Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2015-08-27 - (Gapski, Mike) Final REDACTED - Condensed
2015-08-27 - (Gapski, Mike) Final REDACTED - Condensed
2015-08-27 - (Gapski, Mike) Final REDACTED - Condensed
Page 1
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
3 EASTERN DIVISION
4
5 IN RE: NATIONAL HOCKEY
6 LEAGUE PLAYERS'
7 CONCUSSION INJURY MDL No. 14-2551
8 LITIGATION (SRN/JSM)
9
10 This Document Relates
11 to: ALL ACTIONS
12 The videotaped deposition of MIKE GAPSKI,
13 called for examination pursuant to the Rules of
14 Civil Procedure for the United States District
15 Courts pertaining to the taking of depositions,
16 taken before Vicki L. D'Antonio, a certified
17 shorthand reporter of the State of Illinois, at
18 161 North Clark Street, Chicago, Illinois, on
19 the 27th day of August, 2015, at the hour of
20 9:08 a.m.
21
22
23
24 Reported by: Vicki L. D'Antonio, CSR, RPR
25 License No.: 084-004344
Page 2 Page 4
1 APPEARANCES: 1 INDEX
2 WITNESS PAGE
2 3 MIKE GAPSKI
3 CORBOY & DEMETRIO, by 4 Examination by Mr. Gibbs............... 9
5
4 MR. WILLIAM T. GIBBS 6 EXHIBITS
5 33 North Dearborn Street 7
NUMBER PAGE
6 21st Floor 8
7 Chicago, Illinois 60602 Gapski Deposition
9
8 (312) 346-3191 Exhibit No. 1.......................... 8
9 wtg@corboydemetrio.com 10 Exhibit No. 2.......................... 9
Exhibit No. 3.......................... 80
10 11 Exhibit No. 4.......................... 99
11 -AND- Exhibit No. 5.......................... 133
12 12 Exhibit No. 6.......................... 142
Exhibit No. 7.......................... 146
13 BASSFORD REMELE, by 13 Exhibit No. 8.......................... 146
14 MR. JEFFREY D. KLOBUCAR Exhibit No. 9.......................... 148
14 Exhibit No. 10......................... 157
15 33 South Sixth Street Exhibit No. 11......................... 163
16 Suite 3800 15 Exhibit No. 12......................... 181
Exhibit No. 13......................... 186
17 Minneapolis, Minnesota 16 Exhibit No. 14......................... 188
18 (612) 333-3000 Exhibit No. 15......................... 194
17 Exhibit No. 16......................... 196
19 jklobucar@bassford.com Exhibit No. 17......................... 203
20 Representing the Plaintiffs; 18
19
21 NOTE: Exhibit No. 17 retained by Mr. Gibbs.
22 20
21
23 22
24 23
25 24
25
Page 3 Page 5
1 APPEARANCES: (Continued) 1 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: This is a videotaped
2 2 deposition of Mike Gapski in the matter of the
3 BRYAN CAVE, by 3 National Hockey League Players' Concussion
4 MR. CHRISTOPHER J. SCHMIDT 4 Injury Litigation, Case No. 14-2551 filed in the
5 MR. TIMOTHY J. HASKEN 5 United States District Court, District of
6 211 North Broadway 6 Minnesota.
7 Suite 3600 7 This deposition is being held at
8 St. Louis, Missouri 63102 8 161 North Clark Street, Chicago, Illinois on
9 (314) 259-2000 9 August 27th, 2015.
10 cjschmidt@bryancave.com 10 The court reporter is Vicki D'Antonio,
11 tim.hasken@bryancave.com
11 and I am Kevin Ingstrup, the videographer. We
12 Representing the Chicago Blackhawks;
12 are both from the firm of Benchmark Reporting
13
13 Agency in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
14 PROSKAUER ROSE, LLP, by
14 We are going on the record at 9:08 a.m.
15 MR. ADAM M. LUPION
15 Will counsel please state their
16 Eleven Times Square
16 appearances for the record.
17 New York, New York 10036
17 MR. SCHMIDT: Chris Schmidt with Bryan Cave
18 (212) 969-3000
18 on behalf of the Chicago Blackhawks.
19 alupion@proskauer.com
20 Representing the National Hockey 19 MR. HASKEN: Timothy Hasken, Bryan Cave, on
Page 6 Page 8
1 MR. SCHMIDT: And Bill Gibbs of Corboy & 1 we do have a couple of authorizations.
2 Demetrio, also on behalf of the plaintiffs. 2 MR. SCHMIDT: Yeah. Should we get those
3 I'll just note, also present from my 3 admitted right now? That way, it will
4 office are Andrew Stevens and Fallon F-A-I-A. 4 allow -- I believe it's for Dan Carcillo and
5 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Thank you. 5 also for Steve Montador?
6 Will the reporter please swear in the 6 MR. GIBBS: Correct. So I'm not sure if we
7 witness. 7 need to make these exhibits.
8 (Whereupon, the witness was duly 8 MR. SCHMIDT: I think we should.
9 sworn.) 9 MR. GIBBS: But maybe we should, right?
10 MR. GIBBS: Mr. Gapski, we're going to take 10 MR. SCHMIDT: Yeah.
11 care a few just kind of preliminary matters 11 MR. GIBBS: Let's do -- Exhibit 1 will be an
12 before we get started questioning you. 12 authorization executed by Paul Montador as
13 First, I think Chris wants to put 13 executor of the estate of Steve Montador as of
14 something on the record regarding the 14 August 22, 2015.
15 designation of the deposition. 15 (Whereupon, Gapski Deposition
16 MR. SCHMIDT: Yes. We're going to, 16 Exhibit No. 1 was marked for
17 consistent with the Court's protective order, 17 identification.)
18 designate the entire transcript as confidential, 18 MR. GIBBS: And I've got copies for you guys.
19 subject to the parties' ability to meet and 19 MR. SCHMIDT: Thank you.
20 confirm, de-designate portions later. 20 MR. LUPION: Thank you.
21 MR. LUPION: And also to the extent that one 21 MR. GIBBS: And Exhibit 2 will be an
22 party objects to a question that is deemed to 22 authorization executed by Daniel Carcillo as of
23 apply to all, both the club and the National 23 August 25th, 2015.
24 Hockey League. 24
25 MR. GIBBS: So that's agreed, and we were 25
Page 7 Page 9
1 looking at Pretrial Order No. 6 last night. 1 (Whereupon, Gapski Deposition
2 MR. SCHMIDT: Sure. 2 Exhibit No. 2 was marked for
3 MR. GIBBS: Paragraph 10 says that the 3 identification.)
4 examining attorney may elect to waive the 4 MR. SCHMIDT: Thank you, sir.
5 requirement that objections be voiced regarding 5 MR. LUPION: Thanks.
6 matters that may be remedied if presented at the 6 MR. GIBBS: And with that, I think that
7 time and allow those objections to be preserved, 7 pretty much takes care of our kind of initial
8 in which event, such objections are unnecessary 8 stuff.
9 and shall not be made. 9 MR. SCHMIDT: I agree.
10 So I certainly will waive, you know, 10 MR. GIBBS: All right.
11 any requirement that you object to form, you 11 MR. SCHMIDT: Thank you.
12 know, through the entire deposition, really, and 12 MIKE GAPSKI,
13 then, you know, subject to you -- you raising it 13 having been first duly sworn, was examined and
14 at a later time. 14 testified as follows:
15 MR. SCHMIDT: I'll reserve my right to 15 EXAMINATION
16 object, but I -- I appreciate that. 16 BY MR. GIBBS:
17 MR. GIBBS: Yeah. And with that being made, 17 Q. Mr. Gapski, have you ever given a
18 I think, you know, it pretty much is privilege 18 deposition like this before?
19 would be the only objection that would be... 19 A. No, I've not.
20 MR. SCHMIDT: Let's do the deposition and see 20 Q. Okay. I'm going to go through a few
21 how -- how it proceeds. I have no intention 21 kind of general ground rules of what we're up to
22 to -- to say -- state a lot of objections. 22 today. I'm sure you've gone through it with
23 MR. GIBBS: All right. Well, we'll -- we'll 23 your counsel, but I just want to refresh your
24 proceed under that. 24 recollection on -- on a few things.
25 I also mentioned to you last night that 25 First, if I ask a question that you
Page 10 Page 12
1 don't understand or doesn't make sense, I would 1 Q. And how long has Mr. Thomas been in
2 ask that you ask me to rephrase it before 2 that role?
3 answering a question. If you do answer a 3 A. I believe ten years.
4 question, I'm going to presume that you've 4 Q. Prior to Jeff Thomas, did you have
5 understood the question. Is that fair? 5 someone else in that role?
6 A. Yes. 6 A. Yes.
7 Q. Just like you're doing right now, 7 Q. And who was that?
8 please make sure that your answers are out loud 8 A. Michael Keating.
9 for the record so that nods of the head, 9 Q. And how long was he in that position?
10 uh-huhs, or uh-uhs won't be accurately 10 A. I'm not sure. Probably four to six
11 transcribed, so we want to make sure there's an 11 years.
12 accurate record with affirmative answers to 12 Q. And before Mr. Keating?
13 every question. Okay? 13 A. Craig Brehmer.
14 A. Yes. 14 Q. And how long was he in the role?
15 Q. Because Vicki is taking everything down 15 A. I think two years.
16 that we say, in ordinary conversation, we may 16 Q. Before Mr. Brehmer?
17 kind of speak over each other or anticipate 17 A. No one.
18 where one another is going. If we could just 18 Q. You were on your own as the only
19 make sure that -- that we kind of give a pause 19 trainer for the Blackhawks?
20 between one another's statements, that will make 20 A. Yes.
21 her job a lot easier today. Okay? 21 Q. In addition to yourself, who else from
22 A. Yes. 22 the Blackhawks today is responsible for the care
23 Q. If there is an objection, and I don't 23 and treatment of the players?
24 think there are going to be, you know, based on 24 A. Our team physician, Dr. Michael Terry.
25 kind of the arrangement that we have, but if 25 We have other physicians on staff. Dr. Angelo
Page 11 Page 13
1 there is an objection, unless your counsel has 1 Costas, he's an internist. Dr. Mike Terry is an
2 instructed you not to answer, you are to answer 2 orthopedic surgeon. He's our head team
3 the question, even in the presence of an 3 physician. Angelo Costas would be considered
4 objection. Okay? 4 our head internist. We have other consults that
5 A. Yes. 5 we use that aren't -- wouldn't be considered,
6 Q. What is your current job title? 6 like, head physicians. We have a team -- a team
7 A. Head trainer for the Chicago 7 dentist, group of dentists, Dr. Russ Baer,
8 Blackhawks. 8 Dr. Marty Marcus, and Dr. Mike Marcus.
9 Q. And how long have you been in that 9 Q. Do -- do you utilize a team
10 position? 10 neuropsychiatrist?
