Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chauhan 2012
Chauhan 2012
Chauhan 2012
DOI: 10.1039/c2an35629e
The construction of two amperometric L-lysine biosensors is described in this study. The construction
Downloaded by University of New Hampshire on 24 February 2013
comprises the covalent immobilization of lysine oxidase (LOx) onto nanocomposite composed of gold
nanoparticles (AuNPs) and carboxylated multiwalled carbon nanotubes (c-MWCNT), decorated on (i)
polyaniline (PANI) and (ii) poly 1,2 diaminobenzene (DAB), electrodeposited on Au electrodes. The
biosensors were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared
(FTIR) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) studies. The optimum response (current)
was observed within 2 s at pH 7.0 and 25 C for LOx/AuNPs/c-MWCNT/PANI/Au, and 4 s at pH 7.0
and 30 C for LOx/AuNPs/c-MWCNT/DAB/Au electrodes. There was a linear relationship between
current and lysine concentration ranging from 5.0 to 600 mM for LOx/AuNPs/c-MWCNT/PANI/Au
with a detection limit of 5.0 mM, and 20 to 600 mM for the LOx/AuNPs/c-MWCNT/DAB/Au electrode
with a detection limit of 20 mM. The PANI modified electrode was in good agreement with the standard
HPLC method, with a better correlation (r ¼ 0.992) compared to the DAB modified electrode
(r ¼ 0.986). These observations revealed that the PANI modified Au electrode was better than the DAB
modified electrode, and hence it was employed for the determination of lysine in milk, pharmaceutical
tablets and sera. The PANI modified electrode showed a half life of 120 days, compared to that of
90 days for the DAB modified electrode, after their 100 uses, when stored at 4 C.
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 Analyst, 2012, 137, 5113–5122 | 5113
View Article Online
the use of conducting polymer matrices like polyaniline (PANI) Construction of the enzyme electrodes
is yet to be studied. PANI is a unique conducting polymer due to
Preparation of AuNPs/c-MWCNT/PANI modified Au elec-
its relatively facile synthesis, high conductivity and environ-
trode. Aniline (50 ml) was added to 10.0 ml of 1 N HCl and elec-
mental stability. To the best of our knowledge, no attempt has
trodeposited onto the Au electrode through a cyclic voltammetric
been made to combine it with nanomaterials for the improve-
technique using a potentiostat/galvanostat. Prior to electrode-
ment of lysine biosensors. We describe herein the construction of
position, the Au electrode was polished with 0.05 mM alumina
two novel amperometric lysine biosensors based on the covalent
slurry and then immersed in piranha solution (a hot mixed solu-
immobilization of lysine oxidase (LOx) onto AuNPs/carboxyl-
tion of conc. H2SO4 and 30% H2O2 in a 3 : 1 ratio (v/v)) for 15 min,
ated multiwalled carbon nanotubes (c-MWCNT)/PANI and
followed by ultrasonic cleaning with DW. The electrochemical
AuNPs/c-MWCNT/DAB electrodeposited on Au electrodes,
polymerization of aniline onto the Au electrode (working elec-
and their comparison and application.
trode) was achieved through cyclic voltammetry, by applying ten
polymerization cycles at 0.0 to +1.5 V.22 1 mg c-MWCNTs was
Published on 03 September 2012 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/C2AN35629E
Lysine oxidase (EC 1.4.3.14 from Trichoderma viride), 1,2-di- Au electrode was dipped into this c-MWCNT solution for 24 h at
aminobenzene, and aniline from Sigma Chemical Co., USA, room temperature. The resulting c-MWCNT/PANI/Au electrode
sodium citrate dehydrate and hydrogen tetrachloroaurate tri- was washed thoroughly with DW to remove unbound matter and
hydrate from Sisco Research Laboratory, Mumbai, India, then immersed into the AuNPs solution for 12 h at 4 C. The
carboxylated multiwalled carbon nanotubes (c-MWCNT) electrode was washed again with DW to remove any unbound
(Functionalized MWCNT, 12 walls, length 15–30 mm, purity matter, and kept in a dry Petri plate at 4 C until use.
90%, metal content: nil) from Intelligent Materials Pvt. Ltd.,
Panchkula (Haryana), India, and Alamin M Forte (amino acids Preparation of AuNPs/c-MWCNT/DAB modified Au electrode.
with minerals capsules) manufactured by M/S Albert David Prior to use, the Au electrode (1.5 0.05 cm2) was polished with
Limited, Ghaziabad, India, were used. Au wire (1.5 0.05 cm2, alumina slurry, treated with piranha solution and washed in DW
23 carat) was purchased from a local market. All other chemicals as described above. Then the electrode was held at a fixed
were of analytical reagent grade. Double distilled water (DW) potential of +1.2 V vs. Ag/AgCl in NaOH (1 M), for 5 min
was used throughout the experiments. and then scanned between 0.2 V and +1 V (at a scan rate of
50 mV s1) for 5 min in the same NaOH solution. The Au
Apparatus electrode was pre-treated by potential cycling from 0.2 V to
+1.2 V in 0.5 M H2SO4 for 20 min. A DAB film was electro-
Amperometric measurements were conducted with a potentio-
deposited onto the electrode surface by means of cyclic voltam-
stat/galvanostat (model: Autolab AUT83785, Ecochemie, the
metry at 0.0 to +0.8 V in a 0.05 M solution of the
Netherlands). The morphology of the AuNPs was studied by
1,2-diaminobenzene monomer in sodium phosphate buffer (pH
transmission electron microscopy (TEM) at Punjab University,
7.4). The electrode was scanned until the current reached a value
Chandigarh. Ultrasonication was performed on Misonix Ultra-
which remained constant after further cycling. The potential was
sonic Liquid Processors (Mode XL-2000 series). Fourier trans-
continuously cycled until a minimum value of current was
form infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy of the modified electrodes
reached which remained constant after further cycling. This
was carried out with a FTIR spectrometer (model: iS10, Ther-
indicated that the electrode surface was completely covered by
moelectron, USA). Scanning electron microscopy
the polymer.18 The AuNPs/c-MWCNT/DAB modified Au elec-
(SEM) measurements of the electrodes were carried out at the
trode was prepared from the DAB coated Au electrode as
Department of Chemistry, M. D. University, Rohtak. Lysine
described above.
analysis of milk samples by HPLC was carried out commercially
at Arbro Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Analytical Division), New Delhi,
India. Immobilization of LOx enzyme on the modified Au electrodes.
Both types of enzyme electrodes were prepared by dropping
50 ml of LOx solution (6 U) onto the surface of the modified
Preparation of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs)
electrodes and keeping them at 4 C for 24 h. The enzyme
AuNPs were prepared according to the method of McFarland electrodes were rinsed with reaction buffer, dried and stored at
et al.,24 with modifications. 20 ml of 1.0 mM hydrogen tetra- 4 C until use.
chloroaurate (HAuCl4) solution in a flask was kept on a hot plate The fabrication of the lysine biosensors based on the LOx/
under constant stirring. To this boiling solution, 1% trisodium AuNPs/c-MWCNT/PANI modified Au electrode is summarized
citrate dehydrate (2 ml) was added dropwise. The gold sol was in Scheme 1A. Firstly, both PANI and DAB were electro-
formed gradually, as the citrate reduced the HAuCl4 solution to deposited onto two separate Au electrodes with free –NH2
gold. The change of colour of the solution from blackish to wine groups at their ends, which linked to the –COOH groups of
red confirmed the aggregation of the nanoparticles. The colloidal MWCNTs through amide bonds (–CONH–). The electrodepo-
gold solution was then stored in dark bottles at 4 C after sition method was selected to produce a polymer layer on elec-
cooling. The morphological characterization of the AuNPs was trode surface, as this method was easy to carry out and the layer
carried out by TEM. thickness could be controlled. AuNPs were deposited on the
5114 | Analyst, 2012, 137, 5113–5122 This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
View Article Online
Published on 03 September 2012 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/C2AN35629E
Downloaded by University of New Hampshire on 24 February 2013
Scheme 1 (A) Schematic representation of the fabrication of the lysine oxidase/AuNPs/c-MWCNT/PANI modified Au electrode. (B) Schematic
representation of the electron flow and current generation in the lysine biosensor employing LOx/AuNPs/c-MWCNT/PANI/Au as the working
electrode.
