Professional Documents
Culture Documents
My Project
My Project
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER NO: 01
1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Meaning
1.1.1 Education
Education is being considered a key to change and progress. Progress and prosperity of the
country depends on the kind of education that is provided to the people.
Education is the process of facilitating learning, or the acquisition
of knowledge, skills, values, beliefs, and habits. Educational methods
include teaching, training, storytelling, discussion and directed research. Education frequently
takes place under the guidance of educators, however learners can also educate themselves.
Education can take place in formal or informal settings and any experience that has a formative
effect on the way one thinks, feels, or acts may be considered educational. The methodology of
teaching is called pedagogy.
Formal education is commonly divided formally into such stages
as preschool or kindergarten, primary school, secondary school and then college, university,
or apprenticeship.
A right to education has been recognized by some governments and the United Nations. In most
regions, education is compulsory up to a certain age. There is a movement for education reform,
and in particular for evidence-based education.
2
students should know. Performance standards describe what level of performance is good
enough for students to be described as advanced, proficient, below basic, or by some other
performance level.
Usually educational standard stands for quality of education. Quality has been the goal of
an eternal quest through the corridors of human history. It has been the divining force of all
human endeavors. Concerning standard or quality of education the Marmar Mukhopadhyay
(2005) clears that defining quality of education is a challenge since it deals with the most
sensitive creation on earth, the human beings. Industrial products are finished goods, but
education has no such finished product, nor even the graduates.
Educational standards of India have been a burning issue among the educationalists since
independence. Every member of the society has its own views concern the educational standards
in India. Although every government tried its best to raise the standards of education but their
efforts were mainly limited to preparing only educational policies in papers. We could not find
practical implementation of their recommendations regarding standards of education in India. In
the more vast sense a standard is anything used to measure, for example a standard of conduct, a
standard of weight or length.
Actually a standard is a thing which has been used as a model to which objects or actions
may be compared. The standard of education is defined in encyclopedia of education (1985) in
the following sense:
“In the education context, then, standards should be regarded as objectives to be achieved
or expectations of desirable attitude or levels of performance”
For more defining the standard of education, we actually have to provide the answers of
some questions, like which types of aims regarding education are considered in the current
educational system? How these aims are set? To what extent these aims are achieved? How
much these aims are related with the society? Which principles are considered while planning
curriculum? Which teaching method can be suitable according to the age and psychological need
of the child? By providing the answers of these questions we can describe the standards of
education easily. The present education system of India has failed to disclose before the new
generation the founding reasons of India. Musa khan Jalalzai (2005) stated that the disastrous
results of this negligence are now evident in every walk of life. The responsibility for this
deterioration lies with influential factions and those in power. The most alarming aspect besides
3
ideological confusion and moral degradation is the falling standard of education. Due to constant
decay India educational document are now no more acceptable abroad.
4
Deteriorate is defined as to make or become worse or lower in value or quality.
“The standard of education in India is deteriorating day by day. We have to provide scope and
ensure quality education. A number of Asian countries cutting across their political ideology
have advanced a lot in the education sector,” Sen said, addressing a meeting organised
by Pratichi Trust here.
“The political leaders’ attention towards quality education is an important factor. On the other
hand the common people must demand for it,” he said.
5
2. Interrelationship of life and education: The different situations and strange incidents that
occurs in our life and education, both of them influences our life to a great extent. Therefore, we
can call life is as education and education is as life.
6. Education plays significant role in social conservation: Every society has it’s own rites and
rituals, ethics, morality, language, culture, beliefs, etc. Education helps the society to conserve
them.
8. Education is a socializing process: Every society has it’s own moral values. With the help of
education people can develop these moral values. Therefore, it is termed as socializing process.
9. Education brings about desirable change in human behavior: Education brings change of
human behavior in a desired way. Good and ethical behavior makes us a good person and helps
in our development.
6
10. Education is the power to make adjustment in new situations: Education gives us
strength to solve the difficult problems that we have faced in our life.
7
the light of growing evidence, a means for achieving the universal access and equity of education
regardless of gender, location, race, religion, and social class (Hoy, et al, 2000). The World Bank
(1997) in one of its reports on elementary education in India has also laid equal emphasis on the
expansion of access and quality as the quality has been visualized instrumental in improving
access. The report states:
"The best way to improve access is to improve quality which would make coming to school or
staying in school a more attractive option from the perspective of parents as well as children.
Moreover, effort to improve quality will tend to increase the efficiency of the public expenditure
and will encourage parents to contribute to children education."
Quality of education also means setting standards which make a pavement for assessment of
standards, comparability of programs, and accountability for meeting the targets.
8
Unfortunately, there appears to be a gap in the research identifying which
leadership styles or techniques and strategies are more effective in dealing with causes of
deteriorating standard of education before the dispute escalates to more extreme behavior
requiring disciplinary action.
ii. The study was conducted on the employees and teaching staff of public school in city
Indore.
