Tomorrow Together Public Open House Boards

Welcome!
tomorrow together
Please walk through the stations
to learn more about the different
plan chapters
Scan this QR code to learn more about

the process and view/comment
on the draft at
tomorrow together stations
Station 1 Station 2 Station 3 Station 4 Station 5

Welcome + Information Existing Conditions Public Engagement Review Vision + Goals Mapping
The Welcome + Information Boards The Existing Conditions Board The Public Input Review summarizes The Vision + Goals Boards feature The Mapping Boards showcase a
provide introductory data for the provides a general base map, a the feedback received via the tomorrow together vision series of conditions and opportunities
tomorrow together comprehensive brief overview of the 2019 American stakeholder interviews, steering statement and the goals tied to each in Mission. The Existing Land Use
plan. The Welcome Board features Community Survey Census Data committee and general public. guiding principle. A vision statement Map illustrates the current land use
a QR code to access the project for Mission, an Existing Land Use Information is categorized from identifies the overriding aspirations parcels in Mission. The Proposed
website and provide feedback map and land use breakdowns, the post card exercise and project for the community and is used Future Land Use conveys the ideal
on the draft comprehensive plan environmental maps that detail website. The project website included as a criteria for decision-making future land uses envisioned for
document. The Information Boards floodplain, slope, tree cover, and trail activities such as a general survey, and goals framework. The six (6) Mission. The Strategic Opportunities
detail what a comprehensive plan locations, and a housing snapshot of desired amenities survey,priority guiding principles are broken down Map visualizes a set of place-specific
is, where to use the document, the Mission today. budget tool, visual preference, and to showcase the goals identified in recommendations that are referred
tomorrow together planning process, interactive mapping. order to further the guiding principle. to and built upon throughout the
the comprehensive plan document entire plan. Lastly, the Proposed
layout, and the overall project Future Land Use Map includes
schedule. Proposed Land Use Definitions to
better understand the land use
categories for Mission.
what is a comprehensive plan? when to use this document
Comprehensive Plans - are guiding documents for growth. They are designed to
assist communities in decision-making on activities and subject areas that affect
A. Re-Zonings B. Evolving Document
local government. They cover a wide set of topics ranging from land use, to parks, Comprehensive plans should be While comprehensive plans are
to natural resources, or infrastructure. The Tomorrow Together Comprehensive regularly referenced by the city thorough, they should not sit on shelf
Plan describes a vision for the future in Mission and identifies an implementation when making decisions about or remain stagnant. Comprehensive
strategy for the community to reach a desired community vision. The Tomorrow development proposals, rezonings, plans should be regularly referenced
Together Comprehensive Plan addresses the needs of Mission through the year code updates, capital improvement and updated when necessary to
2040 and beyond. Goals and action items have been identified that will help the planning and budgeting, and policy reflect changing conditions. Mission
city navigate decision-making for the next twenty years. formation. The Tomorrow Together should perform an annual review of
plan identifies goals, strategies and the entire plan to identify changed
action items to help implement the conditions or accomplished action
vision of the community. items. These efforts will help ensure
the community vision is being
implemented.
C. Informational Tool D. Marketing Material

Comprehensive plans are an The Tomorrow Together
inventory of the existing conditions Comprehensive Plan can be used
of a community that can act as an by the city as a marketing material
information management tool for to highlight what is important to
a city. Interested residents, elected the city as well as future plans and
officials or city staff can reference priorities. This can help to attract new
this plan to help guide or understand residents, development or business
decisions around policies and owners.
programs.
tomorrow together planning process
E. Engagement Tool F. Decision Making
EXISTING CONDITIONS The process for creating a Comprehensive plans are an
Where is Mission today? new comprehensive plan is an inventory of the existing conditions
• Demographics- profile of the community today and estimates of expected growth opportunity for residents and of a community that can act as an
• Natural Resources Inventory- inventory of areas that should be protected and stakeholders to directly engage information management tool for
preserved in goal setting for a community. It a city. Interested residents, elected
• Parks & Recreation Review & Analysis- review of how well the parks serve Mission provides an opportunity for a city to officials or city staff can reference
today and how they can improve gain feedback from residents and this plan to help guide or understand
local business owners on a wide set decisions around policies and
• Housing Analysis - understanding of housing conditions / characteristics today
and how they can improve
of topics. The engagement exercises programs.
can help to identify what aspects of
• Community Character Overview - what makes Mission unique and how we the community help best define the
enhance it
community’s character, strengths
• Land Use Analysis - where are different land uses today and where should they be and weaknesses.
in the future as Mission develops
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT
Where does Mission want to be in the future?
• Public Workshop - held in October 2020 with multiple public engagement
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
exercises available for participants
• Community Surveys - engaging the public via surveys to better understand
opportunities and challenges
• Stakeholder Interviews - conducted stakeholder and group interviews to hear
about different issues in Mission in one-on-one meetings
• Comprehensive Plan Advisory Committee - group of thirteen community leaders
that helped guide the process and provide input over the course of nine meetings
• Public Open House - this event tonight to get feedback about progress to date
and gather initial feedback
• Project Website - project website with information about the plan and
engagement events
IMPLEMENTATION
How does Mission get there?
• Guiding Principles - overarching ideas guide the plan forward
• Goals - objectives or aims which may be broad or specific
• Action Items - specific steps and activities the City should take
• Matrix - each goal and action item will be put into a matrix and assigned a priority
level, time frame and entity responsible for implementation
tomorrow together project schedule

COMMUNITY PROFILE Base Map
LEGEND
Mission City Limits
0 0.5 1.0 miles N
north
GROWTH IN MISSION
Since the 1960s, the Population Change 1960-2019 Population Change 2010-2019
City of Mission has
experienced steady A closer look at population from 2010-
9,523 2019 illustrates greater fluctuation in
growth. In recent years,
the population of 9,523 9,490 residents. There was a slight decline
9,484 in residents from 2010 to 2012, as well
Mission has hovered just
below 10,000 residents. as from 2016 to 2018. Since 2018, the
The land-locked population has steadily increased.
nature of Mission’s city
boundaries indicate that 9,437
the population will likely 4,626
9,414
remain around 10,000
residents.
HOUSEHOLDS IN MISSION HOUSEHOLDS INCOMES

As of 2019, Mission has Household Sizes (2019) Household Incomes in Mission (2019)
an estimated 4,730 The estimated median
occupied households. Of 6.9%
household income in Mission
those, 2,209 were owner- 15.1% is $61,144. Generally, Mission’s
occupied and 2,521 were household income levels are
17.0%
renter-occupied. The higher than that of Johnson
average total household 21.4%
County and the Kansas City
size for the City of Mission 16.2% Metro in the $35,000-$99,999
is 2.01 persons. 11.1% income brackets. The line
2.8% graph below shows Mission
Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied has significantly fewer
2.5% households in the highest
Households Households
2.22 persons 1.82 persons 3.4% income brackets and more
1.6% in the moderate incomes
Source: U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-Year Estimates
compared to Johnson County,
2.0%
the region, and the United
AGE BY SEX States.
In 2019, the median age for Mission Age Profile (2019) HOUSEHOLD COMPARISON (2019)
residents was estimated to be 34.9. This
is younger than the median age for Median Age Mission
Overland
Shawnee Merriam
Park
residents of Johnson County, which has a 34.9
Roeland Johnson KC Kansas
median age of 37.6. The age pyramid on Park County Metro
the right shows the estimated percentage
of Mission’s population (divided by male
and female) by age. A comparison to
Johnson County’s age breakdown is
also shown in a black dashed line. These
estimates indicate Mission has a larger
percentage of younger people than
Johnson County.
Male
Female
Johnson County
Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2019 ACS 5-Year Estimates

COMMUNITY PROFILE Existing Land Use
Under Development
* LEGEND
Mission City Limits
Parcel
Low-Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
High Density Residential
Commercial
Office
City/Public/ Semi-Public
Open Space/Undeveloped
Parks and Recreation

Light Industrial/ Industrial
0 0.25 0.5 miles N
north
EXISTING LAND USE

The three dominant land uses Land Use Composition
in Mission today, include Low-
Density Residential, High-Density
Residential, and Commercial.
Low-Density Residential land
uses primarily includes single-
family homes and some duplexes.
High-Density Residential land use
categories include apartments and
condo typologies. Commercial land
uses include sales and services,
hotels/motels, and restaurants.
These three dominant land uses
are not uncommon in towns of
Mission’s size and location.
RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL, OFFICE, & INDUSTRIAL PARKS & OPEN SPACE/ UNDEVELOPED LAND
Mission City Limits

Mission City Limits Mission City Limits Public/ Semi-Public
Single-Family Residential Commercial Open Space/Undeveloped
Medium Density Residential Office Parks and Recreation

High Density Residential Industrial
Residential land includes Low-, Medium-, and High-Density Commercial and Office land uses are designed for community Parks & Recreation/Open Space land uses are those areas set
developments. Low-Density Residential include single-family and neighborhood-serving retail, office, entertainment, and aside for public, private, and semi-private recreational land such
homes with lot sizes ranging from 1 to 5 dwelling units per acre. commercial areas. These commercial uses are intended to serve as parks, trails, golf courses, greenways, and recreation fields.
Medium-Density Residential includes townhomes, group homes, the entire community as well as attract users from outside the Ownership may be private but is often public and available for use
and duplexes. High-Density Residential includes apartments, city. Industrial land uses include light and general industrial by all residents and visitors.
condominiums, and senior or assisted living developments. developments such as manufacturing and parts assembly,
warehousing, and distribution.
COMMUNITY PROFILE Environmental
Floodplain is generally found in low-lying areas near streams that are periodically inundated with water due to storms. The 100-year floodplain includes areas with a 1%
FLOODPLAIN chance of flooding every year. The 500-year floodplain includes areas with a 0.2% chance of flooding every year.
Mission City Limits
100-Year Floodplain
500-Year Floodplain
Areas with steep slopes are environmental features sensitive to development and erosion. When improperly maintained, slope can become hazardous. While slopes can
often provide beauty to an area, if they begin to erode, they can become a concern. The areas in orange and red have steeper slopes.
SLOPE
Mission City Limits
Higher Slope
Lower Slope
COMMUNITY PROFILE Environmental
TREECOVER
Mission City Limits
Treecover
TRAIL NETWORK
Mission City Limits

Bike Lane
Shared Use Path
Pedestrian Hike Trail
Marked Bike Route
Marked Shared Road
COMMUNITY PROFILE Housing
EXISTING HOUSING
The dominant housing type in Mission is single-family detached homes shown in yellow below. There are several apartment
buildings (shown in brown) and a few medium-density type housing in orange (townhome, duplex, group homes).
Monthly Costs for Renters (2019)

4 ,73 0
OCCUPIED
HOUSING
UNITS u nits
$850
$961
$179,700
MEDIAN
HOME
VALUE* $1,109
Data from 2018 ACS 5-year Estimates $1,182
$1,164
$1,008
$945
$984
The bar graph above depicts esimated median gross rent for Mission to be $984
per month. Comparatively, Mission’s median rent is lower than that of the KC
Metro, County, and neighboring cities of Roeland Park and Overland Park. About
77% of renters in Mission pay between $800 to $1,499 per month in rent. There
are few opportunities to find rentals below $500 and above $1,500 per month.
Medium-Density Residential
High-Density Residential
53.3% renter-occupied
Median Gross Rent (2019): $984
Median Monthly Housing Costs (2019): $1,205 Overland

