Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Peltier Generatort
Peltier Generatort
ASKED QUESTIONS
figure 1
figure 2
figure 3
figure 4
figure 10
figure 11
As the heat moves from the hot to the cold side of the pellet,
the charge carriers (i.e., electrons from the dopants) are
carried with the heat. Heat also effects charge carrier
movement in the return path (typically copper wire). Because
the heat movement can carry far more charge carriers in the
semiconductor material than in the circuit’s return path,
however, a significant potential difference (i.e., Seebeck
voltage) is generated. In this example, the Seebeck voltage
would be about 20 mV.
figure 12
figure 13
figure 14
4. Do I have to use a heat sink in my design?
5. Are any special precautions required for the hot side of the
system?
WORKING MODEL
PELTIER PLATE
HOT SIDE COLD SIDE
COPPER PLATES
V
Warmer junction
Colder junction
Figure 7: Use of two dissimilar conductors creates a complete circuit which
allows for continuous current flow. The conductor with the greatest capacity
for charge carrier movement will determine the direction of current flow.
Figure 7: Use of two dissimilar conductors creates a complete circuit which allows
for continuous current flow. The conductor with the greatest capacity for charge
carrier movement will determine the direction of current flow.
V N
flo
heat
flow
Hot Side
Cool Side
Charge
Carriers
(electrons)
Electron Flow
Electron Flow
-
+
Figure 8: Breaking the circuit, allows for the measurement of the Seebeck voltage
which is produced.
Figure 9: Thermocouple using 0° C reference junction.
100° C Measurement
junction
0° C reference
junction (ice bath)
Figure 9: Thermocouple using 0° C reference junction.
V
4.096 mV
Figure 10
Thermoelectric Power Generation Technology FAQ
semiconductor material than in the circuit’s return path,
however, a significant potential difference (i.e., Seebeck
voltage) is generated. In this example, the Seebeck
voltage would be about 20 mV.
In thermoelectric power generation, ‘P’ pellets are also
employed. Figure 11 shows a basic configuration. Note
how the flow of electrons goes in a direction opposite to
that of hole flow.
It is through the use of both N and P type materials
in a single power generation device, that we can truly
optimize the Seebeck effect. As shown in
Figure 12, the N and P pellets are configured
thermally in parallel, but electrically in a series
circuit. Because electrical current (i.e., moving
electrons) flows in a direction opposite to that
of hole flow, the current generating potentials
in the pellets do not oppose one another, but are
series-aiding. Thus, if each pellet developed a
Seebeck voltage of 20 mV, this combination of
an N and P pellet would generate approximately
40 mV rather than zero volts.
Of course, in truly practical TEG’s, many
such P & N couples are employed to bring the
Seebeck voltage up to useful levels. The illustration in Figure 13 shows a three-
couple device (more typically, a
Seebeck module would have 127 couples or more). Note the direction of electrical
current flow in the N/P series
configuration (assuming a load is connected across the Seebeck device).
2. Do TEG’s employ silicon-based semiconductor material?
They can. Tellurex, however, uses bismuth/telluride structures to optimize
performance. While similar dopants
are employed in both semiconductor technologies, the crystalline latices which form
from Bismuth/Telluride,
are far more complex. The same principles of ‘N’ and ‘P’ material apply, though.
V P
flo
heat
flow
Hot Side
Cool Side
Charge
Carriers
(holes)
Electron Flow
Electron Flow
-
+
Figure 11
NP
Hot Side Hot Side
Cool Side
Charge Carrier
Movement
(electrons)
Charge Carrier
Movement
(holes)
+-
Thermal Energy Movement
Figure 12
Thermal
Flow
Hot Side
Cool Side
+-
NPNPNP
Electron Current Electron Current
Electron Current Electron Current
Figure 13
Thermoelectric Power Generation Technology FAQ
3. How is a typical TEG system
configured?
Fundamentally, there are four basic components: a
heat source, a TEG module (i.e., a thermoelectric
generator—also known as a Seebeck device), a
“cold-side” heat sink, and the electrical load. The
system may also include a voltage regulation
circuit, or a fan for the heat sink. The illustration
in Figure 14 shows one example.
In this case we have a burner box with a propane
fuel source. It is shown with the burner box open
on one end, but in reality, it would be enclosed.
The TE module is then sandwiched between the
heat source and the cold-side sink. While this
example shows only a single TEG module, in
reality, several modules might be deployed in
whatever series/parallel electrical arrangement best served the load.
4. Do I have to use a heat sink in my design?
It would be virtually impossible to get an adequate ⊗T without some type of heat
sink. However, you can sometimes
reduce the size requirement for the sink (i.e., fin surface area) if you can find a way
to insure good air flow.
5. Are any special precautions required for the hot side of the system?
Yes. First and foremost, you want to prevent the hot-side temperature of the TE
device from exceeding the
melting temperature of the solder employed to secure the semiconductor pellets to
the copper tabs. It is
recommended that the temperature be kept below 200° C. Toward this end, it is a
good idea to use some type of
“heat spreader” to prevent hot spots at the hot-side module interface. Usually this
means employing a relatively
thick casting or extrusion between the heat source and the module.
On the mechanical side—especially when using multiple devices—you need to find a
means of applying
compression between the hot and cold sides, which will apply even pressure across
the modules and, most
importantly, prevent the hot-side interface from bowing. If there is too great an
expanse between compression
points, the hot side interface can distort to the point where some modules are
crushed or the thermal interface is
compromised.
6. What does the specification THot mean?
This is the temperature at the mounting surface of the module, which comes in
contact with the heat source (i.e.,
the hot side of the system).