9
iv. Five point agreement scales presented by likert.
Finally, this study was conducted under strict time constraints: within a four to five month period
and reseach was carried out only on public schools in Indore City, data collection is difficult
from the govt. employees and teaching staff of education department because of their busy
routine. Many other areas were remaining untouched due to limited resources and as a female
constraint at some time I face problems regarding data collection.
10
2
LITERATURE REVIEW
CHAPTER NO: 02
REVIEW OF THE RELATED LITERATURE
11
School education provides a pathway to higher education. Students join school, college
and university level education with the learning concepts which they gain at school level. The
concepts, students learn at school level help in understanding advance form of these concepts at
higher education level. If students got sophisticated concepts at this level, ultimately, will work
smartly in higher education. This is possible only through quality education. Presently, Quality
education is need of the time. In India, school education is suffering due to many reasons.
Teachers’ education, curriculum and basic facilities are the pillars of quality education, and in
India all these are criticized on many forums. A particularly evident relationship between state
power and the schools is manifested through the widespread prevalence of education enforced by
the state of India. It is a process of segregation that serves to maintain inequality (Rehman,
2004). Restricted access, education quality, syllabus and curriculum constructed as other
symptoms of conflict indirectly elicited by the State. Similar issues prevalent in Indore today - be
it poverty, feudalism, political violence, discrimination and injustice - represent the nature of
education which perpetuate conflict in the province.
School is a place which prepares young children for future. School education provides
base foundation for higher learning and the skills which are needed for practical life. School’s
experiences remain unique in the whole life of a student. College and university education
depend upon learning of school. Students join the fields of practical life with the taste which
develop at school level. School education tells a student how to think? How to manage life and
how to organize the scattered concepts? Students enter school, college or university with all
round capabilities and higher learning polish these capabilities and prepare leadership force for
different fields of life.
Sadker and Sadker (2000, p.203), quoted Hilda, a highly regarded educator, said
“learning in school differs from learning in life in that it is formally organized. It is the special
function of the school to so arrange the experiences of children and youth that desirable learning
takes place”.
Quality School education provides such skills and knowledge which are necessary for
further education. The World Education Forum, Dakar Framework of Action (2000) Emphasis
on quality of education is included as one of the six goals:
12
“Improving all aspects of the quality of education, and ensuring their excellence of all so that
recognized and measurable learning outcomes are achieved by all especially in literacy,
numeracy and essential life skills” (Article 7(vi))
The single most important factor that impacts the future of the country and its young population
is access to quality education. Education is the level, and its quality and access to it are the main
attributes to be applied for India to achieve great financial and social development (Xhaferri &
Iqbal, 2010). National Education policy (2009, p. 42) stated that defining quality is elusive but
some parameters will need to be drawn. There is an impending need to debate and agree on what
constitute quality at each stage of education and the system overall.
Teachers
Teachers are the most important element in the whole educational system of a country.
Without quality teachers, quality education is only a dream. Quality education can be achieved
through quality teachers. The
“World Declaration on Education for All “describes the role of teacher as:
The pre-eminent role of teachers as well as of other educational personnel in providing
quality education needs to be recognized and developed to optimize their contribution ……
improve their working conditions and status notably in respect to the recruitment, initial and in-
service training, remuneration and career developmentpossibilities." (Article 1.6 para 33, p. 58).
National Education Commission (1959) documented that no education system is better
than its teachers. Memon (2007) is of the view that Teachers are perhaps the most critical
component of any system of education. It is also said that teachers join their job without required
skills and pedagogies. Even after joining teaching as a profession, teachers do not show interest
in their jobs and think that once they become a teacher, now they are teachers forever.
Association for Teacher Education in Europe (2006) describes in its policy paper entitled “the
quality of teachers” that the quality of teachers affects both the quality of schools and the
learning of pupils.
Curriculum
13
Curriculum of teacher training and curriculum of school education are criticized within
India. It is common perception that curriculum of teacher training is old and does not fulfill the
requirements of the technological era. Teachers learn this curriculum only for degree, not for
knowledge. School curriculum does not prepare the students for the market. Students rote
selected topics and appear in the examination. When these students come in market place with
degrees, face many problems and found unable to fulfill the requirements of work place. Baloch
(2003, p.192) describe the condition of present school curriculum as: It is obvious that all the
educational objectives are concerned with the development of the individual and with the quality
of his behavior in various life situations. The school curriculum must center, therefore, on the
individual in his social environment. Our present curriculum is centered on textbooks and
subjects. Our whole educational practice primarily aims at teaching the texts and developing the
subjects.