11 A. 28 years. 11 A. Yes, we do.
12 Q. What are your duties and 12 Q. And who's that?
13 responsibilities today as the head athletic 13 A. Dr. Beth Pieroth.
14 trainer of the Chicago Blackhawks? 14 Q. How long have the Blackhawks been using
15 A. I'm responsible for all medical care of 15 Dr. Pieroth?
16 all of our players. 16 A. I'm not exact sure on the exact amount
17 Q. And has that been the same job 17 of time, but probably around ten years.
18 description for the entire 28 years that you've 18 Q. And are there any other specialists
19 been in that role? 19 that the Blackhawks utilize in relation to the
20 A. Yes. 20 care and treatment of players' brain injuries?
21 Q. Do you have an assistant athletic 21 A. Not that I recall. I mean,
22 trainer -- athletic trainer? 22 occasionally, we may use Dr. Hain out of the
23 A. Yes. 23 dizzy -- center for dizziness on occasion, and
24 Q. And who's that? 24 that would be all that I can recollect.
25 A. Jeff Thomas. 25 Q. And going back in time, 28 years means
Page 14 Page 16
1 you began in that role in what year? 1 assisting in that way?
2 A. 1987. 2 A. I think approximately a year or two.
3 Q. Okay. 1987, who was involved in the 3 He was a neuropsychologist.
4 care and treatment of players, along with the 4 Q. And was that during the -- the kind of
5 trainer? 5 early 2000s?
6 A. Dr. Louis Kolb was our head physician. 6 A. '97, I think, right around then. When
7 He was also an orthopedic surgeon. Dr. Howard 7 the league instituted the NHL concussion
8 Baim was an ENT who acted as our internist. 8 protocol.
9 Dr. Duresa, who was our team dentist. 9 Q. Got you.
10 Q. At that time back in '87, did you have 10 We just used the term "concussion,"
11 anyone -- any specialists that the Blackhawks 11 which will be utilized, you know, a lot today.
12 were utilizing in the care and treatment of 12 What is your definition of a
13 players' brain injuries? 13 concussion?
14 A. Consult would be Dr. Hilliard Slavick. 14 MR. SCHMIDT: Just object to -- to form, but
15 Q. And how -- when did Dr. Slavick's 15 subject to that, you may answer.
16 relationship with the team come to an end? 16 MR. GIBBS: Yeah. Again, I waive, you know,
17 A. When Louis Kolb left. 17 your re- -- your need to do that, so --
18 Q. Which was around what year? 18 MR. SCHMIDT: And I reserve my right.
19 A. I think it was 1997. 19 THE WITNESS: Can you clarify that? A
20 Q. From the time you started until 20 concussion is -- is -- is -- in terms is -- is
21 Dr. Slavick left, were there any other 21 pretty -- depending upon who you're reading and
22 physicians that the Blackhawks utilized in the 22 what definition you're talking about, there's
23 care and treatment of players' brain injuries? 23 a -- there's numerous definitions out there
24 A. Not that I recall. 24 regarding concussion. The NHL states or the --
25 Q. Now, when Slavick left in '87, 25 the Zurich conference states one thing, so
Page 15 Page 17
1 did -- who took over -- 1 theoretically or what they say is any altered
2 A. '97. 2 state of the brain.
3 Q. '97, I'm sorry, who took over the care 3 BY MR. GIBBS:
4 and treatment of players' brain injuries, if 4 Q. And I'm just wondering what your
5 anyone? 5 definition is.
6 A. Dr. George Cybulski was a neurosurgeon. 6 MR. SCHMIDT: Object to form.
7 Q. And how long did -- did he assist the 7 THE WITNESS: A -- what I would term is a
8 team in that way? 8 concussion is anytime somebody elicits certain
9 A. I don't recall. Two, three years, 9 signs that would regard -- that would -- would
10 maybe. 10 indicate that there's something going on in
11 Q. So that brings us roughly to 2000? 11 a person's head.
12 A. Approximately. There may be -- I 12 BY MR. GIBBS:
13 don't exact -- I can't recall when the 13 Q. Okay. And what are those signs?
14 neuropsych program or the -- the NHL concussion 14 A. Dizziness, nausea, inst- --
15 protocol started, which means Beth and one other 15 instability, confusion, loss of memory,
16 physician would have kind of stepped in also, 16 unconsciousness.
17 along with George Cybulski. 17 Q. Anything else?
18 Q. Okay. So have we identified all of the 18 A. Inability to recall certain things,
19 physicians that have taken care of Blackhawks 19 confusion, not feeling themselves, sensitive to
20 players' brain injuries during your tenure with 20 light, sensitive to noise.
21 the Blackhawks? 21 Q. Any other signs that indicate to you
22 A. No. 22 that a player may have suffered a concussion?
23 Q. Who else? 23 MR. SCHMIDT: Object to form, asked and
24 A. Dr. Bob Hielbronner. 24 answered.
25 Q. And how long was Dr. Hielbronner 25 THE WITNESS: Can you clarify that?
Page 18 Page 20
1 BY MR. GIBBS: 1 Q. Got you.
2 Q. You just gave me ten signs. 2 And at St. Rita, did you participate in
3 Are there any others? 3 athletics?
4 A. Those are -- those are symptoms. 4 A. I tried out for the football team. I
5 Q. Are there -- 5 had knee surgery, so I gave that up and I played
6 A. Signs are different than symptoms. 6 in the band.
7 Q. Okay. Are there any other signs and 7 Q. Did you do any athletic training?
8 symptoms of concussion other than the ten that 8 A. No.
9 you've just mentioned? 9 Q. At St. Rita, did you have any education
10 MR. LUPION: Object to form. 10 or training on concussions or traumatic brain
11 MR. GIBBS: Well, again, we don't have to 11 injuries?
12 keep doing that. I've -- I've, pursuant to the 12 A. No.
13 pretrial order, indicated that I waive that, and 13 Q. After graduating from St. Rita, you
14 pursuant to the pretrial order, if I've waived 14 went to city college?
15 it, then you shouldn't make form objections. 15 A. Yes.
16 MR. LUPION: Can I see a copy of the pretrial 16 Q. For two years?
17 order? 17 A. Yes.
18 You may proceed. 18 Q. And what did you study there?
19 THE WITNESS: Okay. Signs and symptoms 19 A. Chemistry.
20 are -- are two different things, so to -- you'd 20 Q. During your studies at city college,
21 have to put me in a situation where I would be 21 did you have any education or training regarding
22 able to -- to observe a sign versus a symptom. 22 concussions or traumatic brain injury?
23 BY MR. GIBBS: 23 A. No.
24 Q. Okay. Well, let's go through the signs 24 Q. After city college, then you went over
25 of concussion that you look for. 25 to UIC?
Page 19 Page 21
1 A. The signs of concussion I look for? 1 A. Yes.
2 Blow to the head, clutching/grabbing the head, 2 Q. And what was your major at UIC?
3 instability on the ice, extended amount of time 3 A. Started in chemistry and was changed to
4 to get up off the ice, significant blow to the 4 physical -- physical education with an emphasis
5 face. That's pretty much it. 5 on athletic training.
6 Q. And what are the symptoms -- 6 Q. Okay. Now, during your undergraduate
7 A. Symptoms are what -- 7 studies at the University of Illinois at
8 Q. -- of concussion that you look for? 8 Chicago, did you receive any training or
9 A. The symptoms are what I've explained to 9 education regarding concussions or traumatic
10 you at first, the -- 10 brain injury?
11 Q. The ten things? 11 A. Yes.
12 A. Yeah, the ten things. 12 Q. And in what form did that -- did that
13 Q. Other than the five signs and the ten 13 education and training take?
14 symptoms that you've identified, are there any 14 A. Athletic training coursework, advanced
15 other signs or symptoms of concussion? 15 first aid, and, you know, athletic training
16 A. There -- I'm sure there -- there 16 courses, practicums [sic].
17 probably are. At this point, I just can't 17 Q. Do you, as you sit there today,
18 remember them. 18 remember any of the -- the textbooks that you
19 Q. Okay. Now, you went to St. Rita? 19 utilized in learning about concussions or
20 A. I did. 20 traumatic brain injury back at UIC?
21 Q. What year did you graduate from Rita? 21 A. I can't remember who wrote the book,
22 A. 1976. 22 but it was Principles of Athletic Training.
23 Q. So what parish would you have grown up 23 Q. And is that a textbook that continues
24 in? 24 to be produced, you know, even -- even up to
25 A. St. Rita. 25 today with subsequent editions?
Page 22 Page 24
1 A. I'm not sure. At the time, that was 1 athletic training to UIC hockey players?
2 the state of the -- the state of the art 2 A. I believe from 1980 to 1987. It might
3 athletic training textbook. We've also used the 3 have been '81. I'm not sure.
4 American Red Cross first aid and advanced first 4 Q. And during those years, were the signs
5 aid books, and I used one other emergency 5 and symptoms of concussion that you were looking
6 management book. I don't recall the exact name 6 for in those players the same signs and symptoms
7 of it, though. 7 that we've identified here today?
8 Q. In addition to your coursework at UIC, 8 A. Yes.
9 you began doing some athletic training? 9 Q. During your time at UIC, did you ever
10 A. Yes. 10 learn, whether through -- through coursework or
11 Q. And was that the first time that you'd 11 conversation, that a concussion that is not
12 ever kind of performed that role? 12 properly managed could lead to permanent
13 A. Yes. 13 effects?
14 Q. Okay. Tell me a little bit about that. 14 A. No, I didn't learn that, because, I
15 Were you working under someone at that 15 mean, in my care, my -- my priority is to take
16 time? 16 care of our athletes and their -- and -- and
17 A. I was working under -- under head 17 health is their first risk, and I don't believe
18 trainer, Tim Ashby. 18 that we've ever mismanaged any concussions, so I
19 Q. And he was the head trainer for the -- 19 don't think I ever had that conversation.
20 A. He was the head trainer and also the 20 Q. During that time at UIC, did you ever
21 instructor or the director of the athletic 21 learn that repetitive head trauma could lead to
22 training program at the time. 22 long-term cognitive or mental health issues?
23 Q. Okay. And what sports were you 23 A. I don't recall.
24 assisting him in athletic training? 24 Q. You became the Hawks' head athletic
25 A. I was assisting in all sports. 25 trainer in '87, then?
Page 23 Page 25
1 Prima- -- my -- my primary -- my primary -- 1 A. Correct.
2 primary role was in -- assisted the hockey team. 2 Q. Did you receive any training or
3 Q. And who was the head hockey coach at 3 education from the National Hockey League prior
4 UIC back then? 4 to signing on as the Hawks' trainer?
5 A. The first coach was John Kantarski. 5 A. No.
6 Q. And was he the -- the head coach then 6 Q. Once you signed on as the Hawks'
7 when you were in your undergraduate years? 7 trainer, did the National Hockey League provide
8 A. My first year. 8 you with any education or training?
9 Q. How about second year? 9 A. No.
10 A. It would be Val Belmonte. 10 Q. Do you know whether back in 1987 when
11 Q. Was your role with UIC to -- part of 11 you first became the Hawks' athletic trainer
12 your role to provide care and treatment to UIC 12 whether the National Hockey League had any
13 hockey players who had suffered brain injuries? 13 policies, procedures, or protocols in place
14 A. All injuries. 14 related to head injury?
15 Q. And that would include brain injuries? 15 A. I don't recall. As a certified trainer
16 A. Yes. 16 of the league, the league required -- would ask
17 Q. And a concussion is a brain injury. 17 that all trainers be certified by the National
18 You would agree with that? 18 Athletic Trainers' Association, and that would
19 A. Yes. 19 be -- in that certification, all aspects of
20 Q. Did you receive any kind of on-the-job 20 concussion and injuries were -- were -- we were
21 training from the head athletic trainer 21 educated on.