7. What does the specification TCOLD mean?
This is the temperature at the mounting surface of the module, which comes in
contact with the cold-side heat
sink.
8. What does “no-load voltage” (VNL) mean?
This is the voltage output of the TEG system when no electrical load is connected.
9. What does “load voltage” (VL) mean?
This is the voltage output of the TEG system when an electrical load is connected.
10. What does “internal resistance” (RInt) mean?
This is the electrical resistance of the TEG module (or module array).
Fuel
Burner Box
Exhaust
Electrical Output
Cold Side
Heat Sink
TE Module
Figure 14
Thermoelectric Power Generation Technology FAQ
11. What does “power conversion efficiency” mean?
It is the ratio of power output to power input, expressed as a percentage. In this case,
power output would be the
wattage dissipated in the electrical load and power input would be the rate of energy
use (e.g., watts, BTU’s/hr)
to create the necessary ⊗T.
12. What does “electrical efficiency” mean?
It is the ratio of electrical power dissipated in the load to the total amount of power
generated (including the
dissipation in the internal resistance).
13. What does “worst case operating point” mean?
Within the range of possible operating circumstances, the worst case will occur at the
point where the generating
system can just meet the expected demands of the electrical load. In most systems,
this will be when: 1) the
generator is at the lowest expected ⊗T, and 2) the load requires the greatest
expected current draw. Some
systems may have a worst case operating point under other unique conditions,
however. The key concept is that
the load requires everything that the generator can muster.
14. What sort of efficiencies typically result from TE power generation?
To put it bluntly, TEG’s are not used for their incredible power conversion efficiency.
When your primary
design goal is maximizing efficiency, you’re plainly going to choose another
technology. Generally, if you’re
getting 5 to 10% between power in and power out on a TEG, you’re doing pretty well.
As for the efficiency of
any specific TEG system . . . well, that depends. The properties of thermoelectric
modules are very temperature
dependent and efficiencies can vary widely depending on the operating parameters
of the system at hand.
Generally speaking, the higher the ⊗T and the closer you get to a point of maximum
power transfer (matching
the generator to your load—more on this to come), the more efficient your system
will be with respect to power
conversion.
15. Why, then, would I want to use a thermoelectric generator (TEG) as opposed
to some other approach?
Thermoelectric power generation is definitely a niche technology. TEG use is most
viable in applications
where waste heat can be converted into usable electric power. In these situations,
the input power is essentially
free—heat that is a by-product of some other necessary process. As long as the
opposite side of the module can
be effectively cooled (usually with a passive heat sink) to create a ⊗T across the TEG,
there is the potential for
extracting DC to power an electrical load.
Another common justification for using TEG’s, is when there is an overriding reason
precluding the use of
other technologies. For example, the remoteness of a use site may make it
impractical for someone to maintain
a gas-powered mechanical generator. As long as a source of fuel is readily available,
a properly-operated
thermoelectric generator can run for a very long period without human attention.
16. What is “maximum power transfer” and
why is it so important in designing TEG
systems?
It’s too bad there’s not a short answer to this question, but
alas. People are so accustomed to working with regulated
power sources these days, that they hardly pay attention
to this very fundamental concept of electronics. With
a regulated power supply, you can connect all kinds of
different loads (within some limits), and the voltage will
stay relatively constant. You can even buy constant current
sources that will keep the current steady despite variations
in load.
TEG’s just don’t work like regulated power supplies. At
any given ⊗T, as the load resistance decreases, so does the
output voltage; as the load resistance increases, the output
Load
INT
R
R
No-load
voltage
TEG
Model
Figure 15
Thermoelectric Power Generation Technology FAQ
voltage will follow suit. There is no inherent output regulation (although it can be
provided with additional
circuitry). Why? Because TEG’s have appreciable “internal resistance”. This means
that as more current is
drawn by the electrical load (e.g., as load resistance decreases), more of the
available power is dissipated within
the TEG; furthermore there is an appreciable voltage drop across this internal
resistance.
To understand the electrical model for a TEG system, imagine the no-load voltage
(i.e., the open-circuit voltage
output of a TEG) applied to a series circuit consisting of the module’s internal
resistance (RINT) and the electrical
load (RLoad). As in any series circuit, the voltages will ‘drop’ in proportion to the
resistances. Thus, if the noload
voltage was 3 VDC, the internal resistance was 3 ∧, and the load was 6 ∧, there would
be a 2 VDC drop
across the load.
So how does “maximum power transfer” fit into all of this? Here’s the deal. For any
electrical circuit, you will
transfer the most power to the load when the resistance of the load equals the
internal resistance of the voltage
source. Note we are not saying that this point of operation will give you the
maximum amount of voltage or
current—that is simply not true—but you will derive the greatest power output at that
point. For example, in the
circuit with the no-load voltage of 3 VDC and 3 Ω of internal resistance, we could use
the following formulas to
determine load voltage, current, and power for various load resistances:
Table 1 shows what would result for a range of load resistance values
between 0.5 and 8 Ω. While the load voltage increases with load resistance
and load current increases as the load resistance decreases, it can be seen
that the maximum amount of power is transferred to the load when the load
resistance equals the internal resistance of the TEG. This is an immutable
principle which can actually be proven as the general case using advanced
mathematics. It can also be demonstrated empirically in the lab. Ironically,
at this operating point, you will dissipate equal amounts of power within
both the load and the internal resistance of the generator. This, no doubt,
seems less than ideal, but if you want to get the maximum power output
from your generator, you can only do so with a matched load.