National Education Policy (2009, p. 35) tells that quality is the most central strategic
education policy priority and painted that Ministry of Education has adopted following vision:
Our education system must provide quality education to our children and youth to enable them to
realize their individual potential and contribute to development of society and nation, creating a
sense of Indiai nationhood, the concept of tolerance, social justice, democracy, their regional and
local culture and history based on the basic ideology enunciated in the constitution of the Islamic
Republic of India. (p.17)
Basic facilities
Basic facilities like school building, electricity, laboratories drinking water are necessities for
education. Without these facilities education is very difficult. For quality education, these
facilities are compulsory. Inadequate facilities are one of the challenges in the way of quality
education.
Education Sector Reforms (2002) describes the following strategies for quality improvement at
all levels:
14
1. Benchmarking competencies.
2. Continuous improvement of curricula.
3. Staff development, teacher education and training, and professional development of planners,
managers and staff at all levels.
4. Establishment of National Educational Assessment System (NEAS).
5. Strengthening the Teacher Training institutions.
6. Setting Academic Audit through linkage of grants/incentives with quality.
7. Increase of non-salary budget for provision of conducive educational environmental.
8. District based educational planning and implementation under the Devolution Plan.
9. Public-private partnership and community participation.
India Economic Survey (2008, p.177) documented that government has undertaken a
number of reforms to widen access to education and raise its quality in the country. This
document highlighted the following steps of government taken for imparting quality education to
its mass:
15
The government has taken several substantial initiatives for teacher’s education and professional
development.
Textbooks
Textbooks shall be revised and updated to incorporate new knowledge.
16
Curriculum development and book development shall be coordinated.
Incentives shall be provided to teachers for producing new and attractive learning materials,
making use of audio, video and print media.
For each course, multiple textbooks may be approved and the institutions may be allowed to
select any one of these texts.
Use of library materials will be encouraged by teachers, through various types of academic
assignments.
Teachers
A separate unit for organizing teacher training shall be set up by each provincial education
department and at the federal level.
Mobile trainings units may be set up for on-the-job training of teachers.
Teacher training institutions will be equipped and strengthened, and their faculty will be
provided training to update their knowledge and skill.
A regular in-service training programme will be launched for teachers at all levels.
Deficiency of science, mathematics and languages teachers shall be removed.
Teacher training curricula will be updated and the need for increasing the duration of teacher
training will be assessed.
Physical Facilities
Science laboratories shall be provided in all middle schools.
Science kits will be developed with emphasis on new and modern experiments and shall be
provided to all middle schools.
Arrangements will be made for computer education at all levels through phased program
starting with secondary schools.
Evaluation
A system of continuous internal evaluation culminating in the annual examination will be used to
evaluate the performance of students.
Education is a factor of considerable importance in economic growth and does not need
any further elucidation. Globally, it has been observed that countries attach the highest priority to
17
education due to its complementarily with other sectors e.g., - Higher levels of education lead to
higher returns to the health agriculture and industrial sector. The investment in education sector
is vital for human resource development and quality of manpower. It is a universal accepted fact
that the education is considered most powerful instrument to gear up socio-economic
development and welfare of a society. This sector is highly associated with important variables
in other sector. Such as health, family planning, house hold and family structures and labor force.
The development in these sectors depends on how many man and women are literate and their
level of education attainment. The education brings about changes in the attitude and behavior of
the people towards modernization and quality of life, Particularly in the educated women. Govt.
of India accepts education as fundamental right for its citizen as well as its commitment to
provide access to education to every citizen. This challenge demands efficient use of available
resources.
A report of the National Education Assessment System (NEAS) of India (2008, p. 1-12)
stated that there is a significant deterioration in educational quality, confirming perceptions of
the people of India. For raising the standard of education, there is a dire need to bring
innovations in teaching practices, curriculum contents, evaluation system, infrastructure and
learning atmosphere in the institutions. The quality of teaching, guidance and counselling as well
as leadership skills are the most important factors in shaping the destiny of education and youth.
Unfortunately, the education system of India is lacking in many of these factors. According to
Ahmad et al. (2013a, p. 85-93) the system of education in India is ranked as the lowest in terms
of quality in South Asian countries. There are various causes, which lead to deterioration of
quality education at the secondary level. These include insufficient financial support, political
interference in appointments and transfers, lack of social recognition, non-availability of
accommodations, meager professional development opportunities, estranged relations among
staff, lack of parental participation in school affairs, unrealistic working conditions, lack of
physical and learning resources, weak supervision, and curriculum issues.
18
Rashid and Mukhtar (2012, p. 332-339) found that the main reasons for declining
standard of education include low allocation of funds for education, wide disparity of system
among different regions, medium of instruction, non-availability of committed and potential
candidates for teaching, inadequate pre- service and in-service training, dry curriculum, gap
between teachers and curriculum design, corruption, lack of accountability, teachers‟
absenteeism, obsolete teaching methods, rapid mushroom growth of private schools, and poor
examination system. The authors recommended that there is a dire need to focus upon teachers‟
professional development, revising curricula, developing quality textbooks revolutionizing
examination system, improving students‟ learning and making classroom environment
conducive to education.
