JUDGING CRITERIA FOR SPEECHES

“PEKAN OLAHRAGA DAN PRESTASI PPPJ LXXVIII2021”

FULL NAME : PUTU DELIA AYUSYARA DIVAYANI

CLASS : VIII
THEME : SINGLE PROSECUTION SYSTEM

MAXIMUM
POINTS
No CRITERIA POINT
AWARDED
SCORE
1 2 3 4
Speech Development
1 Structure, Organization, Support Material 25 20
Effectiveness
Achievemet of Purpose, Interest, Reception
2 20 12
Physical
3 Appearance, Body Language, Speaking Area 15 10
Voice
4 Flexibility, Volume 10 10
Correctness
5 Grammar, Pronunciation, Word Selection 30 20

Total Score 100 72

Judge’s comments (required):

The content of the speech is quite good, contains evidence and opinions. but
unfortunately the opinions that are published sometimes use repeated and inaccurate
sentence structures resulting in unclear meanings
*Judges may disqualify participants for gross misconduct and ineligibity
**All judges decisions and results are considered as final.

Jakarta, October 2021.

Judge

(…………………………….)
 JUDGING CRITERIA FOR SPEECHES
“PEKAN OLAHRAGA DAN PRESTASI PPPJ LXXVIII2021”

FULL NAME : MEYSSA RATNA JUWITA

CLASS : IV
THEME : SINGLE PROSECCUTION SYSTEM

MAXIMUM
POINTS
No CRITERIA POINT
AWARDED
SCORE
1 2 3 4
Speech Development
1 Structure, Organization, Support Material 25 20
Effectiveness
Achievemet of Purpose, Interest, Reception
2 20 15
Physical
3 Appearance, Body Language, Speaking Area 15 15
Voice
4 Flexibility, Volume 10 10
Correctness
5 Grammar, Pronunciation, Word Selection 30 25

Total Score 100 85

Judge’s comments (required): the content of the speech is quite good, word selection,
sentence structure and includes comparative literature. However, the opinions
presented by the speakers are not convincing because the common thread in each
discussion is not clear and the points and objectives conveyed are a bit floating
*Judges may disqualify participants for gross misconduct and ineligibity
**All judges decisions and results are considered as final.

Jakarta, October 2021.

Judge

(…………………………….)
 JUDGING CRITERIA FOR SPEECHES
“PEKAN OLAHRAGA DAN PRESTASI PPPJ LXXVIII2021”

FULL NAME : AISHA RAYYAN

CLASS : IX
THEME : RESTORATIVE JURSICE

MAXIMUM
POINTS
No CRITERIA POINT
AWARDED
SCORE
1 2 3 4
Speech Development
1 Structure, Organization, Support Material 25 23

Effectiveness
Achievemet of Purpose, Interest, Reception
2 20 15
Physical
3 Appearance, Body Language, Speaking Area 15 15
Voice
4 Flexibility, Volume 10 10
Correctness
5 Grammar, Pronunciation, Word Selection 30 20

Total Score 100 83

Judge’s comments (required): The choice of words is quite persuasive, the structure of
the speech is very good, and the inclusion of case examples is quite good. However, it
seems that there are a lot of human errors such as typos and also the lack of
laws/comparison articles that are used so that they do not support the opinions
expressed
*Judges may disqualify participants for gross misconduct and ineligibity
**All judges decisions and results are considered as final.

Jakarta, October 2021.

