CHAPTER 2

PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS, AND INTERPRETATION

This chapter presents the analysis of data being gathered, and shows the interpretation of

the analysed data gathered from the respondents.

The Satisfaction Level of UCLM Engineering students using ClassIn app as an online

learning platform is the focus of this study. The researchers used Likert scale in quantifying the

respondents’ responses.

Using a 4 point scale, 4 = Always, 3 = Often, 2 = Sometimes, 1 = Never, the responses

will be averaged in order to provide the overall average score which is rated as: between 1 - 1.75

= Never, between 1.76 – 2.5 = Sometimes, between 2.56 – 3.25 = Often, and between 3.26 –

4.00 = Always. For the satisfaction level, the same method is being used which are rated as:

between 1 – 1.75 = Very unsatisfied, between 1.76 – 2.5 = Unsatisfied, between 2.56 – 3.25 =

Satisfied, and between 3.26 – 4.00 = Very Satisfied.

 What year level are you?
6%
First year
26% Second year
24% Third year
Fourth year
Fifth year

44%

Figure 8. What year level are you?

For figure 8, this shows how many students have answered the survey per year. There are

18 (26%) first years who answered the survey, 30 (44%) second years, 16 (24%) third years, 4

(6%) fourth years for a total of 69 respondents who participated in the survey.
 Do you use ClassIn in all of your
synchronous classes?
16% Always
Often
36% Sometimes
Never

48%

Figure 9. Do you use ClassIn in all of your synchronous classes?

In figure 9, 11 (16%) of the sample uses the ClassIn app in all of their synchronous

classes, 33 (48%) often use ClassIn, 25 (36%) sometimes use ClassIn, and 0 (0%) of the samples

never use ClassIn. With the data shown, due to the implementation of using ClassIn as an online

class learning platform, the average response is Often in using ClassIn in all of their synchronous

classes.
 Do you have trouble using ClassIn app?
1%
17%
Always
Often
Sometimes
48% Never

33%

Figure 10. Do you have trouble using ClassIn app?

In figure 10, 12 (17%) always have trouble in using the ClassIn app, 23 (33%) often have

trouble in using the ClassIn app, 33 (48%) sometimes have trouble using the ClassIn app, and 1

(2%) have never experienced any trouble in using the ClassIn app. This shows that the average

response is Sometimes, therefore the students sometimes have trouble in using ClassIn app.
 Responses of the problems being encountered in using the ClassIn
Responses of the problems being encountered in using the ClassIn

Difficulty in participating duringlectures 23

Consumes excessive cellular 33

data

Having trouble entering the class 32

Slow app performance 29

Continuously disconnectingbetween classes 39

Figure 11. Problems encountered by the students using the ClassIn app

In figure 11, these are the problems encountered by the students while using the ClassIn

app, 23 (33%) of the students have difficulty in participating in lectures, 33 (48%) of the students

have responded that ClassIn consumes excessive amount of cellular data, 32 (46%) of the

students have trouble entering the class, 29 (42%) of the students have experienced slow app

performance in using ClassIn, and 39 (57%) of the students are continuously disconnecting

between classes.
 Do you have trouble learning in an online set up using the
ClassIn app as an online learning platform?
1%
16%
Always
Often
41% Sometimes
Never

42%

Figure 12. Do you have trouble learning in an online set up using the ClassIn app as an

online learning platform?

In figure 12, 11 (16%) of the students always have trouble in learning using the ClassIn

app, 29 (42%) of the students often have trouble in learning using the ClassIn app, 28 (41%) of

the students sometimes have trouble in learning using the ClassIn app, and 1 (1%) of the students

have trouble learning in using the ClassIn app. This shows that the average response is Often in

having trouble learning in an online set up using ClassIn as an online learning platfrorm.

Students’ evaluation on the ClassIn app

The respondents are asked to evaluate their satisfaction level of the ClassIn app as an

online class learning platform with regards to certain factors. Factors such as Student-Teacher

Interaction, Classroom features, and its Accessibility to students. These factors comes with

certain aspects that the respondents need to rate: Always with a rating score of 4 which is the

highest, Often with a rating score of 3, Sometimes with a rating score of 2, and Never with a
rating score of 1 which is the lowest. The tables shown below are the gathered and interpreted

data for each factors.

1. STUDENT-TEACHER INTERACTION

FREQUENCIES
Always Often Sometimes Never Verbal
FACTORS Total x̄
(4) (3) (2) (1) Interpretation
a) I can talk
to my
instructo
48 90 46 4 188 2.72 Often
r
whenever
I want.
b) The
instructo
rs can
reach out 76 93 34 2 205 2.97 Often
to any
student
any time.
c) The
instructo
rs can
deliver
the 72 111 24 2 209 3.03 Often
discussio
ns
effectivel
y.
d) I 27 105 48 1 181 2.62 Often

understa

nd the

discussio
 ns

clearly.
e) If I want
to answer
a
question,
I can
64 87 38 5 194 2.81 Often
easily
talk to
my
instructo
r.
f) If I want
to raise a
concern,
my
84 87 22 3 206 2.99 Often
instructo
r can
acknowle
dge me.

Average
weighte 2.85 Often
d mean

Table 1. Student-Teacher Interaction

In table 1, the respondents are asked to evaluate their satisfaction level of the ClassIn app

with regards to Student-Teacher interaction. In the table, all of the mentioned aspects have the

same verbal interpretation in the calculation of the weighted means. And it is indicated that the

students’ evaluation on the effectiveness of ClassIn app with regards to the Student-Teacher

interaction has an average weighted mean of 2.85 which means that the students are often

satisfied with the Student-Teacher interaction in using the ClassIn app.