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 Analyst, 2012, 137, 5113–5122 | 5115
View Article Online
Science, Rohtak, and analyzed for lysine using the present elec-
þ NH3
trode. The procedure for the measurement of lysine in these
samples was the same as described for the response measurement
þ0:4V of the electrodes, except that lysine was replaced by the sample.
H2 O2 ! 2Hþ þ O2 þ 2e- The content of lysine in these samples was determined from the
standard curve of lysine concentration vs. current in mA
To evaluate the activity of the LOx/AuNPs/c-MWCNT/ (Fig. 1A) (prepared in buffer).
PANI/Au and LOx/AuNPs/c-MWCNT/DAB/Au electrodes, the
modified electrodes were characterized by a cyclic voltammo- Storage stability and reusability of modified Au electrodes
gram in the presence and absence of lysine. For this purpose,
To reuse the working electrodes, they were washed by dipping in
cyclic voltammograms of the working electrodes in an unstirred
Published on 03 September 2012 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/C2AN35629E
Optimization of biosensors
Optimization of the lysine biosensors was accomplished by
measuring their response at different pH values (from 5.5 to 10.0)
using citrate buffer (pH 5.5), phosphate buffer (pH 6.0, 6.5, 7.0
and 7.5), Tris buffer (pH 8.0 and 8.5) and bicarbonate buffer (pH
9.0 and 10.0), each at 0.1 M final concentration containing 0.1 M
potassium chloride. To determine the optimum temperature, the
reaction mixture was incubated at temperatures ranging from
20 C to 55 C at intervals of 5 C. To study the effect of substrate
concentration, different lysine concentrations ranging from 5 to
600 mM were tested by cyclic voltammetry from 0.0 to +1.5 V at a
scan rate of 20 mV s1. The limit of detection (LOD) was
calculated from the standard deviation (SD) of the response and
the slope of the calibration curve (S) at levels approximating the
LOD, according to the formula, LOD ¼ 3.3(SD/S). The SD of
the response was determined from the standard deviation of the
y-intercepts of the regression line. The amperometric response
was also measured in the presence of potential interfering
substances, methionine, phenylalanine, proline, serine, uric acid,
ascorbic acid, histidine, cysteine, tyrosine, arginine, tryptophan,
glutamic acid and ornithine, each at 1 mM concentration.
5116 | Analyst, 2012, 137, 5113–5122 This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
View Article Online
Results and discussion shapes on the electrode surfaces (Fig. S1e and i†) show the pres-
ence of the enzyme layer after immobilization.
The AuNPs synthesized in this study were essentially very fine
and monodisperse with a diameter of ca. 18–20 nm, as seen from
their TEM image (Fig. 1B). FTIR characterization of the modified electrodes
acterized by SEM studies. SEM of the bare Au electrode (ESI, PANI at 1577 and 1485 cm1, and bands at 1319 cm1 assigned
Fig. S1a†) showed a smooth and featureless morphology. to the –C–N stretching of 2 amines. It shows that the aniline was
However, fine fiber-like structures indicate the presence of a polymerized to form a PANI chain linked through –NH– bonds
Downloaded by University of New Hampshire on 24 February 2013
polymer layer on the Au electrode surfaces (ESI, Fig. S1b and f†). at the Au electrode, with two free –NH2 groups at its ends. Curve
The tubular structures in ESI, Fig. S1c and g† and the granular ii shows the peak of the C–O bond of free –COOH groups at
structures in ESI, Fig. S1d and h† indicate the presence of 1294.99 and 1343.93 cm1, and the –CONH– bonds of MWCNT
c-MWCNT and AuNPs, respectively, on the surface. Globular immobilized on PANI at 1625 cm1. It reveals that the –COOH
Fig. 2 (A) FTIR spectra of (i) PANI, (ii) c-MWCNT/PANI/Au electrode and (iii) LOx/AuNPs/c-MWCNT/PANI/Au electrode. (B) FTIR spectra of (i)
DAB, (ii) c-MWCNT/DAB/Au electrode and (iii) LOx/AuNPs/c-MWCNT/DAB/Au electrode.