Mission Park Shawnee Merriam
46.7% Roeland Johnson KC

Park County Metro Kansas
Data from 2019 ACS 5-year Estimates owner-occupied
YEAR BUILT PARCEL VALUE HOME STYLE
The map above details the The Parcel Value Map The Home Style map
year built distribution for Mission shows the total valuation of
Mission shows the home style for Mission
Mission single-family homes. residential parcels in Mission. single-family homes in
Most of Mission’s homes were Year Built Homes south of Martway Total Value Mission. The dominant Home Style
built during 1948 and 1968. Street are typically higher home styles are ranch and
Before 1932 < $197.4k Bi-level
value than the homes found conventional style. Ranch
in north and central Mission. style homes are typically a
1932 to 1947 $197.4k - $253.5k Bungalow
long, thin home with wide
open layouts. Conventional
1948 to 1968 $253.5k - $329.7k style homes are those Conventional
that follow more historical
1969 to 1995 $329.7k - $437.5k > appearances with formally Modern
defined spaces. These
1996 to 2019 $437.5k differ from contemporary Old Style
homes that have open floor
plans and non-traditional Ranch
characteristics.
Split-Level
public input review
An extensive period of public input was conducted to gather as much information, opinions and
consensus on the issues that matter most to Mission residents. This board presents a summary of the
public input received, both in person and virtual, throughout the process and does not necessarily
reflect the views of the City of Mission.
VISIONING EXERCISES
At the very beginning of the public input process, a series of visioning questions were asked to
the project steering committee and the general public to get a sense of what this
comprehensive plan needs to address.
If this new plan could only What do you think the biggest What is your favorite thing Do you think there are negative
accomplish one thing, what challenge in creating a plan in about living in Mission? perceptions about Mission this
would it be? Mission will be? plan should seek to address?
• Keep Mission’s infrastructure strongly intact • Slow down traffic • Convenience of location within the metro and • Combat cynicism amongst residents by
and up to date • Overcoming the perception that Mission is having a variety of services nearby in Mission touting real progress and tangible outcomes
• Affordable housing/ density only for starter homes/families or older people • The community • Too many fast food places and hair salons
• Walkability / Bikeability • Addressing “affordability” and what that term • Small town feel with big city amenities • Perceptions of Johnson county as full of
• Climate action and resilience means to the community • Walkability to Johnson Drive / community snobby, rich, white people
• Come up with an actionable plan to increase • Getting buy-in from legacy residents character / affordability • Can’t complete projects
diversity • Prioritization of limited resources • Easy access to airport, Plaza and downtown • Not as hip as some of the other JoCo suburbs
• Promote new development that fits within • NIMBYs and “I don’t want to pay for that” KCMO • Tough to get through town so they just
the identity • Leveraging diverse perspectives and peoples • Diversity of businesses, housing options, and stay on SMPkwy, not good places to dine or
• Connect residents of all ages and abilities to • Funding major projects residents be entertained, so keep going to Plaza or
important services and with one another • Agreeing which topics are most important to • Doesn’t feel like other Johnson County Crossroads
• Draw from other areas of Johnson County to everyone suburbs. Has character and unique features • I’m not sure a lot of people know how
spend their money in Mission • Infrastructure of old streets, old sewers and • Knowing neighbors and business owners and entertaining the city is
• Safe streets and living environment power lines and tough to maneuver through community members • Mission is not dead. Don’t overlook us
• Help Mission prioritize projects town • Socioeconomic mix - refreshing in JoCo! • Lack of diversity
POST CARD EXERCISE

Pretend post cards were distributed that challenged participants to think about Mission in the
year 2040 and why they would want a friend or loved one to visit them. Here is a sampling of
some of the responses received.
KEY STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS

Members of the planning team met one-on-one with different residents of Mission that
represented a wide cross section of the community. Below are the major themes that came
from those conversations.
TRANSPORTATION AND REPUTATION AND CITY ADMINISTRATION AND

GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT HOUSING
INFRASTRUCTURE CHARACTER SERVICES
STRENGTHS STRENGTHS STRENGTHS STRENGTHS STRENGTHS

• Increase in density, mixed-use • Walkability along Johnson Drive • Housing is a strength in Mission • “All roads lead to Mission” • City is focusing on what they can
developments and walkability • Infrastructural / aesthetic • Smart to focus on senior living • Residents tend to live here a long do like public works, parks, etc.
- Keep encouraging this upgrades to Johnson Drive made and multi-family time • The market, community center
a big difference • Diversifying housing is important • Mission has a cowboy attitude - and programs / events are all
• Overall, infrastructure in Mission • Existing homes rehabilitations do what they want good
CHALLENGES is good and updates are good - • Diversity of personalities
• Sidewalks and cross walks are in encourage this • Mission’s location within the
• Poor quality of development
good shape • Eclectic housing stock is an asset metro is a major asset
along Johnson Drive - fast food CHALLENGES
• Johnson Drive is the centerpiece • Retail space has always been
• Long term viability of retail along
of Mission - provides image and affordable
Johnson Drive in the age of • Don’t try to control everything
reputation to citizens, travelers, • Amenities of a larger city
COVID and online retailers CHALLENGES • This plan shouldn’t start from the
visitors • Good parks and recreation,
• Not enough parking beginning - don’t reinvent the
• Bike lanes on Lamar are nice - public works
• Infill projects are challenging • Need age-in-place housing wheel
need more of this • Downtown is an asset for the
• Effect of empty storefronts on options • Public meetings tend to bring
surrounding businesses • Perception that Mission isn’t community - provides identity out dominant voices - make sure
• West Gateway project friendly towards renters / multi- • Mission has a history of setting we listen to everyone
CHALLENGES good goals and getting them
• Form based code can be family
problematic - but important to • Traffic volumes are a concern - • Not a lot of homeowner done
have clear vision and guidelines removing lanes on Johnson Drive organizations • Neighborhoods are improving
for development could be challenging? • Code enforcement is always an and are more diverse OPPORTUNITIES
• Vertical mixed-use can be • Crossing Johnson Drive as a issue • Strong quality of life
challenging to make the • Hometown feel • Build on momentum of past
pedestrian is not as safe as it
numbers work • Character and charm of Johnson administrations
could be
• “Red carpet” is not displayed for Drive - “face” of the community • City should use tools like CID/
• Aging residents - need to provide OPPORTUNITIES
developers • Diverse restaurants TIF to encourage responsible
services they can afford - Easy
• Finding the right balance for • School district has a good development
Ride • Look at infill opportunities
development in Mission relationship with the city • Council of NE Johnson County
• Mission has a great core of - family co-ops, accessory
Mayors can be helpful
a downtown - but Johnson buildings, granny flats
• Some consolidations of
OPPORTUNITIES Drive still feels like a suburban • Important to keep sliding-scale
services might help (6 police
trafficway - how to improve? assistance programs CHALLENGES
departments in NE Johnson
• Keep focusing on Downtown • Find ways to keep older housing
• Don’t “sanitize” too much - needs County)
• Businesses benefit from competitive
OPPORTUNITIES to stay authentic • Don’t do anything that will keep
pedestrian activity • Retain people who live here so
• Retaining Mission’s family feel Mission from reaching its full
• Develop business improvement they trade-up in the market
• Bring Metcalf Avenue down • Home prices are too high potential
plan - maintenance of businesses • Renting by choice is big right
• City should actively reach out to to grade at Johnson Drive - now • Would like to see more kids
developers interested in Mission enhance the West Gateway area • Embrace empty nesters who around
• Reinstate facade improvement • Need more improvements along moved away and now are • Developing in Mission is difficult -
program Johnson Drive (landscaping, coming back not responsive - no formality
• Encourage experiential retail small parks) • Offer classes / tool-sharing to • Stay ahead of trends
• Look at flexible ways to regulate • Transit Center is not used help homeowners • Don’t lose post office
mixed-use projects enough - encourage multi-modal
• Retail needs to be innovative transportation services
- Convenient curb-side pick-up • Explore reducing travel lanes
- Expand parking in the rear of where possible
buildings • Mission needs to continue to
invest in infrastructure and
quality of life
public input review
GENERAL SURVEY
As part of the interactive engagement website, a general survey was administered to gauge
how the public feels about Mission today, what they see happening in the future and what they
thought were challenges and opportunities for the city.
What one word would you to describe Mission? How would you rate the current quality of life in Over time,do you expect the quality of life in
Mission? Mission to...
Very low 0%
Low 1.8%
Decrease 3.6%
Somewhere between
19.3% Stay the same 20.7%
high and low
High 59.6% Improve 68.5%
Very high 18.4% Not sure 7.2%
Not sure 0.9% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
Please describe why you currently live / conduct If you don’t use public transit today, what would Which of the following statements regarding housing
business in Mission. be needed to make you start using it? choice and diversity do you agree with most?
Nothing 43 “I am living in my dream home” 29.6%
“My house fits my needs right now, but

24.0%
someday in thefuture may be inadequate”
Frequency of Service 43
“I am looking to invest in my home
18.4%
sometime in the near future”
Stop Locations 42 “I am living in an apartment now, but

want to move into a home someday” 9.6%
Reduced Fares 5 “I like my house but its not big enough” 9.6%
“I would like to stay in my home in Mission, but will likely

6.4%
move to a nearby community because of better options”
I Use Public Transit 3
“I am living in an apartment now and
2.4%
I want to continue living in an apartment”
0 10 20 30 40 50
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%
number of responses
DESIRED AMENITIES SURVEY

A second survey on the interactive engagement website asked participants to indicate what
factors into a high quality of life in Mission and what amenities, services and types of
development would help increase that quality even more.
Which type of park / open space amenities are What would help you improve your health and What amenities / services / commercial activity, if
currently missing or inadequate in Mission? well-being? any, do you regularly leave Mission for?
Walking / Biking Trails 58 Enhancements to Parks 60
Dog Park 53 Walkability Enhancements 59

(Tree, Benches, Etc.)
Destination Athletic Facilities
34 More Sidewalks 51
(Bocce Ball, Horseshoes, Pickle Ball, etc.)
Food Truck Area 29

Better Access to Healthy Food 40
Outdoor Fitness Equipment 25

Fewer Fast Food Restaurants 30
Park Shelters 23
More Bicycle Facilities 27
Athletic Fields / Courts 22

Fewer Drive-Thrus 20
Picnic Areas 18
Improved Transit 14
Playgrounds 13
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
number of responses
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
number of responses
Priority items by total votes

PRIORITY BUDGET TOOL
Priority Item Total Votes
Visitors to the public engagement website were asked to budget various improvements to
infrastructure, public facility improvements and programs as a way to prioritize community Residential Streets 58
initiatives. The results are below. Park Improvements 53
Community Events 42
Investment categories and their associated costs Streetscape Improvements 42

Major Streets 36
What should Mission Fund? Neighborhood Preservation 36
Budget: $1,000,000
Trail Expansion 36
Recreation Programs 35
Residential $125,000 Trail $300,000 Sidewalks, Bike $250,000 Sidewalks, Bike Lanes, Trails, & Transit 15
Streets $ Fund Expansion $ Fund Lanes, Trails & Stops
Transit Stops $ Fund
Priority items by total allocated funding

Major $250,000 $50,000
Recreation
Streets
Priority Item Total Funding
$ Fund Programs $ Fund
Trail Expansion $11,100,000
Park Improvements $10,600,000
Park $200,000 Community $25,000
Improvements $ Fund Events $ Fund
Major Streets $9,000,000
Streetscape Improvements $8,400,000
$150,000 $300,000
Residential Streets $7,250,000
Neighborhood Streetscape
Preservation $ Fund Improvements $ Fund Sidewalks, Bike Lanes, Trails, & Transit $7,250,000
Stops
Neighborhood Preservation $5,400,000
Recreation Programs $1,750,000
Community Events $1,050,000
Remodeled Home* Detached ADU ** New Medium Home* New Medium Home* Garage ADU**
Most Preferred Neutral
public input review

INTERACTIVE WEBSITE INTERACTIVE WEBSITE
VISUAL PREFERENCE EXERCISE VISUAL PREFERENCE EXERCISE
INFILL RESIDENTIAL INFILL RESIDENTIAL
VISUAL PREFERENCING New Narrow Home* Modern Home* Micro Home* New Medium Home* New Large Home***
Neutral Preferred Less

Participants were asked to place view different categories of images and select their preferred
options based on beneficial the element depicted would be for the community of Mission. The * Single-Family Detached Home
** ADU = Accessory Dwelling Unit
INTERACTIVE WEBSITE
*** Consolidated Lot
results of this activity can be found below.
VISUAL PREFERENCE EXERCISE
Remodeled Home* Detached ADU ** New Medium Home* New Medium Home* Garage ADU**
Remodeled Home* Detached ADU ** INTERACTIVE
New Medium Home* WEBSITE
New Medium Home* Garage ADU**
INFILL RESIDENTIAL
INFILL RESIDENTIAL
Most Preferred Most PreferredNeutral VISUAL PREFERENCE
Basement ADU** Attached ADU**
EXERCISE Neutral
Table 4 Residential,
- Infill Residential Image Votes
Visual preference exercises were
Least completed for six categories: Multi-Family
Preferred Signage, Infill Residential,
Park Amenities, Streetscape Enhancements, and Placemaking Elements. The results are summarized below.
Infill Residential Comment Type Votes
MULTI-FAMILY
The most RESIDENTIAL
preferred Infill Residential option was the Remodeled Remodeled Home* 48
Single-Family Home, which received a total of 48 votes. The next
two options with a higher number of votes were the Detached Detached ADU** 35
Accessory Dwelling Unit or ADU (35 votes) and the New Medium New Medium Home* 31
Sized Single-Family Home with a Setback Garage (31 votes). Infill
residential options with between 20 and 25 votes each included New Medium Home* 2 25
INTERACTIVE WEBSITE INTERACTIVE WEBSITE

