Regional Positioning System Using Turksat Satellites: June 2013

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/261242333

Regional Positioning System Using Turksat Satellites

Conference Paper · June 2013


DOI: 10.1109/RAST.2013.6581207

CITATIONS READS

3 197

5 authors, including:

Mesut Gokten Senol Gulgonul


TUBITAK Marmara Research Center Cankaya University
22 PUBLICATIONS   50 CITATIONS    54 PUBLICATIONS   73 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Ibrahim Oz
Turksat Satellite Communication and Cable Tv Inc.
14 PUBLICATIONS   35 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Satellite Transponder Simulation View project

Turksat View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Ibrahim Oz on 30 March 2018.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Regional Positioning System Using Turksat Satellites

Ahmet Fazil Yagli, Mesut Gokten, Senol Gulgonul, Ibrahim Oz, Ozkan Dalbay
R&D and Satellite Design Dept. TURKSAT
Ankara, Turkey
afyagli@turksat.com, mgokten@turksat.com, sgulgonul@turksat.com, ioz@turksat.com, odalbay@turksat.com

Abstract—A Regional positioning system using three


geosynchronous Turksat satellites is investigated in this paper. In II. CALCULATION
this system, a time code signal sent from an earth station to three
geostationary satellites is received by a user on Earth. Time delay Since the equations obtained from time delay
differences from three satellites are measured by the user and are calculations have nonlinear characteristics, it is
used to calculate the user’s position. The user's location necessary to use special methods. In this study an
information includes latitude and longitude coordinates. It is
assumed that the user's altitude is measured by an altimeter. iterative method is used to solve the time delay
calculation equations. Delay formulas can be
Keywords-component; regional positioning, GEO satellite, written as:
Turksat

I. INTRODUCTION (1)
The determination of position is becoming a (2)
substantial issue in modern world. To get the
position information of a user, there are various The time between the transmitting station and the
alternative methods developed, one of which is user is calculated as shown in (3), where c is the
using geosynchronous (GEO) satellites. GEO speed of light.
satellites have the advantage of wider coverage area
and keeping the same position relative to a user on (3)
Earth. Omnitracs, Euteltracs, and Beidou are widely
known position information providers utilizing For this conceptual study, the payload delays of
GEO satellites [1-3]. General approach to fınd the three satellites are assumed to be the same. The
location coordinates is employing the time distance between one satellite and the user is
difference of arrival (TDOA) of signals coming calculated as in (4). The locations of the three
from each one of several GEO satellites [4-8]. satellites and the altitude of the user are known. The
Turksat has orbital rights at 31o, 42o, and 50o E latitude and longitude coordinates of the user are to
longitude GEO orbits, where a constellation of three be found using two equations. Three locations of
satellites can be designed to offer regional the satellites are chosen according to the orbit rights
positioning service. In accordance to this design, a of Turksat, which are 31o, 42o, and 50o E longitude
conceptual study is performed and the geostationary orbit positions (Fig. 1). The distance
precision/accuracy results are presented in this from the transmitting station and the satellites are
paper. The system consists of three GEO satellites, deducted from the time differences in order to have
a time code signal generator at the transmitting only the traveling time of signal from the satellite to
Earth station and an altimeter at the end user. the end user.

