Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Module 4
Module 4
Module 4
Module :
4
External field induced membrane separation
processes for colloidal particles:
Dr. Sirshendu De
Professor, Department of Chemical Engineering
Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur
e-mail: sde@che.iitkgp.ernet.in
Keywords:
Separation processes, membranes, electric field assisted separation, liquid
membrane, cloud point extraction, electrophoretic separation, supercritical fluid
extraction
Electrokinetic Effects:
When one charged phase is caused to have a relative velocity past the second phase, a
effects”.
If a charge phase (I) is placed next to another phase (II), in phase II, there is an excess
Phase I
Phase II
close to interface and their concentration reduces away from the surface to the bulk.
Electrostatic potential is taken as zero in the bulk. The bulk is situated far from the
charged surface, i.e., 5-200 nm from the surface depending on electrolytic concentration.
There are four distinct effects depending on the way in which motion is induced:
1. Electrophoresis
2. Electro-osmosis
3. Streaming potential
4. Sedimentation potential
Electrophoresis:
If one phase is liquid (or gas) in which the second phase is suspended as particles as
solids (or liquid), then the particles can be induced to move by applying an external
about their net electric charge or their surface potential with respect to bulk of the
suspending phase.
Electroosmosis:
When solid remains stationary and the liquid move in response to an applied electric
field, the phenomenon is known as Electroosmosis. It occurs when solid is in the form of
a capillary or porous plug which is filled with liquid. Applied field acts upon the charges
(usually ions) in the liquid as they move in response to the field they drag the liquid along
with them.
Measurement of velocity of liquid or volume transported per unit current flow, gives
information about the net surface charge or the electrical potential in the neighbourhood
of the wall.
Streaming potential:
capillary/porous plug, one can force the liquid to move under a pressure gradient. Excess
charges near the wall are carried away by the liquid and there is an accumulation in the
downstream causing the build up of an electric field which drives an electric current back
(by ionic contraction through the liquid) against the flow direction. A steady state is
reached and the measured potential difference across the capillary/plug is called
the wall.
Sedimentation potential:
When charged colloidal particles are allowed to settle (or rise) through a fluid under
In electrophoresis, particles (sphere, cylinder, etc.) move in the liquid. Surface of shear is
an imaginary surface which is considered to lie close to the solid charged surface and
within which fluid is stationary or having infinite viscosity. This thin layer of fluid is
known as Stern layer. So, when particles move, they take an envelope of fluids with
counter charges with it. The potential on this outer surface is known as Zeta potential.
Many colloidal systems are determined by particle charge (or potential). Potential
etc.
charged surface
Concentration profile of
x=
concentration will be more towards the surface and decrease towards bulk of the solution.
Where, z+ is the valency of cations; z- is the valency of anions; n0+ and n0- are the number
φ ( x ) = zeψ ( x) (4.3)
Where, Ψ(x) is the potential of ion at x. At the steady state, net ionic flux at any cross
section is zero. The ionic flux J contains two components, namely, (i) flux due to
⎡ dn n dφ ⎤
J = − ⎢D + ⎥ (4.4)
⎣ dx f dx ⎦
Where, f is friction factor that is a function of geometry, size of solute, etc. At steady
state,
dn dφ
− = (4.5)
n fD
K BT
Where, f = from Stokes-Einstein equation.
D
KB=Boltzman constant.