Okay, so we just match our generator and load, right? Matching loads,
however, can get fairly tricky. It is most easily done when sales quantities
can justify a custom TEG module; then the pellet configuration can be
optimized for the specific application. When employing off-the-shelf
options, on the other hand, the designer is left to arrive at a series/parallel
module combination that can do the best job of load-matching with the
fewest devices. Further complicating matters in many cases, will be the
fact that operating conditions may change over time and your design may
be matched for one set of circumstances but not for another. If the ambient
environment is dynamic and/or the load resistance is variable, therefore, the
engineer must design to the worst case and then manage surplus capacity with a
regulatory circuit.
17. Why is it so important to approximate maximum power transfer in a TEG
system design?
This is where we get back to efficiency—both in terms of power conversion and
economy of design. Let’s look
at the latter criteria first.
RLoad VL IL PL
0.5 0.43 0.86 0.367
1 0.75 0.75 0.563
1.5 1.00 0.67 0.667
2 1.20 0.60 0.720
2.5 1.36 0.55 0.74
3 1.50 0.50 0.750
3.5 1.62 0.46 0.746
4 1.71 0.43 0.735
4.5 1.80 0.40 0.720
5 1.88 0.38 0.703
5.5 1.94 0.35 0.685
6 2.00 0.33 0.667
6.5 2.05 0.32 0.648
7 2.10 0.30 0.630
7.5 2.14 0.29 0.612
8 2.18 0.27 0.595
() ( VDC) VDC
RR
VVR
INT Load
Load
Load NL 2
36
63=
∧+∧
∧=
+
=
( ) ( )( ) LLL
Load
L
L
INT Load
Load
L NL PVI
R
IV
RR
RVV= =
+
=
Thermoelectric Power Generation Technology FAQ
In any product, it is important to keep costs down. Toward that end in TEG design,
you must accept the reality
that when the internal resistance of your generator is properly matched to your load,
you will get the job done
with the fewest TEG devices. If you don’t concern yourself with load matching, on the
other hand, it simply
means that you will use more devices and heat sink capacity to generate the
necessary power.
In those systems which are not based upon waste heat, power conversion efficiency
becomes an issue. Here,
given the natural limits of these devices, you want to be as efficient as possible or
your operating expenses (i.e.,
cost of fuel) will be significantly higher. You can only optimize your efficiency to the
extent that you match
your load and get close to achieving maximum power transfer.
Practically speaking, most TEG system designs will be at least somewhat
mismatched. When you’re dealing
with discrete building blocks (i.e., individual TEG modules), you can only approximate
a given resistance with
series/parallel combinations. Generally, it is better to err on the side of having load
resistance exceed internal
resistance (efficiency is a much more slippery slope when it is the other way around),
but there are certainly
exceptions.
18. Is a TEG’s resistance fairly constant over its operating range?
These devices are significantly temperature-dependent and that presents us with
additional challenges in arriving at
design solutions. For example, a module that has an internal resistance of 5Ω at an
average temperature of 100° C,
might reach 6.1Ω at 150° C. This can result in significant shifts in output voltage,
current, and power as operating
temperatures change. For instance, with such a shift in operating temperatures, if the
load was 5 Ω and the no-load
voltage was held at 8 VDC, given the change in module resistance, the load voltage
would decrease from 4 V to 3.6
V, current would drop from 0.8 to 0.72 amps, and power would go from 3.2 to 2.6
watts (nearly a 19% decrease) at
the higher temperatures. Therefore, if there is any potential for variation in operating
conditions, you have to look at
the range of module resistance values that may result and make sure that you can
accommodate them. This usually
means designing to the worst case—making sure that you get sufficient power when
⊗T is low and current demand
is high—and manage the excess generating capacity at all other operating points.
19. What sort of ⊗T is required to generate power?
Any ⊗T at all will result in power generation. The greater the ⊗T, however, the more
power can be derived—all
other things being equal. Put differently, the greater the ⊗T you achieve, the fewer
TEG devices it will take to
power a given load.
20. How big can these devices get?
Theoretically, there is no limit, but practicality does impose some restrictions. Issues
related to thermal
expansion/contraction—and cost—tend to keep module sizes down to a moderate
size. Typical devices range
up to 40 mm (1.57”) square and about 4 mm thick, but there are exceptions. In the
general case, when extra
generating capacity is required, multiple TEG devices will be employed rather than
fabricating some sort of
gargantuan module.
21. How small can these devices get?
Here again, the theoretical limit goes far beyond what is practical. One issue is
manufacturability. At a certain
point, smaller devices become more expensive to make because they are less
adaptable to automated techniques
and require more hand assembly under demanding conditions.
22. Is there any advantage to be gained from
using multi-stage (i.e., layered) TEG’s?
Not really. This sort of series thermal configuration would actually lower the ⊗T
applied to each stage (halving
it in the case of two layers). This, in turn, would reduce the power output of each
stage. There is really nothing
to be gained with this approach.
23. If I need more voltage than can be provided
by a single device, what are my options?
If the electrical current level from a single device is adequate, but the voltage is
insufficient, you usually place
additional modules electrically in series.
Thermoelectric Power Generation Technology FAQ
24. If I need more current than can be provided
by a single device, what are my options?
If the voltage level from a single device is adequate, but the current level is
insufficient, you usually place
additional modules electrically in parallel.
25. What if I need more voltage and current?
Here there is no one clear answer. This requires circuit analysis on various series,
parallel, and series/parallel
combinations of TEG’s until one is found which best matches the load conditions. Of
course, you need to keep
the temperature dependence of the modules in mind as you explore this.
26. How can I determine the optimum series/parallel
configuration for a given load?
