(1-20) Mỗi Câu Đúng 1 Điểm: 1 Hướng Dẫn Chấm - Đề Chọn Đt Hsgqg - 2019

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

SỞ GIÁO DỤC VÀ ĐÀO TẠO KỲ THI THÀNH LẬP ĐỘI TUYỂN HSG GIỎI

BÌNH THUẬN LỚP 12 DỰ THI QUỐC GIA


Năm học : 2019-2020
Đề chính thức Môn : TIẾNG ANH

HƯỚNG DẪN CHẤM

CÂU 1: LISTENING ( 50 ĐIỂM)

(1-20) MỖi câu đúng 1 điểm


1. multi-use environment/ multi use environment
2. prints
3. rent reduction
4. Made to Measure (capitalisation required)
5. art consultant
6. Private/private (capitalisation optional)
7. historic accounts
8. (genuine/real) velvet
9. coal cellar
10. The Picture Dome/ The Picturedome (capitalisation required)
11. in-depth
12. struggles
13. gossip
14. challenging recipes
15. sophistication
16. special occasions
17. anecdotes/ funny stories
18. oral accounts
19. careers
20. scientific procedures

21_35: Mỗi câu đúng 2đ

1
Hướng dẫn chấm_Đề Chọn ĐT HSGQG_2019
meat importer
lasting influence
submarine
interchangeable parts
alteration of position
series of holes
piece of cooper
crane
Mechanics Made Easy (capitalisation required)
extension pack
A
C
D
A
B

CÂU 2: USE OF LANGUAGE ( 40 ĐIỂM_ MỖI CÂU ĐÚNG 1 ĐIỂM)

1.D 2.C 3.A 4.B 5.B 6.D 7.B 8.C 9.D 10.A
11.D 12.A 13.C 14.C 15.C 16.C 17.C 18.B 19.B 20.D
21.B 22.C 23.A 24.A 25.D 26.B 27.A 28.C
29.C 30.B
31. diversity 32. proximity 33. long-held/ widely-held 34.discontinued 35.
contradiction(s)
36. analogous 37. Disenfranchised 38. self-sufficient 39. long-lost 40. deactivated

CÂU 3: READING ( 50 ĐIỂM )

(1-14 ) Mỗi câu 1 điểm


1. would 2.who 3. retrospect 4. previous 5.by 6. out 7. having

2
Hướng dẫn chấm_Đề Chọn ĐT HSGQG_2019
8. silence 9.what 10. being 11.much 12.on13. himself 14. Least

(15-25) Mỗi câu 2 điểm


15.B 16.B 17.C 18. B 19. A
20.F 21.C 22.A 23.G 24.E 25.B

(26-39) Mỗi câu 1 điểm


26.v 27.iv 28.ii 29.vi 30.iii
31. deforestation 32. effects of deforestation 33. agricultural use
34. rate of deforestation 35. global temperatures
36.Y 37.N 38. NG 39.N

CÂU 4: WRITING ( 60 ĐIỂM)

WRITTEN PARTS
Summary
The author holds an opposing view on pursuing popularity as the ultimate goal of life reasoning that in
the technological age, the Internet users equal the level of fame to the number of virtual likes and
followers, paradoxically, who know nothing about them. (*) In her viewpoint, that one’s worth is
determined according to these superficial and ephemeral factors will emotionally and spiritually create
a devastating impact on subsequent generations. (*) Therefore, she puts an emphasis on inculcating
her children with sustainable values of life instead of having her children deprived of human priorities
and values by the external forces. (*) She highlights that adults’s educational ideology and proper
behavior -merely seeing achievements as an internal force bringing confidence - will help children
and even adults escape from the tiring rivalry for unworthy like-view-follow counts.

II. Essays :30 điểm

Use the rubrics:


- Grammar and usage: 5
- Word choice: 5đ
- Use of sentences: 5đ
- Organization and development: 5đ
- Thesis and purposes: 5đ
- Overall impression: 5 đ

III. Graphs: 20 điểm


Suggested key points :

3
Hướng dẫn chấm_Đề Chọn ĐT HSGQG_2019
- Overall point: undergraduate or the first degree courses became less popular over
time but the graduate courses were pursued by more people.

- The First degrees in Arts and Sciences lost popularity whereas the Masters and
Doctoral courses gained popularity after a period of nearly three decades.

- In 1980, a quarter of the graduates held a first degree in Arts, whereas only 12% went
for
Masters in Arts and a very small minority (2%) went for PhD in Arts. First degree
Science
graduates were a little under a fifth where as the Masters in Science graduates were
nearly a
third of the total. Only 13% held PhD degrees.

- In 2008, Graduates holding Masters in Arts and Sciences were 11% and 10%
respectively.
This percentage was considerably less as compared to that of 1958.

- The proportion of Masters in Arts and Science graduates was almost similar to that of
1958. PhD degree holders in Arts grew significantly from 2% to 7% and the PhD in
Science was held by 30%
which was also much higher than the figures of 1958

The End

4
Hướng dẫn chấm_Đề Chọn ĐT HSGQG_2019

You might also like