B
n( x ) φ ( x)
dn 1
∫
n0
=
n K BT ∫0
dφ
⎛ φ ( x) ⎞
n ( x ) = n0 exp ⎜ − ⎟ (4.6)
⎝ K BT ⎠
Charge density
⎛ z eψ ⎞
ni = ni 0 exp ⎜ − i ⎟ (4.7)
⎝ K BT ⎠
Where, ψ=ψ(x). For counter ions, zi is negative and for the co-ions it is positive in case of
positively charged surface. Thus, the concentration distribution of counter and co ions
become,
⎛ z eψ ⎞
ni |counter ion = ni 0 exp ⎜ i ⎟ (4.8)
⎝ K BT ⎠
⎛ z eψ ⎞
ni |co −ion = ni 0 exp ⎜ − i ⎟ (4.9)
⎝ K BT ⎠
For a symmetric electrolyte, like NaCl, | z+ |=| z− |= z and for positively charged surface,
⎛ zeψ ⎞
n+ = n+0 exp ⎜ − ⎟ (4.10)
⎝ K BT ⎠
⎛ zeψ ⎞
n− = n−0 exp ⎜ + ⎟ (4.11)
⎝ K BT ⎠
ρ = ∑ zi eni (4.12)
⎛ zi eψ ( x ) ⎞
ρ = ∑ zi eni 0 exp ⎜ − ⎟ (4.13)
⎝ K BT ⎠
Potential distribution
If the charged surface is a flat plate and has an electrostatic potential ψ0, the
compensation ions are regarded as point charges. The potential distribution is given by
Poisson’s equation.
Where, ρ is the charge density; ψ is the potential, ∈ is the dielectric constant of the
medium.
∈=∈0 D (4.15)
∈0 is Permittivity in vacuum and D is the dielectric constant and it is about 80 for water.
ρ
∇ 2ψ = − (4.16)
∈
In planar coordinate, and inserting the expression of charge density from Eq.(4.13), the
d 2ψ ρ ⎛ z eψ ⎞
= − ∑ zi ni 0 exp ⎜ − i ⎟ (4.17)
dx 2
∈ i ⎝ K BT ⎠
layer (i.e. zeψ/KBT << 1), the above equation is simplified to,
B
d 2ψ 1⎡ nψ⎤
= − ⎢ ∑ zi eni 0 − ∑ zi2 e 2 i 0 ⎥ (4.18)
dx 2
∈⎣ K BT ⎦
From the electro neutrality condition the first term in Eq.(4.18) becomes zero and the
d 2ψ 1
dx 2
=
∈ K BT
∑z e n ψ
2 2
i i0 (4.19)
d 2ψ
= κ 2ψ (4.20)
dx 2
e 2 ∑ zi2 ni 0
= ( Debye length )
−1
Where, κ =
∈ Κ BT
ψ = ψ 0 e −κ x (4.23)
Where, κ is the compression of double layer and 1/ κ is the double layer thickness.
Large value of κ indicates compact of double layer and smaller κ denotes diffused double
layer.
d 2ψ 1 ⎛ z eψ ⎞
= − ∑ zi ni 0 ∈ exp ⎜ − i ⎟ (4.24)
dx 2
∈ i ⎝ K BT ⎠
Multiply both sides by 2dψ/dx and integrating the following equation is resulted
ψ
x
dψ dψ 1 ⎛ z eψ ⎞
∫∞ 2 dx dx dx = − ∈ψ∫=0 ∑i zi ni 0 ∈ exp ⎜⎝ − Ki BT ⎟ dψ
⎠
(4.25)
2 ψ
⎛ dψ ⎞ 2 ⎛ zi eψ ⎞
⎜ ⎟
⎝ dx ⎠
= −
∈
∑ n z
i0 i ∈ ∫0 ⎜⎝ − K BT
exp ⎟ dψ
⎠
2 K BT ⎡ ⎛ zi eψ ⎞ ⎤
=
∈
∑n i0 ⎢exp ⎜ − ⎟ − 1⎥ (4.26)
⎣ ⎝ K BT ⎠ ⎦
For symmetric electrolyte, z+ = -z- and |z+| = |-z-| = z, the above equation is,
2 K BTn0 ⎡ ⎞ ⎤
2
⎛ dψ ⎞ ⎛ zeψ ⎞ ⎛ zeψ
⎜ ⎟ = ⎢exp ⎜ ⎟ + exp ⎜ − ⎟ − 2⎥ (4.27)
⎝ dx ⎠ ∈ ⎣ ⎝ K BT ⎠ ⎝ K BT ⎠ ⎦
dψ 2κ K BT ⎛ zeψ ⎞
=− sinh ⎜ ⎟ (4.28)
dx ze ⎝ 2 K BT ⎠
⎛ zψ ⎞ ⎛ zψ 0 ⎞
tanh ⎜ ⎟ = tanh ⎜ ⎟ exp ( −κ x ) (4.29)
⎝ 4 ⎠ ⎝ 4 ⎠
eψ
Where, ψ =
K BT
ψ = ψ 0 exp ( −κ x ) (4.30)
electrolytic solution, for example, filtration of a protein solution. Every protein is charged
and we can manipulate their charge by setting the operating pH. If the operating pH is set
above the characteristic isoelectric point (pH at which protein is charge less), protein is
negatively charged and if it is set below the isoelectric point, it is positively charged.
