Historical interpretation relies on examining primary and secondary sources to describe, analyze, evaluate, and explain past events from the historian's perspective. Exploring multiple perspectives, known as multiperspectivity, requires using sources that reflect different views rather than just dominant groups. The 1872 Cavite Mutiny in the Philippines marked the beginning of Filipino nationalism, sparked by taxes imposed on military men. The first Catholic mass in the Philippines took place in Butuan on Easter Sunday in 1521, according to Pigafetta's chronicle. Non-written sources are still useful as primary sources because their oral nature does not make them inherently unreliable or incomplete, despite potential for distortion, as they can still reveal important historical information.
Historical interpretation relies on examining primary and secondary sources to describe, analyze, evaluate, and explain past events from the historian's perspective. Exploring multiple perspectives, known as multiperspectivity, requires using sources that reflect different views rather than just dominant groups. The 1872 Cavite Mutiny in the Philippines marked the beginning of Filipino nationalism, sparked by taxes imposed on military men. The first Catholic mass in the Philippines took place in Butuan on Easter Sunday in 1521, according to Pigafetta's chronicle. Non-written sources are still useful as primary sources because their oral nature does not make them inherently unreliable or incomplete, despite potential for distortion, as they can still reveal important historical information.
Historical interpretation relies on examining primary and secondary sources to describe, analyze, evaluate, and explain past events from the historian's perspective. Exploring multiple perspectives, known as multiperspectivity, requires using sources that reflect different views rather than just dominant groups. The 1872 Cavite Mutiny in the Philippines marked the beginning of Filipino nationalism, sparked by taxes imposed on military men. The first Catholic mass in the Philippines took place in Butuan on Easter Sunday in 1521, according to Pigafetta's chronicle. Non-written sources are still useful as primary sources because their oral nature does not make them inherently unreliable or incomplete, despite potential for distortion, as they can still reveal important historical information.
Historical interpretation relies on examining primary and secondary sources to describe, analyze, evaluate, and explain past events from the historian's perspective. Exploring multiple perspectives, known as multiperspectivity, requires using sources that reflect different views rather than just dominant groups. The 1872 Cavite Mutiny in the Philippines marked the beginning of Filipino nationalism, sparked by taxes imposed on military men. The first Catholic mass in the Philippines took place in Butuan on Easter Sunday in 1521, according to Pigafetta's chronicle. Non-written sources are still useful as primary sources because their oral nature does not make them inherently unreliable or incomplete, despite potential for distortion, as they can still reveal important historical information.
1. Explain how historical interpretations are based on the historian's
judgement on how the past should be seen? >> The historian's process of describing, analyzing, evaluating, and creating an explanation for previous events is known as historical interpretation. They rely on primary and secondary historical sources to make their interpretations. Evidence, settings, points of view, and frames of reference are all examined. It's a difficult process, but with practice, historical reasoning becomes easier. Causation (what caused something to happen), processes (revolutions, economic depressions), conflicts (social class, race, gender), historical outcomes (effects of past events), and many other subjects may be explored during interpretation. 2. Is Multiperspectivity a quality of historical writing attributed to a variety of lenses that may be used to view the past? >> Exploring multiple perspectives, also known as multiperspectivity, requires the use of source materials that reflect several perspectives on a historical event. Scholars and educators have begun to doubt the validity of single (one-sided) historical narratives in recent decades. They advise using different perspectives rather than focusing solely on dominant groups and communities. One explanation for this is growing variety and cultural heterogeneity, as many groups have been overlooked in traditional historical narratives, such as women, the poor, ethnic minorities, and so on. 3. What happened in Cavite Mutiny? >> The Cavite Mutiny of 1872 was a rebellion of military men in Fort San Felipe, Cavite's Spanish arsenal. Around 200 troops and laborers rose up with the hopes of sparking a national rebellion. The mutiny fails, and the government clamps down on a growing nationalist movement. Many experts believe that the 1872 Cavite Mutiny marked the start of Filipino nationalism, which would eventually lead to the 1896 Philippine Revolution. The mutiny is thought to have been sparked by Governor-General Rafael de Izquierdo's decision to subject the Engineering and Artillery Corps' men to personal taxes, which they had previously been exempt from. The mutiny began on January 20, when the employees got their paychecks and saw that the taxes, as well as the falla, the fine paid to be excused from forced labor, had been withheld from their salary. 4. Where did the First Catholic Mass take place in the Phil. from Pigafetta's chronicle? >> In his account, Pigafetta mentions that the first Mass is conducted in Butuan on Easter Sunday, March 31. Magellan ordered a Mass, which was officiated by Father Pedro Valderrama, the fleet's Andalusion chaplain and the sole priest at the time. The First Holy Mass, held near the island's coastlines, marked the beginning of Roman Catholicism in the Philippines. And Pigafetta's chronicle was one of the most frequently mentioned documents by historians researching the pre-colonial Philippines. 5. Is non-written documents are not useful as primary sources in conducting historical research, why?
>> No, because of their impermanent character, non-written, or oral, sources
have been suggested to be more susceptible to distortion than written sources. The incomplete nature of the oral source exposes it to distortion by the hearer, since the written word has connotations of permanence and authority. Because all oral sources have the potential to be continued to reveal more important information for the historian, this leads to the oral source's inherent incompleteness, exposing it to further speculation and distortion by the hearer, who views the source as a work in progress.