A New Generalized Grounded Impedance Scaling Configuration With Electronic/Resistor Tunability

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

2019 6th International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN)

A New Generalized Grounded Impedance


Scaling Configuration with Electronic/Resistor
Tunability
Suraj Das K Kogara Naveen Kumar
Department of ECE Department of ECE
NIT Jamshedpur NIT Jamshedpur
Jamshedpur, India Jamshedpur, India
ksuraj98@gmail.com kogaranaveenkumar@gmail.com

Pappala Chandra Mouli Mayank Srivastava


Department of ECE Department of ECE
NIT Jamshedpur NIT Jamshedpur
Jamshedpur, India Jamshedpur, India
chandramouli.pappala@gmail.com mayank2780@gmail.com

Abstract— In this research article, an active configuration with electronic/ resistive scaling. The developed circuit
is proposed which acts similar to a impedance multipliar configuration employs only two VDCCs and three grounded
configuration. This configuration is able to increase or resistances. This circuit is free from passive/active element
decrease the impedance of any grounded passive network . The matching constraints and works satisfactorily non-ideal
presented circuit configuration employs two VDCCs and three conditions.
grounded resistances along with the impedance to be
multiplied. The scaling of impedance can be achieved through
resistance variation or bias current variation. The use of only II. CIRCUIT IDEA VDCC
grounded passive elements enhance the suitability for on-chip VDCC is a modern active component described in
integration. The working of the presented design has been [15] very first time. It can be viewed as a cascaded
investigated under non-ideal environment. The validation of combination of an operational transconductance amplifier
behavior of the proposed multiplier circuit has been confirmed
by designing and simulating an active filter. All the simulations
and 2nd generation current conveyor. It is a 6-terminal
have been performed in PSPICE Environment with 0.18μm device. The generalized block representation of VDCC is
CMOS technology. given in Figure 1.

Keywords—Electronic tuning, Grounded impedance scaling,


Resistive tuning, VDCC.

I. INTRODUCTION
Active realization of passive elements is a very
widespread research problem among circuit designers and
scientists. The on-chip realization of inductors, large value
capacitors and resistances is not recommended from the
viewpoint of efficient chip area realization, as large Fig.1. Block representation of VDCC
impedances consume significant area on the chip. Therefore,
impedance scaling circuits/ multipliers employing active The realization of VDCC using CMOS transistors
elements are very useful for such applications. In literature, is described in Fig.2[16]. The terminals N and P are input
numerous impedance simulation circuits have been voltage ports while Wp, Wn are output current ports. The
proposed by several researchers [1-14]. Some of these terminals Z and X are auxiliary terminals.
impedance simulation circuits are able to realize grounded
impedance multiplication also. But these circuits have one
or more following given disadvantages.
1. Employment of passive elements (Resistances and
Capacitances) in floating form [1-6], [7-9], [10],
[11-14].
2. Non-electronic scaling [1-5], [6], [7-9], [10], [11-
14].
3. Requirements for matched active/passive elements
[1-3], [7], [10], [12-14].

Therefore, the main aim of this research effort is to


present a VDCC based impedance (grounded) scaling circuit Fig.2. CMOS realization of VDCC[21]

XXX-X-XXXX-XXXX-X/XX/$XX.00 ©20XX IEEE


978-1-7281-1380-7/19/$31.00 ©2019 IEEE 811
1
Currents and voltages at different ports of VDCC
can be described by equations (1), (2), (3) & (4). Where ‘gm’ (7)
is transconductance gain of VDCC. (8)
(9)
(1) (10)
(2)
To study the effects of non-ideal conditions, the
(3) developed configuration is evaluated using non-ideal VDCC
equations (7), (8), (9), (10). The expression of input
(4) impedance in this case can be found as,
In the last one decade, several analog processing/
signal generation configurations have been developed by = (11)
several circuit designers [17-22].