Frankly, this is probably best done by presenting your design needs to a Tellurex
sales representative. At
Tellurex, we employ computer models to help us converge on a solution that will
meet your worst-case
requirements and give you extra capacity at other times. To help you with your
application, we will need to
know:
1) The expected range for THot,
2) The lowest expected ⊗T,
3) The desired voltage level,
4) The greatest expected current draw at that voltage level,
5) Any physical limitations which might impinge on the number of Seebeck devices
employed,
6) Whether or not voltage regulation is important (i.e., whether your load can
withstand fluctuations in voltage
and current), and
7) Whether quantities could justify the use of a custom device.
27. What happens if my system is not in a matched-load condition?
Well, it won’t be the end of the world or anything. In fact, most good designs only
come close to matchedload
operation. Furthermore, if the operating conditions (i.e., temperatures, load
resistances, etc.) are variable,
you will be functioning at a mismatch at least some of the time. It should be clear by
now that, whenever your
system is unmatched, your power-conversion efficiency is going to suffer. Unless
efficient use of input power is
critical, the more important objective will be whether or not you are deriving
adequate power for your load.
28. If I need a steady output voltage, do I need some sort of regulator?
Unless your operating conditions are absolutely constant, you
will need a regulator. The instinctive response in this kind of
situation, is to employ a series regulator. Naturally, according
to Murphy’s Law, that is precisely the wrong thing to do. The
problem with series regulators, is that their input voltage must
be at least 1.5 to 2 V higher than the desired output. This
means that you might have to use additional generator capacity
just to deal with the voltage drop across the regulator. Ideally,
you would like a regulator that would allow you to use every
last bit of available voltage (if it is required).
Fortunately, there is a regulator circuit which can deliver on this frontier—the shunt
regulator. A shunt regulator
uses a power semiconductor component (usually a transistor) placed in parallel with
the load. Here it works
much like the overflow drain on a bathtub—if you fill the tub to the overflow drain, it
begins to siphon off water
to keep the tub from overflowing. With the shunt regulator, if the TEG is producing
power that would normally
take the load voltage beyond the desired operating point, the regulator will begin to
conduct. By drawing
additional current, it can drop more voltage across the internal resistance of the TEG
module.
Shunt
Load Regulator
INT
R
R
No-load
voltage
Figure 16
Thermoelectric Power Generation Technology FAQ 1 0
The shunt regulator can provide two types of regulation—line and load. In providing
line regulation, the shunt
circuit conducts current as necessary to hold the load voltage constant in the face of
changes in no-load voltage.
It can also provide load regulation—that is, altering its conductive properties to
compensate for changes in load
resistance. If the load requires more current, the shunt regulator conducts less; if the
load requires less current,
the shunt regulator conducts more.
There is one “fly in the ointment”, however. The shunt regulator can only provide
regulation as long as it is
drawing current. Once the circuit load resistance draws all of the available current at
the desired voltage, the
regulator can no longer respond to further reductions in either load resistance or no-
load voltage. If you design
your system to this worst case, however, you should not have any problem with
regulation.
It is important to note here, that the use of a regulator—either shunt or series—will
decrease the powerconversion
efficiency of the system (the power dissipated in the regulator is generated output
that is not
delivered to the load). This is simply part of the price of regulation, however.
29. Why not just control the heat source to get a regulated output?
This would be a terrific way to go if it was practical. With this approach, if a generator
was using excessive
energy, you could just cut down on the input power (e.g., fuel flow). The problem is
that this would typically
be done with an electrically-controlled valve. Unfortunately, the power demands of
these valves and the
support circuitry to control them, would consume most (and perhaps all) of the
generator’s potential output. An
electronic regulator is usually more cost-effective.
30. Is there a limit to how many devices I can use in a TEG system?
Theoretically, no, although at a certain point, it can get a little clumsy mechanically.
31. Are there any special considerations which apply to clamping a device?
The biggest challenge is finding an effective way to maintain fairly even compression
across all of the modules
employed. In doing this, you must provide enough compression screws (i.e., the
fasteners which draw the hot
and cold sides toward the module) to assure a good thermal interface, yet avoid any
distortion of the metal
stock (heat sinks, burner boxes, etc.). If the expanse is too great, the metal can
easily bow and compromise the
thermal interface (and mechanical integrity) in the process. Also, when assembling
the generator, it is important
to bring the compression up gradually on these screws so that modules are not
crushed from the collapsed
fulcrum effect {see “Mechanical Clamping Method”, in the Introduction to
Thermoelectrics}.
32. Do I need to be concerned with the rate of temperature change when
powering up my system?
You will certainly enhance the longevity of your system if you ramp it up (or down)
slowly. Very rapid changes
in temperature can cause damage to the module due to differential rates of thermal
expansion and contraction.
While some thermal variation is expected in a TEG system and the devices must
withstand this, it is still prudent
to minimize these dynamics whenever possible.
33. How can I determine what my heat sink needs are?
This is probably best done by using rule of thumb and inferences. Based on the
expected ⊗T, you can make
a guess on the system’s power conversion efficiency in the range of 3-5%. Then take
your worst case (i.e.,
greatest) electrical load in watts and divide it by the estimated efficiency. This will
approximate the number of
watts that must be dissipated in the sink. Next, determine a targeted temperature
difference between the hot side
and cold-side sink and divide it by the total number of watts that will be dissipated in
the sink. For example, if
we suspected an efficiency of 4% in an application delivering 5 W to a load, with a
temperature difference of
100° C between the heat sink and hot-side of the burner box, we could determine the
required heat sink/(fan)
resistance as follows:
Thermal Resistance ( )( ) ( ) ( ) CW
P
T Efficiency
Efficiency
P
T
LL
0.8 /
5
= ⊗ = 100 0.04 = °
= ⊗ 04
Thermoelectric Power Generation Technology FAQ 1
34. Would it be helpful to include a fan on the “cold side”?
With any heat sink, proper air movement will dramatically enhance the performance.
