENDIX

85
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

86
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

87
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

88
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

89
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

90
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

91
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

92
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

93
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

94
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

95
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

96
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

97
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

98
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

99
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

100
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

101
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

102
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

103
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

104
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

105
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

106
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

107
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

108
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

109
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

110
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

111
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

112
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

113
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

114
 Window Wall Analysis
Tokyu Mega Kuningan – Jakarta
IDX-TMKP-CAL-0005
R.1

115