Suleman et al. (2012, p. 324-328) viewed that there are various causes which affect the
quality of education negatively and lower the standard of education at the secondary level. These
causes include lack of physical facilities, unattractive salary packages, over-crowded classrooms,
poor financial status of teachers, inadequate teaching material, lack of required training and
refresher courses, autocratic environment of schools, non-availability of standard laboratories
and well-equipped libraries. The study also found that shortage of teaching staff, excess of
workload, teachers‟ part time engagements, posting in remote areas and different administrative
duties assigned to the teachers to collect data or to facilitate the administrative heads and
provocative and aggressive attitude of the students also deteriorate the quality of education at the
secondary level.
19
3
RESEARCH
METHODOLOGY
CHAPTER NO: 03
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
20
In this chapter the appropriate method must be selected for attaining the facts about the study of
causes of deteriorating standards of education in public school of city Indore. So the method of
descriptive research was selected for this study and data was collected through the questionnaire.
3.2 POPULATION
The study was conducted on the employees and teaching staff of public schools at Indore.
3.3 SAMPLE
Sample is one that is a representative of the population from which it was selected so 5 to 10
respondents/employees and teaching staff from public schools at city level were considered as a
sample for the study.
21
Through random sampling the researcher collected the data in which all the employees of
different public schools were provided an independent chance of being selected for the sample.
For the negative statements, the order of weight age was reversed. After awarding marks to each
opinion, total was computed. To reach certain conclusions, percentage, mean score, frequency
distribution, graphs and tables was computed by using modern software like MS Excel and
SPSS.
23
Percentages are calculated by using the following equation:
Amount × 100 = Percentage
Total
Mean scores are calculated for each statement, the following formula was used:
24
4
ANALYSIS
&
INTERPRETATION
CHAPTER NO: 04
ANALYSIS & INTERPRETATION OF THE DATA
25
This chapter deals with analysis and interpretation of the data collected for the study. The data
were analyzed in the followings ways:
Item Analysis
Analysis of Mean Scores of the Total Sample
STATEMENT NO: 01
26
The use of unfair means and mal-practices in examination has resulted in overall
deterioration of quality of education
Cumulative Mean
Options Frequency Percent Percent Score
SA 15 15.0 15.0
A 41 41.0 56.0
U 9 9.0 65.0
D 23 23.0 88.0 3.24
SD 12 12.0 100.0
Total 100 100.0
12% 15%
23%
SA
A
U
D
SD
41%
9%
Table & Graph No: 4.1-1 shows that 56% of the respondents were agreed to statement and 35%
of the respondents were not agreed. Only 9% of the respondents were undecided. Mean score
was 3.24 so level of acceptance was high.
STATEMENT NO: 02
27
Bad inspection system, in-adequate supervision and monitoring of schools by district level
officers are a big reason for poor quality.
Cumulative Mean
Options Frequency Percent Percent Score
SA 15 15.0 15.0
A 42 42.0 57.0
U 18 18.0 75.0
D 17 17.0 92.0 3.39
SD 8 8.0 100.0
Total 100 100.0
8% 15%
17%
SA
A
U
D
SD
18%
42%
Table & Graph No: 4.1-2 shows that 57% of the respondents were agree with statements while
25% of the respondents do not agree. And 18% were undecided. Mean score was 3.39 so level of
acceptance was high.
STATEMENT NO: 03
28
The existing system of examination at secondary level is questionable and does not
evaluate actual knowledge of students.
Cumulative Mean
Options Frequency Percent Percent Score
SA 19 19.0 19.0
A 54 54.0 73.0
U 12 12.0 85.0
D 10 10.0 95.0 3.72
SD 5 5.0 100.0
Total 100 100.0
10% 19%
5%
12%
SA
A
U
D
SD
54%
Table & Graph No: 4.1-3 shows that 73% of the respondents were agreed to statement while
15% of the respondents do not agree. And 12% were undecided. Mean score was 3.72 so level of
acceptance was high.
STATEMENT NO: 04
29
The present curriculum captivates student’s interest and prepares them for better career
and develops student’s creative thinking and analytical skills and revised on a regular basis.
Cumulative Mean
Options Frequency Percent Percent Score
SA 20 20.0 20.0
A 49 49.0 69.0
U 14 14.0 83.0
D 15 15.0 98.0 3.70
SD 2 2.0 100.0
Total 100 100.0
15% 2% 20%
14% SA
A
U
D
SD
49%
Table & Graph No: 4.1-4 shows that 69% of the respondents were agreed to statement while
17% of the respondents do not agree and 14% were undecided. Mean score was 3.70 so level of
acceptance was high.
STATEMENT NO: 05
Principal monitors the classes regularly to check the performance of students and
teachers.
