Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TTL1 Activity 8 (LOBERIANO)
TTL1 Activity 8 (LOBERIANO)
ENGAGE
4 PICS-ONE WORD
Guess the letters which would name the set of photos. Only one word will
describe the four photos. Write your answer on the blanks provided
D R A M A FIELD TRIP
EXTEND
1. Research further on the myth about Edgar Dale's Cone of
Experience. What are the arguments against the myths about the cone of
experience?
Based on the information that I gathered from the internet, there are
several arguments provided by researchers in psychology that debunked the
myths on Dale's Cone of Experience. I've only included some of their arguments
which are presented below;
The original graphical presentation of Edgar Dale's Cone of Experience as
developed in 1946 did not include percentages on every level, nor did he
mentioned any learning outcomes in the model. He hadn't based his cone on any
scientific research, which he explicitly mentioned in his study, besides urging
his readers to "not take it seriously". Moreover, there have been several
adaptations of his model where people have come up with a variety of versions
that are inconsistent with the original "Cone of Experience". Hence,
deteriorating the credibility of the model in the present due to the misleading
and falsified information that were created by other people.
There is no body of research that supports the data presented in the many
forms of the retention chart. That is, there is no scientific data—or other data
—that supports the claim that people remember some percentage of what they
learned. Interestingly, where people have relied on research citations from
1943, 1947, 1963, and 1967 as the defining research when they cite the source
of their data, the numbers—10%, 20%, 30% and so on— actually appeared as
early as 1914 and 1922—when they were presented as information long known.
The fact that the data in the retention chart of Dale's "Cone of Experience"
are divisible by 5 or 10 makes it obvious to anyone who has done research that
these are not numbers derived by actual research. Human variability precludes
round numbers. In addition, as pointed out as early at 1978 by Dwyer, there is
the question of how the data were derived—what were learners actually asked
to do? Note for example that the retention chart data always measures—among
other things—how much people remember by reading, hearing, and seeing. How
people could read without seeing is an obvious confusion. What are people doing
when they only see and don’t read or listen? Also problematic is how you’d
create a fair test to compare situations where learners listened or watched
something. Are they tested on different tests (one where they see and one
where they listen), which seems to allow bias or are they tested on the same
test, in which case on group would be at a disadvantage because they aren’t
taking a test in the same context in which they learned.
ESSAY:
When I was in the 9th grade in High School, there was a terror teacher
that I've met which just a single glance on her will make my knees tremble
because of her cold demeanor and sullen expression. The subject that she was
assigned to teach in my class was mathematics, one of my weakest areas that
time as I feared those complex and long mathematical formulas. I was so
shocked when I learned that she will be my mathematics teacher within the
school year and I don't know if I can survive this term because of my
underperformance in problemsolving. When she already started her Math class,
I didn't noticed that I was paying attention to her discussion with focus, not
because of my fear to be reprimanded for not listening but because the way she
teach is simply easy to understand. The way she explained math concepts are
intriguing and fascinating which evokes my curiosity to learn more. Afterwards,
I began practicing at solving math problems at home and watched many tutorial
math videos to enhance my math skills. At first, I simply laughed at myself on
why I am doing these things, but I remembered my math teacher and I realized
that I was motivated by her to become proficient in this subject. Back to the
school, my math teacher gave us a summative test and I know that I am well
prepared because I studied all the topics that will be covered on this
assessment. But despite of my efforts that I put on reviewing, I still failed to
meet my expectations. I wasn't able to get a good score and thought to myself
that maybe I am not just capable to learn in Mathematics. However, my Math
teacher still commended those who tried their best to pass the test. She said
that it is okay to fail because this will help us to become better in the future.
"Just like trial and error in solving a math problem, don't give up and keep trying
until we can find the correct solution.", she added. Those words inspired and
motivated me to continue learning mathematics amidst of the numerous
challenges I encountered along my path.
References:
https://www.worklearning.com/2015/01/05/mythical-retention-data-
thecorrupted-cone/
https://lidtfoundations.pressbooks.com/chapter/edgar-dale-and-the-cone-
ofexperience/