Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Regional Positioning System Using Turksat Satellites: June 2013
Regional Positioning System Using Turksat Satellites: June 2013
Regional Positioning System Using Turksat Satellites: June 2013
net/publication/261242333
CITATIONS READS
3 197
5 authors, including:
Ibrahim Oz
Turksat Satellite Communication and Cable Tv Inc.
14 PUBLICATIONS 35 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Ibrahim Oz on 30 March 2018.
Ahmet Fazil Yagli, Mesut Gokten, Senol Gulgonul, Ibrahim Oz, Ozkan Dalbay
R&D and Satellite Design Dept. TURKSAT
Ankara, Turkey
afyagli@turksat.com, mgokten@turksat.com, sgulgonul@turksat.com, ioz@turksat.com, odalbay@turksat.com
I. INTRODUCTION (1)
The determination of position is becoming a (2)
substantial issue in modern world. To get the
position information of a user, there are various The time between the transmitting station and the
alternative methods developed, one of which is user is calculated as shown in (3), where c is the
using geosynchronous (GEO) satellites. GEO speed of light.
satellites have the advantage of wider coverage area
and keeping the same position relative to a user on (3)
Earth. Omnitracs, Euteltracs, and Beidou are widely
known position information providers utilizing For this conceptual study, the payload delays of
GEO satellites [1-3]. General approach to fınd the three satellites are assumed to be the same. The
location coordinates is employing the time distance between one satellite and the user is
difference of arrival (TDOA) of signals coming calculated as in (4). The locations of the three
from each one of several GEO satellites [4-8]. satellites and the altitude of the user are known. The
Turksat has orbital rights at 31o, 42o, and 50o E latitude and longitude coordinates of the user are to
longitude GEO orbits, where a constellation of three be found using two equations. Three locations of
satellites can be designed to offer regional the satellites are chosen according to the orbit rights
positioning service. In accordance to this design, a of Turksat, which are 31o, 42o, and 50o E longitude
conceptual study is performed and the geostationary orbit positions (Fig. 1). The distance
precision/accuracy results are presented in this from the transmitting station and the satellites are
paper. The system consists of three GEO satellites, deducted from the time differences in order to have
a time code signal generator at the transmitting only the traveling time of signal from the satellite to
Earth station and an altimeter at the end user. the end user.
√ (4)
Figure 1. The positions of three satellites and two earth stations.
III. RESULTS AND ERROR ANALYSIS 15 1,25 0,23
20 1,67 0,31
When the user is assumed to be in Ankara, Turkey
25 2,13 0,39
(40o N, 32o E), the written computer code gives
39.9999999999939o N and 31.9999999999981o E
coordinates as the simulation results. Knowing that, Table 2. The position deviation of the user due to
at 40o N latitude, a longitude error of 0.001o refers the error in the latitude information of the satellite
to 111 m of position deviation, the results can be at 31o E.
Deviation error of
seen as highly accurate. Longitude Latitude
the satellite
In satellite communications there can occur some deviation (m) deviation (m)
towards North (m)
computation error due to various factors. These 1 4,02 0,74
errors affecting the position knowledge of the
2 8,04 1,48
satellites can dramatically disturb the correct
3 12,07 2,22
position information of the end user. In our three
4 16,09 2,97
satellite system, we introduced some error in our
code to investigate the magnitude of the deviation in 5 20,11 3,71
the position of the user due to the amount of the
error inserted. Table 3. The position deviation of the user due to
First, we assumed an error in the longitude, latitude the error in the radial distance information of the
and radial distance information of one of the satellite at 31o E.
satellites (31o E). The deviation in the position due Deviation error
in the radial Longitude Latitude
to the position error of only one satellite is given in
distance of the deviation (m) deviation (m)
Tables 1, 2 and 3. satellite (m)
1 36,57 6,74
Table 1. The position deviation of the user due to 2 73,14 13,48
the error in the longitude information of the satellite 3 109,71 20,22
at 31o E.
4 146,27 26,96
Deviation error
Longitude Latitude 5 182,84 33,70
of the satellite
deviation (m) deviation (m)
towards East (m)
5 0,42 0,08 As can be seen from the Tables 1, 2 and 3, the
10 0,84 0,16 major deviation factor is the error in the radial
distance information. Assuming all three satellites
having the same amount of radial distance error, the Table 5. The position deviation of the user due to
deviation increases rapidly with increasing radial the error in the radial distance information of three
distance error, which is tabulated in Table 4. satellites.
Altimeter error Longitude Latitude
Table 4. The position deviation of the user due to (m) deviation (m) deviation (m)
the error in the radial distance information of three 1 1,16 0,00
satellites. 2 2,32 0,00
Deviation error 3 3,47 0,00
in the radial Longitude Latitude 4 4,63 0,00
distance of the deviation (m) deviation (m) 5 5,79 0,00
satellites (m)
1 177,51 19,52
The distances between the satellites are also
important for the accurate position calculation. In
2 355,02 39,06
the calculations above the angular distance between
3 532,52 58,59
the satellites is around 10o according to the center of
4 710,02 78,12
the Earth. The case of narrower angular gap is also
5 887,51 97,66 analyzed. When the satellites are located at 41o, 42o
and 43o E longitudes, the position deviation of the
In addition to these analyses, the height information end user is huge compared to the previous
obtained from the user altimeter can be wrong, this configuration. The delay differences when the user
error source is analyzed and the position deviations is at Ankara are plotted in Fig. 2, while the delay
are given in Table 5. differences of the previous satellite constellation are
shown in Fig. 3.
0 0
Delay differences (ms) (User: 40 N, 32 E)
80 0 -0 .1
60 0
0.1 -0 .2
1
-0 .
40
20
0.2
Latitude (0)
-0 .3
0.1
-0.2
0
0
-0 .1
-20
-40
0.1 -0 .
2
-60 0
-0 .1
0
-80
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Longitude (0)
Figure 2. The differences between the delays of the signals coming from three satellites (41o, 42o and 43o E),
when the user is at Ankara.
0 0
Delay differences (ms) (User: 40 N, 32 E)
80 0
-1
60 1
-2
-1
40
0
2
20
-3
1
Latitude (0)
-2
0
-1
-20
2 0
-40 -2
1
-60 -1
0
-80
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Longitude (0)
Figure 3. The differences between the delays of the signals coming from three satellites (31o, 42o and 50o E),
when the user is at Ankara.