The Supreme Court of the Philippines affirmed the death penalty imposed on Leo Echegaray for raping his 10-year old daughter Rodessa. Echegaray argued the penalty was excessive because he was not Rodessa's biological father. However, the Court ruled that because Rodessa referred to Echegaray as "Papa" and he was the confirmed lover of her mother, he was considered a common-law spouse and biological relationship did not preclude the death penalty.
The Supreme Court of the Philippines affirmed the death penalty imposed on Leo Echegaray for raping his 10-year old daughter Rodessa. Echegaray argued the penalty was excessive because he was not Rodessa's biological father. However, the Court ruled that because Rodessa referred to Echegaray as "Papa" and he was the confirmed lover of her mother, he was considered a common-law spouse and biological relationship did not preclude the death penalty.
The Supreme Court of the Philippines affirmed the death penalty imposed on Leo Echegaray for raping his 10-year old daughter Rodessa. Echegaray argued the penalty was excessive because he was not Rodessa's biological father. However, the Court ruled that because Rodessa referred to Echegaray as "Papa" and he was the confirmed lover of her mother, he was considered a common-law spouse and biological relationship did not preclude the death penalty.
Parties PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, plaintiff-appellee, vs. LEO ECHEGARAY y PILO, accused-appellant. Brief Background Accused-appellant allegedly raped her 10-year- old daughter, Rodessa Echegaray, in their own house in Quezon City, sometime in April 1994. Argument of the accused-appellant That the death penalty imposed is excessive because he is not the biological father of victim. Rodessa was the daughter of the accused- appellant’s common law partner, Rosalie Echegaray, and was sired by Conrado Alfonso the paramour of Alicia Rivera, the mother of Rosalie Echegaray. Issue Whether or not the death penalty is an excessive penalty for this case, given that the accused- appellant is not the biological father of the victim Ruling of the RTC Guilty of rape Ruling SC SC affirmed the decision of the RTC Reasoning of the Court The fact that the ten-year old Rodessa referred to the accused-appellant as "Papa" is reason enough to conclude that accused-appellant is either the father or stepfather of Rodessa and Considering that the accused-appellant is a confirmed lover of Rodessa's mother, he falls squarely within the afore quoted portion of the Death Penalty Law under the term "common-law spouse of the parent of the victim."