Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Ironically, while thoroughly entertaining myself elbow-deep in Guyanese pepper-pot, I received a work

request over the weekend to address the issue of Caribbean identity. I also became aware of a heated
on-going debate on our blog as to how we should define and boundary the concept of “the Caribbean” –
past colonial affiliations; imaginary lines in the deep blue sea; economic and trading blocks; shared post-
colonial democratic experiences of African, Asian, and European descendants in small, mostly island
states etc.

First, let’s helicopter up to 5,000 feet. Regional identity definitions are always going to be problematic if
you are looking for anything more substantive than who is in my geographical neighborhood. Our socio-
historic needs for nationalistic separatism and intra-regional comparison tend to play key roles in
blocking our view of regional inclusion. Don’t believe me?  Try asking our neighbors to the south and
west what “Latin American” really means. Similar colonial affiliations to the Spanish Kingdom you say?
Tell that to Brazil, Suriname, Belize, Guyana and French Guiana – not to mention the existing indigenous
nations who do not abide by immigrant territory demarcations. The same challenges arise with other
regional affiliations around the world, including Europe. So with that we can jedi mind-trick ourselves
into the understanding that our lack of consensus does not make us disorganized, ill-educated or
otherwise less-than inhabitants in other parts of the world.

Notwithstanding our new appreciation of our own discord, let’s take a more grounded look by way of a
definition that I find to be useful and appropriate on Wikipedia:

“The  Caribbean    is a region that consists of the  Caribbean Sea, its islands (some surrounded by the
Caribbean Sea and some bordering both the Caribbean Sea and the North Atlantic Ocean), and the
surrounding coasts … The Caribbean islands, consisting of the  Greater Antilles on the north and
the  Lesser Antilles  on the south and east (including the Leeward Antilles), are part of the somewhat
larger  West Indies  grouping, which also includes the  Lucayan Archipelago  (comprising
the  Bahamas  and Turks and Caicos Islands) north of the Greater Antilles and  Caribbean Sea. In a wider
sense, the mainland countries of  Belize,  Guyana, and  Suriname may be included.”

For geographical reasons, I particularly appreciate the distinction between the more focused
delimitation of the Caribbean and the broader view of the West Indies. For purposes of the English-
speaking islands, when we start to take account of historical and economic considerations, it allows us
to understand how the West Indies and the Caribbean have become interchangeable.

Remember the West Indies Federation? Established in 1958, the Federation comprised ten nations:
Antigua and Barbuda, Barbados, Dominica, Grenada, Jamaica, Montserrat, the then St Kitts-Nevis-
Anguilla, Saint Lucia, St Vincent and Trinidad and Tobago. Although it only lasted for five years, it was
one of the preliminary formations of British pan-Caribbean identity and shared visioning – the three
campus University of the West Indies (UWI) being its most notable legacy.

Fast-forward through the wave of Caribbean independence and Treaties of Chaguaramas to the
modern-day Caribbean Community (CARICOM), you will find a wider grouping of countries with a shared
understanding of how similar historical, political and economic contexts play a role in the development
of a regional identity.
Therefore, it is not coincidence that The Bahamas[1], Belize, Guyana, Haiti and Suriname are also
CARICOM member states. Furthermore, Anguilla, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, and
Turks and Caicos Islands, all constitute associate member countries of CARICOM.

Does this mean that CARICOM has an all-encompassing formula that captures every peculiarity of each
member state while establishing a common thread through all Caribbean/West Indian states? Well, of
course not. However, what’s important about its membership, and those in multilateral development
institutions, is that it establishes agency of citizens in the region to define the most appropriate
affiliation and regional identity as they see fit.

As an economic development practitioner, there’s nothing more comfortingly clear than that.

[1] The Bahamas is only a member of CARICOM but is not part of the Caribbean Common Market.

You might also like