Thus, if you can provide
active ventilation to your cold-side sink, you should be able to improve your ⊗T. The
big question is whether
the improvement in performance will be more than enough to offset the power
demands of the fan. Sometimes
it will be feasible, sometimes not.
35. Do I have to insulate between the hot and cold sides of the system?
If you can find an insulating material which can withstand your highest temperatures,
it will improve the powerconversion
efficiency of the system.
36. How can I measure no-load voltage directly
when the system is connected to an electrical load?
Simply put, you can’t. The only way to measure the no-load voltage, is by
disconnecting the load and
measuring the voltage which results.
37. What happens if I design a system
which provides more electrical power than I need?
If the system always provides surplus power, try decreasing your ⊗T. This can be
done by either decreasing
input power (if possible) or by using a less efficient heat sink on the cold side. On the
other hand, if your power
surplus occurs on an intermittent basis and your load cannot withstand the
variability, you may need to manage
the excess with a shunt regulator.
38. Does Z-Max® offer any advantages over other thermoelectric power
generators?
Yes. With our unique, patented, hybrid metallurgy, Z-Max® devices yield power
outputs which are unsurpassed
in the industry.
39. Are these modules tested before shipment?
All Tellurex TEG’s are subjected to quality testing before shipment.
40. Can I check a TEG with an ohmmeter?
No. The vast majority of ohmmeters apply DC to the resistance being measured. This
will generate a Seebeck
voltage which makes the measurement inaccurate. To measure internal resistance
directly, you must use a meter
which applies a true AC waveform (i.e., one which varies in polarity every half-cycle).
With the continual
polarity reversals in this type of meter, little or no Seebeck voltage will be created
(although some self-heating
may result if you hold it under test for a prolonged period). To get this kind of
operation, you will probably
have to locate a high-quality LCR meter.
41. Can I use an ohmmeter which applies a pulsed DC?
No. This, too, will result in Seebeck voltages which make measurement inaccurate.
The meter must apply a
waveform which reverses polarity every half cycle.
42. How can I order?
Go to www.tellurex.com and click on the ordering page.
43. How can I get more info?
Call 231-947-0110.
1
Short title:- Thermoelectricity
Long Title:- Investigating the performance of a semiconductor, thermoelectric, heat
pump (TEC)
Weights:- 3 if all suggested experiment are done, including the modeling (step 3).
Scientific purpose:- From a series of experiments on a given thermoelectric cooling
(TEC)
device, determine values for the 3 device parameters in the usual physical model for
its steady
state performance. Use the model to predict optimum operating conditions for the
device and
estimate the greatest temperature drop it can provide (with zero heat input).
Heuristic purpose:- 1) To familiarize students with techniques for observing and
modelling the
performance of a thermodynamic system. 2) To observe heat production, heat flow,
and the
Seebeck and Peltier effects, and to understand their relationships with the first and
second laws
of thermodynamics.
_____________________________________________________________________________
Background:-
A TEC (Thermo-Electric Cooler) is an electrically driven, solid-state, heat pump in the
form of a
plate (Figure 1). In use, the input and output sides of the plate usually are thermally
connected to
different parts of the surrounding environment with thick pieces of aluminum metal.
Aluminum
conducts heat so readily that these so called "thermal reservoirs" will have an almost
uniform
temperature.
Figure 1. A semiconductor thermoelectric cooling module (TEC) (left). Internally, it consists of
alternating pairs of metal-semiconductor-metal thermocouple junctions (right). (From
www.peltierinfo.
com)
A TEC is an array of metal-to-semiconductor thermocouple junctions. If one side of
the TEC is at
a different temperature than the other, a potential difference will be observed
between its leads
(called the Seebeck voltage, Vs ). And if a suitable dc electrical current is passed
through the
TEC, the temperature of one side of the plate will drop with respect to the
temperature of the
other side. In steady operation, a TEC can suck heat from a cool environment on the
input side
and discharge heat (a greater amount of heat) to a warmer environment on the other
side.
Such a device is called a "heat pump" because it causes thermal energy to be moved
from a
cooler temperature to a warmer one, rather than the natural case of heat flowing
from higher to
lower temperature. There is, of course a penalty for frustrating nature's normal
habits, and this is
2
a necessary input of electrical power. Heat pumps are just the reverse of heat
engines. In a
classic heat engine, some amount of heat is input at high temperature, and a fraction
of that
amount is output at lower temperature, while the difference between the input
output heat
energies appears as mechanical (or some other kind of) work. In a heat pump or
refrigerator,
work energy is input to the device, which causes an amount of thermal energy to be
taken into
the device at some low temperature and a larger amount (the sum of the input heat
and electrical
energies) to be output at a higher temperature.
The “second law of thermodynamics” states that entropy (the heat energy
transported divided by
the absolute temperature at which it moves) must increase or (at best) remain
constant in the
process. The ideal case (no entropy change) is called a “reversible process”. Normal
heat flow
(heat energy moving from higher to lower temperature) always increases entropy.
