Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Defunctos in Memoriis Tulit
Defunctos in Memoriis Tulit
Defunctos in Memoriis Tulit
Thomas Bailey
November 8, 2010
In the beginning was death, and death was with O’Brien, and death was O’Brien. Death
was in the beginning with O’Brien. All things came to be through O’Brien, and without death
nothing came to be. What came to be through him was life, and this life was the light of the
human race. The end of Tim O’Brien’s The Things They Carried holds the key to unlocking the
value of the work. “As a writer now, I want to save Linda’s life. Not her body – her life. … [I]n
a story I can steal her soul. I can revive … that which is absolute and unchanging” (O’Brien
236). Who is dead? Who is alive? Is death the end or the beginning? What makes us dead? Is
“On the Rainy River” the narrator/protagonist is offered a choice – flee to Canada or fight
in Vietnam; the choice he made, which, by his own admission, was the wrong one. He simply
froze in fear. The imagery that O’Brien employs to describe the experience is related to death.
O’Brien felt the pressure in his chest – heart attack; an overwhelming sorrow – depression and
suicide; a drowning sensation; and his life flashing before his eyes – the moment of death
(O’Brien 56-57). The narrator has ceased to exist, ceased to be alive. Within the construct of
The Things They Carried it is the telling or retelling the story that gives life and truth to the
event. The stories that are told more than once are always those of death, bringing the dead to
life, “at least briefly” (O’Brien 236) for “the remembering is turned into a kind of rehappening”
(O’Brien 32). Whether it is to honor the dead, to alleviate his guilt, or to just make a buck, the
Bailey 2
scenes of the dead are highlighted, remembered, anamnesized, made important. Elroy Berdhal is
not telling the story of Tim O’Brien. Who is telling that story – the means by which we live? “I
realize it is as Tim trying to save Timmy’s life with a story” (O’Brien 246); but Tim does not
because the stories are of others not himself. Timmy is dead and forgotten.
“Sweetheart of the Song Tra Bong.” If storytelling is the capturing of the soul and anamnesis of
the person, then the ending of Rat Kiley’s story is a clarion call of lasting life. O’Brien allows
for the temporary resurrection of the dead, but in the manner of all good stories they are never
told only once. Mary Anne walked into the jungle and that was enough for Rat, it is Mitchell
Sanders who demands more (O’Brien 114). When pressed, Mary Anne simply “joined the
missing” and did not die because Rat told her story, the Greenies continued her story, Tim
O’Brien has forwarded us the story, and now we tell the story. Mary Anne lives! And between
the tellings, she and all the dead simply wait (O’Brien 245).
O’Brien demonstrates the centrality of death/life in The Things They Carried through the
device of reiteration. When we are first introduced to Ted Lavender, the reader is told that he
“carried tranquilizers until he was shot in the head” (O’Brien 2). On the following page, O’Brien
again describes Lavender as always carrying “6 or 7 ounces of premium dope” prior to being
shot (O’Brien 3). It is such a short span of time before retelling the descriptors. Why the need?
O’Brien fears that Lavender will be ensnared by Pluto and Hades forever if the reader forgets.
Even in his real life, Lavender did not live as he walked in a haze of existence, a drug-infused
mellowness. Lavender can therefore have meaning in a retold life, perhaps even a moral.
We hear a similar description of the dead Vietcong soldier on the side of the road, “[h]is
jaw was in his throat … [h]is one eye was shut … [the] other a star-shaped hole” (O’Brien 124;
Bailey 3
126; 180). The death of Kiowa is related three times, once attributed to the helplessness of
Norman Baker (O’Brien 149), the other attributed to the helplessness of an unnamed young
soldier (O’Brien 170-71), and the third attributed to the helplessness of Tim O’Brien (O’Brien
186). In the same way Curt Lemon’s death is told as both an eyewitness account and as a letter
written by Rat Kiley to Curt’s girlfriend. All of them are dead. It matters not to O’Brien if the
dead was a friend, an enemy, a luckless man at the wrong place, or a childhood love – he wants
them all to live again and for eternity. So he tells their story.