III. PROPOSED GROUNDED IMPEDANCE SCALING Where (12)


CONFIGURATION
The developed impedance multiplier circuit
Where Į1 and Į2 are transconductance errors, ȕ1 and ȕ2 are
configuration consisting two VDCCs along with three
voltage transfer errors associated with VDCC1 and VDCC2
grounded resistances has been illustrated in Fig 3.
respectively.
Where is the current transfer error of VDCC-1.
So, from expression (11), it can be observed that
the behavior of designed multiplier configuration is
unaffected under non-ideal environment as no lossy term is
added. The sensitivity values of multiplication factor “K1”
corresponding to passive/active parameter values can be
evaluated as,
, , , ,
, , , ,
(13)
As magnitudes of all the sensitivity indexes are equal to
or less than one, the proposed configuration is less sensitive.

V. APPLICATION EXAMPLE
The working of developed impedance scaling
circuits is validated by an active filter design example.
Fig.3. Proposed Grounded Impedance scaling configuration. A simple single order high-pass filter is derived
employing the proposed configuration as a grounded
On circuit analysis of configuration of Fig 3,the impedance resistor. The conventional RC high-pass filtering circuit is
of this configuration is evaluated as given in Fig.4.
(5)

Where (6)

Where gm1 and gm2 are transconductance gains associated


with VDCC-1 and VDCC-2 respectively.
Now it can be shown from equation (5) that
presented configuration can scale down or scale up the
impedance of “Z” by a multiplication factor of K.
From equation (6), it can be seen that the value of
‘K’ can be varied by gm1/gm2/R2/R3. Therefore, both resistive
as well as electronic scaling is possible. ‘Z’ can be a single
passive element or a combination of passive elements.

IV. NON-IDEAL PERFORMANCE


On considering non ideal voltage-current transfer
Fig.4. Conventional RC High-Pass Filtering circuit
constants among various VDCC terminals, the defining
equations of VDCC can be modified as

812
6
10
R2=1KOhm R2=4KOhm
R2=2KOhm

Impedance(Ohm)
4
10

2
10

0
10 4 5 6 7 8
10 10 10 10 10
Frequency(Hz)

Fig.7. Resistive scaling of Z = through resistance R2.


8
10

R2=4KOhm

Impedance(Ohm)
6 R2=2KOhm
10 R2=1KOhm

4
10

2
10 4 5 6 7 8
10 10 10 10 10
Frequency(Hz)
Fig.8. Resistive scaling of Z = SL1 through resistance R2.
To show the electronic scaling of Z through bias
currents of employs VDCC, the simulations were executed
for various values of biasing currents. To demonstrate the
electronic scaling of 1 KŸ resistor connected at the place of
Fig.5. Active implementation of passive RC High Pass Filtering circuit
Z1, simulations have been performed for Ib1 of both VDCCs
using proposed configuration. equal to 50μA, 30μA, 10μA keeping Ib2 at a constant value
of 10μA. The frequency response plots are shown in Fig.9.
The active equivalent of the filtering configuration 10
6

of Fig.4 is illustrated in Fig.5 by replacing passive resistance Ib1=10uA

by presented configuration working in grounded resistance Ib1=50uA


Im pedance(Ohm )

mode.
5
10 Ib1=30uA

VI. SIMULATION RESULTS 10


4

To validate the performance of the developed 10 4


3
5 6 7
circuit as a grounded-impedance scaling configuration, the 10 10 10
Frequency(Hz)
10

simulations in PSPICE tool have been executed. For Fig.9. Electronic scaling of Z=R1 through different bias currents (Ib1) of
PSPICE simulations CMOS model of VDCC is VDCC -1 and VDCC-2
demonstrated in Fig 2. To study the electronic scaling of grounded
To demonstrate the working of the developed circuit capacitance C1 (C1=0.01mF) connected in place of Z1, again
configuration as a grounded resistance scaling circuit, Z1 is the simulations were run for different set of biasing currents
considered as resistance of value of 1KŸ. The scaling of (I1 of both VDCCs equal to 50μA, 30μA and 10μA keeping
this grounded resistance through R2 is demonstrated in Fig.6 Ib2 at a constant value of 100μA). The simulation results are
which indicates the input impedances at different values of given in Fig.10. Similarly, electronic scaling of grounded
R2 with R3 equal to 1KŸ, gm1=gm2=277μA/v (Ib1=50μA, inductance value 0.1mH is demonstrated in Fig.11.
8
Ib2=100μA). If we consider , the scaling of Z with 10
Ib1=10uA
Ib1=30uA
Co=0.01nF through R2 has been shown in Fig 7. On Ib1=50uA
Im pedance(O hm )