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 Analyst, 2012, 137, 5113–5122 | 5117
View Article Online
5118 | Analyst, 2012, 137, 5113–5122 This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
View Article Online
S1 F 229.0 1.00
S2 F 244.0 0.70
Fig. 5 (A) The voltammograms of the LOx/AuNPs/c-MWCNT/PANI/ S3 M 216.8 0.44
Au electrode obtained in the presence of different concentrations of S4 F 278.8 0.44
lysine: (a) 5, (b) 50, (c) 100, (d) 200, (e) 300, (f) 400, (g) 500 and (h) 600 mM S5 M 220.0 0.70
in phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7.0) at a scan rate of 50 mV s1. (B) The S6 M 271.3 0.30
S7 M 274.5 0.44
voltammograms of the LOx/AuNPs/c-MWCNT/DAB/Au electrode S8 M 274.7 0.45
obtained in the presence of different concentrations of lysine: (a) 20, (b) S9 F 263.8 0.80
50, (c) 100, (d) 200, (e) 300, (f) 400, (g) 500 and (h) 600 mM in phosphate S10 F 233.8 0.90
buffer (50 mM, pH 7.0) at a scan rate of 50 mV s1.
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 Analyst, 2012, 137, 5113–5122 | 5119
Downloaded by University of New Hampshire on 24 February 2013
Published on 03 September 2012 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/C2AN35629E
Table 3 Comparison of performance characteristics of membrane based LOx biosensors with the present biosensors
Our results show that the LOx/AuNPs/c-MWCNT/PANI and within and between batch coefficients of variation were low
modified Au electrode demonstrated a greater synergistic effect for each electrode. However, the coefficient of variation for the
toward the oxidation of lysine compared with the LOx/AuNPs/c- PANI modified Au electrode was the lowest (within batch: 1.59%,
MWCNT/DAB modified Au electrode. and between batch: 2.17%) compared to the DAB modified Au
electrode (within batch: 1.70%, and between batch: 4.40%). The
Optimization of lysine biosensors high precision indicated the reproducibility and consistency of the
developed biosensors. To study the correlation of the present
The experimental conditions affecting the biosensor response biosensors, the lysine levels in 15 H-milk (HCl hydrolysed milk)
were studied in terms of the effects of pH, incubation tempera- samples determined by the present biosensor (y) were compared
ture, time and substrate (lysine) concentration. The flow of with those determined by the standard HPLC method (x) (from
electrons (i.e., current) was measured in mA at +0.4 V (ESI, the same batch). The values obtained by the LOx/AuNPs/c-
Fig. S3a–c†). Both the modified Au electrodes showed a MWCNT/PANI/Au and LOx/AuNPs/c-MWCNT/DAB/Au
maximum response at pH 7.0, which is more or less similar to
Published on 03 September 2012 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/C2AN35629E
than that of the free enzyme (37 C). The decrease in the
optimum temperature of the enzyme after immobilization might
Application
be due to the increase in enzyme rigidity upon immobilization
through covalent binding. The PANI and DAB based biosensors The lysine contents of milk, amino acid tablets and serum, as
showed optimum response within 2 s and 4 s, respectively. determined by the present PANI modified biosensor, are given in
the tables. The lysine content was in the range 199.4 to 234.3 mM
Effect of lysine concentration on the response of enzyme in the H-milk samples (Table 1), 24.6 mg in an amino acid tablet,
electrodes and 216.8 to 278.8 mM in sera of apparently healthy persons with
a mean of 248.0 mM (n ¼ 10) (Table 2), which is within the
The effect of lysine concentration on biosensor response was normal established range (150–250 mM).
measured by adding different concentrations (5–600 mM) of
lysine, which was oxidized, producing an electroactive H2O2.
