Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Regional Integration in Industrial Development in ECOWAS by Bitrus Kyangmah Samaila, BSC, MSC, MBA in View, University of Maiduguri, Nigeria.
Regional Integration in Industrial Development in ECOWAS by Bitrus Kyangmah Samaila, BSC, MSC, MBA in View, University of Maiduguri, Nigeria.
Introduction
The terms ‘regional integration’ and ‘regional cooperation’ have in common the involvement of
neighbouring countries in collaborative ventures. However, regional cooperation implies that this
is organized on an adhoc and temporary basis through contractual arrangements of some sort,
around projects of mutual interest, while regional integration involves something more permanent
(Bourenane). Regional integration is characterized by the establishment of joint institutional
mechanisms, a degree of shared sovereignty and functions in an intergovernmental rather than
supranational mode. Most current research in the area of regional integration is being done at a
sectoral level of analysis, on the agricultural, livestock and industrial sectors (Diop and Lavergne,
2016). For Marchal (1965), integration must be based on industrialization as its driving force, and
it must be sustained by those social forces capable of supporting and organizing the
industrialization process. According to Gibb (2009), regional integration remains an integral part
of Africa's development strategy and has underpinned most pan-African development policies for
the past 50 years. In theory, regional integration provides a bigger market for agricultural and
industrial goods, and services, thus allowing economies of scale for national industries. Even
without differences in resource endowments or technology, this in turn creates incentives to
specialise and trade in differentiated products (UNCTAD, 2015). Regional integration can
therefore be seen as promoting a more competitive and productive industrial development
(Hartzenberg, 2011), contributing to economic transformation and the creation of more and better
jobs.
It is among the regions that are least integrated into global value chains, especially concerning
processing activities. For ECOWAS Member States, competing in the regional market could
therefore provide a basis to learn and upgrade their technical, technological, managerial capacities
- which would in turn help them integrate and benefit from, global value chains (AfDB, 2013).
However, there are tensions between industrial cooperation between countries and competition -
this then defines the challenge faced by ECOWAS in promoting industrialization at the regional
level.
In order to better understand the political traction of the industrialization agenda of ECOWAS,
there is need to highlight some of the key factors and actors that influence and shape how the
regional organisation plays its role in supporting and promoting industrialization in the region. In
doing so, there is need to address the following three questions:
(i) what is the political traction of ECOWAS in driving or steering the regional
industrialization agenda;
(ii) (ii) what are the interests of member states in using ECOWAS to address their
industrialization challenges; and
(iii) (iii) which are the specific areas or sectors with most potential future traction for
ECOWAS to focus in continuing to address food insecurity at a regional level.
ECOWAS Industrialization Strategy/Origins
Despite the mention of industrialization in the 1975 Treaty of Lagos, there was no comprehensive
and well-coordinated industrial development policy for the region until the West African Common
Industrial Policy (WACIP) was agreed in 2010. Previous policies included the 1983 “Cooperation
Policy” - which was never implemented, followed by the “Five-year Industrial Development Plan”
(1987 – 1991), which led to initiatives such as the investment promotion agreements with the
European Union and other regional parties, and efforts led by Member States to promote product
standardization and quality assurance activities (ECOWAS, 2010).
In 2007, along with the restructuring of ECOWAS from Secretariat to a more powerful
Commission, the ECOWAS Commission established a Private Sector Department to facilitate the
creation of professional associations and businesses at a regional level, encourage cross border
investments, business partnerships and SME/SMIs, and create an enabling environment both for
endogenous investments and foreign direct investments (WACIP, 2010). The reform was further
accompanied by the reestablishment of several business initiatives, including the Federation of
West African Manufacturers Association (FEWAMA), the Federation of West African Chambers
of Commerce and Industry (FEWACCI) and the Federation of Women and Women Entrepreneurs
(FEBWWE).