considering Z=LoS the scaling of Z through R2 has been


6
10

shown in Fig 8.
4
x 10
3.5 4
10
3
Impedance(Ohm)

2.5
R2=1KOhm 2
2 R2=4KOhm 10 4 5 6 7 8
1.5 R2=2KOhm 10 10 10 10 10
Frequency(Hz)
1
Fig.10. Electronic scaling of Z = through different bias currents (Ib1) of
0.5

0 4
VDCC -1 and VDCC-2.
5 6 7
10 10 10 10
Frequency(Hz)
Fig.6. Resistive scaling of Z=R1 through resistance R2.

813
10
8 [4] Senani R, ‘Active simulation of inductors using current
Ib1=10uA
Ib1=50uA
conveyors’ Electronics Letters, volume-14, no. 15, pp. 483-484,
Im p e d a n ce (O h m ) 1976.
6
10
Ib1=30uA [5] Dutta Roy S.C, ‘On operational amplifier simulation of
grounded Inductance’ Archiv fuer Elektronik und
10
4 Uebertragungstechnik, volume-29, pp. 107-115, 1975.

[6] Paul A. N. and Patranabis D., ‘Active simulation of grounded


10 4
2 inductors using a single current conveyor’ IEEE Transactions on
5 6 7 8
10 10 10 10 10 Circuits and Systems, volume-28, no.2, pp. 164-165, 1981.
Fi Frequency(Hz)
g.11. Electronic scaling of Z = SL1 through different bias currents (Ib1) of [7] Yuce.E and Minaei. S, ‘On the realization of simulated
VDCC -1 and VDCC-2 inductors with reduced parasitic impedance effects’ Circuits
The high pass filter developed using the proposed Systems and Signal Processing, volume-28, no. 3, pp. 451 –
impedance scaling configuration (given in fig 5), is also 465, 2009.
realized in PSPICE environment. The passive element
[8] Pal. K and Nigam. M. J, ‘Novel active impedances using current
values selected for simulation are: R1=R3=1KŸ, C2=0.01nF.
Conveyors’ Journal of Active and Passive Electronic Devices,
The bias current values were chosen as Ib1=50μA and volume-3, no. 1, pp. 29-34, 2008.
Ib2=100μA. The filter responses are plotted for different
values of R2 and shown in Fig 12. [9] Yuce. E, Minaei. S, and O. Cicekoglu, ‘Limitations of the
simulated inductors based on a single current conveyor’ IEEE
10
R2=3KOhm
Transactions on Circuits and Systems, volume-53, no. 12, pp.
0 2860-2867, 2006.
R2=2KOhm
V o lta g e G a in (d B )

-10 R2=1KOhm
[10] Kumar. P and Senani.R, ‘New grounded simulated inductance
-20 circuit using a single PFTFN’, Analog Integrated Circuits and
-30 Signal Processing, volume-62, no. 1, pp. 105-112, 2010.
-40 [11] Myderrizi I., Minaei S. and Yuce E., ‘DXCCII based grounded
-50 inductance simulators and filter applications’ Microelectronics
-60 3
Journal, volume-42, no. 9, pp. 1074-1081, 2011.
4 5 6 7 8
10 10 10 10 10 10
Frequency(Hz) [12] Gupta A., Senani A. R., Bhaskar D. R. and Singh A. K.,
Fig.12.Response of High Pass Filtering shown in Fig.5. ‘OTRA-based grounded-FDNR and grounded-inductance
simulators and their applications’ Circuits, Systems, and Signal
Processing, volume-31, no. 2, pp. 489-499, 2012.