Physical basis:-
The Seebeck and Peltier effects that a TEC exploits arise from the free (or partially
free) electrons
that allow charge to move through a conductive solid. The charge carriers also
transport heat
very effectively; this being in addition to whatever heat flows through the crystalline
frame of the
solid by lattice vibrations (called phonons). Especially in situations where different
conductive
media are in contact with one another, couplings arise between heat flow and current
flow, and
temperature difference and potential difference. A temperature difference can
generate a
potential difference (Seebeck effect), and a current flow can generate a heat flow
(Peltier effect),
and vice versa. The two effects are reciprocal; not independent. More information is
provided in a
separate document.
Apparatus:-
Figure 2 is a diagram of the refrigeration device (TEC) and its surroundings. The TEC
is
sandwiched between an aluminum block and an aluminum heat sink. These two
"thermal
reservoirs" (at temperatures Tin and Tout, units K) pass heat into and out of the TEC
through its
surfaces at rates Pin and Pout (positive flow is defined to be the direction from input
reservoir to
output, units J/s = W).
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of how a TEC can be used to cool an object. In our experiment,
heat is supplied electrically to the input reservoir by resistive dissipation and heat is removed
from
the output reservoir by a forced flow of air. (Illustration from www.peltier-info.com.)
The TEC consists of multiple pairs of metal-semiconductor-metal junctions in which
the
semiconductor type is alternated. The thermocouple pairs are connected electrically
in series
and thermally in parallel (Figures 1, 2 and 3).
3
Figure 3 (Right) TEC with one face removed:- bismuth telluride bricks, doped with impurities to
be p or n semiconductors. (Left) copper connection strips and top surface. (Illustration from
www.peltier-info.com).
Although the materials connecting the surfaces of the TEC between the junctions are
p and n
semiconductors, the device contains only metal to semiconductor junctions. Thus, a
TEC does
not exhibit the non-linear voltage versus current characteristic of a semiconductor
diode (which
requires a p-n junction). It acts like a battery (the thermocouple voltage) in series
with a small
ohmic resistance; and a potential difference of only a few volts applied across the
TEC can cause
an ampere level current to flow through it. The device itself is symmetrical; so the
direction of
current flow determines the direction of heat flow from one surface of the TEC to the
other.
Experimental set-up:-
In our experiment ( Figures 4, 5), heat is supplied at a controlled rate to the "input"
thermal
reservoir, by passing an ac electric current through a pair of resistors attached to it
(total
resistance Rh = 2.0 Ω; Pin = IhVh = Ih
2 Rh). The input reservoir is only poorly connected to the air
environment, so the heat flow into the TEC (Pin ) will be closely equal to the amount of
resistive
heating of the reservoir. (Of course, if the input reservoir is at a very different
temperature than
ambient air, it will receive or lose heat at a small rate, but this can be neglected, at
least initially).
The total flow of electrical power into the TEC is Pd = Vd Id where, respectively, Vd and
Id are the
total voltage across the device and the current flowing through it. This power is used
two ways,
as electrical work (Vs Id) done to overcome the TEC’s Seebeck (thermocouple) voltage
Vs, and as
ohmic power dissipation which heats the TEC (Id
2 Rd). The first part drives the Peltier heat pump;
the second part heats the TEC, and is an undesired side effect.
The output thermal reservoir is a fan-cooled, finned, aluminum heat sink which
dissipates Pout into
the air environment. To do this, the heat sink's temperature (Tout) must rise a few
degrees above
the ambient air temperature (T0).
The input reservoir gets (nearly) all its heat from the heating resistors (Rh). Thus Pin =
R h Ih
2 if the
temperatures of the TEC and its thermal reservoirs are not changing. Conservation of
energy
requires that Pout = Pin + Pd.
The temperature at the input and output of the TEC are monitored in the input and
output thermal
reservoirs. Locations of the electrical connection points and the temperature
monitoring points in
the apparatus are shown in Figure 5, along with all necessary circuitry.
4
Figure 5 Connection points on the experiment assembly.
Figure 6 Phenomenological model of TEC behaviour.
5
Phenomenological physical model of a TEC:-
The aim here is to use basic macroscopic physical principles to inter-relate different
aspects of
the TEC's performance. Included in the modelling equations are some unknown
parameters that
depend on the TEC's construction and its materials. If the values of these parameters
can be
estimated by a few experimental measurements, performance in other
circumstances can be
predicted. The standard phenomenological model of a TEC contains only three
elements:- 1) An
ideal Peltier (Carnot) reversible heat pump which is just an ideal thermocouple
working in
reverse, 2) Ohmic resistive heating (in addition to the Peltier effect) that occurs in the
TEC
semiconductor materials when current is passed through it. 3) Normal (non
electronic) heat flow
from the hot output port of the TEC to the cooler input port, such as occurs when the
TEC is
disconnected electrically. Figure 6 shows this schematically, along with the relevant
equations.
Remember that the model applies to steady state operation of the TEC. The TEC (and
especially
the thermal reservoirs attached to it) possess significant heat capacity. When input-
output
conditions are altered, it will take some minutes for the reservoirs and the TEC parts
to heat up or
cool down, and for a new steady state to be established.
Experimental procedures:-
Conceptually, the apparatus allows the TEC to be operated in three ways:-
1) with an approximately fixed current (Id ~ 5 A) supplied from the built in power
supply.
2) not operated, but with terminals open circuited (Id = 0).
3) not driven, but with the TEC terminals short circuited. However, this 3rd state is
hard to
achieve in practice, because a path needs to have very low (milliohm) resistance to
be effectively
a short circuit (zero resistance). The resistance of plug-in leads is often higher than
this. Also, it
may preclude insertion of an ammeter, because the meter's resistance may be too
large. If you
wish to do such an experiment, connections must be made with thick wire firmly
clamped into the
screw terminals of the apparatus, and current measurement must be obtained by
reading (with an
electronic micro-voltmeter) the very low voltage produced across a very low value
resistor often
called a "current shunt" or "current sense resistor" (10 mΩ or 1 mΩ).