Judge

(…………………………….)
 JUDGING CRITERIA FOR SPEECHES
“PEKAN OLAHRAGA DAN PRESTASI PPPJ LXXVIII2021”

FULL NAME : ROTUA NAULI BR PANJAITAN

CLASS : II
THEME : RESTORATIVE JUSTICE

MAXIMUM
POINTS
No CRITERIA POINT
AWARDED
SCORE
1 2 3 4
Speech Development
1 Structure, Organization, Support Material 25 20

Effectiveness
Achievemet of Purpose, Interest, Reception
2 20 12
Physical
3 Appearance, Body Language, Speaking Area 15 13
Voice
4 Flexibility, Volume 10 10
Correctness
5 Grammar, Pronunciation, Word Selection 30 20

Total Score 100 80

Judge’s comments (required): The choice of words is quite persuasive, the structure of
the speech is very good, and the inclusion of case examples is quite good. However, it
seems that there are a lot of human errors such as typos and also the lack of
laws/comparison articles that are used so that they do not support the opinions
expressed
*Judges may disqualify participants for gross misconduct and ineligibity
**All judges decisions and results are considered as final.

Jakarta, October 2021.

Judge

(…………………………….)
 JUDGING CRITERIA FOR SPEECHES
“PEKAN OLAHRAGA DAN PRESTASI PPPJ LXXVIII2021”

FULL NAME : M. ADENAN

CLASS : VI
THEME : KEJAKSAAN DALAM BINGKAI TRIAS POLITIKA

MAXIMUM
POINTS
No CRITERIA POINT
AWARDED
SCORE
1 2 3 4
Speech Development
1 Structure, Organization, Support Material 25 18

Effectiveness
Achievemet of Purpose, Interest, Reception
2 20 10
Physical
3 Appearance, Body Language, Speaking Area 15 10
Voice
4 Flexibility, Volume 10 8
Correctness
5 Grammar, Pronunciation, Word Selection 30 15

Total Score 100 61

Judge’s comments (required): The content of the speech text is not very convincing. it
can be seen that the participants were unprepared in sending texts due to the absence
of an opening sentence, the lack of articles/comparative literature used, opinions that
were still floating and the absence of a final statement. there are similarities in the text
with other participants
*Judges may disqualify participants for gross misconduct and ineligibity
**All judges decisions and results are considered as final.

Jakarta, October 2021.

Judge

(…………………………….)
 JUDGING CRITERIA FOR SPEECHES
“PEKAN OLAHRAGA DAN PRESTASI PPPJ LXXVIII2021”

FULL NAME : ADE TAGOR MAULI

CLASS :V
THEME : RESTORATIVE JUSTICE

MAXIMUM
POINTS
No CRITERIA POINT
AWARDED
SCORE
1 2 3 4
Speech Development
1 Structure, Organization, Support Material 25 20

Effectiveness
Achievemet of Purpose, Interest, Reception
2 20 12
Physical
3 Appearance, Body Language, Speaking Area 15 10
Voice
4 Flexibility, Volume 10 10
Correctness
5 Grammar, Pronunciation, Word Selection 30 22

Total Score 100 74

Judge’s comments (required): The content of the speech is not very developed
because the explanation of the theory of concepts is too excessive, too many theories
are presented so that it covers the opinion to be conveyed, in a theoretical speech only
as a supporter of opinion, not vice versa. The provision of articles has been very good,
but it is not explained that the correlation between the articles and this discussion can
be caused by the absence of development of the content of the speech due to the
things mentioned above.
*Judges may disqualify participants for gross misconduct and ineligibity
**All judges decisions and results are considered as final.

Jakarta, October 2021.

Judge

(…………………………….)
 JUDGING CRITERIA FOR SPEECHES
“PEKAN OLAHRAGA DAN PRESTASI PPPJ LXXVIII2021”

FULL NAME : UFA ANTIA R

CLASS :I
THEME : LEGAL OPINIONS AS MEANS OF CHECK AND BALANCES IN TRIAS POLITICA

MAXIMUM
POINTS
No CRITERIA POINT
AWARDED
SCORE
1 2 3 4
Speech Development
1 Structure, Organization, Support Material 25 22

Effectiveness
Achievemet of Purpose, Interest, Reception
2 20 18
Physical
3 Appearance, Body Language, Speaking Area 15 12
Voice
4 Flexibility, Volume 10 10
Correctness
5 Grammar, Pronunciation, Word Selection 30 30

Total Score 100 92

Judge’s comments (required): the content of the speech is quite good, there is data,
the article in question, even the relationship between the article and the opinion that is
built can be seen. However, after all the explanations of the article, it is still not very
supportive of the speaker's opinion because the opinions that are led are only based
on standard explanations of the article and are not developed well enough, it would
also be better if each paragraph has a clear common thread so that listeners will be
more carried away in a speech that is brought.
*Judges may disqualify participants for gross misconduct and ineligibity
**All judges decisions and results are considered as final.