New Medium Single-Family Homes with Detached Garage, Garage
Remodeled Home* Detached ADUHome*
New Narrow ** New Medium
Modern Home*
Home* New Medium
Micro Home*Home* Garage ADU** Home*
New Medium NewNarrow
New Large Home***
Home* Modern Home* Micro Home* New Medium Home* Garage ADU**
New Large Home*** 25
Accessory Dwelling Unit, the New Narrow Home and the Modern
Garage ADU**
and Micro Home
High-Rise options. The Townhouse
Apartment least preferred options were theApartment
Mid-Rise New NewRowhouse
Narrow Home* Duplex 23
Most
Most Preferred
Preferred Neutral NeutralPreferred Less
Neutral VISUAL PREFERENCE EXERCISE VISUAL PREFERENCE EXERCISE
Neutral Large Home on a consolidated lot and the basement and attached Preferred Less
Mostdwelling
accessory Preferredunits. Modern Home* 20 Neutral
Visual preference exercises were completed for six categories: Multi-Family Residential, Signage,Visual
Infill Residential,
preference exercises were completed for six categories: Multi-Family Residential, Signage, Infill Residential,
Micro Home* 20
Park Amenities, Streetscape Enhancements, and Placemaking Elements.
* Single-Family The results are summarized
Detached Home below.
These results
* indicate
Single-Familythat small
Detached to medium-sized
Home homes
Park Amenities, Streetscape Enhancements, and Placemaking Elements. The results are summarized below. are most
desired**
in ADU
Mission. There also
= Accessory appears
Dwelling to be support for certain types
Unit INTERACTIVE WEBSITE
New Medium Home* 17
MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL *** Consolidated Lot MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL of accessory dwelling units
*** Consolidated Lot (detached and over a detached garage).
VISUAL
NewPREFERENCE
Large Home*** EXERCISE
15
- Preference seems to be for remodeling / rehabilitating existingPARKBasement

AMENITIESADU** 15
family-homes Attached ADU** 13
INTERACTIVE WEBSITE
Fourplex Townouse Mid-Rise Apartment Rowhouse Duplex
New Narrow Home* Modern Home* Micro Home* New Medium Home* New Large Home*** - Accessory dwelling units as detached structures or units above TOTAL 287
New Large Home*** Basement ADU** Attached ADU** Basement ADU** Attached ADU** Neutral
detached garages Less Preferred
* Single-Family Detached Home
VISUAL
Neutral PREFERENCE EXERCISE Preferred
Table 4 - InfillLess
Residential Image Votes - People did not appear to support large homes being built on
Table 4 - Infill Residential Image** Votes
ADU = Accessory Dwelling Unit
Preferred Less LessLeastPreferred
Preferred Least Preferred consolidated lots *** Consolidated Lot
Visual preference exercises were completed for six categories: Multi-Family Residential, Signage, Infill Residential,
InfillEnhancements,
Residential Comment Type Infill ResidentialVotes Comment Type Votes tomorrow together Additional 27
INTERACTIVE WEBSITE
ignage,ParkInfillAmenities,
Residential, Streetscape
High-Rise Apartment and Placemaking
Townhouse
* Single-FamilyElements. The results
DetachedMid-Rise
Home Apartmentare summarized
Rowhouse below. Duplex
High-Rise Apartment Townhouse Mid-Rise Apartment Rowhouse DuplexPark Bathrooms Green Infrastructure Tree Canopy Dog Park
MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
e summarized below. The most preferred Infill Residential option Dwelling
** ADU = Accessory was theUnit Remodeled Remodeled Home* The most preferred 48 Infill Residential option was the Remodeled Remodeled Home* Most Preferred 48
MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Most Preferred *** Consolidated Lot
Single-Family Home, which received a total of 48 votes. The next Single-Family Home, which received a total of 48 votes.VISUAL
Most Preferred Neutral The nextPREFERENCE EXERCISE Neutral
two options with a higher number of votes were the Detached Detached ADU** two options with 35a higher number of votes were the Detached Detached ADU** Table 2 -35 Multi-Family Image Votes
PARK AMENITIES
Fourplex High-Rise Apartment
Accessory Dwelling Unit or ADU (35 votes) and the New Medium New Medium Home*Accessory Dwelling 31 Unit or ADU (35 votes) and the New Medium New Medium Home* Comment 31 Type Votes
Sized Single-Family Home with a Setback Garage (31 votes). Infill Sized Single-Family Home with a Setback Garage (31 votes). Infill Least Preferred
High-Rise Apartment 50
residential options with between 20 and 25 votes each included New Medium Home*residential 2 25 with between 20 and 25 votes each included
options New Medium Home* 2 25
Basement ADU** Attached ADU** Townhouse 50
New Medium Single-Family Homes with Detached Garage, Garage New Medium Single-Family Homes with Detached Garage, Garage
Garage ADU** 25 Multi-Family Residential Garage ADU** 25
Accessory Dwelling Unit, the New Narrow HomeTable and the4 -Modern
Infill Residential Image Votes Accessory Dwelling Unit, the New Narrow Home and the Modern Mid-Rise
Interactive WaterApartment
Feature Inclusive Playground 44Passive Water Feature Playgrou
Residential Image Votes Least Preferred The most preferred Multi-Family Residential images
and Micro Home options. The least preferred options were the New New Narrow Home* and Micro Home 23 options. The least preferred options werewere the New
High-Rise New Narrow
Apartment, Townhouse, Home*
Mid-Rise Rowhouse 23 32
Infill Residential Large Home on a consolidated lot and the basement Comment
and Type
attached Votes Prefer
pe High-Rise Apartment
Votes Townhouse
Fourplex Mid-Rise
Townouse Apartment Rowhouse
Mid-Rise Apartment Duplex
Rowhouse Large
Duplex
FourplexHome on a consolidated
Townouse lot and the basement andPark
Apartment attached
Bathrooms
Mid-Rise Apartment and Rowhouses. Green
The
Rowhouse Infrastructure
High-Rise Apartment Additional Tree Canopy
Duplex Duplex Dog Park Park Shelter
Modern Home* 20 units. 25
The
Duplexmost preferred Infill accessory
Residential option was
dwelling the Remodeled
units. Remodeled Home* 48 accessory dwelling that received the most votesModern was in theHome*
3-4 story range 20
Most Preferred Prefer
INTERACTIVE WEBSITE
Most
ome* Single-Family
Most Preferred 48
Preferred Neutral Neutral with an activated street front and mixed uses on the
INTERACTIVE WEBSITE
Home, which received a total of 48 votes. The next
Neutral Micro Home* Less Preferred
20 Micro Home*
Fourplex
Less Preferred
20
23
two options with Neutral
a higher number
These of votes
results indicatewerethatthesmall to medium-sizedDetached
Detached homes are ADU**
most 35 These results indicate that small to medium-sized homes
first story. The least preferred option were the second
are most and High-Rise Apartment. The
INTERACTIVE WEBSITE
U** 35 options for Fourplex Townhouse 2 21
Accessory Dwelling Unitdesired or ADU in (35Mission.
votes) andTherethealso
New Medium
appears to be support forMedium
certain types New Medium Home* 17
desired in Mission. There also appears to be supportsecond for certain
fourplextypes New Medium Home* 17
Home*Sized Single-Family 31
VISUAL
Home
PREFERENCE
with a Setback
of accessory dwellingGarage
units(31
EXERCISE
votes). Infill
(detached
New
and over a detached garage).
Home* 31
VISUAL
of accessoryPREFERENCE
dwelling units (detached EXERCISE
and over a detached
option was more generic in its exterior
garage).
Mid-Rise Apartment 2 17
and the high-rise apartment was 6+ stories. VISUAL PREFERENCE EXERCISE
residential options withPARK betweenAMENITIES
20 and 25 votes each included New Medium Home* 2 New Large 25 Home*** 15 New Large Home*** Rowhouse 15 2 15
Home*New 2 25
Medium Single-Family Homes with Detached Garage, Garage Basement ADU**
PARK AMENITIES
15
Overall, the preference seemed to be for human-scale
Basement ADU**
Placemaking SIGNAGE
Duplex 215
Elements* Formal Garden
12
Interpretive Signage Park Sign
- Preference seems to be for remodeling / rehabilitating existing
Garage ADU** 25 - Preference seems to be for remodeling / rehabilitating existing
mid-intensity density such as 3 to 4 story mixed-use
Accessory Dwelling 25 Unit, the New Narrow Home and the Modern apartment buildings,
Interactive townhomes,
Water Feature and
Inclusive rowhouses. Passive Water
Playground Preferred
FeatureLess2 Playground Equipment
Fourplex Benches5/ Seating Le
and Micro Home options. family-homes
The least preferred options were the New Attached ADU** family-homes 13 Attached ADU** 13
New Narrow Home* 23 Preferabove High-Rise Apartment 2 4
Neutral
ome* Large
Fourplex Home on23 a - Accessory
consolidated
Townouse lot dwelling
and the units
basement as detached
and attached
Mid-Rise Apartment structures or
Rowhouse units above
Table 2 - Multi-Family
TOTAL
Duplex - Accessory dwelling
Image Votes 287 units as detached structures or units Table 2 - TOTALMulti-Family Image Votes Park Amenities 287
accessory
Duplex dwelling units.detached
Fourplex garages High-Rise Apartment Modern Home* 20 detached
Fourplex garages High-Rise Apartment Park TOTAL
Bathrooms (51 votes) were the most commonly 298 selected park amenity foll
e* 20 Comment*Type Votes (49 votes) and Additional Tree Canopy (46 votes). Dog parks were also popular c
INTERACTIVE WEBSITE
Comment Type Votes
INTERACTIVE WEBSITE
Neutral Single-Family Detached Home
Less Preferred * Single-Family Detached Home * Art, Signage, etc.
- People did not appear to support large homes Micro beingHome*
built on 20 - People did not appear to support large homes being built on respectively. Park shelters, interactive water feature, inclusive playground and p
Less Preferred
These results indicate
20 that small to medium-sized Less
homes Preferred
Least Preferred
are most ** ADU = Accessory Dwelling Unit
High-Rise***Apartment
Consolidated Lot 50 lots
Least Preferred
High-Rise
*** Apartment
Consolidated Lot 32 and 37 votes.
50GatewayThe least
Option Apopular park amenity
Gateway Optionchoices
E were formal
Gateway garden
Option T (14
desired in Mission. Thereconsolidated
also appears lotsto be support for certain types New Medium Home* 17 consolidated VISUAL PREFERENCE EXERCISE
votes) and park signage / branding (10 votes).
tomorrow together 25
Home*of VISUAL
accessoryPREFERENCE
17
dwelling units (detachedEXERCISE
Park Bathrooms Green Infrastructure
and over a detached garage).
Additional Tree Canopy Dog Park
Townhouse
Park
ParkShelter
Bathrooms
50 Green Infrastructure Additional Tree Canopy Dog Park Park Shelter Most Preferred
PARK AMENITIES New Large Home*** 15 tomorrow together 27 Townhouse SIGNAGE tomorrow together
50 27
Table 5 - Park Amenity Image Votes
me*** PARK AMENITIES 15 Multi-Family
Most PreferredResidential Multi-Family
Most Preferred Residential
Prefer Interpretive Signage 44Prefer
INTERACTIVE WEBSITE
Mid-Rise Apartment 44 Mid-Rise Apartment
Placemaking Elements* Formal Garden Park Signage / Branding
- Preference seems to The
be most
for preferred
remodeling / Multi-Family
rehabilitating Residential
existing images Basement ADU** 15 The most preferred Multi-Family Residential images Comment Type Votes Comment Type
U** 15 Rowhouse 32 Apartment, Townhouse, Mid-Rise
family-homes were High-Rise Apartment, Townhouse, Mid-Rise Attached ADU** 13 were High-Rise Preferred Less Rowhouse 32
Park Bathrooms Least Preferred 51 Playground Equipm
** 13 Apartment and Rowhouses. The High-Rise Apartment
Duplex
Apartment and Rowhouses.
25
VISUAL PREFERENCE
The High-Rise Apartment EXERCISE
Duplex Green25 Infrastructure 49 Benches / Seating
- Accessory dwelling units thatas detached thestructures
most votesor units above Table 2 -range
Multi-Family Image Votes
received was in the 3-4 story TOTAL 287 that received the most votes was in the 3-4 story rangePark Amenities
mage Votes Fourplex garages
detached 287 withHigh-Rise Apartmentstreet front and mixed uses on the
an activated
Comment Type
* Single-Family
Fourplex
Detached Home Votes
with an activated
23 SIGNAGE
street front INTERACTIVE WEBSITE
Park Bathrooms (51 votes) were the most commonly selected
and mixed uses on the (49 votes) and Fourplex
Additional Tree Canopy (46
Gateway Option A
votes). Dog parks
Additional
were
Gateway Option
23
also
Dog Epark
Tree Canopy
park amenity
popular
followed closely by Green46
Gateway Option O
choices
Gateway Option T
with
Gateway Option G
46 and 40
Infrastructure
Gateway
votes,
Placemaking Elem
Gateway Option J
40 Option P Formal GatewayGardenOptio
- People did
etached Home not appearfirst
Votes story. The
to support leasthomes
large preferred option
being builtwere
on the second ** ADU = Accessory Dwelling Unit first story. The least preferred option were the second respectively. Park shelters, interactive
VISUAL PREFERENCE EXERCISE water feature, inclusive playground and passive water feature all had between
Least Preferred Townhouse 2 Prefer
y Dwelling Unit
consolidated lots options for Fourplex and High-Rise Apartment. High-RiseThe***Apartment
Consolidated Lot 50 options for 21 Fourplex and High-Rise Apartment. The 32 and 37 votes.Townhouse 2 Preferred
The least popular
Most park amenity choices were 21 garden (14 votes), interpretive signage
formal
Park Shelter 37 (12 Interpretive Signag
t 50 second fourplex option was more generic in its exterior Mid-Rise Apartment second /fourplex
SIGNAGE
option was more generic in its exterior votes) and park signage / branding (10 votes).
50 2 17 Feature Mid-Rise Apartment 2 17 Water Feature
Park Bathrooms Interactive Water Feature
Green Infrastructure Inclusive Playground
Additional Tree Canopy Passive
Dog ParkWater Feature Playground
Park ShelterEquipment Benches
Interactive Seating
Water Inclusive Playground Passive Water Feature Playground Equipment BenchesInteractive
/ Seating 34 Park Signage / Bran
Park Shelter and the high-rise apartment was 6+ stories. Townhouse tomorrow together 27 and the high-rise apartment was 6+ stories.
tomorrow
Multi-Family together
50 Residential
27 Table 5 - Park Amenity Image Votes Inclusive TOTAL
Rowhouse 2 15 Rowhouse 2 15 Playground 32
Most Preferred
INTERACTIVE WEBSITE
Most Preferred Prefer
INTERACTIVE WEBSITE
Prefer Mid-Rise Apartment 44 Prefer Neutral Neutral
44Prefer Multi-Family
The most preferred Overall, the Residential
preference images
seemed to be for human-scale
Duplex 2
Overall, the preference seemed to be for human-scale
12
Comment Type Votes Comment
Passive WaterType Feature Votes
32
Rowhouse 32 Duplex 2 12
were High-Rise Apartment, Townhouse,
mid-intensity Mid-Rise
density such as 3 to 4 story mixed-use mid-intensity density such as 3 to 4 story mixed-use Park Bathrooms 51 Playground Equipment 29
Apartment 32 and Rowhouses. VISUAL PREFERENCE
The High-Rise
apartment buildings, townhomes,EXERCISE
Apartment and rowhouses. Fourplex 2 *VISUAL
apartment 5PREFERENCE
Art, Signage, buildings,
etc. townhomes, EXERCISE
and
Gateway Option Arowhouses. Gateway Option E FourplexGateway 2 Option T Gateway 5Gateway
Option P Gateway Option B
Duplex 25 Green Infrastructure 49 * Art, Signage,
Benches etc. Option M
/ Seating Gateway Option 24 D Gateway Option H
that received 25 the most votes was in the 3-4 story range Gateway Option O Gateway Option G Gateway Option J Gateway Option Q Gateway Optio
with an activated street front SIGNAGE

and mixed uses on the Fourplex
High-Rise Apartment
23
2 SIGNAGE 4 Most Preferred Gateway Option A AdditionalHigh-Rise
Gateway Option
Tree E Apartment
Canopy Gateway 2 Option
46 T Gateway 4Option P Elements
Neutral
Placemaking Gateway Option B
Prefer
24
Prefer Neutra
first story. The 23 least preferred option were the second TOTAL 298 Most Preferred Dog park
TOTAL 40 Formal Garden
298 Prefer14
options for Fourplex and High-Rise Apartment. The Townhouse 2 21 Park Shelter 37 Interpretive Signage 12
21
second fourplex option was more generic in its exterior Mid-Rise Apartment 2 17
Interactive Water Feature Inclusive Playground Passive Water Feature Playground Equipment Benches / Seating Interactive Water Feature 34 Park Signage / Branding 10
nt and the/high-rise
Benches 17
Seating apartment was 6+Elements*
Placemaking stories. Formal Garden Interpretive Signage Park Signage / Branding Placemaking Elements* Formal Garden Interpretive Signage Park Signage / Branding
Rowhouse 2 15 Inclusive Playground 32 TOTAL 434
INTERACTIVE WEBSITE
Prefer
Overall,Neutral
mid-intensity
15
the preference
density
PreferredtoLess
seemed
such as 3 to
be for human-scale
4 story mixed-use
Duplex 2 LessLeast
Neutral
Preferred
Preferred
12
tomorrow together
Preferred Less
25
Passive Water Feature Least Preferred32
Gateway Option S Gateway Option L Gateway Option C
12 P Gateway Option M Gateway Option D Gateway Option H Gateway Option F Gateway Optio
VISUAL
Gateway Option PREFERENCE
apartment buildings, townhomes, Gateway EXERCISE
Gateway Option B
and rowhouses.
Option A Gateway Option E Fourplex 2 Gateway Option T Gateway 5
Option P Gateway
Gateway Option
Option A
B Gateway Option E Gateway Option O Option TGateway Option
Gateway G
Gateway Gateway
Option P Option J Gateway Gateway
OptionOption
Less B Q
Preferred Gateway Option K
SIGNAGE Park Amenities * Art, Signage, etc. Gateway Option O Gateway Option G Gateway Option J Gateway Option Q tomorrow
Gateway Option K together 28
5
* Art, Signage, etc.
Park Amenities Neutral
SIGNAGE Park
Most Bathrooms
PreferredPrefer
(51 votes) were the most High-RisecommonlyApartmentselected park 2 amenity followed4closely by Green Infrastructure
MostBathrooms
Park Preferred
Prefer
(51 votes) were the most commonly selected park amenity followed closely by Green Infrastructure
Prefer Prefer
Table
Prefer 3 - Signage Image Neutral
Votes
Neutral
4 (49 votes) and Additional Tree Canopy (46 votes). Dog parks were also popular choices with 46 and 40 votes,
(49 votes) and Additional Tree Canopy (46 votes). Dog parks were also popular choices with 46 and 40 votes, Comment Type
298
respectively. Park shelters, interactive water TOTAL
feature, inclusive playground and passive 298water feature all had between
respectively. Park shelters, interactive water feature, inclusive playground and passive INTERACTIVE WEBSITE
water feature all had between
Gateway Option A
Votes
29
Comment Type
Gateway Option J
V
32 and 37 votes. The least popular park amenity choices were formal garden (14 votes), interpretive signage
32 and (12 The least popular park amenity choices were formal garden
37 votes. VISUAL
(14 votes), PREFERENCE
interpretive signage EXERCISE (12
votes) and park signage / branding (10 votes). votes) and park signage / branding (10 votes). Gateway Option E 24 Gateway Option Q
Placemaking Elements* Formal Garden Interpretive Signage Park Signage / Branding STREETSCAPE ENHANCEMENTS
Gateway Option T 22 Gateway Option K
ing
Table 5 - Park Amenity Image Votes tomorrow together 25 Table 5 - Park Amenity Image Votes
Gateway Option S Gateway Option L Gateway Option C Gateway Option I Gateway Optio
Preferred Less Least Preferred Gateway Option M Gateway Option D Gateway Option H Gateway
Gateway Option F Option P
Gateway 20N
Option Gateway Option M
rred Comment Type Votes Comment Type Votes Neutral
Less Preferred
Gateway Option B 18
Neutral Gateway Option D
Least
Gateway
Gateway Option
Option Q
A Gateway
Gateway Option
Option KE Gateway Option T Gateway Option P Gateway Option B Comment Type Votes Comment Type Votes
Gateway Option O Gateway Option G Gateway Option J Gateway Option Q Gateway
Gateway Option
Option O
K Gateway Option G Gateway Option J Gateway Option
Table Option Q
3 - Signage Gateway
Image Gateway
Votes Option K
Park Amenities
Gateway Option B
Park Bathrooms 51 Playground Equipment 29 Bathrooms Gateway Option M Gateway Option D Gateway H Option F
Gateway Gateway
Option O Option
18 N Gateway Option H
Park 51 Playground Equipment 29
Most
Most
Park
sely by (49
Green Preferred
Preferred
Bathrooms (51 votes) wereNeutral
Prefer
Infrastructure Prefer
Green Infrastructure 49 Benches / Seating
Prefer
the most commonly selected park amenity followed closely by Green Infrastructure Prefer Neutral
24 InfrastructureNeutral
Comment Type VotesNeutral
Comment
Gateway Type G
Option Votes
15 Comment Type
NeutralGateway Option F
V
votes) and Additional Tree Canopy (46 votes). Dog parks were also popular choices with 46 and 40 votes, Green 49 Benches / SeatingGateway Option A 24 Gateway
th 46 and 40 votes,Park shelters, interactive water feature, inclusive playground and passive water feature all had between Green Infrastructure 29 Gateway Option J
Multi-Purpose Path Parklet 15Additional Street Trees Option NPark
Linear
respectively. Additional Tree Canopy 46 Placemaking Elements 24
ter feature all had
32 and between
37 votes. The least popular park amenity choices were formal garden (14 votes), interpretive signage (12 Additional Tree Canopy 46 Placemaking Elements
Gateway
Most Option E
Preferred 24 24 Gateway Option Q 13 Gateway Option S P
terpretive signage
votes) (12 signage / branding
and park Dog park(10 votes). 40 Formal Garden 14 park Gateway Option T 22 Gateway Option K 12 Gateway Option L
Dog 40 Option S
Gateway Formal Garden
Gateway Option L Gateway Option C 14
Gateway Option I Gateway Option R
Gateway Option P
12 20
Gateway Option C Gateway Option M
Park Shelter 37 Interpretive Signage 12 Shelter
Park 37Preferred Interpretive Signage 12
Table 5 - Park Amenity Image Votes Less
Gateway Option B 18 Gateway Option D
Least Preferred
11 Gateway Option I
Interactive Water Feature 34 Park Signage / Branding 10 Park Signage / Branding 10
Comment Type Votes Comment Type Votes Interactive Water Feature 34
Table 3 - Signage Image Votes
Gateway Option O 18 Gateway Option H 9 Gateway Option R
Votes
Gateway
Gateway Option FO
Option Gateway Option
Gateway Option N
Inclusive
G
Playground
Gateway Option J Gateway Option
TOTALQ
32 Gateway Option H
Gateway Option K 434
Gateway Option M Gateway Option D Gateway Option H Gateway Option F Gateway Option N
Gateway Option K Gateway Option M Gateway Option D Gateway Option F Gateway Option
Inclusive N
Playground Gateway Option S Comment
32 Gateway Type TOTAL
Option L Votes GatewayComment
Option
Gateway Type
C
Option G 15434Option
Votes
Gateway Comment
I
Gateway Type
OptionGateway
F Votes
Option
5 R TOTAL 2
Park Bathrooms 51 Playground Equipment 29
INTERACTIVE WEBSITE
Food Truck Area Pedestrian Refuge Island Curb Bump Out
Prefer29 Neutral
Passive Water Feature 32 Neutral Neutral Gateway Option A 29 Gateway Option J 15 Gateway
NeutralOption N 4
InfrastructureNeutral Neutral
Passive Water Feature 32 tomorrow toge
Neutral
Green 49 Benches / Seating 24 Less Preferred Neutral Least Least Preferred
Preferred
24 Gateway Option E 24 Gateway Option Q 13 Gateway Option S 4
Additional Tree Canopy
24
46 Placemaking Elements 24 VISUAL PREFERENCE
EXERCISE
Table 3 - Signage Image
Gateway Votes
Option T 22 Gateway Option
Streetscape K 12
tomorrow together
Enhancements Gateway Option L
28
INTERACTIVE WEBSITE
2
Dog park 40 Formal Garden 14 STREETSCAPE ENHANCEMENTS Gateway Option P 20 VISUAL