Following the mandate given in 2002 to ECOWAS by the African Union to lead the integration
process in West Africa, thus “effectively subordinating WAEMU[UEMOA] to ECOWAS” (e.g.
Idrissa, 2013:12), the WACIP built on the UEMOA Common Industrial Policy and was adopted
in 2010. Its stated aim is to “accelerate the industrialization of West Africa through the promotion
of endogenous industrial transformation of local raw materials; development and diversification
of industrial productive capacity and strengthen regional integration and export of manufactured
goods” (ECOWAS, 2010, p. 38).
This ambition was translated into ten programmes and four objectives to be reached by 2030:
1. Raise the local raw material processing rate from 15-20% to an average of 30% by 2030;
2. Increase the manufacturing industry’s contribution to the regional GDP from 6-7% to over 20%
in 2030; 3. Increase intra-Community trade in West Africa from less than 12% to 40% by 2030,
with a 50% share of the region’s trade in manufactured goods, particularly in the area of energy
(equipment, electricity, petroleum products, etc.);
4. Increase the volume of exports of goods manufactured in West Africa to the global market from
the current 0.1% to 1% by 2030 (ECOWAS, 2010).
The WACIP was revised and updated in 2015, with a set of four key areas of actions to focus on:
4. Mobilisation of Resources.
These were to be accompanied by four priority industry sectors: Food and Agro industry;
Pharmaceutical industry; Construction materials industry, and Automotive and machinery
assembling industry (ECOWAS, 2016). Of these sectors, only the pharmaceutical industry
benefited from an earlier policy framework, the ECOWAS Regional Pharmaceutical Plan 2014-
2020. The latter was approved “to provide a strategic framework within which the pharmaceutical
sector in the region will be managed and regulated to provide self-sufficiency in the production,
access to and rational use of affordable essential medicines and other medical products of proven
quality safety and efficacy” (ECOWAS, 2014). Among the eight specific objectives, the plan aims
to improve and strengthen the governance of the pharmaceutical systems to ensure transparency,
accountability as well as patronage of medicines produced in the ECOWAS region by the year
2020 (ECOWAS, 2014).
Other identified measures include participation at ECOWAS Industry meetings to address the
status of industrial development in West Africa and to evaluate the implementation of WACIP
(ECOWAS, 2015). In terms of future reforms, the ministers also urged the ECOWAS Commission
to establish an “Eminent Persons Group” to help facilitate the implementation of WACIP and its
strategy.3 An ECOWAS Industrial Forum, starting in 2016, would also serve as a consultation
framework. Therefore, the first ECOWAS Industrial Forum took place in Ghana under the theme
“Promoting investment to accelerate the industrialization of the West African sub-region”, and
was organized by the Ghanaian government as the ECOWAS was unable to co-organize the
Summit due to some internal challenge from its re-organization activities.
As such, the 2010 WACIP gave figures for rising regional average value added with a view to
underpinning intra and extra-regional trade, raising question marks about how the increased rate
of processing and manufacturing share of GDP the regional might be distributed among countries.
In contrast, the 2015 WACIP focuses more on regional means to support national industrial
policies.
According to Mrs. Finda Koroma, the Vice President of ECOWAS at the Strategic Planning
Coordinating Committee (SPCC) meeting held in May 2018 in Abuja, Nigeria, “in order to realize
the vision of an empowered, economically liberated community of people, there must now be a
renewed focus on industrialization and the creation of jobs for the citizens of the West African
region”. This assertion highlights the importance of industrialization and the critical role that
ECOWAS can play in driving industrial development for the benefits of West African countries.
Below are some of those roles:
Hence, the theory that would best explain the trade relationship in the West African subregion is
the Jacob Viner’s Theory on Customs Union. The theory argues that discriminatory tariff reduction
can have a trade creation and/or diversion effect. For Viner, ambiguities in the welfare impact of
customs unions are related to the capacity and limitations of members to define their own external
trade policy. The net static effect of regional integration is positive if the formation of the
integration scheme has a net trade creation effect. However, static welfare analysis assumes that
the respective Member States of the integration scheme are complementary.