Jakarta, October 2021.

Judge

(…………………………….)
 JUDGING CRITERIA FOR SPEECHES
“PEKAN OLAHRAGA DAN PRESTASI PPPJ LXXVIII2021”

FULL NAME : MICHAEL YUDHISTIRA LUMBAN GAOL

CLASS : VII
THEME : KEJAKSAAN DALAM BINGKAI TRIAS POLITIKA

MAXIMUM
POINTS
No CRITERIA POINT
AWARDED
SCORE
1 2 3 4
Speech Development
1 Structure, Organization, Support Material 25 18

Effectiveness
Achievemet of Purpose, Interest, Reception
2 20 16
Physical
3 Appearance, Body Language, Speaking Area 15 13
Voice
4 Flexibility, Volume 10 10
Correctness
5 Grammar, Pronunciation, Word Selection 30 25

Total Score 100 82

Judge’s comments (required): There are similiarities of the speech text with other
participant

*Judges may disqualify participants for gross misconduct and ineligibity

**All judges decisions and results are considered as final.

Jakarta, October 2021.

Judge

(…………………………….)
 JUDGING CRITERIA FOR SPEECHES
“PEKAN OLAHRAGA DAN PRESTASI PPPJ LXXVIII2021”

FULL NAME : JODI ANDREWIRAWAN HARTANTO

CLASS :
THEME : RESTORATIVE JUSTICE

MAXIMUM
POINTS
No CRITERIA POINT
AWARDED
SCORE
1 2 3 4
Speech Development
1 Structure, Organization, Support Material 25 20

Effectiveness
Achievemet of Purpose, Interest, Reception
2 20 15
Physical
3 Appearance, Body Language, Speaking Area 15 12
Voice
4 Flexibility, Volume 10 10
Correctness
5 Grammar, Pronunciation, Word Selection 30 23

Total Score 100 80

Judge’s comments (required): The speech was quite good, it contains data and article
wich support the speaker opinion. Howefer the way speakers bring his speech wasn’t
convinced enough and it makes the speech wasn’t convincing.
*Judges may disqualify participants for gross misconduct and ineligibity
**All judges decisions and results are considered as final.

Jakarta, October 2021.

Judge

(…………………………….)
 JUDGING CRITERIA FOR SPEECHES
“PEKAN OLAHRAGA DAN PRESTASI PPPJ LXXVIII2021”

FULL NAME : NURLIZA FITRIANI Br. ANGKAT

CLASS : III
THEME : THE APPLICATION OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE AT THE STATE PROSECUTOR LEVEL

MAXIMUM
POINTS
No CRITERIA POINT
AWARDED
SCORE
1 2 3 4
Speech Development
1 Structure, Organization, Support Material 25 25
Effectiveness
Achievemet of Purpose, Interest, Reception
2 20 17
Physical
3 Appearance, Body Language, Speaking Area 15 13
Voice
4 Flexibility, Volume 10 10
Correctness
5 Grammar, Pronunciation, Word Selection 30 30

Total Score 100 95

Judge’s comments (required): The speech delivered well, the data, words that is used,
costume and context of the speech really support the speaker opinion. The only thing
that is lacking is the body language of the speakers that probably being block by the
costume.

*Judges may disqualify participants for gross misconduct and ineligibity

**All judges decisions and results are considered as final.

Jakarta, October 2021.

Judge

(…………………………….)