Heat can be supplied to the input thermal reservoir at any desired rate by adjusting
the 60 Hz
voltage output from a "Variac" variable transformer which is applied (via a separate
step-down
transformer) to the pair of series connected 1.0 ohm resistors. Power inputs in the
range of about
0 - 20 W are feasible.
When the TEC and its thermal reservoirs are in steady operation, the thermal inertia
of the
system allows turning off the TEC current Id for a few seconds without much
disruption of its
temperature state. Thus, one can record the total Seebeck thermocouple voltage
being generated
in the TEC simply by breaking the current supply circuit for a few seconds and
measuring the
voltage across the TEC carefully.
Suggested experiments:-
1) Passive heat flow experiment (TEC open circuited, heat sink fan on).
For several values of Pin from 0 to about 5 W, measure the steady state
temperatures of the
input and output reservoirs, and the ambient air,. Graph the temperature differences
Tin –Tout and
Tout – T0 as a function of Pin ( = Ph), and try to estimate the thermal conductance Kd of
the TEC
(between the two reservoirs) and Khs between the output heat sink and the ambient
air.
6
2) Cooling experiments, (Active TEC)
2a ) After letting the system cool off after experiment 1, operate the TEC with no
heat input to the
input reservoir for about 15 minutes, while monitoring the voltage across the TEC
and the current
supplied to it, as well as the input and output temperatures. Draw a graph of the
temperatures
and the electrical power input Pd versus time. It will be hard to establish a completely
steady
state, but after a few minutes, changes in state should be slow enough that the
temperatures and
power input Pd can effectively be measured nearly simultaneously.
2b) After about 15 minutes of cooling (in 2a), or once the temperature jump across
the TEC has
reached a few tens of degrees, make a series of observations where a flow of heat is
supplied to
the TEC’s input reservoir. Also, as well as monitoring Pd (Vd with Id on), make
observations of the
TEC’s Seebeck voltage (Vd with Id off) for a few seconds every minute or so.
In steps lasting a few minutes each (so a steady state is approximated) apply
increasing amounts
of power to the resistors on the input reservoir (0 to ~10W). Monitor the reservoir
temperatures,
Pin and Pd (with Id on) and also Vd (with Id = 0), and plot graphs of the reservoir
temperature
differences, Pd and Vd versus Pin.
3 Modelling (use of MatLab or Mathematica is recommended.)
3a) After examining the modelling equations given in Figure 6, select results from 1
and 2b to
estimate values for the model parameters of the apparatus and the TEC.
3b) Use the TEC model to predict the results of 2a (maximum cooling with no heat
input).
3c) Decide what would be the optimum drive current for the device if it is to be
operated (say)
with an output temperature of 35C and an input temperature not exceeding 5 C.
When operated
at this current, what is the maximum rate at which heat can be supplied the input
reservoir.
(without it warming above 5 C)?
3e) What is the lowest input temperature that can achieved with this device (using
the optimum
input current), if absolutely no heat is admitted to the input reservoir?
Possible Additional experiments:-
The model described above does not take account of thermal conductances /
resistances
between the heat sink and the environment, or the input reservoir and the
environment, or in the
TEC between the semiconductor elements and the surface of the TEC. Can you
estimate these
from observational data you can obtain or by looking up propertied of materials in
handbooks and
create a more complete model of the TEC. How would you make a dynamic model
(one that
would predict warm-up /cool-down rates).
References:-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peltier_cooler
good place to start
http://www.ferrotec.com/usa/thermoelectric/ref/3ref2.htm
http://www.peltier-info.com/info.html
and links at bottom of Introduction page
http://www.tf.uni-kiel.de/matwis/amat/elmat_en/kap_2/backbone/r2_3_3.html
(Theory of Seebeck and Peltier effects)
Thermoelectrics
Thermoelectric modules
Thermoelectric materials are of interest for applications as heat pumps and power
generators. The performance of thermoelectric devices is quantified by a figure of merit,
ZT, where Z is a measure of a material's thermoelectric properties and T is the absolute
temperature. A material with a figure of merit of around unity was first reported over four
decades ago, but since then — despite investigation of various approaches — there has
been only modest progress in finding materials with enhanced ZT values at room
temperature. We have observed a ZT ~2.4 in our Bi2Te3/Sb2Te3 superlattice devices.The
enhancement is achieved by controlling the transport of phonons and electrons in the
superlattices — more specifically, phonon-blocking, electron-transmitting superlattices.
University of Birmingham
Course 3 Laboratory
ABSTRACT
Spacecraft in Earth orbit are in a hostile thermal environment,
alternately baking in the Sunlit half of the orbit and then
freezing in the Earth’s shadow. Many detectors such as CCD’s,
need to be cooled to low temperatures, to reduce dark counts.
This experiment investigates the performance of Peltier heat
pumps, and methods of heat dissipation into space by cold
fingers and passive thermal radiators.
Theory
The thermal conductivity, k is defined as the rate at which heat is conducted through a
material and is expressed in units of W m-1 K-1
Q = k A (T1 –T2) / d
Copper 390
Aluminium 237
Stainless Steel 16
Glass 0.93
Water 0.6
Nylon 0.25
Expanded polystyrene 0.03
Air 0.025
The specific heat of a material is the amount of heat required to raise the temperature of
1 kg of the material by 1 Kelvin and has units J kg-1 K-1
Water 4180
Aluminium 889.7
Iron 449
Where A is the surface area of the black body, σ is the Stefan’s constant and T is the
absolute temperature.