30
TABLE NO: 4.1-5
Cumulative Mean
Options Frequency Percent Percent Score
SA 12 12.0 12.0
A 55 55.0 67.0
U 20 20.0 87.0
D 11 11.0 98.0 3.64
SD 2 2.0 100.0
Total 100 100.0
11% 2% 12%
20%
SA
A
U
D
SD
55%
Table & Graph No: 4.1-5 shows that 67% of the respondents were agreed to statement while
13% of the respondents were not agreed and 20% were undecided. Mean score was 3.64 so level
of acceptance was high.
STATEMENT NO: 06
31
Your school has mal administration and do not looks after all the important matters of
school which is the main cause of deteriorating educational standards in public schools.
Cumulative Mean
Options Frequency Percent Percent Score
SA 15 15.0 15.0
A 54 54.0 69.0
U 20 20.0 89.0
D 10 10.0 99.0 3.72
SD 1 1.0 100.0
Total 100 100.0
10% 1% 15%
20%
SA
A
U
D
SD
54%
Table & Graph No: 4.1-6 shows that 69% of the respondents were agree to the statement while
only 11% of the respondents do not agree and 20% were undecided. Mean score was 3.72 so
level of acceptance was high.
STATEMENT NO: 07
You are using the diagnostic evolutional method to know the problems of students.
32
TABLE NO: 4.1-7
Cumulative Mean
Options Frequency Percent Percent Score
SA 11 11.0 11.0
A 31 31.0 42.0
U 18 18.0 60.0
D 29 29.0 89.0 3.02
SD 11 11.0 100.0
Total 100 100.0
11% 11%
SA
29%
31% A
U
D
SD
18%
Table & Graph No: 4.1-7 shows that 42% of the respondents were agree to the statement while
40% of the respondents were not agree and 18% were undecided. Mean score was 3.02 so level
of acceptance was high.
STATEMENT NO: 08
Government does not provide sufficient funds to your school to meet student’s
requirements.
33
TABLE NO: 4.1-8
Cumulative Mean
Options Frequency Percent Percent Score
SA 15 15.0 15.0
A 37 37.0 52.0
U 18 18.0 70.0
D 22 22.0 92.0 3.29
SD 8 8.0 100.0
Total 100 100.0
8% 15%
22%
SA
A
U
D
SD
37%
18%
Table & Graph No: 4.1-8 shows that 52% of the respondents were agreed while 30% of the
respondents were not agreed and 18% were undecided. Mean score was 3.29 so level of
acceptance was high.
STATEMENT NO: 09
The quality of education has deteriorated due to unsatisfactory teaching learning process
and outmoded teaching methods are used by teachers.
34
TABLE NO: 4.1-9
Cumulative Mean
Options Frequency Percent Percent Score
SA 10 10.0 10.0
A 30 30.0 40.0
U 21 21.0 61.0
D 32 32.0 93.0 3.04
SD 7 7.0 100.0
Total 100 100.0
7% 10%
32%
30% SA
A
U
D
SD
21%
Table & Graph No: 4.1-9 shows that 40% of the respondents were agreed while 39% of the
respondents do not agreed. And 21% were undecided. Mean score was 3.04 so level of
acceptance was high.
STATEMENT NO: 10
The unavailability of scholarships to the needy and intelligent students destroys quality of
education.
TABLE NO: 4.1-10
35
Cumulative Mean
Options Frequency Percent Percent Score
SA 38 38.0 38.0
A 49 49.0 87.0
U 7 7.0 94.0
D 3 3.0 97.0 4.16
SD 3 3.0 100.0
Total 100 100.0
7% 3%
3%
38%
SA
A
U
D
SD
49%
Table & Graph No: 4.1-10 shows that 87% of the respondents were agreed while only 6% of the
respondents were not agreed. And only 7% of the employees were undecided. Mean score was
4.16 so level of acceptance was high.
STATEMENT NO: 11
.Excess of workload and different administrative duties assigned to the teachers to collect
data or to facilitate the administrative heads.
36
Cumulative Mean
Options Frequency Percent Percent Score
SA 30 30.0 30.0
A 51 51.0 81.0
U 7 7.0 88.0 3.99
D 12 12.0 100.0
Total 100 100.0
7% 12% 30%
SA
A
U
D
SD
51%
Table & Graph No: 4.1-11 shows that 81% of the respondents were agreed while 12% of the
respondents do not agreed and only 7% of the employees were undecided. Mean score was 3.99
so level of acceptance was high.
STATEMENT NO: 12
Your school teachers complete and revised the prescribed syllabus within given time of
an academic year.