[13] Metin B., ‘Supplementary inductance simulator topologies


employing single DXCCII’ Radioengineering, voume-20, no. 3,
VII. CONCLUSION pp. 614 -618, 2011.

[14] M. A. Ibrahim, S. Minaei, E. Yuce, N. Herencsar and J. Koton,


New arbitrary grounded impedance scaling
‘Lossy/lossless floating/grounded inductance simulator using
configuration with electronic/ resistive scaling has been one DDCC’ Radioengineering, volume-21, no. 1, pp. 2-10,
proposed employing three VDCCs and three grounded 2012.
resistances. The presented circuit can scale down or scale up
the values of any generalized grounded impedance through [15] Biolek D., Senani R., Biolkova V., Kolka Z., ‘Active elements
for analog signal processing; classification, review and new
bias current variation (electronic scaling) or grounded
proposals,’ Radio engg, Journal, volume-17, No. 4, pp. 15-32,
resistance variation (resistive scaling). As the developed 2008.
configuration has only grounded resistances, it is found
suitable for on-chip implementation. The circuit exhibits [16] FÕrat Kacara, Abdullah Yes¸ila,‫כ‬, Shahram Minaeib, Hakan
excellent nonideal performance and enjoys low active Kuntmanca Department, ‘ Positive/negative lossy/lossless
passive sensitivities. The working of developed multiplier is grounded inductance simulators employing single VDCC and
only two passive elements’ International journal of Electronics
verified by simulations under PSPICE Environment. and communication(AEU),
Int.j.electron.commun(AEU)68(2014)73-78.

REFERENCES [17] Dinesh Prasad, D. R. Bhaskar and Mayank Srivastava, ‘New


single VDCC-based explicit current-mode SRCO employing all
grounded passive components’ Electronics Journal (Banja luka)
[1] Prescott A. J, ‘Loss compensated active gyrator using volume-18, no.2, pp. 81-88, 2014.
differential input operational amplifier’ Electronics Letters,
volume-2, no. 7, pp. 283-284, 1966. [18] Mayank Srivastava, Ajay Roy and Ramendra Singh, ‘New
VDCC based Electronically Tunable Grounded Frequency
[2] Ford R. L, and Girling F. E. J, ‘Active filters and oscillators Dependent Negative Resistance Simulator employing grounded
using simulated inductance’ Electronics Letters, volume-2, no. passive elements’ IEEE-RDCAPE-2017, Noida, India.
2, pp. 481-482, 1966.
[19] Mayank Srivastava, Bhanja P. and Mir S. F., ‘A new
[3] Orchard H. J. and Willson A. N., ‘New active gyrator circuits’ configuration for simulating passive elements in floating state
Electronics Letters, volume-10, no. 13, pp. 261-262, 1974. employing VDCCs and grounded passive elements’ IEEE-
International Conference on Power Electronics, Intelligent

814
Control and Energy Systems (ICPEICES- 2016), , pp. 13-18,
Delhi, India, 2016.

[20] Dinesh Prasad, Mayank Srivastava Anwar Ahmad, Apritam


Mukhopadhyay, Bharat Bhushan Sharma ‘Novel VDCC Based
Low-Pass and High-Pass Ladder Filters’ IEEE-INDICON-2015,
pp.1-4, 2015, New Delhi, India.

[21] Mayank Srivastava and Dinesh Prasad “VDCC based dual-mode


quadrature sinusoidal oscillator with current/voltage outputs at
appropriate impedance level” Advances in Electrical and
Electronics Engineering, volume-14, no. 2, pp. 168-177, 2016.

[22] Mayank Srivastava, ‘New Synthetic Grounded FDNR with


Electronic Controllability Employing Cascaded VDCCs and
Grounded Passive Elements’ Journal of Telecommunication,
Electronics and Computer Engineering, volume-9, no. 4, pp.
97-102, 2017.

815

You might also like