2. CLASSROOM FEATURES (In terms of simulating a real classroom)

FREQUENCIES
Alway Often Sometimes Never Verbal
FACTORS Total x̄
s (4) (3) (2) (1) Interpretation
a) The
classroom
board
effectively
shows the
notes 88 93 30 1 212 3.07 Often
being
written by
the
instructors
.
b) The
classroom
accommod
ates all the 80 87 38 1 206 2.99 Often
participan
ts /
students.
c) The entire
session is
recorded
and can be 40 81 56 4 181 2.62 Often
reviewed
by
students.
d) I can have
the
authority
to write
anything
on the 112 69 34 1 216 3.13 Often
board
when my
instructor
permits me
to do so.
e) I can meet 84 66 42 5 197 2.85 Often
with my
group
mates
 when a
group
activity is
needed.

Average
weighte 2.93 Often
d mean

Table 2. Classroom Features (In terms of simulating a real classroom)

Table 2 shows the students’ evaluation on their satisfaction level of the ClassIn app’s

classroom features in terms of simulating a real classroom. In the table, all of the mentioned

aspects have the same verbal interpretation upon the calculation of the weighted means. In

the table, it indicated that the students’ evaluation on their satisfaction level of the ClassIn

app in terms of it Classroom features has a calculated average weighted mean of 2.93, which

concludes that the students are often satisfied of the ClassIn app in terms of its classroom

features when it comes to simulating a real classroom.

3. ACCESSIBILITY TO STUDENTS

FREQUENCIES
Always Often Sometimes Never Verbal
FACTORS Total x̄
(4) (3) (2) (1) Interpretation
a) I can
easily
enter the
60 93 44 1 242 2.88 Often
classroo
m during
classes.
b) I can 72 84 44 1 201 2.91 Often
easily
access
the
features
of the
 app.
c) The app
is easy to
downloa
d and
84 78 44 0 206 2.99 Often
does not
take up a
lot of
storage.
d) The app
consumes
minimal
cellular
data and
doesn’t 32 66 62 8 168 2.43 Sometimes
require a
high
internet
speed to
operate.
Average
weighte 2.80 Often
d mean

Table 3. Accessibility to Students

Table 3 shows the students’ evaluation on their satisfaction level of the ClassIn app with

regards to its accessibility to the students. In the table, it is shown that for aspect (a), the students

can often enter the classroom during classes easily, for aspect (b), the students can often access

the features of the app easily, for aspect (c), the students responded that the ClassIn app is often

easy to download and does not take up a lot of storage, and for aspect (d), the students

responded that the ClassIn app sometimes consumes minimal cellular data and doesn’t require a

high internet speed to operate. Upon the calculation of the average weighted mean of 2.80, it is

concluded that students are often satisfied for the accessibility of the ClassIn app to the students.

The Students’ Satisfaction Level in using the ClassIn app

 FREQUENCIES
Very Satisfied Unsatisfied Very Total x̄ Verbal
satisfied (3) (2) unsatisfie Interpretat
(4) d (1) ion
How satisfied
are you in
using the 28 129 32 3 192 2.78 Satisfied
ClassIn app?

Table 4. The Students’ Satisfaction Level in using the ClassIn app

In table 4, it shows the students’ satisfaction level with their use of the ClassIn app. 7

(10%) of the respondents responded Very satisfied with a score rating of 4, 43 (64%) of the

respondents responded Satisfied with a score rating of 3, 16 (24%) responded Unsatisfied with a

score rating of 2, and 3 (2%) responded Very unsatisfied with a score rating of 1. With an

weighted mean of 2.78, it indicates that the ME students of UCLM are Satisfied in using the

ClassIn app as an online class learning platform.

Data analysis
 From the data gathered and analysed in this study by the researchers, the researchers

found that:

1. The ME students in UCLM often use the ClassIn app in their respective synchronous

classes. The data gathered showed that 16% of the respondents always use the ClassIn

app in synchronous classes, 48% often use the ClassIn app in synchronous classes, 36%

of the respondents sometimes use the ClassIn app in synchronous classes, and 0% of the

respondents never use ClassIn app in their synchronous classes.

2. ME students in UCLM sometimes have trouble using the ClassIn app. In the data

gathered, 17% of the respondents always have trouble in using the ClassIn app, 33%

often have trouble in using the ClassIn app, 48% sometimes have trouble using the

ClassIn app, and 2% have never experienced any trouble in using the ClassIn app.

3. ME students in UCLM encounters many problems in using the ClassIn app. Students tend

to frequently disconnect between their classes which has the most responses of 39,

followed by the excessive cellular data consumption with 33 responses, students having

trouble entering the class with 32 responses, slow app performance with 29 responses,

and the least problem encountered by the students with 23 responses which is having

difficulty in participating during lectures.

4. ME students in UCLM are often satisfied with the Student-Teacher interaction while

using ClassIn.

5. The data gathered showed that ME students in UCLM are often satisfied with the

classroom features the ClassIn app provides.

6. The data gathered and analyzed also shows that the students are often satisfied in the

ClassIn app’s accessibility to students.

7. With the factors being evaluated by the respondents, the respondents which is the ME

students of UCLM are Satisfied in their use of the ClassIn app.