The two most
Gateway PREFERENCE
preferred
Option M streetscape12EXERCISE
enhancements
Gateway wereOptionGreen
C Infrastructure
1 (57 votes) and Multi-Purpose P
14 Comment Type Votes Comment Type
votes). Close behind Votes
these two was a Comment Type
Parklet with 41 votes. Additional Votes Linear Park, and Food Truck
Street Trees,
Gateway Option B 18 PLACEMAKING
all received Option D30ELEMENTS
Gatewaybetween and 34 11votes each. Gateway
Pedestrian Option
RefugeI Island had1 approximately 19 votes. The least sele
Park Shelter 37 Interpretive Signage 12
12 Gateway Option A Gateway Option
29 O Gateway
18 Option
streetscape
Gateway J Option H 15
enhancement was
9
a Curb Gateway
Bump Out,
Gateway Option
which N
only
Option R receives 7 4
1 votes.
Interactive Water Feature 34 Park Signage / Branding 10
10 Gateway Option E Gateway Option
24 G Gateway
15 Option
Generally,
Gateway QOption
the F 13
enhancements selected
5 Gateway
were TOTAL
related Option
to streetSbeautification
236 4 and sustainability. Direct pedestria
Gateway
Gateway Option
Option IM Gateway
Gateway Option
Option RD Gateway Option
TOTALH Gateway Option F Gateway Option
434Option IN Gateway safety improvements such as a refuge island or curb bump out were the least selected options. These two fact
Inclusive Playground Gateway Option S 32 Gateway Option L Gateway Option C Gateway Gateway Option
Option SR Gateway Option L Gateway Option C Gateway Option I Gateway Option R
Gateway
434 Option N Gateway Option T 22 Gateway Option K 12 Gateway Option L
tomorrow together 2a priority
26
INTERACTIVE WEBSITE
collectively point towards an improved pedestrian experience being more than pedestrian safety alo
Neutral
Passive Water FeatureLessLeast
Preferred
Neutral Less Preferred
Preferred32 Neutral Less Preferred
Least Preferred Gateway Option P 20
However,
Gateway Option M
separating paths
12
for pedestrian
Least
users itself
Preferred
Gateway
helps
Option C
to enhance safety
1
as well.

Table 3 - Signage Image Votes Table Gateway
Votes Option
3 - Signage ImageMulti-Purpose
Green Infrastructure Path B 18
Parklet Gateway Gathering Space
Option
Additional D Trees
Street 11Mural ParkGateway
Table
Linear
Enhanced Alley
Option
6 - Streetscape I
Enhancements
Art Installation
1
Image Votes
Plaza Space
tomorrow together
STREETSCAPE ENHANCEMENTS
28
tomorrow together 28 Most Preferred P
VotesSTREETSCAPE ENHANCEMENTS
Comment Type Votes
Comment
Votes Comment Type
Type Votes Comment
Most
Comment Type Type
Preferred
Votes
Gateway
Votes Option O
Comment 18
Type Gateway
Votes Option H
Comment 9
Type
Comment Type Option
Gateway
Votes
Prefer
R Votes
1
Green Infrastructure 57
INTERACTIVE WEBSITE
15 Gateway OptionGateway
N 4 Gateway Option G
Gateway 15 J
Option Gateway
15 Option F
Gateway 5
Option N TOTAL
4 236
Option A 29 Gateway Option J 15 Gateway OptionGateway
N Option
4 A 29 Multi-Purpose path 55
13 Gateway OptionGateway
S 4
Option E 24 Gateway Option Q 13 Gateway Option E 24 Gateway Option Q 13 Gateway Option S 4 tomorrow together 26
Gateway Option S 4 Parklet 41
Gateway Option S Gateway Option2L Gateway Option C Gateway Option I Gateway Option R
12 Gateway Option L Gateway Option K 12 Gateway Option L Additional2Street Trees 34
Gateway Option R Gateway Option T 22 Gateway Option K 12 Gateway OptionGateway
L Option
2 T 22
12 Less Preferred
Gateway OptionGateway
C 1
PLACEMAKING ELEMENTS Oversized Planters Linear Park Iconic Benches
Crosswalk Art 32Piano
Public Sculptural Bus Sto
Option P 20 Gateway Option M 12 Least Preferred
C Option
1 P 20 Gateway Option M 12 Gateway Option C 1
Least Preferred Food Truck Area 30
11 Neutral Preferre
I 1
Option B 18 Gateway Option D 11 Gateway Option B 18 Gateway Option D 11 Gateway Option I 1
Table 3 - Signage ImageMulti-Purpose
Green Infrastructure Votes Path Parklet Additional Street Trees Linear ParkGateway Option I
Food Truck Area
1 Pedestrian Refuge Island Curb Bump Out Pedestrian Refuge Island 19
9 Gateway Option R 1 Gateway OptionGateway
R Option
1 O 18 Gateway Option H 9 Gateway Option R Curb Bump
Placemaking Elements 1 Out
Comment Type Gateway
Votes Option O
Comment 18
Type Gateway
Votes Option H
Comment 9
Type Votes 7
ent Type
5
Most
Most Preferred
Preferred
Votes
TOTAL 236
Prefer Neutral Less Preferred
Least Preferred The most voted on placemaking element, by 14 votes, was Gathering Space, which received 61 votes. The next
Gateway Option236 G 15 Gateway Option F 5 TOTAL TOTAL 236 275 Alley (44 votes). Art installatio
INTERACTIVE WEBSITE
Gateway Option A Gateway
29 Option G
Gateway 15 J
Option Gateway
15 Option F
Gateway 5
Option N TOTAL4
two most popular placemaking elements were Murals (47 votes) and Enhanced
and Plaza Space each received 33 and 32 votes, respectively. The least popular elements were Public Piano, wh
ay Option N 4
tomorrow together 26 Streetscape Enhancements receives 13 votes, and Sculptural Bus Stop, which received only 5 votes.
Gateway Option E 24 Gateway Option Q 13 Gateway Option S 4 tomorrow together 26
ay OptionVISUAL PREFERENCE EXERCISE
S 4 The two most
Gathering Space
preferred streetscape
Mural
enhancements were Green
Enhanced Alley
Infrastructure
Art
(57 votes)
Installation
Generally,
and Multi-Purpose
the top three choicesPlaza Space
were
Path (55
about creating actually places for people to spend time, such as gatheri
ay Option PLACEMAKING ELEMENTS
Gateway Option T
PLACEMAKING
L 2
Gateway Option P
22
ELEMENTS
20
Gateway Option K
Gateway Option M
12
12
Gateway Option L 2 votes). Close behind these two was a Parklet with 41 votes. Additional Street
all
Most received between 30 and 34 votes each. Pedestrian Refuge Island had approximately
Preferred
Trees, Linear
public art examples
Park, and
19included
votes. The
Food
within
Truck
spaces or enhanced alleys, or features that drawn
least selected
the list
Area
Prefer
were
in visitors such as a unique mural or art installations. Specifi
less popular. It is difficult to know if this is because
tomorrow of the spe
togeth
Gateway Option C 1
ay Option C 1 streetscape enhancement was a Curb Bump Out, which only receives 7 votes.
example shown in the image or if public art in this form overall is not preferred.
Gateway Option B 18 Gateway Option D 11 Gateway Option I 1
ay OptionFood
I Truck Area1 Pedestrian Refuge Island Curb Bump Out
Generally, the enhancements selected were related to street beautification and sustainability. Direct pedestrian
Table 7 - Placemaking Elements Image Votes
Gateway Option O 18 Gateway Option H 9 Gateway Option R 1 safety improvements such as a refuge island or curb bump out were the least selected options. These two factors
ay Option R
Neutral 1 Least Preferred Comment Type Votes
Gateway Option G 15 Gateway Option F 5 TOTAL 236 collectively point towards an improved pedestrian experience being more a priority than pedestrian safety alone.
236 Gathering Space 61
However, separating paths for pedestrian users itself helps to enhance safety as well.
Streetscape Enhancements tomorrow together 26 Mural 47
tomorrow
The twotogether 26 streetscape enhancements were Green Infrastructure (57 votes) and Multi-Purpose Path (55
most preferred Enhanced Alley 44
Gathering Space Mural Enhanced Alley Art Installation Plaza Space Oversized Planters Crosswalk Art Iconic Benches Public Piano Sculptural Bus Stop
Plaza Space
votes). Close behind these two was a Parklet with 41 votes. Additional Street Trees, Linear Park, and Food Truck Area Table 6 - Streetscape Enhancements Image Votes Art Installation 33
all received between 30 and 34 votes each. Pedestrian Refuge Island had approximately 19 votes. The least selected
Most
Most
streetscapePreferred
Preferred Prefer
enhancement was a Curb Bump Out, which only receives 7 votes.
Prefer Neutral Comment Type Votes PlazaPreferred
Space Less 32
Green Infrastructure 57 Oversized Planters 29

Generally, the enhancements selected were related to street beautification and sustainability. Direct pedestrian Placemaking Elements Crosswalk Art 27
safety improvements such as a refuge island or curb bump out were the least selected options. These two factors Multi-Purpose
The most voted on placemaking element, path was Gathering Space,55
by 14 votes, which received 61 votes. The next
Iconic Benches 27
collectively point towards an improved pedestrian experience being more a priority than pedestrian safety alone. two most popular placemaking elements
Parklet were Murals (47 votes) and Enhanced
41 Alley (44 votes). ArtPublic
installation
Piano 13
However, separating paths for pedestrian users itself helps to enhance safety as well. and Plaza Space each received 33 and 32 votes, respectively. The least popular elements were Public Piano, which
Additional
receives 13 votes, and Sculptural Bus Street
Stop, which Trees only 5 votes.
received 34 Sculptural Bus Stop 5
Sculptural Bus Stop Linear Park 32 TOTAL 318

Oversized
SculpturalPlanters
Bus Stop Crosswalk Table
Art Iconic Benches
6 - Streetscape Public Piano
Enhancements Image Votes Generally, the top three choices were about creating actually places for people to spend time, such as gathering
spaces or enhanced alleys, or features
Foodthat drawn
Truck Areain visitors such as a unique 30mural or art installations. Specific
NeutralPreferred Less Comment Type Votes Preferred Less
Less Preferred public art examples included within the list were less popular. It is difficult to know if this is because of the specific tomorrow togeth
Green Infrastructure 57 example shown in the image or if Pedestrian
public art inRefuge Island
this form 19
overall is not preferred.
Placemaking Elements Curb Bump Out 7
Multi-Purpose path 55
eived 61 The most
votes. Thevoted
next on placemaking element, by 14 votes, was Gathering Space, which received 61 votes. The next Table 7 - Placemaking Elements Image Votes
TOTAL 275
two
44 votes). Artmost popular placemaking elements
installation Parklet were Murals (47 votes) and Enhanced 41 Alley (44 votes). Art installation
and Plaza Space
ts were Public Piano, which each received 33 and 32 votes, respectively. The least popular elements were Public Piano, which Comment Type Votes
Additional Street Trees
receives 13 votes, and Sculptural Bus Stop, which received only 5 votes. 34
Gathering Space 61
Linear Park 32
Generally, the top
d time, such as gathering three choices were about creating actually places for people to spend time, such as gathering Mural 47
Foodthat
spaces or enhanced alleys, or features Truck Areain visitors such as a unique
drawn 30mural or art installations. Specific
Comment Types
public input review
INTERACTIVE WEBSITE MAPPING TOOL
Idea Less of This Bike Facility
Sustainability
INTERACTIVE
MAP COMMENTSMAPPING Favorite Place Trail Idea Idea
Participants on the interactive engagement website were able toTable 1 - comments
provide Total Comments by Comment Type
and place
All Comment Transportation
them directlyTypes
onto a map of Mission. This interactive tool was extremely helpful in gathering the More of This Sidewalk Idea
Idea
Visitors to the
thecommunity.
public engagement website were Comment Type Count Share
ideas of The results of this toolable
can to
be leave
found below.
comments regarding the existing conditions of the City of Mission.
Idea 116 47.9%
IDEA Comment Types