22 regarding how to assess players for signs of 22 Q. Okay. So that was something that we
23 concussion or other brain injury? 23 kind of didn't talk about, being certified by
24 A. I don't recall. 24 National Athletic Trainers' Association.
25 Q. How long did you continue to provide 25 When -- when did you get certified?
Page 26 Page 28
1 A. 1982. 1 continuing education?
2 Q. And when certified in 1982, what, if 2 A. Continuing, it would be different
3 any, education or training did you receive 3 coursework. It would be -- there's a -- there's
4 regarding head injury? 4 a national convention which -- which provides
5 A. In order to -- in order to become 5 clinical symposiums on all aspects of athletic
6 certified as an athletic trainer, at that time, 6 training. I think it's a three- or four-day
7 you were -- you were required to -- you were 7 yearly conference.
8 required to have a bachelor's degree of physical 8 In addition to that, the Illinois
9 education with an emphasis on athletic training 9 Trainers Association or District 4 also has a
10 courses. In addition to that, you were required 10 district convention in which you -- we attend,
11 to undergo 1600 hours of clinical experience. 11 all which we -- we accrue the part -- part of
12 After that, you were eligible to take the NA -- 12 the 75 hours and they offer different symposiums
13 National Athletic Trainers' Association 13 and clinics on -- on various aspects of athletic
14 certification exam, and which I did. 14 training. I don't recall if I attended
15 Q. And so that exam, is there -- is that a 15 specifically a one on concussions.
16 written exam? 16 Q. So is it true that other than the
17 A. It's a two-part exam. It's a written 17 requirement that you be NATA certified, the
18 exam and along with a practical exam at the 18 National Hockey League as of 1987 didn't have
19 time. 19 any requirement that you undergo training or
20 Q. And were -- were there any written 20 education in the treatment of head injuries?
21 materials that you were provided to study up for 21 A. As a certified trainer, no. It's
22 the written portion of the exam? 22 expected to know these things.
23 A. There is no form of pre -- what do they 23 Q. Okay. And that's just what I want to
24 call it, prep -- preparatory work done. 24 know.
25 Q. Okay. Did you, in fact, pass that 25 The -- the league didn't do anything
Page 27 Page 29
1 examination in 1982? 1 beyond that?
2 A. Yes. 2 A. Not to my knowledge.
3 Q. Now, from '82 until '87, did you 3 Q. Let's take a ten-year window, '87 to
4 receive any continuing education in order to 4 '97. During that first ten years that you were
5 keep up your NATA certification? 5 with the Blackhawks, did the National Hockey
6 A. Yes. It's mandatory through the NATA 6 League provide you with any training or
7 that we -- we con- -- we receive continuing 7 education on the treatment of head injuries?
8 education course -- do -- do continuing -- 8 A. They may have.
9 continuing education courses. 9 Q. Okay.
10 Q. And is there an hourly requirement per 10 A. In that at our -- in addition to the
11 year or how does that work? 11 national athletic training meetings that -- that
12 A. At the time, I think it was 75 hours 12 are held once a year that -- that I attend as
13 for three years. 13 part of my 75 hours, the National Hockey League
14 Q. So -- so you would have to report your 14 Trainers Association, which we now call PHATS,
15 continuing education every three years? 15 also had a yearly conference in which we would
16 A. Yes. 16 attend to -- to accrue some more hours for our
17 Q. And did you, in fact, report that in 17 CEUs, which would have a number of symposiums
18 '85, if you recall? 18 and educational meetings regarding various
19 A. Yes. 19 topics on athletic training.
20 Q. Do you recall whether any of the 20 Q. So was the National Hockey League
21 continuing education that you received from '82 21 Trainers Association in place as of 1987 when
22 to '85 encompassed the treatment of brain 22 you be- -- when you began?
23 injuries or any type of head injury? 23 A. Yes.
24 A. I don't recall. 24 Q. And did that association have annual
25 Q. And what would that consist of, the 25 meetings beginning, as far as you know, or as
Page 30 Page 32
1 far back as 1987? 1 question.
2 A. Yes. 2 MR. SCHMIDT: I'm -- I'm going to -- I'm
3 Q. Do you recall any specific 3 going to actually interrupt at this point
4 presentations that were focused on head injuries 4 because you've now asked four times and he's
5 at the National Hockey League Trainers 5 giving an incredibly clear answer on -- on the
6 Association annual meeting in 1987? 6 record, and Counselor, I'd ask you to move on
7 A. I don't recall. 7 and I will assert my right to object if you keep
8 Q. And do you recall any specific 8 badgering the witness with the same question
9 presentations at the National Hockey League 9 over and over.
10 Trainers Association, or PHATS, annual meetings 10 MR. GIBBS: I am not badgering at all.
11 in the first decade that you were athletic 11 BY MR. GIBBS:
12 trainer for the Chicago Blackhawks? 12 Q. I -- I just want to know if you got
13 A. I don't recall. 13 anything from the NHL in your first ten years
14 Q. Okay. During that first decade, did 14 related to how you should care for players' head
15 you yourself make any presentations at any -- in 15 injuries. That's all I want to know.
16 any forum regarding the treatment of head 16 MR. SCHMIDT: Object to form, asked and
17 injuries? 17 answered.
18 A. Not during that time, no. 18 THE WITNESS: No.
19 Q. Do you know whether the National Hockey 19 BY MR. GIBBS:
20 League had any policies, procedures, or 20 Q. During those first ten years as
21 protocols in place during your first ten years 21 athletic trainer for the Chicago Blackhawks, did
22 on the job related to athletic trainers' 22 you observe signs or symptoms of concussion
23 treatment of head injuries? 23 following any type of head trauma to a
24 MR. SCHMIDT: Object to form, asked and 24 Blackhawks player?
25 answered. 25 A. I don't recall specific incidents --
Page 31 Page 33
1 THE WITNESS: No. They -- as a certified 1 incidents, but I'm sure I did.
2 athletic trainer, we would -- we were required 2 Q. Okay. During that time, again, kind of
3 to -- to know the care and management -- 3 those first ten years, if you noticed a player
4 recognition, care, and management of -- of these 4 exhibiting a sign or symptom of concussive brain
5 injuries. 5 trauma, what would you do?
6 BY MR. GIBBS: 6 A. I would remove them from playing. I
7 Q. Okay. And all I'm saying is -- is the 7 would -- we would eval- -- do an initial
8 league didn't have any specific policies, 8 evaluation and then we would turn the -- the
9 procedures, or protocols in addition to that 9 parti- -- player over to a physician for a
10 which you -- you would have received from or as 10 diagnosis. Athletic trainers don't diagnose, we
11 part of your certification; is that true? 11 evaluate, so all concussions -- all our
12 MR. SCHMIDT: Asked and answered. 12 concussions were diagnosed by our team
13 THE WITNESS: As a certified trainer, we are 13 physician.
14 responsible to know these things, and they 14 Q. During -- during those first ten years,
15 expected us, and at some point in time, I -- I 15 was it your sole responsibility to decide when a
16 don't remember what it's called, it was required 16 player should be removed from play in order to
17 by the NHL, NHLPA for all athletic trainers to 17 be evaluated for potential concussion?
18 be certified, which would include -- in our 18 A. Not sole job. I'm -- I'm -- it would
19 certification, which would include education 19 also be part of the physician's job also.
20 and -- on recognition and management and 20 Q. Okay. And tell me how that works, kind
21 treatment of concussions. 21 of how that interplay is between the athletic
22 BY MR. GIBBS: 22 trainer and the team physician as it relates to
23 Q. Okay. But -- and I -- I do keep -- I 23 removing a player following an exhibited sign or
24 will acknowledge I keep asking the same 24 symptom of concussion.
25 question, but I'm not getting an answer to the 25 A. If the -- a physician was -- was --
Page 34 Page 36
1 like, our physicians at the time were close by 1 Q. -- do you remember any specific
2 the bench. If they -- if they recognized signs 2 instances?
3 or symptoms, they would -- and I perhaps didn't 3 A. I don't remember, no.
4 see something, they can recommend or we would 4
5 just, you know, agree to take the person off. 5
6 Q. Okay. 6
7 A. Other than that, I would evaluate them. 7
8 If I -- if they exhibited any symptoms or signs, 8
9 then they would be removed for further 9
10 evaluation. 10
11 Q. And what would that evaluation look 11
12 like from your perspective? 12
13 A. It's like a four-point sign, symptom, 13
14 an eye test, looking for an astigmatism in the 14
15 eye, series of questions, both difficult and -- 15
16 and easy to answer on recognition to find out if 16
17 there was any what appeared to be an altered, 17
18 you know, state. 18
19 Q. And if after evaluation the -- the 19
20 symptoms demonstrated to you that the player may 20
21 be exhibiting symptoms of a concussion, you 21
22 would then turn them over to the physician for a 22
23 diagnosis? 23
24 A. Correct. 24
25 Q. During those years, were there players 25
Page 35 Page 37
1 that, after you recognized symptoms of 1
2 concussive brain trauma and you turned them over 2
3 to the physician, the physician did not diagnose 3 Q. And so am I correct that a player who
4 concussion? 4 has been diagnosed with concussion should not
5 A. Possibly. 5 continue to participate in hockey until he is
6 Q. Do you recall any specific instances? 6 symptom free?
7 A. No specific incidents. 7 A. Symptom free -- symptom free both upon
8 Q. Do you know whether, again, during 8 rest and exercise.
9 those first ten years any of the Blackhawks 9 Q. And is the same true for a player that
10 players continued to play in the same game after 10 exhibits signs or symptoms of concussion, he
11 exhibiting a sign or a symptom of concussion? 11 should not continue to participate until he is
12 A. I don't recall. I mean, it was the 12 symptom free?
13 team's physician's responsibility to -- to -- to 13 A. Correct.
14 clear a player, but I -- I -- I don't recall. 14 Q. And why is that?