The prehistoric inhabitants of Orkney Island routinely visited the burial mounds of their
ancestors, handling their bones to reanimate them. The Greek gods, demigods, and heroes were
placed into the heavens as reminders of their deeds. The ancient Chinese left offerings to their
ancestors so that they would aid them in the corporeal world. The central act of Christian
worship, the Eucharist, is done in remembrance of Jesus Christ. Even modern wakes, are filled
with the tales of the deceased to stave off mourning and to show how they changed or affected
“The Man I Killed” and “Ambush” both relate the story of the death of the same
Vietcong soldier outside of My Khe. The mutilated remains of the soldier’s body is described in
horrific detail and certain elements (clean fingernails, slim, non-muscular) suggests to O’Brien
that this man was “a scholar, maybe” (O’Brien 124). The author uses the hypothetical “maybe”
only twice more as he explores the soldier’s past. It then slips to fact. “He was not a
Communist,” but a patriotic man though not a fighter. He was a man who preferred books
(O’Brien 125), attended the university in Saigon, where he wrote love poetry and married a
Despite the obvious carnage and death, there is also a way in which O’Brien attempts to
describe the Vietcong soldier that moves him back to the living. There is a technical nature to
the wounds of death, precision in describing the colors and the anatomical elements. Despite
Kiowa’s demand to look away, Tim only continues to stare. He stares until life-filled features
return to the man. He focuses on the butterfly, the man’s freckles, nose, and the smoothness of
his right cheek – a beautiful man (O’Brien 127). He has humanized his enemy and finds remorse
and seeks now to make amends for the taking of his life. The only means at O’Brien’s disposal
is to tell the man’s story. The veracity is not what is important, but that he be resurrected.
The life O’Brien creates for the Vietcong soldier possesses parallels to his own life.
O’Brien sees in his weakness on the Rainy River no cause for remembrance and so that by
interspersing his life with the soldier he will then live as this soldier’s story is told. They share in
common folkloric nationalism, a desire for knowledge, distaste for war, a love for a girl, and a
desire that the fighting would pass them by. Tim O’Brien stares into the gapping hole that once
was an eye and is paralyzed, just as he was on the river twenty yards from Canada and unable to
make the right decision. It is the Vietnamese soldier who is alive. He has his books, his wife,
his patriotism, while O’Brien sits in his purgatory unable to do what was right because he lacked
courage, unlike this soldier, who despite the knowledge of his inadequacies, fulfilled his duty
with pride. If only he can connect himself to the soldier, then Timmy will live.
A fascinating exchange between Tim O’Brien and his daughter occurs in “Ambush.” The
precocious nine-year-old asks her father if as a soldier he ever killed anyone. His initial response
is negative (O’Brien 131); and yet he did and did not (O’Brien 180). The jungles of Vietnam
were a kill or be killed atmosphere. “But in a story … the dead sometimes smile and sit up and
Linda, a nine-year-old girl “who had died of a brain tumor back in fifth grade” (O’Brien
58) was the protagonist’s first experience of storytelling’s power to resurrect. He recalls his love
for her, his first date, and even his failure to stand up for her (O’Brien 228-229; 233-234). He
still vividly recalled her death and its horrific face at the funeral parlor (O’Brien 241-242). How
appropriate that their first date together included the movie The Man Who Never Was, which
demonstrated the power, life, ability, and importance of the dead. D-Day succeeded in the movie
After hearing of Linda’s death, he uses the power of storytelling to bring her to life again.
He laid on the floor in his living room and willed her into his mind, where she walked down
Main Street (O’Brien 237). In his story he sits down to cry and Linda comes to comfort him and
she touched him (O’Brien 238). Again he attempts to have her live following his visit to the
funeral home. He willed his dreams, his unconscious stories to come to him and here Linda was
alive and was merely waiting to have her story told once again. The imagination of a child is a
powerful thing!
Storytelling is a necessity like water, food, and air; without which we cease to exist.
Whether or not it is to guarantee his own immortality or perhaps the altruism of saving others’
lives at the expense of his own is unknown. It is something that he cannot stop doing. The well
intentioned, the well meaning, the kind and sympathetic can miss the point of O’Brien’s stories.
Independently they can be the mere ramblings of a lonely man. Or they are the words of a
prophet and savior. To those who wish to tell him to put these stories behind him, to not think of
I won’t say it but I’ll think it. … You dumb cooze. Because she wasn’t listening. It
wasn’t a war story. It was a love story. But you can’t say that. All you can do is tell it
Allowing Curt, Ted, Kiowa, Linda, Norman, the Vietcong soldier, the baby water buffalo, Mary
Anne, “and all the dead soldiers back from the grave, and the many thousands who were later to
Works Cited
O’Brien, Tim. The Things They Carried. New York: Broadway Books, 1990. Print