⎛ dψ ⎞
d ⎜ r2
1 ⎝ dx ⎟⎠
2
= κ 2ψ (4.31)
r dr
Using the substitution, ψ= u/r, the solution of the above equation becomes,
A κ r B −κ r
ψ= e + e (4.32)
r r
Using the boundary conditions, ψ→0, as r→∞ and ψ= ψ0 at r=a, the final solution of
potential becomes,
⎛a⎞
ψ = ψ 0 ⎜ ⎟ exp ⎡⎣ −κ ( r − a ) ⎤⎦ (4.33)
r
⎝ ⎠
Charge on the particles must be balanced by that in double layer and can be estimated by
a charge balance,
∞
Q=− ∫ 4π r ρ dr
2
(4.34)
r =a
Substituting the expression of charge density from Eq.(4.13), the above equation
becomes,
∞
⎛ z eψ ⎞
Q=− ∫ 4π r
2
dr ∑ ni 0 zi e exp ⎜ − i ⎟ (4.35)
r =a ⎝ K BT ⎠
∞
⎛ z eψ ⎞
Q=− ∫ 4π r
2
dr ∑ ni 0 zi e ⎜1 − i ⎟
r =a ⎝ K BT ⎠
∞
zi e 2 ni 0
= ∫ ∈ 4π r dr ∑ 2
ψ
r =a
∈ K BT
∞
= 4πκ 2 ∈ ∫ r 2ψ dr
a
∞
= 4πκ ∈ ∫ψ 0 a exp ( −κ [ r − a ]) rdr
2
= 4π ∈ a (1 + κ a )ψ 0 (4.36)
Thus, the surface potential of the charged sphere can be expressed by its surface charge
as,
Q
ψ0 = (4.37)
4π ∈ a (1 + κ a )
If we consider ‘a’ as radius out to the shear plane, ψ 0 =∈ the surface potential becomes
zeta potential as that is the potential exposed to the electrolytic solution. Hence, the zeta
Qe
ξ= (4.38)
4π ∈ a (1 + κ a )
Electrophoresis:
The electrostatic force applied on the charged particle in presence of external electric
Fe = qE (4.39)
The viscous force under Stokes regime, felt by the particle is presented as,
qE
v= (4.41)
6πμ R
v q
u= = (4.42)
E 6πμ R
2 ∈ξ
u= (4.43)
3 μ
This is a case of compact double layer. Hence, the curvature of the sphere can really be
neglected and we consider the electrolytic solution including the charged sphere as a
continuum (as shown in Fig. 4.3) and one can fix the coordinate system on a flat plane.
Thus, the x-component equation of motion becomes under Stokes flow regime
d 2v
μ = ρ E (No Pressure gradient/inertial term → small) (4.44)
dx 2
Invoking the Poisson’s equation (Eq. **), and replacing the charge density in Eq. (44),
d 2v d 2ψ
μ 2 = −∈ E 2 (4.45)
dx dx
mobility,
μ v =∈ Eξ
v ∈ξ
u= = (4.46)
E μ
solution under an external electric field, one can enhance the performance of the
macrosolutes, like proteins, micelles, colloids like silica, etc. During ultrafiltration, these
charged solutes deposit over the membrane surface, forming a gel type of layer (in case
of gel controlling filtration) or a concentrated layer of solutes (in case of osmotic pressure
controlled filtration). With the application of an external electric field with suitable
polarity, the deposited charged particles migrate from the membrane surface and thus
reducing the concentration polarization and enhancing the throughput of the process.