More of this Mohawk 25Park - “This 10.3%
park has HUGE potential to be a jewel for the
neighborhood. It’s mostly unimproved since tearing down the grade school ALL COMMENTS - 242
Martway North of Aquatic Center - eyesores, need to be torn down
or new tenants, dog park location, keep the trees here if redeveloped,
47.9% of total comments years ago” Want to see: bathroom facility, splash pad, dog park, more trees,
Transportation Idea 25 10.3%
more amenities, more shade Farmer’s market parking difficult, ped crossing scary
Sustainability Idea 24 Park - well maintained
Streamway 9.9% trail, park / vegetation needs some TLC Figure
61st street 1 used
commonly - All Comment
as cut Types
thru for Target or SMP - speed bump
Want to see: playground, lighting (safety), access to Turkey Creek, bridge over or two would be good
69 Highway, signage, dog park
Sustainability Favorite Place 15 6.2%
Favorite Place Trail Idea Idea Waterworks Park - needs enhancements to activate space / draw people Gateway Site - multiple complaints, request for intervention, ideas for
to park, standing water near school park / gathering space
Sidewalk Idea 13 5.4%
Sidewalk Idea Transportation Broadmoor Park - walking path needs re-paving, ramp for trail access, dog Target - needs more than once exit
More of This Idea park option
Less of this 11 4.5% Rock Creek Trail - needs more shade trees, benches, bike racks,
Anderson X Park - add mural to racquetball courts, keep tennis courts but
pet waste stations, to be a truly linear park experience rather than a
update them, dog park option
Trail Idea 9 3.7% wide sidewalk, add solar light benches, public art along trail, build an
General Park Ideas - Signage to show distance between parks, dog park overhead shelter for the market space like DT OP, crime prevention via
enviro design enhancements
BIke Facility 4
highly requested, 1.7%
add pocket park downtown at Old Backyard Burgers
ALL COMMENTS - 242 Gazebo
Chik-Fil-A / Culvers / Panera - stacking doesn’t work, could impede
TOTAL 242
Dog Park 100.0%
- multiple locations proposed including north of Panera Bread, emergency vehicles
along Martway St, Anderson X Park,
Lamar & W 61st Street - high foot traffic crosswalk

Figure 1 - All Comment Types Johnson Drive - more retail, replace lost tenants, work with some property
owners to resurface parking Building east of Security Bank - several comments about need to
redevelop this building, possible dog park or outdoor food truck facility
Streetscape on Johnson Drive - consistent street design from Metcalf to
MAP COMMENTS Roe (bike/ped friendly) with lighting, building, facades Street car down Johnson Drive - long-term idea
Table 1 - Total Comments by Comment

Sidewalk Type
under 69 Highway is creepy - graffiti and overgrown vegetation Former Pride Cleaners Location - calls for it to be demolished,
All Comment Types complaints about code violations
Visitors to the public engagement website were able to leave Comment Type Count Share
Consider dropping Metcalf to “at grade” with Johnson
Multiple comments about signage at entrances
comments regarding the existing conditions of the City of Mission. Martway Street - any redevelopment needs to be ped friendly along the trail
Idea 116 47.9%
More of this 25 10.3%
Comment Types
FAVORITE Transportation Idea 25
There were a total of 15 10.3%
‘Favorite Place’ comments placed throughout the
PLACE
City of Mission and beyond.
6.2% of total comments Sustainability Idea Favorite24
places include: 9.9%
Waterworks Park - great for walking
Favorite Place Trail Idea Idea Highlands Elementary is a fabulous school with a wonderful staff
Osage Orange trees in median along W 61st Terrace please preserve
Sidewalk Idea 13
this median 5.4%
Sidewalk Idea Transportation
More of This Idea Less of this 11 4.5%
Mission Market - would love to see it get bigger and more permanent
Great coffee shop - Urban Prairie Coffee
Trail Idea 9
Victor X Anderson 3.7%
Park - love the outdoor racquetball, pool and tennis courts
R-Park in Roeland Park
BIke Facility 4 1.7%
ALL COMMENTS - 242
Matney Park in Kansas City
TOTAL 242 100.0%
MAP COMMENTS
Figure 1 - All Comment Types
Table 1 - Total Comments by Comment Type
All Comment Types
Visitors to the public engagement website were able to leave Comment Type Count Share
comments regarding the existing conditions of the City of Mission.
Idea 116 47.9%
Comment Types
Sustainability Idea 24 9.9%
MORE OFPlace
Favorite THIS Trail Idea Idea
10.3% of total comments Amenities - Rock Creek Trail is a great amenity! Opportunity to spruce up alley spaces in downtown.
Sidewalk Idea Transportation Lights on the tennis courts at Victor X Anderson Park are great! Great local bars / breweries in Downtown.
More of This Idea Less of this 11 4.5%
Mission has a great community center! Love the new apartments - tons of new residents and still fits in with
Mission.
Trail Idea tomorrow together
Continue9 3.7%
to make Mohawk 15add additional parks like this in
Park better and
Mission. Excited for new drive through car wash!
ALL COMMENTS - 242 Services - Thank you for the new food bank. There is definitely people
struggling in the community. Consider more food bank locations throughout
The properties developed under the form-based code look great. The
required streetscape really enhances the area and makes it feel more
TOTAL 242
Mission. 100.0% pedestrian friendly.
So glad to have ripple glass at the Hy-Vee parking lot. Other Comments - Love all the beautification along Broadmoor. Great
Figure 1 - All Comment Types job!
Infrastructure - The resurfaced Lamar Avenue with curbs, sidewalks and
bike lane looks great! Improvements made to the Mission Towers satellite parking lot is great!
Such a great trail / sidewalk / crosswalk along Nall and across Shawnee Keep Broadmoor Park for families and kids to enjoy - no dog park here.
Mission Parkway.

Script Pro takes good care of their property and even has an outdoor
Development - The building at Nall and Martway just added a rooftop basketball hoop. More of this is needed throughout Mission.
patio. Its great!
ACTIVE WEBSITE MAPPING TOOL MAP COMMENTS

More development similar to townhomes on W 60th Terrace. The city should
encourage mixed-use buildings with a diversity of incomes and intensity to
encourage community and walkability. Table 1 - Total Comments by Com
MENTS All Comment Types
Some great businesses along Johnson Drive - block with Urban Prairie,
Visitors to Brian’s
the Bakery,
publicetc... engagement website
Mission. were able to leave
Comment Type Count
Table 1 - Total Comments by Comment Type Sandhills, is the best of downtown
pes comments
Supportingregarding theshould
small businesses existing
be a keyconditions
priority. Small of the
retail City of Mission.
fronts
encourage pedestrian activity. Idea 116
ublic engagement website were able to leave Comment Type Count Share
ng the existing conditions of the City of Mission. More of this 25
Idea 116 47.9% Comment Types
Transportation Idea 25
LESS OF
Comment THIS
Types
Beautification needed along the northIdea
side of
BIKE FACILITIES
Less of This Bike Facility
4.5% of total comments
Johnson Drive between Metcalf Avenue and
1.7% of total comments Sustainability Idea 24
Transportation Idea 25
Broadmoor Street.
10.3%
Less of This Bike Facility Sustainability Favorite Place 15
Sustainability Idea 24 on9.9%
Favorite Place
the SEtomorrow
Trailinclude:
Bike Facility ideas Idea Idea
Commercial property corner of together 15
Johnson Drive and Outlook Road needs a refresh. Add a bike share station in the western area of
Sustainability Sidewalk Idea 13
ce Trail Idea Favorite Place Possible 15 6.2%
second story added for residential use? the city. This would allow people to use transit
Transportation
Idea Opportunity to restaurant patio in rear along
MoreRockof This Sidewalk
into/out of Mission Idea
and utilize bikes within it
Creek Trail Idea Less of this 11
Sidewalk Idea 13 5.4% Add more bike racks and facilities like the bike fix-
Sidewalk Idea Transportation Crossing Johnson Drive by foot is still scary. it station along the Rock Creek Trail
Trail Idea 9
s Idea Less of this Enhance 11
BP gas station at4.5%
Johnson / Nall. Corner Add bike / scooter rental station at the Mission
is unsightly and needs to be better maintained. BIke Facility 4
ALL COMMENTS - 242
Transit Center
Trail Idea 9 3.7%
Failed Gateway project needs to be addressed -
site is an eyesore.
Finish the Turkey Creek Trail so it connects to TOTAL 242
BIke Facility 4 1.7% other cities in Johnson County and to routes going
LL COMMENTS - 242 Locale development on Johnson Drive does not fit
to downtown
TOTAL 242
within the 100.0%
character of Mission. Parking garage is Figure 1 - All Comment Types
a behemoth and casts large shadows.
Figure 1 - All Comment Types Parking lots in western gateway area poorly
designed / confusing.
public input review
WEBSITE MAPPING TOOL
INTERACTIVE MAPPING
bsite Participants
were able toonleave
the interactive engagement
Comment Type website Count
were able to provide comments and place
Share
them directly onto a map of Mission. This interactive tool was extremely helpful in gathering the
ons of the City of Mission.
ideas of the community. The Idea 116
results of this tool can be found 47.9%
below.
SUSTAINABILITY Transportation Idea 25 10.3% Community Gardens - Expand community garden Invest in green infrastructure along Rock Creek and design facilities
IDEABike Facility Sustainability Idea 24 9.9%
opportunities, including those on Lamar Avenue for 500-year (or more) floods. Consider more detailed floodplain /
6.2% of total comments watershed plans.
Opportunity for community garden near Target along
Sustainability Favorite Place 15 6.2% Rock Creek Trail? Convert medians and edges of Shawnee Mission Parkway into bioswales.
Idea
How do we encourage brownfield clean-up projects? Would like to see more green infrastructure elements in the Mission
Sidewalk Idea 13 5.4% Market area. It is a great spot for rain gardens, educational signage to
ea Transportation Services / Amenities - Add more electric charging describe BMP’s.
Idea Less of this 11 4.5% stations throughout Mission.
Other Comments - Would like to see native / pollinator gardens in
Mission should promote carpool, EV stations, bike and Mission park facilities. It would also be greater if there were pesticide /
Trail Idea 9 3.7% pedestrian infrastructure, and transit options to reduce herbicide free zones.
transportation pollution.
BIke Facility 4 1.7% Preserve natural features north of W 51st St. between Riggs and
S - 242 City facilities should be built and certified with LEED
standards.
Foxridge.
TOTAL 242 100.0% Light pollution is a serious threat to many environmental entities from
Appreciate recycling opportunities throughout sleep deprivation to animal migration. Some signs along Johnson Drive
the community (Target, Ripple Glass). Expand this are too bright and has a negative impact on nearby neighbors. Regulate
ment Types throughout Mission. things like this.
Consider adding curbside leaf pickup as a city service.

