Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

As tuition fees have been inexorably increasing recently, the tuition waiving has

been a subject of interest. It is argued that whether the government should


abolish the tuition for students, regardless of their socio-economic background.
While this thinking is valid in certain extent, I believe that this could have an
adverse bearing on both students and society.
There are many compelling reasons why students should be allowed to attend
university without fee. On the individual level, students with distinct financial
status, especially the underprivileged could stand a better chance of landing a
higher-paid job as well as enhancing their life quality. Moreover, the surge in the
gross enrolment rate, prompted by the free college policy, would give a rise to the
more educated workforce. This acts as a precursor to a thriving economy and a
civilized society.
Despite the aforementioned benefits, I would contend that the provision of free-
of-charge higher education can, in fact, do both the beneficiaries and society a
disservice. The impact of more college graduates on employment is questionable
at best. The job market has been more competitive as it is, even for job seekers
with college qualifications. Therefore, if everyone is entitled to university, they
can not find a job for them, let alone financial abundance previously so often
associated with the acquisition of a tertiary degree. In addition to this, the
enormous cost incurred to cover higher education fee would put a strain on
government coffers, leading to budget deficits, tax hikes or reduced welfare
among others.
In conclusion, despite the potential benefits of tuition waiver, I believe that
government need not abolish the college fee.

You might also like