surfactant micelles, etc. The governing equation of such system is given as,
dc
(vw − ve )c + =0 (4.47)
dy
The above equation can be solved with the boundary conditions that at y=0, c=cg and
⎛ cg ⎞
vw = k ln ⎜ ⎟ + ve (4.48)
⎝ c0 ⎠
Where, ve is the electrophoretic mobility and should be calculated from either Eq.(4.41)
or Eq.(4.46), depending on the zeta potential on the macroion. Eq.(4.48) clearly shows an
∂c ∂c ∂ 2c
u − (vw − ve ) = D 2 (4.49)
∂x ∂y ∂ y
The boundary conditions of Eqs.(4.49) remain same as shown in earlier chapter but the
∂c
At y=0, (vw − ve )c + D =0 (4.50)
∂y
These set of equations have to be solved with the osmotic pressure relationship (Eq.3.36)
Solved Problems
e 2 ∑ zi2 ni 0
κ = 2
∈ K BT
= 1000MiNA
12
C V-1m-1.
M i zi2
κ 2 = e21000 N A ∑
∈ K BT
M +M
= 1000 N Ae 2
∈ K BT
= 2000 N A Me 2 / ∈ K BT
= 1.05*1015
κ −1 = 30.8 A 0
AB2 U A2+ + 2 B −
∑z M 2
i i = 4M + M + M = 6M
2. A protein solution in 0.15(M) NaCl is ultrafiltered with mass transfer coefficient 2 x 10-5
m/s. Filtration is gel layer controlled. Feed concentration is 10 kg/m3 and gel
concentration is 300 kg/m3. The charge number on protein is 10e and it has a radius 5 nm.
(b) If an external electric field of 400 v/m is applied, what is the permeate flux?
2000 N A Me 2
κ2 =
ε K BT
M = 0.15 ( M )
κ =
2
κ −1 = 7.96 × 10−10 m
vE = electrophotic velocity
εξ
= E
μ
Qe
ξ=
4πε a (1 + κ a )
1.6 × 10−19
ξ=
4 × π × 80 × 8.85 × 10−12 × 5 × 10−9 × 7.28
= 4.94 mV
= 1.4 ×10−6 m / s
Cg 300 −5 −5 m
3
(a) Permeate flux = K ln = 2 ×10 × ln = 6.8 × 10
C0 10 m 2 .s
(b) Permeate flux in presence of electric field = 6.8 ×10−5 + 1.4 × 10−6
m3 −5
= 6.94 × 10
m 2 .s
3. A protein solution in 0.05(M) NaCl is ultrafiltered with mass transfer coefficient 5 x 10-5
m/s. Filtration is gel layer controlled. Feed concentration is 10 kg/m3 and gel
concentration is 400 kg/m3. The charge number on protein is 10e and it has a radius 5 nm.
(b) If an external electric field of 300 v/m is applied, what is the permeate flux?
2000 N A Me 2
κ =
2
ε K BT
κ2 =
80 × 8.85 × 10−12 × 1.38 ×10−23 × 300
κ = 7.25 ×108 m −1
Cg
(a) Permeate flux = K ln
C0
400
= 5 × 10−5 × ln
10
m3
= 18.44 × 10−5
m 2 .s
(b) E = 300 V / m
Qe
ξ=
4πε a (1 + κ a )
1.6 × 10−19
=
4 × π × 80 × 8.85 × 10−12 × 5 × 10−9 × (1 + 7.25 × 108 × 5 × 10−9 )
= 7.78 mV
= 1.65 × 10−6 m / s
m3
= 1.86 ×10−4
m 2 .s
4. A positively charged spherical particle of mass m is placed at the bottom of a tall vertical
tank filled up completely by 10-4 (M) NaCl solution. Particle radius is 100 A0 and density
ρ p , 2000 kg/m3. Take solution density ( ρ w ) as 1000 kg/m3. The zeta potential of the
particle is measured and is found out to be ξ mV. A suitable electric filed is applied
between the top and the bottom of the vessel so that the particle is attracted and moves
up.