Would reduce the number of bags going to the landfill.
Maybe the Gateway site is better positioned as a large

green space with an outdoor events center. Would be
a place people from Fairway, Mission and Roeland Park
would go.
ACTIVE WEBSITE MAPPING TOOL Green Infrastructure - Diminish impervious surfaces

along Rock Creek Trail. This will alleviate intensity of
MENTS
flooding and enhance the trail experience.

pes
blic SIDEWALK
engagement website were able to leave Comment Type Count Share
A
IDEAS
Nall Park
e
ng the existing conditions of the City of Mission.
u
Add sidewalks along
en
Idea 116 47.9% W 60th Terrace
Av
Sidewalk needed
ar
5.4% of total comments from 51st / Foxridge
m
La
to Lamar / Foxridge
Nall Avenue
B
The ideas for More of this 25 10.3% Widen sidewalks from Shawnee
Comment Types
needed sidewalks
Streamway
Park W 51st St.
Mission Pkwy to Rock Creek Trail
and install crosswalks at Roeland Dr. /

Shawnee Mission Pkwy
were mapped for
Less
greater of This
clarity and Bike Facility Water Works
C Add temporary sidewalk during
Park
construction. When project is
understanding. That complete, have a nice wide pedestrian
and patio area in front of retail
ce map canTrailbe viewed Sidewalk connection
Idea Idea
between Foxrigde
Enhance sidewalk
condition from Johnson
D
to the far right. and Broadmoor Park W 55th St.
Drive to Water Works Park Add sidewalk under
Shawnee Mission Pkwy
Sidewalk Idea Transportation
s
Broadmoor
Larger buffer
Idea
Park
Less of this 11 4.5% between cars and
sidewalk needed C
Trail Idea 9 3.7% Johnson Drive B
ky
Pw
A
BIke Facility 4 1.7% Pearl Harbor
on
LL COMMENTS - 242
Park
si
is
M
Sidewalk here would
e
ne
make it easier for Victor X Andersen
TOTAL 242 100.0%
aw
students to walk to Park
Sh
high school
ACTIVE WEBSITE MAPPING TOOL

Add pedestrian flashing
beacon to encourage
Enhance sidewalk to students to walk to
prevent “criss-crossing” Highlands Elementary
Lamar to walk to
MENTS Downtown Mission
Table 1 - Total Comments by Comment Type Source: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community
pes
TRAIL IDEAS Comment Type Count Share
ublic 3.7%
engagement website were able to leave
of total comments
Extend Turkey
Creek Trail to
ng the existing conditions of the City of Mission. Nall Park
ue
Nall Park
Idea 116 47.9%
en
The ideas for

Av
ar
trails were mapped tomorrow together

m
15
La
Nall Avenue

for greater
Comment clarity and
Types Existing Turkey Creek Trail Streamway
Park W 51st St.
understanding. That Transportation Idea 25 10.3%
map can Lessbe viewed
Bicycle access up
of This Bike Facility hill on Lamar Water Works
Connect
to the far right. Sustainability Idea 24 9.9% needed Park
Streamway Park
with Nall Avenue
Bicycle access needed
along Metcalf - connect to
Sustainability Favorite Place 15 6.2% Turkey Creek Trail
ce Trail Idea Idea W 55th St.
Sidewalk Idea 13 5.4% Connect Rock

Mark Strang Line route
Sidewalk Idea Transportation with signage / markers

s
Creek Trail with Broadmoor / historical trail
Idea Less of this 11 4.5%
Turkey Creek Trail Park
WEBSITE MAPPING Trail

TOOL
Create north spur
for Rock Creek
Idea 9 3.7% Trail needed
along east side of
Trail Existing Rock Creek Trail
North HS Johnson Drive
ky
Pw

LL COMMENTS - 242 Table 1 - Total Comments by Comment Type
Pearl Harbor
on
Park
si
is
M
e
TOTAL 242 100.0%

ne
Victor X Andersen
aw
Park
Sh
bsite were able to leave Comment Type Count Share Need safe bicycle

crossing at
ons of the City of Mission.

W 61st Street
Idea 116 47.9%

Bike Facility
Source: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the
TRANSPORTATION
IDEASustainability Favorite Place 15 6.2% Metcalf Avenue - Metcalf / W 56th Street intersection Add ‘no parking’ signs within 30 feet of stop sign on both sides of the road
Idea is an issue. Either make it a true intersection or extend for 62nd Terrace, north of Shawnee Mission Parkway. Issues with visibility.
10.3% of total comments the merge lanes for safe merging.
Sidewalk Idea 13 5.4% Shawnee Mission Parkway and Nall intersection is dangerous. Consider
ea Transportation Metcalf and W 58th Street is dangerous. Extend merge complete strategies to improve safety / slow down traffic.
Idea Less of this 11 4.5% lane onto Metcalf.
Transit - Add fans / heaters to the transit center to make more comfortable
Metcalf and Johnson Drive should be a gateway into during extreme weather.
Trail Idea 9 3.7% Mission. Bring Metcalf down to grade and install
welcome signage. Add a bike share rack at the transit center.
BIke Facility 4 1.7% tomorrow together
S - 242 15 Metcalf and Johnson Drive extremely dangerous for
pedestrians and cyclists. Needs improvements.
Support frequent and weekend service to Downtown KC!
TOTAL 242 100.0% Other Comments - Make the Mission Village neighborhood a “car-free”
Need safer access from Martway Street to Metcalf or “car-lite” area where the streets would be open to bikes and pedestrians
Avenue - northbound. and safer for children to play.
ment Types
Work with Overland Park to bring Metcalf / Shawnee Extend Johnson Drive improvements west of Lamar. Area is a miss-match
Mission Parkway down to grade. Easier for drivers, of things, has a lot of driveways, narrow sidewalks and a variety of lighting.
pedestrians and provide land for development.
Crosswalk needed at W 67th St and Lamar Avenue to safely connect the
W 61st Street, near the post office, is in poor condition. neighborhoods with Mowhawk Park.
A safe bike and walking route would be nice to connect
to the Rock Creek Trail and Metcalf. Speed bumps on Nall Drive could prevent non-residents from using this
as a shortcut between Nall Avenue and W 67th St.
Shawnee Mission Parkway - Add left turn lane at
Outlook Road. Enhancements need at Roeland Drive.
Need more accessible and visible parking at Streamway Park.
People often cross on foot over Shawnee Mission
Parkway at Outlook Road - dangerous. Would love to I-35 / Lamar Avenue interchange is very dangerous and difficult to navigate.
see a tunnel or bridge at this location. Left turns onto Lamar are problematic. Off-ramp needs to be paved.
tomorrow together vision statement
Vision Statements- identify the overriding aspirations of the community in a district way to be
used as a criteria for decision-making and goals framework
“ The City of Mission, Kansas is an inviting, sustainable and inclusive city that genuinely embraces
people of all ages and backgrounds, respects and nurtures healthy environments and puts
people first. We are a vital connection point for easy access to the entire metro area and we
recognize our important role as a connector of people and places and prosperity.
Our citizens benefit from our unique position in the metro area and our commitment
to providing a quality of life that is distinctly different from other cities. We do this by
emphasizing and constantly improving our walkable neighborhoods and diverse housing
options. We encourage continued growth and economic development of our eclectic
downtown that respects its history, scale and authentic character. We invest in sustainable
practices for our public infrastructure, parks and trails. We connect our neighborhoods and
businesses with multi-modal transportation options with special consideration for all ages and
incomes. Our continuing commitment to these key principles relies on the active and ever-
improving civic involvement of our residents and a shared focus on Tomorrow Together.
We look forward to and embrace the many changes we will experience in the 21st century and
plan ahead of time for new technologies and opportunities that will connect our residents and “
protect and prolong our quality of life. Mission is a great place to grow up and grow old.
what
tomorrow
is a comprehensive
together 4.0 Natural Features + Environment
plan?
4.0 Natural Features & Environment
Continue the investment in Rock Creek flood abatement and storm water infrastructure,
GOAL 1 prioritizing green solutions and BMPs wherever possible. Prioritize public safety and
protecting the environment.
Integrate sustainable practices in development and redevelopment opportunities using a

GOAL 2
sustainability “lens” and criterion where appropriate in all City decisions.
Green Roof - Residential Rain Garden / Bioretention
GOAL 3 Review and implement Mission-appropriate strategies from the KC Climate Action Plan.
As a land-locked community, encourage both commercial and residential development

GOAL 4
redevelopment projects to include greenspace and protect the tree canopy.
Enhance the City’s efforts to routinely evaluate the health of Street Trees, developing a Detention Pond Rain Garden
GOAL 5
long-term strategy for replacements and additions.
GOAL 6 Plant more trees, protect natural ecosystems and use appropriate native plant species.
Green Roof - Commercial Bioretention Facility Permeable Pavers
what
tomorrow
is a comprehensive
together 5.0 Parks + Recreation
plan?
5.0 Parks & Recreation
Maintain and preserve existing open space and natural features to enhance the character
GOAL 1 of the built environment, promote neighborhood stability, public health and safety and
provide for outdoor recreation and visual enjoyment.
Explore opportunities to increase parks and recreational spaces that provide for outdoor
GOAL 2
activities, gathering spaces, and pedestrian and bicycle trails.
Invest in ongoing maintenance and park enhancements, including restrooms, playground

GOAL 3 Mission Farm + Flower Market Legacy Park
equipment, seating options and other amenities.
Ensure that parks and recreational spaces are compliant with ADA standards and
GOAL 4
accommodate residents and visitors of all ages and abilities.
GOAL 5 New or newly redeveloped public spaces should strive to include Universal Design Features.
Sylvester Powell Jr. Community Center Example trail signage
Parks Acres
Andersen Park 4.5
Broadmoor Park 4.9
Mohawk Park 7.8
Legacy Park .43
Park on Beverly .43
Pearl Harbor Park .15
Streamway Park 18.3
Waterworks Park 6.8
TOTAL 43.31 acres
Level of Service Analysis Total
Existing Park Acres 43.31
Existing Population (2019) 9,523
Level of Service
Total Park Acres / 1,000 4.55
residents
TOTAL 43.31 acres
what
tomorrow
is a comprehensive
together 6.0 Transportation + Mobility
plan?
6.0 Transportation & Mobility
Incorporation of public
GOAL 1 Prioritize pedestrian safety as a high priority, especially on Johnson Drive and downtown. Increased ridership and
and private sector Revitalization of
associated revenue
engagement and neighborhoods
gains for transit systems
investment
Plan for a multi-modal transportation/mobility system citywide that will support evolving
technology improvements in the future, such as electric cars, automated vehicles,
GOAL 2
specialized transport services (including privately owned ride-share and delivery services), Transit Oriented Economic returns to
A larger supply of
public rental bicycles, etc. affordable housing Developments
surrounding landowners
and businesses
Develop a flexible transportation plan that allows the City to adapt to future needs within
GOAL 3
established criteria for safety, efficiency, traffic movement and mobility-challenged access. Congestion relief
Improved safety for Improved and enhanced
pedestrians and cyclists public right-of-way
and associated
through non-motorized in vicinity of new
environmental benefits
infrastructure development
Tie current and future mobility plans to the City’s economic development and neighborhood
GOAL 4
protection strategies.
Recognize Johnson Drive as a major connection for local and metropolitan residents. Slow
GOAL 5
traffic at key points and provide more and better marked crosswalks for pedestrians.
Coordinate with MARC, ATA, and surrounding communities to support local or regional
GOAL 6 transportation plans and incorporate updated transit technology regarding transit facilities,
transit routes, micro-transit options, and electric and automated vehicles and street cars.
Explore the feasibility of reconfiguring the Johnson Drive and Metcalf Avenue crossing to
GOAL 7 become an at-grade signalized intersection to encourage economic development activity
and improved access to Downtown Mission.
Explore future public street alignments within Mission’s West Gateway to enhance access,
GOAL 8
connectivity and redevelopment efforts.
what
tomorrow
is a comprehensive
together 7.0 Economic Revitalization
plan?
7.0 Economic Revitalization
Recognize and reinforce the Johnson Drive Corridor as a vital, longstanding retail district
GOAL 1
within Mission through continued public and private investment.
Promote a mixture of office, retail, and residential uses (mixed-uses) along the Johnson
GOAL 2
Drive commercial corridor of the City. First-Floor Gym Space First-Floor Co-working Work-Live Units
Promote a sustainable, diverse economy that positively impacts the health equity of the
GOAL 3
community.
Promote consistent public identity at city gateways by incorporating creative entry-ways as

GOAL 4
part of renewed efforts for redevelopment.
Encourage thoughtful, quality development and redevelopment without compromising the