15 Q. You don't recall any specific 15 A. If they're symptomatic, there's
16 instances -- 16 obviously something that's going on, and then we
17 A. No. 17 do not -- we -- we -- obviously, with our
18 Q. -- where you removed a player for 18 education, that's not the right thing to do to
19 evaluation, recognized a sign or symptom, but 19 put a player back into a par- -- you know, a
20 the player continued to play in the same game? 20 contact sport when they're under -- when they're
21 A. If he was evaluated by the physician 21 still undergoing some -- some symptoms.
22 and they cleared him, that may have happened and 22 Q. Would it increase the player's risk for
23 occurred. I -- I -- I don't recall. 23 further injury if the player continued to play
24 Q. And I'm just wondering -- 24 with demonstrated signs or symptoms of
25 A. Yeah. 25 concussion?
Page 38 Page 40
1 MR. LUPION: Object to form. 1 A. Three.
2 THE WITNESS: Possibly. 2 Q. And for how long a period of time?
3 BY MR. GIBBS: 3 A. Six hours.
4 Q. And what further injury are they 4 Q. During those conversations with your
5 risking by doing so? 5 attorney, which I don't want to know anything
6 A. Every case is -- is different. It's -- 6 about, was anyone else present?
7 I mean, I can't answer that. It's -- it's 7 A. No.
8 dependent upon the symptoms, dependent upon, you 8 Q. Did you at any time leading up to
9 know, the player, their role. 9 today's deposition have any conversations with
10 Q. I asked you before whether during your 10 any lawyer representing the National Hockey
11 time at UIC you ever heard that repetitive head 11 League?
12 trauma could lead to permanent damage. 12 A. I did not.
13 During those first ten years with the 13 Q. Did you at any time leading up to your
14 Blackhawks, did you ever hear that repet tive 14 deposition today have any conversations with any
15 head trauma could lead to permanent damage? 15 member of the Blackhawks organization?
16 A. I may have through one of our 16 A. Regarding this?
17 symposiums. 17 Q. Yes.
18 Q. And what d d you hear about that? 18 A. No.
19 A. I don't know the specifics. 19 Q. Did you at any time leading up to your
20 Q. Do you know whether the National Hockey 20 deposition today have any conversations with
21 League during those ten years ever warned its 21 anyone from the National Hockey League?
22 players that repet tive head trauma could lead 22 A. No.
23 to permanent injury? 23 Q. Did you at any time leading up to your
24 A. I don't recall, but, I mean, it's a 24 deposition today have any conversations with any
25 joint venture between the NHL and the NHLPA, so 25 colleagues in the athletic training realm?
Page 39 Page 41
1 they may have discussed that with their players 1 A. No.
2 because that was -- you know, that's a -- 2 Q. How about physicians?
3 concussions are a big issue, so I don't know 3 A. No.
4 specifically if there was anything in play, but, 4 Q. Did you review any documents?
5 you know, separately, I know there was warnings. 5 A. Yes.
6 I don't recall which -- which date and time that 6 Q. Okay. Did you review any documents
7 would -- that would go out to the players 7 that -- in addition to those that I designated
8 through the Players' Association through league, 8 as potential exhibits for today's deposition, if
9 you know, warning these players to be honest 9 you know?
10 about their symptoms and signs, report that to 10 A. I don't know.
11 your -- report that to your medical staff so 11 Q. From 1997 to 2007, your second decade
12 that you can undergo the right -- the proper 12 on the job, do you know whether the National
13 care and treatment. 13 Hockey League ever warned its players of the
14 Q. But as you sit there today, you're not 14 risk of permanent injury as a result of
15 aware of any specific -- 15 repetitive head trauma?
16 A. Specific -- 16 A. I believe so, yes.
17 Q. -- warnings from the league to the 17 Q. And what form did that take?
18 players regarding the -- the risk of permanent 18 A. The -- there -- there used to be FAQ
19 damage as a result of repetitive head trauma, 19 papers and I'd at the time post FAQ papers that
20 true? 20 would come out to the players. I think the
21 A. I don't recall that. 21 Players' Association would e-mail, possibly mail
22 Q. Prior to your deposition today, what 22 those to the players, and they would require the
23 did you do to prepare? 23 athletic trainers to post those on the -- in
24 A. Just talked to my attorney. 24 the -- in the locker rooms. We would post ours
25 Q. On how many occasions? 25 on the bulletin board, typically, in the
Page 42 Page 44
1 player's lounge. 1 were in the form of the FAQs and the materials
2 Q. And do you know when the league began 2 related to the neuropsych testing; is that true?
3 sending out those FAQs? 3 MR. LUPION: I'm going to object to the form.
4 A. I think I saw the first one, if I 4 It mischaracterizes the witness's testimony.
5 re- -- 2000, before that. But before that, 5 MR. SCHMIDT: I'll join. He's -- he's
6 there may have been verbal messages because the 6 explained several times those were joint
7 Players' Association and the NHL had to agree on 7 warnings by the NHLPA and the NHL. Counselor,
8 neuropsychological testing, so the players 8 you're -- you're arguing with the witness at
9 obviously knew that there was concussion issues 9 this point. I'd ask you to move on at this
10 out there that were going to -- and that we were 10 point.
11 going to take measures to evaluate and research 11 BY MR. GIBBS:
12 them. 12 Q. Can you answer the question?
13 Q. So from '97 to 2007, your knowledge of 13 A. Specifically, I don't recall.
14 the extent of the -- the NHL's warnings 14 Q. Are you aware of the National Hockey
15 consisted of FAQs which would have been sent to 15 League providing warnings to its players that
16 you and then posted by you and the materials 16 repetitive head trauma could cause permanent
17 that would have been provided to players 17 injury from 2007 to the present?
18 vis-à-vis neuropsychological testing, true? 18 A. It states that on one of the FAQs, yes.
19 MR. LUPION: Object to the form. 19 Q. Other than that?
20 MR. SCHMIDT: I'll -- I'll join as well. 20 A. No.
21 THE WITNESS: The players had to agree to 21 Q. Do you know whether the National Hockey
22 this neuropsychological testing, yes. It was 22 League has at any time told its players that
23 a -- it was a -- it was a joint agreement from 23 repetitive head trauma could cause permanent
24 the players -- from the league and the Players' 24 brain damage?
25 Association that they had to agree so that we 25 A. During that time period?
Page 43 Page 45
1 can perform the neuropsychological testing on 1 Q. At any time.
2 them during training camp. 2 A. Can you repeat the question again?
3 MR. GIBBS: I'll move to strike because that 3 Q. Sure. Do you know whether the National
4 was nonresponsive. 4 Hockey League has at any time told its players
5 MR. SCHMIDT: I disagree. 5 that repetitive head trauma could cause
6 BY MR. GIBBS: 6 permanent brain damage?
7 Q. Is it true that -- that as far as you 7 MR. LUPION: Objection, asked and answered.
8 know, the only warnings the National Hockey 8 THE WITNESS: And again, it was -- it was --
9 League provided from 1997 to 2007 were in the 9 I've -- I've noticed -- I've seen it on the
10 form of the FAQs distributed to you and any 10 FAQs, so it has been posted for the players to
11 materials distributed vis-à-vis the neuropsych 11 see.
12 testing program? 12 BY MR. GIBBS:
13 MR. LUPION: Object to the form. 13 Q. That term, permanent brain damage?
14 THE WITNESS: I would say that, but I'd also 14 A. Yes.
15 say that on the -- the FAQs, it was marked NHL 15 MR. SCHMIDT: I just object that the FAQs
16 and NHLPA. It wasn't just the NHL. 16 speak for -- for themselves.
17 BY MR. GIBBS: 17 Counsel, we've been going about an
18 Q. Okay. But that has nothing to do with 18 hour. Could we take a short break?
19 what I'm asking you. 19 MR. GIBBS: Sure.
20 MR. SCHMIDT: Object to form. 20 MR. SCHMIDT: Thank you.
21 THE WITNESS: Then can you ask the question 21 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is 10:00 o'clock.
22 again? 22 We are off the record.
23 BY MR. GIBBS: 23 (Whereupon, a short break was
24 Q. Sure. The only two warnings that you 24 taken.)
25 know that the NHL provided from 1997 to 2007 25 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is 10:14. We're
Page 46 Page 48
1 back on the record. 1 BY MR. GIBBS:
2 BY MR. GIBBS: 2 Q. What do you mean by working the door?
3 Q. Okay. I'd like to talk to you a little 3 A. When the players go on and off the ice,
4 bit about kind of how you as an athletic trainer 4 I would stand by the door and open the door in
5 do your job. Okay? 5 addition to -- so the players could come -- go
6 A. Uh-huh. 6 on and off the ice.
7 Q. And so most of my questions will -- 7 Q. And when was that?
8 will be general, and therefore, kind of 8 A. Probably '87 to '90-something. I don't
9 referring to your entire career as an athletic 9 recall how long.
10 trainer, but to the extent that things have 10 Q. And was that true of -- of your home
11 changed over the years, if you could indicate to 11 arena as well as all other arenas?
12 me that you're talking about a certain era when 12 A. Depended upon the arena. Home arena
13 answering my questions, I would appreciate it. 13 for sure. I'm not sure -- I mean, I don't
14 Okay? 14 recall any other arenas.
15 A. Okay. 15 Q. Are there any arenas today that your
16 Q. Where are you positioned during a 16 positioning would be such that you'd be working
17 National Hockey League game? 17 the door?
18 A. On the bench. 18 A. No.
19 Q. And what is the layout of the bench in 19 Q. And where is the team physician?
20 a National Hockey League game? Are you -- are 20 A. Depends on the venue. At home, he
21 you sitting next to players, behind players, in 21 stands right behind the bench. Outside -- the
22 front of players? 22 bench is enclosed, the posterior of the bench is
23 A. Standing behind players. 23 enclosed with a door, so the players exit on --
24 Q. So there is a literal bench that 24 into the locker room. There's a box there that
25 players sit on, true? 25 he stands, along with my assistant.
Page 47 Page 49
1 A. Correct. 1 On the road, it varies on the rink. He
2 Q. All right. And then behind that, 2 could stand right on the bench if -- in a -- in
3 there's an area where you and others are. 3 a doorway, observing the game, or if -- if
4 Who else is in that area behind the 4 he -- again, depends upon these -- the area. He
5 players? 5 might be right behind us on the bench or he
6 A. It's an elevated area. It varies on 6 might be in the locker room observing on -- on
7 height what -- what -- what rink we're in. 7 the television.
8 Myself, the coaches, and our head equipment 8 Q. And does the team physician travel with
9 manager. 9 the team?
10 Q. Where is the team physician during NHL 10 A. Currently, yes.
11 games? 11 Q. When did that begin?
12 A. In -- 12 A. Approximately five years ago, I
13 MR. SCHMIDT: Are you talking, just so we're 13 believe.
14 clear, currently or throughout time, because I 14 Q. During your entire tenure, has the head
15 think there was some variation on that. 15 athletic trainer traveled with the team?
16 MR. GIBBS: I don't know the answer to -- to 16 A. Yes.
17 that question. 17 Q. And is that true for preseason games,
18 MR. SCHMIDT: Well, on his prior testimony he 18 regular season games, as well as postseason
19 indicated -- 19 games?