(i) Find the minimum field strength (in V/m) so that the particle is lifted up.
(ii) Now, a filed strength, of the magnitude twice the minimum values (E=2Emin) is
applied. Obtain an expression of the velocity variation of the particle with time.
(iii) In (ii), will the particle attain a terminal velocity? If so, what is vt (terminal
velocity)?
Solution:
Qe = ξ × 4πε a (1 + κ a )
∑F y =0
FB + Fe − mg = 0
Fe = mg − FB
⎛ m ⎞
FB = Buyontforce = ⎜
⎜ ρp ⎟⎟ ρ w g
⎝ ⎠
m
Fe = mg − ρw g
ρp
⎛ ρ ⎞
Qe Emin = mg ⎜1 − w ⎟
⎜ ρ ⎟
⎝ p ⎠
mg ⎛ ρ w ⎞ mg ⎛ ρw ⎞
Emin = ⎜⎜1 − ⎟⎟ = ⎜1 − ⎟
Qe ⎝ ρ p ⎠ ξ × 4πε a (1 + κ a ) ⎝⎜ ρ p ⎠⎟
(ii) E = 2 Emin
dv
m = FB + Fe − mg − friction
dt
mρ w
FB = g
ρp
Fe = Qe E
friction = 6πμ av
dv mρ w
m = g − mg + Qe E − 6πμ av
dt ρp
dv ⎛ ρ w ⎞
=⎜ − 1⎟ g + Qe E − 6πμ av
dt ⎜⎝ ρ p ⎟⎠
dv ⎛ ρ ⎞
= Qe E − ⎜1 − w ⎟ g − 6πμ av
dt ⎜ ρp ⎟
⎝ ⎠
dv
= dt
⎛ ρ ⎞
Qe E − ⎜ 1 − w ⎟ g − 6πμ av
⎜ ρ ⎟
⎝ p ⎠
⎛ ρ ⎞
Let, Qe E − ⎜1 − w ⎟ g − 6πμ av = z
⎜ ρp ⎟
⎝ ⎠
dz
dv = −
6πμ a
dz
⇒ − = dt
6πμ az
dz
= −6πμ a dt
z
z = c1 exp ( −6πμ at )
⎛ ρ ⎞
Qe E − ⎜1 − w ⎟ g − 6πμ av = c1 exp ( −6πμ at )
⎜ ρp ⎟
⎝ ⎠
⎛ ρ ⎞
At t=0, v=0 ⇒ c1 = Qe E − ⎜ 1 − w ⎟ g
⎜ ρp ⎟
⎝ ⎠
⎛ ρ ⎞ ⎡ ⎛ ρ ⎞ ⎤
Qe E − ⎜1 − w ⎟ g − 6πμ av = ⎢Qe E − ⎜ 1 − w ⎟ g ⎥ exp ( −6πμ at )
⎜ ρ ⎟ ⎜ ρ ⎟ ⎥
⎝ p ⎠ ⎣⎢ ⎝ p ⎠ ⎦
⎡ ⎛ ρ ⎞ ⎤
6πμ av = ⎢Qe E − ⎜1 − w ⎟ g ⎥ ⎡⎣1 − exp ( −6πμ at ) ⎤⎦
⎜ ρ ⎟ ⎥
⎣⎢ ⎝ p ⎠ ⎦
⎛ ρ ⎞
Qe E − ⎜1 − w ⎟ g
⎜ ρ ⎟
v (t ) = ⎝ p ⎠
⎡⎣1 − exp ( −6πμ at ) ⎤⎦
6πμ a
dv
v = vt and =0
dt
⎛ρ ⎞
6πμ avt = ⎜ w − 1⎟ g + Qe E
⎜ ρp ⎟
⎝ ⎠
1 ⎡ ⎛ ρ ⎞ ⎤
vt = ⎢Qe E − ⎜⎜1 − w ⎟⎟ g ⎥
6πμ a ⎢⎣ ⎝ ρ p ⎠ ⎥⎦
5. Solution of protein A with 0.15 (M) NaCl and 300C is ultrafiltered in a rectangular
channel of equivalent diameter 2mm, length 50 cm, cross flow velocity 0.3 m/s and
diffusivity 6x10-11 m2/s. Filtration is gel layer controlled. Feed concentration is 10 kg/m3
and gel concentration is 300 kg/m3. Protein A has surface charge Q=20e (e is the
(ii) Now a suitable external electric field of strength 400 volt/m is applied to increase
the permeate flux. What will be the steady state flux now? Assume protein
protein concentration.
