REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES

COLLEGE OF INDUSTRIAL EDUCATION
PROFESSIONAL INDUSTRIAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
Manila

Name: Renz Suaze Date:

Course & Sec: BTVTEd-EST-3A Topic: Principles of Research Ethics

Engagement Activity # 2
Research Design /
Academic Dishonesty
General Direction: Please read and complete this activity. Read and comprehend the instructions
provided on each task and do it scholarly and diligently.

Determine the Design

Determine the research design of the following research topic / title.

1. Internet availability at home and student’s average sleeping time at night

Answer: Experimental research design

2. Social media involvement and practices of 3rd year BSIE/BTVTEd students

Answer: Diagnostic research design

3. The effect of the use of <a local packaging material> on the shelf life of a product.
Answer: Descriptive research design

4. The marketability of <innovative product> to BSIE/BTVTEd students.

Answer: Experimental research design

5. Children of single parents and their level of Math anxiety.

Answer: Correlational research design
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES
COLLEGE OF INDUSTRIAL EDUCATION
PROFESSIONAL INDUSTRIAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
Manila

Have you ever cheated in exam? YES

Try to reflect. Answer the given questions with full honesty and integrity. Your answers will be confidential
and will only use for this activity only.

WHEN?
Last sem

WHERE?
In exam

WHY?
Because i didn’t review

HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT IT?

It’s okay because it part of being student for me because nobody’s perfect.
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES
COLLEGE OF INDUSTRIAL EDUCATION
PROFESSIONAL INDUSTRIAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
Manila

Rubrics:

Criteria Superior (5 points) Sufficient (4points) Minimal (3 points) Unacceptable (2

points)

Depth of Response demonstrates Response demonstrates a Response Response

Reflection an in-depth reflection general reflection on, demonstrates a demonstrates a lack
on, and personalization and personalization of, minimal reflection of reflection on, or
of, the theories, the theories, concepts, on, and personalization of, the
concepts, and/or and/or strategies personalization of, theories, concepts,
strategies presented in presented in the course the theories, and/or strategies
the course materials to materials to date. concepts, and/or presented in the
date. Viewpoints and Viewpoints and strategies presented course materials to
interpretations are interpretations are in the course date. Viewpoints and
insightful and well supported. Appropriate materials to date. interpretations are
supported. Clear, examples are provided, Viewpoints and missing,
detailed examples are as applicable. interpretations are inappropriate, and/or
provided, as applicable. unsupported or unsupported.
supported with Examples, when
flawed arguments. applicable, are not
Examples, when provided.
applicable, are not
provided or are
irrelevant to the
assignment.
Structure Writing is clear, Writing is mostly clear, Writing is unclear Writing is unclear and
concise, and well concise, and well and/or disorganized. disorganized.
organized with organized with good Thoughts are not Thoughts ramble and
excellent sentence/paragraph expressed in a make little sense.
sentence/paragraph construction. Thoughts logical manner. There are numerous
construction. Thoughts are expressed in a There are more than spelling, grammar, or
are expressed in a coherent and logical five spelling, syntax errors
coherent and logical manner. There are no grammar, or syntax throughout the
manner. There are no more than five spelling, errors per page of response.
more than three grammar, or syntax writing.
spelling, grammar, or errors per page of
syntax errors per page writing.
of writing.

Adopted: https://web.uri.edu/assessment/files/reflection_rubric.doc