20 THE WITNESS: Okay, let me clarify. On -- in 20 A. Yes.
21 the early days when we -- before we changed 21 Q. During your entire tenure, to the
22 stadiums, there was a period of time where I was 22 extent that you had an assistant, did the
23 not necessarily in front of the players, but I 23 assistant always travel with the team?
24 was working the door, so I had complete view of 24 A. No.
25 the ice. 25 Q. When did that happen?
Page 50 Page 52
1 A. Approximately eight to ten years, 1 time, essentially, in your office?
2 approximately. I don't recall the exact amount 2 A. They may.
3 of years. 3 Q. For what purpose?
4 Q. And what about practice? Let's talk 4 A. Sometimes social, sometimes just
5 about kind of preseason practice. You all are 5 to -- during a game, sometimes just to cool down
6 getting ready to go down to the University of 6 and get away from everybody. Sometimes for
7 Notre Dame for your preseason practices. 7 treatment.
8 During those practices, where will you 8 Q. And what does that treatment consist
9 be stationed? 9 of?
10 A. Myself or my assistant will be on the 10 A. Depending upon the nature of the
11 bench. 11 condition.
12 Q. And is that true of every practice, 12 Q. Could be as simple as taping an ankle
13 either -- either the head athletic trainer or 13 to examining a knee for a torn ACL?
14 the assistant athletic trainer is -- is 14 A. Correct.
15 monitoring practice? 15 Q. Fair to say that -- that you develop a
16 A. It's required by the NHL and the NHLPA 16 relationship with these players?
17 that a certified athletic trainer be on -- 17 A. Correct.
18 present on the bench anytime the players are on 18 Q. And you are sort of their first line of
19 the ice. 19 defense in the prevention of injury as well as
20 Q. And is that true of -- of morning 20 the identification of injury?
21 skates as well as practices? 21 MR. LUPION: Object to the form.
22 A. Correct. Anytime a play -- players are 22 THE WITNESS: Correct.
23 on the ice, a certified athletic trainer must be 23 BY MR. GIBBS:
24 present on the bench. 24 Q. Do you keep in touch with players after
25 Q. And has that been true of your entire 25 they leave the team?
Page 51 Page 53
1 tenure? 1 A. Some players, yes. Not on a consistent
2 A. Not mandatory, but I've always -- 2 basis or not on a regular basis, but, you know,
3 myself or my assistant have always been on the 3 I may here and there.
4 bench anytime the players are on the ice. 4 Q. Do the Blackhawks host any alumni
5 Q. Okay. Your current home venue, do you 5 activities for former players, if you know?
6 have an office? 6 A. We have an alumni box in the United
7 A. Yes. 7 Center that alumni players are there at every
8 Q. And can you give me a little bit of 8 game.
9 understanding of kind of the -- the layout of 9 Q. And do you visit with those players on
10 that venue as it relates to your office and the 10 occasion?
11 players' dressing room? 11 A. I do not visit with them. They may
12 A. Starting from my office? 12 come down and visit with us.
13 Q. Sure. 13 Q. Are there any on-ice activities that
14 A. My office is approximately 8 feet from 14 former players participate in as far as alumni
15 the locker room. There's a small hallway that 15 games or anything like that?
16 the players walk down, turn, and go into the 16 A. I don't recall. There -- I know they
17 training room, which is where my office is. 17 do play a lot of games and they play -- I think
18 Then the ice is about -- the entrance 18 they play on a weekly basis, the -- they play
19 to the hallway to get to the ice is 19 together on a weekly basis or a monthly basis.
20 approximately like 5 feet, then there's a long 20 I'm not exactly sure, so yes.
21 corridor they walk down to get to the bench -- 21 Q. Are you aware of any former Chicago
22 not long corridor. It's probably about 20 feet, 22 Blackhawks currently suffering from any type of
23 maybe, and then they're on the bench. 23 brain damage?
24 Q. So before a game, at the intermissions, 24 A. Not to my firsthand knowledge.
25 and after the game, the players spend a lot of 25 Q. What do you mean by "not to my
Page 54 Page 56
1 firsthand knowledge"? 1 caused by repetitive brain damage.
2 A. I mean, you hear things that, oh, this 2 Q. So you're not sure -- you're not sure
3 guy has problems. I don't know that -- I don't 3 whether the league ever told you or you're
4 know what it's the result of or I don't know if 4 saying --
5 it's a fact. 5 A. I'm not sure. We've had -- we've had
6 Q. Okay. And maybe -- maybe you 6 numerous seminars on concussions recently within
7 misunderstood my question. 7 the last recent years, and every year, we are --
8 I was just wondering if any of the guys 8 we -- we discuss -- we have a -- a conference on
9 has ever said to you, hey, I -- I have brain 9 concussions at our PHATS meetings, and I'm not
10 damage of any type? 10 sure if that -- those -- that was specifically
11 A. No. 11 brought up.
12 Q. We mentioned before the permanent brain 12 Q. Okay. As you sit there right now, you
13 damage that can result from repetitive head 13 just don't have a specif c recall of whether you
14 trauma. 14 have ever been told by the National Hockey
15 Do you know what types of brain damage 15 League that any of those conditions can be
16 can result from repetitive head trauma? 16 caused by repetitive head trauma. Is that a
17 MR. LUPION: Object to the form of the 17 fair characterization of your testimony?
18 question. 18 A. Yes. Right.
19 THE WITNESS: Not specifically. 19 Q. Have you ever warned a player on the
20 BY MR. GIBBS: 20 Chicago Blackhawks that repetitive head trauma
21 Q. Have you heard that Parkinson's disease 21 could lead to ALS, Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, or
22 can be caused by repetitive head trauma? 22 dementia?
23 MR. LUPION: Object to the form of the 23 A. That's outside my role. I -- I leave
24 question. 24 that -- I leave any conversation regarding
25 THE WITNESS: I've not heard that. 25 long-term effects of concussions up to our
Page 55 Page 57
1 BY MR. GIBBS: 1 physician.
2 Q. Have you heard that Alzheimer's disease 2 Q. Okay. So the answer to my question is
3 can be caused by repetitive head trauma? 3 no, you have never given that warning, true?
4 MR. LUPION: Same objection. 4 A. I have not.
5 THE WITNESS: I'm not familiar with that. 5 MR. SCHMIDT: Object to form, asked and
6 BY MR. GIBBS: 6 answered.
7 Q. Have you ever heard that dementia can 7 BY MR. GIBBS:
8 be caused by repetitive head trauma? 8 Q. True?
9 MR. LUPION: Same objection. 9 A. Correct, I have not.
10 THE WITNESS: Not that I recall. 10 Q. Okay.
11 BY MR. GIBBS: 11 A. I leave that to a doctor or physicians.
12 Q. Have you ever heard that ALS, or Lou 12 Q. Have you ever been present when the
13 Gehrig's disease, can be caused by repetitive 13 team doctor has told a Chicago Blackhawks player
14 head trauma? 14 that repetitive head trauma could lead to
15 MR. LUPION: Same objection. 15 Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, ALS, or dementia?
16 THE WITNESS: I do not recall. 16 MR. LUPION: Object to the form.
17 BY MR. GIBBS: 17 THE WITNESS: Meetings regarding those issues
18 Q. Fair to say that you have never been 18 are -- are done privately and I do not -- I'm
19 told by the National Hockey League that 19 not in attendance.
20 repetitive head trauma can lead to dementia, 20 BY MR. GIBBS:
21 Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, or ALS? 21 Q. So -- so you have not been present to
22 A. We may have had -- brought that up in 22 hear any of those, correct?
23 one of our seminars. I don't recall 23 A. Correct. That's outside my role.
24 specifically re- -- discussing -- I mean 24 Q. Have you ever been present when any
25 discussing that those particular conditions are 25 member of the Blackhawks organization, coaches,
Page 58 Page 60
1 general managers, team executives, have told 1 examined, demonstrating the presence of CTE?
2 players that repetitive head trauma could lead 2 MR. LUPION: Objection.
3 to Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, ALS, or dementia? 3 THE WITNESS: I may have heard that, but I
4 A. Not to my knowledge. 4 don't recall.
5 Q. What is your understanding of chronic 5 BY MR. GIBBS:
6 traumatic encephalopathy? 6 Q. And that's really what I'm wondering.
7 A. I don't have a comment. 7 I mean, you remember reading about Duerson's CTE
8 Q. Have you ever heard of CTE? 8 findings.
9 A. I've heard of it, yes. 9 Do you remember anything about
10 Q. In what circumstances have you heard of 10 Boogaard's, Rypien's, or Belak's CTE findings?
11 CTE? 11 A. No.
12 A. Just the literature out there 12 Q. Do you remember reading about Junior
13 that's -- that's -- that talks about it. I've 13 Seau's CTE findings?
14 not investigated myself, personally. 14 A. No.
15 Q. Are you a Bears fan? 15 Q. You were Steve Montador's athletic
16 A. Not really. I mean, I follow them, but 16 trainer for period of time?
17 I'm not a Bears fan. 17 A. Uh-huh, yes.
18 Q. You know who Dave Duerson is? 18 Q. How long were you his athletic trainer,
19 A. Yes, I do. 19 if you recall?
20 Q. Do you understand that Dave Duerson 20 A. I believe approximately a year and a
21 shot himself in the chest in 2011? 21 half to two years.
22 A. Yes. 22 Q. And have you heard that subsequent to
23 Q. And you understand that subsequent to 23 his death, his brain was examined and it
24 that, his brain on postmortem neuropathological 24 demonstrated CTE?
25 study demonstrated CTE? 25 A. I don't know if I'd heard that it
Page 59 Page 61
1 A. That's what it states, but the 1 was -- that it demonstrates CTE, but I know that
2 circumstance -- circumstances that arise -- that 2 he was being examined, so I haven't really
3 brings it to that, I don't really know what they 3 heard -- read the results --
4 were. 4 Q. You weren't aware of the results?
5 Q. Okay. All I'm saying is you read the 5 A. No.
6 newspaper? 6 Q. At any time, has anyone from the
7 A. Yes. 7 National Hockey League made any statement to you
8 Q. And it stated that Dave Duerson had 8 regarding CTE?
9 CTE? 9 A. No.
10 A. It didn't state the causes, but yes. 10 Q. You mentioned some literature that
11 Q. And earlier that year in 2011, it was 11 might be out there regarding CTE.
12 reported that Bob Probert's brain demonstrated 12 Have you read any medical journal
13 CTE on neuropathological postmortem examination. 13 related to CTE?
14 Did you hear that at the time? 14 A. Not specifically. I may have read
15 A. I may have. I don't recall. 15 articles regarding it, but I don't recall the
16 Q. Before that time, had you ever heard of 16 specific article and the specific information
17 any former NHL or NFL players whose brains 17 that it was regarding that CTE.