(iii) A protein B of surface charge 30e, radius 500A and diffusivity 8x10-11 m2/s is
filtered in the same filtration cell. It also forms a gel with gel concentration 250
kg/m3 at the same feed concentration. What strength of the electrolyte NaCl needs
to be added in order to get the same flux value of A as in part (ii) under the same
Solution:
Qe a = 20 nm = 2 × 10−9 m
ξ=
4πε a (1 + κ a ) Qe = 20e
20 ×1.6 × 10−19
=
⎛ 2 ×10−9 ⎞
4 × π × 80 × 8.85 × 10−12 × 2 ×10−9 × ⎜1 + −10 ⎟
⎝ 7.96 ×10 ⎠
= 0.051 Volt
vE = electrophotic velocity
εξ
= E
μ
= 1.44 ×10−5 m / s
1/ 3
Kd e ⎛ d ⎞
Sh = = 1.85 ⎜ Re Sc e ⎟
D ⎝ L⎠
1/3
kd e ⎛u d υ d ⎞
= 1.85 ⎜ 0 e . . e ⎟
D ⎝ υ D L⎠
1/3
⎛ u D2 ⎞
k = 1.85 ⎜ 0 ⎟
⎝ de L ⎠
1/ 3
⎛ 0.3 × 36 × 10−22 ⎞
= 1.85 ⎜ −3 ⎟
⎝ 2 × 10 × 0.5 ⎠
k = 1.9 ×10−6 m / s
Cg
Permeate flux = k ln
C0
300
= 1.9 ×10−6 ln
10
m3
= 6.46 ×10−6
m 2 .s
m3
= 2.09 × 10−5
m 2 .s
(iii) Protein B:
1/3
⎛ 0.3 × 64 × 10−22 ⎞
k = 1.85 ⎜ −3 ⎟ = 2.3 ×10−6 m / s
⎝ 2 ×10 × 0.5 ⎠
⎛ 250 ⎞ εξ
2.09 ×10−5 = 2.3 × 10−6 ln ⎜ ⎟+ E
⎝ 10 ⎠ μ
80 × 8.85 ×10−12 ξ
2.09 × 10−5 = 7.4 × 10−6 + E
10−3
1.35 × 10−5
E=
7.08 ×10−7 ξ
Qe
ξ=
4πε a (1 + κ a )
30 ×1.6 ×10−19
=
⎛ 5 ×10−9 ⎞
4 × π × 80 × 8.85 ×10 −12
× 50 × 10 −10
× ⎜1 + −10 ⎟
⎝ 7.96 ×10 ⎠
0.11
= = 0.015
1 + 6.28
1.35 ×10−5 V
E= −7
= 1271
7.08 × 10 × 0.015 m
References
1. B. Sarkar and S. De, Electric field enhanced gel controlled cross-flow ultrafiltration
under turbulent flow conditions, Separation and Purification Technology, 74 (2010) 73-82.
3. B. Sarkar, S. DasGupta and S. De, “Flux decline during electric field assisted cross
flow ultrafiltration of mosambi (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck) juice” Journal of Membrane
4. B. Sarkar, S. DasGupta and S. De, “Application of external electric field to enhance the
synthetic and fruit juice”, Separation and Purification Technology, 63 (2008) 582-59.
8. B. Sarkar, S. DasGupta and S. De, “Prediction of permeate flux during osmotic pressure
controlled electric field enhanced cross flow ultrafiltration”, Journal of Colloid and
controlled ultrafiltration of synthetic and fruit juice”, Journal of Membrane Science, 307