37
TABLE NO: 4.1-12
Cumulative Mean
Options Frequency Percent Percent Score
SA 11 11.0 11.0
A 45 45.0 56.0
U 19 19.0 75.0
D 18 18.0 93.0 3.35
SD 7 7.0 100.0
Total 100 100.0
18% 7% 11%
SA
A
U
D
SD
19% 45%
Table & Graph No: 4.1-12 shows that 56% of the respondents were agreed while 25% of the
respondents were not agreed and 19% of the employees were undecided. Mean score was 3.35 so
level of acceptance was high.
To determine the level of acceptance the mean score was calculated for each statement and
recorded in the following form.
38
STATEMENT N SUM MEAN
39
Table No: 4.2 shows that all the 12 statements of questionnaire, the level of acceptance were
high i.e. mean score was more than 3.00. So, it indicated the agreement. There is no any
statement which has low level of acceptance i.e. mean score less than 3.00. Hence, the level of
acceptance of analysis of mean score of total sample was high.
40
5
FINDINGS,
CONCULSIONS
AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
CHAPTER NO: 05
In this chapter the summary of the findings was drawn from the questionnaire which was
analyzed in chapter four that would be presented. Thereafter, conclusions and recommendation
will be as to knowing the causes of deteriorating standards of education in public schools of
cityIndore.
41
5.1 FINDINGS
On the basis of data analysis the following results were drawn from it.
1. 56% of the respondents were agreed to statement that the use of unfair means and mal-
practices in examination has resulted in overall deterioration of quality of education and
35% of the respondents were not agreed. Only 9% of the respondents were undecided.
Mean score was 3.24 so level of acceptance was high.
2. 57% of the respondents were agreed with statements that bad inspection system, in-adequate
supervision and monitoring of schools by district level officers are a big reason for poor quality
while 25% of the respondents do not agree. And 18% were undecided. Mean score was
3.39 so level of acceptance was high.
3. 73% of the respondents were agreed to the statement that the existing system of examination
at secondary level is questionable and does not evaluate actual knowledge of students while only
15% of the respondents do not agree and 12% were undecided. Mean score was 3.72 so
level of acceptance was high.
4. 69% of the respondents were agreed to the statement that the present curriculum
captivates student’s interest and prepares them for better career and develops student’s
creative thinking and analytical skills while 17% of the respondents were not agree and
14% were undecided. Mean score was 3.70 so level of acceptance was high.
5. 67% of the respondents were agreed to the statement that Principal monitors the classes
regularly to check the performance of students and teachers and looks after all the
important matters regarding your academic achievements and discuss with your parents
while 13% of the respondents were not agreed and 20% were undecided. Mean score was
3.64 so level of acceptance was high.
6. 69% of the respondents were agreed to the statement that your school administration do not
looks after all the important matters of school because mal administration in public schools is the
42
main cause of deteriorating educational standards while only 11% of the respondents were
not agreed. And only 20% of the employees were undecided. Mean score was 3.72 so
level of acceptance was high.
7. 42% of the respondents were agreed to the statement that you are using the diagnostic
evolutional method to know the problems of students while 40% of the respondents do
not agreed and only 18% of the employees were undecided. Mean score was 3.02 so level
of acceptance was high.
8. 52% of the respondents were agreed to the statement that Government does not provide
sufficient funds to your school to meet student’s requirements while 30% of the respondents
were not agreed and 18% of the employees were undecided. Mean score was 3.29 so
level of acceptance was high.
9. 40% of the respondents were agreed to the statement that the quality of education has
deteriorated due to unsatisfactory teaching learning process and outmoded teaching methods are
used by teachers while 39% of the respondents were not agreed and only 21% were
undecided. Mean score was 3.04 so level of acceptance was high.
10. 87% of the respondents were agreed to the statement that the unavailability of
scholarships to the needy and intelligent students destroys quality of education while only
6% of the respondents were not agreed and 7% were undecided. Mean score was 4.16 so
level of acceptance was high.
11. 81% of the respondents were agreed to the statement that excess of workload, teacher’s part
time engagements, posting in remote areas and different administrative duties assigned to the
teachers to collect data or to facilitate the administrative heads deteriorate the quality of education
while 12% of the employees were not agreed and 7% were undecided. Mean score was
3.99 so level of acceptance was high.
43
12. 56% of the respondents were agreed to the statement that your school teachers complete
and revised the prescribed syllabus within given time of an academic year and use
teaching aids to make the lesson effective while 25% of the employees were not agreed
and 19% were undecided. Mean score was 3.35 so level of acceptance was high.
