Professional Documents
Culture Documents
National Standards: Bureau of
National Standards: Bureau of
9488
On Fatigue Failure
by
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Institute for Basic Standards. Applied Mathematics. Electricity. Metrology. Mechanics. Heat.
Atomic Physics. Physical Chemistry. Laboratory Astrophysics.* Radiation Physics. Radio Standards
Laboratory:* Radio Standards Physics; Radio Standards Engineering. Office of Standard Reference
Data.
Institute for Materials Research. Analytical Chemistry, Polymers. Metallurgy. Inorganic Mate-
rials. Reactor Radiations. Cryogenics.* Materials Evaluation Laboratory. Office of Standard Refer-
ence Materials.
Institute for Applied Technology. Building Research. Information Technology. Performance
Test Development. Electronic Instrumentation. Textile and Apparel Technology Center. Technical
Analysis. Office of Weights and Measures. Office of Engineering Standards. Office of Invention and
Innovation. Office of Technical Resources. Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical
Information.**
On Fatigue Failure
Final Report
by
IMPORTANT NOTICE
NATIONAL BUREAU OF ST iss accounting documents intended
for use within the Government, Approved for public release by the subjected to additional evaluation
and review. For this reason, th of this Report, either in
director of the National Institute of ! listing
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
' '
f ‘
-
.2
The Effect of Surface Reactions
On Fatigue Failure
Final Report
Space Administration
S ummar y
of titanium alloy Ti-4Al-4Mn and vacuum melted AlSl 4340 steel were
in four environments; dry helium, dry air, moist helium and moist
air. The fatigue strength of both alloys was lower in moist environ-
Introduction
in both moist and dry air and in both moist and dry helium.
The tensile strength value for the titanium alloy was obtained by
(figure la) and the steel specimens had tapered shanks (figure lb).
0,200 in (0.508cm,).
the final polish being obtained with No. 400 paper. The steel
lubricant, the final polish being obtained with 000 grade paper.
i
3
1 . Dry air
2. Moist air
3. Dry helium
4. Moist helium
through four drying towers containing silica gel and then through
two titanium getters to remove oxygen (maximum oxygen 0.02 mole per
cent).
a ) T i -4A 1 -4Mn
The fatigue results fo;r the titanium alloy specimens are shown
4
fatigue limits with sixteen specimens being used for each con-
moist atmospheres. The slopes of the S-N curves are quite steep.
specimens tested in both moist air and moist helium in the finite
helium and in both moist helium and moist air. There was
In the fatigue limit region, there was only about a six percent
results from tests conducted in dry air were only slightly poorer.
It would appear from the data presented here that the pre-
T i-4Al -4Mn
crack source from the specimen surface and the specimen life.
therefore tend to cloud the effects that are being sought, as one
can say that failure from a surface source would have required a
plotted are the median values for groups of seven specimens tested
for obtaining an estimate of the true median for these sets of data,
for specimens tested in dry helium as one would expect from the
Conclusions
titanium alloy Ti-4Al-4Mn and vacuum melted 4340 steel, but not
to a great extent.
in dry helium.
9
References
Edition) 1963.
USCOMM-NBS-DC
1 e h
Table I. Materials
n 0 . 02
2
75 minutes S 0 001 .
52 R c Si 0 27 .
Ni 1 80 .
Cr 0 77 .
Mo 0 28 .
Cu 0 10 .
V< 0 01.
H 4 . 4ppm
N; 53
0^ 6.3
Kilocycles to fracture
Ksi MN/m‘ Dry Helium Moist Helium Dry Air Moist Air
117 807 38
41
42
51
64
114 786 37
37
38
39
39
112 772 22 20
25 23
26 24
28 29
31 40
109 752 69
72
80
119
148
108 745 47
47
49
60
63
100 689 33 59
50 61
60 71
3837 14658
1
i
r
Table III
99 683 D ry Air 3 0
98 676 8 37.5
97 669 5 80
97 6 69 Moist Air 3 0
96 662 3 100
95 655 4 25
94 64 8 5 80
93 641 1 100
Table IVa
K s i MN/m^ D ry He 1 iu m D ry Air
180 1241 20
26
28
29
32
34
36
128 883 *
5693
*
10057
127 876 >-
S
A
Kilocycles to Fracture
150 1034 40 35
41 36
44 39
50 51
104 98
454 132
2946* 918
130 896 92 52
94 130
105 228
126 683*
189 3855
11103* 7839
18718* 20273*
Figure 1
Fatigue Specimens
^
1 1
i 1 r
r:
r—
<
i
FRACTURE
CD
o
TO
CYCLES
E
c
o
ID
o >
c
£sj
sr
o
oo
— =
o
— co cvj
o
oo
O CT> (J)
4340
of
Strength
Fatigue
on
Environment
of
Effect