18 demonstrated CTE on neuropathological postmortem 18 Q. I presume, then, that you have no
19 examination? 19 opinion whether or not CTE is caused by
20 A. Dave Duerson was probably the first one 20 repetitive head trauma?
21 that I've -- that I recall. 21 A. I have not seen the data that -- that
22 Q. Were you aware that subsequent to Dave 22 suggests the causes of the CTE, so I can't offer
23 Duerson's brain study results being released, 23 an opinion. I'm not a physician. I'm an
24 Wade Belak, Derek Boogaard, and Mark Rypien -- 24 athletic trainer, so I can't offer an opinion,
25 Rick Rypien, sorry, died and their brains were 25 based upon not being privy to the results.
Page 62 Page 64
1 Q. Do you have any understanding as to the 1 we discuss it. Hypothetically, if a player has
2 reported symptoms of CTE? 2 concussion, there may be, you know, three other
3 A. I don't understand the question. 3 guys that may ask about what's going on there.
4 Q. Okay. Thank you for letting me know. 4 So we are constantly educating them,
5 Do you have any understanding as to how 5 letting them know that -- you know, what's going
6 the condition of CTE manifests itself in people 6 on with them, how we're treating them, how we're
7 who have suffered repetitive head trauma? 7 managing it, and that it's important for them to
8 A. I'm not a physician, so I -- I don't 8 let us to know symptoms.
9 know the symptoms of that and that's not -- it's 9 BY MR. GIBBS:
10 not a condition that -- you know, I deal with 10 Q. And so those posters tell players that
11 healthy male athletes, and it's not a condition 11 in their 40s and 50s, they may suffer from
12 that I deal with on a regular basis, so no. 12 memory loss, lack of impulse control, mood and
13 Q. But certainly, you care about your 13 behavioral issues, and potentially suicidality?
14 players and how they will be after they leave 14 MR. LUPION: Objection.
15 the game of hockey? 15 MR. SCHMIDT: Join.
16 A. Extremely, yes. 16 THE WITNESS: They don't say anything about
17 Q. And so if you knew that repetitive head 17 age. They -- they -- they warn about the -- the
18 trauma could cause later-in-life cognitive or 18 effects of -- of brain injury and the importance
19 mental health issues, that's something that you 19 of -- of -- they show the signs and symptoms and
20 would want those players to know about, true? 20 they warn about the importance to -- to report
21 A. Correct. And the information is out 21 any -- any of those to your trainers or your
22 there. 22 medical professionals.
23 Q. And if you knew that the symptoms of 23 BY MR. GIBBS:
24 CTE were things like a lack of impulse control, 24 Q. Okay. So -- so they do tell players
25 suicidality, aggression, depression, confusion, 25 that they may, in fact, suffer those things
Page 63 Page 65
1 memory loss, you would want those players to 1 later in life?
2 know that, true? 2 MR. SCHMIDT: Object to form.
3 MR. LUPION: Object to the form. 3 THE WITNESS: No. They just state that
4 THE WITNESS: Again, the information 4 they -- that these are things that we have to be
5 regarding the significant -- the effects of 5 aware of.
6 trauma -- chronic brain injuries is out there. 6 BY MR. GIBBS:
7 We have -- we have posters on the boards. We 7 Q. Things like suicidality?
8 have the FAQs that are -- that are posted in 8 A. No, of the conditions that -- that may
9 the -- in the locker room that are on the 9 cause -- may cause further damage -- repetitive
10 bulletin boards. But more -- and the -- the 10 may cause further problems down the road and
11 posters are posted both in the visiting locker 11 that these are the signs and symptoms that you
12 rooms and in the -- in the home locker rooms by 12 are to look for and that you have to make sure
13 every athletic trainer. 13 that your medical personnel are aware of those.
14 We've specifically -- we specifically 14 Q. And I guess I'm just -- I'm -- I'm
15 inform our players to -- you know, for proper 15 missing you.
16 care, you need to inform us of any conditions, 16 When you say signs and symptoms, you're
17 symptoms that you're having, and they -- we 17 talking about signs and symptoms of concussion?
18 can't -- we can't help you unless we know what's 18 A. Concussion, right.
19 going on. 19 Q. Okay. And I guess I'm talking about
20 So yes, there is -- I mean, written, 20 signs and symptoms of later-in-life cognitive or
21 yes, but there's -- there's tons of verbal stuff 21 mental health issues.
22 that we -- we do for these players all the time. 22 Does the -- do the posters warn of the
23 Specific incidents, I -- I -- I don't 23 risk of later-in-life cognitive or mental health
24 know, but we're -- we're -- I don't say on a 24 issues?
25 regular daily basis, but quite often, we're -- 25 MR. SCHMIDT: Just one minute. I'm just
Page 66 Page 68
1 going to object on two grounds. One, the 1 MR. LUPION: Objection.
2 posters will speak for themselves as to the 2 THE WITNESS: Again, there -- I'm sure there
3 exact language, so if you have one, you can show 3 was conversation, not just in -- from the
4 it. And two, asked and answered. 4 Players' Association and the league. I -- I
5 Subject to that, if you -- you may 5 can't specifically state when, but it's always
6 answer. 6 been a -- an issue. Obviously -- and that's why
7 THE WITNESS: It specifically states that 7 we decided, the league and the PA decided to put
8 chronic brain injury may cause death, may cause 8 these studies in place. If it hadn't been
9 permanent disability, and may cause -- there's 9 talked about or hadn't been researched or hadn't
10 three things. I can't remember the third one. 10 been an issue, we wouldn't be doing these
11 BY MR. GIBBS: 11 things.
12 Q. So it doesn't talk about any of those 12 BY MR. GIBBS:
13 signs or symptoms like suicidality, mood and 13 Q. I understand what -- what you presume
14 behavioral issues, forgetfulness, lack of 14 was happening, but you don't know -- you, Mike
15 impulse control, true? 15 Gapski, don't know of any warnings prior to
16 MR. LUPION: Objection to form, assumes facts 16 those FAQs, true?
17 not in evidence. 17 MR. SCHMIDT: Object to form.
18 THE WITNESS: It doesn't specifically state 18 THE WITNESS: I don't recall.
19 that. It -- it states that chronic brain trauma 19 BY MR. GIBBS:
20 could -- could be -- can cause problems down the 20 Q. During a National Hockey League game,
21 road. 21 what are the mechanisms of injury that can
22 BY MR. GIBBS: 22 affect the head?
23 Q. Does that concern you? 23 A. The -- I mean, the -- a stick to the
24 A. Does that concern me? 24 head, shoulder to the head, head to the boards,
25 MR. LUPION: Objection. Does what concern 25 falling, bumping your head, body checking. It
Page 67 Page 69
1 him? 1 could be -- there's -- there's numerous things.
2 BY MR. GIBBS: 2 I mean, if a player falls, he can get --
3 Q. That your players may later in life be 3 accidentally get kicked in the head. He can run
4 suffering from permanent brain damage as a 4 into the goalpost. He can run into the
5 result of playing in the NHL. Does that concern 5 stanchion on the boards. I mean, hit a body for
6 you? 6 head zone, hit somebody's -- any part of
7 A. Yes, it concerns me. 7 anybody's body.
8 Q. And do you know whether it concerns the 8 Q. Fights?
9 NHL? 9 A. Fights would be -- can be, possibly.
10 A. I'm sure, yes, it does, because I think 10 Q. After two players drop the gloves and
11 if it didn't concern the NHL and the NHLPA, 11 engage in a fight, most of the time, those two
12 these warnings wouldn't be posted in the locker 12 players are taken to the penalty box, correct?
13 rooms. It wouldn't be posted in the FAQs. 13 A. Correct.
14 Verbally, they wouldn't be -- this information 14 Q. Do you have any way to assess a player
15 wouldn't be -- wouldn't be disseminated. 15 for symptoms of concussive brain trauma
16 Conferences wouldn't be held on a yearly basis. 16 following a fight while that player is in the
17 Research wouldn't be done on a -- on a -- on an 17 penalty box?
18 ongoing basis. So yes, I do think that we're 18 A. Signs, not symptoms.
19 making a concerted effort to make the players 19 Q. Exactly, and that's why I said symptoms
20 aware and -- and make the medical teams aware 20 and not signs.
21 of -- of -- of proper care. 21 You cannot assess a player for symptoms
22 Q. And as far as you know, the first time 22 of concussive brain trauma following a fight
23 that that was done was the FAQs, correct? 23 while that player is in the penalty box, true?
24 MR. SCHMIDT: Object to form. I think it 24 A. Correct.
25 misstates the testimony. 25 Q. And neither can your assistant athletic
Page 70 Page 72
1 trainer? 1 to put them back in the game or not.
2 A. Correct. 2 Q. Okay. And -- and you've seen where a
3 Q. Or any team physician? 3 coach has decided to keep the player in the game
4 A. Correct. 4 after that?
5 Q. Or any medical personnel associated 5 A. Correct.
6 with the team? 6 Q. In those circumstances, that player
7 A. Correct. 7 cannot be assessed for symptoms of concussive
8 Q. That player ordinarily is assessed how 8 brain trauma while remaining in the game?
9 long of a penalty? 9 MR. SCHMIDT: Object to form.
10 A. Five minutes. 10 THE WITNESS: That's incorrect, because they
11 Q. And upon completion of those five 11 can be assessed, because once the -- once the --
12 minutes, that player returns to the ice? 12 once the penalty's over, they come to the bench.
13 A. Yes. 13 If the coach decides not to put them on the
14 Q. And continues to play in an NHL game? 14 bench, if -- if it's necessary, then we can
15 A. Possibly. 15 assess them on the bench, yes.
16 Q. And -- well, ordinarily? 16 BY MR. GIBBS:
17 A. It's -- that's a coaching decision. 17 Q. Okay. So the first instance that you
18 That's not my decision. 18 can assess, you, the athletic trainer can assess
19 Q. At least for -- for a period of time 19 a player for symptoms of concussion --
20 when -- when a player comes out of the penalty 20 concussive brain trauma following a fight is
21 box, he -- he plays in the game? 21 when they come over to the bench area, true?
22 A. No. When he -- when the players -- 22 A. True.
23 the -- the penalties -- when the penalty from 23
24 the fight is over, it's -- they get out at a 24
25 whistle, and then it's up to the coach to decide 25
Page 71 Page 73
1 where the player goes. 1
2 Q. There are certainly a lot of occasions 2
3 where a player continues to play after coming 3
4 out of the penalty box, true? 4
5 A. That's a coaching decision. I -- 5
6 Q. Is that true, though, in your -- 6
7 MR. SCHMIDT: Object to form. 7
8 THE WITNESS: It -- I've seen it, but it's -- 8
9 obviously, it's a -- it's not my decision to 9
10 make. 10
11 BY MR. GIBBS: 11
12 Q. You've seen over 2,000 NHL games? 12 Q. Because a sign of concussion is a blow
13 A. I have. 13 to the head, right?
14 Q. And so you've seen instances where a 14 MR. SCHMIDT: Object to form.
15 player drops the gloves, gets in a fight, goes 15 THE WITNESS: It can be.