5.2 CONCLUSIONS
After analyzing the results it can be easily concluded that ineffective administration, non
flexible curriculum and outdated teaching methods used by teachers are the main reasons of
declining educational standards at secondary level. We may say that to some extent the imperfect
evaluation system and bad inspection involved in this deterioration. Improper health facilities,
political interference, lacking of co-curricular activities, non availability of scholarships are also
some of the factors which destroy standards of education. The results have shown that despite the
availability of properly trained and committed teachers the teaching-learning processes suffered
at the secondary level in the Indore. In most cases, teachers did not pay individual attention to
every student due to large class sizes; above all, most respondents were of the view that teachers
did not prepare or use lesson plans for ensuring implementation of the scheme of studies. The
findings have shown that teachers did not apply appropriate teaching methodologies for their
lessons. Students were not satisfied with the checking of their monthly tests and marking of their
answer books by their teachers. However, the respondents viewed that teachers observed
punctuality and had command over their subjects. A majority of the schools lacked physical
facilities and modern techniques of teaching were not incorporated in classrooms. However,
large number of high schools had library and laboratory facilities but students were not
encouraged to use them. Incentives in the form of scholarships and rewards were not available in
schools for the needy students and teachers. It was acknowledged that indiscipline adversely
affected quality of education. The respondents emphasized following merit in all matters of
school affairs and emphasized more opportunities for student involvement in co-curricular
activities. The respondents shared that mal-administration in the schools, lack of HR department and
lack of teachers‟ supervision and monitoring were the major causes of deterioration in education
quality. However, the respondents expected School Council and parents to play its due role in
promoting education quality. In conclusion, it appears eviden t that while a majority of the
respondents were of the view that material resources and physical infrastructure related factors
44
were not fully available to them, they strongly agreed that quality of education deteriorated due
to teaching, school environment and culture related factors.
5.3 RECOMMENDATIONS
In the technological era, development depends on education. Quality education is the
only source for survival in the globalization. If a country does not provide adequate access to
quality education, its survival in the 21st century will be very difficult. Quality is not a concrete
that can be presented to someone. Quality education depends upon teachers, learning materials
and basic facilities. Quality cannot be attained if one of these elements is missing.
A number of suggestions are offered and recommendations made for improving the
standards of education in the public schools of cityIndore. School Heads should control teachers‟
absenteeism, handle disciplinary issues and utilize instructional time to promote learning
outcomes of students. They should further ensure that teachers prepare lesson plans, follow
scheme of studies and use teaching strategies according to the needs of students. Classroom
lectures should be supported by student-centred activities such as presentations, group
discussions, simulations and role-playing. Teachers need to ensure that they use audio-visual aids
more frequently for teaching effectiveness. They should also prepare lesson plans on a daily
basis to ensure full implementation of the scheme of studies. The appointing authorities should
ensure to appoint adequately trained, qualified and committed teachers based on their aptitude
and intelligence tests so that meritorious teachers could promote quality education.
Overcrowded classrooms put students at risk of lower achievement rate and lead them to
disruptive behavior. In order to overcome these problems and maintain close contact between
teacher and the taught, the number of students in a class should not exceed 30 students. School
heads and secondary school teachers must be made accountable for poor performance and
unsatisfactory Board results. Quality infrastructural and physical facilities have great impact on
student learning. Therefore, the missing facilities like science laboratories, computer labs,
furniture, halls, auditoriums, toilets, clean drinking water, electricity and instructional aids
should be made available in schools by increasing budgetary allocations and mobilizing
community to support public sector education.
45
Talent Hunt program should be launched to provide scholarship to the needy and
intelligent students. This would facilitate the deprived but deserving students to continue
education. Incentives and rewards (such as medals, certificates of excellence, monetary benefits)
should be given to hard working teachers to motivate them towards work and retain their interest
in the teaching profession. Discipline should be maintained in secondary schools for providing
students conducive environment for learning. Teaching staff transfers, appointments and other
administrative decisions in schools should be made on merit for eliminating the element of
favoritism and nepotism. Co-curricular activities like debates, quiz, art and craft, science
exhibition, essay writing, music, in-door and out-door games should be planned and participation
of every student be ensured for overall development of their personalities. The role of the Parent-
Teacher Councils should be improved to ensure monitoring of the work and behaviour of
teachers and students and use all measures for improvement of quality of education. Un-
warranted political interference in recruitment, transfers and administrative affairs of schools
should be stopped so that an environment of professionalism prevails in educational
organizations. Special professional development programmes and refresher courses should be
arranged for Secondary School Teachers because, without transforming them, the quality of
education cannot be improved.
46
improve managerial skills of School Heads. Constant efforts are required to make curriculum
useful, effective and relevant to societal needs. The curriculum must be revised on a regular basis
to address ideological, social and economic needs of the country. The examination system at the
secondary school level must be made reliable so that it evaluates the actual knowledge of
students. In order to stop mal-practices and un-fair means in examination, there should be
complete ban on pocket books, guides and cheating material of all sorts. Questions given in
papers should be thought provoking and based from the entire course. In order to discourage
memorization and selective study, there should be ban on preparation of model papers and guess
papers.
REFERENCES
REFERENCES
Association for Teacher Education in Europe (2006). Policy Paper: The Quality of Teachers.