References
Balami, D. H. & Maidugu, A. (2004). Trade,Industry and Public Policy: Theory and Application
Bamiro, O. A. (1994). ‘National Technology Policy for Development: The Role of Research and
Development Institutions’. Paper presented at the National Workshop on Technology
Management, Policy and Planning in Nigeria, 18-21 October.
Bevan, D., P. Collier, and J. W. Gunning (1999). The Political Economy of Poverty, Equity, and
Growth: Nigeria and Indonesia. Oxford: Oxford University Press and World Bank.
Biersteker, T. J. (1987). Multinationals, the State, and Control of the Nigerian Economy.
Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Chete, L. N. J.et al (2016). Industrial development and growth in Nigeria: Lessons and challenges,
Brooking Institutions Working Paper.
Clapham, C. ‘The changing world of regional integration in Africa’, in C Clapham, G Mills, A
Morner & E Sidiropoulos (eds), Regional Integration in Southern Africa: Comparative
International Perspectives, Johannesburg: South Africa Institute of International Affairs
(SAIIA), 2001. Oxford: James Curry: 27-51.
Daniel Bach (ed.) Regionalism in Africa: Integration and Disintegration.
Diop, M.C.; Lavergne, R. 1994. Regional integration in West Africa: proceedings of the
international conference organized by IDRC in Dakar Senegal, 11–15 January 1993.
International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada.
Fashoyin, T., S. Matanmi, and A. Tawose (1994). ‘Reform Measures, Employment and Labour
Market Processes in the Nigerian Economy: Empirical Findings’, in T. Fashoyin (ed.),
Economic Reform Policies and the Labour Market in Nigeria. Lagos: Friedrich Ebert
Foundation.
Forrest, T. (1993). Politics and Economic Development in Nigeria. Oxford: Westview Press, Inc.
Ihonvbere, J. O. (1993). Nigeria: The Politics of Adjustment and Democracy. New
Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Hveem, H. (2000) ‘Explaining the Regional Phenomenon in an Era of Globalisation’, in Richard
Stubbs and Geoffrey R.D. Underhill (eds.) Political Economy and the Changing Global
Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (2nd Edition).
Jalilian, H., M. Tribe, and J. Weiss (eds) (2000). Industrial Development and Policy in Africa:
Issues of De-industrialization and Development Strategy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Josson, C, Sven T, and Gunnar, T. (2000) Organizing European Space. London: Sage Publication.
Jupp, V. (1996) ‘Documents and Critical Research’. Sapsford, R. and Jupp, V. (eds)
Data Collection and Analysis. London: Sage Publication.
Kennes, W. (1999) “African Regional Economic Integration and the European Union,”
Larner, W, & Walters, W. (2002) The Political Rationality of “New Regionalism”,
Towards A Genealogy of the Region. Theory and Society, Vol.31, No. 3. Pp 391-
432
Luwam G. Dirar, Rethinking and Theorizing Regional Integration in Southern Africa, 28 EMORY
INT'L L. REV. 123 (2014).
Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/eilr/vol28/iss1/5
Ogbonna B. M. et al, (2017). Restrategising Nigeria’s Industrialization and Industrial Policy for
Economic Recovery: Lessons from South Korea. International Journal of Research in
Management, Economics and Commerce, ISSN 2250-057X, Impact Factor: 6.384, Volume
07 Issue 07, Page 88-97
Richard Gibb (2009) Regional Integration and Africa's Development Trajectory: meta-theories,
expectations and reality, Third World Quarterly, 30:4, 701-
721, DOI: 10.1080/01436590902867136
African Development Bank, Economic Integration in Southern Africa, London: Biddles, 1993, p
1,
Mattli, W. (1999) The Logic of Regional Integration: Europe and Beyond. Cambridge University
Press, UK.