16 to the penalty box, and comes back on the ice 16 BY MR. GIBBS:
17 and continues to play, correct? 17 Q. A sign of concussion is a blow to the
18 A. No. Again, they don't come on the ice 18 face, right?
19 and continue to play because once the 19 A. It can be.
20 whistle -- once -- the players are only allowed 20 Q. And if an NHL player has been involved
21 to come on the ice after a whistle's blown. 21 in a fight, more often than not, he has suffered
22 When the whistle's blown, they skate towards the 22 a blow to the head and/or a blow to the face?
23 bench because it's a stoppage of play, so they 23 A. Not necessarily. I mean, I've seen
24 skate towards the bench, and then that's a 24 numerous fights which is just -- which is a
25 coaching decision, up to them whether they want 25 wrestling match. I've seen numerous fights
Page 74 Page 76
1 where guys are throwing punches and they're 1
2 just -- they're -- they're -- they're not making 2
3 contact. I've seen numerous fights where guys 3
4 are throwing punches, they have body con- -- 4
5 they're -- they're hit -- punched in the bodies. 5
6 I've seen numerous fights where they -- they not 6
7 making -- they're not making contact with the 7
8 head. 8
9 Q. But you've also seen numerous fights 9
10 where players have received blows to the head 10
11 and/or face? 11
12 A. Correct. 12 Q. The league has never issued any
13 13 policies, procedures, or protocols specific to
14 14 how to deal with a player following a fight,
15 15 true?
16 16 A. I don't understand the question.
17 17 Q. Okay. We just went through your custom
18 18 and practice on how to deal with a player
19 19 following a fight, right?
20 20 A. Yes.
21 21 Q. The league has never issued any policy,
22 22 procedure, or protocol to you as an athletic
23 23 trainer on how to follow up with a player after
24 24 a fight?
25 25 MR. LUPION: Objection.
Page 75 Page 77
1 1 THE WITNESS: That's incorrect.
2 2 BY MR. GIBBS:
3 3 Q. Okay.
4 4 A. Because -- yes, it is -- if a player
5 5 shows signs on the ice of -- of some kind of
6 6 head trauma, then the officials are -- are aware
7 7 of the fact, and we are aware of the fact that
8 8 we can -- and that those players are then
9 9 removed from the ice for further evaluation.
10 10 Q. Okay. We might be getting crossed up a
11 11 little bit.
12 12 Has the league ever told you, Mike
13 13 Gapski, how you should deal with an NHL player
14 14 that has been involved in an on-ice fight?
15 15 MR. SCHMIDT: Object to form, asked and
16 16 answered.
17 17 THE WITNESS: Yes, because the -- the
18 18 protocol states that if a player is -- shows any
19 19 signs or symptoms of a -- of a fight, then we
20 20 must remove them from play -- we must remove
21 21 them for -- for evaluation.
22 22 BY MR. GIBBS:
23 23 Q. Okay. I guess what you're saying is
24 24 the same policies, procedures, and protocols
25 25 would apply to a player that's been in a fight
Page 78 Page 80
1 as a player that has gotten a stick to the head. 1 (Whereupon, Gapski Deposition
2 Is that what you're saying? 2 Exhibit No. 3 was marked for
3 A. Not necessarily. I mean, it would 3 identification.)
4 be -- if the player got a stick to the head, 4 BY MR. GIBBS:
5 like, you have to understand the nature of 5 Q. Does Exhibit 3 refresh your
6 the -- I mean, if a guy gets tapped in the face 6 recollection as to a time that the league has
7 with a stick or gets -- gets a -- a blow, a 7 reached out to you regarding a player continuing
8 glancing blow to the head and has -- shows no 8 to play in a game following an observable sign
9 other signs, just because -- they probably would 9 or symptom of concussive brain trauma?
10 not be removed. 10 A. Yes.
11 Q. Okay. I'm not sure -- it's probably my 11 Q. Okay. I'm going to show you a publicly
12 question that doesn't make sense, but -- 12 available video, "Dennis Seidenberg hit from
13 MR. SCHMIDT: We'll stipulate that. 13 behind on Blackhawks Jonathan Toews," that's
14 BY MR. GIBBS: 14 available on YouTube, posted by HockeyTracker.
15 Q. -- other than a general concussion 15 MR. SCHMIDT: I'll just object to form.
16 protocol that the league provides, it provides 16 (Whereupon, a video was played.)
17 no additional protocol in how to deal with a 17 MR. GIBBS: Let's pause it right there.
18 player following a fight, true? 18 BY MR. GIBBS:
19 A. I -- that's something I -- I don't know 19 Q. This video purports to show, at least
20 that. 20 on the still shot that we're looking at right
21 Q. Well, they've never told you anything 21 now, Jonathan Toews and Blackhawks trainer Mike
22 about it? 22 Gapski.
23 A. They've never told me. 23 Is that you?
24 Q. All right. 24 A. It is.
25 A. They may -- might be an 25 Q. We just watched footage in which the
Page 79 Page 81
1 official -- they might have instructed the 1 player was struck from behind and forced into
2 officials. 2 the end boards, true?
3 Q. Have there been occasions where the 3 A. Correct.
4 league has followed up with you regarding a 4 Q. And that player was slow to get up?
5 player continuing to play after demonstrating a 5 A. Yes.
6 sign or symptom of concussive brain trauma? 6 Q. That player grasped his head?
7 A. The question is not clear. 7 A. I did not see that.
8 MR. SCHMIDT: I agree. 8 Q. On the video?
9 MR. GIBBS: Okay. Why don't we do this. 9 A. Oh. Can you play that again?
10 MR. SCHMIDT: Bill, do you want to go off the 10 MR. GIBBS: Let's go back.
11 record and get a couple minutes to get organized 11 MS. FAIA: From the beginning?
12 with this? 12 MR. GIBBS: Please.
13 MR. GIBBS: I'm good, unless you guys want to 13 (Whereupon, a video was played.)
14 take a quick break. 14 BY MR. GIBBS:
15 MR. SCHMIDT: We're fine. 15 Q. Did you see him grasp his head?
16 MR. GIBBS: All right. I'm going to mark 16 MR. SCHMIDT: Object to form.
17 this as -- 17 THE WITNESS: I did not see him grasp his
18 MR. SCHMIDT: Are you -- are you going to 18 head. I saw him -- his hand come over his body,
19 want to kill the lights for this or should we -- 19 and I don't know if he was looking to get up
20 no, actually, that looks okay. 20 or if he was -- if he grasped his head. I did
21 MR. GIBBS: Yeah. I'm going to mark this as 21 not really -- it was -- happened fast. I
22 Exhibit 3, and it is, for identification 22 didn't --
23 purposes, NHL2221370, and ask you to take a look 23 MR. GIBBS: Okay. Let's roll it.
24 at that. 24
25 25
Page 82 Page 84
1 (Whereupon, a video was played.) 1 players that are placed on the Blackhawks
2 BY MR. GIBBS: 2 injured list?
3 3 A. That's unclear. I don't understand
4 4 what you mean.
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16 BY MR. GIBBS:
17 17 Q. Are you aware that --
18 18 A. If that were the case.
19 19 Q. -- that following this incident, it was
20 Q. And did he continue to play in that 20 reported that the Blackhawks informed the media
21 game? 21 that Jonathan Toews had sustained an upper body
22 A. He did. 22 injury?
23 Q. Did he then take a penalty? 23 A. Yes.
24 A. Yes. 24
25 Q. And do you know how long he remained in 25
Page 83 Page 85
1 the penalty box? 1
2 A. Two minutes. 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 MR. SCHMIDT: I'm going to object to form 11
12 at -- at this -- this time and object on the 12
13 basis of PMI and it's not something that, absent 13
14 an authorization -- if you have one, I'm -- I'm 14
15 happy to -- to share it with -- with you or -- 15
16 or Mr. -- let me rephrase that. 16
17 Mr. Gapski's happy to talk about the 17
18 care and treatment that was provided in -- in 18
19 this case if you have a signed authorization. 19
20 Counsel -- Counselor, do you have a 20
21 signed authorization from Mr. Toews? 21
22 MR. GIBBS: Let me rephrase my question. 22
23 MR. SCHMIDT: Okay. 23
24 BY MR. GIBBS: 24
25 Q. Do you have some knowledge as to 25
Page 86 Page 88
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
Page 87 Page 89
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22 MR. SCHMIDT: When you're done with the Toews
23 23 line of questioning, can we take a short break?
24 24 MR. GIBBS: Yeah. Let's take one now, yeah.
25 25 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: That's the end of Disk
Page 90 Page 92
1 No. 1. The time is 11:12. We are off the 1 (Whereupon, a video was played.)
2 record. 2 BY MR. GIBBS:
3 (Whereupon, a short break was 3 Q. That video --
4 taken.) 4 MR. SCHMIDT: Stop. Can you please turn on
5 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: This is the beginning of 5 the lights before we proceed with the question?
6 Disk No. 2. The time is 11:32. We are back on 6 BY MR. GIBBS:
7 the record. 7 Q. That video clip shows what?
8 MR. SCHMIDT: Before we go, I'd just like to 8 A. Shows Kris Versteeg falling into the
9 note we've been sitting here, waiting since 9 post of the net.
10 11:20 to go on. 10
11 Please proceed, Counselor. 11
12 BY MR. GIBBS: 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22 MR. GIBBS: Let's do the next one.
23 23 (Whereupon, a video was played.)
24 24 MR. GIBBS: You can pause it.
25 25
Page 91 Page 93
1 1 BY MR. GIBBS:
2 2 Q. I've shown you a publicly available
3 3 video clip entitled, "Andrew Shaw Takes a Puck
4 4 in the Face on a Shawn Thornton Shot, Chicago
5 5 versus Boston."
6 6 Do you remember that play during the
7 7 2013 Stanley Cup finals?
8 8 MR. SCHMIDT: Object to form.
9 9 Go ahead.
10 10 THE WITNESS: Yes, I do.
11 11 BY MR. GIBBS:
12 12 Q. There was a member of the Blackhawks
13 Q. If we go back to our YouTube playlist, 13 training staff, I believe, that was on the ice
14 which we should have up for a second here -- or 14 with Andrew Shaw following that incident.
15 in a second here. 15 Was that you?
16 MR. GIBBS: Why don't we dim the lights, 16 A. Yes, it was.
17 Fallon, if we can? 17
18 MS. FAIA: Sure. 18
19 BY MR. GIBBS: 19
20 Q. I'm going to show you a video clip 20
21 that's publicly available on YouTube that's 21
22 entitled, "Gotta See It: Versteeg smashes face, 22
23 gets penalized." 23
24 MR. SCHMIDT: I'm going to object to the 24
25 form. 25
Page 94 Page 96
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 MR. GIBBS: And could we go to the next one? 20
21 What happened there? No go? 21
22 (Whereupon, a video was played.) 22
23 BY MR. GIBBS: 23
24 Q. I'm showing you a publicly available 24
25 video entitled, "Corey Crawford stunned by puck. 25
Page 95 Page 97
1 Wild @ Blackhawks 5/3/2015." 1
2 Do you have any memory of that game or 2
3 any event surrounding Corey Crawford, the 3
4 Blackhawks goalie? 4
5 A. I do. 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14 Q. Are you aware that hockey operations
15 15 watches every NHL game?