√ (4)
Figure 1. The positions of three satellites and two earth stations.
III. RESULTS AND ERROR ANALYSIS 15 1,25 0,23
20 1,67 0,31
When the user is assumed to be in Ankara, Turkey
25 2,13 0,39
(40o N, 32o E), the written computer code gives
39.9999999999939o N and 31.9999999999981o E
coordinates as the simulation results. Knowing that, Table 2. The position deviation of the user due to
at 40o N latitude, a longitude error of 0.001o refers the error in the latitude information of the satellite
to 111 m of position deviation, the results can be at 31o E.
Deviation error of
seen as highly accurate. Longitude Latitude
the satellite
In satellite communications there can occur some deviation (m) deviation (m)
towards North (m)
computation error due to various factors. These 1 4,02 0,74
errors affecting the position knowledge of the
2 8,04 1,48
satellites can dramatically disturb the correct
3 12,07 2,22
position information of the end user. In our three
4 16,09 2,97
satellite system, we introduced some error in our
code to investigate the magnitude of the deviation in 5 20,11 3,71
the position of the user due to the amount of the
error inserted. Table 3. The position deviation of the user due to
First, we assumed an error in the longitude, latitude the error in the radial distance information of the
and radial distance information of one of the satellite at 31o E.
satellites (31o E). The deviation in the position due Deviation error
in the radial Longitude Latitude
to the position error of only one satellite is given in
distance of the deviation (m) deviation (m)
Tables 1, 2 and 3. satellite (m)
1 36,57 6,74
Table 1. The position deviation of the user due to 2 73,14 13,48
the error in the longitude information of the satellite 3 109,71 20,22
at 31o E.
4 146,27 26,96
Deviation error
Longitude Latitude 5 182,84 33,70
of the satellite
deviation (m) deviation (m)
towards East (m)
5 0,42 0,08 As can be seen from the Tables 1, 2 and 3, the
10 0,84 0,16 major deviation factor is the error in the radial
distance information. Assuming all three satellites
having the same amount of radial distance error, the Table 5. The position deviation of the user due to
deviation increases rapidly with increasing radial the error in the radial distance information of three
distance error, which is tabulated in Table 4. satellites.
Altimeter error Longitude Latitude
Table 4. The position deviation of the user due to (m) deviation (m) deviation (m)
the error in the radial distance information of three 1 1,16 0,00
satellites. 2 2,32 0,00
Deviation error 3 3,47 0,00
in the radial Longitude Latitude 4 4,63 0,00
distance of the deviation (m) deviation (m) 5 5,79 0,00
satellites (m)
1 177,51 19,52
The distances between the satellites are also
important for the accurate position calculation. In
2 355,02 39,06
the calculations above the angular distance between
3 532,52 58,59
the satellites is around 10o according to the center of
4 710,02 78,12
the Earth. The case of narrower angular gap is also
5 887,51 97,66 analyzed. When the satellites are located at 41o, 42o
and 43o E longitudes, the position deviation of the
In addition to these analyses, the height information end user is huge compared to the previous
obtained from the user altimeter can be wrong, this configuration. The delay differences when the user
error source is analyzed and the position deviations is at Ankara are plotted in Fig. 2, while the delay
are given in Table 5. differences of the previous satellite constellation are
shown in Fig. 3.
0 0
Delay differences (ms) (User: 40 N, 32 E)
80 0 -0 .1

60 0
0.1 -0 .2
1
-0 .

40

20
0.2
Latitude (0)

-0 .3
0.1

-0.2
0

0
-0 .1

-20

-40
0.1 -0 .
2

-60 0
-0 .1
0
-80
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Longitude (0)

Figure 2. The differences between the delays of the signals coming from three satellites (41o, 42o and 43o E),
when the user is at Ankara.
0 0
Delay differences (ms) (User: 40 N, 32 E)
80 0
-1

60 1
-2

-1
40

0
2

20

-3
1
Latitude (0)

-2
0

-1
-20
2 0

-40 -2
1

-60 -1

0
-80
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Longitude (0)

Figure 3. The differences between the delays of the signals coming from three satellites (31o, 42o and 50o E),
when the user is at Ankara.

The delay contours in Fig. 2 are nearly coinciding,


REFERENCES
which makes the position calculation using the
[1] E. G. Tiedemann, I. M. Jacobs, A.B. Salmasi, and T.J.Bernard, “The
signal delay times very difficult and highly sensitive OmniTRACS mobile satellite communications and positioning system”,
to the errors in the satellite position information. International Congress on Transportation Electronics, pp. 503–507,
1990.
[2] J. N. Colcy, G. Hall, and R. Steinhauser, “Euteltracs: the European
IV. CONCLUSION mobile satellite service”, Electronics & Communication Engineering
Journal, pp. 81–88, April 1995.
Three geostationary satellites assumed to be located
[3] H. Qi, S. Xia, Y. Chen, and J. Dai, “Passive Positioning Algorithm
at the three orbital locations of Turksat are used to Based on Beidou Double-Star”, The Sixth World Congress on Intelligent
estimate the geographic location of a user on Earth. Control and Automation, pp. 1791–1794, 2006.
[4] M. Phatak, M. Chansarkar, and S. Kohli, “Position fix from three GPS
The system is utilizing the time differences of satellites and altitude: a direct method”, IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and
arrivals of the signals coming from each of the Electronic Systems, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 350–354, January 1999.
satellites and the altitude of the user to calculate the [5] K. C. Ho and Y. T. Chan, “Solution and performance analysis of
geolocation by TDOA”, IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic
latitude and longitude of the user. In this paper, the Systems, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 1311–1322, October 1993.
effect of the angular distance between the satellites [6] T. Pattison and S. I. Chou, “Sensitivity analysis of dual-satellite
geolocation”, IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol.
is also investigated. Moreover, the position 36, No. 1, pp. 56–71, January 2000.
deviation due to the possible error in the location [7] K. E. Lee, D. M. Ahn, Y. J. Lee, S. Cho, and J. Chun, “A total least
squares algorithm for the source location estimation using GEO
information of the satellites is analyzed and satellites”, MILCOM 2000 Conf., Vol. 1, pp. 271–275, 2000.
tabulated. [8] X.-Y. Lin and Y.-Z. Zhang, “Performance analysis of passive three
geostationary satellites navigation and position”, The Third International
Conference on Information and Computing, pp. 338–341, 2010.

View publication stats

You might also like