Storage stability and reusability
Formation of H2O2 was detected by its oxidation generating
electrons (i.e., current at the electrode). Fig. 5A and B show the The half life of the LOx/AuNPs/c-MWCNT/PANI/Au biosensor
cyclic voltammograms of the enzyme electrodes’ response at was 4 months, which is better than that of the LOx/AuNPs/c-
different lysine concentrations. There was a linear increase in MWCNT/DAB biosensor (3 months) (ESI, Fig. S4†).
oxidation current with the increase in lysine concentration in the A comparison of various analytical properties of the present
range 20–600 mM for the DAB electrode, and 5–600 mM for the biosensors with the earlier reported biosensor is summarized in
PANI modified electrode. The current response observed in case Table 3.
of the PANI electrode was higher than that of the DAB modified
Au electrode. Conclusion
Interference study The use of PANI/DAB and nanoparticles (AuNPs/c-MWCNT)
in the construction of lysine biosensors has resulted in its much
There was practically no interference in the response measure- improved analytical performance over earlier reported biosen-
ment of either of the electrodes by methionine, phenylalanine, sors in terms of response time (2 s and 4 s), limit of detection (5
proline, serine, uric acid, ascorbic acid, histidine, cysteine, tyro- and 20 mM), higher stability (up to 4 months) and no interference
sine, arginine, tryptophan, glutamic acid or ornithine, each at a from various serum substances. The PANI modified electrode
final concentration of 1 mM (ESI, Table S1†). showed better performance than the DAB modified electrode.
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 Analyst, 2012, 137, 5113–5122 | 5121
View Article Online
9 H. Yoshida, Y. Nakano, K. Koiso, H. Nohta, J. Ishida and 17 A. M. Almuaibed and A. Townshend, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1997, 338,
M. Yamaguchi, Anal. Sci., 2001, 17, 107–112. 149–154.
10 I. B. Z. Diaz and S. C. Ricke, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2003, 62, 18 A. Curulli, S. Kelly, C. O’Sullivan, G. G. Guilbault and G. Palleschi,
268–273. Biosens. Bioelectron., 1998, 13, 1245–1250.
11 E. Vrbova and M. Marek, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1992, 270, 131–136. 19 H. Olschewski, A. Erlenkotter, C. Zaborosch and G. C. Chemnitius,
12 F. Preuschoff, U. Spohn and D. Janasek, Biosens. Bioelectron., 1994, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 2000, 26, 537–543.
9, 543–549. 20 C. A. Marquette, A. Degiuli and L. J. Blum, Biosens. Bioelectron.,
13 J. Saurina, S. Hernandez-Cassou, S. Alegret and E. Fabregas, 2003, 19, 433–439.
Biosens. Bioelectron., 1999, 14, 211–220. 21 R. K. Shervedani, Z. Hemmatian and A. Hatefi-Mehrjardi,
14 F. Mazzei, F. Botre, G. Favero, E. Podesta and C. Botre, Microchem. Bioelectrochemistry, 2009, 75, 124–129.
J., 2009, 91, 209–213. 22 N. Chauhan, J. Narang and C. S. Pundir, Analyst, 2011, 136, 1938–
15 N. Garcia-Villar, J. Saurina and S. Hernandez-Cassou, Anal. Chim. 1945.
Acta, 2003, 477, 315–324. 23 S. Andreescu and L. A. Luck, Anal. Biochem., 2008, 375, 282–290.
16 M. G. Lavagnini, D. Moxone and G. Pallexhi, Talanta, 1993, 40, 24 A. D. McFarland, C. L. Haynes, C. A. Mirkin, R. P. Van Duyne and
1301–1306. H. A. Godwin, J. Chem. Educ., 2004, 81, 544A–544B.
Published on 03 September 2012 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/C2AN35629E
Downloaded by University of New Hampshire on 24 February 2013
5122 | Analyst, 2012, 137, 5113–5122 This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012