Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter Iii Draft 2
Chapter Iii Draft 2
Chapter Iii Draft 2
METHODOLOGY
This chapter contains the research design, locale of the study, materials and procedure,
treatments.
Research design
This study would aim to determine the effectiveness of rice hull and saw dust in
prolonging the shelf life of tomato. It will determine how well the materials perform based on the
visual quality rating, color index, chilling injury, color quality rating, shriveling index, firmness
index and percent rotting of the fruits. The researchers will seek to know how different the
tomatoes depending on the kind of treatment used. The researchers will use three kinds of
treatments of tomato to investigate. The effectiveness of rice hull and saw dust in prolonging the
This study will use the quantitative research specifically, experimental research design
along with three (3) treatments that has four (4) replicates each, respectively. One (1) replicate
from each treatment will be use as a spare in a case of certain circumstances. The replicates were
The locale of this study is at General Artemio Ricarte Senior High School at #35 Bil-loca,
Materials. Rice hull, saw dust, paper box and tomato fruit Ilocos red and Diamante max
are the materials. Rice hull will be gathered at #33-S Rayuray while the researchers will gather
sawdust at Bacnat’s Furniture Shop at #35 Bil-loca also with the paper box. They will obtain the
tomato fruit Diamante max and Ilocos Red at #30-W Baoa west and #30-E Baoa east, City of
Batac.
Affordability of the materials used in this study shown below.
Procedures. The following steps in obtaining the needed data for the study were adapted
Preparation for the materials. The researchers prepared two tomato varieties with four
treatments with four replicates of treatment 1 to treatment three while one replicate for treatment
4 which is the control. Treatment one (1) were pure rice hull, treatment two (2) were pure
sawdust, treatment three (3) were the combination of rice hull and sawdust and treatment (4)
Preparation of treatments. The materials (saw dust or rice hull and tomato) will be
putted inside a paper box alternately. Thirty (30) tomato fruits will be placed on each boxes.
Gathering of Data. In seventy-nine (79) days, the twenty-four (26) replicates will be
observed once a week in terms of visual quality rating, color index, chilling injury, color quality
rating, shriveling index, firmness index and percent rotting of the fruits.
Visual quality rating. The visual quality rating was evaluated once a week using the
following index.
2 - limit of edibility
Tomato.
2 - definite break in color from green to tannish-yellow, pink or red not more
3 - more than 10% but no more than 30% of the surface in the aggregate
shows a definite change in color from green to tannish yellow, pink, or red or a
combination of thereof.
Chilling injury. It is a physiological disorder that occurs in fruits and vegetables and is
5 - no visible symptoms
Color quality rating. This was taken when the fruit reached chilling injury (Cl) 5. The
7 - deep red
6 - light red
4 - orange
1 - yellow
Shriveling index. Shriveling index of the fruits was ranked by appearance once a week
5 - no shriveling
Firmness index. Firmness index was determined once a week. In each treatment, two
fruits of each replication were randomly selected and used as sample. After determining
the firmness index, the fruits were returned back to their respective treatments.
1 - very soft
2 - slightly soft
3 - intermediate
4 - moderately hard
5 - very hard
Percent rotting. This was taken when sign of rotting was observed. Rotten fruits were
discarded after getting the data. It was computed using the formula:
Three treatments were used in determining the effectiveness of rice hull and saw dust in
Treatment Formula
1 Pure rice hull
% (F/N x 100)
Where:
%= Percentage
F= Frequency
N= Number of subject
The mean will be used to test the effectiveness of rice hull and saw dust in prolonging the
Treatment 1
1 2 3 4
Visual quantity
rating
Color index
Color quantity
rating
Shriveling
index
Firmness index
Percent rotting
Treatment 2
1 2 3 4
Visual quantity
rating
Color index
Color quantity
rating
Shriveling index
Firmness index
Percent rotting
Treatment 3
Color index
Color quantity
rating
Shriveling
index
Firmness index
Percent rotting
1 2 3 4
Visual quantity
rating
Color index
Color quantity
rating
Shriveling
index
Firmness index
Percent rotting
Treatment 2
1 2 3 4
Visual quantity
rating
Color index
Color quantity
rating
Shriveling
index
Firmness index
Percent rotting
Treatment 3
1 2 3 4
Visual quantity
rating
Color index
Color quantity
rating
Shriveling
index
Firmness index
Percent rotting