ATEE
47
Beaton, J. (1999). Performance indicators and quality management in the university: A critical
review. Ottawa: Canadian Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences.
Dill, D. D. (2003). The ‘Catch 22’ of academic quality: Implications for universities and public
policy. Background paper: Retrieved December 10, 2010 from
http://www.unc.edu/ppaq/docs/Montreal2.pdf
Gandhe, S.K (n.d). Quality Assurance in Open and Distance Learning in India. Retrieved on July
29, 2010. Available at http://www.openpraxis.com/files/Gandhe%20et%20al..pdf
Washington: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
Pounder, J. (1999). Institutional performance in higher education: Is quality a relevant concept?
Quality Assurance in Education, 7(1/3), 156-163.
Robinson, B. (1993). “Quality, Relevance and Effectiveness in Distance Education, Unit 11.” In
Course 2, The Development of Distance Education, MA/Diploma in Distance Education.
Cambridge: IEC/ University of London.
Sadker, M.P & Sadker, D.M (2000). Teachers, Schools, Society. New York: Quebecor Printing
Book Group.
Xhaferri, R & Iqbal, K (2010, December 19). Unlocking the Doors to Opportunity. Dawn.
View publication
Abaalkhail, M., and Irani, Z. (2012). A study of Influential factors on Quality of Education.
International Journal of Humanities and Applied Sciences, 1(3), 94-97.
Ahmad, I., Rehman, S., Ali, S., Iqbal, S., Ali, F. and Badshah, R. (2013a). Problems of
Government Secondary School System in Pakistan: Critical Analysis of Literature and Finding a
Way Forward. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences,
3(2), 85-96.
Chapman, D., and Adams, D. (2002). The Quality of Education: Dimensions and Strategies.
Asian Development Bank Comparative Education Research Centre. Hong Kong: The University
of Hong Kong.
Chohan, M.Y. (2010). Education for All the Year 2000-Assessment Pakistan Country Report.
Dakar Framework for Action (2000). Dakar Framework for Action for Action Education for All:
Meeting our Collective Commitments Adopted by the World Education Forum Dakar, Senegal:
UNESCO.
48
Gbenu, J.P. (2012). State of Nigerian Secondary Education and the Need for Quality Sustenance
Educational Management Department, Ojo, Nigeria: Faculty of Education, Lagos State
University.
Garvin, D. (2014). Eight Dimensions of Quality. Wikipedia the Free Encyclopedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education.
Mishra, S. (2007). Quality Assurance in Higher Education: an introduction, Bangalore, India:
National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC).
Natarajan (1993) (as cited in N. Cube, N, J. 2004). Managing the Quality of Education in
Zimbabwe: The international Efficiency of Rural Day Secondary Schools. Unpublished PhD
Thesis, University of South Africa, Zimbabwe.
Ncube, N.J. (2004). Managing the Quality of Education in Zimbabwe: The international
Efficiency of Rural Day Secondary Schools. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of South
Africa, Zimbabwe.
Parveen, I., Iqbal, M., and Shah, J. (2012). Developing a Strategy for School Improvement.
International Journal of Asian Social Science, 2(2), 81-87.
Saleem, F. (2012). Determinants of School Effectiveness: A study at Punjab level. International
Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(14), 242-251.
Sallis, E. (2002). Total Quality Management in Education (Third Edition), London, UK: Kogan
Page.
UNESCO (2000). Dakar Framework for Action Education for All: Meeting our Collective
Commitments Adopted by the World Education Forum Dakar, UNESCO. Senegal.
QUESTIONNAIRE
Respected Participant,
49
I ensure that your provided information must be used only for academic purpose and kept in
confidential.
Thank you very much for your time and cooperation with me, so that I would be able to complete
my academic research.
Requestor,
Rashmi Sengar
B.Ed (2018-2020)
Christian Eminent College, Indore
School Name:___________________________
Designation:____________________________
Gender:________________________________
Age:___________________________________
Marital Status:___________________________
Qualifications:___________________________
Part B: Questions
Instruction
Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the given statements. Reade
carefully and place a mark of tick () in the relevant box of your answer for each statement.
1. S.D = Strongly Disagreed
2. D = Disagreed
3. U = Undecided
4. A = Agreed 5. S.A = Strongly Agreed
50
5. Principal monitors the classes regularly to check the performance of
students and teachers.
6. Your school has mal administration and do not looks after all the important
matters of school.
7. You are using the diagnostic evolutional method to know the problems of
students.
8. Government does not provide sufficient funds to your school to meet
student’s requirements.
9. Unsatisfactory teaching learning process and outmoded teaching methods
are used by teachers.
10. The unavailability of scholarships to the needy and intelligent students.
11. Excess of workload and different administrative duties assigned to the teachers to
collect data or to facilitate the administrative heads.
12. Your school teachers complete and revised the prescribed syllabus within
given time of an academic year.
51