Rubric For Ethical Decision Making Paper Written Assignment

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia ‫المملكة العربية السعودية‬
Ministry of Education ‫وزارة التعليم‬

University of Hail ‫جامـعـة حـائل‬
College of Nursing ‫كلية التمريض‬
INTERDISCIPLINARY PROFESSIONAL ETHICS (NURS 523)

Rubric for Ethical Decision-making Paper – Written Assignment
Assessment Task Assessment Score

Rubric for Ethical Decision-making Paper – Written
□ 10%
Assignment
Student Name:
Student ID:
Date:
Overall Grade:
Assessment Rubric:
ITEM POOR ACCEPTABLE IDEAL CLO STUDENT’S

(0) (0.5) (1) GRADE
1) Did not Partially Comprehensively 1.1
Distinguishing distinguish the distinguished distinguished the
the position of position of the the position of position of the
the protagonist the protagonist protagonist (main
protagonist (main (main character in the
(main character in character in scenario).
character) in the scenario). the scenario).
the scenario.
2) Failed to Identified Completely 1.1
Identification identify any of some of the identified all of the
of the ethical the ethical ethical ethical dimensions
dimensions of dimensions of dimensions of of the presenting
the presenting the presenting the presenting case with respect to
case with case with case with the protagonist
respect to the respect to the respect to the (main character) in
protagonist protagonist protagonist the scenario.
(main (main (main
character) in character) in character) in
the scenario. the scenario the scenario.
3) Did not identify Partially Thoroughly 1.2, 1.3
Identification the competing identified identified all of the
of the professional some of the competing
competing principles and competing professional
professional values with professional principles and
principles and respect to the principles and values with respect
values with protagonist values with to the protagonist
respect to the (main respect to the (main character) in
Page 1 of 4
Accredited University by the ASIC on Accredited BSN Program by

March 27, 2017 AHPGS on February 15, 2018

protagonist character) in protagonist the scenario.

(main the scenario. (main
character) in character) in
the scenario. the scenario.
4) Failed to Partially Comprehensively 1.1
Distinguishing distinguish the distinguished distinguished the
the position of position of at the position of position of the at
at least one least one other at least one least one other
other professional in other professional in the
professional in the scenario. professional in scenario.
the scenario. the scenario.
5) Analysis of Provided no Provided an Provided an analysis 2.1
the similaritiesanalysis of the analysis of of both the
and/or similarities either just the similarities and
differences in and/or similarities or differences in the
the ethicaldifferences in just the ethical principles
principles the ethical differences in which the other
which the principles the ethical professional in the
other which the principles scenario would
professional in other which the consider compared
the scenario professional in other with the protagonist
would the scenario professional in (main character).
consider would consider the scenario
compared with compared with would consider
the the protagonist compared with
protagonist (main the protagonist
(main character). (main
character). character).
6) Utilization Did not utilize Partially Completely utilized 2.3
of a clearly a clearly utilized a a clearly identified
identified identified clearly ethical decision-
ethical ethical identified making model to
decision- decision- ethical systematically
making model making model decision- explore the
to to making model presenting situation.
systematically systematically to
explore the explore the systematically
presenting presenting explore the
situation. situation. presenting
situation.
7) Highlighting Failed to Highlighted Highlighted all of 2.3
relevant steps highlight the some of the the relevant steps of
Page 2 of 4


of the process relevant steps relevant steps the process involved

involved in the of the process of the process in the identified
identified involved in the involved in the ethical decision-
ethical identified identified making model
decision- ethical ethical decision utilized to
making model decision- making model systematically
utilized to making model utilized to explore the
systematically utilized to systematically presenting situation.
explore the systematically explore the
presenting explore the presenting
situation. presenting situation.
situation.
8) Formulation Did not Formulated a Formulated a 2.3
of a justified formulate a partially comprehensively
final position justified final justified final justified final
consistent position position position consistent
with consistent with consistent with with professional
professional professional professional practice.
practice practice. practice.
9) Composition Composed a Composed a Composed a well- Not
of a well- poorly fairly- structured ethical applicable
structured, structured structured decision-making
and ethical ethical paper free of
grammatically decision- decision- grammatical errors.
correct ethical making paper making paper
decision- with numerous with some
making paper. grammatical grammatical
errors. errors.
10) Reference Provided an Provided a Provided an Not
List insufficient reasonably extensive number of applicable
number of sufficient references for the
references for number of ethical decision-
the ethical references for making paper
decision- the ethical assignment.
making paper decision-
assignment. making paper
assignment.
TOTAL GRADE FROM A PERFECT SCORE OF 10
Evaluator’s Name: ________________________________

Page 3 of 4


Evaluator’s Signature: _______________________________
Page 4 of 4


Rubric For Ethical Decision Making Paper Written Assignment

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Rubric For Ethical Decision Making Paper Written Assignment

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia ‫المملكة العربية السعودية‬

Ministry of Education ‫وزارة التعليم‬

INTERDISCIPLINARY PROFESSIONAL ETHICS (NURS 523)

Assessment Task Assessment Score

ITEM POOR ACCEPTABLE IDEAL CLO STUDENT’S

Accredited University by the ASIC on Accredited BSN Program by

INTERDISCIPLINARY PROFESSIONAL ETHICS (NURS 523)

protagonist character) in protagonist the scenario.

Accredited University by the ASIC on Accredited BSN Program by

INTERDISCIPLINARY PROFESSIONAL ETHICS (NURS 523)

of the process relevant steps relevant steps the process involved

Evaluator’s Name: ________________________________

Accredited University by the ASIC on Accredited BSN Program by

INTERDISCIPLINARY PROFESSIONAL ETHICS (NURS 523)

Evaluator’s Signature: _______________________________

Accredited University by the ASIC on Accredited BSN Program by

You might also like