APPENDIX – CASE STUDY ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
Note:
Overall Understanding and Application
Grade of Theory (UAT) (25%)
90+  Showed a very thorough
understanding of the
theory
 Able to apply the
theoretical concept at
deep level
22-25
70-89  Showed a good
understanding of the
theory
 Able to apply the
theoretical concept at
good level
17-21
50-69  Showed a working
understanding of the theory
 able to satisfactorily assess the
case but applied the theoretical
concept at a surface level
13-16
30-49  Showed basic understanding of
the theory; attempted to assess
the case and apply the
theoretical concept in a very
limited level
8-12
0-29  Showed little understanding of
the theory; poorly assessed the
case and applied the theoretical
concept
0-7
Problem Solving (PS)
(20%)
 Able to suggest and bring out
exceptional solutions to the
case
 many solutions were provided;
exceptionally logical approach
to seek for solutions was
observed
18-20
 Able to suggest and bring out
appropriate solutions to the
case
 many solutions were provided
and approach to seek for
solutions was observed
14-17
 Able to bring out some solutions
 logical flow was still observed
but there was a lack of
relevance of the flow
10-13
 Still able to bring out a few
solutions; logical flow was
hardly observed
6-9
 Failed to bring out any solution
to the case; logical flow was not
observed
0-5
Creative Opinion and Solutions
(COS) (20%)
 Able to come up with
exceptionally innovative
opinions
 Solutions were not those
mentioned in textbook and
lesson
18-20
 Able to come up with good
opinions
 Some of the solutions were
not mentioned in textbook
and lesson
14-17
 Attempted to look for a few
innovative opinions but mostly
relied on those provided in the
book and lesson
10-13
 Tried but did not bring any
innovative solutions; all
solutions were those mentioned
on textbook and lesson
6-9
 Failed to show or didn’t attempt
to give any innovative opinions;
ideas were only those on
textbook
0-5
Case Analysis (CA)
(20%)
 A deep and critical analysis
was made based on a
problem
18-20
 A good and critical analysis
was made based on a
problem
14-17
 A satisfactory analysis was
made; showed the attempt to
analyze the case from a
satisfactory perspective but not
deep and critical enough
10-13
 Analysis was made based on
the subject discipline at a
surface level
6-9
 Failed to make an analysis of
the case with the context of the
subject
0-5
Language and Form (LF)
(15%)
 Language is error free in
terms of grammar and
vocabulary
 Fully follows the structure
required
13-15
 Language contains some
grammar and vocabulary
errors
 Almost all sections follow the
structure required
10-12
 Language contains many
grammar and vocabulary
errors but those don’t affect
the meaning
 Most of the sections follow
the structure required
7-9
 Language contains numerous
grammar and vocabulary
errors. Meaning if often
unclear
 Many sections do not follow
the structure required
4-6
 Language errors prevail making
the barely or incomprehensible
 None of very few sections
follow the structure required
0-3
APPENDIX C - MARKING & FEEDBACK SHEET
Students Chinese Student English
Student ID:
Name: Name:

Marker’s Name: Submission Date: FINAL GRADE:

Criteria Weighting Marker 1 Marker 2 Comment

Understanding and
Application of Theory 25%
(UAT)

Problem Solving
20%
(PS)

Creative Opinion and

Solutions 20%
(COS)

Case Analysis
20%
(CA)

Language and Form

15%
(LF)

Additional Feedback: