Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5G Timing and Synchronization
5G Timing and Synchronization
5G Timing and Synchronization
5G TIMING AND
SYNCHRONIZATION
1 Concepts of Time
2 Impact of 5G
3 5G Timing and Synchronization Solutions
Topics
4 Testing 5G Timing and Synchronization
5 Summary
6 Questions
© 2019 EXFO Inc. All rights reserved. 2
Concepts of Time
ORDER OF &
DURATION OF SYCHRONIZATION OF EVENTS
EVENTS
UTC Epoch
Number of seconds since
00:00:00 1 Jan 1970
GNSS
Global Navigation Satellite System
GPS Epoch
Number of seconds since
00:00:00 6 Jan 1980 © 2020 EXFO Inc. 20200198 6
Measurement of Time
Accurate PreciseStable
(Repeatable) Accurate Not accurate
&&Precise
Stable (but not accurate) (but
(butnot
notprecise)
stable) or
orprecise
stable
2x
B B
1x
E E
Sequence F C F C
1x
A B C D E F A B C D E F 2x C C
1x
Ethernet
Duration F F
Cost ✓
Management ✓
Efficiency ✓ © 2020 EXFO Inc. 20200198 10
Evolution towards 5G (North America)
RRH
RU
GPS
Node B
CU BBU
eNodeB
DU
Midhaul
Backhaul Coax
CPRI
eCPRI
TE (relative):
<1us TE (absolute): 1.1us
RU Fronthaul
TE (absolute): 1.5us
GNSS Issues
• Too expensive to implement in every location
Ref
Clock
Ethernet Synchronous Message Channel (ESMC)
Sync
t0
Follow up
t1
Delay Request t2
Ref t3
Clock
t4 Delay Response
t5
T-BC T-TC
Ref
Clock
GPS
PRTC
T-TSC T-GM
T-BC T-BC T-BC T-BC
GPS
PRTC
T-TSC T-GM
T-BC T-BC T-BC T-BC
Potential Issues
Too many hops
Excess Packet Delay Variation
Congestion
Rerouting
© 2020 EXFO Inc. All rights reserved. 19
Moving Clocks Closer to the Edge
GPS GPS
PTP Slave
T-GM
PTP
CESR
GrandMaster
Carrier Ethernet
Network
T-BC
Node B
eNode B
Small Cells
PTP Slave PTP Slave PTP Slave © 2020 EXFO Inc. 20200198 20
Testing 5G Timing and
Synchronization
1 DU CU
Junction Box
Towards RU Towards DU
FIP FIP
OTDR OTDR
CPRI/eCPRI BERT SyncE (Reception)
SyncE (Reflection) PTP (Reception)
© 2017 EXFO Inc. All rights reserved. 23
Testing Configuration – Cell Site Installation
Click to add text
Option 2 Testing
RU
DU
Backhaul
Midhaul
IP/Ethernet
F1/Ethernet
1 2 CU
Junction Box
Towards RU Towards CU
FIP FIP
OTDR OTDR
EtherBERT EtherBERT
SyncE (Reflection) SyncE (Reception)
PTP (Reception)
© 2017 EXFO Inc. All rights reserved. 24
SyncE Field Testing Results
SyncE
• Simple connection
Is SyncE running?
• Short test duration
Is the clock quality • Easy to interpret results
level correct.
• Easy to debug
Is the frequency
correct and stable?
IEEE1588/PTP
Correct GM?
• Simple connection
Packet Delay Variation • Short test duration
Acceptable?
• Easy to interpret results
• Easy to debug
Clock Quality
is as expected?
Is PTP working?
Wander GPS
Antenna
• Simple connection
1PPS
• Long test duration
• Skill to interpret results
MTIE
• Skill and Access Ref
mask
Clock
required to debug
MTIE
TDEV
Contractor procedures need to include testing of PTP and SyncE services as part
of handover package.
EXFO’s 1588 PTP validates EXFO’s SyncE application Wander/TE delivers all the test
1588 PTP packet network validates SyncE frequency, results (TE, MTIE, TDEV)
synchronization services, ESMC messages and clock required in order to diligently
supports G.8265.1, G.8275.1 quality levels. evaluate the reference signal/
and G.8275.2 profiles. clock during turn-up or
troubleshooting at cell tower
locations
© 2019 EXFO Inc. All rights reserved. 31
USE
CASE 3 Timing & sync troubleshooting
RESULT
ITU-T G.8261 - Timing and Synchronization Aspects in Packet Networks, Feb 2008.
ITU-T G.8262 - Timing Characteristics of SyncE Equipment Slave Clock, Aug 2007.
ITU-T G.8264 - Distribution of Timing Through Packet Networks, Feb 2008
ITU-T G.813 - Clock Model
ITU-T G.8275.1 - Full Timing Support
ITU-T G.8275.2 - Partial Timing Support
ITU-T G.8273.2 - Eqpt Time Error Limits
Wander GPS
Antenna
• Simple connection
1PPS
• Long test duration
• Skill to interpret results
MTIE
• Skill and Access Ref
mask
Clock
required to debug
MTIE
TDEV
01:23:42.034614314
1 Assessing MTIE and TDEV using PTP input and Slave tester is futile
PTP Slave in test equipment is different from PTP Slave in DUT
Clock adjustment algorithm in test equipment is different from DUT
Therefore MTIE and TDEV measures have no correlation with DUT
2 Assessing MTIE and TDEV using PTP output and Slave tester is problematic