16 16 A. Yes.
17 17 Q. And how are you aware of that?
18 18 A. It's known, obviously, because every
19 19 goal is reviewed, every -- every -- most plays
20 20 are reviewed, so I know that hockey operations
21 21 reviews. I don't know -- it didn't specifically
22 22 come out in a -- in a memo that hockey
23 23 operations watches every -- every game, but I
24 24 know that they do watch it.
25 25 Q. You mentioned before spotters.
Page 206
1 the foregoing deposition was reserved by counsel
2 for the respective parties.
3 I further certify that the taking of this
4 deposition was pursuant to notice and that there
5 were present at the deposition the attorneys
6 hereinbefore mentioned.
7 I further certify that I am not counsel
8 for nor in any way related to the parties to
9 this suit, nor am I in any way interested in the
10 outcome thereof.
11 IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF: I have hereunto
12 set my hand and affixed my notarial seal this
13 8th day of September, 2015.
14
15
16
____________________________________
17 NOTARY PUBLIC, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
CSR LIC. NO. 84-004344
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
30:12 32:21 86:6 127:24 64:18 66:8 C-O-G 202:9 carried 26:6 28:17
32:24 35:9 147:3 159:3 66:19 67:4 call 26:24 158:22 28:21 31:1
38:14 40:15 169:13 69:15,22 29:14 97:13 case 5:4 31:13,18
53:4,22 171:1 72:8,20 134:25 36:23 38:6 50:17,23
56:20 57:13 184:17 79:6 80:9 135:9 147:7 83:19 84:18 certify 205:7
57:25 80:13 185:3 93:22 147:19,23 87:18 205:15,25
80:21 84:1 boards 63:7 102:19 148:6,8,12 177:25 206:3,7
84:20 87:7 63:10 68:24 103:24 169:7 178:1 CEUs 29:17
89:20 90:16 69:5 81:2 104:10,20 called 1:13 cases 178:9 chain 100:12
93:12 95:1 86:6 87:21 106:8,24 31:16 casual 156:7 chance 85:15
95:4 98:24 111:4 132:20 138:13 caucus 167:25
99:5,9 113:13 145:10,11 145:9 132:16 168:1
101:20 125:23 163:16 175:13 cause 44:16 change
102:6 110:8 Bob 15:24 166:6,12 191:2 44:23 45:5 112:18
116:21 59:12 113:5 175:5 179:3 199:22 62:18 65:9 126:22
134:5 113:6 197:21,23 202:9 65:9,10 127:19
159:12,25 145:10 197:25 calls 90:24 66:8,8,9,20 128:1 129:8
160:11 146:1 brains 59:17 149:8 124:12,12 129:11,14
161:18 bodies 74:5 59:25 camp 43:2 164:20 129:19
162:5 body 68:25 Brawler 119:12 165:22 140:15
175:17 69:5,7 74:4 145:9 136:19 166:4 141:9,14
181:19 81:18 84:21 break 45:18 candid 197:21 143:15
188:16 86:6 87:20 45:23 79:14 162:18 205:10,18 144:1
191:21 92:16 89:23 90:3 163:15 caused 54:22 147:18,20
193:17 Boogaard 133:8 173:2 Canucks 55:3,8,13 201:21
194:20 59:24 173:6 175:17 56:1,16 changed 21:3
202:8 Boogaard's 202:17,23 Carcillo 8:4 61:19 76:6 36:8 46:11
blades 60:10 Brehmer 8:22 76:7 158:8 47:21
167:10 book 21:21 12:13,16 care 6:11 9:7 166:13 105:12
170:6 22:6 192:15 brief 156:3 11:15 12:22 causes 59:10 109:22
blah-blah-... books 22:5 bright 173:22 13:20 14:4 61:22 124:6,7,7,9
111:21 192:10 bring 155:17 14:12,23 Cave 3:3 5:17 141:17,19
blaming Boston 93:5 155:19 15:3,19 5:19 143:12
89:10 bottom 100:5 brings 15:11 23:12 24:15 cc'd 146:16 185:17
blanket 153:3 142:15 59:3 24:16 31:3 cc'ing 142:10 changes
153:4 box 48:24 Broadway 31:4 32:14 144:10 105:13
blood 167:25 53:6 69:12 3:6 39:13 62:13 censure 97:4 122:13,17
169:10 69:17,23 brought 63:16 67:21 censured 123:9,19
197:24 70:21 71:4 55:22 56:11 83:18 88:12 87:8 124:13
blow 19:2,4 71:16 75:17 Bryan 3:3 90:16,22 center 13:23 126:1 145:1
73:12,17,22 83:1 5:17,19 101:24 53:7 145:25
73:22 75:7 brain 13:20 bullet 165:12 105:24,24 certain 17:8 147:13,15
75:16 76:10 14:13,23 168:12,16 105:25 17:18 46:12 characteriz...
78:7,8 15:4,20 168:21 112:16 151:15 56:17
145:22 17:2 20:10 bulletin 41:25 129:25 180:1,2,18 cheap 101:17
177:10,12 20:22 21:10 63:10 130:3 151:9 205:10 check 183:6
178:7 21:20 23:13 169:12 163:1,9 certainly 183:25
blown 71:21 23:15,17,23 170:25,25 187:7 7:10 62:13 checked
71:22 27:22 33:4 bumping career 46:9 71:2 115:11 159:4
blows 74:10 35:2 36:14 68:25 90:17 91:11 certification checking
110:20 44:24 45:6 bunch 201:18 109:22 25:19 26:14 68:25
177:18 45:13 53:23 Business 115:21 27:5 31:11 checklist
178:3,23 54:9,12,15 157:18 118:3 191:1 31:19 182:15
blue 183:15 56:1 58:24 careful 93:25 certified 1:16 chemistry
183:16 59:12,23 C 113:8 129:3 25:15,17,23 20:19 21:3
board 41:25 60:23 63:6 C 205:3 167:14 25:25 26:2 chest 58:21
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
91:5 98:6 witness 4:2 152:12 75:3 177:2 105:22 Zeis 142:13
104:22,22 6:7,8 16:19 153:15 177:18 106:2,2 zone 69:6
104:23,24 17:7,25 154:16,22 178:3 116:10,16 Zurich 16:25
110:25 18:19 31:1 155:6,13 writes 144:10 124:17,18
120:23 31:13 32:8 156:20 144:20 157:25 0
124:6,7 32:18 38:2 158:16 162:11 158:2,11 0001315
125:10 42:21 43:14 160:3 161:2 writing 116:6 159:6 141:21
128:7,7,16 43:21 44:8 161:11,25 written 26:16 181:24 0109607
133:13 45:8 47:20 162:22 26:17,20,22 182:6,21,21 147:4
134:16 52:22 54:19 163:24 63:20 116:8 182:23,24 084-004344
147:2 54:25 55:5 164:13 116:8 200:9,24 1:25
162:23 55:10,16 166:17 119:17 202:1,2
163:4 57:17 60:3 176:5 126:12 year-to-year 1
166:14 63:4 64:16 180:20 wrong 112:4 105:14 1 4:9 8:11,16
172:20 65:3 66:7 182:14 wrote 21:21 yearly 28:7 90:1 196:22
174:19,19 66:18 68:2 186:7 wtg@corbo... 29:15 67:16 204:17
183:9 68:18 71:8 189:24 2:9 years 11:11 1:00 133:3
185:25 72:10 73:15 195:1 11:18 12:3 1:09 133:10
190:17 75:24 77:1 203:16 X 12:11,15 10 4:14 7:3
203:4 77:17 81:17 205:10,19 X 4:1,6 107:6 13:17,25 130:8,13
weekly 53:18 84:14 85:6 205:21,24 15:9 20:16 157:4,6,15
53:19 85:22 90:21 witness's Y 23:7 24:4 10:00 45:21
weigh 122:13 90:25 93:10 44:4 yeah 7:17 8:2 27:13,15 10:14 45:25
well-being 94:5 95:20 won 132:2,3 8:10 16:16 29:4 30:21 10036 3:17
151:9 99:13 103:9 wondering 19:12 35:25 32:13,20 10488 194:20
went 19:19 104:2 17:4 35:24 79:21 82:17 33:3,14 11 4:14 85:20
20:14,24 105:21 54:8 60:6 89:24,24 34:25 35:9 163:19,21
76:17 86:18 106:11 96:9 103:18 99:13 36:4 38:13 164:4 165:3
88:19,19 108:13,22 106:5 105:13 38:21 46:11 172:18
166:15 109:4 114:17 114:18 49:12 50:1 11:12 90:1
weren't 61:4 112:10 words 82:18 115:25 50:3 56:7 11:20 90:10
135:3 150:4 113:11,13 116:24 124:16 60:21 96:3 11:32 90:6
176:24 113:25 132:6 127:3,17 96:3 102:4 12 4:15
195:23 116:1 work 26:24 131:20 102:17 164:25
196:8 118:12 27:11 110:7 141:18 104:22,24 181:2,6
what'd 119:3 179:19 142:24 105:12,17 12:27 133:6
140:11 120:10,12 worked 151:23 110:7 13 4:15 186:1
172:12 120:21 202:14 152:7 113:20 186:5
WHEREOF 122:4,9 working 153:14 115:21,24 133 4:11
206:11 126:8 127:3 22:15,17 155:13 130:8,14 14 4:16
whistle 70:25 127:11 47:24 48:2 169:16,17 132:1 188:10,14
71:20 130:16 48:16 169:17 157:24 190:18
whistle's 134:8 works 33:20 170:14 175:1 14-2551 1:7
71:21,22 135:23 195:19 173:20 191:22 5:4 204:6
whoops 136:15 worry 111:22 182:23 201:1,6,7 142 4:12
200:5 139:3,12 wouldn't 189:22,23 201:12 146 4:12,13
wide 116:20 141:1,3 13:5 67:12 202:5 203:7 York 3:17,17 148 4:13
116:22 142:6,24 67:13,14,15 year 14:1,18 145:8 15 4:16
Wild 95:1 143:19 67:15,16,17 16:2 19:21 YouTube 115:21
WILLIAM 2:4 144:5 68:10 75:13 23:8,9 80:14 91:13 150:18,20
willing 145:15,17 129:21 27:11 29:12 91:21 158:9,21
129:19 146:13 151:2 56:7 59:11 175:16 194:19,22
window 29:3 147:18 176:25 60:20 98:3 157 4:14
wing 186:11 148:25 177:4,20 98:4,5 99:7 Z 16 4:17 149:7
186:21,23 149:22 wrestling 104:21,21 Z-E-I-S 196:14,18
wings 187:5 151:23 73:25 74:23 105:7,7,22 142:13 1600 26:11
Page 234