GOAL 5
unique character of Mission’s residential and commercial districts.
Build on the success of the Johnson Drive Corridor Improvement project. This area with
GOAL 6 large sidewalks, friendly neighbor interactions, and local shops creates the unique mixture
of charm and practicality that resonates with citizens and visitors.
Protect the character, scale and authenticity of Downtown in both new/infill development
GOAL 7
and redevelopment to keep it healthy and thriving.
Incentivize and encourage property owners to refresh facades of buildings and outdated
Time to
GOAL 8 store fronts on Johnson Drive potentially through the use of City grants or other special Provider Speed Type
Download 1GB
Availability
programs. 2,000
Google Fiber Fiber 4s 99.9%
Mbps
Consolidated 1,000
Fiber 8s 49.5%
Communications Mbps
Incorporate new technologies for broadband access city-wide and Smart City strategies to
GOAL 9 IPBB
provide easy access to information for residents, businesses, visitors and stakeholders. AT&T Internet 949 Mbps and 8s 99.3%
Fiber
1,000
Spectrum Cable 8s 100.0%
Ensure participation by all appointed groups and their advisory roles in decision-making, Mbps
1,000 DSL and
as it pertains to commercial development and redevelopment, park enhancements, and EarthLink 8s 99.3%
GOAL 10 Mbps Fiber
walkability, in accordance with the City Council’s adopted policies and the group’s defined 1,000
purposes. Viasat Internet Satelite 1m 21s 100.0%
Mbps
Consolidated
100 Mbps Cable 1m 21s 6.2%
Communications
HughesNet 25 Mbps Satelite 5m 27s 100.0%
what
tomorrow
is a comprehensive
together 8.0 Housing + Neighborhoods
plan?
8.0 Housing + Neighborhoods
Promote sustainable and compatible development and redevelopment of single-family and
FIRST SUBURBS COALITION

GOAL 1
multi-family housing options.
Encourage residential revitalization as the housing stock in Mission continues to age and
GOAL 2
market demands change.
IDEA BOOK
2005
Updating Post-World War Homes
Enact transitional land use policies and development standards to reduce the potential
GOAL 3 impact higher density development may have on existing, lower-density residential Being a Good Neighbor
Overview of Property Maintenance Codes for Residential Properties
Storage shed – Permit required if over 120 sq. ft.
No permit required if 120 sq. ft. or less and no
properties.
greater than 8 feet in height. Zoning
requirements must always be met.
Any tree, shrub or limbs projecting

beyond the back of the curb line or the Recreational vehicles must be
usual location thereof at a point less parked in an enclosed structure
Pools that can hold 12 or
than 12 feet above the street level and/ such as a garage, or the side or
more inches of water
or less than 8 feet above a sidewalk rear yard, behind the front
must be enclosed with a
are deemed to be hazardous. building line and be suitably
fence. A permit is
screened from view.
required to install a pool.
Do not allow Decks exceeding 200 square feet,
Promote quality redevelopment trends, enhancing and promoting a positive citywide image
garbage or debris more than 30 inches above grade
to accumulate on at any point, or attached to the
GOAL 4
the property. dwelling require a permit.
of Mission in both residential and commercial areas. A 3 foot clear space

The maximum height of a fence in the
rear yard shall be 6 feet. The smooth
shall be maintained (finished) side of the fence must face
around the the neighboring property. Electric,
circumference of a fire barbed wire, razor ribbon, livestock or
hydrant. other similar fencing is prohibited. The
installation of a fence requires a permit.
No waste or recyclable material
shall be placed in front of the
building line earlier than 6:00 p.m. Vehicles not properly licensed or in an
the night before collection. inoperable condition must be stored inside or
removed from the premises.
Keep the sidewalk, abutting Grass (or weeds) Vehicles cannot be parked on unimproved
your property, free of snow, exceeding 8 inches in surfaces in the yard; and cannot be parked in
ice and mud/debris. height is a code violation. the street right-of-way.
GOAL 5 Continue emphasis on “code enforcement” on unkempt properties. This is an overview only of some of the code requirements pertaining to residential property maintenance.
For additional information about code enforcement contact the Neighborhood Services Department
913.676.8360
THANK YOU FOR BEING A GOOD NEIGHBOR AND TAKING PRIDE IN MAINTAINING YOUR HOME AND PROPERTY
Add “Missing Middle“ zones to address infill development to support transitions between
GOAL 6
land uses abutting and single-family neighborhoods.
GOAL 7 Develop a specific ongoing strategy to protect and expand affordable housing in Mission.
GOAL 8 Develop criteria and standards to allow Accessory Dwelling Units where appropriate.
what is a comprehensive
tomorrow together plan?
9.0 Infrastructure Maintenance + Enhancements
9.0 Infrastructure Maintenance + Enhancements
Ensure long-range capital planning evaluates and addresses current and anticipated
GOAL 1
development needs in Mission.
Focus on primary infrastructure issues first - streets, sidewalks, curb and gutter, stormwater
GOAL 2
needs, bridges, etc.
Continue to inventory existing conditions for maintenance and replacement as part of a

GOAL 3
comprehensive asset management plan.
GOAL 4 Coordinate improvements with other planned utility maintenance, repair or replacement.
Consider people-oriented improvements, improved district signage, streetscape, outdoor

GOAL 5
sidewalk use, crosswalks and neighborhood needs as part of capital infrastructure planning.
Streetlights
Public Transit
Sidewalk
Curb and Gutter

Crosswalk
ADA Ramps
Drainage
tomorrow together Existing Land Use
Existing Land Use
The Existing Land Use Map illustrates the current
land use of parcels in Mission. This information
is based on county assessor data and may not
match the current zoning of a property or reflect
any current construction activity.
The most common land uses in Mission today

include low-density residential (50.2%), high-
density residential (11.0%), and commercial (8.8%).
Under Development
LEGEND
Mission City Limits
Parcel
Commercial
Office
Parks and Recreation

Light Industrial/ Industrial
0 0.25 0.5 miles N
north
tomorrow together Proposed Future Land Use
Proposed Future Land Use
The Proposed Future Land Use Map illustrates
the ideal future land uses envisioned for Mission.
The land use designation may not match the
existing use or zoning of a given property but
reflects the desired land use should the property
be redeveloped. The primary land use remains
low-density residential, which is not uncommon
for a suburban community like Mission. As a
landlocked community, the growth for Mission is
based on infill development and redevelopment.
Form Based Code District
Under Development
*
LEGEND
Mission City Limits
Parcel
Mixed-Use Medium-Density
Mixed-Use High-Density
Form Based District
Commercial
Office
Parks and Pathways

Business Park/ Light Industrial
0 0.25 0.5 miles N
north
tomorrow together Strategic Opportunities Map
Strategic Opportunities Map
The Strategic Opportunities Map visualizes a
set of place-specific recommendations for the Gateways + Wayfinding
community that are referenced throughout the Mission should consider enhancing
entire Tomorrow Together Comprehensive Plan. community gateways and identify new
These recommendations assist in enhancing the wayfinding signage opportunities to
direct residents and visitor to Mission
guiding principles and the goals associated with
destinations
each of those.
Multi-Family Housing Possible Nall Ave Extension

Explore incentive programs for existing Mission should consider supporting the
Apartment Development to encourage possible extension of Nall Avenue to the
re-investment in amenities, revitalization north into Kansas City, Kansas, as well as
and upkeep of affordable housing the potential to link the Foxridge Drive
options within the community. and Roe Avenue.
Metcalf Ave Improvements

Mission should encourage trail
acquisition and construction along with
streetscape improvements along the
Metcalf Corridor.
Mixed-Use Development
Mixed-use areas shown along Johnson
Drive and Martway Street.
Form Based Code
Explore opportunities
to promote larger scale
redevelopment of properties
in the northern portions of the
Form Based District for new
residential housing and mixed-
use development that takes
advantage of Metcalf frontage
while providing a stronger base
to support retail activity along
Johnson Drive.
Rock Creek Trail Improvements

Explore green infrastructure opportunities for
functionality, enhancement and beautification
along the Rock Creek corridor.
Complete Streets
There is a need for additional
streetscape enhancements
on various corridors with the
possibility of Complete Street
integration the City should Shawnee Mission
further explore in the future. Pkwy/ 63rd St
Improvements
Mission should explore
opportunities for a multi-
jurisdictional corridor
study of Shawnee Mission
Parkway / West 63rd Street
to address integrated
transit/transportation/trail
connectivity/enhancements
and aesthetics/and land use.
tomorrow together Land Use Definitions
Future Land Use Definitions
The Future Land Use Plan includes several different land use categories. The definitions for each are below.
Low-Density Residential Business Park / Light

Uses: Detached Single-family Industrial
residential, single-family residential Typical medium or large-scale
bi-attached, single-family office and light industrial uses
residential + 1 accessory dwelling
unit, civic uses, schools and Density: 0.30 FAR
churches
Density: 3 to 6 dwelling units / acre
Rowhouse / Townhome Mixed-Use

Residential Uses: Pedestrian-friendly mix of
Uses: Single-family residential housing, office and retail uses at
horizontally attached (townhomes, medium densities
rowhouses) and single-family
residential detached Density: 3.0 to 10.0 FAR for retail /
office and 50+ dwelling units / acre
Density: 6 to 18 dwelling units / acre for residential
Multi-Family Residential Mixed-Use Downtown

Uses: Vertically attached residential Uses: Special mixed-use district
(apartments / condos) and single- for the Downtown Johnson Drive
family residential horizontally corridor with typical uses including
attached (townhomes and retail and office on first-floor and
rowhouses) residential uses on the upper floors
Density: 18 or more dwelling units / Density: 1.0 to 3.0 FAR for retail /
acre office and 12 to 45 dwelling units /
acre for residential
Commercial Parks & Pathways

Uses: Typical retail uses such as Parks, recreation land and trail
sales or services, hotels / motels and areas
restaurants
Density: 0.25 FAR
Office Public / Semi-Public

Office uses, typically serving as Government-owned land, schools,
a transition from residential to churches, museums, institutions
commercial uses
Density: 0.25 FAR

Tomorrow Together Public Open House Boards

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Tomorrow Together Public Open House Boards

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Welcome!

Scan this QR code to learn more about

Station 1 Station 2 Station 3 Station 4 Station 5

C. Informational Tool D. Marketing Material

tomorrow together project schedule

HOUSEHOLDS IN MISSION HOUSEHOLDS INCOMES

Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2019 ACS 5-Year Estimates

Parks and Recreation

EXISTING LAND USE

Mission City Limits

Medium Density Residential Office Parks and Recreation

Mission City Limits

Mission City Limits

Mission City Limits

Mission City Limits

Monthly Costs for Renters (2019)

Data from 2018 ACS 5-year Estimates $1,182

Median Monthly Housing Costs (2019): $1,205 Overland

46.7% Roeland Johnson KC

POST CARD EXERCISE

KEY STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS

TRANSPORTATION AND REPUTATION AND CITY ADMINISTRATION AND

STRENGTHS STRENGTHS STRENGTHS STRENGTHS STRENGTHS

High 59.6% Improve 68.5%

Very high 18.4% Not sure 7.2%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

Nothing 43 “I am living in my dream home” 29.6%

“My house fits my needs right now, but

Stop Locations 42 “I am living in an apartment now, but

“I would like to stay in my home in Mission, but will likely

DESIRED AMENITIES SURVEY

Walking / Biking Trails 58 Enhancements to Parks 60

Dog Park 53 Walkability Enhancements 59

Food Truck Area 29

Outdoor Fitness Equipment 25

Athletic Fields / Courts 22

Priority items by total votes

Investment categories and their associated costs Streetscape Improvements 42

Priority items by total allocated funding

Most Preferred Neutral

public input review

Neutral Preferred Less

INTERACTIVE WEBSITE INTERACTIVE WEBSITE

- Preference seems to be for remodeling / rehabilitating existingPARKBasement

with an activated street front SIGNAGE

Dog park 40 Formal Garden 14 STREETSCAPE ENHANCEMENTS Gateway Option P 20 VISUAL

VISUAL PREFERENCE EXERCISE

Green Infrastructure 57 Oversized Planters 29

Sculptural Bus Stop Linear Park 32 TOTAL 318

IDEA Comment Types

INTERACTIVE WEBSITE MAPPING TOOL

Table 1 - Total Comments by Comment

INTERACTIVE WEBSITE MAPPING TOOL

ACTIVE WEBSITE MAPPING TOOL MAP COMMENTS

Consider adding curbside leaf pickup as a city service.

Maybe the Gateway site is better positioned as a large

ACTIVE WEBSITE MAPPING TOOL Green Infrastructure - Diminish impervious surfaces

Table 1 - Total Comments by Comment Type

Transportation Idea 25 10.3%

Trail Idea 9 3.7% Johnson Drive B

Figure 1 - All Comment Types

ACTIVE WEBSITE MAPPING TOOL

MENTS Downtown Mission