For a body which is not black then we have to take into account the emissivity ε of the
surface, so we obtain:
P =A ε σ T4
In the space environment, these are the only methods of heat transfer that we need to
consider, as there can be no convection in the vacuum of space. However in the
laboratory we may also need to consider convection.
Transfer of Heat by Convection
The transfer of heat by convection obeys Newton’s Law of Cooling, which states that the
rate of transfer of heat is proportional to the excess temperature ΔT. The amount of heat
transferred Q is given by
Q=h A ΔT
The Peltier device is a series of P-N junctions through which and electric current is
passed. One side of the junction becomes hot and the other cold. The first part of this
laboratory experiment is for you to understand the physics of a Peltier device and to write
a paragraph in your laboratory book, explaining the detailed physics of how such a device
operates. This information can be obtained from a textbook or from the WWW, but must
be written in your own words.
The diagram below shows a schematic heat engine, which can represent the Peltier
device.
Ex
Experimental Equipment
A Peltier device, RS Components type 618-730 is attached by thermal glue to one end of
a cold finger. At the other end of the cold finger is a copper heat sink, cooled by water
(RS type169-4404). The cold finger is made of aluminium alloy and is 40.0mm in
diameter. A series of ‘J-type’ thermocouples is inserted along the cold finger and on the
hot and cold sides of the Peltier device, as well as in the water inlet and exit tubes. The
thermocouples are at 30.0mm spacing along the cold finger.
Cold Finger
Water in
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5
Water out
You are provided with a DC Power supply to operate the Peltier Heat Pump. The
maximum temperature of the hot junction must not exceed 70C, nor must the DC current
exceed a maximum of 8.0A. Operation outside these values will destroy the device.
Whenever the Peltier device is powered, the cold finger must be cooled by a flow of
water from a constant head apparatus. This device will produce a constant flow of water
through the heat sink. The actual flow can be adjusted by changing the heights of the inlet
and exit pipes. A flow of between 50ml and 150ml per minute should be sufficient.
A Pico Technology 8 channel thermocouple data logger connected to a PC is used to
measure and record temperatures in the experiment. Manuals for the data logger and
specification sheets for the Peltier device can be found in Appendix 1 of this experiment
manual.
Determine the optimum performance of the Peltier heat pump, by measuring the
temperatures of the hot and cold junctions as a function of the input electrical power.
In any thermal experiment it is essential that the whole system be in thermal equilibrium,
otherwise erroneous results will be obtained. This will depend on the thermal time
constant of the system. It would be useful, therefore to estimate the thermal time
constant, before making any measurements. How did your estimate of the thermal time
constant compare with the time it actually took for thermal equilibrium to be established?
That is when there is no significant change in any of the thermocouple temperatures.
Plot a graph of cold junction temperature against the voltage and determine the optimum
voltage. Record the water flow and the temperature difference in the water.
The efficiency of the heat pump is the amount of heat, QC, pumped from the cold to the
hot junction by the electrical power (I*V)
This is often called the coefficient of performance, COP = QC / (I*V). The following
graph shows how COP is a function of I / IMAX and ΔT /Δ T MAX
I / I MAX
You have the values of I MAX and Δ T MAX from the data sheets, so you should be able to
determine the efficiency (COP) of the device, and knowing the electrical power be able to
estimate the heat pumped QC . This will then allow you to calculate the total heat pumped
into the cold finger, which will be useful in the next part of the experiment.
The heat flow Q down the cold finger is given by the expression
Q = k A (T1 –T2) / d
Where k is the thermal conductivity, A is the area of cross section of the cold finger and
(T1 –T2) / d is the temperature gradient along the cold finger.
Set up the experiment so that the Peltier hot junction is at about 50C and the rate of water
cooling is about 100ml per minute. Allow the experiment to come into thermal
equilibrium and then measure the temperature along the cold finger with the
thermocouples T1 to T5 to determine the temperature gradient. Plot a graph of the
temperature along the cold finger using a spreadsheet.
How linear is the gradient? What can this tell you ?
You can then determine the amount of heat, Q, flowing down the cold finger by the
temperature increase of the water. Alternatively you can use a measurement of the
electrical power and the COP to determine the heat flow down the cold finger.
Estimate the thermal conductivity k of the cold finger and consider the errors in the value
you obtain. The alloy of the cold finger is aluminium type BS6082. Compare the value
you have obtained for k with published values.
Project Section
You are provided with a second cold finger made of the same material and with an
identical Peltier heat pump in the same insulated container. Instead of having a water-
cooled heat sink, the cold finger has a mounting flange to attach passive radiators.
Engineering drawings of the cold fingers and radiators can be found in Appendix II.
In space experiments, the heat produced by a Peltier heat pump, used to cool a detector, is
radiated into deep space by a passive radiator. This is often coated with a material of high
emissivity ε and is shielded from the Sun.
Investigate the performance of the two passive radiators, which have been provided.
You are provided with a supply of thermocouples and data logger.
What is the lowest detector temperature possible with each of the radiators?
How does convection affect the performance of the radiators? Consider repeating your
experiments in a vacuum chamber if this is available.
Investigate how the surface finish and coating affects the emissivity of the passive
radiators and therefore their performance.
Look at the actual designs of passive radiators in spacecraft and consider making and
testing a new radiator on the cold finger.
How might both of the cold fingers be improved to improve their performance in a
laboratory environment?
A CCD detector and cold finger are available, which you can interface to the Peltier
device with the passive radiator. Investigate the performance of the CCD, when mounted
on the passive radiator.
Appendices